Westpark Healthcare Campus

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 42% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 86.5 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.85 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.09 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-27 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to maintain the resident environment and equipment in a safe, sanitary, and homelike manner. This affected resident #17, #29, #52, #11, #28, #46 out of 85 residents residing in the facility. The census was 85.Findings include: 1.Observation of building B on 04/23/26 with Administrator from 10:14 A.M. to 11:00 A.M. confirmed the followingResident #17 had ceiling tiles with large brown stains and brown dried liquid stains that have dripped from the ceilingResident #29 had cracks in multiple areas in the floor and yellow stains throughout the flooring and multiple tiles crackedResident #52's inside bathroom door had severe wood chipping along the entire width of the doorResident #11's bathroom ceiling tiles had water stainsResident #28's bathroom paper towel holder not fully attached to the wall and paper towels were on the toiletResident #46 had three ceiling tiles with brown water stains2nd floor dining room had water stains on the ceiling tilesBuilding B 1st floor the floor boards along hallway were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain the resident environment and equipment in a safe, sanitary, and homelike manner. This affected 29 (#2, #3, #6, #7, #8, #10, #14, #18, #20, #22, #24, #26, #28, #29, #30, #31, #51, #53, #57, #58, #59, #63, #71, #76, #77, #81, #85, #94, and #103) of 86 residents residing in the facility. The census was 86.Findings include:1. Observation of Building B during facility tour on 01/29/26 at 10:33 A.M. through 12:35 P.M., conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON), revealed the hallway outside of the dining room on the first floor had multiple unattached hand railings and missing hand railing end caps. A chair in the hallway was heavily stained and dirty. There were multiple cracks in the tiles between the dining room and nurses station estimated to 10.0 feet long by 7.0 feet wide, and the floor boards along hallway were stained and not fully attached to the wall. The second floor dining room had multiple areas of water stains on the ceiling tiles and the mechanical lift in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident family interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to develop resident-centered care plans to address all relevant physical and mental conditions. This affected two (#44 and #58) of 24 sampled residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 84.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), schizophrenia, and dementia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #58 was severely cognitively impaired and required hands-on assistance of two staff persons for completion of activities of daily living. Interview with Resident #58's family member on 01/28/26 at 2:45 P.M. revealed the resident had a history of PTSD related to multiple traumatic events, including a traumatic birth and adverse childhood experiences in her home country. The family member further stated institutional, hospital-like…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0699 — isolated
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and resident family interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was timely and accurately assessed for trauma-informed care needs. This affected one (#58) of one residents reviewed for post-traumatic stress disorder. The facility census was 84.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), schizophrenia, and dementia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #58 was severely cognitively impaired and required hands-on assistance of two staff persons for completion of activities of daily living.Interview with Resident #58's family member on 01/28/26 at 2:45 P.M. revealed the resident had a history of PTSD related to multiple traumatic events, including a traumatic birth and adverse childhood experiences in her home country. The family member further stated institutional, hospital-like…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #43's allegation of staff-to-resident physical abuse was timely reported to the State Agency. This affected one resident (#43) out of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 89.Findings include: Review of Resident #43's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/04/24 and diagnoses included cardiac arrest, schizophrenia, and cognitive communication deficit.Review of Resident #43's care plan dated 12/05/24 included Resident #43 had the potential to demonstrate verbally abusive behaviors related to poor impulse control. Resident #43 would verbalize understanding of the need to control verbally abusive behavior. Interventions included to assess Resident #43's coping skills and support system; assess Resident #43's understanding of the situation and allow time for Resident #43 to express self and feelings towards the situation.Review of Resident #43's Minimum Data Set annual…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive investigation for Resident #43's allegation of staff-to-resident physical abuse was completed. This affected one resident (#43) out of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 89.Findings include: Review of Resident #43's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/04/24 and diagnoses included cardiac arrest, schizophrenia, and cognitive communication deficit.Review of Resident #43's care plan dated 12/05/24 included Resident #43 had the potential to demonstrate verbally abusive behaviors related to poor impulse control. Resident #43 would verbalize understanding of the need to control verbally abusive behavior. Interventions included to assess Resident #43's coping skills and support system; assess Resident #43's understanding of the situation and allow time for Resident #43 to express self and feelings towards the situation.Review of Resident #43's Minimum Data Set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #43 was administered medication per physician order and that medication was accurately documented in the medical record. This affected one resident (#43) out of one resident reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 89.Findings include: Review of Resident #43's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/04/24 and diagnoses included cardiac arrest, schizophrenia, and cognitive communication deficit.Review of Resident #43's care plan dated 08/21/24 included Resident #43 had the potential for pain related to falls. Resident #43 would voice adequate relief of pain or the ability to cope with incompletely-relieved pain through the review date. Interventions included to administer analgesia medications per orders, give one-half hour before treatments or care, anticipate the need for pain relief, and respond timely to any complaint of pain.Review of Resident #43's Minimum Data Set annual assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #102's wound treatment orders were updated after a physician appointment. This affected one resident (Resident #102) out of three resident reviewed for treatment orders. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Review of Resident #102's Referral Information Form for a long term acute care facility stay from 07/16/24 through 08/12/24 included Resident #102 had a Stage IV Pressure ulcer (a full-thickness tissue loss that exposes bone, tendon, or muscle). Review of Resident #102's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/12/24 and diagnoses included other injury of unspecified body region, human immunodeficiency virus, dementia, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Resident #102 was transported to the hospital on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 09/18/24. Review of Resident #102's Weekly Wound Data Collection dated 08/13/24 included Resident #102 had a Stage IV left buttock…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #29 and #102's specimens were collected and sent to the lab timely to timely treat infections. This affected two residents (Resident's #29 and #102) out of three residents reviewed for specimen collection. The facility census was 91. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #102's Referral Information Form for a long term acute care facility stay from [DATE] through [DATE] included Resident #102 had a Stage IV Pressure ulcer. Review of Resident #102's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE] and diagnoses included other injury of unspecified body region, human immunodeficiency virus, dementia, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Resident #102 was transported to the hospital on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #102's Weekly Wound Data Collection dated [DATE] included Resident #102 had a Stage IV left buttock pressure wound and measurements…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-27 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure the smoking area was maintained in a clean and safe manner. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Observation during the tour of the smoking area located outside of Building B with Staff Aide (SA) #880 on 03/21/23 between 2:40 P.M. and 2:50 P.M. revealed a smoking area was not maintained properly. There were numerous cigarette butts located on the ground and grass-covered area, and not in the designated cans. Interview with SA #880 on 03/21/23 at 2:48 P.M. verified the condition of the smoking area. Observation during tour of the facility with the Maintenance Staff (MS) #861 and #867 on 03/22/23 between 1:00 P.M. and 1:30 P.M. revealed two trash bins with numerous cigarette butts and different types of paper products. Interview with MS #861 and #867 on 03/22/23 verified the condition of the trash bins at the time of the facility tour. Review of the facility document titled Westpark Environmental Services- General Policy undated, revealed the facility had a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $957K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH