Harmony Court Rehab And Nursing
6969 Glenmeadow Lane, Cincinnati, OH 45237 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (513) 351-7007 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (74) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $100,887 in federal fines (most recent 2023-11-08)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (77%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 0.9% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.4% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 92.7% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.6% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 1.4% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 32.5% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.8% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.1% | 3.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 5.9% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.9% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.6% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 45.2% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 101.8 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.73 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.74 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 77% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
74 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 62 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY :THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENCE OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY Based on record review, staff interview, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRI), review of the facility investigation, review of the local weather report, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent a cognitively impaired resident from eloping from the facility. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy when Resident #70 left the facility without staff knowledge, was missing approximately three hours and was found approximately 0.8 miles from the facility by a facility staff member before returning to the facility. This affected one (Resident #70) of three residents reviewed for risk of elopement. The facility identified 26 residents at risk for elopement. The facility census was 101. On 04/02/26 at 1:05 P.M. the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), and Director of Clinical Operations (DCO) were notified Immediate Jeopardy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-12-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of hospital records, review of hospice notes, review of a transportation report, observations, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #87) did not experience neglect. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious harm, injury, and/or negative health outcomes when on 12/03/23 Resident #87, whose left hand was discolored and painful, did not receive an x-ray as ordered, was not medicated for pain, and was not assessed by a physician or appropriately assessed by a nurse. She was not seen by a physician, and the primary care physician was not made aware of her condition. There was no documentation that Resident #87's radial pulse or capillary refill was assessed for appropriate blood flow to her left hand. X-rays were ordered on 12/03/23 but not completed until 12/07/23. Pain medication was ordered on 12/03/23 but not given until 12/06/23. The hospice physician ordered Resident #87 to be sent to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-03 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional and sanitary environment. This affected one (Residents #78) and had the potential to affect all of the residents in rooms 302, 304, 317, and 325. The facility census was 96 residents. Findings include: 1. Interview on 06/01/26 at 11:59 A.M with Resident #78 on confirmed the resident had a leak in his ceiling. Staff had placed containers in the resident's room to catch the water that leaked in while it was raining the previous week but no one has come to repair the leak. Interview on 06/03/26 at 12:00 P.M. with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #385 confirmed Resident #78 did have a leak in his ceiling during the previous week's heavy rain. Interview on 06/03/26 at 3:36 P.M. with Clinical Director (CD) #607 and the Administrator confirmed they were unaware of the leak in Resident #78's room. CD #607 stated the roof needed some work and the facility needed to fix the leak in Resident #78's room. 2.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, review of pharmacy guidelines, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure insulin vials were properly labeled and stored. This affected five Residents (#26, #55, #85, #86 and #99) of the 24 residents with medications stored in the unit-100 medication cart. The facility census was 101 residents. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 09/12/24 with diagnoses of diabetes mellitus type two and chronic kidney disease. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #26 revealed an order dated 09/04/25 for Degludec insulin 10 units at bedtime. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #26 dated March 2026 revealed the resident received Degludec insulin at bedtime on every day of the month. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #55 revealed an admission date of 05/04/23 with diagnoses of diabetes mellitus type two and schizoaffective disorder. Review of physician's orders for Resident #55 revealed an order dated 12/17/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to provide residents with a dignified dining experience. This affected three (Residents #21, #51 and #54) but had the potential to all affect the 99 facility-identified residents who received meals from the kitchen. The facility census was 101 residents. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 02/25/25 with diagnoses including end-stage renal disease (ESRD) hypertension, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #21 dated 03/04/26 revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and required set up assistance for eating. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed an admission date of 05/16/24 with diagnoses including dementia and major depressive disorder. Review of the MDS assessment for Resident #51 dated 02/09/26 revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and required supervision for eating. 3. Review of the medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure call lights were kept within resident reach. This affected one (Resident #94) of three residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 101 residents. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #94 revealed an admission date of 09/09/24 with diagnoses including disorganized schizophrenia, depression, and anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #94 dated 03/05/26 revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment and required set-up assistance with oral hygiene, supervision for toileting, bathing, dressing and personal hygiene, and was independent for eating, bed mobility and transfers. Observation on 03/30/26 at 11:09 A.M. of Resident #94 revealed the resident was lying in bed and the call light cord was lying on the floor out of the resident's reach. The call light cord was too short to reach from the wall to the resident's bed. Interview on 03/30/36 at 11:10 A.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #344 verified Resident #94…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed ensure resident rooms were clean and sanitary. This affected one (Resident #94) of three residents reviewed for physical environment. The facility census was 101 residents.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #94 revealed an admission date of 09/09/24 with diagnoses including disorganized schizophrenia, depression, and anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #94 dated 03/05/26 revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment and required set-up assistance with oral hygiene, supervision for toileting, bathing, dressing and personal hygiene, and was independent for eating, bed mobility and transfers. Observation on 03/30/26 at 11:09 A.M. of Resident #94's room revealed there were spiderwebs above the entire width of the resident's sliding glass door which was approximately six feet wide. Interview on 03/30/36 at 11:10 A.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #344 verified there were spiderwebs above Resident #94's sliding glass door. This…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide nail care for dependent residents. This affected two (Residents #21 and #82) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. The facility census was 101 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 02/25/25 with diagnoses including end-stage renal disease (ESRD) hypertension, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #21 dated 03/04/26 revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and required staff assistance with ADLs. Review of the care plan for Resident #21 dated 02/25/25 revealed the resident had an ADL deficit. Interventions included staff were to assist the resident with personal hygiene. Observation on 03/31/26 at 9:27 A.M. revealed Resident #21's fingernails were long and jagged with an unknown brown substance underneath the nails. Interview on 03/31/26 with Resident #21…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff practiced proper hand hygiene while delivering meal trays to residents. This affected three (Residents #21, #51, #54) and had the potential to affect the 99 facility-identified residents who received meals prepared in the facility kitchen. The facility census was 101 residents. Findings include: Observation on 03/31/26 from 9:31 A.M. to 9:38 A.M. revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #267 delivered breakfast meal trays in the 100-nursing unit dining room to Residents #21, #51 and #54 and failed to sanitize hands before and after passing the meal trays to the residents. CNA #267 opened Resident #21's milk carton and did not sanitize her hands before and after assisting the resident. Interview on 03/31/26 at 9:38 A.M. with CNA #267 verified she should have sanitized her hands before and after passing a meal tray to each resident. Interview on 04/03/26 at 11:25 A.M. with Infection Control Preventionist #310 verified staff are to sanitize hands before and after delivering a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of Self-Report Incidents (SRI) and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy when an allegation of sexual abuse was reported. This affected two Residents (#01 and #12) out of the three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 106. 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #01 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included abscess of right foot, major depressive disorder, morbid obesity, hypertensive retinopathy, pulmonary embolism, insomnia, intellectual disability (ID), essential primary hypotension, and diabetes mellitus (DM). The resident was housed in the secured Memory Care Unit (MCU) and had a guardian related to mental disability. Review of physician orders for Resident #01 dated 08/16/23, revealed resident was ordered to be housed in the secured unit for safety of self and others related to major depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of Self-Report Incidents (SRI) and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse. This affected two Residents (#01 and #12) out of the three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 106. 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #01 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included abscess of right foot, major depressive disorder, morbid obesity, hypertensive retinopathy, pulmonary embolism, insomnia, intellectual disability (ID), essential primary hypotension, and diabetes mellitus (DM). The resident was housed in the secured Memory Care Unit (MCU) and had a guardian related to mental disability. Review of physician orders for Resident #01 dated 08/16/23, revealed resident was ordered to be housed in the secured unit for safety of self and others related to major depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #01 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, and facility policy review. The facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse. This affected two Residents (#01, #12) out of three residents (#01, #03, #12) reviewed. The facility census was 106. 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #01 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included abscess of right foot, major depressive disorder, morbid obesity, hypertensive retinopathy, pulmonary embolism, insomnia, intellectual disability (ID), essential primary hypotension, and diabetes mellitus (DM). The resident was housed in the secured Memory Care Unit (MCU) and had a guardian related to mental disability. Review of physician orders for Resident #01 dated 08/16/23, revealed resident was ordered to be housed in the secured unit for safety of self and others related to major depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #01 was cognitively intact. The resident was independent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 62 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure physician visits were signed and dated in a timely manner. This affected two Residents (#01, #12) out of two residents reviewed. The facility census was 106. 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #01 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included abscess of right foot, major depressive disorder, morbid obesity, hypertensive retinopathy, pulmonary embolism, insomnia, intellectual disability (ID), essential primary hypotension, and diabetes mellitus (DM). The resident was housed in the secured Memory Care Unit (MCU) and had a guardian related to mental disability. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #01 was cognitively intact. The resident was independent or required minimal assistance with activities of daily living (ADL). Review of the Nurse Practitioner (NP) progress note for Resident #01 recorded as a late entry for 01/28/26 at 5:42 P.M. and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were given as prescribed. This affected one (#15) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 107.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 5/30/25. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), major depressive disorder and syndrome of inappropriate secretion of anti-diuretic hormone.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she was cognitively intact and required supervision with eating, bed mobility, toileting hygiene and transfers.Observation on 10/29/25 at 10:19 A.M. of the medication pass with Registered Nurse (RN) #100 for Resident #15 revealed he prepared Fluphenazine (antipsychotic) one 10 milligram (mg) tablet (tab), Hydroxyzine Pamoate (antihistamine) 25 mg, Metoprolol (high blood pressure) 25 mg tab, Lamotrigine (Bipolar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, observations and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered resulting in three medication errors out of 27 opportunities observed which resulted in an 11.11 percent (%) error rate. This affected one (#15) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 107.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed admission date of 5/30/25. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), major depressive disorder and syndrome of inappropriate secretion of anti-diuretic hormone.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she was cognitively intact and required supervision with eating, bed mobility, toileting hygiene and transfers.Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed a physician order dated 08/19/25 for Fluphenazine Hydrochloride (schizoaffective disorder) 10 milligram (mg) give two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of medication. This had the ability to affect all 25 residents on the hall. The facility census was 107.Findings include:Observation on 10/29/25 at 10:09 A.M. of the medication pass revealed RN#100 prepared medication for Resident #14 removed the medication cup from the cart, turned in the opposite direction, walked approximately five feet down the hall and entered Resident #14's room. The unattended medication cart was left unlocked in the hall for approximately four minutes.Interview on 10/29/25 at 10:09 A.M. with RN #100 acknowledged the medication cart should not be left unlocked if unattended. RN #100 verified he he did not lock the medication cart and left it unsecured in the hallway. Review of the facility policy, Medication storage in the facility dated 11/11 revealed medications should be stored safety and securely.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines the facility failed to ensure proper infection control measures were followed during medication administration. This had the potential to affect one Resident (#14) of four reviewed. The facility census was 107.Findings include:Review of medical record for Resident #14 revealed admission date of 12/13/17. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), hemiplegia, bipolar disorder and depression. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed he had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 indicating impaired cognition and he required supervision with eating, bed mobility, toileting hygiene and transfers.Observation on 10/29/25 at 9:58 A.M. of the medication pass with Registered Nurse (RN) #100 for Resident #14 revealed RN #100 unlocked the medication cart and removed the medication card from the drawer of the cart. He was observed punching the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from verbal abuse by the staff. This affected one (Resident #104) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 112 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #104 revealed an admission date of 02/13/25 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and aphasia. Review of the facility SRI for Resident #104 initiated 04/19/25 revealed the facility substantiated an allegation of abuse per Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #500 towards Resident #104. On 04/19/25 at approximately 5:30 P.M. Resident #104 and another nurse witnessed LPN #500 using profane language and speaking in a verbally abusive manner towards the resident. The facility reported LPN #500's actions to the Ohio Board of Nursing (OBN) and terminated the nurse. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to prevent resident elopements. This affected one (Resident #45) of three residents reviewed for elopements. The facility census was 112 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #45 revealed an admission date of 11/20/23 with diagnoses including atherosclerotic heart disease, Alzheimer's disease, psychotic disorder with delusions and hallucinations, and Parkinson's disease. Review of the elopement risk assessment for Resident #45 dated 01/23/25 revealed the resident was at risk for elopement due to a history of wandering with a pattern, goal-directed wandering, and wandering that might affect the resident's safety and the privacy of others. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #45 dated 03/28/25 revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, was independently mobile with a walker, and required supervision with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff donned appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) prior to provision of care for residents on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP.) This affected two (Residents #11 and #13) of three residents reviewed. The facility census was 107 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 02/27/23 with diagnoses including hypotension, gastrotomy, colostomy, obesity, and dysphagia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #13 dated 12/07/24 revealed the resident had mild cognitive deficits and required substantial to total dependence with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of care plan for Resident #13 dated 09/23/24 revealed the resident required EBP related to an indwelling medical device (colostomy) regardless of multi drug resistant organisms (MDROs). Interventions included staff should don gowns and gloves prior to and during high-contact resident care activities that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility Self-Reported Incident Reviews (SRIs), staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure allegations of misappropriation were reported in a timely manner to the Ohio Department of Health (ODH). This affected one (Residents #12) of 12 residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 110 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility SRI initiated 09/30/24 revealed the facility substantiated an allegation of misappropriation of Resident #12's narcotic medication, oxycodone per Registered Nurse (RN) #175. The facility substantiated misappropriation had occurred and RN #175 was terminated. Interview on 10/30/24 at 9:00 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed she received a text from Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #225 on Friday 09/27/24 at 6:45 P.M. with a photograph of a Resident #12's controlled substance record with Registered Nurse (RN) #175's initials signing out doses of medication but on some of the lines Resident #19's name was written in the margin. The DON confirmed she attempted to call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of Self-Reported Incident Reviews (SRIs) staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of misappropriation of resident medications and failed to protect residents during the investigation. This affected one (Residents #12) of 12 residents reviewed for misappropriation and had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 110 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility SRI initiated 09/30/24 revealed the facility substantiated an allegation of misappropriation of Resident #12's narcotic medication, oxycodone per Registered Nurse (RN) #175. The facility substantiated misappropriation had occurred and RN #175 was terminated. Interview on 10/30/24 at 9:00 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed she received a text from Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #225 on Friday 09/27/24 at 6:45 P.M. with a photograph of a Resident #12's controlled substance record with Registered Nurse (RN) #175's initials signing out doses of medication but on some of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents' toilets were functioning properly. This affected two (Residents #58 and #63) of two residents reviewed for physical environment. The facility census was 102 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #63 revealed an admission date of 01/24/23 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease with late onset and adult failure to thrive. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #63 dated 12/26/23 revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs). Observation on 01/30/24 at 12:45 P.M. of Resident #63's bathroom revealed the bathroom floor was covered with water and pieces of toilet paper and paper towels. A large piece of clear plastic was on the bathroom floor beside the bathroom door which had been used to cover the toilet. The toilet was out of order and did not flush properly. Interviews on 01/30/24 at 12:55 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #163 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the water temperature in residents' rooms was within safe temperature limits to prevent possible scalding injuries. This affected two (Residents #35 and #38) of two residents reviewed for physical environment. The facility census was 102 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 01/17/24 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, anxiety disorder, blindness of right eye and low vision of left eye. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #35 dated 01/21/24 revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and required supervision and verbal cues for all activities of daily living (ADLs). Observation on 01/30/24 at 2:03 P.M. with Maintenance Director (MD) #210 revealed the water temperature of the Residents #35's bathroom sink was 127 degrees Fahrenheit (F.) Interview on 01/30/24 at 2:15 P.M. with MD #210 confirmed the water temperature for Resident #35's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-26 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of a food menu, review of a food substitution log, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure approved menus were followed. This affected all residents except seven (#43, #75, #77, #96, #353, #354, and #359) residents that received no food by mouth. The facility census was 108. Findings include: Review of the facility's menu for 12/06/23 revealed regular diets were to receive three (3) ounces (oz) of barbeque chicken, four (4) oz of macaroni and cheese, 4 oz of baked beans, one square of cornbread, and 4 oz of seasoned fruit. Mechanical diets were to receive 3 oz of ground barbeque chicken, 4 oz of macaroni and cheese, 4 oz of mashed baked beans, one square of cornbread, and one piece of fresh banana. Pureed diets were to receive 3 oz of pureed barbeque chicken, 4 oz of pureed macaroni and cheese, 4 oz of pureed baked beans, two (2) oz of pureed bread, and 4 oz of puree banana. Review of the facility's undated substitution log revealed potatoes were substituted instead of macaroni and cheese and vegetables were used as a substitute…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, review of a facility provided list of residents by diet type, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen and equipment were clean and sanitary, and resident food and drink items were stored in a manner to prevent spoilage. This affected all resident with the exception of seven (#43, #75, #77, #96, #353, #354, and #359) residents identified by the facility that received no food by mouth. The facility census was 108. Findings include: 1. Observation of the facility's kitchen on 12/04/23 at 10:29 A.M. revealed yellow debris on the top of the dishwasher, a pink substance on the ledge of the ice machine that came off on a paper towel when Dietary Supervisor (DS) #80 wiped the ledge, a black substance built up around the rim of the ice cream cooler that came off on a paper towel when DS #80 wiped the ledge, and a brown and black substance on the floor below the preparation sink. There was also an area in the ceiling that appeared to have paint film hanging down above the plate storage cart. Interview with DS #80 on 12/04/23 at 10:29…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, review of water management logs, review of infection control logs, review of staff personnel files, review of a water management plan, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure newly hired employees and residents admitted to the facility were timely screened for tuberculosis, failed to ensure resident personal use items were clean and sanitary, failed to ensure testing measures were maintained to prevent bacteria growth in the water system, failed to adequately track resident infections, and failed to maintain proper infection control measures when performing resident care. This directly affected Resident #96 observed during tracheostomy care, Resident #355 observed with an unsanitary personal fan in use, three (#02, #83, and #90) of five residents reviewed for tuberculosis screening, and one (State Tested Nurse Aide #15) of five newly hired staff members at the facility. Additionally, the failure to maintain a program to prevent and monitor for bacteria growth in the water system, and a system to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-26 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Review of record review, staff interviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to implement the antibiotic stewardship program routinely to ensure infections and antibiotics were monitored. This had the potential to affect all 108 residents in the facility. Findings include: Interview on 12/12/23 at 10:23 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse Infection Control (LPNIC) #131 stated the facility didn't monitor any residents who utilized antibiotics four months, which included April 2023, May 2023, June 2023, and July 2023. LPNIC #131 stated she was hired in August 2023, and she started the monitoring of residents who were on antibiotics in August 2023. Interview on 12/12/23 at 1:00 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified the facility was not monitoring the antibiotic stewardship and residents with infections from 04/2023 through 07/31/23. Review of the facility's records dated from 04/01/23 through 07/31/23 revealed there was no documentation supplied by the facility that showed that infections and antibiotics used by residents were being followed. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were not served meals in disposable Styrofoam food boxes. This affected 11 (Residents #12, #18, #20, #32, #47, #54, #76, #84, #89, #93 and #303) of 11 observed for meal services. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure a resident's urinary catheter bag was covered for dignity. This affected one (Resident #361) of one resident observed for catheter bag coverage. The facility census was 108. Findings include: 1. Observation of tray line in the kitchen on 12/06/23 at 11:41 A.M. revealed Dietary [NAME] #64 served lunch to Residents #12, #18, #20, #32, #47, #54, #76, #84, #89, #93 and #303 in disposable Styrofoam food boxes. During an interview on 12/06/23 at 11:41 A.M., Dietary [NAME] #64 and Dietary Supervisor #80 revealed the kitchen was out of plate covers and had to serve Residents #12, #18, #20, #32, #47, #54, #76, #84, #89, #93 and #303 lunch in disposable Styrofoam food boxes. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #361 revealed an admission date on 11/29/23. Diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, review of a food recipe, and review of a facility list of residents by diet type, the facility failed to ensure pureed food items were prepared following an approved recipe to conserve the nutritional value. This affected five (#19, #31, #34, #44, and #98) of five residents identified by the facility that receive pureed diets. The facility census was 108. Findings include: Review of the recipe for seasoned green beans, dated 11/22/15, revealed staff should remove the desired number of servings and add nutritive liquid, milk, or broth and blend until the desired consistency for pureed diets. Further review revealed approved thickener could be added to achieve the desired consistency. Observation of the kitchen on 12/06/23 at 11:41 A.M. revealed the pureed green beans appeared thick and light green in color with streaks of dark green throughout the food. Interview with [NAME] #64 on 12/06/23 at 11:41 A.M. revealed the pureed green beans were mixed with mashed potatoes. [NAME] #64 stated the facility was out of thickener and she added the mashed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-26 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen hood was maintained in a safe condition. This affected all residents except seven residents (#43, #75, #77, #96, #353, #354, and #359) who received no food by mouth. The facility census was 108. Findings include: Observation of the facility's kitchen on 12/04/23 at 10:29 A.M. revealed metal pieces of the kitchen hood appeared to be flaking off above the stove. Interview with Dietary Supervisor #80 on 12/04/23 at 10:29 A.M. verified metal pieces of the kitchen hood appeared to be flaking off above the stove.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was within reach and a resident's privacy curtain were in good repair. This affected two (#42 and #62) residents out of 35 residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 108. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #62's medical record revealed Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side. Review of Resident #62's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and required one-person extensive assistance with transfers, dressing, toileting, and bathing. Resident #62 also required supervision with eating. Review of Resident #62's care plan dated 08/03/23 revealed interventions in place for falls including the call light should be kept accessible. Observation on 12/05/23 at 9:17 A.M. revealed Resident #62's call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's code status was accurate in the medical record. This affected one (Resident #62) of one reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 108. Findings include: Review of Resident #62's medical record revealed Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side. Review of Resident #62's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and required one-person extensive assistance with transfers, dressing, toileting, and bathing. Resident #62 also required supervision with eating. Review of the care plan dated 04/17/23 revealed Resident #62 had chosen to be a full code. Interventions included complete and update advanced directives document and for staff to review advanced directives on file. Review of the physician order dated 04/17/23 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's family member was made aware of an injury the resident incurred. The facility also failed to ensure the resident's primary care physician was consulted when the resident had a change of condition. This affected one (Resident #87) of one reviewed for notification. The facility census was 108. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #87 revealed an admission date of 01/24/23 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease with late onset, muscle weakness, dementia without behavioral disturbance, protein-calorie malnutrition, adult failure to thrive, anorexia, and osteoarthritis. Resident #87 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] at 5:30 P.M. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she had severe cognitive impairment and at that time she was assessed as not having pain. She was noted as being under hospice care. Review of Resident #87's facesheet revealed her son was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-26 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were given a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN) when being cut from skilled services and remaining in the facility. This affected two (Residents #154 and #155) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The facility census was 108. Findings included: 1. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #154 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 10/18/23. His diagnoses included type II diabetes with foot ulcer, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, end stage renal disease, hypertension secondary to endocrine disorders, atherosclerotic heart disease of the native coronary artery, diabetic polyneuropathy, chest pain, and personal history of transient ischemic attack and cerebral infarction without residual deficits. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #154's Brief Interview for Mental Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's walls were free from patches and a resident's vent and ceiling were free of debris. This affected three (Resident #16, #60, and #69) residents of three residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 108. Findings include: 1. Review of the Resident #69's medical record revealed Resident #69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease unspecified, respiratory disorders in diseases classified elsewhere, type two diabetes mellitus, Alzheimer's disease with early onset and adult failure to thrive. Review of Resident #69's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required set up assistance with bathing and was independent with all other activities of daily living (ADLs). Observation of Resident #69's room on 12/04/23 at 12:25 P.M. revealed several large patches on his wall including a patch…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-26 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, observation, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from restraints. This affected one (Resident #355) of one resident reviewed for the use of restraints. The facility census was 108. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #355 revealed an admission date 12/01/23. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, chronic respiratory failure, tracheostomy, gastric tube, fracture of part of body of right mandible, cocaine abuse, and psychoactive substance abuse. Review of the baseline care plan dated 12/01/23 revealed no interventions in place for the use of a restraint to Resident #355's right hand. Further review of the medical record from 12/01/23 through 12/03/23 revealed no assessments for the use of restraints/mitt to the resident's right hand. Review of Resident #355's physician orders revealed no orders for restraint use or monitoring. Review of the physician order dated 12/04/23 revealed an order to discontinue the hand mitt. Review of the health status note dated 12/02/23, documented by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, review of Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of misappropriation and an allegation of injury of unknown origin were reported to the state agency. This affected two (Residents #69 and #87) of two residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 108. Findings include: 1. Review of the Resident #69's chart revealed Resident #69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes mellitus, Alzheimer's disease with early onset, and adult failure to thrive. Review of Resident #69's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required set up assistance with bathing and was independent with all other activities of daily living (ADLs). Interview with Resident #69 on 12/04/23 at 12:25 P.M. revealed Resident #69's sister stole 6500 dollars from him by taking out 500 dollars a day on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, review of Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of misappropriation and an allegation of injury of unknown origin were thoroughly investigated. This affected two (Residents #69 and #87) of two residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 108. Findings include: 1. Review of the Resident #69's chart revealed Resident #69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes mellitus, Alzheimer's disease with early onset, and adult failure to thrive. Review of Resident #69's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required set up assistance with bathing and was independent with all other activities of daily living (ADLs). Interview with Resident #69 on 12/04/23 at 12:25 P.M. revealed Resident #69's sister stole 6500 dollars from him by taking out 500 dollars a day on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-26 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's dental status was accurately coded on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. This affected one (Resident #38)of one resident reviewed for accuracy of resident assessments. The facility census was 108. Findings include: 1. Review Resident #38's chart revealed Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia, other low back pain, phantom limb syndrome with pain, acquired absence of left leg above knee, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, heart failure, type two diabetes mellitus without complications, unspecified convulsions, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #38's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, and toileting. Resident #38 was independent with eating and required limited assistance with transfers. Personal hygiene only occurred…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-26 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's baseline care plan addressed a resident's risk for skin impairment. This affected one (Resident #62) of three residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 108. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #62 revealed an admission date of 04/14/23. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis, major depressive disorder, dementia, dependence on wheelchair, and cognitive deficit. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 was cognitively intact. Resident #62 required extensive one-person physical assistance for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. Review of the admission skin assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 had skin issues including a skin tear. Review of the weekly skin assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 had a stage one pressure ulcer tot he left heel measuring 3.0 centimeters (cm) by 3.0 cm…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans reflected the resident's current status. This affected two (Residents #57 and #42) of five residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 108. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #57's clinical record revealed an admission date of 05/09/23. Diagnoses included hydronephrosis with renal and ureteral calculous obstruction, liver cell carcinoma, type II diabetes, and gastritis. Review of Resident #57's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 11/03/23 revealed she was cognitively intact. The assessment revealed she was on insulin seven days during the look back period and was receiving the following medication: an antianxiety, antidepressant, anticoagulant, antibiotic, and a hypoglycemic. Review of Resident #57's physician orders revealed she was prescribed Docusate Sodium Capsule 100 milligrams (mg) to give one capsule by mouth two times a day for constipation, MiraLax Powder (Polyethylene Glycol…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was updated to reflect a resident's risk for skin impairment. This affected one (Resident #62) of three residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 108. Findings inlcude: Review of the medical record for Resident #62 revealed an admission date of 04/14/23. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis, major depressive disorder, dementia, dependence on wheelchair, and cognitive deficit. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 was cognitively intact. Resident #62 required extensive one-person physical assistance for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. Review of the admission skin assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 had skin issues including a skin tear. Review of the weekly skin assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 had a stage one pressure ulcer tot he left heel measuring 3.0 centimeters (cm) by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received routine nail care and assistance with grooming. This affected three (#38, #49 and #62) residents out of six residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. The facility census was 108. Findings include: 1. Review of the Resident #38's chart revealed Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia, other low back pain, phantom limb syndrome with pain, acquired absence of left leg above knee, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, heart failure, type two diabetes mellitus without complications, unspecified convulsions, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #38's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, and toileting. Resident #38 was independent with eating and required limited assistance with transfers. Personal hygiene…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to reposition and check dependent residents to see if they needed incontinence care in a timely manner. This affected two (Residents #77 and #96) of two residents reviewed for repositioning. The facility census was 108. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #77 revealed an admission date of 12/23/21. Diagnoses included anoxic brain damage, epilepsy, tracheostomy, and altered mental status. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #77 was severely cognitively impaired. The resident was totally dependent upon staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. Review of the plan of care dated 10/14/23 revealed Resident #77 was at risk for incontinence with interventions including the use of a condom catheter, providing incontinence care every two hours, and as needed, keep call light within reach, monitor of signs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-26 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received routine podiatry care. This affected one (Resident #38) of one resident reviewed for podiatry services. The facility census was 108. Findings include: Review of the Resident #38's chart revealed Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia, other low back pain, phantom limb syndrome with pain, acquired absence of left leg above knee, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, heart failure, type two diabetes mellitus without complications, unspecified convulsions, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #38's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, and toileting. Resident #38 was independent with eating and required limited assistance with transfers. Personal hygiene only occurred once or twice during the assessment period. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for two residents (#2 and #14) of two residents reviewed for falls. Facility census was 108. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 04/11/23. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, vascular dementia, and epilepsy. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 was cognitively impaired. Resident #14 was dependent upon staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and utilized a wheelchair. Review of the plan of care dated 11/02/23 revealed Resident #14 was at risk for falls. Interventions included anticipate and meet resident's needs, educate the resident and family about safety, encourage to wear nonskid footwear, follow facility fall protocol, keep the call light accessible, and give reacher to allow resident to pick up objects. Observation on 12/13/23 at 2:10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the medical record, observation, interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to provide safe positioning of a urinary Foley catheter bag. This affected one (Resident #355) of two residents reviewed for positioning of a catheter bag. The facility census was 108. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #355 revealed an admission date 12/01/23. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, chronic respiratory failure, tracheostomy, gastric tube, fracture of part of body of right mandible, cocaine abuse, and psychoactive substance abuse. Interview and observation on 12/04/23 at 12:28 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #101 revealed Resident #335's catheter bag was lying flat on the floor at the foot of the bed. Interview and observation on 12/04/23 at 3:50 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed Resident #355's catheter bag was on the floor at the foot of the bed. Interview on 12/06/23 at 6:30 A.M. with the DON revealed Resident #355's catheter was discontinued because there was no reason for him to have the catheter. Further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-26 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to administer supplemental tube feeding as ordered. This affected one (#43) of three residents reviewed for tube feedings. The facility census was 108. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date 11/07/23. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, anemia, gastrostomy status, dysphagia, and tracheostomy status. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #43 was assessed as severely cognitively impaired. Resident #43 was dependent for toileting, dressing, putting on and and taking off footwear, and oral care. Review of a plan of care dated 11/07/23 revealed Resident #43 required tube feeding related to dysphagia. Interventions included the resident needed the head of bed elevated 45 degrees during and thirty minutes after tube feed, discuss with the resident and family any concerns about tube…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's oxygen tubing was dated and changed timely, and failed to ensure oxygen tubing was appropriately connected to the concentrator. This affected two (#49 and #69) of two residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. The facility census was 108. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #69's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses including unspecified chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, respiratory disorders in diseases classified elsewhere, type two diabetes mellitus, Alzheimer's disease with early onset, and adult failure to thrive. Review of Resident #69's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact, required set up assistance with bathing, and was independent with all other activities of daily living (ADLs). Resident #69 was on oxygen therapy. Observation of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-26 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided interventions for pain management in a timely manner. This affected one (#87) of 32 residents reviewed for pain control. The facility census was 108. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #87 revealed an admission date of 01/24/23 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease with late onset, muscle weakness, dementia without behavioral disturbance, protein-calorie malnutrition, adult failure to thrive, anorexia, and osteoarthritis. Resident #87 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] at 5:30 P.M. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment and was assessed to have no pain. Resident #87 was noted as being under hospice care. Review of Resident #87's care plan dated 03/21/23 revealed the resident had the potential for pain with a goal to be free of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-26 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on personnel file review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure state tested nurse aides (STNAs) received performance evaluations at least every 12 months. This affected two (#03 and #24) of two STNA personnel files reviewed for performance evaluations. The facility census was 108. Findings include: 1. Review of STNA #24's personnel file revealed STNA #24 was hired at the facility on 06/14/00. Further review of STNA #24's personnel file revealed STNA #24 did not receive an annual evaluation from 06/14/22 to 06/14/23. Interview on 12/11/23 at 10:17 A.M., with Human Resource #90 verified STNA #24 did not receive an annual evaluation from 06/14/22 to 06/14/23. 2. Review of STNA #03's personnel file revealed STNA #03 was hired at the facility on 03/04/09. Further review of STNA #03's personnel file revealed STNA #03 did not receive an annual evaluation from 03/04/22 to 03/04/23. Interview on 12/11/23 at 10:17 A.M., with Human Resource #90 verified STNA #03 did not receive an annual evaluation from 03/04/22 to 03/04/23. Review of the facility's undated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations and irregularities were addressed by the physician in a timely manner. This affected two (#09 and 57) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 108. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #09's chart revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included psychotic disorder with hallucinations due to known physiological condition, obsessive compulsive disorder, major depressive disorder, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere unspecified severity with agitation, and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #09's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, and toileting. Resident #09 required total dependence with transfers and personal hygiene, and supervision with eating. Review of Resident #09's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure gradual dose reductions were attempted in a timely manner and failed to ensure residents had appropriate indications for use of antipsychotic medications. This affected two (#09 and #42) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 108. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #09's chart revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included psychotic disorder with hallucinations due to known physiological condition, obsessive compulsive disorder, major depressive disorder, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere unspecified severity with agitation, and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #09's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, and toileting. Resident #09 required total dependence with transfers and personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to timely administered medications as ordered resulting in a medication error rate greater than five percent (%). There were two medication errors observed out of 27 opportunities for a medication error rate of 7.4%. This affected one (#98) of five residents observed during medication administration. The census was 108. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #98 revealed an admission date 08/25/23. Diagnoses included human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease, respiratory failure, feeding difficulties, and major depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #98 had a Brief Interview Mental Status of 09 that indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #98 required extensive one-person physical assistance for bed mobility, dressing, eating, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Review of a plan of care dated 12/01/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered by the physician resulting in significant medication errors. This affected two (#42 and #98) out of five residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 108. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #98 revealed an admission date 08/25/23. Diagnoses included human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease, respiratory failure, feeding difficulties, and major depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #98 had a Brief Interview Mental Status of 09 that indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #98 required extensive one-person physical assistance for bed mobility, dressing, eating, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Review of a plan of care dated 12/01/23 revealed Resident #98 had HIV/AIDS (Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome) and was at risk for rapid physical or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-26 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident received routine dental care. This affected one (#38) of two residents reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 108. Findings include: Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included paranoid schizophrenia, other low back pain, phantom limb syndrome with pain, acquired absence of the left leg above the knee, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, heart failure, type two diabetes mellitus without complications, unspecified convulsions, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #38's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, and toileting. Resident #38 was independent with eating and required limited assistance with transfers. Further review of the MDS assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications administered to residents were accurately documented in the medical record. This affected one (#87) out of 32 residents reviewed for medical record documentation. The facility census was 108. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #87 revealed an admission date of 01/24/23 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease with late onset, muscle weakness, dementia without behavioral disturbance, protein-calorie malnutrition, adult failure to thrive, anorexia, and osteoarthritis. Resident #87 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] at 5:30 P.M. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #87 was assessed with severe cognitive impairment and was assessed as not having pain. The resident was noted as being under hospice care. Review of Resident #87's narcotic count sheet for the pain medication Norco 5-325 milligrams (mg) to give…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-26 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident call lights were in working order. This affected three (#38, #60, and #69) of 35 residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 108. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included paranoid schizophrenia, other low back pain, acquired absence of left leg above knee, bipolar disorder, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #38's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, and toileting. Observation of Resident #38's room on 12/05/23 at 9:27 A.M. revealed Resident #38's call light was not functioning or turning on in the room, hallway, or nursing station. Interview with Resident #38 on 12/05/23 at 9:27 A.M. revealed her call light had not worked for a couple of days. Interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-26 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review, review of the facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to the facility failed to ensure a state tested nurse aide (STNA) received a minimum of 12 hours of in services or training per year. This affected one of two STNAs reviewed for STNA in services. This had the potential to affect all 108 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #24's personnel file revealed STNA #24 was hired at the facility on 06/14/2000. Further review of STNA #24's personnel file revealed STNA #24 did not receive any in services or training from 06/14/22 to 06/14/23. Interview on 12/11/23 at 10:17 A.M. with Human Resource #90 verified STNA #24 did not receive any in services or training from 06/14/22 to 06/14/23. Review of the facility's undated personnel policy revealed STNAs are required to complete twelve hours of in services per calendar year.
- Potential for harm · E2020-02-27 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of facility initiated transfer notification, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide each resident with a notice before transfer/discharge that include all information required in the contents of the notice. This affected four residents (#13, #21, #73, and #92) of five reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 97. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbance, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, psychosis, osteoporosis, major depressive disorder, hypertension, and dysphagia. The resident had a legal guardian. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] was reviewed revealed the resident had severely impaired memory and recall, and required the physical assistance of at least one staff person for all activities of daily living (ADLs), with the exception of eating for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, shower schedule review, and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary care and services to maintain good grooming and hygiene. This affected five residents (#63, #72, #73, #83, and #95) of five reviewed for ADLs. The facility census was 97. Findings include: 1. Review of the medial record revealed Resident #73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbance, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, psychosis, osteoporosis, major depressive disorder, hypertension, and dysphagia. Review of the minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired memory and recall, and required the physical assistance of one to two staff persons for all ADLs, with the exception of eating for which she required only supervision. The assessment specified the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2020-02-27 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview the facility failed to provide an ongoing activity program to meet each resident's individual needs and preference. This affected six residents ( #12, #20, #56, #63, #69, and #73) of nine residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 97. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, osteoporosis, major depressive disorder, schizophrenia, shared psychotic disorder, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, alcohol dependence with alcohol-induced persisting dementia, dementia without behavioral disturbance, and phobic anxiety disorders. The resident resided on the secure unit for female residents with dementia, Unit 200. Review of Resident #12's current physician's orders revealed an order for the resident to reside on the secured unit, and to have hospice services effective 02/20/19 for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, review of water temperature monitoring log, review of plumber service report and review of facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to maintain water temperatures in resident areas at a safe and comfortable level. This had the potential to affect 11 independently mobile residents on Unit 200 (#26, #36, #42, #45, #54, #53, #55, #56, #64, #70 and #80), the secured unit for female residents with dementia, as well as six independently mobile residents located (#24, #25, #68, #90, #93, and #100) in the unsecured section of the 200 Unit (rooms number 200 included in the 300 B Unit). The facility census was 97. Findings include: On 02/25/20 at 11:36 A.M. the hot water at the hand sink in Resident #73's bathroom was taken and noted to be 130 degrees Fahrenheit (F). On 02/25/20 at 11:38 A.M. the hot water at the hand sink in Resident #69's bathroom was taken and noted to be 135 F. On 02/25/20 at 11:45 A.M. Maintenance Director (MD) #26 was asked to report to the secured…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. On 02/24/20 at approximately 12:15 P.M., Resident #37 was observed walking up and down the locked 300 hall men's dementia unit. He was observed spitting out thick secretions from his mouth on his hands, lower arms, and on to the floor. Some of the secretions looked like undigested pureed food. His hands were observed by two surveyors to be glistening with sputum. The male housekeeper was off the unit at the time as he was on his lunch break. The sputum was on the floor for approximately 15 minutes until Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #48 brought some towels and washcloths from the other adjacent unit. When asked what she was doing with the linens, she stated it was to clean up the sputum. She was not using any disinfectant to clean up the sputum/secretions. On 02/27/20 at 2:40 PM on 02/27/20, Housekeeping Director #10 was interviewed and stated unless the nurse informed the housekeeper about the sputum they cleaned up, he would not mop and disinfect the area. He was at lunch/break and did not know this had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-27 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and review of maintenance request logs, the facility failed to provide a functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public. This had the potential to affect all 24 Residents (#9, #12, #14, #22, #26, #30, #34, #36, #42, #45, #49, #52, #53, #54, #55, #56, #63, #64, #67, #69, #70, #73, #88, and #91) who resided on Unit 200, as well as one Resident (#13) on Unit 100. The facility census was 97. Findings include: 1. On 02/27/20 at 10:35 A.M. a tour of the secured unit for female residents with dementia, Unit 200, was conducted with Maintenance Director (MD) #26. While touring the unit the following was observed: a) In the large unit dining/activity room there were two long dining tables of which the laminate on the top was heavily worn through. There were multiple scrapes and scuffs on the walls, and one area to the left of the mounted television where a large area of paint and the outer surface of the dry wall was missing. b) In the small…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-02-27 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were enabled and encouraged to make choices on what they preferred to eat at mealtimes. This affected one (Resident #5) of five reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 97 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #5's medical record, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including alcohol dependence with alcohol induced dementia, dysphagia, severe protein calorie malnutrition, abnormal weight loss, schizoaffective disorder, extrapyramidal and movement disorder, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, constipation, arthritis, Vitamin D deficiency, nuclear cataract, cerebral atheroslerosis, general anxiety disorder, hypertension, major depressive disorder, delusions, cerebral ataxia, neuropathy, hearing loss, and ventral hernia. The resident was on a pureed diet with pudding thick liquids. He received a frozen supplement at each meal (magic cup) and 90 cubic centimeters (cc) of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) letter 48 hours prior to being discharged from Medicare Part A Services. This affected one (Resident #202) of three sampled residents. The facility census was 97 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #202's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including anemia, hypertension, renal failure, and hyperkalemia. Further review of SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review, revealed the resident began Medicare Part A services on 10/02/19, and the resident's last covered day (LCD) for therapy services was on 10/11/19. The resident was provided notice his Part A benefits were ended on 10/11/19, the same day, which gave him no time for an appeal. On 02/27/20 at 10:00 A.M., Social Services Director #131, confirmed the resident was not given the required 48 hours notice prior to being cut from skilled therapy services.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to implement each residents plan of care related to activity needs and preference. This affected three residents (#12, #69 and #73) of nine residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 97. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, osteoporosis, major depressive disorder, schizophrenia, shared psychotic disorder, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, alcohol dependence with alcohol-induced persisting dementia, dementia without behavioral disturbance, and phobic anxiety disorders. The resident resided on the secure unit for female residents with dementia, (Unit 200). Review of Resident #12's current physician's orders revealed an order for the resident to reside on the secured unit, and to have hospice services effective 02/20/19 for Parkinson's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-02-27 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interviews the facility failed to develop and implement a discharge plan for residents. This affected two (#95, #103) of three residents review for discharge planning. The facility census was 97. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #95's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/12/18 with diagnoses of Huntington' disease, osteoarthritis, peripheral vascular disease, paranoid schizophrenia, and mood disorder. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition and required extensive assist of two for bed mobility, transfer and toileting, extensive assist of one for dressing, ambulation, personal hygiene, and eating. The MDS indicated no evidence of depression, but presence of delusions and rejections of care four to six days a week. Review of a care plan dated 09/16/18 indicated resident would stay at the facility long term. Review of progress notes dated 01/07/20 indicated a referral was sent to another…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview and review of facility policy the facility failed to attempt gradual dose reductions (GDR) for residents receiving psychotropic medications. This affected two (#39 and #95) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility also failed to ensure a resident was receiving the correct dose of a psychotropic medication. This affected one (Resident #69) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility identified 78 residents as receiving psychotropic medications. The census was 97 Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #39 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of diabetes, hypertension, hypothyroidism, anxiety, bipolar disorder, psychosis, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident had intact cognition and required supervision for completion of activities of daily living. The MDS indicated no evidence of depression, but presence of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and review of facility policy the facility failed to discard expired medications and Control Solution (glucometer testing solution). This directly affected one (Resident #94) and had the potential to affect all residents of the facility. The census was 97. Findings include: Observation of the 300-hall medication cart on 02/26/20 at 11:40 A.M. revealed a brown bag labeled for Resident #94 containing 15 one milliliter (ml) vials of naloxone (emergency medication to counter opioid overdose) liquid medication. Eight of the one ml vials had an expiration date of 01/10/19. During the observation a one ml vial of Control Solution with an expiration date of 01/2020. At the time of the observation Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #75 was interviewed and verified the naloxone and Control Solution were expired. She reported the Control Solution was used every nightshift to calibrate the glucometers used to assess resident blood sugars. She denied any other Control Solution was in the medication cart. Interview on 02/26/20 at 11:45 A.M. with Assistant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure documentation of wound treatments was completed in a residents records. This affected one (Resident #12) of one reviewed for pressure ulcer treatments. The facility identified four residents with pressure ulcers. The resident census was 97. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of schizophrenia, hypertension and dementia without behavioral disturbance. The resident had pressure ulcers on her right thigh, right ischium and sacrum. Review of physician orders revealed the right ischium was to be cleansed, Santyl (debrieder) applied and cover the wound with a four by four gauze and an abdominal (ABD) pad every shift for wound care. The right hip ulcer was to be cleansed, patted dry, Santyl applied and covered with a four by four gauze and an ABD pad every shift for wound care. Review of the Treatment Administration Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-12-26 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to post the daily nurse staffing data. This d the potential to affected all 108 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 108. Findings include: Observation of the facility on 12/11/23 at 11:27 A.M. revealed the daily nurse staffing data was not posted. Interview with Administration on 12/11/23 at 11:27 A.M. verified the daily nurse staffing data was not posted.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$100,887 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $100,887 — penalty dated 2023-11-08
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-01-23 for 16 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCWE HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 01/01/2018 |
| BRECHER, LIBBY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 25% | since 01/01/2018 |
| BRECHER, MENDEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 26% | since 01/01/2018 |
| LICHTMAN, CHANA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 17% | since 01/01/2018 |
| LICHTMAN, SARA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 15% | since 01/01/2018 |
| ZIMMERMAN, JACOB | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 15% | since 01/01/2018 |
| S & T BANK | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | — | since 08/01/2017 |
| COMBS, LINDA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 01/01/2018 |
| KING, CRYSTAL | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 01/01/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366220. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.