Worthington Christian Village

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 127 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 54.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 66 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 40 beds and averages 31.1 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 6.15 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 4.04 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.40 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.46 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.85 to 1.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-01-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THIS IS AN INCIDENCE OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY.Based on record review, staff interview, facility investigation report review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate physical assistance with bed mobility. This resulted in Actual Harm to Resident #43 when one staff person was changing the bed sheets and rolled Resident #43 out of bed onto the floor, resulting in a leg fracture. Resident #43 required the assistance of two staff for bed mobility. This affected one (Resident #43) of two residents reviewed for falls. The census was 32.Findings Include:Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Pertinent diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy, cerebrovascular disease, spondylosis, degenerative disease of nervous system, and fibromyalgia.Review of Resident #43's minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/14/24, revealed she was cognitively intact, and required substantial/maximal assistance for rolling…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #2 and #28's care plans accurately reflected the resident's prescribed medications. This affected two residents (#2 and #28) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 32.Findings include:1.Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/25/16 with diagnoses including dementia, heart failure, dysphagia, hypertension, low back pain, anorexia, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and hallucinations.Review of Resident #28's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed moderately impaired cognition. She received diuretics during the lookback period.Review of Resident #28's physician order dated 10/15/25 revealed an order for Lasix (diuretic) 20 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth one time a day for chronic heart failure.Review of Resident #28's plan of care on 01/21/26 revealed diuretic use was not addressed.Interview on 01/22/26 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, medical record review, and review of facility policies the facility failed to document on a new skin area for Resident #9 and provide documented justification for the start of an antibiotic. This affected one resident (#9) of two residents reviewed for skin conditions. The facility census was 32.Findings include: Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/04/24 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, metabolic encephalopathy, dysphagia, unspecified mood disorder, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and sialoadenitis.Review of Resident #9's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed moderately impaired cognition.Review of Resident #9's physician order dated 01/19/26 to 01/24/26 revealed an order for Mupirocin External Ointment (topical antibiotic ointment used to treat skin infections) 2% three times a day for five days for mouth lesion.Review of Resident #9's progress notes and assessments on 01/21/26 at 8:00 A.M. revealed there was no documentation in Resident #9's medical record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were completed in two separate quarters within the first year of admission. This affected one (Resident #32) of five residents reviewed for pharmacy recommendations. The census was 32.Findings Include: Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were cerebral infarction, muscle wasting and atrophy, dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, wedge compression fracture of first lumbar vertebra, hypertension, Alzheimer's disease, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, anxiety disorder, depression, mood disorder, and vascular dementia. Review of her minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/08/26, revealed she had a severe cognitive impairment.Review of Resident #32's physician orders revealed the following psychotropic medications: Buspirone HCl (anxiolytic) five milligrams (mg) one tablet twice daily for anxiety, which was started on 04/17/25, and Citalopram Hydrobromide…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure blood pressure and pain medications were administered within the ordered parameters. This affected one resident (#17) of two reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 32.Findings include: Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/24/25 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, spinal stenosis, essential hypertension, alcohol dependence, and hyperlipidemia. Review of Resident #17's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 completed 12/31/25 revealed no cognitive deficit.Review of Resident #17's physician order dated 12/24/25 revealed an order for Carvedilol (used to lower heart rate and blood pressure) oral tablet 25 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth two times a day related to primary hypertension, with parameters to hold the medication if the systolic blood pressure (SBP) is less than 110 millimeters per mercury (mmHg) or the pulse is less than 60 and to notify the physician or nurse practitioner (NP). Review of Resident #17's physician order…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, review of hospice provider contract, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure hospice documentation was reviewed and consistent with facility orders and plan of care for a resident. This affected one resident (#6) reviewed for hospice. The facility census was 32.Findings include:Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/20/24 with diagnoses including but not limited to cerebral atherosclerosis, vascular dementia, anxiety disorder, hypertension, and bipolar disorder.Review of Resident #6's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed severe cognitive impairment. Review of MDS revealed the resident held food in their mouth/cheeks and/or had residual food in mouth after meals and complained of difficulty or pain when swallowing.Review of Resident #6's physician orders revealed a diet order dated 12/20/24 for a regular diet, mechanical soft texture and honey thick liquids.Review of quarterly nutrition reviews dated 06/30/25,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-03-21 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, review of the dietary spreadsheets, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate portion sizes during a lunch meal. This had the potential to affect all 32 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings include: Observation of lunch meal service on 03/20/24 at 12:00 P.M. with Server #30 revealed a medium sized metal container was filled with various serving scoops, ladles, and spoons in it. Server #30 did not have a dietary spreadsheet to use for reference when he placed the serving utensils in each food item. Interview on 03/20/24 at 12:08 P.M. with Server #30 confirmed the following serving utensils were used for the following food items: • Breakfast Casserole: #10 scoop (half a cup) • Regular beef stroganoff: #8 scoop (three eights of a cup) • Regular green beans: a large slotted spoon without a portion size • Regular buttered noodles: large spoon without any slots and without a portion size indicated • Pureed green beans: #10 scoop • Pureed noodles: #16 scoop (one-fourth cup) • Pureed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly store and date food items in the freezer area of the kitchen and failed to utilize appropriate hand hygiene during lunch meal service. This had the potential to affect all 32 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings include: During the initial tour of the kitchen on 03/19/24 at 10:32 A.M. with Dining Director (DD) #108, the following food items were found to be stored inappropriately and not dated in the freezer: a large plastic bag of chili lime tilapia which had been opened with no date, a plastic bag of chicken fingers which had been opened with no date, a plastic bag of popcorn shrimp which had been opened with no date, a bag of Texas Toast which had been opened and was missing four pieces of toast did not have a date, a bag of frozen sub buns in a blue plastic bag which had been torn open, exposing the buns directly to the cold air, and did not have a date on it, and a bag of egg rolls which had been opened with no date. DD #108 confirmed all of the above findings.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely follow up on a pharmacy recommendations and implement the physician's response to the pharmacy recommendations. This affected two residents (Residents #10 and #178) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 32. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed a readmission date on 01/06/24. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy and heart disease. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 had mild impaired cognition. Review of the pharmacy recommendation dated 05/19/23 revealed the pharmacist recommended to recheck Resident #10's thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) (measures how much of this hormone is in your blood) and thyroxine test (free T4) (measures the level of T4 in your blood) due to a dosage increase in Synthroid. The physician agreed and ordered to have TSH and free T4 labs completed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility policy, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications. This affected three (Resident #2, #9, and #10) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. The facility census was 32. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/04/24. Diagnoses included altered mental status, urinary incontinence, and urinary tract infection (UTI). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/13/24, revealed the resident had impaired cognition and was taking an antibiotic. Review of Resident #9's urine culture and sensitivity collected on 03/11/24 with a report date of 03/14/24 revealed Resident #9 had a UTI with Serratia Marcescens and Enterococcus Faecium present. The report stated Resident #9 should be treated for Enterococcus Faecium bacteria. Review of the antibiotics effective to treat Enterococcus Faecium showed nitrofurantoin, tetracycline, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents received ongoing monitoring of medication side effects for psychotropic and antianxiety medication. This affected two (Residents #8 and #19) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 32. Finding include: 1. Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/25/16 with diagnoses of depression and anxiety. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 01/08/24 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and receiving antipsychotics on a routine basis. Review of the care plan completed on 12/20/23 for Resident #8 revealed staff should administer medications as ordered and monitor and document for side effects. Review of Resident #8's current physician orders for 03/2024 revealed an order where the staff were required to monitor for adverse side effects of antipsychotics, initiated on 08/10/23. If side effects are noted, staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$13,870 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $13,870 — penalty dated 2026-01-27

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH