Woods Edge Rehab And Nursing
1171 Towne Street, Cincinnati, OH 45216 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 93 certified beds · (513) 242-1360 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $21,645 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-30)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (61%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 2.1% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.1% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 42.3% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.3% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 0.6% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 22.0% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.7% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.6% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.2% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 17.5% | 8.8% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.9% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 93 beds and averages 80.7 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.48 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
45 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, review of the facility's investigation, review of witness statements, review of the facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRI), review of emergency medical services (EMS) report, review of hospital records, review of emergency room (ER) notes, review of the local weather report, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and implement timely interventions for exit-seeking behaviors for Resident #11, to prevent his elopement from the facility. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious life-threatening harm and/or death on [DATE] when Resident #11 broke the window and exited the secured building by jumping out of the second story window, approximately 15 feet from the ground level. Resident #11 suffered an open fracture to the left ankle as a result of the jump. This affected one (Resident #11) of three residents reviewed for elopements. The facility identified 18 residents who were at risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen. This had the potential to affect 75 of 77 residents who received food from the kitchen. Two residents received no food by mouth. The facility census was 77 residents.Findings include: 1.Observation on 04/13/26 at 9:06 A.M. of two deep freezers with Dietary Manager (DM) #12 revealed there was debris and scum at the bottom of each deep freezer. In one of the freezers there were 100 unlabeled and undated strawberry shortcakes and 50 unlabeled and undated vanilla pudding cups. One deep freezer did not have a thermometer. Observation of the food preparation area revealed there was no soap in the dispenser at the sink used for staff hand hygiene. A box of hair nets contained a dirty used facemask and two used hair nets. Observation of walk-in freezer revealed it contained two unlabeled and undated pitchers of juice. Observation of the walk-in refrigerator revealed it contained the following unlabeled and undated items: 10 sandwiches, 25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to properly label and store medications. This affected seven residents (Resident #20, Resident #55, Resident #36, Resident #37, Resident #58, Resident #75, and Resident #7) of 18 residents reviewed for medication storage. The facility census was 77 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with a diagnosis of type two diabetes. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #20 revealed an order dated [DATE] for insulin glargine 12 units subcutaneously at bedtime. Observation on [DATE] at 10:15 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #112 revealed Resident #20's insulin glargine was opened and had not been dated. Interview on [DATE] at 10:16 A.M with LPN #112 confirmed Resident #20's insulin glargine had not been dated upon opening. 2.) Review of the medical record for Resident #55 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach. This affected one (Resident #47) of 18 residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 77 residents.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 04/14/17 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, cardiomegaly, peripheral vascular disease, and schizoaffective disorder, Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #47 dated 03/09/26 revealed the resident was moderately cognitive impaired and was dependent on staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the care plan for Resident #47 dated 03/22/26 revealed the resident had an ADL deficit and the staff were to encourage the resident to use the call light to request assistance. Observation on 04/13/26 at 11:47 A.M. revealed Resident #47 was lying in bed and the call light was hanging on the wall out of reach of the resident. Interview on 04/13/26 at 11:50 A.M. with Resident #47 confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary environment. This affected one (Resident #38) of 18 residents sampled. The facility census was 77 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 02/15/23 with diagnoses including obsessive-compulsive disorder, delusional disorder, psychosis, and major depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #38 dated 03/21/26 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required supervision with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Observation on 04/13/26 at 12:05 P.M. revealed the wall air conditioning unit next to Resident #38's bed was covered with a black substance. Interview on 04/13/26 at 11:45 AM with Resident #38 confirmed he was concerned about the black substance on his air conditioning unit because he thought it could negatively impact his health. Interview on 04/13/26 at 12:05 P.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, review of the facility fall investigation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide adequate the adequate level of supervision and assistance during care to prevent falls. This affected one (Resident #84) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 77 residents.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #84 revealed an admission date of 12/06/26 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting left non-dominant side, and paranoid schizophrenia. Review of the fall risk assessment for Resident #84 completed 12/06/25 revealed the resident was at moderate risk for falls. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #84 dated 12/11/25 revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and was dependent on staff for toileting, dressing, bathing, personal hygiene, and turning and repositioning. Review of the care plan for Resident #84 dated 12/08/25 revealed the resident had a self-care deficit, impaired cognition, and was at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure nurses performed appropriate hand hygiene during medication administration. This affected three residents (Resident #11, Resident #76 and Resident # 38) of five residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 77 residents.Findings include: 1.Observation on 04/15/26 at 8:30 A.M. of medication administration per Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #6 revealed the nurse popped Resident #11's medications out of the package into her bare hand and placed the pills in the medication cup. Interview on 04/15/26 at 9:00 A.M. with LPN #6 verified she should not touch resident medications with her bare hand. 2.Observation on 04/15/26 at 9:00 A.M. of medication administration per LPN #6 revealed the nurse did not wash or sanitize her hands before administering medications to Resident #76. Interview on 04/15/26 at 9:40 A.M. with LPN #6 confirmed she had not washed or sanitized her hands prior to medication administration to Resident #76. 3. Observation on 04/15/26 at 2:15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that residents were offered the pneumococcal vaccine upon admission and annually. This affected three residents (Resident #22, #38, and Resident #2) of five residents reviewed for vaccines. The facility census was 77 residents.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 05/21/18 with diagnoses including alcoholic cirrhosis of liver without ascites, unspecified dementia, and schizophrenia. Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed the resident received one pneumonia vaccine on 10/17/25 and the facility did not offer additional pneumonia vaccines. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 03/14/26 with diagnoses including anoxic brain damage, hypertension, and chronic diastolic heart failure. Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed the resident was not offered the pneumonia vaccine nor the influenza vaccine upon admission. 3. Review of the medical record for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to offer Coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines to residents upon admission and annually. This affected two residents (Resident #2 and Resident #38) of five residents reviewed for vaccines. The facility census was 77 residents.Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 03/14/26 with diagnoses including anoxic brain damage, hypertension, and chronic diastolic heart failure. Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed the resident was not offered the COVID-19 vaccine upon admission. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 03/13/24 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, major depressive disorder, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed the resident was not offered the COVID-19 vaccine upon admission. Interview on 04/16/26 at 9:30 A.M with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Residents #2 and #38 were not offered the COVID-19…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's falls were thoroughly investigated, properly documented in the medical record, a fall risk assessment was completed, a post-fall evaluation completed and assure immediate fall interventions were implemented. This affected one (Resident #39) of the three residents review for falls. The facility also failed to ensure residents were assessed following a fall. This affected one (Resident #49) out of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #49 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, delusional disorder, essential primary hypertension, major depressive disorder, hypothyroidism, osteoarthritis, urinary tract infection, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #49, revealed the resident was cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control techniques were properly maintained during wound care. This affected one (Resident #15) of three Residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #15 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included hemiparesis/hemiplegia, Alzheimer's dementia with associated cognitive and decision-making impairments, peripheral vascular disease, and hypertension. Resident #15 required a guardian for his care. Resident #15 was ordered to be in Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) (an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDROs] in nursing homes). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #15 was cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL). Was assessed to have a stage IV pressure ulcer (a severe, full-thickness…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 34 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control techniques were properly maintained during wound care. This affected one (Resident #15) of three Residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 75. Findings include:Medical record review for Resident #15 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included hemiparesis/hemiplegia, Alzheimer ' s dementia with associated cognitive and decision-making impairments, peripheral vascular disease, and hypertension. Resident #15 required a guardian for his care. Resident #15 was ordered to be in Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) (an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDROs] in nursing homes). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #15 was cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL). Was assessed to have a stage IV pressure ulcer (a severe,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review medication administration records and controlled drug records, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure administration of a narcotic pain medication was documented on the medication administration record. This affected one (#13) of three residents reviewed for medication administration documentation. The facility census was 83. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, osteoporosis, uterine cancer, and chronic pain. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 had severe cognitive impairment and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. The resident required supervision with eating and was dependent for oral and personal hygiene, toileting, bathing, dressing, bed mobility, and transfers. Review of the census profile revealed Resident #13 transitioned to hospice services on 08/14/24. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to properly label prepared foods in the refrigerator. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility who receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Observation and interview on 03/18/25 at 8:53 A.M. with Kitchen Supervisor (KS) #43 revealed during a tour of the kitchen, there were two trays of sandwiches, one tray of bowls of mandarin oranges, and three trays of cups of juice that were not labeled or dated inside the refrigerator. KS #43 verified the two trays of sandwiches, one tray of bowls of mandarin oranges, and three trays of cups of juice were not labeled or dated. KS #43 stated they should be labeled and dated. Review of the facilities Dietary/Food Handling policy dated 01/2023 revealed food is to be dated and labeled upon arrival from vendor and/or upon preparation date. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00162926.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observations and record review, the facility failed to serve specialized diets as planned by the Registered Dietitian (RD). This affected 15 residents, (#01, #15, #20, #21, #22, #32, #41, #52, #61, #66, #67, #69, #72, #77, and #87) of the 89 residents receiving food from the kitchen. The facility census was 90. Findings Include: Review of the physician orders revealed Residents #01 and #69 had diet orders for puree food texture consistency. Residents #15, #20, #21, #22, #32, #41, #52, #61, #66, #67, #72, #77, and #87 had physician orders for a mechanical soft food texture consistency. Review of the lunch menu diet spreadsheet revealed the puree texture diet was to be served puree green beans. The mechanical foods texture diets were to be served green beans. Observation on 11/04/24 at 11:40 A.M. of the lunch meal service revealed the puree texture diets of Resident #01 and #69 and mechanical soft texture diets for Residents #15, #20, #21, #22, #32, #41, #52, #61, #66, #67, #72, #77, and #87 received no green beans or other like vegetable. Interview on 11/04/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, observations and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent the elopement of one (#59) of the three residents reviewed. The facility census was 90. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #59 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included schizophrenia, dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, drug abuse, and tobacco use. Review of a physician order dated 01/24/24 for Resident #59, revealed the resident was ordered to be on a secured unit due to vascular dementia and schizophrenia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #59 had moderately impaired cognition and was independent for ambulation. The resident resided on a secured behavior unit. Review of the most recent care plan for Resident #59, revealed the resident resided on a secured unit to promote the resident's safety related to cognitive impairment, elopement risk, exit seeking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed and residents were notified of menu changes prior to the meal. This had the potential to affect 88 of 89 residents. The facility identified one Resident (Resident #33) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 89. Findings include: During observations on 06/03/24 between 10:50 A.M. and 11:10 A.M., the menus posted on each unit indicated the residents were to receive turkey and rice casserole, green peas, and a biscuit for the supper meal on 06/03/24 and were to receive a baked pork chop, stuffing, green beans, and a dinner roll for the supper meal on 06/02/24. Review of the menu for the current week had had turkey and rice casserole, green peas, and a biscuit for the supper meal on 06/02/24. Review of the Daily Menu for 06/02/24 listed a baked pork chop, stuffing, green beans, and a dinner roll for supper The menu for 06/03/24 had turkey and rice casserole, green peas, and a biscuit for the supper meal. During an observation on 06/03/24 at 4:44 P.M., the tray…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure recipes were followed and that the food was visually appealing. This had the potential to affect 88 of 89 residents. The facility identified one resident (Resident #33) who did not receive meals from the kitchen. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of the menu for the current week revealed the residents were to receive an open-faced turkey sandwich with gravy, roasted potatoes, and a California vegetable blend for lunch on 06/03/24. Review of the daily menu for 06/03/24 revealed the residents were to receive an open faced turkey sandwich with gravy, mashed potatoes, and a California vegetable blend. Review of the recipe revealed the open faced turkey sandwich was to consist of a slice of toast with three ounces of sliced turkey, mashed potatoes on top of the turkey, and turkey gravy over the sandwich. During observations on 06/03/24 between 12:10 P.M. and 1:00 P.M., residents on all units received a piece of white bread with a chopped meat with a reddish-brown gravy served on top with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure employees wore hair nets while preparing and serving food and beverages. This had the potential to affect 88 of 89 residents. The facility identified one resident (Resident #33) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 89. Findings include: During an observation on 06/03/24 at 4:28 P.M., Dietary Aide (DA) #415 was standing at the juice machine in the kitchen, pouring drinks, in preparation for the dinner meal. DA #415 was not wearing a hairnet. During interview at the time of the observation, Dietary Supervisor (DS) #405 verified DA #415 was not wearing a hairnet and told DA #415 to go put a hairnet on. During an observation on 06/03/24 at 4:29 P.M., DA #415 put a hairnet on, however his braids were not fully covered. During observation on 06/03/24 at 4:34 P.M., Dietary [NAME] (DC) #430 was standing at the steam table stirring the food that would be served for the dinner meal. DC #430 was wearing a hairnet, however her braids were sticking outside of the hairnet, not fully…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were fed in a safe and dignified manner. This affected one (Resident #64) of one resident reviewed for dignity. This had the potential to affect all 89 residents in the facility. Findings include: During an observation on 06/03/24 at 12:21 P.M., State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #300 was standing in the hallway at the nurse station on the 400-hall feeding Resident #64. Resident #64 was seated in a reclining geri-chair facing away from the nurse station. STNA #300 was standing behind Resident #64, reaching around him and putting food into his mouth. There was a cart containing trays for the lunch meal approximately three feet away from the resident's geri-chair. There was no chair in the vicinity for STNA #300 to sit on. During an interview at the time of the observation, STNA #300 verified she was standing to feed Resident #64 and was not facing him as she fed him. STNA #300 stated she was standing to feed Resident #64 because the cart was in her way. STNA #300 did not say why she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's compression stockings were applied as ordered to treat edema. This affected one (Resident #80) of three residents reviewed for edema. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #80 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included nerve root and plexus disorder, wernicke's encephalopathy, alcohol abuse with alcohol-induced sleep disorder, insomnia, legal blindness, depression, anxiety, and iron deficiency anemia. Resident #80 had a physician order 05/24/24 to apply compression wraps to bilateral lower extremities, on in the morning, off at night. During an observation on 06/03/24 at 12:27 P.M., Resident #80 had swelling in her legs and was not wearing any compression hose. During interview at the time of the observation, Resident #80 stated she asked for compression hose, however had not been provided with any. During an observation on 06/03/24 at 5:04 P.M., Resident #80 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were seen by the physician as required. This affected one (Resident #80) of three residents reviewed for physician visits. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #80 revealed an admission date of 03/27/24. Diagnoses included nerve root and plexus disorder, wernicke's encephalopathy, alcohol abuse with alcohol-induced sleep disorder, insomnia, legal blindness, depression, anxiety, and iron deficiency anemia. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/02/24, revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition. Review of facility physician, physician assistant (PA), and nurse practitioner (NP) visits revealed Resident #80 was seen by the physician on 03/29/24, physician assistant on 04/05/24, and the nurse practitioner on 05/24/24 and 05/30/24. During an interview on 06/04/24 at 10:52 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) verified Resident #80 was not seen by the physician as required. The DON verified residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This had the potential to affect all but one resident (#17) who facility identified as not receiving food from the kitchen. The facility census was 86. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen on 03/25/24 at 8:50 A.M. with the Admissions Director (AD) #60 revealed Kitchen Aide (KA) #55 was not wearing a hair net while working in the kitchen. Interview with AD #60 at the same time verified KA #55 was not wearing a hairnet while working in the kitchen. Observation of the kitchen on 03/26/24 at 9:03 A.M. with Kitchen Director (KD) #56 revealed KA #54 was wearing a hairnet; however, KA #54's hair hung down and extended outside of the hair net. Interview at the same time with KD #56 verified KA #54's hair hung down and outside of the hairnet. KD #56 verified Resident #17 was the only resident who did not receive food from the kitchen. Review of the 01/01/23 facility policy titled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide a clean, sanitary, and homelike environment. This affected one (#15) resident of the three residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 86. Findings include: Record review for Resident #15, revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but not limited to, schizoaffective disorder, constipation, diabetes mellitus, and chronic back pain. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #15 revealed the resident had significant cognitive deficits and required supervision with activities of daily living (ADLs). Interview with Resident #15 on 03/25/24 at 2:00 P.M. revealed there were bugs in his room all the time. Observation at the same time revealed four roaches crawling on the floor and one roach was crawling up the wall. Resident #15 killed them all. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #66 on 03/25/24 at 2:30 P.M. reported there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the policy, the facility failed to conduct a timely post-fall investigation. This affected one (#76) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #76 revealed an admission date of 11/23/22, with diagnoses including: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute kidney failure (AKF), dementia without behavioral disturbance, and hypertension. Review of the fall risk assessment for Resident #76 dated 05/28/23 revealed resident was at risk for falls. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #76 dated 07/01/23 revealed resident was cognitively impaired and required supervision and set up help with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the nurse progress note for Resident #76 dated 07/25/23 revealed the resident had an unwitnessed fall and was found in his room lying on the floor perpendicular to his bed. Resident #76 reported he had fallen but couldn't state when the event had occurred. Resident #76 was sent to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-02-09 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on the staffing punch detail, review of the schedule, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure there was Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for eight consecutive hours, seven days each week. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 79. Findings included: Review of the staffing punch details for the two weeks prior to survey revealed there was no RN coverage on 01/28/23 and 01/29/23. Review of the schedule during the week of survey revealed there was no RN scheduled on 02/07/23. An interview was conducted with the Administrator on 02/09/23 at 12:40 P.M. She verified there was no RN working on the 01/28/23, 01/29/23, and 02/07/23. She stated when there was a need for a nurse at times the Director of Nursing (DON) would come in, but the DON did not work those days. The Administrator stated they had one full time RN and two as needed RNs on staff.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-02-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of the dishwasher manufacturer's recommendations, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a sanitary manner, dishware was properly sanitized, and food was stored to prevent contamination. This affected 77 residents who received food from the kitchen. Resident #5 and #54 received no food by mouth. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen on 02/06/23 at 11:05 A.M. revealed lunch food items were on the steam table in the kitchen next to a wire that went from the ceiling to the steam table. The wire was observed to have a fuzzy brown debris on it. There was a red fire blanket on the wall next to the stove which had brown debris on the top of it. Observation of the ceiling above the steam table revealed the ceiling to have a large circular area where the paint was visibly chipping from the ceiling. Observation of the toaster in the kitchen revealed a fan with gray debris to be sitting on top of the toaster pointing towards the steam table area. Observation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of orders for dietary products, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were not served on disposal plates. This affected 24 (#2, #6, #12, #13, #15, #16, #21, #23, #26, #28, #34, #39, #40, #41, #49, #50, #51, #60, #61, #64, #67, #68, #69 and #75) residents out of 77 residents that received meals from the facility kitchen. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Observation of tray line in the kitchen on 02/08/23 at 11:32 A.M. revealed Dietary [NAME] #77 to serve food items on Styrofoam plates for the second floor men's unit. The plates were then covered with additional Styrofoam plates and placed on the meal cart. Interview on 02/08/23 at 11:32 A.M. with Dietary [NAME] #77 and Dietary Supervisor #77 revealed the kitchen had ran out of regular plates and plate covers and had to serve the second floor men's unit their meals on Styrofoam plates with Styrofoam plates covering the top of the plates. Dietary Supervisor #77 stated the plates and plate covers were back ordered and the facility had not had enough plates to serve all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-09 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided Notice of Medicare Non Coverage (NOMNC) to inform the resident of the right to an expedited review of a services termination or Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non Coverage (SNFABN) to inform the resident of the potential liability for a non covered stay. This affected three (#24, #233, and #234) out of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Review of the Resident #24's medical record revealed an admission to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included iron deficiency anemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes mellitus without complications, spondylosis, osteoarthritis, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #24's payer source documentation revealed Resident #24 was on Medicare Part A from 11/04/22 to 11/22/22. Resident #24's payer source was changed to Medicaid on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide daily activities of daily living (ADL) in the form of hair care, hygiene, dressing, and getting out of bed for one (#27) out of 23 residents reviewed. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 12/14/21. Diagnoses included encephalopathy, gout, Alzheimer's Disease, hypertension, insomnia, dementia, and diverticulosis of intestine part. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/16/22, revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. The resident was dependent for bathing and required extensive staff assistance for hygiene, dressing, and transfers. Review of the plan of care dated 08/04/22 revealed the resident had behaviors of refusing adequate personal hygiene (bathing, changing clothing, oral care, verbal, and physical aggression towards staff during care. Interventions included anticipate and meet resident's needs. Observation on 02/06/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-09 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided activities. This affected two (#27 and #46) out of three residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 12/14/21. Diagnoses included encephalopathy, gout, Alzheimer's Disease, hypertension, insomnia, dementia, and diverticulosis of intestine part. Review of Resident #27's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 12/16/22, revealed the resident's cognition was severely impaired. Section F on MDS Activities revealed it was somewhat important to Resident #27 to have books, newspapers, and magazines to read, somewhat important to listen to music, somewhat important to do favorite activities. Review of the plan of care dated 08/04/22 revealed the resident was refusing adequate personal hygiene (bathing, changing clothing, oral care, verbal, and physical aggression towards staff during care. Interventions included anticipate and meet resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-09 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, medical record, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was served a meal to accommodate her food preference. This affected one (#14) of one resident reviewed for meal preferences and allergies. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 09/23/20. Diagnoses included asthma, schizophrenia, cerebral aneurysm, hypertension, dementia, personality disorder and insomnia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/13/22, revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident required limited assistance with one person for physical assist for eating. Review of the admission Nutritional Assessment, dated 09/29/20, revealed the resident requests excess beverages often-prune juice, cranberry juice, and Lactaid milk. The resident was obsessed with health and bowels in the past. Likes most foods however periods of changing food preferences and dislikes. The resident drinks Lactose free milk. Review of the plan of care dated 09/13/22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-06-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute kidney failure, heart failure, major depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, type two diabetes mellitus, hypertension, aphasia, and seizure disorder. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 had severe cognitive impairment with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven out of 15, required extensive physical assistance of two or more persons for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use. Review of the Morse Fall Scale for fall risk dated 02/21/19 revealed Resident #15 was at high risk for falls with a score of 60, indicated by a score of 45 or higher. Review of the comprehensive care plan revealed no evidence of a fall risk care plan. Review of the Incident Note dated 05/26/19 at 6:43 P.M. revealed the nurse documented being called to Resident #15's room by a nursing assistant, observed the resident on the floor lying on her back. The note documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to have call lights in easy reach for resident. This affected one (#80) out of 88 residents observed. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of Resident #80's records revealed an admission date of 08/10/12 with diagnoses including muscle wasting and atrophy. Review of Resident #80's minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident had severe cognitive impairment, and required extensive assistance of one person for bed mobility, transfer, locomotion, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Resident #80 required supervision eating. Review of resident's care plan revealed he was at risk for falls due to impaired balance and should have his call light in reach. Observation on 06/10/19 at 10:16 A.M. Resident #80 was in bed asking for assistance. His call light was noted draped over the wall panel approximately six feet away from resident's bed. Interview on 06/10/19 at 10:29 A.M. Licensed Practical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-06-13 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide residents access to their money on weekends. This affected three (#14, #41 and #50) out of nine residents reviewed for personal funds. The facility managed funds for 79 residents. The census was 88. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #14's records revealed an admission [DATE] and diagnoses included major depressive disorder, dementia, cerebral infarction, schizoaffective disorder, and mood disorder. Review of the minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and required assistance of one to two people for all activities of daily living (ADLs). Resident #14 authorized the facility to manage their funds. Interview on 06/10/19 at 10:16 A.M. Resident #14 stated she can't get money on weekends. 2. Review of Resident #41's medical record revealed an admission of 06/08/18 with diagnosis including encephalopathy. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-06-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident's Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) code statuses were documented on a valid form. This affected one (#6) out of 24 residents reviewed during the initial pool screening of the annual survey. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Resident #6 was admitted [DATE] with a reentry date 03/07/19. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, adult failure to thrive, dementia without behavioral disturbance, dysphagia, atherosclerotic heart disease, chronic respiratory failure, acute kidney failure, essential hypertension, bipolar disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic pain, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, and heart failure. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven out of 15, required extensive assistance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-06-13 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to notify the ombudsman and the resident of the transfer regarding the reasons for the discharges from the facility in writing. This affected three (#29, #41 and #78) out of five residents reviewed for discharge notification. The facility census was 88. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, hypokalemia, essential hypertension, hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, muscle weakness, personal history of pulmonary embolism, pressure area of sacral region, dysphagia and other abnormalities of gait. Review of Resident #41's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident to be cognitively intact and require supervision with bed mobility, eating and toileting. Resident #41 was also independent with transfers, personal hygiene and dressing on the 04/08/19 MDS. Review of Resident #41's progress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-06-13 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's discharge status was accurately coded on the Minimum Data Sets (MDS) assessment. This affected one (#89) of 21 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Record review of Resident #89's chart revealed resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses acute kidney failure, hypoxemia, other specified disorder of white blood cells, age related physical debility, unspecified fall, repeated falls, respiratory failure unspecified hypoxia, muscle weakness, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, cognitive communication deficit, hyperkalemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, other arthritis, type two diabetes mellitus, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris and elevated white blood cells count. Review of Resident #89's discharge MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-06-13 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop accurate baseline care plans for residents within 48 hours of their admission. This affected three (#41, #57 and #84) of 21 residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility census was 88. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, hypokalemia, essential hypertension, hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, muscle weakness, personal history of pulmonary embolism, pressure area of sacral region, dysphagia and other abnormalities of gait. Review of Resident #41's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident to be cognitively intact and require supervision with bed mobility, eating and toileting. Resident #41 was also independent with transfers, personal hygiene and dressing on the 04/08/19 MDS. Review of Resident #41's chart revealed resident did not have a baseline care plan in the chart.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-06-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's fall risk care plan was reviewed and revised. The facility also failed to ensure residents were allowed the opportunity to participate in care planning. This affected three (#6, #13 and #15) out of 21 residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 88. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #13's chart revealed resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses; cerebral aneurysm, psychotic disorder with hallucinations due to known physiological, alcohol dependence, hypothyroidism, essential hypertension, unspecified convulsions, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, urinary incontinence, paranoid schizophrenia, epilepsy and gastroesophageal reflux disease without esophagitis. Review of Resident #13's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident had severe cognitive impairment and required total dependence with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure fall risk interventions were implemented to prevent falls. The facility also failed to transfer a resident based on assessed transfer needs which resulted in a resident having an avoidable fall. This affected two (#13 and #15) of five residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 88. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #13's chart revealed resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses; cerebral aneurysm, psychotic disorder with hallucinations due to known physiological, alcohol dependence, hypothyroidism, essential hypertension, unspecified convulsions, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, urinary incontinence, paranoid schizophrenia, epilepsy and gastroesophageal reflux disease without esophagitis. Review of Resident #13's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident had severe cognitive impairment and required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-06-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medication ordered on an as needed (PRN) basis was not prescribed for an indefinite period of time. This affected one (#44) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of Resident #44's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including bipolar disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident # 44 had moderately impaired cognition with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15 and required extensive assistance to total dependence of two or more persons for activities of daily living. Review of Physician's Orders revealed an order written 04/22/19 for Ativan 0.5 milligrams by mouth every four hours as needed (PRN) for anxiety. There was no stop date attached to the order. Review of the Pharmacy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-06-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure documentation of a resident's hospice provider was accurate in the medical record. This affected one (#2) of 21 residents reviewed for complete and accurate medical records. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Record review of Resident #2's chart revealed resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses; type two diabetes mellitus without complications, acute hepatitis C without hepatic coma, heart failure, major depressive disorder, encounter for other specified aftercare, other chronic pain, personality disorder, opioid dependence, generalized anxiety disorder, alcohol dependence, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, cyst of epididymis and acute respiratory failure. Review of Resident #2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident was cognitively intact and required limited assistance with personal hygiene. Resident #2 also required supervision with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided with a safe and functional room. This affected one (#27) out of 24 residents reviewed. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of Resident #27's medical records revealed an admission date of 02/06/02 with diagnosis of paraplegia and hemiplegia affecting right side. Review of minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #27 required limited assistance of one person for eating and locomotion on the unit. Resident required extensive assistance of one person for bed mobility, dressing, and personal hygiene. Resident was totally dependent upon two people for transfers between surfaces and toileting. Observation on 06/10/19 at 10:22 A.M. revealed Resident #27 was lying in his bed, the particle wood headboard of the bed was completely detached and propped up against the mattress of the bed between the two exposed metal support poles that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-11-08 · tag F0729 — patternVerify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of personnel records and staffing schedules, staff interview, and review of the State of Ohio Nurse Aide Registry, the facility failed to ensure a state tested nursing assistant's (STNA) registration was not expired. This affected one (STNA #10) of three personnel files reviewed. This had the potential to affect sixteen residents (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, and #16) that STNA #10 regularly cared for. The facility census was 86. Findings include: Review of State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #10's personnel file revealed a hire date of [DATE]. Review of the State of Ohio Nurse Aide Registry revealed STNA #10 was not eligible to work in a long-term care facility due to not having work verification in the past 24 months. STNA #10's nurse aide registration expired on [DATE]. Review of the staffing schedules from [DATE] through [DATE] revealed STNA #10 worked the evening shift in the Medical Unit on [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE]. STNA #10 was scheduled to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$21,645 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $21,645 — penalty dated 2025-09-30
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-10-24 for 40 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCWE HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 01/01/2018 |
| BRECHER, LIBBY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 25% | since 01/01/2018 |
| BRECHER, MENDEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 28% | since 01/01/2018 |
| LICHTMAN, CHANA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 17% | since 01/01/2018 |
| LICHTMAN, SARA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 15% | since 01/01/2018 |
| ZIMMERMAN, JACOB | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 15% | since 01/01/2018 |
| S & T BANK | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | — | since 08/01/2017 |
| FLATEN, TABITHA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 01/01/2018 |
| SQUIRES, SUSIE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 01/01/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366209. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.