Slovene Home For The Aged

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 68 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 79.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to provide food at appetizing temperatures. This had the potential to affect 189 of 196 facility residents. The facility identified seven residents (Residents #119, #120, #126, #149, #155, #166, #186) as receiving nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 196.Findings include:An observation on 08/18/25 at 08:20 A.M. of tray line revealed a test tray was prepared and placed on the food cart at 8:23 A.M. and transported by dietary staff to the [NAME] North unit where it arrived at 8:26 A.M. The test tray remained on the cart in view of the surveyor, until all other trays were distributed to residents. The test tray was removed from the cart at 8:42 A.M. by Kitchen Manager (KM) #354 who used a facility thermometer that revealed all foods were not at appetizing temperature. The waffle was 92.4 degrees Fahrenheit (F), the cream of wheat was 135.6 degrees F, and the ham was 92.4 degrees F KM #354 verified at the time of the observation that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurate and complete. This finding affected one (Resident #42) of nine resident records reviewed for accuracy. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of Resident #42's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of the breast, neoplasm of the lung and primary osteoarthritis. Review of Resident #42's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #42's physician orders revealed an order dated 02/25/25 for oxycodone instant release (IR) 5 mg (milligrams) narcotic pain medication administer one tablet every two hours as needed for shortness of breath. Review of Resident #42's medication administration records (MAR) and narcotic flow records (NFR)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to serve hot and palatable foods. This had the potential to affect all residents, except resident #54 and #56 who received no food by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 83. Findings include: Interview on 09/23/24 at 9:46 A.M. with Resident #21 revealed food from the kitchen was not good and was always served late. Interview on 09/23/24 at 9:49 A.M. with Resident #179 revealed food from the kitchen was very cold and always had to be warmed up by staff. Interview on 09/23/24 at 10:45 A.M. with Resident #47 revealed food from the kitchen was bland and had no seasoning. Interview on 09/23/24 at 12:17 P.M. with Resident #44 revealed food from the kitchen was not good and had no taste and/or flavor. Interview on 09/23/24 at 3:47 P.M. with Resident #69 revealed the taste and appearance of food from the kitchen was unappetizing. Observation on 09/23/24 at 12:36 P.M. with Kitchen Aide (KA) #602 of the lunch meal tray line revealed the meal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and facility policies, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and served under sanitary conditions. This had the potential to affect all residents, except resident #54 and #56 who received no food by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 83. Findings include: Observation and interview on 09/23/24 at 8:30 A.M. during the tour of the kitchen revealed a box of hairnets available at the entrance of the kitchen. Observation revealed Kitchen Aide (KA) #603 was observed to be without a hairnet in place while preparing the breakfast meal. KA #603 confirmed and verified she was without a hairnet. Observation and interview on 09/23/24 at 12:30 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #814 during the Westpark Unit lunch meal, revealed Resident #28's uncovered breakfast tray was on top of the microwave, adjacent to the dining room. LPN #814 confirmed and verified the findings. Observation and interview on 09/24/24 at 8:12 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #604 during tour of the three…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-26 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
  Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were served in a timely manner. This had the potential to affect all residents residing on the Westpark Unit (#1, #2, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #12, #14, #15, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24, #27, #28, #31, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, #39, #40, #41, #42, #47, #48, #50, #51, #52, #55, #56, #58, #60, #61, #67, #68, #71, #73, #74, #179, #180, #181, #182, #229), except resident #54 and #56 who received no food by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 83. Findings include: Review of the facility document titled Meal Times undated, revealed the facility served breakfast between 7:30 A.M. and 8:30 A.M., lunch between 12:15 P.M. and 1:15 P.M., and dinner between 5:15 P.M. and 6:15 P.M. Observation and interview on 09/23/24 at 12:30 P.M. with Kitchen Aide (KA) #602 of the Westpark Unit dining room, revealed the lunch meal service had not started yet and she could not start until she received help. Observation and interview on 09/23/24 at 1:06 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #814 revealed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure urinary drainage bags were covered with privacy bags. This affected one resident (#68) of three reviewed for urinary catheters. The facility census was 83. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #68 revealed an admission date of 02/03/24 with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, type two diabetes mellitus, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #68 was alert and oriented and was dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of the care plan dated 02/13/24 revealed Resident #68 required a suprapubic urinary catheter related to obstructive and reflux uropathy with interventions that included to store collection bag inside a protective dignity pouch. Review of the physician orders dated 05/01/24 revealed an order to maintain privacy bag and suprapubic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure all fall interventions were in place for one resident (Resident #51) of five residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 83. Findings Include: Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple fractures of the left sided ribs, diabetes, high blood pressure, hyperlipidemia, gastric reflux, insomnia, over active bladder, major depressive disorder, Alzheimer's, dementia without behavioral disturbance, osteoarthritis, urge incontinence and cataracts. Review of the quarterly comprehensive Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) 3.0 dated 06/30/24 revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired, needed assistance for all personal care, and had fallen once since the previous assessment dated [DATE]. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #51 had fallen on 04/03/24 when she attempted to transfer herself from her bed to her wheelchair. The resident was dependent on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure weekly weights were taken and documented per physician orders for a resident that was at risk for weight loss. This affected one resident (#68) of eight residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 83. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #68 revealed an admission date of 02/03/24 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, type two diabetes mellitus, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #68 was alert and oriented and was dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of the care plan dated 02/16/24 revealed Resident #68 was at risk nutritionally and the care plan dated 07/25/24 revealed Resident #68 had a weight loss with interventions including to monitor weights weekly as ordered and monitor weights as ordered per policy. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-05-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen area was maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. This had the potential to affect 70 of 71 residents receiving food from the kitchen (the facility identified Resident #53 as receiving no food from the facility kitchen). The facility census was 71. Findings include: Initial kitchen tour conducted on 05/16/22 between 8:35 A.M. and 8:55 A.M. revealed the following: 1. Observation of the hood suppression system above the stove area in the kitchen revealed a considerable amount of dust, dirt, and other unknown debris above the stove top area where food was prepared. 2. Observation of the walk-in freezer revealed one open box of bread left open to air. The bread was very hard and showed signs of freezer burn. 3. Observation of the walk-in cooler revealed dust, dirt, and various debris located on the floor and within the cooling fan. Fresh strawberries stored in the walk in cooler had a moderate amount of green mold. 4. Observation of the dry storage area revealed honey barbeque sauce had a label…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-05-19 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the dumpster area was maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Observation of the dumpster area on 05/16/22 between 8:45 A.M. and 9:00 A.M. revealed the following: 1. Numerous bags of garbage outside and around the dumpster. 2. Numerous loose articles on the ground including food scraps, personal protective equipment (gloves and masks) and other debris. 3. A trash cart filled with approximately ten to twelve red bio-hazard bags was noted outside the dumpster in the area directly behind the dumpster. Cook #421 verified the condition of the dumpster area in an interview on 05/19/22 at 9:00 A.M.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH