Singleton Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 47.0 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.28 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.46 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-02-27 · tag F0568 — pattern
  Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, financial record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure financial records were timely update. This affected 14 (Residents #50, #7, #8, #51, #13, #16, #21, #22, #52, #31, #35, #36, #46, and #53) of 14 resident financial records reviewed. The census was 49.Findings Include:Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were hypertension, sepsis, and paranoid schizophrenia. Review of Resident #50's minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed his cognitive status had not been completed.Review of Resident #50's resident trust account information, dated 02/27/26, revealed he had a negative balance in his account of -$970.99.Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were major depressive disorder, dementia, dysphagia, allergic rhinitis, osteoporosis, valgus deformity, slow transit constipation, disorder of thyroid, alcohol dependence, hyperlipidemia, and anemia. Review of her MDS assessment, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete and accurate. This affected one (Resident #46) of three resident records reviewed. The census was 49.Findings Include:Resident #46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were type II diabetes, hydrocephalus, spondylosis, cognitive communication deficit, vitamin D deficiency, insomnia, vascular dementia, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, alcohol abuse, atherosclerotic heart disease, alcohol abuse, and chronic kidney disease. Review of his minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/15/26, revealed he had a severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #46 progress notes found no evidence of any psychiatric evaluations or notes regarding meetings they have had in the last 12 months. There was no documentation to support his Veteran's Administration (VA) psychiatric physician was consulted or was made aware of any pharmacy recommendations regarding his…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, resident interview, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #42 was treated with respect and dignity. This affected one resident (#42) of two residents reviewed for respect and dignity. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, schizophrenia, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the care plan dated 02/14/22, revealed Resident #42 behaved in a problematic manner characterized by ineffective coping with paranoia and suspicious behaviors related to psychiatric illness. Interventions included reassuring safety and talking in a low pitch, calm voice to decrease and/or eliminate undesired behaviors and provide diversional activities. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #42 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-18 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #200's baseline care plan was completed timely. This affected one resident (#200) of two residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #200 revealed an admission date of 10/05/24 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus and malignant neoplasm of pancreas (cancer). Resident #200 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and did not return to the facility. Review of the baseline care plan in the electronic health record dated 10/07/24 revealed it was blank and had not been completed. Interview on 11/14/24 at 9:48 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #569 revealed she assisted in completing the baseline care plans. She stated Resident #200 was admitted on [DATE] and was discharged on 10/10/24. She stated she had initiated the baseline care plan, printed it out, and then began filling in the information by hand on the form with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were documented on the Kardex, failed to ensure an accurate falls risk assessment, and failed to do post fall assessments for 72 hours according to the facility policy for Resident #34. In addition, the facility failed to ensure safety of Resident #200 during care. This affected two residents (#34 and #200) of two residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 48. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including epilepsy, hypertension, bradycardia, conversion disorder with seizures, cognitive communication deficit, dementia with behaviors, schizophrenia, cardiomyopathy, congestive heart failure, and vitamin B12 deficiency. Review of Resident #34's medication orders for July 2024 through September 2024 revealed orders for Norvasc, Losartan Potassium, Metoprolol Succinate ER (antihypertensives),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were followed up on for Resident #1. This affected one resident (Residents #1) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 09/18/19 with diagnoses including arthritis, schizophrenia and insomnia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was cognitively intact. She required set up assistance for eating and oral hygiene and substantial or maximum assistance for dressing, toileting, showering and personal hygiene. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for July 2024 revealed an order for Haldol (an antipsychotic medication) 0.5 milligrams (mg) intramuscularly (IM) every six hours as needed (prn). The order began on 07/22/24 and was discontinued on 08/29/24. Review of the document titled Note to Attending Physician/Prescriber…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure fall risk assessments were documented accurately for Resident #34 who was at risk of falls. This affected one resident (Resident #34) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including epilepsy, hypertension, bradycardia, conversion disorder with seizures, cognitive communication deficit, dementia with behaviors, schizophrenia, cardiomyopathy, congestive heart failure, and vitamin B12 deficiency. Review of Resident #34's medication orders for July 2024 through September 2024 revealed orders for Norvasc, Losartan Potassium, Metoprolol Succinate ER (antihypertensives), Torsemide, hydralazine HCL, Furosemide, spironolactone (diuretics) and Depakote ER and Keppra (anti-seizure medications). Review of the fall risk assessments dated 07/05/24 and 10/02/24 for Resident #34 revealed under section G.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-05-26 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure all employees were checked against the Ohio Nurse Aide Registry (NAR) prior to or on their first day of work/hire to ensure the employee did not have a finding entered into the State nurse aide registry concerning abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of residents or misappropriation of their property as required. This had the potential to affect all 49 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the personnel file for Registered Nurse (RN) #260 revealed a hire date of 05/02/22. There was no printed evidence of RN #260 being checked against the NAR. Review of the personnel file for Housekeeper #262 revealed a hire date of 02/02/22. There was no evidence of Housekeeper #262 being checked against the NAR. Review of the personnel file for Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #218 revealed a hire date of 04/21/22. There was no printed evidence of LPN #218 being checked against the NAR. Review of the personnel file for State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #202…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-05-26 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observations, and interviews the facility administration failed to ensure its resources were effectively and efficiently managed to attain and maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of all 48 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 49. Findings include: The following concerns were identified during the annual survey: 1. Review of the medical records of Residents #26 and #31 revealed documentation Resident #24 was witnessed hitting Resident #31. Interview on 05/25/22 at 11:53 A.M. with the Administrator revealed the Director of Nursing (DON) reported the physical altercation to the Administrator on 03/26/22 by phone who received the report from Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #252 on 03/25/22 after the incident occurred. The Administrator confirmed not reporting the allegation of physical abuse to the State agency or conducting a thorough investigation as required. There were no witness statements obtained from the perpetrator, victim, or witnesses. 2. Review of facility personnel files revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-05-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, facility policy review, and review of guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices to prevent the spread of infectious diseases by failing to ensure the appropriate storage of clean linen and handling of soiled linen. This had the potential to affect all 49 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: 1. Observation on 05/23/22 at 12:23 P.M. revealed a clean linen cart with three shelves located next to room [ROOM NUMBER]. Each shelf was stocked with bed linens, incontinence pads, gowns, washcloths, and briefs. There was one sheet applied to the highest shelf which left the lower two shelves with clean linen exposed. Interview at the time of the observation with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified the clean linen cart located next to room [ROOM NUMBER] was not covered as required. Observation on 05/23/22 at 12:25 P.M. revealed a clean linen cart with three shelves located…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

What families pay in OH