Mt Healthy Christian Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 135 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 36.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 57 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 75 beds and averages 65.5 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.99 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.83 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.86 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.04 on weekdays — 3% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Actual harm · G2024-04-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent falls with injury. This resulted in Actual Harm to dependent Resident #20 when a staff member who was providing incontinence care to the resident without additional staff assistance turned away from the resident to discard cleaning materials and the resident fell from the bed. Resident #20 sustained the following injuries from the fall from the bed: a scalp laceration which required repair with sutures, a sternal fracture, a fracture of the left clavicle, a fracture of the second rib on the left side, a closed fracture of the spinous process of the thoracic vertebra and the transverse process of the lumbar vertebra. This affected one (Resident #20) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 02/02/19 with diagnoses including type two diabetes, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, dysphagia, cerebrovascular disease,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2021-10-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, review of facility policy, and review of online resources per the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) the facility failed to ensure staff wore appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) to prevent the spread of Coronavirus (COVID-19). This had the potential to affect 13 (Residents #4, #7, #10, #20, #21, #25, #31, #32, #34, #41, #44, #53 and #54)residing on the Five South Unit; and failed to ensure staff practiced appropriate hand hygiene during meal service. This affected three (Residents #3, #14 and #28) of 18 residents observed for meal service on the Four North Unit. The census was 63. Findings include: 1. During observation on 10/12/21 at 11:30 A.M., State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #98 was eating in the resident lounge area and was not wearing PPE. During interview on 10/12/21 at 11:30 A.M., STNA #98 confirmed she was not wearing PPE and was eating while in the resident area. During interview on 10/14/21 at 11:37 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed staff should wear…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-10-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident's wheelchair was equipped with a calf board and foot rests. This affected one (Resident #2) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living assistance. The census was 63. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia without behavioral disturbance and osteoarthritis. Review of the minimum date set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 had moderately impaired cognition, and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers and locomotion. Review of care plan dated 09/30/2021 revealed Resident #2 had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to weakness, pain due to osteoarthritis and leg contractures. She required a calf board to the wheelchair due to the leg contractures. During observation on 10/12/21 at 11:04 A.M. revealed Resident #2 was seated in her wheelchair with no foot pedals or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-10-18 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assisted with placement of hearing aids. This affected one (Resident #34) of three residents reviewed for hearing impairment. The census was 63. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 01/26/21 with a diagnosis of acute congestive heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #34 dated 08/24/21 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance of two staff with activities of daily living (ADL). She had a communication impairment and required the use of bilateral hearing aids to hear adequately. Review of the care plan dated 02/03/21 revealed resident had a communication impairment and required bilateral hearing aids to hear adequately. Interventions included the following: assist to wear hearing aids daily, maintain hearing aids in good working order, keep clean and replace batteries as needed, arrange for maintenance as needed. Review of the nurse aide assignment sheet for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2019-03-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, pharmacy Recommended Minimum Medication Storage Parameters, and Aplisol manufacturing recommendations for storage, the facility failed to properly store, label, and dispose open vials of medications. This had the potential to affect 22 new admissions within the last 30 days. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Observation on 03/13/19 at 10:30 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #90 of the fifth floor medication room revealed an open vial of Aplisol (tuberculin PPD) with no open date on label. Interview on 03/13/19 at 10:33 A.M. with LPN #90 verified that the vial of Aplisol was open and did not know the date it was opened. Observation on 03/13/19 at 10:46 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #144 of the Rehab floor medication room revealed an open vial of Aplisol in the refrigerator with no date on the label. Interview on 03/13/19 at 10:49 A.M. with RN #144 verified that there was no date on the vial of Aplisol and was not aware of when it was opened. Review of the pharmacy Recommended Minimum Medication Storage Parameters (dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2019-03-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, review of facility policy and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff provided a dignified dining experience while feeding Resident #56 during meal time. This affected one (#56) of four residents who were total dependent for assistance in eating on the fifth floor. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, dementia, macular degeneration, adult failure to thrive and pain. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/05/18, revealed Resident #56 was severely impaired and required extensive assistance with two people assistance for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Resident #56 was unable to make daily decisions, had unclear speech, rarely understood others and vision was highly impaired. Observations on 03/12/19 at 5:55 P.M., revealed State Tested Nursing Assistant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• No harm found · C2019-03-14 · tag F0577 — widespread
  Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to display the Ohio Department of Health survey results, where residents and visitors could visibly access them. This had the potential to affect all 69 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: A tour of the fourth and fifth floor of the facility on 03/11/19 at 7:00 P.M., revealed the Survey Results were not readily accessible to residents or visitors without having to ask for them. No sign was posted to identify where the survey results were located. On 03/12/19 at 4:13 P.M., during the resident council meeting, Residents #7, #10, #20, #25, #44 and #52 reported they were unaware of the posting of the Ohio Department of Health survey results. Observation on 03/12/19 at 5:00 P.M., revealed first floor, fourth floor and fifth floor showed no signs posted to identify where survey results were located. On 03/12/19 at 6:30 P.M., interview with Activities Director (AD) #77 revealed the State Survey Results were on first floor but only had 2016 results. AD #77 verified that residents and visitors on all three…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $349K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH