No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Bella Terrace Rehabilitation And Nursing Center

1520 Hawthorne Avenue, Columbus, OH 43203 · For profit - Corporation · 96 certified beds · (614) 252-4931 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$166,355 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (58) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $166,355 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-26)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
181 Taylor Ave, · (614) 293-8000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
181 Taylor Ave Rm T0354 · (614) 257-2628 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1230 E Long St · (614) 252-1106 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1777 E Broad St · (614) 645-8733 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased1.4%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.1%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.2%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms46.2%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.3%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened0.6%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.5%25.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.4%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.4%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control12.5%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.6%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.3%75.6%79.4%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.16U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.24
RN hours/ resident / day
1.13
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.79
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.17
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.18
RN hoursweekends
46.4%
Total nursing turnover
71.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 84.7 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.17 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.24 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.79 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.29 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.27 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

25
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-02)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2023-08-30)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

58 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 45 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, review of the facility investigation, review of hospital records, review of police report, and policy review, the facility failed to provide the appropriate supervision for one cognitively impaired resident (Resident #46) who was at high risk for elopement and required the supervision of a secured memory care unit for his safety. Resident #46 eloped from the facility without staff knowledge on 07/05/25. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy on 07/05/25 at 11:20 A.M. when Resident #46 was taken off the secured memory care unit to go outside with the memory care unit residents who smoke. Resident #46 was brought back in the building and left unattended at the elevator in the lobby on the first floor by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #501, after being outside with the smoke group. Resident #46 was not discovered missing until 12:37 P.M. when staff could not locate the resident on the secured memory care unit. At 3:20 P.M. Resident #46's brother notified the facility the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, review of hospital records, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely treat and assess a pressure ulcer and prevent the pressure ulcer from worsening for one resident (Resident #234). Actual Harm occurred on 08/01/23 when Resident #234 was admitted to the facility with a Stage II (partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed, without slough or bruising) pressure wound to her left proximal (back) upper thigh that worsened to a Stage III (full-thickness tissue loss into subcutaneous tissue but does not go into the muscle or bone) pressure ulcer without evidence of routine skin assessments or timely treatments. This affected one resident (Resident #234) out of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 82. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #234 revealed an admission date on 08/01/23. Medical diagnoses included cardiomyopathy, morbid obesity,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-08-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, hospital record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete comprehensive blood glucose monitoring for Resident #65 to ensure insulin was administered per physician order and to meet the resident's total care needs. Actual Harm occurred when the lack of blood glucose monitoring (beginning in June 2023 and continuing through August 2023) and evaluation and/or administration of insulin resulted in ongoing episodes of hyperglycemia. On 08/12/23 Resident #65 had a blood glucose reading above 500 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) and was admitted to the hospital with hyperglycemia and acute kidney injury. This affected one resident (#65) of four residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #65 revealed an initial admission date of 06/03/22 and latest re-entry date of 08/15/23. Resident #65 had diagnoses including mild protein-calorie malnutrition, muscle wasting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe, sanitary and home-like environment. This had the potential to affect all 85 residents in the facility. Facility census was 85.Findings include:1. Observation on 12/30/25 at 12:37 P.M. of the third-floor dining cart revealed it was held together with duct tape along the edges and meals were being dispersed in polystyrene foam (disposable) containers and residents were eating with plastic utensils.Interview on 12/31/25 at 8:59 A.M. with Resident #88 shared that it was difficult to cut food with a plastic fork on the disposable containers.Interview on 01/06/26 at 9:53 A.M. with Resident #76 noted he was tired of eating on disposable plates.Interview on 01/08/26 at 8:39 A.M. with Dietary Supervisor #238 confirmed they had been using disposable plates because the boiler was being repaired.2. Observation on 12/31/25 at 9:30 A.M. in the hallway of the memory care unit revealed an approximately four foot by four foot area…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and review of work orders, the facility failed to maintain an environment free from a pest's infestation. This had potential to affect all 82 residents.Findings include:Observation on 12/30/25 at 12:26 P.M. in the first-floor dining room of multiple dead insects (a variety of insects including insects that resembled spiders and cockroaches (roaches)) along the walls near the windows.Interview on 12/31/25 at 8:59 A.M. with Resident #88 who said the roaches aren't living with us, we are living with them. She said they put roach traps around and are trying to [eradicate the cockroaches]. She said the roaches come out when the housekeeper mops. She said she sees the roaches climbing up the walls and she has fears they will fall down on her.Interview on 12/31/25 at 9:34 A.M. with Maintenance Director #258 revealed they had an issue with cockroaches, but he felt it was getting better. He said they switched [pest] companies three months ago and now he no longer had cockroaches running…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews and interview the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were followed when administering medications. This affected two (Residents # 56 and # 94) of five residents reviewed for medication administration. Facility census was 82.Findings include: 1. Review of Resident # 56's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/01/25 with diagnoses including vertebral fracture (thoracic) T11-T12, vertebral fracture (lumbar) L1, radiculopathy, idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy, low back pain and right shoulder pain, and right rotator cuff repair. Review of Resident # 56's care plans dated 05/15/25 revealed a care plan for chronic pain related to neuropathy, low back pain and thoracic and lumbar fractures; interventions include to administer medications as ordered. Review of Resident # 56's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed he was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 and he required assistance from staff with hygiene, dressing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-02 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, sanitizing instructions, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the staff were properly trained on how to check the sanitization level in the dishwasher. This had the potential to affect all 90 residents. Facility census was 90. Findings include: Review of the dishwasher chemical log from 06/01/25 through 06/22/25 revealed the chemical reading was 200 parts per million (ppm) three times a day every day. Observation on 06/23/25 at 8:20 A.M. revealed Dietary Supervisor #296 used a test strip to check the chemical reading in the dishwasher. Dietary Supervisor #296 stated the dishwasher was a low temperature and used chemicals to sanitize the dishes. Dietary Supervisor #296 was unsure if the chemical level had been checked on 06/23/25. Dietary Supervisor #296 stated the bleach container was low and needed replaced. Dietary Supervisor #296 instructed the staff to rewash the dishes that had been done that morning. The bleach container was replaced and Dietary Supervisor #296 ran the dishwasher five times and dipped a test strip each time and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-02 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's antibiotic stewardship program and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure the facility's antibiotic stewardship program was completed by a certified infection control preventionist (ICP). This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility's census was 90. Findings Include: A review of the facility's antibiotic stewardship program dated 05/01/25 to 06/30/25 revealed the monthly tracking logs, trending maps, and the antibiotic criteria forms (McGeers) being completed by the facility's Director of Nursing (DON). There was no signatures on the monthly tracking logs to reflect an ICP was monitoring the program. A review of the facility's infection control program revealed the facility's ICP is the Regional Director of Clinical Services (RDCS) #601. RDCS #601's ICP certification was received in 12/21/19. There was no ICP certification on file for the DON. An interview on 07/01/25 at 2:53 P.M. with the DON revealed the antibiotic stewardship program required monthly tracking, trending, and completion of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, work orders, policy and interview, the facility failed to ensure cool air temperatures, functional sinks, functional shower rooms, maintenance of ceilings, walls, floors, window seals and vanities, furniture, mattress, toilet paper holders, and functional hand sanitizer dispensers. This affected 24 (Resident's #24, #26, #27, #28, #32, #37, #38. #39, #40, #49, #52, #53, #56, #57, #58, #59, #60, #68, #73, #75, #76, #78, #185, and #285) of 90 residents in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of quote dated 04/22/25 from heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) company revealed cooling tower repairs due to coil froze and burst due to being shut off over the winter. The coil would need replaced for a total of $79,990. A quote dated 04/24/25 was received from the same HVAC company for temporary cooling tower, temporary pump, piping, electric, and breakers as needed for a total of $48,659.00. The work was completed and paid for sometime in May. Review of temperature logs from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, work orders, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure temperatures in the facility were at a comfortable level. This had the potential to affect all 90 residents. Facility census was 90. Finding include: Review of quote dated 04/22/25 from heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) company revealed cooling tower repairs due to coil froze and burst due to being shut off over the winter. The coil would need replaced for a total of $79,990. A quote dated 04/24/25 was received from the same HVAC company for temporary cooling tower, temporary pump, piping, electric, and breakers as needed for a total of $48,659.00. The work was completed and paid for sometime in May. Review of temperature logs from 04/28/25 to 06/12/25 revealed temperatures from 74 degrees to 82 degrees. The temperatures for resident rooms at 80 degrees or above had notation of air conditioner unit being off and/or windows open. A work order dated 06/06/25 revealed the air unit on the second floor (Blue) was not working. On 06/11/25 a work order was placed for a problem…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident representatives were invited to care conferences. This affected two residents (#56, #61) of two residents reviewed for care planning. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #56's medical record revealed a 06/01/23 admission with diagnoses including hemiplegia, hemiparesis, altered mental status, occlusion and stenosis of left carotid artery, dysphagia, cerebral infarction, chronic viral hepatitis C, major depressive disorder, contracture of right hand and hypertension. Review of the 06/01/25 Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) revealed the resident was severely impaired for daily decision making. The resident resided on the locked behavior unit. Review of the care conferences included a 06/09/25 electronic care conference entry by Social Services documented in the electronic record. There was no one listed in attendance. The nursing section was not signed by a nurse from any shift when the form indicated input from all shifts was required. The dietary section did not include oral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide barber services for Resident #38. This affected one resident (#38) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Facility census was 90. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #38 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis, depression, and adjustment disorder with anxiety. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #38 was cognitively intact. An interview on 06/23/25 at 10:59 A.M. Resident #38 stated he had not had a haircut since he was admitted to the facility, and he wanted his hair cut. Observation of Resident #38 revealed his hair was below his shoulders. An interview on 06/26/25 at 9:11 A.M. Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) verified the facility had not had a beauty shop license since 2021. LNHA verified residents could not receive haircuts or beauty salon services at the facility. The LNHA stated he was currently…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records contained accurate advance directives. This affected two residents (#39, #61) of 24 residents reviewed. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #39's medical record revealed a [DATE] admission and [DATE] readmission with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, diabetes, dementia, delusional disorders, anxiety disorder, hyperlipidemia, chronic stage three kidney disease, morbid obesity, hypertension, and atherosclerotic heart disease. Review of the paper chart revealed there was a Do-Not-Resuscitate Comfort Care (DNRCC) advanced directive (a medical order that instructs healthcare professionals to not perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) if a resident's heart or breathing stops, but to focus on providing comfort care) page. On the next page in the paper medical record, there was a signed advanced directive for a DNRCC-A (Do-Not-Resuscitate Comfort Care-Arrest, a type of Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) order that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 45 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an accurate assessment was completed for Resident #68. This affected one (Resident #68) out of 28 resident record reviews. Facility census was 90. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #68 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included encephalopathy, disseminated mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex, human immunodeficiency viruses, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, dysphagia, congenital cytomegalovirus, pressure ulcer of sacral region, dementia, and sensorineural hearing loss. The admission/readmit form dated 03/12/25 revealed Resident #68 had impaired vision, wore glasses, and was deaf. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) date 03/15/25 revealed Resident #68 had cognitive impairment, had highly impaired hearing, impaired vision, and did not wear glasses. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #68 had adequate hearing, impaired vision, and did not wear glasses. An observation on 06/23/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual the facility failed to complete a significant change MDS required for a resident admitted to hospice services. This affected one resident (Resident #2) of two residents reviewed for hospice services. The facility census was 90. Findings Include: A review of Resident #2's medical record revealed admission date 12/05/23 with the following diagnoses including but not limited to depression, high blood pressure, heart failure, anxiety, and schizoaffective disorder. Resident #2 had impaired cognition and required assistance from staff to complete activities of daily living (ADL) tasks. A review of Resident #2's physician orders revealed a revised order dated 03/13/25 to be admitted to Hospice with the diagnosis of metabolic encephalopathy. A review of Resident #2's hospice admission paperwork revealed an admission date of 01/30/25 to Hospice for metabolic encephalopathy. A review of Resident #2's completed MDS listing revealed an entry MDS was completed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure assessments were accurately completed. This affected two (Resident #5 and Residents #40 ) of twenty eight residents reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessments. The facility census was 90. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #5 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included generalized idiopathic epilepsy and epileptic syndromes, schizophrenia, hypertension, anxiety disorder, disruptive mood dysregulation disorder, repeated falls, restlessness and agitation, senile degeneration of brain and glaucoma. Review of the Annual MDS 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] for Section J1800 revealed Resident #5 did not have any falls since admission/entry or prior assessment. Review of facility fall investigations revealed Resident #5 had falls on 12/16/24, 12/21/24, 03/11/25, 03/21/25, and 03/26/25. Interview on 06/30/25 at 01:52 PM with Regional MDS #703 verified MDS did not reflect the residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) review was completed with a new psychiatric diagnosis. This affected one (Resident #61) of two residents reviewed for PASARR. The census was 90. Findings include: Review of Resident #61's medical record revealed a 02/09/23 admission with diagnoses including dementia, alcohol induced amnesic disorder, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions, psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, restlessness and agitation, anxiety disorder, post traumatic stress disorder and major depressive disorder. Review revealed the last PASARR submitted for the resident was a 01/13/24 Significant Change for the addition of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) diagnosis. Record review revealed on 08/12/24 Resident #61 had a diagnosis of psychosis not due to a substance or known pathological condition added to her list of diagnoses. Review revealed there was no evidence of a subsequent PASARR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a dental plan of care and identify triggers for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). This affected two (Resident #10 and #40) of 27 residents reviewed. The census was 90. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed a 05/21/24 admission with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes, asthma, epileptic seizures, mood disorder, dysthymic disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, major depressive disorder, malignant neoplasm of lung and bronchus, history of malignant neoplasm of pancreas, insomnia, and nicotine dependence. Review of the 05/23/25 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment revealed the resident was independent for daily decision making. Review of the residents' plans of care revealed two plans of care related to Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. A 06/23/25 plan of care revealed the resident had a past traumatic event of transportation accident (car accident/boat accident/train wreck/plane crash) related to a transportation accident.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #60, #68, and #72 had comprehensive care plans addressing preferences. This affected three (Residents #60, #68, and #72) out of 28 records reviewed. Facility census was 90. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #60 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included tracheostomy, paralysis of vocal cords and larynx, and anxiety. A care plan dated 05/24/23 revealed Resident #60 had a tracheostomy. Interventions included tracheostomy care as ordered. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #60 was cognitively intact. An interview on 06/23/25 at 1:20 P.M. Resident #60 stated he did his own tracheostomy care except for suctioning. An observation on 06/25/25 at 3:32 P.M. tracheostomy care was provided by Registered Nurse #228. The Director of Nursing was present and stated Resident #60 had been educated and provided his own…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, policy and interview, the facility failed to ensure nail care was provided to dependent residents. This affected two (Resident #61 and #78) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The census was 90. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #78 revealed a 05/01/25 admission with diagnoses including fracture of T11-T12 vertebra, protein calorie malnutrition, fracture of first lumbar vertebra, valve endocarditis, lumbosacral radiculopathy, lumbar spondylosis, muscle wasting and atrophy, difficulty walking, cognitive communication deficit, low back pain, and mood disorder Review of the 05/06/25 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment revealed the resident was independent for daily decision. The resident had no functional impairment and was in need of partial/moderate assistance with personal hygiene. Interview and observation on 06/24/25 at 12:20 P.M. with Resident #78 revealed he asked staff for fingernail clippers and did not get them. He said he had ripped off his fingernails and they were jagged. He showed that his thumb…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy and interview, the facility also failed to remove a resident's surgical staples and administer antibiotics to meet professional standards. This affected two residents (#134 and #234) out of 29 residents reviewed for appropriate care and services. Facility census was 90. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #234 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included staphylococcal arthritis right hip, osteomyelitis of vertebra, type 2 diabetes, protein-calorie malnutrition, asthma, hypertension, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. The quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #234 was cognitively intact. Review of the after visit summary (AVS) from the hospital dated 06/16/25 revealed Resident #234's surgical staples would be removed at the skilled nursing facility two weeks post operative on 06/20/25. An interview on 06/23/25 at 11:58 A.M. Resident #234 stated he recently had surgery and needed staples…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident #61 revealed a 02/09/23 admission with diagnoses including dementia, alcohol induced amnesic disorder, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions, psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, restlessness and agitation, anxiety disorder, post traumatic stress disorder and major depressive disorder. Review of the 06/01/25 Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) revealed the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making with no behaviors. She has minimal difficulty hearing with no hearing aide, had the ability to understand. Clear speech, and is understood. She had adequate vision without corrective lenses. Interview 06/24/25 at 10:34 A.M. with Resident #61 revealed she wore glasses for distance vision but had not seen an eye doctor since she was admitted to the facility. The resident indicated she wore glasses while driving and for distance vision before admission. The resident was unable to find her glasses in her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a comprehensive, resident centered treatment plan for the prevention and/or management of pressure ulcers. This affected one (Resident #68) out of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #68 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included encephalopathy, disseminated mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex, human immunodeficiency viruses, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, dysphagia, congenital cytomegalovirus, a stage III (Full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous fat may be visible but bone, tendon, or muscle are not exposed) pressure ulcer of sacral region, dementia, and sensorineural hearing loss. The nursing admit/readmit care plan dated 03/12/25 revealed Resident #68 had a pressure ulcer to the right buttock and sacrum. There was no documentation of the size or any description of the wounds. The comments revealed Resident #68…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, observation and policy review the facility failed to provide a comprehensive, resident centered fall prevention plan and failed to adequately assess residents after a fall. This affected two (Resident #5 and #135) of three residents reviewed for appropriate care and services. Facility census was 90. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #5 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included generalized idiopathic epilepsy and epileptic syndromes, schizophrenia, hypertension, anxiety disorder, disruptive mood dysregulation disorder, repeated falls, restlessness and agitation, senile degeneration of the brain and glaucoma. Review of the physicians orders dated 05/21/25 revealed a low bed with mat beside the bed was ordered. The plan of care dated 06/17/22 revealed Resident #5 was at risk for falls with an added intervention dated 05/08/25 for a low bed with a mat beside the bed (on the floor). Observations on 06/24/25 at 1:07…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview the facility failed to store respiratory equipment in a safe and sanitary manner. This affected one resident (Resident #80) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 90. Findings Include: A review of Resident #80's medical record reviewed admission date 05/30/25 with the following diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), respiratory failure, anxiety, high blood pressure, and type two diabetes. Resident #80 had intact cognition and required limited assistance from staff to complete activities of daily living (ADL) tasks. A review of Resident #80's physician orders revealed an order dated 05/31/25 for the use of a Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BIPAP- a type of non-invasive ventilation that helps people with breathing difficulties) with settings at 12/6 (the amount of inspiratory and expiratory support provided to assist with easier breathing) at bedtime as needed (PRN) and an order date 05/31/25 to Clean BIPAP mask, after use daily and PRN, with soap and water,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided with identified pain was provided with adequate pain control. This affected one resident (#78) of 29 residents reviewed for care and treatment. The facility census was 90. Findings include: Review of Resident #78's medical record revealed a 05/01/25 admission with diagnoses including fracture of T11-T12 vertebra, protein calorie malnutrition, fracture of first lumbar vertebra, valve endocarditis, lumbosacral radiculopathy, lumbar spondylosis, muscle wasting and atrophy, difficulty walking, cognitive communication deficit, idiopathic peripheral neuropathy, low back pain, mood disorder, fatty liver, intervertebral disc degeneration lumbosacral, hypertension, and irritable bowel. Review of the 05/06/25 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment revealed the resident was independent for daily decision making with no signs or symptoms of delirium and was often socially isolated. The resident had no functional impairment. He used a walker. The resident was in need of partial/moderate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, interview and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure medications were stored securely and failed to remove expired medications from the third-floor medication storage room. This affected one resident (Resident #80) of six residents reviewed for medication administration and the potential to affect 46 residents residing on the third floor. The facility census was 90. Findings Include: 1. A review of Resident #80's medical record reviewed admission date 05/30/25 with the following diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), respiratory failure, anxiety, high blood pressure, and type two diabetes. Resident #80 had intact cognition and required limited assistance from staff to complete activities of daily living (ADL) tasks. A review of Resident #80's physician orders revealed an order dated 05/31/25 for Albuterol Sulfate HFA Inhalation Aerosol Solution 108 (90 Base) MCG/ACT (Albuterol Sulfate) 2 puff inhale orally every 4 hours as needed (PRN) for wheezing and an order dated 05/31/25 for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide routine dental care. This affected one (Resident #61) of three residents reviewed for dental care. Findings include: Review of Resident #61 revealed a 02/09/23 admission with diagnoses including dementia, alcohol induced amnesic disorder, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions, psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, restlessness and agitation, anxiety disorder, post traumatic stress disorder and major depressive disorder. Review of the 01/15/25 Annual Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) revealed no dental issues. Review of the 06/01/25 Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) revealed the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making with no behaviors. She sometimes felt socially isolated. She has minimal difficulty hearing with no hearing aide. Has the ability to understand. Clear speech, and is understood. She had adequate vision without corrective lenses. She had trouble concentrating and falling asleep, feeling down, depressed or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to initiate therapy services for skilled residents. This affected two residents (#5, #285) out of two residents reviewed for rehab and restorative services. The facility's census was 90. Findings Include: 1. A review of the medical record for Resident #285 revealed admission date 06/18/25 with the following diagnoses including but not limited to aftercare following joint replacement of left hip, high blood pressure, and depression. Resident #285 had intact cognition and required limited assistance from staff to complete activities of daily living (ADL) tasks. A review of Resident #285's physician orders revealed an order dated 06/19/25 to be admitted to skilled level of care. A review of Resident #285's hospital discharge paperwork dated 06/18/25 revealed physical therapy and occupational therapy orders were recommended for Resident #285 related to left hip joint replacement. A review of Resident #285's physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility documentation review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure resident activity documentation was accurate. This affected one resident (#72) of one resident reviewed for activities. Facility census was 90. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #72 revealed an initial admission date of 06/01/25 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including periprosthetic fracture around internal prosthetic right hip joint, other mechanical complication of other internal joint prosthesis, fibromyalgia, protein-calorie malnutrition, repeated falls, major depressive disorder, chronic pain and opioid use. Review of the facility staff daily activity documentation for June 2025 revealed Resident #72 attended and was provided activities. Resident #71 was not in the facility from 06/15/25 to 06/19/25 due to hospitalization. Interview on 06/26/25 at 2:18 P.M. with Activity Director #216 verified the staff documentation was inaccurate and Resident #72 was out of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2. Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed a 05/21/24 admission with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes, asthma, epileptic seizures, mood disorder, dysthymic disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, macular degeneration, major depressive disorder, neuropathy, arthritis, malignant neoplasm of lung and bronchus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hyperlipidemia, history of malignant neoplasm of pancreas, insomnia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and nicotine dependence. On 02/15/25 at 5:01 P.M. the emergency squad arrived at the facility stating they received a 911 call from the resident due to nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. The resident's temperature was normal 98.6 degrees Fahrenheit on discharge. The resident was admitted with a diagnosis of diarrhea. The resident was readmitted to the facility 02/19/25 at 8:00 P.M. with an order for Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim Oral Tablet 800-160 milligrams (mg) (Bactrim) (antibiotic medication) by mouth two times a day for bacterial infection. There was no stop date. On 02/21/25 the order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to perform hand hygiene during medication administration. This deficient practice affected three residents (Resident #7, #26, and #42) of three residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 81. Findings Include: Observation on 11/25/24 from 8:10 A.M. to 8:35 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #381 completing morning medication administration for the third floor unit of the facility. LPN #381 prepared medications for Resident #7. LPN #381 did not wash or sanitize their hands prior to removal of the medications into the medication cup. LPN #381 then entered Resident #7's room and administered the medications, exited the room and returned to the medication cart without washing or sanitizing their hands. LPN #381 began preparing medications for administration for Resident #26 without washing or sanitizing their hands. LPN #381 then donned a gown and gloves following Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) ordered for Resident #26, entered the room and administered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-20 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, family interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely notify all resident representatives/guardians of a temporary discharge. This affected 61 residents (#83, #84, #85, #82, #87, #86, #62, #51, #55, #56, #6, #88, #29, #12, #63, #50, #73, #3, #28, #20, #75, #89, #61, #46, #90, #24, #32, #34, #35, #52, #15, #22, #23, #68, #91, #2, #76, #16, #36, #69, #39, #33, #7, #78, #60, #4, #5, #17, #13, #11, #79, #19, #14, #43, #41, #42, #8, #57, #92, #40, and #9) of 91 residents residing in the facility at the time of the emergency temporary discharge. Findings Include: Interview with Administrator on 07/30/24 at approximately 10:30 A.M. revealed the facility had an emergency which resulted in the temporary evacuation of all residents beginning on 07/22/24 around 12:30 P.M. due to the electricity to the facility being shut off. The Administrator revealed some of the resident family members/representatives were contact during that time, but the facility was not able to contact all family members/representatives until the next…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of the facility policy, staff interviews, and review of the health departments' food inspection reports, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was in a sanitary condition. This had the potential to affect all 95 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility identified one resident (#32) who received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Review of the City of Columbus Inspection Report dated 06/11/24 revealed the inspection was a standard visit. The facility received a violation for food contact services were dirty and noted there were observations of dust hanging from the vents in dish area, specifically above the clean dishes part of dishwasher. Review of the State of Ohio Food Inspection Report dated 06/26/24 revealed it was a follow up visit. The facility received a violation for the presence of insects, rodents, and other pest is not being adequately controlled or minimized. The sanitarian observed roughly 20 to 30 cockroaches of all life stages throughout the kitchen: -under three compartment/ware wash…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-01 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, family and staff interviews, review of the facility's policy, review of the State of Ohio Food Inspection Report, and record review of work orders and pest control report, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure it was reasonably free from cockroaches. This had the potential to affect all 96 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the State of Ohio Food Inspection Report dated 06/26/24 revealed it was a follow up visit. The facility received a violation for the presence of insects, rodents, and other pest is not being adequately controlled or minimized. The sanitarian observed roughly 20 to 30 cockroaches of all life stages throughout the kitchen: -under three compartment/ware wash sink-under the prep sink-around and under the cooking equipment-inside of the stand mixer cover-in the ceiling of the dish washer. Review of the City of Columbus Emergency Notice of Violation and Order to Correct dated 06/26/24 revealed the recent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff assistance received baths/showers as scheduled/requested. This affected two (Residents #68 and #73) of three residents reviewed for bathing. The census was 89. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #68 revealed Resident #68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #68's diagnoses included but were not limited to cerebral infarction, hemiplegia, neurologic neglect syndrome, dysarthria and anarthria, aphasia, dysphagia, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #68's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/02/24, revealed he was cognitively intact and required substantial/maximal assistance with baths/showers. Review of Resident #68's active shower schedule revealed he was to receive a bath or shower on Mondays and Thursdays during the day shift. Review of Resident #68's shower logs and documentation, dated 01/01/24 to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-12 · tag F0776 — isolated
    Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide radiology services as ordered for Resident #5. This affected one resident (#5) of three residents reviewed for the provision of outside/diagnostic services. The census was 90. Findings include: Review of medical record revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes and venous insufficiency. Further review of the medical record revealed the resident was transferred from the facility to the emergency room on [DATE]. Resident #5 returned to the facility with a physician order for a vascular duplex venous sonogram of the bilateral lower extremities. The order was dated 09/10/23 at 7:05 A.M. and revealed Resident #5 was scheduled to have the ultrasound at the hospital on [DATE] at 9:45 A.M. Interview on 09/12/23 at 9:33 A.M. with Resident #5 revealed the resident had gone to the emergency department over the weekend (09/09/23). Resident #5 stated an ultrasound had been scheduled to be done at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-30 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to update Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR)'s for residents with new mental health diagnoses. This affected four (Residents #50, #52, #59, and #65) of the four residents reviewed for accurate PASARRs. The facility census was 82. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #52 revealed an admission date of 07/03/21. Diagnoses included delusional disorder, mood disorder, restlessness and agitation, and encephalopathy. Review of the PASARR for Resident #52 with the file date of 08/04/21 indicated under section D that resident did not have a mental health diagnosis. Review of the care plan dated revised 07/07/23 revealed Resident #52 has a behavior problem related to threatening self harm, picks things up from around the facility and puts them in own room, makes written signs on door saying No One to Enter. Interventions include to administer medication as ordered and monitor for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to develop and/or implement care plans for five (Residents #19, #47, #66, #67, and #284) of the seven residents reviewed. The facility census was 82. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #284, revealed an admission date of 05/23/23. Diagnoses included: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation, tracheostomy status, anxiety disorder and chronic pain syndrome with a code status of full code and no known drug allergies. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13 out of 15 indicating intact cognition. This resident was assessed to require extensive assistance with one person physician assist with bed mobility and transfers, and supervision with one person assist for eating and dressing. Review of physician orders dated for 08/10/23 revealed this resident was receiving the following medication: Haloperidol 5 milligram (mg)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to revise comprehensive care plans for four (Residents #20, #66, #284, and #289) out of the five residents reviewed. The facility census was 82. 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #66, revealed an admission date of 06/07/22. Diagnoses included: fusion of the spine in the cervical region, cord compression, alcohol abuse with intoxication, nicotine dependence with cigarettes and unspecified mood affective disorder with a code status of full code with no known allergies. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 out of 15 indicating intact cognition. This resident was assessed to require supervision with one-person physical assist with bed mobility, transfers, dressing and toileting with independent with set up help only for eating. Review of the MDS also revealed this resident has a pain numeric rating score of a 07 out of a 00-10 scale…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of facility accident investigations, review of the facility incident/accident log, review of hospital records, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #30) was supervised while smoking, the facility failed to complete neurological checks following an unwitnessed fall for one resident (Resident #56), the facility failed to complete a comprehensive investigation when one resident (Resident #67) required the administration of Narcan (a medication to reverse the effects from a drug overdose), the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for one resident (Resident #47), the facility failed to reassess the effectiveness of fall interventions following multiple falls for one resident (Resident #289), and the facility failed to complete a through investigation following a fall for one resident (Resident #284). This affected six residents (Residents #30, 47, 56, 67, 284, and 289) of nine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-30 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, medical record reviews, and the facility policy, the facility failed to offer non-pharmacological interventions and/or pain descriptions prior to administration of pain medications. This affected five residents (#50, #66, #67, #71, and #289) out of the five residents receiving pain medication reviewed. The facility census was 82. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #289, revealed an admission date of 08/09/23. Diagnoses included: radiculopathy of the lumbar region, psychoactive substance abuse, chronic embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of right lower extremity with a code status of Full Code and amoxicillin allergies. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 out of 15 indicating intact cognition. This resident was assessed to require supervision with set up only for bed mobility, transfers, locomotion off and on the unit, dressing and eating. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide appropriate diagnoses or monitoring for the use of psychotropic medications for Resident #19, #47, #66, #71, and #284. This affected five residents (#19, #47, #66, #71, and #284) of seven residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 82. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 12/26/22 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dysphagia, hypertension, anemia, depression, mood disorder, visual hallucinations, osteoarthritis, and muscle weakness. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 dated 06/06/23 revealed Resident #19 had severely impaired cognition. She was noted to have delusions and no other behaviors. Review of the plan of care dated 01/12/23 revealed Resident #19 used antidepressant medication related to depression. Interventions included administering antidepressants as ordered and monitoring for adverse reactions. Review of the plan of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the physician when one resident's (Resident #6) blood sugar levels were over 400 as ordered. The facility also failed to notify the physician and resident representative of a change in condition for one resident (Resident #284). This affected two residents (Residents #6 and #284) of two reviewed for notification of changes. The facility census was 82. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date on 12/06/22. Medical diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus, obesity, hypertension (high blood pressure), anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder-recurrent. Review of the physician orders dated August 2023 revealed Resident #6 had an order to notify the physician if blood sugar (BS) was under 60 or over 400. The order was dated 01/10/23. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #6 had mildly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to timely complete and provide written transfer notices for Resident #47 and Resident #284 who were hospitalized . This affected two (Resident #47 and #284) of three residents reviewed for transfers. The facility census was 82. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 07/05/23 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, unspecified dementia, heart failure, depression, type two diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease stage three. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 had severely impaired cognition. Review of the hospital documentation dated 07/29/23 revealed Resident #47 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] and discharged on 07/30/23. Review of the transfer to the hospital form dated 08/02/23, revealed it was not completed until after Resident #47's return from the hospital. Interview on 08/23/23 at 4:30 P.M. with Regional Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide timely follow up treatment for Hepatitis C for Resident #49 and failed to ensure timely wound monitoring and care for Resident #47's leg wound. This affected two residents (#47 and #49) of four residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility census was 82. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #49 revealed an initial admission date on 02/06/21 and a readmission date on 06/18/21. Medical diagnoses included end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, and other specified abnormal findings of blood chemistry. There was not a diagnosis of viral Hepatitis C included in the diagnosis list. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #49 had intact cognition and scored 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. Resident #49 required supervision from one staff to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of physician orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review revealed the facility failed to ensure Resident #47 saw podiatry in a timely manner. This affected one resident (#47) of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 07/05/23 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, unspecified dementia, heart failure, depression, type two diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease stage three. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 had severely impaired cognition. Review of the medical record for Resident #47 revealed no evidence he had been seen by a podiatrist. Review of the podiatry list revealed the last visit was on 07/17/23 and Resident #47 was not seen. Observation on 08/21/23 at 11:16 A.M., 12:33 P.M., 1:32 P.M., and 4:41 P.M. of Resident #47 revealed he his toenails were observed to be long, extending several…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of dialysis communication forms, and review of facility policy, this facility failed to ensure post dialysis weights were obtained as per order. This affected one (Resident #15) of one residents reviewed for dialysis services. Facility census was 82. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 08/25/22. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease and neuropathy, chronic viral Hepatitis C, and end stage renal disease with dependence on renal dialysis. Review of Resident #15's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15 indicating a moderately impaired cognition for daily decision making abilities. Resident #15 was noted to be receiving dialysis services. Review of Resident #15's physician orders revealed a order for staff to log post dialysis weights every day shift on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays. Review of the medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, review of resident medical records and pharmacy recommendations revealed the facility failed to timely address pharmacy recommendations for Resident #19 and #71. This affected two residents (#19 and #71) of seven residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 82. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #71 revealed an admission date of 12/1/22 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting right dominant side, metabolic encephalopathy, dysphagia, aphasia, other psychoactive substance abuse, and anxiety. Review of the pharmacy recommendation dated 01/24/23 revealed the pharmacist recommended discontinuing the 'as needed' medication Quetiapine or reordering for a specific number of days. The physician indicated that this was something psych addressed, however, their comments were undated. Review of the pharmacy recommendation dated 02/17/23 revealed the pharmacist recommended discontinuing the 'as needed' medication Quetiapine or reordering for a specific number of days. The physician did not choose an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to monitor blood pressure consistently prior to administering medications for Resident #20 and #47 additionally they failed to monitor for side effects of medications for Resident #289. This affected three residents (#20, #47 and #289) of seven residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 82. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 06/08/21 with diagnoses including senile degeneration of brain, type one diabetes mellitus, unspecified dementia, cognitive communication deficit, epilepsy, alcohol abuse, and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed severely impaired cognition. Review of the plan of care dated 10/26/20 revealed Resident #20 had hypertension. Interventions included avoiding taking blood pressure after physical activity, educating about compliance, giving antihypertensive's as ordered and monitoring for side…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure current hospice plan of care and documentation was on site. This had the affected one resident (#20) of one resident reviewed for hospice. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 06/08/21 with diagnoses including senile degeneration of brain, type one diabetes mellitus, unspecified dementia, cognitive communication deficit, epilepsy, alcohol abuse, and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed severely impaired cognition. Review of the plan of care dated 12/02/21 revealed Resident #20 was enrolled in hospice services related to senile degeneration of the brain. Interventions included administering medications as ordered, allowing resident to discuss feelings, assisting with activity of daily living care per care plan, honoring advanced directives, and notifying hospice of changes. Interview on 08/22/23 at 3:05…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised for residents following a change in condition/status. This affected four residents (#10, #11, #23 and #32) of 14 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/10/10 with diagnoses including other specified mental disorders due to a known physiological condition, nicotine dependence, alcohol abuse, myocardial infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cognitive communication deficit, Type 1 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, epilepsy and coronary artery disease (CAD). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had mildly impaired cognition and scored an 11 of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. The resident required limited assistance with the help of one person for most activities of daily living (ADL's). The resident did not require…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to promote the dignity of Resident #20 by not removing a hospital identification bracelet upon readmission to the facility. This affected one resident (#20) of one resident reviewed for dignity. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 12/12/18 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, insomnia, major depressive disorder, anxiety and pneumonia. Review of Resident #20's nursing progress note, dated 10/07/19 at 2:15 P.M. revealed the resident was very weak and unable to stand up. A new order from the physician was obtained to send the resident to the emergency room and the resident left via squad at that time. Review of Resident #20's hospital continuity of care paperwork with a print date of 10/11/19 confirmed an admission date of 10/07/19 to the emergency room and a diagnosis of right upper clavicle abrasion. Review of Resident #20's nursing progress note, dated 10/11/19 at 11:21 A.M. revealed the resident returned to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-05 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #11's privacy was maintained while receiving care and Resident #28's room had window curtains to provide privacy. This affected two residents (#11 and #28) of two residents reviewed for privacy. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 07/27/17 with diagnoses including dementia, congestive heart failure and hypertension. Observation on 12/02/19 at 11:50 A.M. revealed Resident #11 was in her bathroom on the toilet while State Tested Nurse Assistant (STNA) #112 was in the bathroom assisting her. Neither the bathroom door nor the hallway door were closed during the observation and Resident #11 could be seen; visible from the hallway. Interview with STNA #112 on 12/02/19 at 12:02 P.M. verified she was assisting Resident #11 in the bathroom and did not shut the bathroom door nor the hallway door to promote privacy for the resident. Review of the policy titled Resident Privacy, last revised September 2019 revealed it was the policy of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized dental care plan for Resident #7. This affected one resident (#7) of three residents reviewed for dental care. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 01/26/18 with diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance, paranoid schizophrenia, major depression, pseudobulbar affect, anxiety and bipolar disorder. Review of annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had some cognitive deficits, was on regular diet, had no chewing or swallowing difficulties and no dental concerns. Review of quarterly MDS 3.0 assessment, dated 09/19/19 revealed Resident #7 had no cognitive issues and no dental concerns. Review of dental assessments dated 03/22/19 and 05/22/19 revealed Resident #7 was edentulous. Review of a dental exam note, dated 10/03/19 revealed the exam was limited due to discomfort from a bone spur to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure ordered dental treatment was provided to Resident #7. This affected one resident (#7) of three residents reviewed for dental care. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 01/26/18 with diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance, paranoid schizophrenia, major depression, pseudobulbar affect, anxiety and bipolar disorder. Review of annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had some cognitive deficits, was on regular diet, had no chewing or swallowing difficulties and no dental concerns. Review of quarterly MDS 3.0 assessment, dated 09/19/19 revealed Resident #7 had no cognitive issues and no dental concerns. Review of dental assessments dated 03/22/19 and 05/22/19 revealed Resident #7 was edentulous. Review of a dental exam note, dated 10/03/19 revealed the exam was limited due to discomfort from a bone spur to the lower gum and identified the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to timely implement a pharmacy recommendation for Resident #23 that was approved by the physician related to a psychotropic medication. This affected one resident of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: Review of Resident #23's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/28/17 with diagnoses including chronic combined systolic and diastolic congestive heart failure, pain, disorder of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, constipation, cough, headache, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), history of malignant neoplasm of breast, major depressive disorder-recurrent, anxiety disorder, insomnia, chronic kidney disease, Type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Review of Resident #23's most current annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed the resident had mild cognitive impairment and scored a nine of 15 on the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. The resident did not display any signs of depression or behaviors. The resident required extensive assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on closed record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a psychoactive medication, administered to Resident #24 was justified and ordered by the physician at the time of administration. This affected one resident (#24) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 10/29/19 with diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance, anxiety and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Resident #24 was discharged from the facility on 11/25/19. Review of the active physician's orders revealed an order to give Haloperidol one five milligram tablet by mouth every eight hours as needed. Review of the written physician order, dated 11/12/19 revealed the order for as needed Haloperidol was to be discontinued on this date. However, the order was not written to discontinue the medication. Review of Resident #24's Medication Administration Record, dated November 2019 revealed the as needed Haloperidol order was never discontinued and Resident #24 received a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$166,355 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $16,355 — penalty dated 2026-01-26
  • $63,280 — penalty dated 2026-01-26
  • $86,720 — penalty dated 2023-08-30
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-09-27 for 100 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BE SMARTS TROrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST17%since 11/27/2019
BORENSTEIN, PHILLIPIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER26%since 11/27/2019
BRAUNSTEIN, ESTHERIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST8%since 11/27/2019
BRAUNSTEIN, RACHELIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST8%since 11/27/2019
BRAUNSTEIN, SARAHIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST8%since 11/27/2019
DREIFUS, ETHANIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE10%since 11/27/2019
IKE, AKIKOIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/27/2019
WEISZ, MORDECHAIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/27/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+9.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$373K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 28%Medicare 2%Other / private 70%

This home reported $373K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$270per resident / day
operating cost
$8,217per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$298per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366207. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next