Hillebrand Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 213 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 44.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 90 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 108 beds and averages 99.9 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.49 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.29 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.57 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, review of facility in-service records, review of a personnel file, review of the safety inspection bus checklist, review of the facility's Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), review of facility policies, review of the emergency medical services (EMS) run report, review of hospital documentation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was safely secured in the wheelchair with an appropriate seat belt during transportation in a facility bus from an activity department outing. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy when one resident (#05) was placed at potential risk for serious life-threating harm and/or injuries when on 05/28/24, Activity Director (AD) #300 abruptly stopped the facility bus, causing Resident #05 to fall forward out of his wheelchair, hitting another resident, and then landing on the floor. During the fall, Resident #05 sustained a degloving/laceration (a traumatic injury that results in the top layers of skin and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-03-26 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was working in the facility for at least eight consecutive hours a day seven days a week. This had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 98 residents.Findings include: Review of the facility staffing schedules revealed on 03/22/26 the census was 96 residents and there was no RN on the schedule for this date. Interview on 03/26/26 at 1:04 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified there was no RN working during the 24 hours on the date of 03/22/26. The DON verified there needed to be an RN working eight hours of each day. Interview on 03/26/26 at 1:30 P.M. with the Administrator verified there was no RN working on 03/22/26 and an RN was required to work eight hours of each day.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents experienced a dignified dining experience. This affected one (Resident #104) of three residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 98 residents. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #104 revealed an admission date of 07/21/23 with diagnoses including essential tremors, epilepsy, Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder and dysphagia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #104 dated 01/02/26 revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment and required assistance with meals. Observations of the afternoon meal in the dining room on 03/23/26 at 12:00 P.M. revealed Resident #104 was seated at a table with other residents. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #329 brought Resident #104's tray to the table and stood over the resident and began feeding the resident large bites. Resident #104 pushed CNA #329's hand away. CNA #329 did not provide the resident with the opportunity to feed herself, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident call lights were accessible to the resident. This affected one (Resident #86) of three residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility census was 98 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #86 revealed an admission date of 07/22/23 with diagnoses including vascular dementia, respiratory failure, and dysphagia. Review of the care plan for Resident #86 dated 12/10/25 revealed the resident was at risk for falls related to deconditioning, and gait and balance problems. Interventions including the following: provide a safe environment, ensure the call light was working, ensure the call light was within reach. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #86 dated 03/04/26 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Observation on 03/23/26 at 12:21 P.M. of Resident #86 revealed the resident was sitting up in a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure advance directives were accurate. This affected two (Residents #1 and #11) of three residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility census was 98 residents. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 10/11/24 with diagnoses including unspecified bacterial pneumonia, acute pulmonary edema, and Parkinsonism unspecified.Review of the physician's orders for Resident #1 revealed an order dated 12/11/25 for the resident to be a full code. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #1 dated 12/16/25 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of a paper form in Resident #1's chart undated revealed the resident's code status was do not resuscitate comfort care-arrest (DNRCC-A). Interview on 03/24/26 at 2:29 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #114 verified the physician's order in the electronic health record was for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), review of staff witness statements, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from verbal/emotional abuse. This affected one (Resident #104) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 98 residents.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #104 revealed an admission date of 07/21/23 with diagnoses including essential tremors, epilepsy, Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder and dysphagia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #104 dated 01/02/26 revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment and required assistance with meals. Review of the facility SRI initiated 03/23/26 and completed 03/27/26 revealed the facility's investigation determined Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #329 had verbally/emotionally abused Resident #104. CNA #329 was terminated from employment as a result of the abuse. Review of the SRI included review of a signed witness statement per CNA…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported to the state agency in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #21) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility also failed to report allegations of abuse to the state agency. This affected one (Resident #10) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 98 residents.Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 02/10/25 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #21 revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Record review of the facility SRI initiated 03/16/26 revealed an allegation of physical abuse in which Resident #21 reported on 03/13/26 that Registered Nurse (RN) #204 allegedly struck her ear with a towel. Interview on 03/25/26 at 4:41 PM with RN # 204…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), review of staff witness statements, observation, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to prevent possible further abuse by not removing staff from the facility during the investigation. This affected three (Residents #104, #21, and #10) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 98 residents.Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #104 revealed an admission date of 07/21/23 with diagnoses including essential tremors, epilepsy, Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder and dysphagia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #104 dated 01/02/26 revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment and required assistance with meals. Review of the facility SRI initiated 03/23/26 and completed 03/27/26 revealed the facility's investigation determined Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #329 had verbally/emotionally abused Resident #104. CNA #329 was terminated from employment as a result of the abuse. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, review of facility fall investigations, resident interview, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure safe resident transfers to prevent falls. This affected one (Resident #4) of three residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow safe swallowing recommendations during mealtime. This affected one (Resident #104) of three residents reviewed for accident hazards. The facility census was 98 residents.Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 06/09/23 with diagnoses including vascular dementia, major depression, and anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #4 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required the assistance of one staff with transfers. Review of the nurse progress note for Resident #4 dated 03/23/26 at 7:23 A.M. revealed the nurse was called to the resident room because the resident had fallen in the bathroom while a staff person was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0810 — isolated
  Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had adaptive utensils at meals as ordered by the physician. This affected one (Resident #104) of 24 residents sampled. The facility census was 98 residents. Findings include: . Review of the medical record for Resident #104 revealed an admission date of 07/21/23 with diagnoses including essential tremors, epilepsy, Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder, and dysphagia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #104 dated 01/02/26 revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment and required assistance with meals. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #104 dated March 2026 revealed the resident received a mechanical soft diet. The orders specified the resident needed partial feeding assistance such as set up, cueing, sips of fluids between one to two bites, divided plate and built-up utensils and no straws. Review of the dietary ticket for Resident #104 dated 03/23/26 for lunch revealed the resident was to receive built-up utensils at meals.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff donned proper personal protective equipment (PPE) when providing gastrostomy tube (g-tube) care to residents with physician's orders for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP.) The affected one (Resident #23) of two facility-identified residents with orders for EBP. The facility census was 98 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 08/18/25 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and gastrostomy status (g-tube) status. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #23 revealed an order dated 9/17/25 for EBP due to presence of a g-tube. Observation of g-tube feeding for Resident #23 on 03/25/26 at 10:23 A.M. per Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #114 revealed the nurse did not don a gown prior to administration. There was a sign outside Resident #23's door indicating gloves and gowns should be worn while providing care. Interview on 03/25/26 at 10:29 A.M. with LPN…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$16,801 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-06-28

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH