Larchwood Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 74 beds and averages 65.8 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.88 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.11 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.62 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.14 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.24 to 0.77 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-09-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate staff assistance to prevent a fall with injury. Actual Harm occurred on 07/26/25 at 10:20 A.M. when Resident #7, who was dependent on staff for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting, fell during incontinence care when assisted by only one Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), resulting in an intracerebral contusion (closed head injury) and a dislodged jejunostomy tube (feeding tube). Resident #7 was transferred to the hospital and admitted for additional care and monitoring before returning to the facility on [DATE]. This affected one resident (#7) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 67. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 04/12/24. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, protein-calorie malnutrition, intercranial hemorrhage, Alzheimer's disease, and gastrostomy.Review of Resident #7's care plan initiated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-05-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and review of video recordings, the facility failed to monitor for changes in condition by not engaging with Resident #70 during care provided to ensure timely treatment related to a change in the resident's condition. This affected one resident (Resident #70) out of three residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 59.Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #70 revealed an admission date of [DATE] and a discharge date of [DATE]. Resident #70's diagnoses included but were not limited to cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of left middle cerebral artery, respiratory failure, type two diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, nontraumatic subarachnoid and intracerebral hemorrhage, cognitive communication deficit, tracheostomy, gastrostomy, and obstructive sleep apnea.Review of the care plan dated [DATE] for Resident #70 revealed a care plan that was incomplete, indicating the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-05-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews. record review, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure proper wound care assessments, treatment and skin monitoring was in place for Resident #70. This affected one resident (#70) of three reviewed for skin impairments. The facility census was 59.Findings include:Review of the closed medical record for Resident #70 revealed an admission date of 12/19/25 and a discharge date of 04/25/26. Resident #70's diagnoses included but were not limited to cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of left middle cerebral artery, respiratory failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, nontraumatic subarachnoid and intracerebral hemorrhage, cognitive communication deficit, tracheostomy, gastrostomy, and obstructive sleep apnea.Review of hospital after visit summary dated 12/19/26 revealed Resident #70 had a wound pressure injury to coccyx posterior with treatment to include cleanse with wound cleanser, apply calmoseptine and foam dressing.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, resident interview, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's request for assistance was responded to in a timely manner. This affected one resident (#5) of one reviewed for timely care and assistance. The facility census was 67.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and attention to tracheostomy (a surgically-created artificial airway).Review of the care plan dated 06/27/25 revealed Resident #5 had an ADL self-care performance deficit related disease process and generalized weakness with interventions that included assistance with ADLs and dressing.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 that indicated she was alert and oriented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-08 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, staff interview, facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI) review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #67 was not inappropriately restrained during resident care tasks. This affected one resident (#67) of one reviewed for physical restraints. The facility census was 67.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #67 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diffuse traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness, carrier of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (a multi-drug resistant organism), and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. Review of the care plan initiated 09/17/24 revealed Resident #67's daughter was his guardian. Resident #67 had an electronic monitoring device in use in his room, and required assistance from staff with interventions that included to assist as needed, approach the resident in a calm and gentle state, and ensure a safe environment. Review of the Minimum…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident record review, staff interview, and family interview, the facility failed to ensure mouth care was provided for a dependent resident. This affected one resident (#21) of one reviewed for mouth care. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anoxic brain damage, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and cerebral infarction. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #21 had a guardian in place. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 had a short- and long-term memory problem, severely impaired regarding tasks of daily life, impaired on both side upper and lower extremities, and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the care plan dated 08/06/25 revealed Resident #21 had an electronic monitoring device in use in his room and required assistance from staff for ADLs.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident record review, staff interviews, family interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure orders for splints were obtained per guardian preference for Resident #21, who was known to have bilateral upper extremity contractures. This affected one resident (#21) of one reviewed for positioning and mobility. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anoxic brain damage, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and cerebral infarction. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #21 had a guardian in place.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 had a short- and long-term memory problem, severely impaired regarding tasks of daily life, impaired on both side upper and lower extremities, and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs).Review of the care plan dated 08/06/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left unattended during medication administration. This affected one resident (#12) of three residents reviewed for safe storage of medications. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed she was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including diabetes, mild cognitive impairment, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #12's self-medication administration assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident did not wish to self-administer medications. Resident #12 was identified on the assessment to not be a candidate for self-administration of medications. Review of Resident #12's physician's orders revealed the resident had no physician order to self-administer medications. Observation of Resident #12 on 09/02/25 at 9:36 A.M. revealed she had several unknown pills mixed in with applesauce in a medication cup on her bedside…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a plan of care meeting was provided quarterly for Resident #25 and Resident #16. This affected two out of three residents reviewed for participation in their plan of care. The facility census wa 58. Findings include: Clinical record review revealed Resident #25 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including traumatic brain injury, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, tracheostomy, intracranial abscess, cerebral infarction, occlusion/stenosis of right middle cerebral artery, epilepsy, encephalopathy, disorder of autonomic nervous system, hearing loss, dementia with agitation, mood disorder, depression, contracture of the right knee and left hand, cognitive communication deficit, and gastronomy tube with tube feedings. Further review of Resident #25's clinical record revealed one plan of care meeting was provided on 04/23/23 during the last 12 months. There was no documentation a plan of care meeting was provided during the first, third and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene and followed infection control practices when handling soiled linen to prevent cross contamination of germs during Resident #23's tracheostomy care and suctioning procedure. This affected one out of three residents reviewed for tracheostomy care. The facility census was 58. Findings include: Clinical record review revealed Resident #23 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including traumatic brain injury , stroke, high blood pressure, anemia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, kidney disease, hyperlipidemia, depression, and respiratory failure with a tracheostomy. An observation on 03/05/24 at 9:50 A.M. of Respiratory Therapist (RT) #70 perform Resident #23's tracheostomy care and suctioning revealed a concern with performing hand hygiene and following infection control practices. RT #70 gathered the supplies for suctioning the secretions from Resident #23's tracheostomy tube. RT #70 opened the suctioning…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to accurately document an incident of maggots in Resident #42's tracheostomy in the medical record. This affected one resident (#42) out of three residents reviewed for tracheostomy care. The facility census was 58. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 12/07/22 and a readmission date of 05/25/22. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, dependence on respirator, epilepsy, major depressive disorder, glomerular disease in systemic lupus, dependence on renal dialysis, and cerebral infarction. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 had moderately impaired cognition. The resident required extensive assistance with two staff for mobility, total dependence of two staff for transfers, extensive assistance of one staff for personal hygiene, and supervision with set-up help only for eating. Review of the physician's order for August 2023 revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH