Wexner Heritage House
1151 College Avenue, Columbus, OH 43209 · Non profit - Corporation · 99 certified beds · (614) 231-4900 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 3 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (71) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $47,740 in federal fines (most recent 2025-10-23)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 2.9% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 10.2% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 30.1% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.3% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.6% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 7.5% | 25.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.8% | 3.4% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.4% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 2.0% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.4% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.5% | 75.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.7% | 24.9% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.7% | 12.9% | 12.0% | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
63.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 390 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 75.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 129 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 63.1%CMS range 57.3–67.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.1%CMS range 8.7–14.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 75.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 64.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 72.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 86.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 90.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.2%CMS range 5.7–11.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.00 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 86.1 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.65 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.70 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
71 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 58 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, hospital document review, interview, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure laboratory testing and timely follow-up was completed to diagnose and treat a urinary tract infection (UTI).Actual harm occurred beginning on 12/10/25 when Resident #94 exhibited signs/symptoms of a UTI (burning) without evidence of adequate intervention. On 12/11/25 a plan for a urine culture (due to complaints of burning on urination and elevated temperature) was noted; however, the facility failed to send the urine specimen to the laboratory. On 12/16/25 (five days later) the facility recognized the urinalysis was not completed, and a urine specimen was obtained for testing. However, the results of the urinalysis were not available on 12/17/25 before Resident #94 became unresponsive, was intubated, and was transferred to the hospital where the resident was diagnosed with acute respiratory failure, septic shock likely due to bacteria in the urine, and a UTI. This affected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, hospital record review, policy review and interview the facility failed to implement a comprehensive, resident centered plan for the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers.Actual Harm occurred on 09/03/25 when Resident #86, who had resided in the facility less than 30 days, was cognitively impaired and required staff assistance with activities of daily living, was assessed to have an unstageable pressure ulcer to the sacrum with necrosis requiring debridement. Resident #86 had been admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a skin alteration to the coccyx that the facility failed to complete a comprehensive wound assessment of, failed to provide appropriate/adequate interventions for and failed to ensure the facility wound physician and wound nurse were timely notified of to prevent the deterioration of the alteration to an unstageable pressure ulcer. This affected one resident (#86) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: Review of the closed medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of wound notes, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to assess, monitor, and implement a comprehensive and individualized prevention program to prevent the development of avoidable pressure ulcers and failed to ensure adequate interventions were in place to prevent new pressure injuries for Resident #61. Additionally, the facility failed to comprehensively assess, monitor and implement a treatment for Resident #80's unstageable (full-thickness skin and muscle loss, with slough or eschar obstructing the wound bed making it impossible to determine the true depth of the ulcer.) pressure ulcer on admission to the facility for more than two days. Actual harm occurred on 11/02/24 when Resident #61 who utilized a wheelchair and was dependent on staff for bed mobility developed an unstageable pressure ulcer to the left heel as a result of propelling himself in his wheelchair with no shoes on and/or no off-loading of the left heel while in bed. The facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the dishwasher and three compartment sink was in a working order. Additionally, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a sanitary manner and store and prepare foods in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect 83 out of 85 residents residing in the facility with two residents on a nothing by mouth (NPO) diet. the facility census was 85.During observation of the kitchen area on 12/15/25 at approximately 9:40 A.M. with Regional Dietary Manager (RDM) #601, upon entering the kitchen and performing hand hygiene, the surveyor observed the paper towel dispenser at the handwashing sink was broken and nonfunctional. RDM #601 confirmed at 9:40 A.M. that the dispenser had been broken for awhile and that maintenance had not repaired it. The surveyor was required to obtain napkins from a back storage area to dry hands.During the same observation, the surveyor observed the front kitchen area near the dishwasher and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Mantoux Tuberculosis (TB) testing and annual assessments were completed in a timely manner which had the potential to affect all 85 residents residing in the facility. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was replaced after the nasal cannula fell on the ground for Resident #105, and failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were followed during medication administration via a gastrostomy feeding tube for Resident #44. The facility census was 85.1. Review of the personnel file for Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #141 revealed a hire date of 07/08/25, however, there was no documentation verifying whether the staff actually began providing resident care on or after this date. Review of the initial first step for the Mantoux Tuberculosis (TB) test was administered on 07/08/25 but was not read until 07/10/25, occurring after the staff member's date of hire Review of the personnel file for LPN #350 revealed a hire date of 05/16/25, however,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to follow physician orders related to obtaining daily weights. This affected Resident #01 and #10 out of five residents ordered to receive daily weights. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure that physician orders for double portions were followed, which affected Resident #18. The facility also failed to obtain a timely self-medication administration assessment for Resident #01 who was receiving tube feeding. The facility census was 85. 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 06/03/25 with diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy, type one diabetes mellitus, cognitive communication deficit, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and obesity. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed 12/08/25 revealed Resident #18 is cognitively intact, independent with eating, and has not had a weight gain or loss in the past month. Review of care plan dated 06/10/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure foods were at a palatable temperature. This had the potential to affect 83 out of 85 residents in the facility with two residents receiving a nothing by mouth (NPO) diet. The facility census was 85. During interview on 12/16/2025 at 2:12 P.M., Resident #30, stated that the food was terrible, arrived cold, and lacked flavor. Review of additional interviews conducted during the survey revealed that multiple residents reported concerns regarding food being served cold.During observation related to tray service on 12/18/2025, a test tray was not observed on the meal cart at 1:18 P.M. Staff stated that the test tray was not present because it had been left in the kitchen. At 1:23 P.M., staff confirmed that the test tray had been sitting in the kitchen for approximately 15 minutes after being prepared and was not placed on the meal cart prior to service. The temperatures of the lunch items were around 60-80 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and the items were not tasted at that point.During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-29 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure purred foods were at the appropriate consistency which had the potential to affect Residents #1, #2, #96, #53, #64 who received a pureed diet. The facility census was 85. During observation on 12/18/2025 at 11:26 A.M., the surveyor observed the pureed food preparation process with [NAME] #600. The surveyor observed the fish item intended for residents on a pureed diet and noted the consistency was stringy and not smooth. The fish was described as having separable strands when processed with broth, and the surveyor observed that the texture was not appropriate for residents prescribed a pureed diet. [NAME] #600 stated she was attempting to remove the fish item from the pureed menu due to it not pureeing correctly and further stated that residents did not like the consistency and confirmed the consistency was not correct, however, she confirmed that the item would continue to be served.Review from the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI), Level 4 foods, which are considered pureed, must…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to maintain safe and comfortable temperatures in Resident #36's room. This affected one (#36) of three residents reviewed for environment. The census was 85. Review of Resident #36's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/03/24. Diagnoses include type II diabetes mellitus with other specified complication, morbid obesity, unsteadiness on feet, need for assistance with personal care, lymphedema, essential (primary) hypertension, muscle weakness, chronic pain syndrome, bilateral primary osteoarthritis of hip, low back pain, and left bundle branch block.Review of Resident #36's Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact.Observation on 12/15/25 at 2:20 P. M of Yazz 4 hallway revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) wearing winter coat in hallway.Observation on 12/15/25 at 2:24 P.M. reveals maintenance in Resident #36's room regarding heater.Interview on 12/15/25 at 2:35 P.M. with Resident #36 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-29 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a baseline abnormal involuntary movement scale (AIMS) scale for one resident (#12) who was admitted on psychotic medication. This affected one resident (#12) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 85. Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an initial admission date of 08/22/25 with the diagnoses including but not limited to bipolar disorder, catatonic disorder, dementia with behavioral disturbances, protein calorie malnutrition, hypertension, hypothyroidism, depression, spinal stenosis, anemia, hyperlipidemia, urge incontinence, insomnia, voice and resonance disorder, constipation, adult failure to thrive and intra-abdominal and pelvic swelling, mass and lump.Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had no cognitive deficit. Review of the mood and behavior revealed the resident had indicators…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure routine shaving was provided for Resident #12, who was dependent on staff. This affected one resident (#12) of five residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 85. Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an initial admission date of 08/22/25 with the diagnoses including but not limited to bipolar disorder, catatonic disorder, dementia with behavioral disturbances, protein calorie malnutrition, hypertension, hypothyroidism, depression, spinal stenosis, anemia, hyperlipidemia, urge incontinence, insomnia, voice and resonance disorder, constipation, adult failure to thrive and intra-abdominal and pelvic swelling, mass and lump.Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had no cognitive deficit. Review of the mood and behavior revealed the resident had indicators of depression and displayed no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, and staff interview this facility failed to ensure prescribed splint orders were transcribed and implemented correctly. This affected one (Resident #75) of the two residents reviewed for splints. The facility census was 85. Review of the medical record for Resident #75 revealed an admission date of 06/02/2025. Diagnoses included cerebral palsy, contracture of the right and left hand, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #75's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed this resident experienced long and short-term memory problems with a severely impaired cognition for daily decision-making abilities. Review of the plan of care dated 07/07/25 revealed Resident #75 was at risk for or prone to the development of contractures. Interventions included to provide Resident #75 with gentle range of motion (ROM) to affected joint as tolerated when proving daily care, application of a Royan Hand Brace apply brace to right hand in the morning, take off at night…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent resident falls for Residents #20 and #94. This effected two of three residents reviewed for falls with injuries. The facility census was 85.1. Review of the medical of Resident #20 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of osteoarthritis, muscle weakness, and history of falls. The resident's care plan dated 12/08/25 indicated she was at increased risk for falls. Interventions included maintaining the call light within reach.A review of the fall incident on 09/26/25 revealed the resident was found on the floor face down in her room between 4:00 A.M and 5:00 A.M. The nursing assessment noted injuries including a laceration to the left lower leg, edema to the head and eye, and pain upon touch. The resident was sent to the emergency room for evaluation and returned later that day with sutures to the left lower leg. After the fall, the interdisciplinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 58 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to label oxygen tubing for Resident #09, #14, and #44. This affected three of five residents reviewed for respiratory care. The census was 85. 1. Record review of Resident #09's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/31/24. Diagnoses include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, dependence on supplemental oxygen, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and type II diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy. Review of Resident #09's Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 09, indicating moderately impaired cognition and that Resident #09 required oxygen therapy. Review of Resident #09's care plan dated 12/02/25 revealed Resident #09 is prone to cardio-pulmonary complications related to acute on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-29 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered daily weights were collected timely, this affected one (#54) of residents reviewed for physician orders. The facility census was 85.Review of the medical record for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 11/18/25 with diagnoses of hypocalcemia, cognitive communication deficit, atrial fibrillation, muscle weakness, chronic combined systolic and diastolic heart failure, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery with angina, hyperlipidemia, and pulmonary embolism.Review of admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #54 is cognitively intact, has active heart and circulation diagnoses of atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, heart failure, and hypertension, and is currently taking an antiplatelet and anticoagulant.Review of care plan dated 11/24/25 revealed the resident has a nutritional problem or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-29 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure physician parameters were appropriately followed. This affected three (#04, #08, and #75) of six residents selected for medication regimen review. The facility census was 85. 1. Record review of Resident #04 revealed an admission date of 10/31/25 and readmission of 11/25/25. Diagnoses included but are not limited to osteomyelitis of vertebra, discitis, low back pain, complication of internal fixation device of vertebrae, bipolar disorder, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), depression, gout and chronic pain. Further review of Resident #04 record revealed an order for Hydrocodone-acetaminophen oral tablet 5-325 milligrams (mg), start date 11/25/25, with direction to give two tablets by mouth every four hours as needed for pain, and a second order for Hydrocodone-acetaminophen oral table 5-325 mg, with a start date of 11/25/25, with directions to give one tablet by mouth every four hours as needed for pain. Interview with Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of manufacturer guidelines, and facility policy review the facility failed to remove expired Tubersol tuberculin solution from circulation. This deficient practice had the potential to affect new resident admissions. The facility census was 85.An observation on [DATE] at 9:51 A.M. revealed in the medication storage refrigerator located at the nurses' desk on the first hallway. Inside the refrigerator was an open half-used vial of Tubersol tuberculin solution not labeled with an open date on the storage box or on the vial. Further observation revealed another open half used vial of Tubersol tuberculin solution with an open date [DATE] located on the vial. Both vials of the Tubersol tuberculin solution had an expiration date of 10/2026.A review of the manufacture guidelines for Tubersol tuberculin solution dated 10/2021 revealed a vial of Tubersol which has been entered and in use for 30 days should be discarded. Do not use after expiration date.A review of the facility's policy titled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-29 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered urine screenings were collected timely, this affected two (Resident #36 and Resident #94) out of six reviewed for physician ordered lab results. The facility census was 85. 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 12/03/24 with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus, depression, chronic pain syndrome, constipation, anxiety and arthritis.Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #36 is cognitively intact, dependent on staff for personal hygiene and toilet transfers, and requires substantial to maximal assistance with bed mobility.Review of care plan dated 12/03/25 revealed Resident #36 is prone to alterations in bowel and bladder function related to impaired strength and endurance, generalized weakness, unsteadiness on feet, right femur fracture/surgery, anemia, constipation, and diuretic use. Interventions include…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-29 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed ensure one resident had a physician's order for labs obtained. This affected one resident (#12) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 85.Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an initial admission date of 08/22/25 with the diagnoses including but not limited to bipolar disorder, catatonic disorder, dementia with behavioral disturbances, protein calorie malnutrition, hypertension, hypothyroidism, depression, spinal stenosis, anemia, hyperlipidemia, urge incontinence, insomnia, voice and resonance disorder, constipation, adult failure to thrive and intra-abdominal and pelvic swelling, mass and lump.Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had no cognitive deficit.Review of the resident's current physician's orders for December 2025 identified orders dated 08/22/25 lipid panel every 12 months and 09/11/15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-29 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure antibiotic stewardship was followed. This affected one (Resident #36) out of four residents reviewed for antibiotic usage. The facility census was 85. Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 12/03/24 with diagnoses of type two diabetes mellitus, depression, chronic pain syndrome, constipation, anxiety and arthritis.Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #36 is cognitively intact, dependent on staff for personal hygiene and toilet transfers, and requires substantial to maximal assistance with bed mobility.Review of care plan dated 12/03/25 revealed Resident #36 is prone to alterations in bowel and bladder function related to impaired strength and endurance, generalized weakness, unsteadiness on feet, right femur fracture/surgery, anemia, constipation, and diuretic use. Interventions include assisting with toileting and hygiene, monitoring urine, and obtaining…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete incontinence care appropriately. This affected one resident (Resident #33) observed for incontinence care. The facility census was 76.Findings include:Review of Resident #51's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included severe protein malnutrition, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), acute kidney disease (AKD) and history of falling. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed her cognition was severely impaired. She required supervision or touching assistance for eating, was dependent on oral hygiene, toileting, bathing/showering, dressing, personal hygiene and turning and repositioning. Resident #51 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. No falls and no pressure areas were coded on the MDS. On 10/29/25 at 10:35 A.M. observation of incontinence care provided to Resident #51 revealed certified nursing assistant (CNA) #137…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to maintain infection control practices by failing to perform hand hygiene during meal tray service. This affected three of three (Resident #39, #40 and #43) residents observed during meal service. This had the potential to affect all thirteen residents residing on the Yass 2 unit. The facility census was 76.Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #39's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/07/24. Diagnoses include unspecified dementia, Type II Diabetes Mellitus with chronic kidney disease, Crohn's disease, colostomy status, chronic kidney disease stage III, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure, chronic diastolic heart failure, repeated falls and cognitive communicative deficit.Review of Resident #39's Minimum Data Set 3.0 dated 08/12/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating the resident was cognitively intact.Observation on 10/29/25 at 12:15 P.M. revealed during tray service certified nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, self-reported incident review, facility investigation review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation regarding an alleged sexual assault of Resident #85. This affected one (Resident #85) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 84. Findings Include: Review of the closed medical record revealed Resident #85 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included a urinary tract infection, Parkinson ' s disease, fibromyalgia, and dystonia. The resident was discharged on 09/05/25.The hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed Resident #85 had a fall and was treated for a urinary tract infection. An admission summary dated [DATE] at 9:00 P.M. revealed Resident #85 had a hematoma to the left lateral scalp, bruising to the right arm, bruising to the left hip, and bruising to the back of the left shoulder. Review of the progress notes dated 09/03/25 and 09/04/25 revealed no evidence of Resident #85 having loose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to complete treatments, provide medications and obtain laboratory testing as ordered by the physician. This affected one (#86) of three residents reviewed for condition change. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record revealed Resident #86 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to acute osteomyelitis to the left ankle and foot, anorexia, sepsis due to Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), aftercare following surgical amputation, type 2 diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, dementia, and an open wound on the left foot. The resident was discharged on 09/03/25.a. Review of the Plan of care dated 08/24/25 revealed Resident #86 was at risk for skin breakdown and development of pressure injury related to hospitalization, and left foot wound due to partial second metatarsal amputation. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-23 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure laboratory testing was completed per physician order. This affected one (#86) of three residents reviewed for condition change. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record revealed Resident #86 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to acute osteomyelitis to the left ankle and foot, anorexia, sepsis due to Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), aftercare following surgical amputation, type 2 diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, dementia, and an open wound on the left foot. The resident was discharged on 09/03/25.A comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) laboratory test dated 08/27/25 revealed Resident #86's potassium level was 4.0 milliequivalents per liter (mEq/L) of blood. The normal reference range for Potassium was 3.5 mEq/L to 5.3 mEq/L.Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident #29 and #71 was treated in a dignified manner. This affected two residents (#29 and #71) of three residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 72. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an initial admission date of 06/02/25 with the diagnoses including but not limited to encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system, infarction of spleen, activated protein C resistance, extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of mucosa associated lymphoid tissue, asthma, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, edema, atrial fibrillation, gout, sarcoidosis, hyerplipidemia, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, presence of urogenital implants and other diseases of spleen. Review of the resident admit/readmit screener dated 06/02/25 revealed the resident had no cognitive deficit. The assessment indicated the resident was admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify Resident #61's primary care physician of an unstageable deep tissue injury (DTI) (Persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon or purple discoloration, intact skin with localized area of persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon, purple discoloration due to damage of underlying soft tissue. This area may be preceded by tissue that is painful, firm, mushy, boggy, warmer or cooler as compared to adjacent tissue). This affected one resident (#61) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 72. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #61 revealed an initial admission date of 09/28/24 with the diagnoses including but not limited to COPD, symbolic dysfunction, nicotine dependence, pressure induced deep tissue damage to left heel, dysphagia, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, retention of urine, history of traumatic brain injury, constipation and gout. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility to ensure the required information was provided to the receiving provider and the transfer was documented in the resident's medical record. This affected one resident (#42) of three residents reviewed for transfers. The facility census was 72. Findings Include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #42 revealed an initial admission date of 12/02/22 with the diagnoses including but not limited to dementia with behavioral disturbances, symbolic dysfunctions, abnormal posture, violent behavior, repeated falls, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, osteoporosis, overactive bladder, obesity and depression. The resident was discharged to an acute care hospital on [DATE]. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a severe cognitive deficit. Review of the progress note dated 06/03/25 at 12:29 P.M. revealed the nurse assessed the resident and she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to residents with indwelling medical devices utilized enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) as required. This affected one resident (#39) of three residents reviewed for incontinence. The facility census was 72. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed an initial admission date of 07/26/22 with the latest readmission of 02/10/23 with the diagnoses including but not limited to dementia with behavioral disturbances, dysphagia, chronic pulmonary edema, adult failure to thrive, hepatic failure, gastrostomy status, pressure ulcer of sacral region stage IV, disorders of lung, hypertension, depression, hyperlipidemia and osteoarthritis. Review of the plan of care dated 10/07/22 revealed the resident was prone to alterations in bowel and bladder function related to weakness, decreased mobility, non-ambulatory status, dementia, history of urinary tract infection, incontinence of bowel and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure weekly skin assessments were accurate and completed as well as treatment orders being in place and timely for two ( Resident #21 and #41) out of three residents reviewed for skin breakdown. The facility census was 85. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #21, revealed an admission date of 12/2/22. Diagnoses included but were not limited to unspecified dementia, cognitive communication deficit, overactive bladder, depression, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of the resident is rarely/never understood. The resident was assessed to require total dependence on toilet hygiene, shower/bathe self, bed mobility and transfers. Review of the physician's order for Resident #21 dated 01/21/25 at 10:36 A.M. revealed cleanse area under right breast with wound cleanser,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, facility investigation report review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of resident abuse to the State agency as required. This affected one resident (#46) of two resident investigative reports reviewed. The census was 83. Findings Include: Record review revealed Resident #46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, unspecified cirrhosis of liver, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type II diabetes, dependence on supplemental oxygen, dependence on renal dialysis, dysphagia, muscle weakness, hypotension, pneumonia, end stage renal disease, dementia, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, cognitive communication deficit, atherosclerotic heart disease, thrombocytopenia, hyperlipidemia, and anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #46 was cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, interviews, and facility investigation review, this facility failed to ensure a resident with a Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care (DNRCC) code status did not receive life saving measures or cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) after a cardiac arrest. This affected one (Resident #3) of the one resident reviewed for appropriate code status. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of [DATE] and a discharge date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cirrhosis of the liver, and viral hepatitis B. Review of Resident #3's code status revealed a signed document dated [DATE] indicating a Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care code status. Review of Resident #3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, hospital documents review, staff interview, and facility policy review, this facility failed to obtained ordered urine samples for testing due to cloudy urine. This affected one (Resident #196) of the five resident reviewed for care and treatment to prevent hospitalization. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #196 revealed an admission date of 11/04/2022. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, Urinary tract infections, and the need for assistance with personal care. Review of the annual Minimal Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #196 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating an intact cognition for daily decision-making abilities. Resident #196 was noted to have an impairment to her bilateral upper extremities and was dependent on staff for toileting and personal hygiene. Resident #196 required the use of an indwelling catheter for urine elimination and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, observations, and facility policy review, this facility failed to maintain infection control measures while completing catheter care. This affected one (Resident #196) of the one resident observed for catheter care. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #196 revealed an admission date of 11/04/2022. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, Urinary tract infections, and the need for assistance with personal care. Review of the annual Minimal Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #196 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating an intact cognition for daily decision-making abilities. Resident #196 was noted to have an impairment to her bilateral upper extremities and was dependent on staff for toileting and personal hygiene. Resident #196 required the use of an indwelling catheter for urine elimination and was always incontinent of bowel movements. Observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure the kitchen's hood filters were free from grease and dust. This had the potential to affect all 91 residents who consumed food from the kitchen. The facility identified two residents (#46 and #48) who ate nothing by mouth. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Observation on 02/26/24 at 8:55 A.M. of the kitchen revealed the filters in the hood which was over the stove tops where food was cooked had a thick build up of grease and dust. Interview on 02/26/24 at 8:55 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #70 verified the observation. DM #70 reported maintenance was responsible for cleaning the hood and he believed they did it twice a year. Interview on 02/28/24 at 1:26 P.M. with [NAME] President of Operations #66 and Culinary Operations Support #67 reported maintenance cleaned the hoods twice a year. Interview on 02/28/24 at 1:55 P.M. with Maintenance Director #130 revealed the hood received maintenance twice a year, however, the kitchen should have been cleaning the filters in between. He reported based on what he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident/ responsible party interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff for personal care received the assistance needed for bathing and other personal hygiene related care. This affected seven (Resident #4, #20, #42, #82, #245, #248, and #253) of nine residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #20's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included difficulty walking, unsteadiness on her feet, and need for assistance with personal care. She did not have diabetes mellitus listed as a known diagnosis. A review of Resident #20's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had clear speech and was able to make herself understood and was usually able to understand others. She was cognitively intact and was not noted to have displayed behaviors during the seven days of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. On 02/26/24 at 2:47 P.M., an observation of Resident #253's room noted there was an intravenous (IV) bag (500 milliliters) of 0.9% Sodium Chloride and tubing hanging from an IV pole against the wall across from his bed. The IV tubing still had the IV catheter attached at the end of it and the IV catheter was exposed and noted to have dried blood in it. The resident's Power of Attorney (POA), who was in the room at the time of the observation, revealed the resident was given IV fluids about three days ago and the IV bag and tubing had been hanging there since then. He indicated there was blood still in the end of the tubing in the IV catheter. A review of Resident #253's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included vascular dementia, syncope and collapse, presence of a right artificial knee joint, and aftercare following joint replacement surgery. A review of Resident #253's physician's orders revealed an order for 0.9% Sodium Chloride with instructions to use 500…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for Resident #30, Resident #59, and Resident #82. This affected three residents (#30, #59, #82) of 27 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 10/31/23 with diagnoses including spinal stenosis, osteoporosis, cord compression, chronic respiratory failure, type two diabetes mellitus, chronic pain syndrome, ankylosing spondylitis of spine, and gout. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #30 had intact cognition. Review of Resident #30's plan of care last reviewed 02/12/24 revealed discharge plans were not indicated in the care plan. Interview on 02/26/24 at 3:08 P.M. with Resident #30 revealed he did not plan on staying in the facility long term. Interview on 02/29/24 at 4:14 P.M. with Social Service Designee #4 verified Resident #30's care plan did not include his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to sufficiently identify and provide activities of interest to Resident #3, specifically on the weekend. This affected one resident (#3) of one resident reviewed for activities. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 10/07/22 with diagnoses including dementia, dysphagia, thrombocytopenia, somnolence, adult failure to thrive, hepatic failure, gastrostomy status, depression, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #3's activity assessment dated [DATE] revealed she found it somewhat important to listen to music, do things with groups of people, and go outside. She did not find it important to read books, participate in religious services or keep up with the news. Review of Resident #3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was rarely or never understood. Review of Resident #3's plan of care dated 06/19/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #4's weights were monitored and addressed timely related to cardio-pulmonary complications and failed to ensure Resident #245's surgical wound and anemia was monitored and properly treated. This affected two residents (Resident #4 and Resident #245) of three residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #4 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic pulmonary embolism, anemia, heart failure, need for assistance with personal care, and adult failure to thrive. Review of MDS completed on 01/24/24 revealed Resident #4 was cognitively intact, had impairment to bilateral upper extremities, required moderate assistance for oral hygiene, maximum assistance for bathing, maximum assistance for dressing, and maximum assistance for personal hygiene. Resident #4 discharged from the facility on 02/12/24. Review of orders revealed an order dated 01/19/24 to obtain Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility's 802 matrix, review of the wound physician's wound evaluations, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's wound on his buttocks was properly assessed and classified to identify it as a pressure ulcer as indicated by the wound physician and not moisture associated skin dermatitis as indicated by the facility's wound nurse. This affected one (Resident #249) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: A review of Resident #249's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following CVA (stroke) affecting the right dominant side, aphasia (difficulty with speech), difficulty walking, unsteadiness on his feet, and the need for assistance with personal care. A review of Resident #249's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was not marked as having any pressure ulcers at the time the MDS assessment was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow occupational therapy recommendations and physician orders for splints. This affected two residents (#3 and #42) of four residents reviewed for position and mobility. The facility census was 93. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 10/07/22 with diagnoses including dementia, dysphagia, thrombocytopenia, somnolence, adult failure to thrive, hepatic failure, gastrostomy status, depression, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 was rarely or never understood. Review of Resident #3's plan of care dated 10/14/22 revealed the resident was at risk for or prone to the development of contractures related to pain and immobility. Interventions included providing positioning and splinting to affected joints as ordered and therapy to evaluate and treat as ordered. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview the facility failed to ensure padded side rails were implemented as ordered for Resident #46 with a history of epilepsy. This affected one resident (Resident #46) of six residents reviewed for accident hazards. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 01/03/2020 with diagnoses that included epilepsy, functional quadriplegia, and stenosis of larynx. Review of the most recent Minimum Data set (MDS) 3.0 quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #46 has a diagnosis of epilepsy, is severely cognitively impaired and is dependent on two person staff assist for personal care. Review of physician orders for Resident #46 revealed an order dated 01/05/2020 for seizure precautions padded side rails every shift. Review of Resident #46 care plan dated 01/22/24 revealed a problem of seizure activity with an intervention of padded bilateral side rails as ordered. Observations of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to timely order and initiate treatment for urinary tract infections (UTI's) for Resident #63 and failed to timely order and initiate appropriate treatments for Residents #22's catheter and Resident #82's nephrostomy tube. This affected three residents (Resident #22, #63, and #82) of three residents reviewed for catheter and urinary tract infections. The facility census was 93. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #63 revealed an admission date of 01/26/2024 with diagnoses that included urinary tract infection, acute kidney failure, presence of urogenital implants (control urine leakage). Review of the most recent Medicare 5 day Minimum Data set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed on 02/01/24 revealed Resident #63 was cognitively intact, has an indwelling catheter and was frequently incontinent. Review of Resident #63's undated document supplied from OhioHealth Urology Physicians revealed peri-urethral estrogen cream…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, effective and individualized nutritional program to ensure nutritional recommendations were addressed timely, nutritional interventions were implemented as ordered, and/or to recognize and address significant/severe resident weight loss. This affected four residents (#19, #22, #23, and #59) of seven residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 93. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 10/23/23 with diagnoses including protein-calorie malnutrition, encephalopathy, retention of urine, dementia, type two diabetes mellitus, adult failure to thrive, systemic lupus, depression, dysphagia, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #22's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 11/12/23, revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition. The MDS reflected Resident #22 weighed 180…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #59 was capable of completing his own tracheostomy care and that tracheostomy care was completed as ordered. This affected one resident (Resident #59) out of one resident reviewed for tracheostomy care. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #59 revealed an admission date of 09/07/20. Diagnosis included tracheostomy status, gastrostomy status, diabetes, and malignant neoplasm at the base of the tongue. Review of Resident #59's quarterly MDS assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact and had a tracheostomy. Review of Resident #58's medical record revealed no evidence Resident #59 was assessed and determined to be competent to complete his own tracheostomy care. Review of Resident #59's February 2023 physician orders revealed an order to remove stoma vent twice daily to clean, and an order to suction the resident's stoma and keep clean of dried secretions as needed. The facility nurses were signing the order indicating they were removing the stoma vent twice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure their contracted pharmacy provided pharmaceutical services to ensure medications were available for administration as ordered by the physician. This affected one resident (Resident #85) of two residents reviewed for antibiotic use. The facility census was 93. Findings include: A review of Resident #85's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included a peritoneal abscess, post-procedural complications and disorders of the digestive system, bariatric surgery status, peritoneal adhesions (post-procedural and post-infection), and perforation of the bile duct. A review of Resident #85's physician's orders revealed she had an order to receive Zosyn 4.5 Grams (Gm) intravenously (IV) every eight hours for a peritoneal abscess. The order had been in place since the resident's admission into the facility. A review of Resident #85's medication administration record (MAR) for February…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, review of drug manufacturer's instructions, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure their medication error rate did not exceed 5 percent (%). The facility had two medication errors out of 35 opportunities resulting in a medication error rate of 5.71%. This affected two residents (#248 and #397) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 93. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident # 248's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/29/2023. Diagnoses included osteomyelitis of the vertebra (sacral and sacrococcygeal region), aphasia following a cerebral infarction, unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and Parkinson's disease. Review of Resident #249's February 2024 physician orders revealed an order for Ceftazidime Intravenous (IV) Solution (antibiotic) Reconstituted 2 grams with instructions to use two grams intravenously three times a day related to osteomyelitis of the vertebra. The order was scheduled to be completed at 6:00 A.M., 2:00 P.M., and 10:00 P.M.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to dispose of expired medication for Resident #47. This affected one resident (#47) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 10/05/2023 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, type two diabetes mellitus with long term use of insulin, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the most recent Minimum Data set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed on 01/10/24 revealed Resident #47 was cognitively intact and required a hypoglycemic medication to decrease blood sugars. Review of physician orders revealed an order with a start date of 01/05/24 for Lantus Subcutaneous Solution 100 unit/milliliters (Insulin Glargine) for diabetes at bedtime. Review of the Medication Administration Record for February 2024 revealed Resident #47 received his ordered dose of Insulin Glargine on 02/27/24 at 9:00 P.M. and his blood sugars were being monitored appropriately and were controlled within a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, review of tray tickets, and review of diet descriptions the facility failed to ensure Resident #3 was served a puree diet as ordered. This affected one resident (#3) of nine residents reviewed for food/nutrition. The facility identified nine residents ( #59, #3, #31, #50, #250, #254, #27, #263, #23) ordered a pureed diet. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 10/07/22 with diagnoses including dementia, dysphagia, thrombocytopenia, somnolence, adult failure to thrive, hepatic failure, gastrostomy status, depression, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed they were rarely or never understood. She was on a mechanically altered diet. Review of Resident #3's physician order dated 10/30/23 revealed they were to receive a regular diet with dysphagia puree texture and nectar thick liquids.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review the facility failed to ensure food allergens were not served to Resident #261, and failed to ensure Resident #1, who had a physician identified lactose intolerance, was not served lactose containing foods. This affected two residents (#261 and #1) of nine residents reviewed for food/nutrition. The facility census was 93. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #261 revealed an admission date of 08/30/22 with a readmission date of 02/23/24, and diagnoses included acute pancreatitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, end stage renal disease and dependent on renal dialysis, chronic heart failure, and osteoporosis. Review of Resident #261's in-progress comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed they had intact cognition. Review of Resident #261's allergy list revealed a mild fish allergy added on 08/30/22. Observation on 02/28/24 at 1:15 P.M. revealed State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #114…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, medical record review, and policy review the facility failed to provide thickened liquids as ordered for one resident (#19). This affected one resident (#19) of nine residents reviewed for food/nutrition. The facility identified six residents (#3, #50, #19, #55, #263 and #42) who required thickened liquids. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 01/16/19 with diagnoses including encephalopathy, type two diabetes mellitus, dysphagia, dementia, depression, osteoporosis, heart failure, and repeated falls. Review of Resident #19's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition. She was on a mechanically altered diet. Review of Resident #19's physician order dated 11/22/23 revealed she was to receive nectar consistency liquids. Observation on 02/29/24 at 12:37 P.M. revealed Resident #19 in her room with her meal. She was noted to have a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete and accurate regarding medications received and the proper location of wounds. This affected three residents (Resident #30, #46, and #85) of 25 residents reviewed for complete and accurate records. The facility census was 93. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #85's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included a peritoneal abscess, post-procedural complications and disorders of the digestive system, bariatric surgery status, peritoneal adhesions (post-procedural and post-infection), and perforation of the bile duct. A review of Resident #85's physician orders revealed she had an order to receive Zosyn 4.5 Grams (Gm) intravenously (IV) every eight hours for a peritoneal abscess. The order had been in place since the resident's admission into the facility. A review of Resident #85's medication administration record (MAR) for February 2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-03-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and facility policy review, thhe facility failed to maintain infection control during Resident #60's dressing change, failed to ensure Resident #380's Foley catheter bag remained off the floor, failed to ensure proper hand hygiene with personal care and meal service, and failed to properly wear personal protecitve equipement related to prevention of COVID-19 transmission. This had the potential to affect all 80 residents residing at the facility at this time. Findings include: 1. Observation on 02/28/22 from 11:44 A.M. through 12:03 P.M. of meal trays being delivered to residents residing on the Nutis hall revealed State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #106 went in and out of residents rooms to deliver residents meal trays along with preparing residents meal trays with out washing hands or using hand sanitizer. STNA #106 was observed delivering meal trays to (8) eight different residents (Resident #09, #25, #278, #52, #69, #66, #39, and #2). Interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, resident interview, observations, and facility policy review, the facility failed to serve food at an appetizing temperature. This affected Resident #24 with the potential to affect all 24 residents residing on the [NAME] Avenue hall (Resident #17, #24, #26, #28, #30, #31, #34, #35, #36, #38 #40, #49, #50, #51 #57, #60, #68, #73, #229, #427, #428, #429, #430, and #432). Findings Include: Review of the facility census, revealed Resident #17, #24, #26, #28, #30, #31, #34, #35, #36, #38 #40, #49, #50, #51 #57, #60, #68, #73, #229, #427, #428, #429, #430, and #432 resided on [NAME] Avenue hall. Observation on 02/28/22 at 12:38 P.M. revealed the lunch meal trays arrived to [NAME] Avenue hall and the door to insulated cart with the trays was left open until it was closed at 12:54 P.M. by housekeeping so she could pass with the linen cart, and State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #109 passed the last tray at 1:02 P.M. (24 minutes after trays arrived to the hall). Observation on 03/02/22 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, resident interview, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide proper assistance with toileting to ensure Resident #24 was treated with respect and dignity at all times. This affected one resident (Resident #24) of two residents reviewed for dignity. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to cord compression, constipation, pain in right shoulder, UTI, hyperkalemia, hyperosmolality and hypernatremia, difficulty walking, spinal enthesopathy thoracolumbar region, repeated falls, weakness, spinal stenosis thoracolumbar region, hypertension (HTN), morbid obesity, major depressive disorder, muscle weakness, anxiety disorder, and urge incontinence. Review of Resident #24's admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident's bladder incontinence was unknown but revealed the resident was wet three to four times per week with small amounts of urine.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-08 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, review of care conference notes, and facility policy review, the facility failed to conduct quarterly care conferences for Resident #36. This affected one resident (Resident #36) of one resident reviewed for care conferences. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date on 07/14/21. Medical diagnoses included cerebral infarction (stroke), chronic viral Hepatitis C, dyspnea (shortness of breath), localized edema, type II Diabetes Mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, blindness in unspecified eye, morbid obesity, muscle weakness, long term use of insulin, dependence on renal dialysis, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #36 had intact cognition and scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. The resident required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-08 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, resident interview, observations, and facility policy review, the facility failed to promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice of meals. This affected one resident (Resident #427) of three residents reviewed for choices. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #427 revealed an admission date of 02/16/22. Diagnoses included orthopedic aftercare following a surgical amputation, type two diabetes, morbid obesity, chronic systolic heart failure, hypertension, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, and long-term use of insulin. Review of Resident #427's plan of care dated 02/18/22, revealed the resident had a nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem related to increased protein needs due to wound healing. Interventions included provide and serve his diet and supplements as ordered. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/22/22, revealed the resident had intact cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 (no impairment) and no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, resident interview, observations, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to obtain a physicians signature and authorization of Resident #60's preferred code status. This affected one resident (Resident #60) of one resident reviewed for advance directives. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 12/28/21. Diagnoses included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), chronic respiratory failure, stage two chronic kidney disease, type two diabetes (DM II), bilateral osteoarthritis of the knees, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, cord compression, morbid obesity, left hand contractures, chronic diastolic heart failure, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, dependence on supplemental oxygen, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), long term use of insulin, hyperlipidemia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), gout, and muscle weakness. Review of the plan of care dated 12/29/21 revealed Resident #60 was prone to cardio-pulmonary complications related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #36 received assistance to be bathed according to schedule. This affected one resident (Resident #36) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date on 07/14/21. Medical diagnoses included cerebral infarction (stroke), chronic viral Hepatitis C, dyspnea (shortness of breath), localized edema, type II Diabetes Mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, blindness in unspecified eye, morbid obesity, muscle weakness, long term use of insulin, dependence on renal dialysis, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #36 had intact cognition and scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. Resident #36 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date on 07/14/21. Medical diagnoses included cerebral infarction (stroke), chronic viral Hepatitis C, dyspnea (shortness of breath), localized edema, type II Diabetes Mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, blindness in unspecified eye, morbid obesity, muscle weakness, long term use of insulin, dependence on renal dialysis, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side. Review of the plan of care dated 07/15/21 revealed Resident #36 was at risk for signs and symptoms of hypo/hyperglycemia and diabetic complications related to diagnosis of Type II Diabetes Mellitus with neuropathy. Resident #36 was prone to elevated blood sugar in the evening and low blood sugar in the morning. Interventions included administer diabetic medication as ordered. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #36 revealed the resident had an order for Lantus Solution 100 unit/milliliter (mL) with instructions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-08 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to schedule an ophthalmology consult appointment timely for Resident #36. This affected one resident (Resident #36) of one resident reviewed for ancillary services. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date on 07/14/21. Medical diagnoses included cerebral infarction (stroke), chronic viral Hepatitis C, dyspnea (shortness of breath), localized edema, type II Diabetes Mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, blindness in unspecified eye, morbid obesity, muscle weakness, long term use of insulin, dependence on renal dialysis, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side. Review of the plan of care dated 07/15/21 revealed Resident #36 was prone to impaired vision related to blindness to left eye. Interventions included to identify factors affecting visual function including physiological,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #27's interventions to promote wound healing and prevent pressure ulcer development were in place at all times. This affected one resident (Resident #27) of seven residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of left middle cerebral artery, type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, aphasia following cerebral infarction, dysphagia following cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, chronic kidney disease, and major depressive disorder. Review of the physician order dated 01/13/22, revealed Resident #27 was to wear Prevalon boots to her bilateral lower extremities at all times. Review of a physician order dated 01/09/22 revealed HydraGuard moisture barrier was to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #37's interventions were implemented to reduce the resident's risk of contracture and skin break down related to left sided weakness. This affected one resident (Resident #37) of one resident reviewed for limited range of motion. Findings include: Record review for Resident #37 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, solitary pulmonary, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, traumatic subdural hemorrhage with loss of consciousness, dysphagia oropharyngel phase, cognitive communication deficit, aphonia anxiety disorder, facial weakness following cerebral infarction, paroxysmal fibrillation, atrial flutter hypertension major depressive disorder recurrent, acute post hemorrhagic anemia, cardiomyopathy, gastrostomy status muscle weakness and speech disturbances . Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/13/22, revealed this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow ordered fall prevention measures for Resident #30. This affected one resident (Resident #30) of six residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #30 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, type two diabetes mellitus, gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, atherosclerotic heart disease, encephalopathy, and history of falling. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #30 had moderately impaired cognition. Resident #30 had one fall without injury since the previous assessment. Review of the progress note dated 10/01/21, revealed Resident #30 was found on the floor in her room. The immediate intervention was a floor mat to protect from injury. Review of the plan of care dated 12/07/21, revealed Resident #30 was prone to falls related to her diagnoses, impaired strength, and poor endurance,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, resident interview, observations, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #24 received appropriate treatment and services to maintain or restore bowel and bladder function. This affected one resident (Resident #24) of one resident reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 09/29/21 with diagnoses including but not limited to cord compression, constipation, pain in right shoulder, UTI, hyperkalemia, hyperosmolality and hypernatremia, difficulty walking, spinal enthesopathy thoracolumbar region, repeated falls, weakness, spinal stenosis thoracolumbar region, hypertension (HTN), morbid obesity, major depressive disorder, muscle weakness, anxiety disorder, and urge incontinence. Review of Resident #24's admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident's bladder incontinence was unknown but revealed the resident was wet three to four times…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely address Resident #67's weight loss. This affected one resident (Resident #67) of four residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: Record review for Resident #67 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including infection of amputation stump, left extremity, pressure ulcer of left buttock stage 1, history of falling, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and depression. Review of the care plan, dated 01/11/22, revealed Resident #67 was at nutritional risk for significant weight loss, and altered nutrition needs related to diagnosis. Interventions included monitor for changes in nutritional status and report to dietitian and physician as indicated, obtain and monitor lab/diagnostic work as ordered, report results to physician and follow up as indicated, provide and serve supplement as ordered, weight per order/facility protocol and alert physician to any significant loss or gain. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, resident interview, observations, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to administer Resident #60's oxygen per physician orders. This affected one resident (Resident #60) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 12/28/21. Diagnoses included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), chronic respiratory failure, stage two chronic kidney disease, type two diabetes, bilateral osteoarthritis of the knees, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, cord compression, morbid obesity, left hand contractures, chronic diastolic heart failure, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, dependence on supplemental oxygen, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), long term use of insulin, hyperlipidemia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), gout, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #60's plan of care dated 12/29/21, revealed the resident was prone to cardio-pulmonary complications related to COPD. history of respiratory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a rational was provided for a denial of Resident #2's pharmacy recommendations. This affected one resident (Resident #2) of five residents reviewed for drug regimen review. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 02/21/19. Diagnosis included osteoarthritis, cognitive communication deficit, major depressive disorder, and dementia with behavioral disturbances. Review of Resident #2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03 indication Resident #2 with a severely impaired cognition for daily decision making ability. Resident #2 required supervision from one staff member for bed mobility, transfers, ambulation and toilet use, and set up assistance only for eating. Resident #2 was noted to have impairments to bilateral upper extremities and required the assistance of a walker…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to decrease Resident #60's psychotropic medication per pharmacy and physician recommendations. This affected one resident (Resident #60) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 12/28/21. Diagnoses included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), chronic respiratory failure, stage two chronic kidney disease, type two diabetes, bilateral osteoarthritis of the knees, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, cord compression, morbid obesity, left hand contractures, chronic diastolic heart failure, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, dependence on supplemental oxygen, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), long term use of insulin, hyperlipidemia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), gout, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #60's care plan dated 12/29/21, revealed the resident was prone to mood indicators, at risk for potential adverse side effects…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-08 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, resident interview, observations, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to assist Resident #60 in obtaining urgent dental care. This affected one (Resident #60) of four residents reviewed for dental care. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 12/28/21. Diagnoses included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), chronic respiratory failure, stage two chronic kidney disease, type two diabetes, bilateral osteoarthritis of the knees, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, cord compression, morbid obesity, left hand contractures, chronic diastolic heart failure, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, dependence on supplemental oxygen, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), long term use of insulin, hyperlipidemia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), gout, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #60's Admit/Readmit Screener dated 12/28/21, revealed the resident did not have her own…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$47,740 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $47,740 — penalty dated 2025-10-23
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-01-27 for 17 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHRISTIAN, CHRIS | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 07/01/2019 |
| MIU, GEORGE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/13/2021 |
| ROSEN, GARY | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 08/17/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365026. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.