First Community Village Healthcare Ctr

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

70.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 262 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 68.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 63 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 47 beds and averages 38.0 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.06 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.89 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.80 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.22 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.95 to 0.73 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THIS IS AN INCIDENCE OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, review of facility incident report and investigative documents, resident and staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was safely transferred by a mechanical lift. This resulted in Actual Harm on 01/30/25 when staff attempted to transfer Resident #16 from the bed to his wheelchair with the mechanical lift and due to poor staff transferring techniques, Resident #16 was dropped to the floor. Resident #16 was sent to the hospital and returned to the facility with the following injuries: right knee posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) avulsion fracture, right Lateral Compression (LC) 1 pelvic ring injury, sacrum fracture, and Thoracic (T)9 distraction fracture (a fracture caused by a flexion-distraction injury during a rapid deceleration event). This affected one resident (#16) of three residents reviewed for accidents/falls. The facility census…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-07-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The following deficiency represents an incident of past non-compliance that was subsequently corrected prior to this survey. Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of the fall investigation and witness statements, review of the hospital records, and review of the manufacturer recommendations for use, the facility failed to ensure a resident was safely transferred by a mechanical lift. This resulted in Actual Harm on 03/28/23 when Resident #07 was transferred from the bed to the wheelchair with the mechanical lift when the straps to the lift pad tore and Resident #07 dropped to the floor approximately two to three feet. Resident #07 complained of coccyx and buttock pain. Subsequently, Resident #07 was sent to the local hospital where he was diagnosed with a sacral fracture. This affected one resident (#07) of one resident reviewed for accident hazards. The facility census was 34. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #07 revealed an admission date of 01/28/21. Diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-23 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide proper behavior monitoring and documented discussion of the need for psychotropic's and causes of anxiety. This affected two residents (#10 and #11) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 31. Findings include: Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/01/25 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, dysphagia, systemic sclerosis, depression, osteoarthritis, chronic heart failure, and hypertension. Review of Resident #11's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 dated 05/03/25 revealed he had intact cognition. Review of Resident #11's plan of care on 06/16/25 revealed it did not address his anxiety medication use. Review of Resident #11's mini mental score on 05/05/25 revealed no mention of anxiety concerns and no behaviors. Review of Resident #11's physician order dated 05/08/25 to 05/09/25 revealed an order for Hydroxyzine (used to help control anxiety) 25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-23 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of the medical record for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 04/16/25 with no cognitive deficits. Diagnoses included aftercare following surgery on the digestive system, malignant neoplasm colon, and intestinal obstruction, unspecified as to partial versus complete obstruction. Resident #54 discharged from the facility to home on on 04/25/25. Review of Resident #54's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] indicated Resident #54 was transferred to the hospital. After surveyor intervention it was modified on 06/17/25 to indicate Resident #54 was discharged home. Interview on 6/17/25 at 10:14 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed a corrected MDS for Resident #54 was submitted after surveyor intervention on 06/17/25 indicating Resident #54 was not discharged to the hospital as previously recorded, but was discharged home. Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete and maintain accurate resident assessments when significant changes occurred. This affected…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure dressing changes were completed as ordered by the physician. This affected one (Resident #22) out of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 31. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 04/14/22 with diagnoses including dementia, adult failure to thrive, protein-calorie malnutrition, stage three pressure ulcer of the sacral region, bed confinement status, full incontinence of urine and feces, and muscle contractures. Review of the care plan dated 07/25/22 indicated Resident #22 has a pressure injury of the sacrum related to terminal diagnoses, bed confinement, impaired cognition, and decreased functional mobility. Interventions included administering and completing preventative treatments and dressing changes as ordered, assessing and monitoring wound healing weekly and as needed, following facility policies for skin breakdown prevention and treatment, and hospice nurse oversight of routine dressing changes and wound care orders. Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-23 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide parameters for as needed pain medication. This affected one (Resident #16) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 31. Findings Include: Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included but were not limited to osteoporosis, spastic hemiplegia, morbid obesity, Type II diabetes, pneumonia, spinal stenosis, coronary atherosclerosis, chronic embolism and thrombosis, chronic kidney disease, cerebral infarction, mood disorder, peripheral vascular disease, anemia, nicotine dependence, acute kidney failure, epilepsy, insomnia, hyperlipidemia, and anxiety disorder. Review of his Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/06/25, revealed he was cognitively intact and dependent on staff for transfers. Review of Resident #16's physician orders, dated September 2024 to June 2025, revealed an order for Acetaminophen (analgesic) 325 milligrams (mg), two tablets every four hours as needed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility policy, and physician and staff interview, the facility failed to monitor the effectiveness of the pain interventions for a resident per the resident's plan of care and professional standards of practice. This affected one (Resident #35) of three residents reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 33. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 11/07/23 and discharge date [DATE]. Diagnoses included spinal cerebrospinal fluid leak, spinal fusion, and spondylolisthesis lumbosacral region. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 was cognitively intact. Review of the hospital records prior to admission revealed the resident was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] and had spinal surgery 11/01/23. Review of the hospital after visit summary (AVS) dated 11/07/23 revealed the discharge recommendation was to start taking Oxycodone (narcotic pain medication) one tablet by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-07-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, review of the tray line temperature log, and policy review, the facility failed to serve foods at the appropriate temperature. This had the potential to affect all residents who ate food in the facility. The census was 34. Findings included: Observation on 07/19/23 at 11:33 A.M. revealed Diet Tech (DT) #90 taking the temperature of foods prior to meal service. DT #90 pulled a hot dog that was ready to serve from the tray line and its temperature was 150 degrees Fahrenheit (F). DT #90 tested two other hot dogs with temperatures of 140 degrees F and 120 degrees F. After reheating the hot dogs for eight minutes, the temperature was 168 degrees F. DT #90 taking the temperature of a hamburger patty from the tray line that was ready to serve and the temperature was 158 degrees F. DT #90 took the temperature of the coleslaw which was 53 F degrees and the fruit cocktail was 57 degrees F. Interview on 07/19/23 at 11:33 A.M. with DT #90 confirmed the hotdog temperature were 120 to 160 degrees F, the hamburger was 158 degrees F, the coleslaw was 53 degrees F,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-07-24 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespread
  Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, review of the meal times, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure meals were provided timely. This affected all 34 residents who ate meals in the facility. The facility census was 34. Findings include: Observation on 07/17/23 at 12:00 P.M. revealed a sign posted by dining room revealed lunch was to be served at 11:45 A.M. There were seven residents sitting in the dining room waiting for the meal service. Observation 07/17/23 at 12:20 P.M. no residents had received lunch meal trays in the dining room or room trays. Observation on 07/17/23 at 12:24 P.M. revealed the first of four meal carts was delivered to dining room. No drinks had been served prior to the meal tray arrival. Observation on 07/17/23 at 12:34 P.M. revealed staff started serving lunch trays to the residents. Observation on 07/17/23 at 12:34 P.M. revealed Residents #09 was sitting at the dining room table and had not received a lunch tray with all the other residents. Resident #27 was sitting at a separate table and also had not received his lunch tray.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-07-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to store and serve food in a sanitary manner to prevent potential contamination. This had the potential to affect all 34 residents who eat in the facility. Findings included: 1. Observation on 07/17/23 at 9:56 A.M. revealed an undated tub of coleslaw and an uncovered and undated container of fruit in the tray line refrigerator. Interview on 07/17/23 at 9:56 A.M. with Director of Dietary Services (DDS) #87 confirmed the coleslaw and fruit were not dated and the fruit was uncovered. 2. Observation on 07/17/23 at 9:58 A.M. revealed a large tub of flour which was undated. Interview on 07/17/23 at 9:58 A.M. with DDS #87 confirmed the tub of flour was undated. 3. Observation on 07/17/23 at 10:05 A.M. revealed a tray of bread and a box of freezer burnt chicken uncovered in the walk-in freezer. Interview on 07/17/23 at 10:05 A.M. with DDS #87 confirmed the tray of bread and box of freezer burnt chicken were uncovered. 4. Observation on 07/17/23 at 10:09 A.M. revealed one full half-gallon of buttermilk and one…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, observation, staff interviews, review of the infection control logs, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure infection control logs were completed for tracking trends and patterns. This had the potential to affect all 34 residents who reside in the facility. In addition, the facility failed to follow proper infection control policies and procedures during catheter care. This affected one resident (#24) of one resident reviewed for catheter care. The facility census was 34. Findings include: 1. Review of the Infection Control Logs dated April, May, and June 2023 revealed the logs lacked tracking of the disease organism, isolation type identification, and culture dates. For months May and June 2023, there was no mapping of the house-acquired infections (HAI) or mapping of the organism in the facility. For all three months, the logs did not indicate which infections were in-house acquired infections, did not include culture dates or isolation types, and were inconsistent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-07-24 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to monitor antibiotic use appropriately as part of an antibiotic stewardship plan. This had the potential to affect all 34 residents. The facility census was 34. Findings Include: Review of documents dated April, May, and June 2023, provided by the Director of Nursing (DON), revealed there was no documentation and analysis of appropriate indications for the use of antibiotics. Interview on 07/20/23 at 2:45 P.M. with the DON confirmed the facility used McGreer's criteria for the antibiotic stewardship program. The DON had no evidence how the facility was monitoring antibiotic medications using the McGreer criteria. The DON verified there was no documentation of an antibiotic stewardship program. The DON stated she had only been in the position for approximately three weeks and had identified antibiotic stewardship as an area of improvement for the facility. Review of the facility policy, Antibiotic Stewardship Program Policies and Procedures Annual Authorization, dated 01/20/23, revealed the policy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$17,610 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $17,610 — penalty dated 2025-06-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $636K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH