No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Mt Airy Gardens Rehabilitation And Nursing Center

2250 Banning Road, Cincinnati, OH 45239 · For profit - Corporation · 99 certified beds · (513) 591-0400 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citation (F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$10,039 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (68) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $10,039 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-20)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
5944 Colerain Ave · (513) 385-4757 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1829 W Galbraith Rd · (513) 931-2525 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2104 W North Bend Rd · (513) 591-1999 · Call to confirm hours
Park
6409 Simpson Ave · (513) 522-1410 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2129 W North Bend Rd · (513) 681-3340

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.1%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.3%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms83.7%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.5%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened1.9%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.0%25.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine77.6%94.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.7%3.4%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.3%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table2.1%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine14.8%75.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.0%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.8%12.9%12.0%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

33.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.18U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.05hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 33.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge33.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge36.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge43.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.68
RN hours/ resident / day
0.94
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.98
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.60
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.68
RN hoursweekends
60.0%
Total nursing turnover
73.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 93.9 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.34 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.70 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.68 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-02-20)
19
at the previous standard inspection (2021-05-11)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

68 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 57 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of medical record reviews, interviews with resident and facility staff, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff provided adequate supervision to prevent a resident, who had been previously assessed as being at high risk of elopement, from leaving the facility unsupervised. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy when one resident (#26) was placed at potential risk for serious life-threatening harm and/or injury when he eloped from the facility without staff knowledge. Resident #26 was missing for an unknown amount of time and was found by an off-duty employee approximately 0.1 miles from the facility ambulating with a wheeled walker in the middle of a busy, heavily trafficked street, and cars were having to swerve around the resident to avoid hitting him. This affected one (#26) of three residents reviewed for risk of elopement. The facility identified 16 current residents (#03, #04, #05, #06, #07, #08, #11, #12, #13, #14, #16, #19, #21, #22, #23 and #26) at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited beforedisputed · IDR2025-09-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen. This affected all residents except for three residents (#31, #57 and #66) who were identified by the facility as not receiving any food from the kitchen. The facility census was 91.Findings include:Observation of the kitchen on 09/08/25 at 8:20 A.M. revealed a sticky substance on the floor at the entrance to the kitchen, chipped and peeling floor by the walls of the kitchen, a brown substance on the floor under the dishwasher and along the walls of the kitchen, brown debris in two black rubber mats, an uncovered pipe with standing water and a rag in the pipe near the dishwasher, and a second pipe with standing brown water near the dishwasher. Concurrent interview with the Administrator verified the findings. This violation represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number 2580547.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Edisputed · IDR2025-09-08 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was free of pests. This affected all residents except for three residents (#31, #57 and #66) who were identified by the facility as receiving no food from the kitchen. The facility census was 91.Findings include: Observation of the kitchen on 09/08/25 at 8:20 A.M. revealed there were multiple gnats around the dishwasher and trash cans in the kitchen. Concurrent interview with the Administrator verified the gnats around the dishwasher and garbage cans.Interview with Dietary Aide (DA) #174 on 09/08/25 at 8:26 A.M. verified there were multiple gnats around the dishwasher and trash cans in the kitchen. DA #174 stated the facility had experienced an issue with gnats for several weeks.Review of the facility's undated pest control program policy revealed the facility would maintain an effective pest control program that eradicated and contained common household pests.This violation represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number 2580547.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-20 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, review of a scoop size chart, and review of dietary spreadsheets, the the facility failed to ensure appropriate portion sizes were served. This had the potential to affect all 77 residents in the facility. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Observation on 02/19/25 at 11:50 A.M. revealed Dietary [NAME] (DC) #378 was utilizing a green handled scoop for serving macaroni and cheese on the lunch trayline. When queried, DC #378 was unable to say what size scoop she was using for the macaroni and cheese. Review of the dietary spreadsheet for the 2024-2025 fall/winter menus for Wednesday of week two, revealed macaroni and cheese was to be a 4 ounce (oz) serving. Review of the Portion Control Chart, as provided by the facility, revealed a green-handled scoop provided 2 and 2/3 oz and a dark gray handled scoop provided 4 oz. Interview on 02/19/25 at 12:14 P.M., Dietary Director (DD) #371 verified DC #378 was using a green-handled scoop, which provided 2 and 2/3 oz, when the spreadsheet for the meal called for a 4 oz serving, which would have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to store and handle food in a manner to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness. This had the potential to affect all 77 residents in the facility. The facility census was 77. Findings include: 1) Observation of the dry storage area in the kitchen on 02/18/25 at 9:50 A.M., with Dietary Director (DD) #371, revealed a jar of grape jelly, approximately half full, with no open date, and a jug of barbeque sauce, approximately half full and with no open date. Manufacturer labels on both the jelly and barbeque sauce indicated the products needed to be refrigerated after opening. Interview at the same time with DD #371, verified the jelly and barbeque sauce were opened, partially used, not dated, and should have been refrigerated once opened. 2) Observation of the walk-in cooler on 02/18/25 at 9:52 A.M., revealed a plastic crate of milk cartons stored directly on the floor. Interview at the same time with DD #371 verified the milk was stored directly on the floor. 3) Observation of the walk-in freezer on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure catheter bags were covered. This affected two (Residents #235 and #236) of three residents reviewed for catheters. The facility census was 77. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #235 revealed an admission date of 04/14/22 with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, diabetes mellitus type two, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #235 dated 02/10/25 revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment, was always incontinent of bowel, had an indwelling foley catheter, and was dependent on staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the physician's orders for Resident #235 revealed an order dated 08/03/23 for staff to change the indwelling catheter and drainage bag as needed for leakage or blockage. Observation on 02/19/25 at 9:55 A.M. revealed Resident #235 was in his room, and his catheter bag was full of urine which was visible from the hallway.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, resident interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean and homelike environment. This affected one (Residents #59) of four residents reviewed for physician environment and had the potential to affect two (Residents #27 and #238) of seven residents residing on the Heritage nursing unit. The facility census was 77 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #59 revealed an admission date of 04/25/24 with diagnoses including lupus, epilepsy, and hypertension Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #59 dated 01/07/25 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required supervision with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Observation on 02/18/25 at 10:25 A.M. revealed the wall by Resident #59's bathroom door had a missing section of cove base. The sink in the room was not properly secured and was able to be moved in all directions. There was a wide gap with no grout between the countertop and backsplash. The wall between the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed accurately. This affected three (Residents #77, #8, #51) of four residents reviewed for MDS assessment accuracy. The facility census was 77 resident. Finding include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #77 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses including atherosclerosis, urinary tract infections, asthma, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the admission MDS assessment for Resident #77 dated 08/01/24 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the medical record for Resident #77 revealed an entry MDS assessment was completed on 07/25/24, a discharge return anticipated assessment was completed on 07/29/24, and a comprehensive assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 08/01/24 was completed and transmitted. Interview on 02/19/25 at 2:17 P.M. with Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure completion of significant change Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASARRs.) This affected one (Resident #28) of two residents reviewed for PASARR status. The facility census was 77 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an admission date of 03/04/20 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, hypertension, congestive heart failure, unspecified dementia, and schizophrenia. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #28 revealed an order dated 07/18/24 for admission to hospice. Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed the facility completed a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for the resident due to admission to hospice on 07/18/24. Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed the facility did not complete an update PASARR for the resident following the resident's hospice admission. Interview on 02/20/25 at 11:11 A.M. with Social Services Director (SSD) #353…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were updated to accurately reflect resident health care status. This affected one (Resident #72) of three residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 77 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #72 revealed an admission date of 09/25/24 with diagnoses including schizophrenia, subdural hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury, gastrostomy (g-tube) status and dislocation of right acromioclavicular joint. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #72 revealed orders dated 09/25/24 to flush the g-tube with thirty cubic centimeters (cc) of water every shift to maintain patency and orders for a regular diet, regular texture with thin liquids. Review of the plan of care for Resident #72 dated 09/26/24 revealed the resident required tube feeding related to dysphagia with interventions including the following: assess feeding tube placement, patency, and residual every shift and before and after administration of any fluids or medications, check for tube…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure timely suture removal. This affected one Resident (#73) of the one resident reviewed for facial lacerations. The facility census was 77. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #73 revealed an admission date of 12/02/24 with diagnoses including but not limited to history of physical injury and trauma, traumatic brain injury and altered mental status. Review of the plan of care for Resident #73 revealed resident at risk for falls related to balance problems, poor communication and comprehensive, and traumatic brain injury. Interventions include to anticipate and meet needs, follow facility fall protocol and notify physician and power of attorney (POA) of falls. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #73 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired. Review of the hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed Resident #73 fell while at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 57 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received care and services for management of contractures and impaired mobility. This affected three (Residents #9, #72, #51) of three residents reviewed for range of motion services. The facility census was 77 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnosis including peripheral vascular disease, diabetes mellitus, traumatic brain injury, and schizophrenia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #9 dated 12/25/24 for Resident #9 revealed the resident had impaired cognition and required supervision with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the care plan for Resident #9 dated 11/22/22 revealed the resident had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to cardiovascular disease. Interventions included staff to apply a left-hand resting hand orthotic as ordered. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents had fluids available at bedside. This affected one Resident (#08) reviewed for hydration. The facility census was 77. Findings include Medical record for Resident #08 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to dementia with behavioral disturbances and psychotic disorders with delusions. Review of the plan of care for Resident #08 revealed the resident is currently on hospice with diagnoses of moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. Interventions include to provide and serve diet as ordered, monitor and report any signs and symptoms of pocketing, drooling, multiple attempts with swallowing and refusing to eat. Resident #08 received a mechanically altered diet with regular liquids. Review of the physician order for Resident #08 dated 08/02/23 revealed an order for regular diet, mechanical soft texture and thin liquids consistency. Review of the nutritional assessment for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3) Review of the medical record of Resident #06 revealed an admission date of 01/05/22. Diagnoses included dementia with agitation, memory deficit following cerebrovascular disease, type 1 diabetes, history of traumatic brain injury, post-traumatic stress disorder, unspecified convulsions, anxiety, depression, violent behavior, and mood disorder. Review of the physician orders for Resident #06 revealed an order dated 12/23/24 to check laboratory results (labs), including a Depakote level. The frequency of the need for the labs was not specified. Further review of physician orders revealed orders dated 01/07/22 for Depakote tablet Delayed Release (DR) 500 milligrams (mg) twice per day for unspecified convulsions and 08/01/24 for Rexulti (atypical antipsychotic) Oral Tablet two mg one time a day for dementia with agitation. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment for Resident #06 dated 01/24/25, revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident required set-up assistance with eating, supervision for oral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in accordance with professional standards. This affected one Resident (#237) of four resident reviewed for medication administration. The facility was 77. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #237 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, tracheostomy, metabolic encephalopathy, diabetes mellitus type II, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, opioid dependence and congestive heart failure. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #237 dated 02/18/25 was not completed at the time of the survey. Review of the plan of care for Resident #237 was incomplete due to recent admission. Review of the physician orders for the month of February 2025 for Resident #237 revealed an order dated 02/12/25 for Lidocaine external patch 5 percent apply to affected area topically in the evening for pain. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of hospice plan of care and hospice contract, the facility failed to jointly collaborate to develop a comprehensive plan of care that identified services to be provided by both providers. This affected one Resident (#08) of two reviewed for hospice services. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Medical record for Resident #08 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to dementia with behavioral disturbances and psychotic disorders with delusions. Review of the plan of care for Resident #08 revealed resident has an advanced directive do not resuscitate comfort care (DNR-CC) order dated 02/02/2020 with a revision date of 01/30/2024. Resident #08 is currently on hospice with diagnoses of moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. Interventions included to provide and serve diet as ordered, monitor and report any signs and symptoms of pocketing, drooling, multiple attempts with swallowing and refusing to eat. Resident #08…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0914 — isolated
    Provide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the resident bedrooms provided full visual privacy. This affected one (Residents #8) of four residents reviewed for physical environment. The facility census was 77 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 08/03/18 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's dementia, psychotic disorder with delusions, and depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #8 dated 01/29/25 revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Observation on 02/18/25 at 12:29 P.M. revealed Resident #8's room window overlooked the facility parking area, and the window curtains were of a material which permitted observation from the parking lot into the resident's room. In addition, the window curtains were ripped and torn. There was no privacy curtain in the room even though privacy curtain tracking was in place.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, family interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had a safe, clean, comfortable environment. This affected one (Resident #8608) and eight additional residents (#29, #30, #4, #5, #10,#11, #14 and #15) of nine residents' rooms observed. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #8608 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of paranoid schizophrenia, cerebral infarction with right sided hemiplegia and hemiparesis, anemia and congestive heart failure. The resident discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and bed hold was discontinued on 08/04/24. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) discharge return anticipated assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8608 had severe cognitive impairment and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. The resident required set up assistance for eating and was dependent for all other activities of daily living which included oral and personal hygiene, toileting, bathing, dressing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, hospital record review, staff interview, and policy review, revealed the facility failed to ensure residents medications were ordered and administered following a hospital discharge resulting in a significant medication error. This affected one (#11) of three Residents (#11, #12, and #13) reviewed of use of anti-coagulants. The facility census was 83. Findings include: Review of Resident #11's closed medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] Diagnoses included myocardial infarction (heart attack) with cardiac and vascular implants (stents), history of transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and cerebrovascular disease. Resident #11 was discharged to a local hospital on [DATE]. Review of the Discharge Return Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #11 had cognitive deficits and required set up assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of Resident #11's Hospital After Visit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the elevators were maintained in good working order and failed to ensure cigarette butts were disposed of in appropriate containers. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility except the 27 residents who resided on the secured unit of the facility. The facility census was 89. Findings include: 1. Observation on 05/13/24 at 10:00 A.M. revealed there were numerous cigarette butts lying on the ground in front of the facility entrance doors. Observation on 05/14/24 at 8:00 A.M. revealed there continued to be numerous cigarette butts lying on the ground in front of the facility entrance doors, in the mulch across from the facility entrance doors, and in the rocks located beside the facility entrance doors. Observation on 05/14/24 at 4:00 P.M. revealed there were three residents sitting outside within ten feet of the facility entrance doors smoking cigarettes. When finished with the cigarettes, the residents disposed of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, review of the facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to timely notify the resident's representative of a resident's elopement from the facility. This affected one (Resident #26) of three residents reviewed for notification of change. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an initial admission date of 07/12/23. Resident #26 had diagnoses including dementia, altered mental status, cognitive communication deficits, and high blood pressure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/01/24, revealed Resident #26 had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the nursing notes revealed no recollection or documentation providing information on the events of 04/20/24. Review of the social service progress notes from 05/02/24 revealed a late entry note was created for 04/22/24 which documented Social Services Director #200 called to speak with the niece of Resident #26 to discuss future placement of the resident on the secure unit. This was two days after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have handrail tightly and properly attached to walls. This had the potential to affect 58 Residents (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, #37, #38, #39, #40, #41, #42, #43, #44, #45, #46, #47, #48, #49, #50, #51, #52, #53, #54, #55, #56, #57 #58, #59, #60, #61, #62, #63, #64, #65, #66, #67, #68, #69, #70, #71, #72, #73, #74, #75, #76, #77, #78, #79, #80, #81, and #81) identified by the facility as being independently mobile. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Observations of the facility on 02/08/24 from 11:00 A.M. to 11:30 A.M. with the Administrator revealed the handrails were loose and/or missing pieces in the following areas: • Near rooms 116, 126, 200, 117, 222, 203, 204, 219, 200, 225, and 235. • The area between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], and between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. • Near the medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the resident care environment was free of accident hazards. This had the potential to affect the 21 residents (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, and #21) who resided on the secured dementia unit and were identified by the facility as being confused and able to ambulate or propel themselves independently. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Observation on 11/19/23 at 11:00 A.M. on the secured dementia unit of the facility revealed there was a portable space heater approximately three feet long and six inches tall on the floor with the cord taped to the floor and wall of Resident #1's room. The portable spaced heater was plugged into the outlet in the wall and was turned on with heat being put out into the room. There was a warning printed on the top of the portable space heater which read Caution - high temperatures, keep electrical cords, drapes and other furnishings away from the heater. Fire hazard, do not operate without feet attached.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms and common areas were clean and well-maintained. This had the potential to affect the 21 residents (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6. #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, and #21) who resided on the secured dementia unit. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Observation on 11/19/23 at 11:00 A.M. revealed there was dried, red juice on the floor in Resident #1's room. The closet doors were broken and hanging off the tracks. The toilet handle was broken and hanging down. The toilet seat was broken off and lying on the floor beside the toilet. The bathroom light switch cover was missing. Interview on 11/19/23 at 11:25 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #200 confirmed the maintenance and cleanliness concerns observed in Resident #1's room. Observation on 11/19/23 at 11:27 A.M. revealed the dining room floor in the secured dementia unit had black stains across the majority of the floor. The kitchenette located in the dining room had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-20 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide adequate preparation for resident transfer/discharge from the facility. This affected one resident (Resident #70) out of three residents reviewed for transfers and discharges. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #70 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral palsy, diabetes mellitus, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #70 dated 09/29/23 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. Review of nursing and social services notes for Resident #79 revealed they did not include documentation of the resident's request to transfer to another facility. Interview on 11/19/23 at 1:00 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Resident #70 had requested a transfer to a specific facility in the last two weeks. Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-05-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, review of hospital record, review of the facility policy, and review of the online resources the facility failed to implement COVID-19 isolation precautions during resident smoke breaks for Resident #315 which had the potential to affect four residents (#04, #35, #59, #60). The facility failed to perform proper hand hygiene during meal tray pass which had the potential to affect the 24 residents residing on the dementia unit. Also, the facility failed to implement their tuberculosis (TB) control plan for four newly hired employees (Dietary #380, State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #530, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #605 and STNA #640) of nine newly hired employees since the last annual reviewed for having two-step tuberculin skin tests (TSTs). This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. In addition, the facility failed to implement transmission based precautions for two newly admitted residents which had the potential to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, medical record reviews, staff and resident interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received services to accommodate needs and preferences related to room arrangements allowing access to their environment independently, for accessing their call lights when needed and access to their eyeglasses. This affected five (#12, #18, #55, #57, and #165) of five reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility census was 63. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #12's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/03/11, with diagnoses including: hemiplegia and hemiparesis following following cerebral vascular disease affecting left non-dominant side, epilepsy, chronic pain, anxiety disorder, contracture left upper arm, contracture left hand, and primary generalized osteoarthritis. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment of the resident dated 04/01/21 revealed the resident had good memory and recall, and required the extensive assistance of staff to completed activities of daily living with the exception of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-11 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record reviews, staff interviews, activity calendar review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure activities were provided for cognitively impaired residents. This affected four (#19, #27, #46, and #57) of six residents on the unit reviewed for activities during the annual survey. The facility identified 24 residents residing on the unit. The facility census was 63. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/27/18, with diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #19 was moderately impaired. Functional status was supervision from staff for bed mobility and transfers. Review of the Care Plan, dated 04/21/21, revealed he was at risk for decreased activity involvement secondary to Coronavirus restrictions. Interventions were to complete an activity assessment on resident if confined for more than 2-3 days to ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical reocrd review, staff and resident interview, review of the water temperature logs, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment was free of accident hazards, including maintaining hot water temperatures was within the recommended range, ensure a resident at high risk for aspiration was supervised during meals and resident's falls were investigated. This affected two (Resident #12 and #32) of 24 residents reviewed for accident hazards, one (Resident #33) of one resident reviewed for supervision of meals, and two (Resident #70 and #169) of four residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 63. Findings include: 1. On 05/03/21 at 5:47 P.M., an observation of the hot water temperature at Resident #12's hand sink was found to be 125 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Interview with the resident stated she adjusted the water temperature herself and denied any problems with the hot water. 2. On 05/03/21 at 5:50 P.M., an observation of the water…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure the food was stored and prepared under sanitary conditions consistent with professional standards for food service safety. This had the potential to affect all 61 residents who received meals from the kitchen. The facility identified two residents (#52 and #63) who received enteral feedings only. The facility census was 63. Findings include: A tour of the central kitchen was completed on 05/03/21 beginning at 8:46 A.M. While touring the kitchen the following was observed: a) In the dry storage room there was a large bag of flour opened with a Styrofoam bowl in the the flour apparently used for scooping the flour out of the bag. In addition, there was a large opened box of rice on a shelf with a scooping device down in the rice. This was verified by Dietary Supervisor (DS) #700 while touring with the surveyor. b) In the dry storage room there was a four pound jar of grape jelly located on a shelf that had been opened and partially used. The label on the jelly specified to refrigerate the jelly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's advanced directive was accurately recorded in all locations of the medical record to ensure the resident's wishes would be followed as directed in the event of an emergency. This affected two (#17and #65) of two residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/10/13, with diagnoses including: peripheral vascular disease, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, hypertension, alcohol dependence with alcohol-induced persisting dementia, and major depressive disorder. Review of a quarterly minimum data set assessment of the resident dated 04/01/21 revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairments, and was dependent on staff assist in completion of all activities of daily living other than eating. Review of the resident's physician's order in the electronic health record (EHR) revealed an order for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-11 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility documents, the facility failed to ensure the resident's physician documented reasons for resident discharge from the facility in the medical record. This affected one (#169) of four residents reviewed for discharge. The census was 63. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #169 revealed an admission date of 05/04/13 with a diagnosis of hemiplegia and a discharge date of 06/11/20. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #169 dated 04/15/21 revealed resident was cognitively intact and required supervision with activities of daily living. Review of the MDS for Resident #169 dated 06/11/20 revealed resident was discharged with a return not anticipated. Review of the care plan for Resident #169 updated 03/09/20 revealed resident did not show potential for discharge and goal was for resident to have needs met at the facility. Review of the 30-day discharge notice for Resident #169 dated 05/21/20 revealed resident was notified of his upcoming involuntary discharge from the facility by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments included accurate resident body weights. This affected one (#55) of five residents investigated for nutrition. The census was 63. Findings include: Review Resident #55's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/19/21 and a diagnosis of cerebral infarction. Review of preadmission hospital records for Resident #55 dated 02/06/21 revealed resident weighed 145 pounds. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #55 dated 02/23/21 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with two staff with activities of daily living (ADLs) and weighed 174 pounds. Review of the MDS for Resident #55 dated 03/05/21 revealed weighed 175 pounds. Review of the MDS for Resident #55 dated 03/12/21 revealed weighed 174 pounds. Review of the MDS for Resident #55 dated 04/23/21 revealed weighed 139 pounds. Review of the facility weight records for Resident #55 revealed a weight of 175…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-11 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed notify the state mental health authority when a resident with a mental illness had a change of condition and was admitted to hospice. This affected one (#9) of two residents reviewed for significant change Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR). The facility census was 63. Findings include: Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/21/18, with diagnoses including: bipolar disorder, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #9's significant change Minimum Data Sets (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident to be cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, transfers, toileting, and personal hygiene. Resident #9 also required supervision with eating on the 04/01/21 MDS. Review of Resident #9's hospice admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide assistance to a resident who was dependent on staff for grooming and dressing. This affected one (#57) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Review of Resident #57's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/03/18, with medical diagnoses including: dementia with behavioral disturbance, psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition, and Alzheimer's Disease. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was dependent on one staff member to provide bathing and occasionally incontinent of bladder and always continent of bowels. No behaviors toward others occurring and no rejection of care. Review of Resident #57's care plan, dated 03/22/21, revealed a goal of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) will be met daily. Care plan dated 03/22/21 focus was on Resident #57's self-care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure each resident with a limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services, including the use of splinting devices, to increase their range of motion and/or to prevent decline. This affected two residents (#33 and #52) of five residents reviewed for limited range of motion. The facility identified 16 residents with contractures. The facility census was 63. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #33's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance, bipolar disorder, hemiplegia, major depressive disorder, muscle weakness, peripheral vascular disease, and rheumatoid arthritis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/29/21, revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairments, and was required extensive to total assistance from staff to complete all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-11 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to appropriately monitor a resident's dialysis access site. This affected one (Resident #3) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility identified three residents receiving dialysis services. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 05/24/19 with a diagnosis of end stage renal disease (ESRD). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/01/21, revealed the resident was cognitively impaired. Review of the physician's order, dated 05/28/19, revealed the staff should monitor dialysis site to the left upper arm. There was no physician order to monitor the new site to the resident's right arm that was placed May 2020. Review of the nursing progress note, dated 05/05/20, revealed the resident needed to have a new dialysis access site created via a graft to his right arm. Further review of the note revealed the resident was to have new site to right arm created on 05/13/20. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered by the physician. This affected two (Residents #169 and #52) of 26 residents sampled. The census was 63. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #169 revealed an admission date of 05/04/13 with a diagnosis of hemiplegia and a discharge date of 06/11/20. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #169 dated 04/15/21 revealed resident was cognitively intact and required supervision with activities of daily living. Review of the May 2020 Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #169 revealed the resident did not receive his 6:00 P.M. dose on 05/02/20, 05/07/20, 05/21/20, 05/26/20 of the following medications: Flomax (a medication to improve urination), Keppra (an anti-epileptic medication), Norvasc (a blood pressure medication), metoprolol (a blood pressure medication). Review of the nurse progress notes for Resident #169 dated 05/02/20 through…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the hospital records, staff interview, review of online medication resource Medscape, and policy review, the facility failed to appropriately monitor residents for the administration of anticoagulant and anti-seizure medication. This affected two residents (#55 and #52) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 63. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #55 revealed an admission date of 02/19/21 and a diagnosis of cerebral infarction. Review of the MDS for Resident #55 dated 03/05/21 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with two staff with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the hospital continuity of care form dated 02/19/21 for Resident #55 revealed the resident was to receive Coumadin three milligram (mg) tablet once per day. Review of admission physician orders for Resident #55 dated 02/19/21 revealed an order for Coumadin three mg once daily. Review of admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of the online medication resource Medscape, and policy review the facility failed to ensure the use of antipsychotic medications appropriately. This affected two residents (#55 and #64) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 63. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #55 revealed an admission date of 02/19/21 and a diagnosis of cerebral infarction. Review of the face sheet for Resident #55 revealed resident was [AGE] years of age. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance with two staff with activities of daily living (ADLs), was coded negative for the presence of behavioral symptoms, received antipsychotic medication on seven out of seven days during the review period, and was not coded for any psychiatric diagnoses. Review of the May 2021 physician orders for Resident #55 revealed an order for the antipsychotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the hospital records, staff interview, review of online medication resource Medscape, and policy review, the facility failed to administer anticoagulant medication as ordered by the physician resulting in a significant medication error. This affected one resident (#55) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 63. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #55 revealed an admission date of 02/19/21 and a diagnosis of cerebral infarction. Review of the MDS for Resident #55 dated 03/05/21 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with two staff with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the hospital continuity of care form dated 02/19/21 for Resident #55 revealed the resident was to receive Coumadin three milligram (mg) tablet once per day. Review of admission physician orders for Resident #55 dated 02/19/21 revealed an order for Coumadin three mg once daily. Review of admission note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-11 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility documents and policy, the facility failed to provide resident with a snack when he went to outpatient dialysis treatments. This affected one resident (#3) of one reviewed for dialysis. The census was 63. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #03 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included end stage renal disease (ESRD). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #03 revealed resident was cognitively impaired and required supervision with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the physician order for Resident #03 dated 05/28/19 revealed the resident attended dialysis three times weekly on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. Review of the care plan for Resident #03 dated 10/30/20 revealed resident was at nutritional risk related to ESRD and required hemodialysis three times weekly and was underweight. Interventions included the facility would provide the resident a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, review of the dietary tray card, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that each resident's medical record contained accurately documented information regarding nutritional supplements ordered and provided, skin care documented, and care planned advanced directive information. This affected three (#33 and #169) residents of 26 resident records reviewed. Findings include: 1. Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance, bipolar disorder, hemiplegia, major depressive disorder, muscle weakness, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes mellitus type 2, rheumatoid arthritis, hypertension, and heart failure. Review of a quarterly minimum data set assessment completed for the resident dated 01/29/21 revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment, and required extensive to total assistance of staff to completed all activities of daily living. Review of the resident's physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-11 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident had a working call light. This affected one (#215) of 26 residents reviewed. The facility census was Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #215 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included heart failure and dementia. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance for all activities of daily living except eating, which he only required supervision of one person. Observation on 05/03/21 at 10:05 A.M. revealed Resident #215 was yelling for help from his room. At 10:15 A.M., Resident #215 turned the call light on however, the light on the outside of the door would not light up. Interview on 05/03/21 at 10:20 A.M., State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #365 verified the call light over Resident #215's door was not working. Interview on 05/05/21 at 9:10 A.M., STNA #730 verified the call light…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2019-03-07 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on personnel file review, education record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate nurse aide in-servicing was provided based on performance review. This had the potential to affect all 87 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of personnel file for State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #10 revealed a hire date of 01/30/04. Further review of the personnel file for STNA #10 revealed the employee had a satisfactory annual performance review on 02/01/19. Review of the education records for STNA #10 revealed the employee had only one hour of in-service education in a 12 month period from February 2018 through February 2019. Interview with Human Resources Director #227 on 03/06/19 at 1:54 P.M. confirmed STNA #10 had only one hour of in-service education in a 12 month period from February 2018 through February 2019.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-03-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #25 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, schizoaffective disorder, diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, antisocial personality disorder, diabetic neuropathy, conversion disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, delusional disorders, heart failure, mastopathy of unspecified breast, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, bipolar disorder. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition, displayed no verbal or physical behavioral symptoms or rejection of care, and required supervision for activities of daily living (ADL's). Further review of Resident#25's medical record revealed the pharmacist conducted monthly regimen reviews from 10/2018 through 02/2019. The medical record contained no evidence that the pharmacist reviewed the resident's drug regimen from admission [DATE] through 09/2018. Interview on 03/06/19 at 5:11 PM, the DON verified the medical record contained no evidence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical interview, observation, resident and staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated in a dignified manner in regards to leaving a hospital bracelet on. This affected one Resident (#67) of one reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses; non traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, acquired absence of other organs, unspecified intracranial injury with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration, other acquired deformity of head, major depressive disorder, gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, hypertension, neurovascular disease, brief psychotic disorder, pedestrian injured in unspecified traffic accident, pulmonary embolism, cocaine abuse and peripheral vascular disease. Review of Resident #67's quarterly Minimum Data Sets (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-07 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident fund account review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify Medicaid residents when the amount in their resident's funds account reached 200 dollars of the eligibility limit. This affected two (#29 and #75) of five residents reviewed for resident funds accounts. The facility census was 87 Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses; altered mental status, dysphagia, protein calorie malnutrition, personal history of traumatic brain injury, psychosis, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, essential hypertension, acute and subacute endocarditis, gastrostomy status, chronic kidney disease, muscle weakness, anemia, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris and dementia without behavioral disturbance. Review of Resident #29's quarterly Minimum Data Sets (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, hospital record review, observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify each resident's physician when there was a significant weight loss and a need to alter nutrition interventions. This affected one Resident (#65) of five reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance, pneumonia, diabetes mellitus type 3, old myocardial infarction, cerebral infarction, hypertension, conversion disorder with seizures and convulsion, weakness, bipolar disorder, dysphagia following cerebral infarction, and encounter for attention to gastrostomy. Review of the minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified the resident as having short term and long term memory problems, severely impaired cognitive skills, and requiring the physical assistance of one to two staff persons to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the heat in a resident's room was working and the temperature was maintained to provide comfort to the resident. This affected one Resident (#51) of 24 residents reviewed for comfortable room temperatures. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses; diabetes mellitus due to underlying condition with diabetic neuropathy, malignant neoplasm of the bladder, hypertension, symbolic dysfunctions, difficulty in walking, unspecified focal traumatic brain injury without loss of consciousness, hyperlipidemia and intestinal malabsorption. Review of Resident #51's quarterly Minimum Data Sets (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required limited assistance with bed mobility, toileting and personal hygiene. Resident #51 also required supervision with eating,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-07 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to notify the ombudsman of discharges from the facility. This affected three Resident's (#24, #62 and #65) of five residents reviewed for discharge notification. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of the medial record revealed Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses; hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side, muscle spasm, chronic pain, generalized osteoarthritis, personal history of malignant neoplasm of breast, contracture, major depressive disorder, cognitive communication deficit, allergic rhinitis, gastro esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, epilepsy, dysphagia, cerebrovascular disease, muscle weakness, biliary acute pancreatitis with infected necrosis and hyperlipidemia. Review of Resident #24's quarterly Minimum Data Sets (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-07 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medial record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident medications and mobility statuses were accurately coded on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. This affected two Resident's (#8 and #68) of 18 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses; hypovolemia, atrial fibrillation, cerebral infarction, weakness, fall, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, mixed hyperlipidemia, major depressive disorder, collapsed vertebra, wedge compression fracture of first lumbar vertebra, low back pain and hypertension. Review of Resident #8's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene. Resident #8 also required supervision with eating and total dependence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, shower documentation review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was implemented for resident bathing and skin care needs. This affected two Resident's (#24 and #32) of 18 residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses; gastro esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, epilepsy, dysphagia, major depressive disorder, chronic pain., hemiplegia and hemiparesis, muscle spasm, muscle weakness, contracture cerebrovascular disease, primary generalized osteoarthritis, personal history of malignant neoplasm of breast, allergic rhinitis, hyperlipidemia and biliary acute pancreatitis with infected necrosis. Review of Resident #24's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required total dependence with bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident bathing and nutritional care plans were reviewed and revised. This affected two Resident's (# 65 and #78) of 18 residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record review revealed Resident #78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses; hypothyroidism, secondary hypertension, pain, change in bowel habit, nausea, migraine without aura, major depressive disorder and allergy unspecified. Review of Resident #78's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance with bed mobility and transfers. Resident #78 also required total dependence with personal hygiene, toileting and dressing and supervision with eating. Further review of the MDS revealed the resident required total dependence with a two plus person assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, shower documentation review, resident and staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure residents were provided adequate assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) related to bathing. This affected three Resident's #24, #25 and #78 of three reviewed for ADL's. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #24's was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses; gastro esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, epilepsy, dysphagia, major depressive disorder, chronic pain., hemiplegia and hemiparesis, muscle spasm, muscle weakness, contracture cerebrovascular disease, primary generalized osteoarthritis, personal history of malignant neoplasm of breast, allergic rhinitis, hyperlipidemia and biliary acute pancreatitis with infected necrosis. Review of Resident #24's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate care for an existing skin condition, and for proper positioning when seated in a wheel chair. This affected two Residents (#29 and #32) of 22 residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #32 was admitted to the facility in March of 2014 with current diagnoses including dementia without behavioral disturbance, cerebral infarction, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, hemiplegia, anemia, expressive language disorder, and other specified disorder of bone density and structure. Review of the minimum data set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] identified the resident as having short and long term memory problems, severely impairer cognitive skills, and requiring the physical assistance of at least one staff person for all activities of daily living. the resident had limitations in her range of motion on one side…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident received timely interventions to address significant weight loss and maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status. This involved one Resident (#65) of five residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 87 Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance, pneumonia, diabetes mellitus type 3, old myocardial infarction, cerebral infarction, hypertension, conversion disorder with seizures and convulsion, weakness, bipolar disorder, dysphagia following cerebral infarction, and encounter for attention to gastrostomy. Review of the minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified the resident as having short term and long term memory problems, severely impaired cognitive skills, and requiring the physical assistance of one to two staff persons to complete all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, review of employee files, review of staff inservice records, review of facility policy, and review of Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines the facility failed to ensure a resident's tracheostomy care was performed in a manner consistent with professional standards and that appropriate signage was posted on the doors of resident's rooms where oxygen was stored or in use in a facility that permits smoking on the premises. This affected one (#7) of one resident the facility identified as requiring tracheostomy care and two (#25 and #233) of eight residents the facility identified as using oxygen. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #7 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including including chronic respiratory failure, osteoporosis with pathological fracture, gastrostomy, tracheostomy, effusion of unspecified knee, joint contracture, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-07 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility had sufficient staff to perform bathing services. This affected three Resident's (#24, #25 and #78) of 18 residents reviewed for staffing. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #24's was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses; gastro esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, epilepsy, dysphagia, major depressive disorder, chronic pain., hemiplegia and hemiparesis, muscle spasm, muscle weakness, contracture cerebrovascular disease, primary generalized osteoarthritis, personal history of malignant neoplasm of breast, allergic rhinitis, hyperlipidemia and biliary acute pancreatitis with infected necrosis. Review of Resident #24's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required total dependence with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and toileting. Resident #24 also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-07 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, review of employee files, review of staff inservice records, review of facility policy, and review of Center for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines the facility failed to ensure a resident's tracheostomy care was performed in a manner consistent with professional standards. This affected one (#7) of one resident the facility identified as requiring tracheostomy care. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #7 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including including chronic respiratory failure, osteoporosis with pathological fracture, gastrostomy, tracheostomy, effusion of unspecified knee, joint contracture, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, heart failure, kidney failure, anemia, hemiplegia left side, aphasia, dysphagia, diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, specified cardiac arrhythmias, and persistent vegetative state. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-07 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff attempted non pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of a pain medication. This affected one Resident (#8) of six reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses; hypovolemia, atrial fibrillation, cerebral infarction, weakness, fall, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, mixed hyperlipidemia, major depressive disorder, collapsed vertebra, wedge compression fracture of first lumbar vertebra, low back pain and hypertension. Review of Resident #8's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene. Resident #8 also required supervision with eating and total dependence with transfers. Per the MDS the resident received one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident's receiving psychotropic medications had adequate indications for use, and received monitoring for possible side effects. This affected two Residents (#54 and #70) of seven residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with current diagnoses of major depressive disorder recurrent moderate, dementia without behavior disturbance, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, glaucoma, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and alcohol abuse. Review of a quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified the resident as having significant memory and recall problems, but without hallucinations, delusions, or behaviors. The resident required the physical assistance of at least one nursing staff person to complete all activities of daily living with the exception of eating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, review of list of residents and review of the facility's medication storage policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident's medications were given and stored in a secured manner. This affected one Resident (#14) who was observed with loose medications in his room. The facility identified two Residents (#12 and #54) as being cognitively impaired and independently mobile residents on the second floor. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnosis included hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dementia, hyperlipidemia, manic schizophrenia, and asthma. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe impaired cognition. During observation of medication administration on 03/06/19 at 9:17 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #34, revealed various loose medications inside a residents room. When LPN #34 entered residents room to administer the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR), Treatment Administration Record (TAR) and dialysis documentation was complete and accurate in his medical record. This affected one Resident (#62) of 18 residents reviewed for complete and accurate medical records. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses; chronic kidney disease, paraplegia, pressure ulcer of other site, colostomy status, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, cardiac arrhythmia, pyoderma, disorder of kidney and ureter, gastro esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis and acquired absence of unspecified leg above knee. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required supervision with bed mobility, transfers, eating, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, review of facility policy, review of Centers for Disease Control guidelines and review of facility census of the second floor the facility failed to ensure a resident's tracheostomy care was performed in a manner to limit the risk of infection. This affected one (#7) of one resident the facility identified as requiring tracheostomy care. The facility also failed to secure and dispose of used disposable razors in a manner that promoted infection control. This had the potential to affect eight Residents (#14, #18, #27, #51, #53, #58, #60 and #284) whom the facility identified as being independent with showers on the second floor. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #7 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including including chronic respiratory failure, osteoporosis with pathological fracture, gastrostomy, tracheostomy, effusion of unspecified knee, joint contracture, chronic obstructive pulmonary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-07 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident's call lights were functioning to allow residents them to call staff for assistance. This affected one (#235) of 24 residents reviewed for call light function. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #235 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebrovascular vascular disease, fracture of right tibia legal blindness, muscle wasting, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. The assessment documented the resident was dependent on staff for activities of daily living including one-person extensive assistance for bed mobility, dressing, and toilet use; and required two-person extensive assistance for transfers. Review of the care plan dated 02/06/19 revealed Resident #235 had a self-care deficit related to fracture of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-05-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility policy, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure there was an interdisciplinary team for the resident's care conference meetings. This affected four residents (Residents #5, #7, #26, and #67) of four residents reviewed for care planning and care conferences. The facility census was 88. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #5 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included seizures, convulsions, muscle weakness, peripheral vascular disease, depression, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 had severe cognitive impairments. Review of the care conference notes dated 03/27/24 revealed only two staff participants during the completion of this care conference. Social Services Director (SSD) #200 and MDS Nurse #340 attended the care conference. Interview with SSD #200 on 05/16/24 at 12:15 P.M. verified care conferences should be held with all members of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2019-03-07 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of quality assessment and assurance (QAA) sign in sheets and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the QAA committee met at least quarterly at the facility and consisted of the required members. This had the potential to affect all 87 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of the facility's QAA committee sign-in sheets revealed meetings were held on 03/27/18 and 06/29/18 that did not contain the signature of the medial director or designee. There was no other documentation that a QAA meeting was held until 11/30/18, and the sign-in sheet did not contain the signature of the facility's administrator. Interview on 03/05/19 at 4:00 P.M., the Administrator verified there was no documented evidence of a QAA meeting held between 06/29/18 and 11/30/18, and verified the sign-in sheets dated 03/27/18, 06/29/18, and 11/30/18 did not have the required members as noted above.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$10,039 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $10,039 — penalty dated 2024-05-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
AIRY OPCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/08/2023
AIRY HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST81%since 06/08/2023
SHAPIRO, NAFTALIIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR19%since 06/08/2023
RIVERA, EMMANUELIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/08/2023
OWENS, KARRIEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 09/01/2024
AIRY MANAGEMENTOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/08/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-11.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$642K
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 26%Medicare 4%Other / private 70%

This home reported $642K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$315per resident / day
operating cost
$9,582per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$282per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365293. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next