No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Liberty Nursing Center Of Colerain INC

8440 Livingston Road, Cincinnati, OH 45247 · For profit - Corporation · 93 certified beds · (513) 245-2100 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (513) 245-2100 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Dec 2022Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (70%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
8407 Lakevalley Dr · (513) 613-3338 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
8451 Colerain Ave · (513) 245-9467 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3386 W Galbraith Rd · (513) 873-9008 · Call to confirm hours
Park
4725 Springdale Rd · (513) 385-7503 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
4695 Blue Rock Rd · (513) 923-3370

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased18.4%5.3%15.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.4%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.0%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury9.2%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened21.6%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.5%25.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.7%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.2%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control34.4%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table3.4%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine64.6%75.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission29.1%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit18.5%12.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.151.731.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.521.801.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

39.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
8.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.44U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.17hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.19hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 75% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF39.1%CMS range 26.9–55.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.7%CMS range 5.5–14.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.171.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.41
RN hours/ resident / day
0.99
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.62
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.02
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.22
RN hoursweekends
70.4%
Total nursing turnover
77.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 93 beds and averages 57.1 residents a day — about 61% occupied, or roughly 36 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.02 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.62 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.65 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.17 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-02-13)
24
at the previous standard inspection (2022-12-06)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

41 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2022-12-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, staff interviews, review of facility policy, and review of guidelines from the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), the facility failed to ensure physician-ordered and/or care planned interventions were implemented for the treatment of pressure ulcers, failed to thoroughly assess a resident's skin and failed to identify a resident's pressure ulcers until they had already reached an advanced stage. This resulted in Actual Harm to Resident #34 who was admitted to the facility without pressure ulcers and developed two avoidable unstageable pressure ulcers to the left foot. This affected one (#34) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 09/25/17 with a diagnoses including cerebral infarction, dementia, and diabetes mellitus (DM). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #34 dated 10/27/22 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of one to two staff with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2022-12-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations, staff interview, review of facility policy, review of guidelines from the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), and review of an online resources regarding pain in dementia residents, the facility failed to provide pain management interventions in accordance with the resident's care plan. This resulted in Actual Harm to Resident #34 who had acute fractures to her right distal tibia/fibula and two unstageable pressure ulcers to her left foot and the resident was not medicated for pain prior to wound care which resulted in the resident exhibiting signs of severe pain. This affected one (#34) of one residents reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 09/25/17 with a diagnoses including cerebral infarction, dementia, and diabetes mellitus (DM.) Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #34 dated 10/27/22 revealed resident was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of one to two staff with activities of daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to monitor and evaluate residents in response to a change in condition. This affected one (Resident #2) of three residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 55 at the time of survey.Review of the medical record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to home with family on 02/27/2026. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD), chronic kidney disease (stage 3), Alzheimer's Disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and unspecified abdominal pain.Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired with a BIMS of 09 out of 15, had no behaviors, and did not reject care.Review of the progress notes for Resident #2 revealed that Resident #2 complained of abdominal pain and chocolate colored emesis on 02/12/2026 at 10:40 A.M. The physician was notified and ordered monitoring and a clear liquid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to administer medications in a safe and timely manner. This affected one (Resident #3) of three residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 55.Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for aftercare following explantation of hip joint prosthesis and discharged to hospital on [DATE]. Diagnoses included infection and inflammatory reaction due to orthopedic prosthetic devices, acute embolism and thrombosis of deep veins, type II diabetes mellitus, and radiculopathy of the lumbosacral region.Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired, was rarely/never understood, had no behaviors, and did not reject care.Review of physician orders for Resident #3 revealed medication orders including:Seroquel Oral Tablet (Quetiapine Fumarate) - Give 12.5 milligrams (mg) via J-tube three times a day for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and review of staff job descriptions, the facility failed to designate a dedicated Registered Nurse (RN) to serve as the full time Director of Nursing (DON.) This had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 67 residents.Findings include: Interview on 08/19/25 at 9:30 A.M. with the Administrator confirmed the Director of Nursing (DON) was on medical leave and had not been working in the facility since 07/22/25. The Administrator confirmed the facility designated Registered Nurse (RN)#300 who was the facility's sole Minimum Data Set (MDS) nurse to also serve as the interim DON. Interview at 08/21/25 at 9:16 A.M. with Social Services Director (SSD) #339 confirmed RN #300 was the facility's full time MDS Nurse who was also responsible for maintaining the care plans for all of the residents in the facility. Interview on 08/21/25 08/21/25 at 12:42 P.M. with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) stated the DON had a medical emergency and had been unable to work since 07/22/5.The ADON verified the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, review of facility communication with outside entities, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure confidentiality of residents' private health information. This affected one (Resident #82) of three residents reviewed for confidentiality. The facility census was 67 residents.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #82 revealed an admission date of 04/29/21 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, type two diabetes mellitus, and congestive heart failure and a discharge date of 05/14/25. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment Resident #82 revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition and required supervision with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of a written facility communication regarding Resident #82 dated 06/12/25 to the Better Business Bureau (BBB) (a private, non-profit organization with no governmental authority) revealed the letter contained Resident #82's name, diagnoses, weights, prescribed medications, and additional confidential information.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to develop individualized comprehensive resident care plans. This affected one (Resident #80) of 11 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 67 residents.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #80 revealed an admission date of 12/16/22 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, diabetes mellitus type two, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and a discharge date of 08/02/25. Review of hospital records for Resident #80 dated 06/06/25 to 06/08/25 revealed an x-ray of the resident's left foot showed a fracture to the resident's left ankle. Orthopedics evaluated Resident #80, splinted the resident's left lower extremity, and scheduled the resident for follow-up with an orthopedist for 06/10/25. Review of physician's orders for Resident #80 dated 06/08/25 to 08/02/25 revealed there were no orders for care of the left foot nor for care of a splint to the left foot.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2025-08-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received appropriate bathing assistance. This affected one (Resident #85) of three residents reviewed for bathing assistance. The facility census was 67 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #85 revealed an admission date of 02/21/25 with diagnoses including an open wound of the abdominal wall with a discharge date of 05/22/25.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #85 dated 03/14/25 revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and required assistance with bathing, toileting, and dressing. Review of the care plan for Resident #85 dated 03/21/25 revealed the resident required assistance by staff with bathing/showers per schedule and as necessary and to provide a sponge bath when a full bath or shower could not be tolerated. Review of shower sheets for Resident #85 from 04/01/25 to 05/22/25 revealed the resident had four recorded baths on the following dates: 04/06/25, 04/12/25, 05/01/25, and 05/22/25. Interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to implement physician orders for fracture and splint care and failed to implement orders for wound care. This affected two Residents (#80, #82) of 11 residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility census was 67 residents.Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #80 revealed an admission date of 12/16/22 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, diabetes mellitus type two, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and a discharge date of 08/02/25 Review of hospital records for Resident #80 dated 06/06/25 to 06/08/25 revealed an x-ray of the resident’s left foot showed a fracture to the resident’s left ankle. Orthopedics evaluated Resident #80, splinted the resident’s left lower extremity, and scheduled the resident for follow-up with an orthopedist for 06/10/25. Review of physician’s orders for Resident #80 dated 06/08/25 to 08/02/25 revealed there were no orders for care of the left foot nor for care of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure falls were investigated in a timely manner. This affected two (Residents #82 and #84) of four residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 67 residents.Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #84 revealed an admission date of 02/28/25 with diagnoses including convulsions, dementia, and bipolar disorder and a discharge date of 06/04/25. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #84 dated 04/20/25 revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the document titled unwitnessed fall for Resident #84 dated 06/01/25 at 10:20 P.M. revealed the resident was found on the floor next to the bed and was unable to give a description of how she fell. The resident was taken to a local hospital for evaluation. Review of the medical record for Resident #84 revealed it did not include a fall investigation for the resident’s fall on 06/01/25. Interview on 08/19/25 at 2:39 P.M. with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to properly label and store food as well as ensure expired products were disposed of. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility except for Residents #12, #18, and #165 that were identified by the facility as having a diet of nothing by mouth. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Observations of the kitchen's walk-in refrigerator on 02/10/25 from 6:33 P.M. to 6:40 P.M., revealed half of a ham in a plastic zip lock bag that was not dated, shredded lettuce wrapped in plastic wrap undated, tomato soup in a storage container undated,, a metal container filled with small plastic cups with lids that contained shredded cheese that were undated, a carton of [NAME] slaw undated, and green bell peppers wrapped in plastic wrap that were undated. There was a gallon of milk with an expiration date of 02/08/25. Interview on 02/10/25 at 6:40 P.M. with Dietary Staff #48, verified the undated items as well as the expired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident records were updated to reflect a change in their advance directives. This affected one Resident (#52) of the eight residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #52 revealed an admission date of 10/29/24. Diagnoses included quadriplegia, cerebral infarction, congestive heart failure (CHF), paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anemia, insomnia, and anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #52 had moderately impaired cognition. Resident #52 was assessed to be dependent on staff for eating, oral hygiene, toileting, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, bed mobility, and transfer. Review of the physician orders in the electronic medical record (EMR) for Resident #52 dated 12/27/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 29 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to routinely monitor the dialysis access site. This affected one Resident (#15) of two residents reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 03/02/23. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease (ESRD), type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, dependent on renal dialysis, chronic pain syndrome, hypertension, anorexia, hyperkalemia, depression, and unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with agitation. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #15 had moderately impaired cognition. Resident #15 was assessed to require supervision for oral hygiene, toileting, personal hygiene, and transfer, substantial/maximal assistance for bathing, and bed mobility, was independent for eating, and dependent on staff for dressing. Review of the plan of care dated 03/03/23, revealed Resident #15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on review of the facility incident report, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff appropriately disposed of an insulin needle after use. This had the potential to affect one (#70) out of three residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the facility incident report dated 05/05/24 revealed while State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #44 was emptying the trash can in Resident #70 bathroom when she was stuck by a hypodermic insulin needle. The investigation noted the facility was unsure who threw the needle away or who the needle was used on prior to being disposed of in Resident #70's bathroom. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 07/08/24 at 2:00 P.M. revealed an investigation ensued and all staff were educated to prevent any further incidents following STNA #44's needle stick on 05/05/24. The DON confirmed Resident #70 does not have orders for insulin or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided with appropriate assistance and supervision during bed mobility which resulted in the resident having an avoidable fall from the bed. This affected one (#23) out of four residents reviewed for accidents. Facility census was 61. Findings Include: Review of Resident #23's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, mood disorder, dementia, unsteady feet, and lack of coordination. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set, (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 had severely impaired cognition and was required total staff assistance for bed mobility, transfers, locomotion, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene. Review of plan of care for Resident #23 dated 08/07/23 revealed the resident required total care. Review of Resident #23 plan of care revealed there was an update on 09/21/23 which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-06 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to utilize the services of a registered nurse (RN) for at least eight hours a day, seven days a week as required. This had the potential to affect all 68 residents residing at the facility. The facility census was 68. Finding include: Review of the of the facility staff schedules and time card punches for the month of November 2022 revealed the facility failed to have an RN scheduled on 11/13/22. Interview on 12/01/22 at 9:25 A.M. with the Administrator confirmed the facility failed to meet the requirement of providing RN nurse coverage for at least eight hours in the facility on 11/13/22. The Administrator confirmed the facility provided zero hours of RN coverage on 11/13/22 which had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Review of the facility policy titled, Departmental Supervision, dated 2001, revealed an RN is scheduled daily for no less than eight hours a day.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-12-06 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interview, dietary spreadsheet review, and recipe review, the facility failed to ensure consistent portion sizes were served to residents and the facility failed to serve foods as planned on dietary spreadsheets. This had the potential to affect 66 of 66 residents residing in the facility who receive their meals from the kitchen, the facility identified two (#21 and #22) residents who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 68. Findings include: 1. Observation and interview on 11/29/22 at 11:57 A.M. revealed Dietary Staff (DS) #290 revealed the dietary staff was placing lettuce and ranch dressing into a food processor. DS #290 stated she was preparing pureed salad for the residents who receive pureed diets instead of regular salads for the lunch meal. Interview on 11/29/22 at 12:35 P.M., Dietary Supervisor #375 stated residents on pureed diets always receive pureed salads when salads are on the menu. Further review of the daily menu spreadsheet revealed residents on a pureed diet would receive pureed green beans for the lunch meal.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff wore hairnets properly while preparing food. This had the potential to all 66 residents who eat their meals from the facility kitchen. The facility identified two residents (#21 and #22) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 68. Findings include: 1. Observation and interview on 11/28/22 at 8:48 A.M. revealed Dietary Staff (DS) #365 in the kitchen food preparation areas preparing the lunch meal. DS #365 was wearing a bouffant cap over her head with long braids hanging out, approximately eight inches beyond the bouffant cap. Interview at the same time, DS #365 stated she put the bouffant cap on that morning when she came to work but didn't put the braids within the cap because they wouldn't fit. 2. Observation on 11/29/22 at 11:48 A.M. revealed DS #295 preparing pureed cake in the food processor. DS #295 was wearing a bouffant cap, however approximately five inches of her bangs across her forehead were not covered by the bouffant cap. Interview on 11/29/22 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) was worn in a COVID positive resident room and ensure contact precautions were in place for potentially positive symptomatic COVID 19 residents'. This had the potential to affect all 68 residents residing in the facility. In addition, the facility failed to ensure staff practiced proper hand hygiene during meal tray pass. This affected 10 residents (#19, #31, #35, #36 #37, #39, #45, #50, #52, and #54) out of 38 residents who resided on the Blue Hall. The facility census was 68. Findings include; 1. Record review for Resident #275 revealed an admission date of 11/17/22. Diagnoses included Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19), pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus type II, acute and chronic respiratory failure, hypoxia, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, insomnia, hyperkalemia, chronic kidney disease, and essential primary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-06 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were bathed and assisted with getting out of bed per their preference. This affected two (#36 and #325) of two residents reviewed for choices. The census was 68. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #325 revealed an admission date of 11/14/22 with a diagnosis of aftercare following joint replacement surgery. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #325 dated 11/21/22 revealed resident was cognitively intact and required physical assistance of one staff with bathing. Resident #325 was coded as negative for rejection of care and under section F resident was coded as very important when interviewed regarding how important it was to choose between a tub bath, shower, bed bath, or sponge bath. Review of the care plan for Resident #325 dated 11/15/22 revealed the resident had an activities of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment. This affected one (#71) of one residents reviewed for the physical environment. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Observation on 11/28/22 at 9:39 A.M. revealed Resident #71 lying in bed. A large area, approximately two feet by one foot, of an unidentified dried tan substance below the tube feeding pole was identified directly next to the bed. Interview on 11/28/22 at 10:08 A.M., State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #200 verified the large area of unidentified dried tan substance on the floor next to Resident #71 and it needed to be cleaned. Interview on 11/30/22 at 9:21 A.M., Resident #71 stated, that floor is still a mess. It has been that way for a good while. I think that cord (from the tube feeding pump) is cemented into it. Observations on 11/29/22 at 8:18 A.M., 11/30/22 at 8:06 A.M. and 12/01/22 at 3:09 P.M., the large area of unidentified tan substance remained on the floor near Resident #71's bed.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of the facility incident log, review of facility self-reported incidents (SRI's), staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to the Ohio Department of Health (ODH). This affected one (#34) of two residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 68. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 09/25/17 with a diagnoses including cerebral infarction, dementia, and diabetes mellitus (DM). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #34 dated 10/27/22 revealed resident was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of one to two staff with activities of daily living (ADL's). Review of nurse progress note for Resident #34 dated 11/15/22 revealed the aide notified the nurse resident had a bruise to the right inner foot. Nurse assessed resident and noted resident's right ankle and foot were swollen. The attending physician was notified and gave an order for an x-ray to the right foot. Review of nurse progress note for Resident #34…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of the facility incident log, review of facility self-reported incidents (SRI's), staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to investigate an injury of unknown source. This affected one (#34) of two residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 68. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 09/25/17 with a diagnosis of cerebral infarction, dementia, and diabetes mellitus (DM.) Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #34 dated 10/27/22 revealed resident was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of one to two staff with activities of daily living (ADL's.) Review of nurse progress note for Resident #34 dated 11/15/22 revealed the aide notified the nurse resident had a bruise to the right inner foot. Nurse assessed resident and noted resident's right ankle and foot were swollen. The attending physician was notified and gave an order for an x-ray to the right foot. Review of nurse progress note for Resident #34 dated 11/15/22 revealed the x-ray to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-06 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide residents with notification of the bed hold policy when the resident was transferred/discharged to the hospital. This affected two (#09 and #61) out of two residents reviewed for bed hold notification. The facility census was 68. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #09 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive coronary pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, hypertensive heart disease, diabetes mellitus two, anemia, acute kidney failure, obesity, essential primary hypertension, osteoarthritis, and insomnia. Review of Resident #09 quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/23/22, revealed she had mildly impaired cognition. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed she required extensive assistance with most activities of daily living including bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. She was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/13/17. admission diagnoses included cerebrovascular disease, morbid obesity, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, depression, and macular degeneration. Review of Resident #2's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 out of 15. Review of the MDS revealed Resident #2 required extensive one-person assistance for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene. The MDS revealed Resident #2 required supervision with set-up help for eating. Further review of section N revealed the resident received insulin, antidepressants, hypnotics, anticoagulants, diuretics and opioid's. Review of Resident #2's plan of care dated 10/25/22 revealed the resident was dependent on staff for emotional, physical, cognitive, well-being. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed the last care conference was 07/15/21. Review of the Care Conference note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, staff interview, physician and nurse practitioner (NP) interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a fracture was examined in a timely manner by a physician or provider. This affected one (34) of two residents reviewed for abuse concerns. The census was 68. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 09/25/17 with a diagnoses including cerebral infarction, dementia, and diabetes mellitus (DM.) Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #34 dated 10/27/22 revealed resident was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of one to two staff with activities of daily living (ADL's.) Review of the care plan for Resident #34 dated 10/22/22 revealed resident was admitted to hospice for a terminal diagnosis of protein calorie malnutrition. Review of nurse progress note for Resident #34 dated 11/15/22 revealed the aide notified the nurse resident had a bruise to the right inner foot. Nurse assessed resident and noted resident's right ankle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide nail care for dependent residents. This affected two (#34 and 36) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. The census was 68. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 09/25/17 with a diagnoses including cerebral infarction, dementia, and diabetes mellitus (DM). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #34 dated 10/27/22 revealed resident was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of one to two staff with activities of daily living (ADL's). Review of the care plan for Resident #34 dated 12/27/21 revealed resident was dependent on staff for most of her ADL's due to left hemiparesis after cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and severely impaired cognition. Interventions included to check nail length and trim and clean on bath day and as necessary, report any changes to the nurse. Review of medical record for Resident #34 revealed resident was last…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed ensure care was provided per the physician's orders. This affected two (#5 and #235) of 18 residents sampled. The census was 68. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 06/17/19 with diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #5 dated 10/21/22 revealed resident was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of one staff with activities of daily living (ADL's.) Review of orthopedic surgeon visit note for Resident #5 dated 10/04/22 revealed the resident had sustained a fracture to her right wrist during a fall. The surgeon immobilized the wrist in a brace because he did not feel resident would tolerate wearing a cast well. Further review of the note revealed the resident should wear the brace at all times and could remove the brace when showering. Review of physician's orders for Resident #5 revealed an order dated 10/13/22 for the resident to wear a brace…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured and stored safely. This had the potential to affect three residents (#45, #53, and #35) who resided on the facility's Blue unit that are cognitively impaired and independently mobile. Additionally, the facility also failed to ensure a resident at risk for elopement did not elope from the facility. This affected one (#61) out of one resident reviewed for elopement. The facility census was 68. Findings include: 1. Observation on 11/30/22 at 8:15 A.M. revealed a large bag of medications from the pharmacy underneath the counter at the Blue unit nurse station. Interview on 11/30/22 at 8:37 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) verified the large bag of medications from the pharmacy was underneath the counter, unlocked. The DON confirmed the medications should be locked inside the medication room. 2. Observation on 11/30/22 at 9:23 A.M., on the Blue unit, revealed a medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-06 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure weights were obtained as ordered and according to the facility policy. Additionally, the facility also failed to ensure tube feeding was labeled and a syringe was replaced timely. This affected two (#71 and #36) of two residents reviewed for tube feeding. The facility census was 68. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #71 revealed an admission date of 10/10/22. Diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, systemic lupus erythematosus, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, oropharyngeal dysphagia, encephalopathy, chronic systolic heart failure, anemia, hypothyroidism, unspecified mood disorder, gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, and personal history of transient ischemic attack and cerebral infarction. Review of the comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition. The resident required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident and staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to administer oxygen in accordance with a physician's order. This affected one (#36) of eight residents reviewed with orders for oxygen. Additionally, the facility also failed to ensure oxygen tubing was dated upon application. This affected three (#20, #29 and #36) of eight residents reviewed with orders for oxygen. The census was 68. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 10/17/22 with a diagnosis of adult hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #36 dated 10/24/22 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance of one staff with activities of daily living (ADL's). Review of the care plan for Resident #36 revealed it did not include documentation of oxygen therapy for the resident. Review of the physician orders for Resident #36 revealed there were no orders for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic drugs by failing to appropriately monitor side effects of psychotropic medications. This affected two (#8 and #11) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 68. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/23/19. admission diagnoses included diabetes, chronic kidney disease, schizophrenia, arthritis, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, fracture of medial malleolus of the left tibia, Alzheimer's disease, heart failure, and peripheral venous insufficiency. Review of Resident #8's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) of 10 out of 15. Review of the MDS revealed the resident required extensive one-person assistance for bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. Resident #8 was independent with set-up for eating. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-06 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as physician ordered resulting in two medication errors out of 34 errors or a 5.8 percent (%) medication error rate. This affected two (#19 and #31) of four residents observed for medication administration. The census was 65. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 12/23/20 with a diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute respiratory failure, and anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #31 dated 12/31/22 revealed resident was cognitively intact and required supervision with activities of daily living (ADL's). Review of the January 2023 monthly physician orders revealed an order dated 06/03/21 for Fosamax 70 milligram (mg) tablet to be given once every seven days for osteoporosis. Observation on 01/12/23 at 9:10 A.M. of medication administration per Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #841 for Resident #31 revealed Fosamax was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to administer intravenous antibiotics as physician orders for the treatment of a urinary tract infection (UTI) resulting in significant medication errors. This affected one (#21) of six residents reviewed for medications administration. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of Resident #21's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/28/18. admission diagnoses included pneumonitis, urinary tract infection, protein-calorie malnutrition, dysphagia following a cerebral infarction, anoxic brain damage, aphasia, dysphagia, and sepsis. Review of Resident #21's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview Mental Status unable to be completed. Review of the MDS revealed the resident required extensive one-person assistance for bed mobility, dressing, and personal hygiene. The resident required total one-person assistance for eating and toileting. Review of Resident #21's plan of care dated 11/10/22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly secured, properly discarded and/or properly labeled. This affected three (#225, #9 and one one unknown resident) residents whose medication were left either unsecured, not properly labeled and not properly discarded. The facility census was 68. Findings include: 1. Review of discharged Resident #225 revealed an admission date of 02/07/20. admission diagnoses included acute posthemorrhagic anemia, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, protein calorie malnutrition, dementia, and psychotic disorder. Further review revealed the resident expired in the facility on 11/11/22. Review of Resident #225's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated revealed the resident required extensive two-person assistance for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and toileting. The resident required extensive one-person assistance for personal hygiene. The resident required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interview, dietary spreadsheet review, recipe review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure recipes were followed when preparing pureed foods and also failed to ensure proper consistency of pureed foods in an effort to ensure pureed food items were palatable. This had the potential to affect three (#12, #33, and #71) of 68 residents who received a pureed diet. The facility census was 68. Findings include: 1. Observation and interview on 11/29/22 at 11:57 A.M. revealed Dietary Staff (DS) #290 place lettuce and ranch dressing into a food processor. DS #290 stated she was preparing pureed salad for the three (#12, #33, and #71) residents on pureed diets. When queried, DS #290 stated she did not measure the lettuce before placing it in the food processor and, instead, just used what was left after preparing bowls of salad for residents on regular diets. DS #290 was unable to say how much ranch dressing was added to the food processor. DS #290 pulsed the lettuce and ranch dressing and poured the contents into three bowls. The contents were observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-28 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) Submission Report review, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to submit the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment within the 14 days after completion of assessments. This affected two Residents (#1 and #2) out of two reviewed for resident assessment. The facility census was 71. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 07/13/18, with diagnoses including methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (mrsa) infection, sepsis, cellulitis, urinary tract infection, metabolic encephalopathy, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, diabetes, morbid obesity, depression, restless legs syndrome, obstructive sleep apnea, hypertension, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, osteoarthritis, chronic gout, acute kidney failure, altered mental status, and enterocolitis. Review of the Annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-28 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were accurate on the minimum data set (MDS) assessment. This affected one (#34) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission date of 07/06/18. Diagnosis included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, and dementia. Review of annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #34 received a diuretic medication for seven days and an antibiotic for three days during the seven day assessment reference dates, 08/10/19 through 08/16/19. Review of Resident #34's medication administration record (MAR) for August 2019 revealed Resident #34 received furosemide, a diuretic medication, 40 milligrams (mg) by mouth daily 08/10/19 through 08/15/19 for a total of six days and did not receive any antibiotic medication 08/10/19 through 08/16/19. Interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to reconcile narcotics at the time of administration. This affected one (#42) of six residents observed during medication administration. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Observation on 08/27/19 at 4:46 P.M., with Registered Nurse (RN) #15 of the Blue Hall Medication Cart #1 revealed on Resident #42's tramadol 50 milligrams (mg) narcotic sheet showed total of 22 pills. However, when the sheet was matched to the sleeve of pills there were only 21 tramadol 50 mg actually present. Interview on 08/27/19 during observation with RN #15 verified she had given the tramadol around approximately 2:00 P.M. and forgot to sign it out, at the time she administrated it. Review of the policy titled Controlled Drug Reconciliation Policy dated 11/2017, revealed controlled medications are stored under double lock, and counted at each change of shift by two nurses who sign the change of shift log verifying the count was correct and transferring responsibility. Removal of a controlled medication is recorded on a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to have a stop date for the use of as needed (prn) psychotropic medication. This affected one (#62) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility identified 45 residents currently receiving psychotropic medications. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #62 revealed an admission date of 08/10/16, with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, vitamin D deficiency, urinary tract infection, benign prostatic hyperplasia, cardiac defibrillator, low back pain, angina, hypercholesterolemia, ischemic optic neuropathy, heart failure, lung disorders, shortness of breath, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, spinal stenosis, pneumonia, metabolic encephalopathy, respiratory failure, idiopathic hypotension, diabetes, heart failure, chronic pain, depression, mood disorder, and dementia with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-12-06 · tag F0888 — widespread
    Ensure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the unprecedented global pandemic that resulted in the Presidential declaration of a State of National Emergency dated 03/13/20, review of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) memorandum QSO-23-02-ALL, review of the staff COVID-19 vaccination list, review of the staffing schedules, review of the facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure their employee COVID-19 vaccination rate was 100%. This had the potential to affect all 68 residents who resided in the facility. The census was 68. Findings include: Review of the undated facility staff COVID-19 vaccination list revealed the facility had a total of 89 employees. There were 63 employees fully vaccinated for COVID-19 and 24 employees who had been granted a medical or religious exemption. However, there were two employees dietary aide (DA) #295, and state tested nurse aide (STNA) #210 who had received only one dose of the COVID-19 vaccination on 02/14/22. The facility staff COVID-19 vaccination status rate was 97.8%. Review of the facility staffing schedules documented DA #295 worked in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LIBERTY NURSING CENTERS HOLDING COMPANY INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/03/2010
BLACK-KUREK, LINDAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER100%since 11/03/2010
JOHNSON, DUNISHAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 12/07/2020
CARPENTER, BRUCEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/03/2010

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-13.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 81%Medicare 7%Other / private 13%

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$410per resident / day
operating cost
$12,476per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$362per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366427. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next