No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Aristos Nursing and Rehabilitation

4650 Rocky River Dr, Cleveland, OH 44135 · For profit - Corporation · 57 certified beds · (216) 267-5445 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (216) 267-5445 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Aug 2019
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Aug 2019
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
4367 Rocky River Dr Ste 600 · (734) 709-4689 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
17815 Puritas Ave · (216) 267-4630 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4483 Rocky River Dr · (216) 267-3883 · Call to confirm hours
Park
18093 Fairville Ave · (216) 476-4172 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.7%5.3%15.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.4%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%0.2%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%0.4%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.9%30.1%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury7.5%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.7%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.7%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.8%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.3%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.8%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.0%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine82.8%75.6%79.4%typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.33U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.61
RN hours/ resident / day
0.89
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.77
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.27
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.38
RN hoursweekends
54.3%
Total nursing turnover
54.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 57 beds and averages 51.3 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.27 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.77 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.37 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-29)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2022-11-08)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

41 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2026-05-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observation, record review, review of the facility infection control tracking and trending, review of Center of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, QSO-24-08-NH memorandum review and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) (an infection control intervention in nursing homes designed to reduce the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs) were utilized during high contact resident care) and did not ensure transmission-based precautions were utilized as ordered. This affected one resident (Resident #4) of two residents observed for EBP and affected one Resident (#24) of two residents observed for transmission-based precautions. The facility also failed to ensure a comprehensive infection control program was in place to timely identify infections and monitor the effectiveness of interventions. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 53. Findings included: 1. Review of Infection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fdisputed · IDR2026-05-13 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure an effective antibiotic stewardship program was in place that monitored antibiotic use including reducing the risk of adverse effects of the development of multidrug-resistant organisms (MRDO) from unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotic use and tracking of infections. This had the potential to affect all 53 residents residing at the facility. The facility census was 53. Findings include: Review of Infection Control Preventionist from 10/01/25 to 05/05/26 revealed the facility identified Director of Clinical/Registered Nurse (RN) #410 was the designated the infection preventionist (IP) from October 2025 to March 2026 and the Director of Nursing (DON) was designated from March 2026 to the present, 05/05/26. Review of Antibiotic Infection Summary Logs dated from October 2025 to February 2026 revealed there were no infection control logs. Interview on 05/05/26 at 4:06 P.M. with Regional Director of Clinical Services/ Registered Nurse (RN) #404 and DON verified there were no ATB/ Infection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-05-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 53. Findings include: Observation on 05/05/26 at 9:12 A.M. revealed a trail of bowel movement on the floor going into the shower room across from Residents #30 and #31's room toward the toilet and observed a soiled brief sitting on top of the trash can in the shower room. Observation of the shower room revealed the room was cluttered with a Hoyer lift and other equipment. Interview on 05/05/26 at 9:16 A.M. with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #334 verified the above findings and stated the bowel movement just happened as it appeared fresh. CNA #334 verified the shower room was cluttered but stated it was normally not like that.Observations during an environmental tour on 05/05/26 between 10:04 A.M. and 10:30 A.M. with Director of Maintenance (DOM) #401 revealed no baseboards on the wall near the nursing station and Director of Nursing (DON) office. DOM #401…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, narcotic sheet review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure controlled substances were accurately accounted for, recorded in the residents' medical records, and narcotic sheets were legible. This affected five residents (#28, #33, #34, #40, and #51) of six residents reviewed for controlled substances. The facility census was 53.Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/19/26. Diagnoses included bone cancer, right femur fracture, schizoaffective disorder, and need for personal care assistance. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #28 had intact cognition. Resident #28 required moderate assistance with bathing and toileting.Review of the care plan dated 03/23/26 revealed Resident #28 was at risk for adverse reactions related to psychotropic medications. Interventions included to administer medications as ordered. The care plan noted Resident #28 was at risk for pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure timely notification of a fall to the resident's responsible party. This affected one resident (#26) of three residents (#22, #23, and #26) reviewed for notification. The facility census was 53. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 06/17/25. Diagnoses included fusion of spine, intellectual disabilities, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and anxiety. Further review of Resident #26's medical record indicated the resident had a guardian.Review of the progress note dated 12/22/25 at 2:34 P.M. revealed the nurse was alerted that Resident #26 had an unwitnessed fall on 12/22/25 in the resident's room during an unassisted transfer. The resident was found in the seated position with her legs crossed in front of her wheelchair. The resident stated she was trying to get out of the wheelchair. Resident #26 had her hand on the floor as if she was pushing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of shower sheets, review of medical record, grievance log review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide residents, who were dependent on staff for activities of livings (ADL's), with timely fingernail care and showers as scheduled and/or per their preference. This affected three residents (#24, #26, #44) out of five residents reviewed for ADL care. The facility identified 31 residents (#1, #3, #7, #8, #9, #10, #13, #16, #17, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24, #25, #26, #27, #28, #29, #35, #36, #41, #43, #44, #46, #47, #48, #51, #52, and #53) requiring assistance with bathing and/or assistance with fingernails. The facility census was 53. Findings Include:1. Review of medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 06/17/25 and her diagnoses included intellectual disability, major depression, fusion of spine, and seizure disorder. Review of the Shower/Bath Skin Check and/or Shower/Tub Bath/Bed Bath Sheet forms from 03/01/26 to 05/06/26 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure resident weights were completed per orders and ordered notification occurred. This affected two residents (#4, and #23) of three residents reviewed for daily weights. The facility also failed to ensure medications were administered per physician orders. This affected one resident (#33) of four reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 53.Findings include: 1.Review of resident #33's medical records revealed an admission date of 11/17/25. Diagnoses included high blood pressure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #33 had intact cognition. Resident #33 required supervision with bathing. Review of care plan dated 03/23/26 revealed Resident #33 was at risk for decreased cardiac output. Interventions included administer medications as ordered and report any abnormal findings to the provider. Review of current physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were in place and a care plan was developed in a timely manner for nephrostomy care. This affected one resident (#46) of three residents (#22, #26, and #46) reviewed for appointments. The facility census was 53. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 01/21/26. Diagnoses included bladder cancer, chronic kidney disease, and artificial openings of the urinary tract. Review of the hospital after visit summary dated 01/07/26 through 01/21/26 revealed nephrostomy tube placement or exchange discharge instructions that included instructions for dressing changes, daily care, and tube flushing instructions. The after visit summary also indicated to schedule an appointment with urology as soon as possible for a visit. Review of the admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition, had an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, review of medical records and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration between the facility and the outside dialysis center. This affected two residents (#4 and #32) out of two residents that received dialysis services. The facility census was 53.Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 08/28/25 and diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, diabetes, hypertension (HTN), heart failure, and dependence of renal hemodialysis (a life-saving medical procedure that filters waste, toxins, and excess fluids from the blood when kidneys have failed, acting as an artificial kidney). Review of undated Hemodialysis Communication forms for Resident #4 from 01/01/26 to 05/06/26 revealed there were no communication forms the facility had sent dialysis and/ or that dialysis had sent back to the facility for each scheduled dialysis. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the physician had signed off orders in a timely manner. This affected one resident (#47) of three reviewed for timely physician orders. The facility census was 53.Findings include: Review of Resident #47's medical records revealed an admission date of 01/30/26. Diagnoses included right knee fracture, right knee replacement and aftercare following surgery.Review of physician order revealed orders were received on 01/30/26, however Medical Director (MD) #408 had not acknowledge Resident #47's orders until 04/08/26.Interview on 05/07/26 at 7:49 A.M. with MD #408 revealed he had seen new admission residents usually within 48 hours of admission and stated he had been at the facility at least once a week. MD #408 stated he had signed his orders manually when he was at the facility and stated he did not have electronic access at the current time.Interview on 05/07/26 at 9:56 A.M. with the [NAME] President of Operations (VPO) #603 and the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed MD #408 had electronic access, however the IT…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 31 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure as-needed (PRN) medications had a designated stop date of usage. This affected one Resident (#30) of three reviewed for as needed medications. The facility census was 53.Findings include: Review of Resident 30's medical records revealed an admission date of 03/02/26. Diagnoses included obsessive-compulsive disorder, schizoaffective disorder and depression.Review of care plan dated 03/03/26 revealed Resident #30 revealed Resident #30 was at risk for behavior/mood changes. Interventions included administer medications as ordered and attempt non-pharmacological interventions to improve sleep.Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #33 had intact cognition.Review of Resident #30's physician orders revealed the resident had an order dated 0302/26 for Hydroxyzine (an antihistamine medication used to help control anxiety) 50 milligrams (mg) every eight hours as needed for anxiety. Physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a urine culture and sensitivity (a laboratory diagnostic procedure that detects and identifies microorganisms (bacteria or yeast) in a urine sample to diagnose a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI)) was obtained per the nurse practitioner's (NP) recommendation. This affected one Resident (#46) out of three residents reviewed for laboratory services. The facility census was 53. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 01/21/26 and diagnoses included heart failure, diabetes, acute cystitis (inflammation of the bladder usually caused by infection) with hematuria (blood in urine), acute kidney failure, and malignant neoplasm of the bladder. Review of nursing note dated 03/02/26 at 4:44 A.M. and completed by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #320 revealed Resident #46 expressed concern about blood-tinged urine in her nephrostomy bag with no clots. Resident #46 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure room changes were documented in the resident's medical record. This affected two residents (#22 and #23) of three residents reviewed for room changes. The facility census was 52. Findings include:1. Review of the medical records for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 09/18/25. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease with late onset, dementia, muscle weakness, and residual schizophrenia. Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed no documented room changes. Further review of Resident #22's medical record reviewed a room change form uploaded under the miscellaneous tab of the electronic medical record dated 03/05/26 indicating Resident #22 was moving rooms due the roommate needed to be in a room by himself for safety and wellness precautions. The form also indicated Resident #22's guardian was notified and was in agreeance with the move. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 11/18/15. Diagnoses included hemiplegia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-09-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean kitchen and serve food in a sanitary manner. This affected all residents except one resident (#41) who the facility identified as received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 49. Findings include:Observation and interview on 09/22/25 between 8:16 A.M. and 8:34 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #522 revealed on the back wall where the knives hung were various dried splatters of food-like particles. The mounted, large black fan in this area had a moderate amount of dust-like particles. The back wall behind the rack with the hanging clean utensils was moderately dusty and there was a moderate amount of dust-like particles on the side of the reach in cooler next to it. In the back room of the kitchen, there was a rack of dry foods. On the bottom shelf of this rack, there were two large clear containers of flour and sugar both with blue lids. Both blue lids were dirty with debris and dried stains. Observation of the dish machine revealed a moderate amount of a tannish colored, wet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-29 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and implement baseline care plans for residents. This affected four (Residents #1, #10, #32, and #57) of 22 residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility census was 49. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 02/28/25 with diagnoses including adult failure to thrive, chronic kidney disease and diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident #1's electronic medical record and paper chart revealed there was no baseline care plan completed after admission. Interview on 09/24/25 at 10:12 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #569 verified Resident #1 did not have a baseline care plan completed after admission. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 08/07/25 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, and heart disease. Review of Resident #32's electronic medical record and paper chart revealed there was no baseline care plan completed after admission. Interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-29 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the correct servings for the pureed vegetable were provided to the residents who received a pureed diet. This affected four residents (#4, #15, #17, and #37) who the facility identified who received a pureed diet. The facility census was 49. Findings include:Review of the menu for lunch on 09/23/25 revealed for the puree diet the meal included four ounce serving of pureed carrots.Review of the scoop size sheet indicated the #16 scoop which was a blue handled scoop provided two-ounce servings. Observation on 09/23/25 at 11:50 A.M. of lunch meal service revealed Dietary [NAME] (DC) #526 served the pureed carrots using a blue handled scoop (a two-ounce scoop), giving one scoop on each plate. Observation on 09/23/25 at 12:13 P.M. of the last meal cart completed, completing the end of lunch meal service. Interview on 09/23/25 at 12:15 P.M. with DC #526 verified she used the #16 scoop providing one serving each for the pureed carrots. DC #526 verified the #16 scoop provided two-ounce servings and she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-29 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — pattern
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to effectively implement the facility smoking policy. This affected one (Resident #12) of two residents reviewed for smoking. The facility identified 16 residents who smoke. The facility census was 49. Findings include:Observation on 09/22/25 at 10:38 A.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #504 verified Resident #12 had her cigarettes on her night table. CNA #504 stated Resident #12 was an independent smoker and could have them in her possession. Interview on 09/22/25 at 11:38 A.M. with the Administrator revealed the smoking policy stated the independent smokers must keep their smoking materials locked up. Interview on 09/24/25 at 1:56 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the wrong smoking policy was presented to the State Survey Agency and provided a second policy and stated the corporate lawyer was working on a new policy. Review of the first facility policy dated 10/28/21 titled Smoking revealed independent smokers must keep their smoking materials in the red lock boxes provided and kept in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-29 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) included the resident's mental health diagnosis. This affected one (Resident #46) of two residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 49. Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #46 was admitted on [DATE] to the facility with diagnoses including schizophrenia disorder, panic disorder, and psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition. Review of Resident #46's PASARR assessment dated [DATE] revealed the PASARR did not address Resident 46's diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder. Interview with Social Service Designee (SSD) #538 on 09/23/25 at 10:29 A.M. verified Resident 46's PASARR did not address her diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder. SSD #538 stated when she arrived she filled out the PASARR. She stated she did not include a schizophrenia diagnosis because there was no proof that Resident #46 had schizophrenia. SSD #538 stated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, and interviews with staff and hospice provider, the facility failed to ensure the residents were timely assessed when new wounds were identified and failed to ensure the wounds were documented accurately in the facility's records. This affected one (Resident #1) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 49. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 02/28/25 with diagnoses including adult failure to thrive, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, contracture to bilateral knees and hips. Review of Resident #1's nursing evaluations revealed Resident #1 had a weekly skin evaluation on 07/31/25 and had no skin breakdown. There was no skin evaluation from 08/01/25 to 08/22/25. The next weekly skin evaluation was on 08/24/25. Review of the nursing progress notes for Resident #1 for 07/31/25 through 08/19/25 revealed there was no documentation as to skin breakdown to his bilateral heels or ankles. Review of the shower sheets for Resident #1 revealed Resident #1's skin was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure there were smoking assessments of the resident's capabilities and deficits to determine whether or not supervision is required. This affected two (#15 and #46) of three residents reviewed for smoking. The facility census was 49. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 10/03/24. Diagnoses included major depressive disorder, psychoactive substance abuse, throat cancer, and nicotine dependence. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 had intact cognition and used tobacco. Review of the care plan dated 05/06/25 revealed Resident #15 was at risk for injury related to smoking. Interventions included the resident was an independent smoker. There was no smoking assessment for Resident #15 in the medical record from 10/03/24 to 09/23/24. Observation on 09/22/25 at 11:31 A.M. revealed Resident #15 was outside in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-29 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy medication regimen reviews were adequately addressed and followed through in a timely manner. This affected two residents (#13 and #45) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 49. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #45 revealed an admission date of 07/09/25. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, pneumonia, non-pressure chronic ulcer of left heel and mid-foot with fat layer exposed, obesity, mild protein calorie malnutrition, and depression. Review of the Consultant Pharmacist Medication Regimen Review (MRR) dated 07/24/25 for a physician recommendation, revealed polypharmacy has been associated with an increased risk of hospital admissions. It has been associated with decreased physical and cognitive capability. High medication burden often increased the potential for drug interactions and prescribing cascades as well. The goal is to reduce medication burden, adverse effects, improved quality of life,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-29 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents were being monitoring for side effects while taking antidepressant medications. This affected one (#45) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 49. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #45 revealed an admission date of 07/09/25. Diagnoses included depression. Review of the care plan dated 07/28/25 revealed Resident #45 used antidepressant medication related to depression. Interventions included administer antidepressant medications as ordered by physician. Monitor/document side effects and effectiveness every shift. Review of the physician orders for September 2025 revealed active orders for Duloxetine HCl 60 milligram (mg) capsule delayed release particles. Give one capsule by mouth one time a day for depression. There was also an active order for Bupropion HCl ER (XL) oral tablet extended release 24-hour 300 mg. Give one tablet by mouth one time a day for depression. Resident #45's medical record did not have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-29 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure effective collaboration of care for a hospice resident. This affected one (Resident #1) of one resident reviewed for hospice services. The facility census was 49. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 02/28/25 with diagnoses including adult failure to thrive, chronic kidney disease and diabetes mellitus. Review of the hospice contract with the facility dated 06/17/25 revealed documentation would be provided to the facility including copies of clinical notes after each visit. Review of the hospice binder for Resident #1 revealed two hospice interdisciplinary group reports as well as plan of care dated 08/20/25 and 09/03/25. There was no documentation related to nurse or aide visits from 08/11/25 to 09/23/25 when Resident #1 was admitted to hospice services. Interview on 09/24/25 at 2:09 P.M. with Hospice Nurse #572 verified hospice staff came to the facility twice weekly. She stated all documentation for Resident #1 would be in his own personal binder at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary environment and the walls received timely repairs. This affected two (#42, and #45) of 28 residents reviewed for physical environment. The facility census was 49. Findings include: 1.Observation on 09/22/25 at 10:31 A.M. revealed there were dirty linens with feces on them in the corner of the closet in Resident #42's room. At this time, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #539 verified the observation. Review of the facility's undated policy titled Laundry and Bedding, Soiled revealed contaminated laundry is bagged or contained at the point of collection (i.e., location where it was used). Leak-resistant containers or bags are used for linens or textiles contaminated with blood or body substances. 2. Observation on 09/22/25 at 2:45 P.M. of Resident #45's room revealed two very large holes in the wall behind the resident's bed. The resident's bed was moved away from the wall. Resident #45 stated it had been that way for about three weeks and was told by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-16 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on personnel file review, staff timecard review, review of the state board of nursing license verification website, staff interview, and review of facility corrective action, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff providing care and services to residents had an active and unencumbered license to practice through the state authority. This had the potential to affect all 46 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 46. Findings Include: Review of Registered Nurse (RN) #500's personnel file revealed a hire date of [DATE]. Further review revealed at the time of hire, RN #500 had an active valid nursing license from the Ohio Board of Nursing (OBN). Review of the State of Ohio's elicense verification system (online system used by the public to verify license statuses of numerous healthcare professionals including registered nurses in the state Ohio) at,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to notify Resident #100's emergency contact of a significant change in condition. This affected one of three residents reviewed. The facility census was 43. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #100 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, left-side hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, bilateral hypertensive retinopathy, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, gastrointestinal reflux disease, borderline personality disorder, anxiety, depression, and nicotine dependence. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #100 was alert and oriented with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15/15. Resident #100 was her own responsible party. A family member was listed as the first emergency contact in the medical record. Review of the nurse progress note dated 09/14/23 timed 5:09 P.M. indicated Resident #100…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-11-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to serve hot and palatable foods. This had the potential to affect all residents, except two (Residents #13 and #35) identified as receiving no food by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 54. Findings include: Observation on 11/07/22 at 3:45 P.M. with Food Service Manager (FSM) #409 revealed the dinner meal consisted of chicken parmesan, noodles, green beans, salad, and red grapes. Temperatures taken prior to the start of tray line revealed that not all hot food items were above 165 degrees Fahrenheit. Temperatures taken with Dietary [NAME] (DC) #450 on 11/07/22 at 3:45 P.M. revealed the chicken parmesan was at 168 degrees Fahrenheit, noodles were at 158 degrees Fahrenheit, and the green beans were at 154 degrees Fahrenheit. This was verified by DC #450 at the time of the observation.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-08 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, resident interview, meal schedule review, and menu review the facility failed to provide a substantial snack when 16 hours elapsed between the evening meal and breakfast. This had the potential to affect 43 out of 50 residents that received meals from the kitchen. Nine (Residents #21, #33, #44, #46, #100, #101, #102, #104 and #105) who participated in intense therapy located on the substance abuse (GATE) unit received snacks regularly. Two (Residents #13 and #35) were identified as receiving no food by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 54. Findings include: Observation and interview on 11/06/22 at 4:40 P.M. with Dietary Aide #449 and [NAME] #450 revealed that snacks are made and distributed every night. Observation of the snack tray for Gate Unit revealed nine sandwiches and 12 packages of two-piece graham crackers. For the rest of the building, there was a snack tray with six peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, six deli meat sandwiches and six bags of potato chips. Dietary Aide #449 stated that she delivers the snacks every evening around 6:00 P.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach and accessible for Residents #6 and #19. This affected two (Residents #6 and #19) of 54 residents reviewed for call light placement. The facility census was 54. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including peripheral vascular disease, difficulty walking, muscle weakness, dysphagia, and severe morbid obesity. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #6 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance of activities of daily living. Review of the care plan dated 10/05/22 for Resident #6 revealed Resident #6 was a risk for falls. Interventions included to have commonly used articles within easy reach such as water, call light, remote control, and telephone. Maintain a clear pathway. Observation of Resident #6 on 11/06/22 at 9:03 A.M. revealed Resident #6 was lying in bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2019-08-29 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the faciliy failed to be administered in a manner which allowed each resident to maintain their highest level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being and to prevent the use of illegal substances/drugs on facility grounds. This had the potential to affect all 54 residents residing in the facility including Residents #49, #303, #29, #37, and #300. Findings Include: 1. On 08/25/19 at 10:30 A.M. interview with Resident #49 revealed she had been a resident in the facility for a few months. During the interview, Resident #49 shared one resident in the facility, Resident #40, had repeatedly offered to supply drugs to the other residents while she had resided here. The resident stated she had told administration about this but no one had done anything to stop it. Resident #49 stated she had come to the facility to become healthy and the resident selling drugs was making it difficult. Interview on 08/26/19 at 5:55 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #902 revealed she worked the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-08-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to initiate care plans with resident centered interventions in a timely manner after identifying resident concerns. This affected 10 residents (Resident #49, #29, #33, #251, #30, #38, #19, #32, #1, and #37) of 54 residents reviewed for care plans. Findings Include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including alcohol dependence, nicotine dependence, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart disease, bipolar disorder, and high blood pressure. The smoking care plan for Resident #49 was initiated on 08/23/19. 2. Record review revealed Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, diabetes, heart disease, major depression, nicotine dependence, COPD, substance dependence, and high blood pressure. Review of Resident #29's care plans revealed the smoking care plan was initiated on 08/06/19. A diabetes care plan was created on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-08-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop or revise care plans for Residents #29 for activities of daily living, Residents #5 and #19 for dementia care, Resident #43 for dialysis and positioning, and Resident #10 for edema. This finding affected one (Resident #29) of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living, two (Residents #5 and #19) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, one (Resident #10) of one resident reviewed for edema, and one resident (Resident #43) of one resident reviewed for dialysis and positioning. Findings Include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance, dysphagia following cerebral infarction and personal history of self-harm. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 dated 07/02/19 comprehensive assessment revealed Resident #19 exhibited moderate cognitive impairment and received psychotropic medications on a routine basis.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain dignity at all times for Resident #10, #15, and #29. This affected three residents (#10, #15 and #29) of three reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 54. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, and low back pain. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed mild cognitive impairment, and a requirement of extensive assistance with one person assistance for dressing, toileting, personal hygiene, and bathing. Observation on 08/25/19 at 12:43 P.M. of Resident #10 revealed resident sitting in a chair next to an unmade bed dressed in a hospital gown. An interview with Resident #10 at the time of the observation revealed Resident #10 was waiting for assistance to wash up and get dressed and have the bed made. Resident #10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-29 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Residents #40, #300 and #303's advance directives were available in the paper chart and/or in the electronic charting system. This affected three of five residents reviewed for advance directives. Findings include: Review on 08/25/19 of the paper chart and the electronic charts for Residents #40, #300 and #303's medical records confirmed the advance directives were not listed. On 08/25/19 at 1:15 P.M. interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #906 verified advance directives were not available in the paper chart or electronic records for Residents #40, #300 and #303.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to timely notify hospice of Resident #9's skin concerns. This finding affected one (Resident #9) of two residents observed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance, altered mental status and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #9's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited a memory problem. Review of Resident #9's physician order dated 08/27/19 to cleanse the right and left buttock with normal saline, apply zinc and cover with a border gauze dressing every shift and when soiled. Review of Resident #9's progress notes from 08/01/19 to 08/26/19 did not reveal evidence hospice was notified of the resident's skin breakdown. Observation on 08/27/19 at 9:14 A.M. with Hospice State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #907 of Resident #9's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-29 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #31's narcotic medications were not misappropriated. This finding affected one (Resident #31) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation. Findings include: Review of Resident #31's self-reported incident (SRI) investigation dated 07/30/19 indicated on 07/29/19 Registered Nurse (RN) #902 reported that a pharmacy card of 38 Percocet (pain medication) belonging to Resident #31 was removed from the narcotic drawer and the count sheet was removed from the narcotic binder. The discontinued narcotic medication had not been administered to Resident #31 since the end of May 2019. The facility was unable to locate Resident #31's Percocet pain tablets. Review of Resident #31's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 08/12/19 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, major depressive disorder and cocaine abuse. Review of Resident #31's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Record review revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease with early onset, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly MDS 3.0 dated 06/05/19 comprehensive assessment revealed Resident #5 exhibited severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #5's medication orders revealed physician's order dated 02/07/19 for aripiprozole 2 mg once a day for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and depression and a physician's order dated 05/24/19 for Cymbalta capsule delayed release 60 mg once a day for depression. Review of Resident #5's assessments revealed AIMS assessments were not completed by the facility. Interview on 08/29/19 at 8:55 A.M. with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #911 who works as a MDS Coordinator confirmed Resident #5's medical record did not include AIMS assessment for the resident's psychotropic medication use as required. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services in the areas of dressing and personal hygiene for Resident #10, #15, and #29. This affected three residents (#10, #15 and #29) of three reviewed for care and services. The facility census was 54. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, and low back pain. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed mild cognitive impairment, and a requirement of extensive assistance with one person assistance for dressing, toileting, personal hygiene, and bathing. Observation on 08/25/19 at 12:43 P.M. of Resident #10 revealed resident sitting in a chair next to an unmade bed dressed in a hospital gown. An interview with Resident #10 at the time of the observation revealed Resident #10 was waiting for assistance to wash up and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-29 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #43 was assessed and monitored for complications before and after hemodialysis treatments. This affected one (Resident #43) of one resident reviewed for hemodialysis. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of end stage renal disease, anemia in chronic kidney disease, essential primary hypertension, and type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #43 was severely cognitively impaired, totally dependent on staff for activities of daily living, and receiving dialysis. Review of Resident #43's physician orders dated 05/10/19 indicated dialysis treatment was ordered for Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, and orders dated 07/30/19 indicated a port to the right chest required daily dressing changes. Review of Resident #43's medical record revealed no pre or post dialysis assessments…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure documentation was entered into resident records regarding the care provided by the facility. This affected two residents (Resident #49 and #37) of 34 residents reviewed for documentation. The facility census was 54. Findings Include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including alcohol dependence, nicotine dependence, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart disease, bipolar disorder, and high blood pressure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 comprehensive quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #49 was cognitively intact, demonstrated no adverse behaviors, and was participating in therapy services. Review of the medical record revealed the resident was discharged from the facility but no documentation was noted as to why or where Resident #49 was transferred. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 08/28/19 at 11:00 A.M. revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2019-08-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide an adequate supply of towels for resident care. This affected all 54 of 54 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 08/25/19 at 3:54 P.M. ten towels were observed in the clean linen area. An interview with the Director of Nursing at the time of the observation verified it was the only towels available to provide resident care. Interview on 08/27/19 at 10:41 A.M. with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #908 who works as a Laundry Assistant verified there was 31 towels in stock for use in the building, and indicated there was an average of eight towels for use on the shelf with ten in dryer. Interview on 08/28/19 at 4:05 P.M. with Regional Director (RD) #909 verified there was only 31 towels available for resident care. RD #909 indicated the towels were not on the formulary, and did not get ordered last quarter. RD further verified the staff did not place an order for towels.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Investor-owned

CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as an investment firm. That’s a fact worth knowing about who ultimately profits from the home. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.

  • AAA EMINENT LLC — investment firm · 100.00% share · Direct Ownership Interest
  • AAA OPCO LLC — investment firm · 100.00% share · Direct Ownership Interest

Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
AAA EMINENT LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/31/2024
AAA OPCO LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/31/2024
CARERITE SERVICES LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
S & T BANKOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 12/12/2017
AUSCH, CHAIMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/31/2023
GELDZAHLER, YAAKOVIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/31/2023
ZSEREBROWSKI, YECHEZKELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/31/2024
EMINENT CARE GROUP LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
MERCADANTE, ASHLEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
ROYER, KIMBERLYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
ARMSTEAD PHARMACY PROVIDER SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
HOWARD, WERSHBALE & COOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
MED-NET COMPLIANCE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
BHIMANI, JAYANTILALIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
YOUNG, LYNNIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-21.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$535K
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 73%Medicare 2%Other / private 25%

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $535K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$322per resident / day
operating cost
$9,797per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$264per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366058. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next