No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Mount Washington Care Center

6900 Beechmont Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45230 · For profit - Corporation · 129 certified beds · (513) 231-4561 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (513) 231-4561 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
7300 Beechmont Ave · (513) 232-9100 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.6 mi
7135 Beechmont Ave · (513) 231-8714 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1348 Beacon St · (513) 231-8220 · Call to confirm hours
Park
6910 Salem Rd · (513) 624-0517 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.9%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.2%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms30.0%30.1%6.5%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.2%3.2%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.5%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.8%25.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.8%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.0%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.4%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table2.2%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine52.6%75.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.4%24.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.0%12.9%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.171.731.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.411.801.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 25 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

57.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.25U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 33% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF57.9%CMS range 42.2–70.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.3%CMS range 5.8–13.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay4.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.991.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.58
RN hours/ resident / day
1.17
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.08
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.82
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.38
RN hoursweekends
52.2%
Total nursing turnover
53.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 129 beds and averages 73.9 residents a day — about 57% occupied, or roughly 55 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.82 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.46 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.97 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-04)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2022-02-04)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-03-04 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of a fall investigation, review of hospital records, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to effectively manage one Resident's (#56) pain following an unwitnessed fall on 08/15/24, which subsequently resulted in a left subcapital femoral neck fracture. Actual harm occurred on 08/15/24 around 11:15 P.M. when Resident #56 had an unwitnessed fall in her room and reported left leg and knee pain to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #212 and LPN #213. Resident #56 received one as needed (PRN) Tylenol but no documentation was completed on the medication administration record (MAR). The resident verbally yelled out and had facial grimacing and refused to get out of bed related to continued pain and discomfort in her left leg. The On-call Nurse Practitioner (NP) #214 ordered Resident 56 to receive a left knee x-ray and an ice pack for pain. Resident #56 did not receive any additional pain medications or non-pharmacological pain interventions until the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff, resident and family interview, the facility failed to ensure call lights were answered timely. This affected three (#02, #04, and #06) of five residents reviewed for care. The facility census was 69.Findings Include:1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #02 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease (stage four), esophageal obstruction, and hypertensive heart disease.Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #02 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, had not rejected care, and did not wander.During an interview and observation on 01/07/26 at 11:10 A.M., Resident #02 was cold and pushed his call light for assistance. The call light was observed activated at 11:12 A.M. and was not answered until 11:39 A.M. resulting in a 27 minute delay.Interview on 01/07/26 at 11:40 A.M., the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #106 said call lights should ideally be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure implementation of physician orders for appropriate respiratory care. This affected one (Resident #71) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care and services. The facility census was 70 residents. Findings include:Review of medical record revealed for Resident #71 revealed an admission date of 07/26/25 with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure, tracheostomy, pneumonia, intracerebral hemorrhage, and functional quadriplegia. Review of the baseline care plan for Resident #71 dated 07/26/25 revealed resident was severely cognitively impaired, was dependent for all care, had a feeding tube for nutrition, and was a full code. Review of a progress note for Resident #71 dated 07/26/25 revealed the note did not include documentation of physician's orders for tracheostomy care or oxygen administration. Review of the admitting physician's orders for Resident #71 dated 07/26/25 revealed they did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure care conferences were held as required for residents and their representatives. This affected seven Residents (#02, #10, #17, #35, #36, #42 and #56) of the seven residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 80. Findings include: 1) Review of the medical record revealed Resident #02 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included osteoarthritis of right knee, diabetes mellitus, Stage IV pressure ulcer (sacrum). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #02 had no cognitive impairment. Review of a Care Conference Meeting Summary documents with the Administrator, revealed Resident #02 did not have documented care conferences in the first quarter (January, February and March) and third quarter (July, August and September) of 2024. The only care conference meetings that were documented for 2024 were held on 05/09/24 and 12/12/24.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to utilize the correct transfer lifting sling for the mechanical lift, as listed in the manufacture directions. This affected one Resident (#22) but had the potential to affect 13 additional Residents (#17, #10, #15, #1, #66, #76, #233, #25, #40, #58, #23, #231 and #63) who the facility identified as being dependent on staff for transfer via mechanical lift. The facility also failed to properly assess/evaluate residents for safe smoking practices. This affected two Residents (#10 and #33) of the two residents identified as being smokers. The facility census was 80. Findings Include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #22 include multiple sclerosis, left above knee amputation, muscle weakness, peripheral vascular disease, gout, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. Review of a physician order dated 12/19/23 for Resident #22, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary kitchen to prevent cross contamination of food. This affected 78 Residents who received food from the kitchen. The faciity identified two residents who did not receive any food from the kitchen. The facility total census was 80. Findings Include: Observation on 02/24/25 at 8:50 A.M., revealed there was a gray material blowing off of the grill of the wall fan blowing towards a table where foods were being prepared by [NAME] #180. In the dry food storage area, there were three bags of open, undated and unlabeled foods. There was an outputting air vent, three feet from foods being cooked on the stove, with a heavy buildup of grayish debris. Above the stove, the exhaust vents were noted with gray debris hanging over foods cooking on the stove. There were approximately 30 large unopened food cans in a storage rack with no date of delivery. In the walk-in refrigerator, there was an opened cottage cheese container with an expiration date of 02/17/25. Interview on 02/24/25 at 8:55 A.M., the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to serve meals to all residents in the dining room in a timely manner. This affected two Residents (#65 and #71) of the three residents dependent on staff in the 200-unit dining room. The facility census was 80. Findings Include: 1) Review of medical record for Resident #65, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #65 include dementia, cerebral infarction, hemiplegia, dysphagia, anxiety disorder, restlessness and agitation. Review of the Minimum Data Set, (MDS) comprehensive assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for meal assistance. The resident received a regular puree diet. 2) Review of the medical record for Resident #71 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident # 71 include hemiplegia, dysphagia, restlessness and agitation. Review of the MDS comprehensive assessment dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-04 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman when residents were transferred or discharged from the facility. This affected two Residents (#42 and #58) of the two residents reviewed for Ombudsman notification. The facility total census was 80. Findings Include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 08/18/21. Diagnoses included pneumonia, type two diabetes mellitus (DM II), acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and major depressive disorder. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #42 had moderate cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine. This resident was assessed to require setup with eating, partial assistance with toileting and transfers, and supervision with bathing and dressing. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #42 was sent to the hospital and admitted on the following dates: 08/10/24, 08/24/24, and 09/16/24 with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who were at risk for skin breakdown, had interventions implemented to prevent skin breakdown. This affected one Resident (#23) of the three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Record review of Resident #23 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #23 include hemiplegia, aphasia, dementia, dysphagia, and malnutrition. Review of a physician order for Resident #23 dated 12/04/24, revealed the resident was ordered to wear heel lift boots to bilateral extremities when in bed for prevention of skin breakdown. Review of the Minimum Data Set, (MDS) comprehensive assessment for Resident #23 dated 12/31/24, revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADS). Review of a therapy note for Resident #23 dated 12/31/24, revealed the resident should have a pillow…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-04 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interviews, review of hospital records, and policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate hydration for a dependent resident. This affected one Resident (#17) of the residents reviewed for hydration. The facility also failed to adequately monitor residents weight loss/gain, notify the physician and implement interventions. This affected two Residents (#10 and #73) of the four residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 80. Findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 06/18/16. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, type two diabetes mellitus, paranoid schizophrenia, and major depressive disorder. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #17 was unable to complete a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) because he was rarely/never understood. Resident #17 was dependent on staff with eating, toileting, bathing, dressing, and transfers. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observatoin, medical record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure insulin vials were properly labeled and stored. This affected four Residents (#09, #30, #41 and #49) of the 17 residents with medications stored in the two-center medication cart. The facility census was 80. Findings include: 1) Review of the medical record revealed Resident #09 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses of diabetes mellitus type 1 with diabetic polyneuropathy, hypertension, chronic kidney disease state III and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) annual assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #09 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for medications. Review of a physician order for Resident #09 dated 04/05/25 revealed the resident was ordered to receive Novolog (Aspart fast acting insulin) 100 Unit/milliliter (mL) dated 04/05/24 per sliding scale according to the resident's blood sugar readings.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-04 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely dental care services. This affected one Resident (#58) of one resident reviewed for dental services. The facility total census was 80. Findings Include: Record review of Resident #58 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hemiplegia, cerebral infarction, dysphagia, chronic obstruction pulmonary disease, diabetes, and malnutrition. Review of a physician order dated 09/01/23, revealed the resident may see dental services as needed. Review of a care conference dated 12/04/24, revealed Resident #58 requested a dental appointment to have dentures repaired. There was no documented evidence that the resident had a dental appointment since admission of 09/01/23. Review of Dental Service Contract dated 12/16/24, revealed Resident #58's Power of Attorney, (POA) signed an authorization for the resident to have dental services. Review of the Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, observations, staff interviews, review of online resources from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), and policy review, the facility failed to provide appropriate infection control measures while performing incontinence care and failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBPs) were implemented and followed according to guidelines. This affected one Resident (#17) of the 17 residents reviewed for incontinence care and being on EBPs. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 06/18/16. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, type two diabetes mellitus, paranoid schizophrenia, and major depressive disorder. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #17 was unable to complete a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) because he was rarely/never understood. This resident was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview with the physician, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to timely notify the physician when Resident #78 had abnormal vital signs during the time Resident #78 was exhibiting a change in condition and being treated for an infection. This affected one (Resident #78) of three residents reviewed for change in condition. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #78 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cholecystitis, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, vascular dementia, and urine retention. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #78 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of the plan of care dated 11/21/23 revealed Resident #78 was at risk for activity of daily living and self-care performance deficit related to intolerance, dementia, and fatigue. Interventions included to obtain and record all vital signs per orders and as needed, and report changes from usual to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to investigate resident falls and determine the root cause of the resident's falls. This affected three (#25, #82, and #86) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 82. Findings include: 1. Review of the closed medical record revealed Resident #86 had an admission date on [DATE]. Resident #86 discharged from the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hypertension and systolic congestive heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #86 was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of the plan of care dated [DATE] revealed Resident #86 was at risk for falls related to confusion, gait and balance problems, hypotension, poor communication, and comprehension and unawareness of safety needs. Interventions included non-skid socks as tolerated and ensure the resident was wearing appropriate non-skids in bed. Review of the fall risk tool dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, observation, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care for a resident. This affected one (Resident #80) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Review of Resident #80's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/10/21. Diagnoses included dementia severity, anxiety disorder, and atherosclerotic heart disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #80 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #80 required substantial maximum assistance from staff for toileting. Review of the plan of care dated 12/01/23 revealed Resident #80 was at risk for incontinence and wearing disposable briefs, required and received assistance with toileting and incontinence care, and was at increased risk for skin breakdown and urinary tract infections. Interventions included to monitor and document signs and symptoms of urinary tract infection and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-16 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to coordinate care with the home health agency to ensure a smooth and safe resident discharge. This affected one (#90) of three residents reviewed for discharge planning. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #90 revealed an admission date of 09/21/23, with diagnoses including chronic osteomyelitis, atherosclerotic heart disease, presence of cardiac pacemaker, atrial fibrillation, epilepsy, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #90 dated 10/06/23 revealed resident was discharged to home with a return not anticipated. Review of MDS revealed resident was cognitively intact and required supervision and touching assistance with activities of daily living. Review of the discharge paperwork for Resident #90 with home health services revealed the resident was discharged with an order dated 09/21/2, for Vancomycin once daily via intravenous (IV) for 36 days and an order for a Vancomycin level to be drawn every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-02-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure refrigerator temperatures were checked routinely, specifically refrigerators holding medications. Additionally, failed to ensure residents' refrigerated foods were properly labeled. This affected all 84 residents who reside in the facility. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Observation on 01/27/22 at 9:24 A.M., revealed medicine storage room refrigerator on first floor had no monthly temperature log. Two thermometers were in the refrigerator with prescribed medications. The temperature in the refrigerator was appropriate at this time, but no monthly temperature log was present. Interview on 01/27/22 at 9:35 P.M., revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #85 reported she was not sure who was responsible for keeping medicine refrigerator temperatures and had no knowledge of monthly temperature log sheet. LPN #85 verified there was no monthly temperature log to document daily temperatures. Observation on 01/27/22 at 10:34…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff, resident and family interview, observations, review of the staffing schedules for room assignments and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents received care and services according to the plan of care. This affected five residents (#09, #16, #37, #43 and #48) of six reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 09/01/2019. Diagnoses included stroke with hemiplegia and hemiparesis, contractures, communication deficit, hypertension, and convulsions. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #37 revealed impaired cognition. Resident #37 required extensive assistance for bed mobility and toilet use from one staff member, total assistance for transfers and supervision for eating. Resident #37 was assessed as always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Resident was last treated by physical therapy on 08/21/19.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff and resident interview and policy review. The facility failed to ensure medications were safely stored. This affected five residents (#08, #56, #58, #70 and #382) out of five residents reviewed. The facility census was 84. 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #70 he admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnosis included essential primary hypertension, hyperlipidemia, anemia, arthritis, pressure ulcer of the left heel, and COVID-19. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #70 dated 12/23/21 revealed he had intact cognition. Resident #70 was independent with eating and did not require any assistance from staff. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated January 2022 revealed Resident #70 was ordered the following morning medications: ferrous sulfate (iron supplement) 365 mg , folic acid (a supplement) tablet one mg, lactobacillus (probiotic) capsule, senna (a medication for constipation) two tablets, thiamine (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview and resident interview, observation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents had appropriate clothing to wear. This affected one resident (#434) of three residents (#09, #78, and #434) reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #434 revealed an admission date of 01/14/22. Diagnoses included displaced comminuted fracture of shaft of right femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, unspecified fracture of right lower leg, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, morbid obesity due to excess calories, obstructive sleep apnea and hypertension. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/21/22 revealed Resident #434 had intact cognition. The resident required limited assistance for bed mobility, total dependence for transfer, extensive assistance for dressing, personal hygiene, and toilet use and supervision for eating.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-04 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure resident advance directives were accurate. This affected one resident (#02) of three residents (#02, #09 and #49) reviewed for advance directives. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #02 revealed an admission date of 02/19/21. Diagnoses included pulmonary embolism, cognitive communication deficit, other cerebral infarction due to occlusion or stenosis of small artery, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertensive encephalopathy, atrial fibrillation, and insomnia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #02 had moderate impaired cognition. The resident required extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene and supervision for eating. Review of the electronic health record revealed the resident had an order for a Full Code status dated 02/19/21. Review of the paper chart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff and family interview, and policy review the facility failed to maintain resident room environment in a clean, sanitary and comfortable manner. This affected three residents (#07, #25 and #48) of eight residents who resided in the seven rooms observed. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Observation on 01/24/22 at 11:36 A.M., revealed Resident #25's floors was covered with debris, loose straw wrappings, dead flower leaves and wipes. Interview on 01/24/22 at 11:45 A.M., revealed Resident #25 reported she has not had her room cleaned in a few days. Observation on 01/24/22 at 11:56 A.M., revealed Resident #07's floors were stained, and paper was on the floor. Resident #07 was unable to answer interview questions. Observation on 01/24/22 at 12:00 P.M., revealed Resident #48's floors were dirty with debris and the bedside table was stained. Interview on 01/24/22 at 12:02 P.M., revealed Resident #48's family member reported staff mopped over the dirty floors and they do not clean the bed side tables. Interview on 01/24/22 at 12:28 P.M., revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-04 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure a valid Pre-admission Screen and Resident Review (PASRR) was in place. This affected one resident (#382) out of three residents (#68, #70, and #382 residents reviewed for PASRR status. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #382 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included cerebral infarction, anemia, pulmonary edema, acute embolism, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, major depressive disorder, COVID-19, essential primary hypertension, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) 5-day assessment, dated 12/20/21, revealed Resident #382 required limited assistance from staff with bed mobility, transfers, dressing and extensive assistance from staff with e. Resident #382 was independent with eating. Review of the medical record revealed no evidence a new PASRR was submitted for approval to the State agency following the expiration of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-04 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for residents. This affected two residents (#68 and #382) of three residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for resident #68 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, non-displaced fracture of medial malleolus of right tibia, Covid 2019 (Covid 19), gastro-esophageal reflux disease, major depressive disorder, essential primary hypertension, hypothyroidism, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment for Resident #68 dated 12/28/21 revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition. Resident #68 required limited assistance from staff for bed mobility, however, he required extensive assistance from staff with toilet use, personal hygiene. Resident #68 required supervision from staff with eating and he was totally dependent on staff with bathing. Further review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interview and observations the facility failed to ensure residents received specialized range of motion appliances as ordered by the physician. This affected two residents (#43 and #37) of two residents reviewed for splints and palm protector placement. The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #37 revealed an admission on [DATE]. Diagnoses included stroke with hemiplegia and hemiparesis, contractures, communication deficit, hypertension, and convulsions. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #37 revealed impaired cognition. Resident #37 required extensive assistance for bed mobility and toilet use from one staff member, total assistance for transfers and supervision for eating. Resident #37 had functional limitations in range of motion on one side. Resident #37 was last treated by physical therapy on 08/21/19. Review of the plan of care for Resident #37 revealed resident had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-04 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interview, observation and review of the incident report the facility failed to ensure an intravenous (IV) catheter was initiated on the correct resident. This affected one resident (#50) of two residents reviewed for intravenous fluid. The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #50 revealed an admission date on 12/19/19. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a stroke, type two diabetes, high blood pressure, depression, and convulsions. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #50 revealed intact cognition. Resident #50 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, toilet use and transfers occurred once or twice during the assessment period. Review of the plan of care for Resident #50 had no plan related for IV fluid administration. Review of the active physician's orders for the month of January 2022 had no orders for any IV fluid administration.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-04 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and observations the facility failed to monitor for adverse side effects for residents receiving psychotropic medications. This affected one resident (#57) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. The facility census is 84. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #57 revealed an admission date on 01/01/20. Diagnoses included type two diabetes, metabolic encephalopathy, stage three kidney disease, dry eye syndrome, anxiety disorder, polyarthritis, depression, hypothyroidism, osteoporosis, history of mental and behavioral disorders. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #57 revealed intact cognition. Resident #57 required extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfers, eating and toilet use. Resident #57 received antianxiety medication (two days out of seven days during the assessment period) and antipsychotic medications daily during the assessment period. Review of the plan of care for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-04 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and observations the facility failed to ensure residents receiving as needed psychotropic medications was limited to 14 days and not continued unless the prescribing physician evaluated the appropriateness of the medication. This affected one resident (#57) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. The facility census is 84. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #57 revealed an admission date on 01/01/20. Diagnoses included type two diabetes, metabolic encephalopathy, stage three kidney disease, dry eye syndrome, anxiety disorder, polyarthritis, depression, hypothyroidism, osteoporosis, history of mental and behavioral disorders. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #57 revealed an intact cognition. Resident #57 required extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfers, eating and toilet use. Resident #57 received antianxiety medications during the assessment period. Review of the plan of care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-04 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, observations, and policy review the facility failed to ensure staff was available to assist dependent residents with eating after meals trays were delivered to resident rooms. This affected one resident (#36) of four reviewed for dependent residents requiring meal assistance. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #36 revealed an admission on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, anxiety, hypertension, allergic rhinitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, pulmonary fibrosis, stroke, malignant neoplasm of brain, major depressive disorder, malignant neoplasm of lungs, carcinoma of male genital organs and dementia with behavioral disturbances. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #36 had impaired cognition. Resident #36 required extensive assistance from two staff members for bed mobility. Resident #36 required extensive assistance for eating from one staff member.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-04 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure a resident food preferences were accommodated. This affected one resident (#15) of three residents reviewed for meal preferences. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/17/21. Diagnoses included hypertensive heart disease without heart failure, insomnia, hypertension, anxiety, hearing loss, major depressive disorder, disorder of bone density and structure, hypothyroidism, atrial fibrillation and nonexudative age-related macular degeneration and bilateral, early dry stage. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 had intact cognition. No rejection of care and the resident required supervision for eating. Observation on 01/24/22 at 12:22 P.M., revealed Resident #15's lunch meal was served and included a grilled cheese sandwich, tomato soup, potato chips, pickle chips, fruit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-04 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview the facility failed to provide each resident with a therapeutic diet as ordered by their physician. This affected one resident (#54) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: Review of Resident #54's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included major depressive disorder, muscle weakness, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, type two diabetes mellitus without complications, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis. Review of the quarterly minimum data set assessment (MDS) of the resident dated 12/16/21 revealed Resident #54 had severe cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility and transfer and required supervision for eating. No rejection of care noted. Review of the physician's orders revealed Resident #54 had an order for a Health Nutritional Shake (HNS) daily at lunch due to weight loss. Review of the resident's current…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure when a resident formulated an advanced directive, the information regarding the advanced directive was accurate in all areas where advanced directive information was included in the medical record. This affected one (#107) out of 24 residents reviewed for Advanced Directives. The facility census was 123. Findings include: Review of Resident #107's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in August of 2012 with current diagnoses including pneumonia, sepsis, peptic ulcer perforation, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus type 2, acute gastritis with bleeding, major depressive disorder, and personality disorder. The facility completed an annual minimum data set assessment (MDS) of Resident #107's cognitive status on 04/04/19. The 04/04/19 assessment identified the resident as having good memory and recall, and good cognitive skills for daily decision making. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to implement one resident's plan of care to prevent potential elopement from the facility. This affected one (#20) out of two resident reviewed for Accidents. The facility census was 123. Findings include: Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in September of 2016 with current diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance, repeated falls, difficulty in walking, major depressive disorder, and degenerative diseases of the nervous system. The facility completed a quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment of the resident's cognitive and physical functional status dated 03/04/19. The 03/04/19 assessment identified the resident as having moderately impaired cognitive skills, behavioral symptoms not directed towards others, required limited assistance to transfer, and was able to self-propel her wheel chair with supervision and oversight. Resident #20 was observed propelling herself about in her room, and on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to implement one resident's plan of care to prevent potential elopement from the facility. This affected one (#20) out of two resident reviewed for Accidents. The facility census was 123. Findings include: Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in September of 2016 with current diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance, repeated falls, difficulty in walking, major depressive disorder, and degenerative diseases of the nervous system. The facility completed a quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment of the resident's cognitive and physical functional status dated 03/04/19. The 03/04/19 assessment identified the resident as having moderately impaired cognitive skills, behavioral symptoms not directed towards others, required limited assistance to transfer, and was able to self-propel her wheel chair with supervision and oversight. Resident #20 was observed propelling herself about in her room, and on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-01-05 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespread
    Hire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to have a full time qualified social worker for a facility with more than 120 beds. This had the potential to affect all 82 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's demographics revealed the facility was certified for 129 beds. Review of the former social worker's employee file revealed the Director of Social Services #575 last day worked was 11/21/23. Interview on 01/02/24 at 10:56 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified the facility did not have a full time qualified social worker. The DON stated the current Administrator was off on personal leave and unable to be reached. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00149067.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-10-16 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse was working at least 8 hours a day. This had the potential to affect all 89 residents. The census was 89. Findings: Review of the staff schedule for 10/08/23 through 10/14/23 revealed on Saturday 10/14/23 there was not a Registered Nurse (RN) working for at least 8 hours on this date. Interview on 10/16/23 at 3:06 P.M. with the Director of Nursing verified there was no RN working on 10/14/23. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00147089.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-35.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.0M
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 10%Medicare 2%Other / private 88%

This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$395per resident / day
operating cost
$11,994per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$292per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365423. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next