Brown Memorial Home INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 32 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 43% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 44 beds and averages 35.3 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.18 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.88 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.37 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.52 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.99 to 0.62 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to adequately monitor skin issues/bruising for residents know to have skin alterations. This affected one (Resident #17) of three residents reviewed for skin alterations. The census was 33. Findings Include:Resident #17 was initially admitted to the facility for respite care on 07/07/25. Her diagnoses were Alzheimer's disease, dementia, amnesia, visual hallucinations, chronic fatigue, nonrheumatic mitral valve insufficiency, and encounter for palliative care. Review of her minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/18/25, revealed she had a severe cognitive impairment.Review of Resident #17 progress notes, dated 12/04/25, revealed hospice shower aid came to the facility nurse and stated she noted some bruising and swelling on Resident #17's lower left extremity (LLE). It was noted there were two dark colored bruises, but there was no measurement, description or exact location of the skin alteration. Review of Resident #17's progress notes, dated 12/05/25 to 12/19/25, revealed no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-24 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure gradual dose reduction (GDR) pharmacy recommendations were completed as required. This affected one (Resident #20) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 33.Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were gastro-esophageal reflux disease, emphysema, hyperlipidemia, morbid obesity, major depressive disorder, congestive heart failure, osteoarthritis, Type II Diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, fibromyalgia, obstructive sleep apnea, hypertension, vitamin D deficiency, and history of falling. Review of her minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/14/25, revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #20's physician orders found the following medications ordered/administered and the dates in which they were initiated: Wellbutrin (antidepressant) 150 milligrams (mg) for depression, which was initiated on 03/11/24, and Citalopram (antidepressant) 10 mg, one…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-24 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to monitor the use of blood pressure medication appropriately. This affected two (Residents #11 and #5) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 33.Findings Include: 1. Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were other long term drug therapy, anxiety disorder, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, repeated falls, hyperlipidemia, orthostatic hypotension, personal history of other diseases, visual hallucinations, cardiac murmur, restless leg syndrome, osteoporosis, neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies, and Parkinson's disease. Review of her minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/06/25, revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #11's current physician orders revealed an order for Midodrine HCl (used to treat low blood pressure) oral tablet 2.5 milligrams (mg), one tablet daily for hypotension. There were parameters documented to hold the medication if the systolic blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-05-28 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure shower room exhaust fans were maintained in good and working order. This had the potential to affect all 33 residents identified by the facility as using the shower rooms. The facility census was 33. Findings include: Observation and interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 05/28/25 at 11:00 A.M. confirmed the exhaust fans in the front and back shower rooms were not working. A small amount of a mildew-like substance was present on the ceiling around the exhaust fan in the back shower room. The DON stated she was not sure if parts had been ordered to repair or replace the exhaust fans but she would check. Interview with the DON on 05/28/25 at 12:33 P.M. confirmed there were no receipts or records of parts for the shower room exhaust fans being ordered. Interview with Maintenance Supervisor #299 on 05/28/25 at 1:20 P.M. confirmed the exhaust fans in the front and back shower rooms were not working and no parts had been ordered prior to 05/28/25 to repair or replace them. This deficiency represents…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to appropriately date opened food items in the refrigerator and freezer. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all 39 residents who resided in the facility. The facility did not identify any residents with a physician ordered nothing by mouth (NPO) diet. Findings Include: Observations completed during the initial tour of the kitchen on 09/03/24 at 10:20 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #106 revealed the following items in the refrigerator had been opened and not dated: One large glass container of dill pickle spears One large plastic container of mayonnaise, 75% empty One plastic container of pimento cheese spread One large plastic container with a handle of Pace Picante salsa One bottle of Frank's Red Hot sauce One bottle of Siracha hot sauce Two small plastic containers of chicken base One small container of beef base One small jar of minced garlic One small jar of sliced jalapenos One large plastic container of sour cream One large plastic container of ham salad One large plastic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-05 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, review of the facility's beneficiary notice list and notices, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide an Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) to one resident (Resident #141) when he was discharged from Medicare part A services and remained in the facility. The deficient practice affected one resident (Resident #141) of one reviewed for beneficiary notices. The facility census was 39. Findings Include: Review of the closed record for former Resident #141 revealed an original admission date on 01/08/24, readmission dates on 04/05/24 and 06/30/24, and a discharge date on 07/13/24. Medical diagnoses included complete traumatic amputation of right midfoot, protein-calorie malnutrition, dementia with behavioral disturbance, Type II Diabetes Mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, non-pressure chronic ulcers of right and left feet, peripheral vascular disease, and osteoarthritis. Review of the facility's Beneficiary Notice-Residents discharged Within the Last Six Months revealed Resident #141 was discharged from Medicare Part A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-05 · tag F0622 — isolated
  Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review the facility failed to document a resident transfer in the medical record when Resident #23 was transferred to the hospital for a change in condition. This affected one (Resident #23) of three Residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 39. Findings include: Record review of Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 12/27/19 with pertinent diagnoses of, fracture of unspecified part of neck of left femur, benign neoplasm of cerebral meninges, pick's disease, dementia with severe mood disturbance, anxiety disorder, seizures, atrial fibrillation, major depressive disorder, mood disorder with depressive features, anxiety disorder, and insomnia. Review of the 06/07/24 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident is rarely or never understood. The resident did not use mobility devices and wandered one to three days during the look back period. The resident was dependent for eating, oral hygiene, toileting, shower, upper body and lower…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-05 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the local Ombudsman when two residents (Residents #35 and #23) were transferred out of the facility and/or discharged from the facility. The deficient practice affected two residents (Residents #35 and #23) of four reviewed for hospitalizations and discharge. The facility census was 39. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed and initial admission date on 08/08/23 and a readmission date on 04/23/24. Medical diagnoses included congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and progressive systemic sclerosis. Review of the clinical census for Resident #35 revealed the resident was hospitalized on [DATE] and 06/24/24. Review of the discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 had an unplanned discharge from the facility with return anticipated. Review of the discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-05 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, review of bed hold notices, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify two residents (Residents #35 and #23) of the number of bed hold days each resident had remaining upon being transferred to the hospital from the facility. The deficient practice affected two residents (Residents #35 and #23) of three reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility census was 39. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed and initial admission date on 08/08/23 and a readmission date on 04/23/24. Medical diagnoses included congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and progressive systemic sclerosis. Review of the clinical census for Resident #35 revealed the resident was hospitalized on [DATE] and 06/24/24. Review of the discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 had an unplanned discharge from the facility with return anticipated. Review of the discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-05 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review the facility failed to update the Preadmission Screening Resident Review (PASRR) documents when a resident received a new mental health diagnosis. This affected two (Resident #10, and #34) of four residents reviewed for PASRR. The facility census was 39. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 07/29/21 with pertinent diagnoses of, vascular dementia with mild agitation, obesity, gastroenteritis and colitis, low back pain, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, abdominal distension, hyponatremia, localized edema, major depressive disorder, seasonal allergic rhinitis, age related osteoporosis, paranoid schizophrenia, pneumocystosis, extrapyramidal and movement disorder, psychosis, hallucinations, anxiety disorder, delusional disorders, type two diabetes mellitus, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hypertension, insomnia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the 08/06/24 annual Minimum…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH