No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Roscoe Gardens Skilled Nursing And Rehab

100 South Whitewoman Street, Coshocton, OH 43812 · For profit - Corporation · 72 certified beds · (740) 622-1220 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited May 20241 immediate-jeopardy citation$60,645 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $60,645 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-14)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
305 Downtowner Plz · (740) 295-9177 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.5 mi
190 Chestnut St · (740) 295-5403 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
400 Downtowner Plz · (740) 622-6523 · Call to confirm hours
Park
N Whitewoman St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.1%5.3%15.4%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.7%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms37.5%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury8.4%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened1.7%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication35.2%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine86.5%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.0%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.9%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.5%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.3%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine73.9%75.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.4%24.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.9%12.9%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.401.731.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.601.801.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 77 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

61.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
58.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.28U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 58.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF61.7%CMS range 50.7–72.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 6.5–13.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge58.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge41.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge46.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.2%CMS range 3.1–10.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.651.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.59
RN hours/ resident / day
0.70
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.81
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.09
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.50
RN hoursweekends
50.0%
Total nursing turnover
45.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 72 beds and averages 61.4 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.09 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.81 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.26 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-30)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-10)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

52 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, review of a facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI) and investigation, review of the facility's abuse policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation of Property, and interviews with staff, residents and the authorities, the facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was free from an incident of resident-to-resident abuse. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and physical and psychosocial harm on 04/21/24 at approximately 7:45 A.M., when Resident #2, was physically abused/assaulted by Resident #3. Resident #3 struck Resident #2 multiple times resulting in two facial lacerations with bleeding, a laceration to the lower lip, and multiple hematomas (bruises) to the resident's bilateral arms, upper portion of her breasts, and upper chest wall. The incident occurred in the dining room where there were no staff present. Resident #2 also sustained psychosocial harm as a result of the incident, verbalizing her fear of reoccurrence, asking for her room to be inspected for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, hospital record review, review of radiological studies, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care, services and interventions were in place to prevent the development of an avoidable pressure ulcer for Resident #8. Actual Harm occurred on 10/24/25 when Resident #8 developed an avoidable suspected deep tissue injury (DTI) (a severe pressure-related wound damaging skin and underlying soft tissues, often starting under intact skin as a bruise-like purple or maroon area, that rapidly deteriorates to reveal significant tissue death-necrosis) to the left heel following a fall with a fracture to the right fibula, which impaired the resident's mobility and increased her dependence and need for assistance with activities of daily living (ADL). The wound evolved to an unstageable pressure ulcer with eschar (a full-thickness skin loss where the wound's true depth is hidden by yellow, tan, gray, black, or brown tissue-slough and/or eschar,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident privacy during medication administration.This affected one resident (Resident #45) of three observed for medication administration. Findings Include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, transient cerebral ischemic attack, atrial fibrillation, anemia, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and overactive bladder.Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #45 had intact cognition.Observation of medication administration on 06/09/26 at 9:15 A.M. revealed Resident #45 was outside in the smoking tent. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #200 prepared the medication for Resident #45 inside the building, took them outside to the smoking tent and handed Resident #45 the plastic cup of medication in front of the four other residents. LPN #200 did not ask Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of the controlled substance administration record, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure narcotic medications were signed out and administered by the same licensed nurse. This affected one resident (Resident #56) of three reviewed for medication administration. Findings Include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder, hypertension, congestive heart failure, dementia, and metabolic encephalopathy.Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #56 had severely impaired cognition and had a prognosis of less than six months. Review of the June 2026 physician's orders revealed Resident #56 had an order for lorazepam 1.0 milligrams every eight hours and every 12 hours as needed for restlessness for 90 days. Review of the June 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed on 06/09/26 at 6:00 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record, interview, review of manufacture guidelines, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent when medications were not timely administered before meals as ordered, expired medications were administered, and insulin was administered without priming. Out of 36 opportunities for error, four errors were made to equal an error rate of 11.1 percent (%). This affected one resident (Resident #34) of three observed for medication administration.Findings Include: 1. a. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included diabetes, pemphigus vulgaris, bullous pemphigoid, ocular hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, depression, pain in right knee, anxiety disorder, and insomnia.Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #34 had intact cognition. Review of the June 2026 physician's orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure controlled mediations were not pre-poured and stored in the top drawer of the unlocked medication cart, without being promptly administered to the resident. This affected one resident (Resident #56) of 13 residents (#3, #9, #12, #26, #32, #33, #35, #45, #46, #47, #48, #51, and #56) who had medication in the Buckeye Hall medication cart #1.Findings Include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder, hypertension, congestive heart failure, dementia, and metabolic encephalopathy.Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #56 had severely impaired cognition and had a prognosis of less than six months. Review of the June 2026 physician's orders revealed Resident #56 had an order for lorazepam (brand name: Ativan), a controlled medication, 1.0 milligrams…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the medical record, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to maintain proper infection control procedures during medication administration. This affected two residents (Resident #34 and #45) of three observed for medication administration. Findings Include:1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included diabetes, pemphigus vulgaris, bullous pemphigoid, ocular hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, depression, pain in right knee, anxiety disorder, and insomnia.Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #34 had intact cognition. Review of the June 2026 physician's orders revealed Resident #34 had an order for Admelog SoloStar Pen 30 units subcutaneously before meals for diabetes and Novolog FlexPen subcutaneously per sliding scale before meals for diabetes. Observation of medication administration on 06/09/26 at 8:05 A.M. revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, review of facility policy, and review of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) website, the facility failed to store and serve food under sanitary conditions. This had the potential to affect all 59 residents residing in the facility, who ate food from the kitchen. Findings Include:1. Observation of the kitchen on 12/15/25 from 8:55 A.M. to 9:14 A.M. revealed in the over the tray foodservice serving area, there were two dirty exhaust fans with a large amount of a brown and gray fuzzy substance on them. The white paint on the ceiling over the food serving area was also chipping and bulging from the ceiling. An interview with [NAME] #117 on 12/15/25 at 9:06 A.M. confirmed the presence of a brown and gray fuzzy substance on the exhaust fans and the presence of chipping ceiling paint over the food serving area. An interview with Dietary Director #74 on 12/15/25 at 9:08 A.M. confirmed the presence of a brown and gray fuzzy substance on the exhaust fans and the presence of chipping ceiling paint over the food serving area. 2. Observation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-30 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure smoking regulations were being adhered to in accordance with NFPA 101 - 2012 Edition, Section 19.7.4 per the regulations. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 59 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: Observation on 12/18/25 during a tour of the facility at 8:56 A.M. with the Director of Maintenance (DM) #131 noted the designated smoking area in the central enclosed courtyard was not being properly maintained. Thirty-seven cigarette butts were on the ground. Three butts were in a pine bush and had burned some of the needles. A cigarette receptacle was also present. An interview with the DM #131 verified the findings at the time of observation. An interview with the Administrator on 12/17/25 at 3:23 P.M. revealed that smokers were expected to use the two available fireproof cigarette receptacles to dispose of their cigarette butts after smoking. Review of the facility policy dated September 2022 titled, Smoking Policy, revealed that the smoking area…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interviews, review of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) instructions on how to use a nebulizer, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #7's oxygen was administered as ordered. This affected one (Resident #7) out of six residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility also failed to ensure oxygen tubing was dated for Resident #6, Resident #26, Resident #27, Resident #44, and Resident #70. This affected five (Resident #6, #26, #27, #44, and #70) out of six residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 59.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #7 was admitted on [DATE] and 08/27/25 with diagnoses including hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, displaced fracture of right femur, severe-protein-calorie malnutrition, and anxiety. Review of a plan of care dated 08/19/25 revealed Resident #7 had impaired respiratory status. Interventions included to monitor vital signs and pulse oximetry,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interviews, review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to follow infection control procedures while serving food to residents under contact precautions. This affected two (Residents #21 and 26) out of five residents reviewed for infection control. Also, the facility failed to properly clean the glucometer and place a barrier between the glucometer and a potentially contaminated surface. This affected one (Resident #60) of one resident observed for blood glucose check on the Sycamore hallway and had the potential to affect the five additional (Residents #4, #5, #17, #32, and #54) identified by the facility that had blood glucose checks on Sycamore hallway. Additionally, the facility failed to have proper personal protective equipment (PPE) in place for Resident #13 under enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). This affected one (Resident #13) of three residents under EBP in the Sycamore…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure privacy was maintained while Resident #17 was being taken to the shower room. This affected one (Resident #17) out of one reviewed for dignity and respect. Facility census was 59. Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #17 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease, diabetes, and anxiety disorder.Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #17 was cognitively intact and required substantial/maximal assistance for showering and bathing. An observation on 12/16/25 at 1:44 P.M. revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #124 was transporting Resident #17 from his room to the shower room in a shower chair. Resident #17 was wearing a gown that covered the front of the resident, though a side view of Resident #17 revealed the resident's buttocks and genitals were able to be seen below the hole in the seat in the shower chair. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 40 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe environment. This affected one resident (#4) of four sampled for environment. The facility census was 59.Findings Include: Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/20/22, a re-entry date of 07/07/24 and diagnoses including but not limited to diabetes, dysphagia, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, osteomyelitis, schizoaffective disorder, schizophrenia, peripheral vascular disease, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder and hypertension. Review of Resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating that the resident was cognitively intact. Further review of the MDS revealed the resident was independent or required set up assistance with eating, bed mobility, transfers and wheelchair mobility, required partial/moderate assistance with toilet hygiene and showering or bathing, had an indwelling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-30 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide a bed hold letter to a resident and failed to notify the Ombudsman when the resident discharged to the hospital. This affected one resident (Resident #3) out of three residents reviewed for discharges. The facility census was 59 residents.Findings Include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included vascular dementia, and displaced fracture of neck of right femur. Review of Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was assessed as having a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicative of intact cognitive status. Review of Resident #3's nursing progress notes dated 08/20/25 revealed that he had a fall and was discharged to the hospital for an evaluation. Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed that he was hospitalized from [DATE] to 08/24/25. There was no documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #7's fingernails were trimmed and cleaned. This affected one (Resident #7) out of three reviewed for activities of daily living. Facility census was 59.Findings included:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #7 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, displaced fracture of right femur, severe-protein-calorie malnutrition, and anxiety.Review of Resident #7's plan of care dated 08/06/25 revealed Resident #7 had an activity of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit. Interventions included to assist the resident with activities of daily living such as dressing, grooming, personal hygiene, locomotion, and oral care. Review of Resident #7's physician order dated 10/21/25 at 3:47 P.M. revealed Resident #7 was admitted to hospice with diagnosis of hypertensive heart disease with heart failure. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure timely care and services were provided to Resident #8 who had a fall which resulted in a fracture. This affected one resident (#8) out of five reviewed for accidents. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure appropriate catheter care was provided for Resident #7 when the resident's indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag was not properly positioned or secured in accordance with facility policy and accepted catheter care standards. This deficient practice affected one resident (#7) of two residents reviewed for catheter care. The facility reported ten residents with indwelling urinary catheters. Facility census was 59.Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/16/22 with diagnoses including, but not limited to dementia without behavioral disturbances, anxiety, major depressive disorder, and unspecified intellectual disabilities. Review of Resident #8's care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of resident diet slips, interview, and observation, the facility failed to ensure timely initiation of nutritional supplement recommendations and failed to ensure nutritional supplements were available and received as ordered. This affected two residents (#3 and #8) of three residents reviewed for nutrition.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/16/22 with diagnoses including, but not limited to dementia without behavioral disturbances, anxiety, major depressive disorder, and unspecified intellectual disabilities. Review of Resident #8's care plan dated 01/03/25 revealed the resident was at risk for altered nutritional status related to dementia, anxiety, communication problems, and on 11/07/25 it was updated to include an altered diet texture, unplanned weight loss and poor intakes. Interventions included provide feeding/dining assistance as needed and provide nutritional supplements as ordered by the physician. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-30 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, staff interviews and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to have parameters in place for as needed pain medications. This affected one (Resident #3) out of two residents reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 59.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of vascular dementia and displaced fracture of the base of the neck of the right femur.Review of Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed that he was assessed as having a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, indicative of intact cognitive status.Review of Resident #3's physician orders dated 08/24/25 revealed that he had an order for Tylenol, a non-narcotic analgesic oral tablet 325 milligram (mg), give 650 mg by mouth every four hours as needed for pain. There were no specified parameters in place for the medication.Review of Resident #3's physician orders dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement pharmacy recommendations signed by the provider in a timely manner. This affected one resident (#49) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 59.Findings include:Review of Resident #49's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/27/23 and diagnoses including but not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction on the right dominant side, chronic pain, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, mood disorder due to know physiological condition, and alcohol abuse uncomplicated.Review of Resident #49's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #49 required a wheelchair for mobility and was independent with wheelchair mobility, was continent of both bladder and bowel, had occasional pain of five out of ten on the pain scale (zero was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility investigations, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. This affected three residents (#28, #50, and #69) out of nine residents reviewed for medication administration. Facility census was 59. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #28 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included mononeuropathy of the right lower leg, pain in right knee, and type two diabetes. Review of Resident #28's physician order dated 11/24/25 revealed Resident #28 was ordered Pregabalin (a medication used to treat nerve pain) 150 milligrams (mg) capsules three times a day, due at 6:00 A.M., 2:00 P.M., and 10:00 P.M. Review of Resident #28's controlled drug record revealed on 11/26/25 at 4:00 A.M. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #96 signed out five Pregabalin 150 mg capsules. Review of Resident #28's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed on 11/26/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, review of the menu spreadsheet, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide and serve pureed bread as planned on the menu. This affected two out of two residents (Resident #8 and #13) who received pureed diets in the facility. The facility census was 59 residents.Findings include: Review of the planned pureed diet spreadsheet for 12/18/25 revealed that a #16 scoop of pureed bread was to be served with the lunch meal on 12/18/25. Observations of the preparation of the pureed diets on 12/18/25 from 10:02 A.M. to 10:17 A.M. revealed that no pureed bread was prepared for the pureed diets. An interview with [NAME] #117 on 12/18/25 at 11:51 A.M. confirmed that no pureed bread was made for the pureed diets on 12/18/25 for lunch, and no pureed bread substitute was served. [NAME] #117 stated that it does not work well. An interview with Registered Dietitian #300 on 12/18/25 at 12:22 P.M. revealed that if bread was unable to be prepared properly, she would expect a pureed bread substitute to be served instead.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-30 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #42's call light was within reach. This affected one (Resident #42) out of 28 residents observed for call lights within reach. Facility census was 59. Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #42 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, atrial fibrillation, asthma, and generalized anxiety disorder.Review of Resident #42's care plan dated 02/20/25 revealed the resident was at risk for falls related to impaired cognition and the use of psychotropic medications. Interventions included to maintain the call light within reach.Review of Resident #42's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 02 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also revealed Resident #42 was independent with mobility. An observation on 12/15/25 at 3:03 P.M. revealed Resident #42's call light was between the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen during meal service by not wearing facial hair covering and handling food with bare hands. This affected one resident (Resident #5) and had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 54. Findings Include: A review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to dementia, weakness, and indigestion. Resident #5 required assistance from staff to complete activities of daily living (ADL) tasks and was independent with eating. A review of Resident #5's physician orders revealed an order dated 05/15/25 for a regular, mechanical soft texture, thin liquids consistency diet and preferred small portions. A review of Resident #5's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Section K - Swallowing/Nutritional Status was marked as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure weekly skin inspections were completed as indicated in the resident's comprehensive care plan. This affected one (Resident #54) of three residents reviewed for skin impairment. The facility census was 53. Findings include: Review of the Resident #54's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 01/07/25 with diagnoses that included fall with nasal fracture, influenza A, cerebrovascular accident and traumatic brain injury. Further review of the medical record including weekly skin inspections revealed inspections completed upon admission and again on 01/15/25. No further skin inspections were completed. Resident #54 discharged home from the facility on 02/01/25. Review of the care plan titled potential for altered skin integrity indicated an intervention of weekly skin inspections to be completed. On 04/07/25 at 1:10 P.M. interview with the Director of Nursing verified weekly skin inspections were not completed for Resident #54 on 01/22/25 and 01/29/25 as indicated in the care plan. This…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of invoices, review of alternative menu, review of the contract, observation, and interviews the facility failed to ensure alternate menu items were available. This had the potential to affect all 57 residents residing in the facility. Findings included 1. Interview on 10/07/24 at 9:45 A.M., with Resident #24 revealed the facility doesn't honor food alternatives ordered. Interview on 10/07/24 at 1:17 P.M., with Resident #46 revealed the facility was always out of menu and alternative food items. The other day the facility was out of lettuce and orange juice. The facility quit providing cottage cheese as well, which was on the alternative menu. Interview and observation on 10/08/24 at 8:48 A.M., with Resident #20 revealed he was told the facility was no longer providing residents with cottage cheese and he would have to buy his own. The resident reported he loved cottage cheese and had been purchasing his own. Interview on 10/08/24 at 8:48 A.M. with State Tested Nurse's Aide (STNA) #176 revealed he was told the facility was out of cottage cheese last week, but he was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure the ice machine was maintained and cold air-vents were cleaned. This had the potential to affect all 57-resident residing in the facility. Findings included Observation on 10/09/24 at 12:12 P.M., of the kitchen with revealed the three cold air ducts and one duct no longer used were visibly dusty. Additional observations revealed the bottom drainpipe for the ice machine was running into the floor drainpipe. There was no gap between the ice machine drainpipe and floor drainpipe. The floor drainpipe was clogged and filled with stagnant water filling, backing into the ice machine drainpipe. Findings confirmed during observation with District Manager #129. Review of the food service contract 04/25/21 revealed the contracted company was responsible for providing labor to perform menu and recipes development, procuring, handling, inventorying and storing food and related supplies, preparing, staging, and transporting meals to resident dining areas, and cleaning and sanitizing.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on self-reported incident review, medical record review, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported to the state survey agency in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #26) of one residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/29/22 with admission diagnoses that included anoxic brain injury, schizoaffective disorder and bipolar disorder. Review of Resident #26's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment with a reference date of 08/28/24 revealed the resident had an independent and intact cognition level. Review of the facility on-line self reported incidents (SRI) revealed on 09/30/24 the facility created an SRI for Resident #26 for an allegation of physical abuse. Review of the facility investigation revealed the abuse allegation was reported to staff by Resident #26 on 09/27/24. Review of progress notes for Resident #26 revealed on 09/27/24 the resident made an allegation of physical abuse related to her family hitting her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected medication and pertinent diagnosis. This affected two residents (#6 and #9) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, dysphagia, chronic kidney disease, low back pain, and muscle wasting and atrophy. Review of a physician order, dated 07/30/24, revealed the order for Tramadol 50 milligrams (mg), one tablet every six hours, as needed for pain. Review of the August and September 2024 Medication Administration Records (MAR) revealed Resident #6 received Tramadol 50 mg, one tablet, on 08/30/24, 09/02/24, and 09/03/24. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/05/24, revealed that Resident #6 received an opioid for zero days during the seven day look-back period. Interview on 10/08/24 at 3:24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) document accurately reflected diagnoses. This affected two (Resident #6 and Resident #9) of three residents reviewed for PASRR documents. The census was 57. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, dysphagia, chronic kidney disease, low back pain, and muscle wasting and atrophy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/05/24, revealed the resident had intact cognition and a diagnosis of anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #6's PASRR document, dated 08/24/23, revealed under Section E, there was no check mark selected to indicate the diagnosis of anxiety. Review of the resident's diagnosis list revealed the diagnosis of anxiety on 08/13/20. Review of a physician order, dated 01/03/24, revealed the order for Clonazepam 0.5 milligrams (mg),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure there was consistent communication between the facility and the dialysis center regarding a resident's hemodialysis treatments. This affected one (Resident #52) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. Resident #52 was the only resident in the facility receiving dialysis treatments. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #52 revealed an admission date of 07/12/24. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, essential hypertension, and type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic nephropathy. Review of Resident #52's October 2024 Physician orders revealed orders for the resident to receive outpatient dialysis on Monday, Wednesday and Friday every weekly. The resident has been receiving dialysis three times a week since his admission to the facility. Review of Resident #52's Care Plan dated 08/30/24 revealed the resident has a diagnosis of chronic renal failure and has the potential for complications from hemodialysis. Interventions included outpatient dialysis on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and pharmacy recommendations the facility failed to timely address pharmacy recommendation related to Resident #3's pain medication and lab work. This affected one (#3) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 07/20/22. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus, pain in left hip, and non-pressure chronic ulcer of other part of left foot. Review of Resident #3's Pharmacy Recommendation dated 01/05/24 stated to please evaluate the following as needed medications and assess proper parameters (i.e. pain scale 1-10) to identify which medication to administer or consider discontinuation of one of the agents. The agents listed were acetaminophen 325 mg take two every six hours as needed for pain and tramadol 50 mg as need for pain. Review of Resident #3's Pharmacy Recommendation dated 08/04/24 stated to please be sure the following lab results are posted in the chart as they were unavailable during the of review. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors. This affected one resident (Resident #13) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. The facility census was 57. Findings included: Medical record review revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including infection and inflammatory reaction due to other internal orthopedic prosthetic devices, implants and grafts, subsequent encounter, acute Infection, infection following a procedure, other surgical site, subsequent encounter, and pain. 1. Review of Resident #13's admission orders dated 08/21/24 revealed the resident was ordered vancomycin 2,000 milligrams (mg) intravenous (IV) twice daily for a spinal surgical wound infection. The wound culture grew Enterococcus Faecalis, Candida Albicans, and Staph Haemolyticus . Additional orders for the central line (special access to administer intravenous medication) included to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and policy review revealed the facility failed to ensure medications were stored appropriately. This had the potential to affect all 57 residing in facility. Findings included: 1. Observation on 10/07/24 at 2:04 P.M. revealed the Sycamore Valley medication cart was left unlocked and unattended. The nurse (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #158) was observed in a room with a resident, which was at the other end of the hall. Interview on 10/07/24 at 2:04 P.M., with State Tested Nurse's Aide (STNA) #162 confirmed the medication cart was unlocked and unattended. Review of the facility's policy tilted Medication Administration dated 09/2018 revealed the medication cart is kept closed and locked when out of sight of the medication nurse. 2. Observation 10/08/24 at 7:40 A.M. revealed the facility's Director of Nursing (DON) administered medication to Resident #7. While in the room, whom she shares with Resident #35, a pill cup with several pills on Resident #35's bedside table. The DON asked the resident what the pills were doing there,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure a resident received dental services timely. This affected one (Resident #11) of one reviewed for dental services. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #11's face sheet revealed the resident's primary insurance was Medicaid. Review of Resident #11's progress notes revealed on 09/04/24 the Social Worker (SW) #132 was notified Resident #11 needed to see a dentist related to losing a bottom right filling. Review of Resident #11's progress note dated 09/05/24 revealed the resident had voiced complaints of right-sided mouth pain due to a filling lost from a tooth. The resident requested as needed Tylenol. The medication was administered and effective.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide an appropriate assistive device to maintain/improve the ability to eat independently. This affected one (Resident #5) of two residents reviewed for mobility/restorative. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left nondominant side, muscle wasting and atrophy, lack of coordination, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/21/24, revealed Resident #5 was cognitively intact. There were no behaviors or rejection of care. The resident was receiving hospice services. Review of the Care Plan, dated 01/30/24, revealed Resident #5 was limited in ability to eat and drink related to weakness, cerebral infarction with left-sided hemiplegia, and dysphagia with interventions including to provide diet as ordered and eating assistance.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were in place for Resident #261 who was admitted with a chronic venous ulcer. This affected one (Resident #261) of one residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 57. Finding include: Review of the medical record for Resident #261 revealed an admission date of 09/11/24. Diagnoses included unspecified venous ulcer, cellulitis, morbid obesity, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of Resident #261 wound assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a right ankle unspecified venous ulcer measuring three centimeters (cm) length by three cm width and 0.1 cm deep. The wound was noted to have light exudate of serosanguineous (pale red to pink, thin and watery) drainage. Review of Resident #261 October 2024 physician orders revealed the resident did not have an order in place for EBP. Observations on 10/07/24 at 9:29 A.M. and 03:43 P.M. revealed the Resident #261 did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview with staff, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure three medication carts were locked when unattended. This had the potential to affect 12 residents (#1, #5, #18, #22, #24, #32, #33, #42, #46, #51, #55, and #56) who were cognitively impaired and independently mobile residents. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Observation of the Buckeye Unit on 06/29/24 at 7:50 A.M. revealed three medication carts (#2, #3 and #4) were sitting outside the nurse's station unlocked and unattended. On 06/29/24 at 8:05 A.M. an interview with Nurse #101 confirmed she had left the medication carts unlocked while she went to the restroom. Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Storage-Storage of Medication, dated 01/23, revealed medications and biologicals were stored properly, following manufacturers or providers pharmacy recommendations, to maintain their integrity and to support safe effective drug administrations. The medication supply would be accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel or staff members…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-29 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medial record, review of the facility investigation, interview with the staff, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #58 was administered the correct medication. This affected one resident (#58) of three residents reviewed for medication errors. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include cellulitis of the left upper limb, urinary tract infection, cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia, hypertension, dementia, atherosclerotic heart disease, chronic kidney disease, and atrial fibrillation with pacemaker. She was discharged against medical advice on 06/23/24. Further review of the medical record revealed Resident #58 was allergic to caffeine, chocolate flavoring, codeine sulfate, and meclizine. There was no Minimum Data Set information available. Review of the vital signs for Resident #58 revealed on 06/12/24 her baseline vital signs were blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interview with staff the facility to ensure staff used proper hand hygiene during medication administration. This affected three residents (#25, #51, and #54) of eight residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Observations of medication administration on 06/29/24 at 11:07 A.M. revealed Nurse #101 administered medication to Resident #51, left her room, went to the medication cart in the hallway, and hugged a visitor in the hallway. She went down the hall to another unit, and she stopped at a resident's room and shook hands with a resident's family member then she went out to the medication cart and started to set up medication for Resident #54 without washing her hands. She removed a capsule of gabapentin from the card with her bare hand and put it into the medication cup and started to walk towards the resident's room. She was stopped by the surveyor to administer a new capsule of gabapentin. Nurse #101 stated she did not even realize she used her hands to pop the capsule out of the medication card. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-05-14 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) Job Descriptions, review of a facility self-reported incident (SRI) and investigation, and interviews the facility failed to maintain effective administrative services to provide a comprehensive abuse prohibition program to prevent, timely identify and investigate situations of resident-to-resident physical abuse. This affected one resident (#2) and had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The census was 58. Findings include: Review of the Administrator Job Description, Version 03.2021 revealed the position was to lead and direct the overall operations of the facility in accordance with customer needs, government regulations and Company policies, with focus on maintaining excellent care for the residents while achieving the facility's business objectives. Review of the Director of Nursing (DON) Job Description, version 03.21, revealed the position was to manage the overall operations of the Nursing Department in accordance with Company policies, standards of nursing practices…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of a facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI) and investigation, review of the facility's abuse policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Misappropriation of Property, and interviews the facility failed to ensure a complete and thorough investigation following an allegation of physical abuse. This affected one (Resident #2) of six residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 58. Findings include: Review of the facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI), tracking number 24658, discovery and submission date of 04/21/24, revealed an allegation/suspicion of physical abuse with the initial source of the allegation being a resident victim and a resident witness. The SRI indicated on 04/21/24 at 7:45 A.M. in the dining room, Resident #2 alleged Resident #3 attacked her. There were no staff present during the alleged attack. The only witness was Resident #6. Facility interview with Resident #3 revealed Resident #2 attacked her by pulling her oxygen off and saying, I'm gonna kill you {expletive}. Facility interview with Resident #2 revealed she didn't do anything, and Resident #2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent further potential abuse after allegations of staff being rough and making inappropriate comments were reported to staff. This affected one resident (Resident #7) of 11 residents interviewed regarding abuse. The census was 41. Findings include: Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed diagnoses including major depressive disorder, multiple sclerosis, contractures of both hands, generalized anxiety disorder, lupus anticoagulant syndrome, asthma, emphysema, panic disorder, spondylolisthesis of the lumbar region, and intervertebral disc disorders of the thoracic region. Review of a nursing note dated 01/01/23 at 5:12 P.M. revealed Resident #7's daughter spoke to Registered Nurse (RN) #18. Resident #7 had informed her daughter a STNA told Resident #7 she needed to be repositioned in bed for safety. Resident #7 reported when she refused the STNA said well fall on the floor then. RN #18 documented she explained all care was provided by two staff at all times. Resident #7's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to report allegations of rough handling by staff, inappropriate intimidating remarks made to residents, and allegations of misappropriation of property. This affected one resident (Resident #7) of 11 residents interviewed regarding abuse and missing items. The census was 41. Findings include: Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed diagnoses including major depressive disorder, multiple sclerosis, contractures of both hands, generalized anxiety disorder, lupus anticoagulant syndrome, asthma, emphysema, panic disorder, spondylolisthesis of the lumbar region, and intervertebral disc disorders of the thoracic region. Review of a nursing note dated 01/01/23 at 5:12 P.M. revealed Resident #7's daughter spoke to Registered Nurse (RN) #18. Resident #7 had informed her daughter a STNA told Resident #7 she needed to be repositioned in bed for safety. Resident #7 reported when she refused the STNA said well fall on the floor then. RN #18 documented she explained all care was provided by two staff at all times.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to investigate allegations of staff being rough and making inappropriate comments toward residents. This affected one resident (#7) of 11 residents interviewed regarding abuse. The census was 41. Findings include: Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed diagnoses including major depressive disorder, multiple sclerosis, contractures of both hands, generalized anxiety disorder, lupus anticoagulant syndrome, asthma, emphysema, panic disorder, spondylolisthesis of the lumbar region, and intervertebral disc disorders of the thoracic region. Review of a nursing note dated 01/01/23 at 5:12 P.M. revealed Resident #7's daughter spoke to Registered Nurse (RN) #18. Resident #7 had informed her daughter a STNA told Resident #7 she needed to be repositioned in bed for safety. Resident #7 reported when she refused the STNA said well fall on the floor then. RN #18 documented she explained all care was provided by two staff at all times. Resident #7's daughter requested the STNA not care for Resident #7. RN #18…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected opioid medication use and significant weight loss. This affected two residents (#28 and #29) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified open wound of vagina and vulva, colostomy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, muscle wasting and atrophy, chronic pain. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/30/23, inaccurately revealed that Resident #29 received opioid medication for zero days during the look-back period. Review of a physician order, dated 06/28/23, revealed an order for Dilaudid (opioid pain medication) eight milligrams (mg), one tablet every four hours, as needed for pain. Review of a physician order, dated 06/24/34, revealed an order for Methadone (opioid pain medication) 10 mg, one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure all resident Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) documents were accurate to resident current conditions and diagnoses. This affected two residents (Resident #35 and #40) of three residents reviewed for PASARR documents. The census was 41. Findings Include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including sepsis, pressure ulcers, depression, bipolar disorder, and paraplegia. Review of Resident #40's PASARR document, dated 05/30/23, revealed under Section E, there were no diagnosis listed. Review of the resident's diagnoses list revealed bipolar disorder and depression were added on 06/09/23. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 06/15/23, revealed the resident was cognitively intact, and had diagnoses of depression and bipolar disorder. During interview on 07/25/23 at 11:25 A.M., Social Services Director (SSD) #19 confirmed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #7 and/or her representative was provided an opportunity to participate in the development and revisions of the plan of care. This affected one resident (Resident #7) of 11 residents interviewed regarding participation in planning care. The census was 41. Findings include: Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, lupus anticoagulant syndrome, asthma, emphysema, panic disorder neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, and insomnia. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #7 was able to make herself understood and was able to understand others. Resident #7 was assessed as cognitively intact. There was no documentation indicating Resident #7 nor her family were invited to participate in the care planning process or review of the care plan for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to maintain Resident #7's respiratory equipment in a clean manner and ensure the equipment was inspected and air filter exchanged annually as appropriate. This affected one (Resident #7) of one residents reviewed for environmental concerns. The facility identified six residents (Residents #5, #7, #13, #22, #23 and #25) currently utilizing oxygen concentrators. The census was 41. Findings include: Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/14/22 with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus type II and lupus. Further review of Resident #7's medical record revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment with a reference date of 06/16/23 which indicated the resident had an intact cognition level. Physician's orders indicated Resident #7 was to utilize supplemental oxygen at two liters per minute (lpm) by nasal cannula. Interview with Resident #7 on 07/24/23 at 9:58 A.M. revealed that her oxygen machine needed cleaned. On 07/26/23 at 10:10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure antibiotics were assessed for appropriate indication for use prior to initiating antibiotic therapy. This affected one resident (Resident #4) of five residents reviewed for medication use. The facility census was 41. Findings include: Review of Resident #4's medical records revealed an admission date of 04/21/23 with diagnoses that included dementia, atrial fibrillation, hypertension and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Further review of the medical record including nursing notes revealed on 06/14/23 at 2:22 P.M. Resident #4 advised nursing staff he was having trouble breathing with coughing and white sputum. The nurse notified the physician at this time who orders Pro-BNP (lab test to determine congestive heart failure (CHF)) and a chest x-ray. Results of the chest x-ray revealed patchy modest bilateral airspace disease. Pneumonia should be considered in the appropriate clinical setting. Recommend follow-up examination to confirm resolution of findings. On 06/15/23 at 7:06 A.M. the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-07-27 · tag F0582 — widespread
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to adequately inform/specify in writing, skilled services that would be discontinued. This affected three residents (#6, #203, and #204) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The census was 41. Findings Include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, partial intestinal obstruction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #6's Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) form, dated 02/10/23, revealed services would discontinue on 02/14/23. The NOMNC form did not specify which services would be discontinued. The form stated, the effective date coverage of your current skilled nursing facility will end: 02/14/23. 2. Medical record review revealed Resident #203 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute respiratory disease, multiple sclerosis, muscle wasting, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-07-27 · tag F0623 — widespread
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents and/or resident representatives were provided with transfer notices following hospital transfers. This affected three residents (#46, #49, and #7) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization and discharge and had the potential to affect all 41 residents residing in the facility. The census was 41. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cellulitis of corpus cavernosum and penis, retention of urine, acute kidney failure, and muscle wasting and atrophy. The resident was hospitalized from [DATE] to 06/23/23 for diagnoses of acute kidney injury. Further review of the resident's medical record revealed no evidence that a transfer/discharge form was completed and given or sent to the resident/resident representative. During interview on 07/26/23 at 2:47 P.M., Social Services Director (SSD) #19 confirmed there was no evidence that a transfer form was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-07-27 · tag F0625 — widespread
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents and/or resident representatives were provided with bed hold notices following hospital transfers. This affected three residents (#46, #49, and #7) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization and discharge and had the potential to affect all 41 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cellulitis of corpus cavernosum and penis, retention of urine, acute kidney failure, and muscle wasting and atrophy. The resident was hospitalized from [DATE] to 06/23/23 for diagnoses of acute kidney injury. Further review of the resident's medical record revealed no evidence that a bed hold notice was completed and given or sent to the resident/resident representative. During interview on 07/26/23 at 2:47 P.M., Social Services Director (SSD) #19 confirmed there was no evidence that a bed hold notice was completed and given to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$60,645 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $60,645 — penalty dated 2024-05-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
ALLEGIANCE HEALTHCARE HOLDCO II LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2024
DAUBENMIRE, KEVINIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2024
FINKELSTEIN, ELIEZERIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
HOCHSTADTER, NATANIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
CIBC BANK USAOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 12/01/2024
DUNDR, MICHAELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
SHAMPLE, DENISEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-42.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$525K
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 74%Medicare 8%Other / private 18%

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $525K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$335per resident / day
operating cost
$10,171per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$235per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365880. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next