Covenant Village Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 175 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 41.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 105 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 107 beds and averages 98.7 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.65 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.83 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.38 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.76 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-12-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, staff interviews, interview with Wound Nurse Practitioner (WNP) #175, review of facility policy, and review of guidelines from the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP), the facility failed to adequately assess and monitor residents' skin and failed to timely identify pressure ulcers (a pressure ulcer is a localized injury of the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). This resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #104 who was admitted without pressure ulcers but was at risk for the development of pressure ulcers, subsequently developed an avoidable facility acquired pressure ulcer which was not identified until it had reached an advanced stage. Resident #104 developed a pressure ulcer which was first identified on 11/05/24 as a stage III (full-thickness skin loss in which adipose [fat] is visible) pressure ulcer on the resident's left gluteus with eschar (dead…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity when staff stood over residents as they fed them lunch. This affected two residents (#26 and #48) of twenty four reviewed for dining observation. The facility census was 104.Findings include:1. Medical record review of Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 02/01/25 with diagnoses including; Huntington's disease, ataxia, and dysphagia. Review of the care plan dated 01/30/23 revealed Resident #25 was dependent for eating and required one person assistance with being fed.Review of the minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #25 was severely cognitively impaired and was dependent upon staff for bringing food and/or drink to mouth.2. Medical record review of Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 08/03/23 with diagnoses including; generalized idiopathic epilepsy and epileptic syndromes, Alzheimer's disease, downs syndrome. Review of the care plan dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a safe discharge. This affected one Resident #111 of three residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 104.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #111 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 01/02/26. Diagnoses included atrial fibrillation, depression, mental disorder, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side and essential hypertension.Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #111 had moderately impaired cognition with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of eight, required set up awsistance for eating, substantial assistance with toileting, substantial assistance with bathing, and set up assistance for personal hygiene.Review of the Letter of Guardianship dated 12/02/25 revealed Resident #111 incompetent for an indefinite time period.Review of the Discharge…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to have a baseline care plan that included pain management and hearing loss. This affected one, (Resident #2) of six residents reviewed for the baseline care plan. The facility census was 104.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included discoid lupus erythematosus, depression, polyarthritis, cardiac arrhythmia, cervical disc disorder, other displaced fracture of upper end of left humerus and rheumatic mitral stenosis.Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment still in progress dated 02/09/26 revealed Resident #2 was cognitively intact. Review of the baseline care plan dated 03/27/26 revealed Resident #2's pain was not assessed or added to the baseline care plan and hearing loss with a hearing aide was not assessed or added to the baseline care plan.Review of the medical record revealed Resident #2 revealed a hospital discharge…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, policy review and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents' activity needs were assessed regularly and addressed in the care plans. This affected two Residents #40 and Resident #54 of three residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 104.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dizziness, chronic embolism and thrombosis of unspecified vein, dysphagia, alzheimer's disease, and anxiety disorder.Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #40 had severe cognitive impairment, was dependent with eating, dependent with bathing, and dependent with personal hygiene. Review of the Care Area Assessment Summary (CAA) dated 11/11/25, for Resident #40 revealed activities was triggered for a care area and care planning decision. Review of the care plan for Resident #40 revealed no goals or interventions for activities. Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pain medications were available for a resident. This affected one, (Resident #2) of six residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 104. Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included discoid lupus erythematosus, depression, polyarthritis, cardiac arrhythmia, cervical disc disorder, other displaced fracture of upper end of left humerus and rheumatic mitral stenosis.Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment still in progress dated 02/09/26 revealed Resident #2 was cognitively intact. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #2's hospital discharge orders dated 03/19/26 revealed Oxycodone (opioid) immediate release five milligrams (mg) every four hours as needed.Review of the medical record revealed Resident #2 had physician orders dated 03/27/26 at 2:45 P.M. revealed Oxycodone oral tablet…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary environment. This affected one, (Resident #54) of three residents reviewed for a sanitary environment. The facility census was 104.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included huntington's disease, essential hypertension, ataxia, corticobasal degeneration, cognitive communication deficit, and dysphagia.Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #54 has severe cognitive impairment, required partial assistance with eating, substantial assistance with toileting, substantial assistance with bathing, and partial assistance with personal hygiene.Observation and interview on 04/06/26 at 9:17 A.M. in Resident # 54 room with the Maintenance Director (MD) #82 and the Administrator revealed the floor was covered with small white spots, appearing to be paint chips stuck to floor. Continued observation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, interview with staff at oral surgeon's office, review of the weather history for Cincinnati, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity. This affected one (#12) of two residents reviewed for dignity and respect. The facility census was 102. Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #12 was admitted to facility on 11/09/24. Diagnoses included zygomatic fracture (a break in the cheek bone) and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 required maximum assistance with toileting and dressing and utilized a wheelchair for mobility. Interview with Oral Surgery Office Staff (OSOS) #600 on 09/29/25 at 11:05 A.M. revealed Resident #12 came to the oral surgery clinic at Medical Center (MC) #500 on 01/08/25 for a morning appointment related to her zygomatic fracture. The oral surgery's office (OSO) was called by the MC #500's lobby desk reporting Resident #12 had been dropped off by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-08 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure resident call lights were in working order on the facility's 200-hall. This affected 12 residents (#12, #14, #19, #23, #32, #42, #54, #57, #59, #74, #91, and #94) of 27 residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 95. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 07/27/18. Diagnoses included heart failure, weakness, macular degeneration, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 had moderately impaired cognition and required extensive assistance from staff with bed mobility and toileting and was dependent on staff for transfers. Multiple observations on 02/05/24 between 9:41 A.M. and 11:00 A.M. revealed Resident #14 had a non-functioning call lights and no other means to call for help. 2. Review of the medical record of Resident #23 revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, review of resident council meeting notes, and record review, the facility failed to address resident concerns timely and ensure staff only attend the meetings if the residents invited them to attend. This affected three (#47, #78, and #88) of four residents who attended the resident council meeting. The facility census was 95. Findings include: Review of the Resident Council meeting notes from September 2023 to January 2024 revealed there was no evidence the facility was following up with the concerns voiced from the residents during resident council meetings. Several staff members attended each resident council meeting. 1. Record review for Resident #47 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included morbid obesity, anxiety disorder, and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/29/24, revealed Resident #47 was cognitively alert. 2. Record review for Resident #78 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE].…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, staff interviews, review of the facility's policy, and observations, the facility failed to ensure a resident's safety devices for the prevention of falls were functioning and failed to complete a thorough fall investigation into a resident's fall. This affected two (Residents #27 and #95) of seven residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 95. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #95 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #95 included cerebral infarction and history of fracture of left femur prior to admission. Review of the Minimum Data Set, (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #95 had severely impaired cognition and required partial assistance with bed mobility. Review of the plan of care, dated 12/21/23, revealed Resident #95 was at risk for falls due to decreased mobility and included an intervention of pressure alarm to the bed, ordered on 01/20/24. Observation on 02/08/24 at 1:56 P.M. with Licensed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH