No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Continuing Healthcare Of Cuyahoga Falls

300 East Bath Road, Cuyahoga Falls, OH 44223 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 98 certified beds · (330) 929-6272 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus Facility (federal watch list)Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Apr 2025Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)2 actual-harm citations$178,725 in federal fines4 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it’s on the federal Special Focus watch list for a persistent pattern of problems
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (91) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $178,725 in federal fines (most recent 2025-11-19)
  • nursing-staff turnover (77%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

/5
CMS overall
Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verifiedNot rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ)Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facilityNot rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
641 Graham Rd · (330) 922-1298 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
75 Graham Rd · (330) 928-6669 · Call to confirm hours
Park
641 Silver Lake Ave · (330) 971-8225 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measuresNot rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.3%5.3%15.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.7%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%0.4%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms12.2%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.8%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened21.9%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.9%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.1%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.3%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control15.2%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.2%8.8%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication9.5%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine24.0%75.6%79.4%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.37U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.19hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 64% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.221.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.38
RN hours/ resident / day
1.04
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.03
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.46
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.26
RN hoursweekends
77.1%
Total nursing turnover
90.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 98 beds and averages 60.0 residents a day — about 61% occupied, or roughly 38 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.46 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.55 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 77% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-26)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2025-12-08)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

91 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 79 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of imaging reports, review of hospital records, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure complaints and origins of pain were comprehensively evaluated and timely reported to a physician. This resulted in Actual Harm on 07/11/25 when Resident #150, who had severely impaired cognition and who was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs), was identified to have bruising and pain in her right hip and was observed by staff grabbing her right thigh. Resident #150's pain medication was changed from as needed to routine, and Resident #150 continued to have pain with no evidence of a thorough pain assessment or assessment of range of motion to the affected extremity. Between 07/11/25 and 07/16/25, Resident #150 continued to have breakthrough pain. On 07/16/25, Resident #150's pain was rated at a 10 out of 10 (worst possible pain) and the physician[SS1] was notified and ordered an x-ray examination, and it was determined Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of the facility investigation and facility policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate the root cause of Resident #27's repeated falls on 03/16/25, 03/30/25, and 04/08/25, and failed to implement appropriate fall prevention interventions for Resident #27 to prevent further falls. Actual Harm occurred on 04/08/25 when Resident #27 fell attempting to transfer herself to the bathroom unsupervised resulting in a fall requiring hospitalization with a distal left tibia fracture. This affected one (Resident #27) of two residents reviewed for falls. The facility census is 50. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 12/26/22 and a readmission date of 04/11/25. Diagnoses included fracture of the shaft of the left tibia, hypertension, and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the care plan dated 12/27/22 revealed Resident #27 has had falls and a potential for injury. Interventions included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-26 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of the facility ombudsman notification log and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the State Long Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman Office was notified of resident discharges from the facility. This affected one resident (Resident #61) of one resident reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 56.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #61 revealed an admission date of 10/07/25 with diagnoses including alcohol abuse, muscle weakness and difficulty in walking. Resident #61 was discharged from the facility on 02/19/26 to her personal residence.Review of the ombudsman notification log labeled, Ombudsman Transfer/Discharge Log for February 2026 (a monthly document sent to the State LTC Ombudsman Office to notify them of resident discharges from the facility) revealed Resident #61's discharge was not on the log.Interview with the Administrator on 05/20/26 at 2:15 P.M. verified Resident #61's discharge information was not sent to the State LTC Ombudsman Office as required.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-26 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessments were transmitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) within fourteen days of completion as required. This affected one resident (Resident #18) of one resident reviewed for resident assessments. The facility census was 56.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 12/24/25 with diagnoses including fractured back, major depressive disorder and insomnia. Resident #18 discharged back to the community with his spouse on 02/03/26.Review of MDS assessment records for Resident #18 revealed a Discharge Return Not Anticipated assessment dated [DATE]. The assessment was noted as completed but not transmitted directly to CMS as required.Interview with MDS Nurse #998 on 05/19/26 at 10:00 A.M. verified the Discharge Return Not Anticipated assessment dated [DATE] was not transmitted to CMS within fourteen days of completion as required.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-26 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and an interview with a representative from the State Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) authority (The Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services), the facility failed to ensure PASRR recommendations for placement and related services were implemented and incorporated into the resident's comprehensive care plan. This deficient practice affected one resident (Resident #42) of two residents reviewed for PASRR assessments. The facility census was 56.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 05/19/25 with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, suicidal ideations, and seizures. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 was moderately cognitively impaired and independent in completing activities of daily living.Review of the Level II PASRR assessment completed by the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (OMHAS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure nebulizer masks and tubing were dated and stored appropriately. This affected two residents (Residents #55 and #56) out of two residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 56.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation (an abnormal heart rhythm), type two diabetes mellitus, depression, and chronic blood clots in the lower extremities.Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #55 was moderately cognitively impaired, sometimes rejected care, was independent with toileting and personal hygiene, and required supervision with transferring.Review of Resident #55's physician orders revealed an order for ipratropium-albuterol (medications that relax airway muscles and increase air flow to the lungs) inhalation solution 0.5 milligrams…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure parameters for Resident #49's blood pressure medications were monitored before administration. This affected one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The total census was 56.Findings include:Record review of Resident #49 revealed she was admitted [DATE] and had diagnoses including dementia, hypertension, and edema. She had an order dated 05/06/25 for amlodipine (an anti-hypertensive medication) to be given daily. The medication was to be held if her systolic blood pressure was under 110 or her heart rate was under 60. Review of her medication administration record revealed the amlodipine was given regularly with no evidence of the blood pressure and heart rate being assessed before administration. Review of her vital signs assessments revealed the heart rate and blood pressure were not being checked daily.Interview with the Director of Nursing on 05/20/26 at 5:05 P.M. confirmed the above findings.This deficiency represents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory medications were stored securely. This affected one resident (Resident #55) out of six residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 56.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation (an abnormal heart rhythm), type two diabetes mellitus, depression, and chronic blood clots in the lower extremities.Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #55 was moderately cognitively impaired, sometimes rejected care, was independent with toileting and personal hygiene, and required supervision with transferring. Review of Resident #55's physician orders revealed an order for ipratropium-albuterol (medications that relax airway muscles and increase air flow to the lungs) inhalation solution 0.5 milligrams (mg)/2.5 mg per 3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure all doors of the secured unit remained in functioning order and failed to ensure Resident #18 was accurately assessed for risk of falls. This affected 17 residents (Residents #3, #10, #12, #16, #19, #24, #25, #28, #30, #38, #40, #42, #46, #47, #49, #51, and #53) of 17 residents residing on the secured unit and one resident (Resident #18) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 55. Findings Include:1. Observation of the secured unit on 03/29/26 at 1:57 P.M. revealed there were three entry and exit points. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was present during the observation and confirmed there were three entry and exit points to the unit. The door leading to the secured unit and dining room/kitchen area opened without having to push on the door for 15 seconds prior to opening. The door alarmed when opened but did not require a code be entered or a button to push to allow the door to open…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-10 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — pattern
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide the necessary dementia care and treatment to maintain the safety and well being residents on the dementia unit. This affected Resident #56 and had the ability to affect all 17 residents residing on the secured unit (Residents #3, #10, #12, #16, #19, #24, #25, #28, #30, #38, #40, #42, #47, #46, #49, #51, and #53). The facility census was 55. Findings Include:Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including vascular dementia severe without behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, alcohol dependence with alcohol induced persisting dementia, anxiety disorder, restlessness and agitation, and generalized anxiety disorder. The resident was transported to the hospital on [DATE] with no information regarding if the resident was admitted , transferred, or discharged .Review of the physician's orders for Resident #56 revealed on 01/29/26 and order was written for Depakote 125 milligrams (mg) (an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure all doors of the secured unit remained in functioning order. This affected 17 residents (Residents #3, #10, #12, #16, #19, #24, #25, #28, #30, #38, #40, #42, #46, #47, #49, #51, and #53) of 17 residents residing on the secured unit. Findings Include:Observation of the secured unit on 03/29/26 at 1:57 P.M. revealed there were three entry and exit points. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was present during the observation and confirmed there were three entry and exit points to the unit. The door leading to the Buckeye unit and dining room/kitchen area would not open even after being pressed on for over one minute. No alarms sounded while the doors were pushed on. A code had to be entered to access/leave the unit. The ADON confirmed the doors should open and alarm after being pushed on for 15 seconds in order to allow egress from the unit.Interview with Director of Support Services (DoSS) #559 on 03/29/26 at 3:35 P.M. revealed he discovered the doors leading on/off the secured unit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to the State Agency for Resident #18. This affected one (Resident #18) of three residents reviewed for reporting alleged violations. The facility census was 55. Findings include:Review of the medical record of Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 06/07/22 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke), diabetes mellitus, hypertension, heart failure and need for personal assistance. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18's cognition was intact, he had no behaviors and had an impairment on one side of his body. Review of the nursing progress note dated 01/05/26 at 6:38 P.M. by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #602 for Resident #18 revealed during breakfast an aide had noted he had swelling to the right side of his face. She stated she assessed him and noted his right top eye lid was swollen, resident cheeks were swollen and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 79 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin for Resident #18. This affected one (Resident #18) of three residents reviewed for investigation. The facility census was 55. Findings include:Review of the medical record of Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 06/07/22 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke), diabetes mellitus, hypertension, heart failure and need for personal assistance. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18's cognition was intact, he had no behaviors and had an impairment on one side of his body. Review of the nursing progress note dated 01/05/26 at 6:38 P.M. by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #602 for Resident #18 revealed during breakfast an aide had noted he had swelling to the right side of his face. She stated she assessed him and noted his right top eye lid was swollen, resident cheeks were swollen and reddened. LPN #602 asked Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #56's immediate discharge was documented accurately and included in the medical record. This affected one resident (Resident #56) of one resident reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 55. Findings Include:Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including vascular dementia severe without behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, alcohol dependence with alcohol induced persisting dementia, anxiety disorder, restlessness and agitation, and generalized anxiety disorder. The resident was transported to the hospital on [DATE] with no information regarding if the resident was admitted , transferred, or discharged .Review of the physician's orders for Resident #56 revealed on 01/29/26 and order was written for Depakote 125 milligrams (mg) (an anticonvulsant used as a mood stabilizer) three capsules given three times a day for vascular dementia, 02/01/26 an order was written for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were accurately completed. This affected three (Residents #18, #42 and #48) of seven residents reviewed for assessments. The facility census was 55. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 06/07/22 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke), diabetes mellitus, hypertension, heart failure and need for personal assistance. Review of the fall risk assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #18 revealed he had fall in the previous three months. Review of the fall investigation dated 12/11/25 at 5:00 P.M. for Resident #18 revealed he was observed laying on the floor next to his bed. Resident #18 had attempted to transfer from the wheel chair to the bed without staff assistance and fell on the floor. He had no injuries noted on the investigation. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18's cognition was intact, he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received showers as scheduled. This affected one (Resident #18) of three residents reviewed for showers. The facility census was 55. Findings include:Review of the medical record of Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 06/07/22 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke), diabetes mellitus, hypertension, heart failure and need for personal assistance. Review of Resident #18's care plan dated 06/07/22 revealed he had self-care deficit with his activities of daily living and needed total assistance of one staff member for bathing. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18's cognition was intact, he had no behaviors and had an impairment on one side of his body. He needed substantial to maximum assistance from staff for showers and bathing. Review of Resident #18's showers under the task section of the electronic record and shower sheets provided by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure to audiology services and intervention were implemented properly. This affected two (Residents #21 and #32) of three residents reviewed for audiology services. The facility census was 55. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 05/01/23 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, depression and anxiety. Review of the care plan dated 01/04/22 for Resident #21 revealed she had a communication problem related to a mild hearing deficit and had bilateral hearing aids. Staff were to assist the resident with inserting and removing hearing aids and consult audiology as indicated. Review of Resident #21's physician orders revealed she had an order dated 08/06/25 for staff to insert hearing aids every morning and remove them at night. Her hearing aides were to be stored in the medication cart. Review of the nursing progress notes for Resident #21 revealed on 12/01/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received pain medications as ordered. This affected one (Resident #21) of one reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 55. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 05/01/23 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, depression and anxiety. Review of the care plan dated 01/04/22 for Resident #21 revealed she had alteration in comfort related to arthritis. Staff were to administer medications as ordered. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #21 revealed an order for Tramadol 50 milligrams (mg) three times a day for pain dated 12/27/25. Review of the narcotic logs for Resident #21 for February 2026 revealed she had utilized her last Tramadol 50 mg pill on 02/13/26 at 6:00 P.M. and had not received another Tramadol 50 mg pill until 02/17/26 at 2:00 P.M. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for February 2026 revealed Resident #21…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, policy review, and job description review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #21 and Resident #32 received ancillary services timely. This affected two residents (Residents #32 and #21) of four residents reviewed for medically related social services. The facility census was 55. Findings Include:1. Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a right ilium fracture, a motor vehicle accident with injuries, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), major depressive disorder, acute pain due to trauma, bipolar disorder with psychotic features, anxiety disorder, history of malignant carcinoid tumor of bronchus and lung, malignant neoplasm of the bladder, and a urostomy (a surgical opening created in the abdominal wall to divert urine outside the body when the bladder is removed, commonly due to cancer or injury). Review of the physician's orders for Resident #32 revealed an order dated 02/13/26 for audiology to evaluate and treat. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #32's medical record accurately reflected ostomy care. This affected one resident (Resident #32) of one resident reviewed for ostomy care. The facility census was 55. Findings Include:Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of a motor vehicle accident with multiple fractures, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder with psychotic features, obstructive and reflux uropathy, anxiety disorder, artificial openings of urinary tract status, malignant neoplasm of bladder, and history of malignant carcinoid tumor of the bronchus and lung. Review of the physician's orders dated 09/12/25 revealed Resident #32 was to have urostomy care on day shift every three days. Staff are to remove the bag and wafer, cleanse the site with normal saline, observe for any abnormalities of the skin/ostomy, apply skin prep to the stoma border, allow the areas to dry, then apply a new…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of the facility menus, interview with staff, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to follow the lunch menu for the residents. This affected all 63 residents in the facility who received their meals from the dining room. The facility census was 63.Findings Include:Review of the menu for 02/25/26 revealed the facility was to serve a corn dog, cheesy mashed potatoes, mixed vegetables, white bread and yellow cake for lunch.Observation of meal service on 02/25/26 at 11:40 A.M. revealed [NAME] #130 was serving corn dogs, regular mashed potatoes, mixed vegetables and vanilla pudding. There was no cheese in the mashed potatoes, no bread was given to the residents and they did not have yellow cake.On 02/25/26 at 12:15 P.M. an interview with [NAME] #130 revealed she did not make the mashed potatoes cheesy and there was not a reason why she did not. She stated they did not have the yellow cake, so they were serving pudding instead and verified they forgot to give the residents bread.On 02/25/26 at 4:15 P.M. an interview with Corporate Dietary Manager…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a safe sanitary kitchen. This affected all 63 residents who ate their meals from the facility kitchen. The facility census was 63.Findings Include: Observations of the kitchen with Corporate Dietary Manager #128 on 02/25/26 at 10:10 A.M. revealed the following concerns:a. There were two 50-gallon trash cans with no lids on them. b. The utensil drawer with the scoops and ladles had a red, sticky substance spilled down inside the drawer with the scoops and ladles laying in it.c. The stainless stain shelf under the steam table had food and a yellow liquid spilled on it.d. There were three three-tiered red food carts which were soiled with food debris and a white liquid dried on them.e. Two-large tubs of rice crispy cereal were not labeled as to when they were opened.f. Two five-pound packages of semi frozen tubes of hamburger were in the stainless stain sink soaking in warm water.g. The dry storage had several pieces of cardboard and paper littering the floor.h. In the refrigerator there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record, interview with the staff, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to knock on the door before entering the room of Resident #26. This affected one resident (Resident #26) of five residents observed during medication administration.Findings Include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, visual loss, mood disorder, psychosis, prediabetes, toxic effect of carbon monoxide, cocaine dependence, major depressive disorder, homelessness, adult failure to thrive and post-traumatic stress disorder.Observation on 02/25/26 at 9:00 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #133 prepared the medication for Resident #26 at the medication cart in the hallway and then walked right into his room without knocking on the door. An interview at this time with LPN #133 verified she had not knocked on the door or waited for a response before entering the room of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the bathroom of Resident #10 was maintained in a safe, comfortable manner. This affected one resident (Resident #10) of eight residents observed for environment.Findings Include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, severe protein calorie malnutrition, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, depression, chronic kidney disease, and left eye blindness.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 had moderately impaired cognition, no psychosis, and no behaviors. The assessment stated the resident required setup or clean-up assistance for toileting and she was occasionally incontinent of urine and always continent of bowel.Observation on 02/25/26 at 11:10 A.M. revealed in the bathroom of Resident #10 there were two softball size holes in the wall where the baseboard was missing under the sink…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of Resident #32's eye drops. This affected one resident (Resident #32) of three reviewed for administering medication per physician's orders.Findings Include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included heart failure, protein-calorie malnutrition, nontraumatic subdural hemorrhage, Wernicke's encephalopathy, macular degeneration, cataracts, diverticulosis, alcohol abuse, fatty liver, hypothyroidism, pancreatitis, and adrenal gland disorder.Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #32 had intact cognition.Further review of the medical record revealed Resident #32 had cataract surgery on 02/25/26.Review of the post operation orders dated 02/25/26 revealed Resident #32 was to start Prednisone 1.0 percent (%) ophthalmic drops with instructions to administer four drops in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record, interview, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to maintain appropriate infection control while administering medication to Resident #21 and #26 and failed to ensure feces-soiled linens were properly contained during care for Resident #20. This affected three residents (Resident #20, #21, and #26) of eight observed for infection control and medication administration.Findings Include:1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, visual loss, mood disorder, psychosis. Prediabetes, toxic effect of carbon monoxide, cocaine dependence, major depressive disorder, homelessness, adult failure to thrive and post-traumatic stress disorder.Observation of medication administration on 02/25/26 at 9:00 A.M. revealed Agency Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #133 popped an Amlodipine 5 milligram (mg) tablet out of the card into her bare hand and placed the tablet into the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure timely and accurate documentation of COVID-19 outbreak identification and reporting. Residents tested positive for COVID-19 between 01/02/26 and 01/03/26; however, documentation reflected delays in notifying residents' responsible parties until 01/06/26 and the county health department until 01/07/26. This affected three residents (#11, #60 and #64) who tested positive for COVID-19 and were not timely notified, 24 residents (#1, #6, #7, #9, #12, #14, #17, #19, #20, #22, #26, #27, #31, #34, #37, #38, #43, #45, #48, #53, #55, #59, #62, #63) who were neither tested nor had documented outbreak notification. The facility census was 63.Findings include: A review of Resident #60's clinical record revealed an admission date of 09/12/25 with diagnoses including dementia with psychotic disturbance, restlessness, agitation, schizophrenia, malnutrition, anxiety, delusional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were served per the dietitian approved menu. This finding affected seven (Residents #14, #21, #22, #27, #40, #44 and #57) residents and had the potential to affect all residents who eat meals in the facility. The facility census was 65.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #14 medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including vascular dementia, altered mental status and anxiety disorder. The resident resides on the secured memory care unit (SMCU).Review of Resident #14's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited severe cognitive impairment.Review of Resident #14's Mini Nutritional Assessment form dated 08/22/25 revealed the resident was at risk for malnutrition and had a weight loss between 2.2 pounds and 6.6 pounds.Review of Resident #14's physician orders revealed an order dated 08/26/23 for a regular diet, regular texture with a regular/thin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure sufficient supervision and intervention was implemented to prevent Resident #11's from eloping, failed to ensure Resident #71 was transferred with staff assistance in a safe and dignified manner, and failed to ensure proper smoking procedures were implemented for five residents (#32, #34, #42, #48 and #52). This finding affected one (Resident #56) of three residents reviewed for elopement; one (Resident #71) of three residents reviewed for transfers; and five residents (#32, #34, #42, #48 and #52) of 17 smokers who reside in the facility. Facility census was 65.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including alcohol abuse, depression and anxiety. Resident #11 resides on the secured memory care unit (SMCU). Review of Resident #11's admission Elopement assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was at a moderate risk of elopement. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the safe handling, transport, and separation of laundry to minimize the risk of exposure to contaminated items. This had the potential to affect all 65 residents who resided in the facility at the time of the survey.Findings include: Observation on 12/03/25 from 9:19 A.M. to 9:32 A.M. revealed one open laundry cart containing bags of soiled linen and one trash can labeled for placement of resident personal laundry. The observation revealed no bins or carts marked for laundry from isolation rooms or laundry that was heavily soiled with blood or bodily fluids. Further observation revealed one box of vinyl exam gloves sitting between two washing machines and no other personal protective equipment (PPE) was observed readily available for rinsing or sorting laundry. Interview on 12/03/25 at the time of the observation between 9:19 A.M. and 9:32 A.M. revealed Laundry Aide #859 verbalized not knowing whether there were any gowns, masks, goggles/face shields, or rubber gloves for handling and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident advance directives matched across paper and electronic medical records (EMR). This affected four residents (#8, #12, #32, #42) of four residents reviewed for advance directives. Facility census was 65.Findings include: 1.Review of Resident #12's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE] and diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, bilateral cataracts, seizures, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of Resident #12's paper medical record on [DATE] revealed a bright yellow sheet indicating he had an advance directive of full code (where a patient has chosen to receive every possible life-saving treatment in the event of a cardiac or respiratory arrest. This means that if a patient's heart stops or they stop breathing, medical professionals will initiate immediate life-saving measures such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)). Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records, facility policies and interviews the facility failed to ensure resident weights were recorded and monitored to ensure nutritional needs were met. This affected four residents (Residents #5, #38, #59, and #63) of five reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 65.Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 12/19/24. Diagnoses included but were not limited to schizoaffective disorder, unspecified dementia, adult failure to thrive, type II diabetes and unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition.Review of the 09/23/25 Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 for Resident #5 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMs) of 8 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #5 was noted to have require supervision with activities of daily living (ADLs) including meals. Resident #5 was noted to be on a physician prescribed weight gain program with a mechanically altered diet.Review of physician orders for Resident #5 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility policy review and facility assessment review, the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing was provided for the memory care unit. This affected 20 residents (Residents #5, #11, #14, #19, #21, #22, #24, #31, #36, #38, #40, #41, #44, #46, #54, #57, #59, #61, #63 and #65) of 20 residents on the memory care unit. The facility census was 65. Findings include:Observation on 12/03/25 at 6:56 A.M. on [NAME] unit (memory care unit) revealed no staff present after completing a tour of the unit. Two residents were observed sitting on chairs sleeping in the common area and another resident was noted sitting in a chair sleeping by herself in the kitchen area. All other residents were observed to be in their rooms in their beds. Interview on 12/03/25 at 7:02 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #817 revealed she was just coming on shift and had not seen any of the night staff walking onto the unit and had not gotten report yet and confirmed staff should have been on the unit.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #15 was offered a care conference meeting quarterly or as needed. This affected one resident (Resident #15) of one reviewed for care conference meetings. The census was 65. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed and admission date of 02/12/25. Diagnoses included acute congestive heart failure, anxiety disorder and pyogenic arthritis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 screen revealed assessments were done on 02/12/25, 02/18/25, 05/21/25, 8/21/25 and 11/20/25. Review of the quarterly MDS Set 3.0 dated 11/20/25 revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of the Care Plan meeting assessments revealed they were dated for 7/23/25, 5/27/25, 3/25/25 and 2/25/25. Review of the 07/23/25 form revealed Resident #15 attended. Interview on 12/03/25 at 4:50 P.M. with Social Service Designee (SSD) #924 verified the facility missed at least one care conference meeting with Resident #15 stating Resident #15's last care conference was 07/21/25. SSD #924 stated she had been covering as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, interview, review of the United States (U.S.) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) latest approved labeling information for Zyprexa, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure antipsychotics were prescribed only as indicated and the resident was monitored appropriately for potential side effects. This affected one Resident (Resident #9) of seven residents who were reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 65. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 09/05/25. Pertinent diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, unspecified dementia, severe, with agitation, mild depressive disorder, single episode, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), altered mental status, and other symbolic dysfunctions (a variety of language and cognitive impairments).Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed on 09/10/25 revealed Resident #9 had severely impaired cognition and mild depression with no behaviors, wandering, or rejection of care. Further review of the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were completed for one resident (Resident #63) of six reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 65.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #63 revealed an admission date of 09/12/25. Diagnoses included but were not limited to dementia with psychotic disturbance, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, paranoid schizophrenic, anxiety disorder, delusional disorders and paranoid personality disorder.Review of the 09/25/25 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 for Resident #63 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMs) score of 13. Review of Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) revealed Resident #63 was noted to require set up for eating and bathing, supervision for toileting, dressing, personal hygiene and transfers.Review of the comprehensive care plan dated 10/15/25 for Resident #63 revealed no evidence of a nutrition care plan or an activities of daily living (ADL) care plan. Phone interview on 12/03/25 at 2:00 P.M. with Registered Dietitian (RD)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interviews, and facility bathing policy, the facility failed to ensure bathing was provided and documented for one independent resident (Resident #61) of three reviewed for bathing. The facility census was 65.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #61 revealed an admission date of 06/13/24. Diagnoses included but were not limited to paranoid schizophrenia, vascular dementia, schizoaffective bipolar type disorder, adult failure to thrive, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, and Alzheimer's dementia. Under the shower task, Resident #61 was scheduled to have Tuesday and Saturday night bathing.Review of the 10/30/25 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 for Resident #61 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMs) of nine which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for Resident #61 revealed resident was independent for bathing.Review of the care plan for Resident #61 revealed it was last reviewed on 10/31/25. Resident #16 was noted to have an ADL self-care performance deficit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interviews, and facility bathing policy, the facility failed to ensure bathing was provided and documented for two dependent residents (Residents #14 and #63) of three reviewed for bathing. The facility census was 65.Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 08/26/23. Diagnoses included but were not limited to vascular dementia, altered mental status transient cerebral ischemic attack, anxiety disorder and unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the shower task revealed showers were scheduled for Sunday and Wednesday night shift.Review of the 11/21/25 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment for Resident #14 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMs) of three which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Resident #14 was noted to be dependent upon staff for bathing.Review of the care plan last for Resident #14 last reviewed on 11/26/25 revealed she required staff assistance with bathing.Observation on 12/01/25 at 11:52 A.M. revealed Resident #14 dressed and sitting with two other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were addressed in a timely manner. This affected two residents (#6 and #10) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Facility census was 65.Findings include: 1.Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/17/23 and diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic kidney disease, depression, anemia, anxiety, heart failure and hypertension. Resident #6 signed on hospice services as of 10/30/25. Review of Resident #6's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #6 was cognitively intact and reported frequent, moderate pain. Resident #6 received hospice services. Review of Resident #6's physician orders as of 12/03/25 revealed an order dated 07/21/25 for diclofenac sodium external gel 1% apply to knees topically every six hours as needed for pain. No dose was specified in the order.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. A total of 28 medications were administered with two errors for a medication error rate of 7.14%. This finding affected two (Residents #11 and #49) of six residents observed for medication administration. Findings include:1. Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including alcohol abuse, depression and anxiety.Review of Resident #11's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited moderate cognitive impairment.Review of Resident #11's physician orders revealed an order dated 11/17/25 for Sertraline (Zoloft) antidepressant, give 75 milligrams (mg) by mouth in the morning for depression.Observation on 11/19/25 at 8:03 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #817 of Resident #11's medication administration revealed two medications were administered with one error. LPN #817 administered 25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods were provided per preference. This affected one resident (#42) of seven residents observed at meals and reviewed for nutrition. Facility census was 65.Findings include:Review of Resident #42's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/24/25 and diagnoses including heart failure, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, Wernicke's encephalopathy and alcohol abuse. Review of Resident #42's medical record as of 12/03/25 revealed a pnysician's order dated 09/24/25 for a regular diet with no lactose and double portions. Review of Resident #42's admission minimum data set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 was cognitively intact and was independent with eating. Review of a nutrition assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 was ordered a regular diet and ate independently. Review of nurses' notes from 09/24/25 through 12/02/25 did not mention food preferences including double portions at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain resident rooms in a safe and sanitary condition. This affected six residents (#18, #20, #22, #24, #55, and #56) of 12 residents observed for environment. The facility census was 56.Findings include:1. Observation on 09/23/25 at 12:08 P.M. of Resident #18 room revealed numerous stains on carpet. Observation and interview on 09/24/25 at 8:19 A.M. with Administrator confirmed above observations.2. Observation on 09/23/25 at 12:33 P.M. of Resident #20 room revealed a strong odor, the toilet was dirty and a bed pan was on the floor with brown stains. Resident's wheelchair was in bathroom with opened boxes of medical equipment placed on top and other various items including a brief.Observation and interview on 09/23/25 at 12:44 P.M. with CNA #354 confirmed the observations.3. Observation on 09/23/25 at 4:37 P.M. of Resident #24 room revealed a chair with numerous stains, floor boards and walls were dirty and dusty, the floor was extremely sticky, various debris on floor, brown stain around the toilet rim, the walls in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-19 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations and interview, the facility failed to provide therapeutic activities in the secured memory care unit to meet the physical, mental and pscyho-social wellbeing of the residents. This affected all 18 residents in the memory care unit. The facility census was 56. Findings include:Observations throughout investigation from 09/23/25 through 10/21/25 on the memory unit revealed activities on the memory care unit not being done as scheduled with memory care residents sitting in common areas with one television on. There was one activity board in the common area but residents were not observed using it. The large common area had multiple single chairs arranged in front of the walls but the space was so large residents could not converse with each other if sitting across from each other. There was a television in the large common area that was never on and only observed the television on in the smaller sitting area. Observation of bingo, magician and musician activities off the memory care unit revealed some memory care residents were taken to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled, unexpired, and stored in an appropriate manner. This had the potential to affect all residents served from two of two storage rooms, two of two treatment carts, and two of three medication carts available for medication storage in the facility.Findings include:1.Observation of the facility medication storage rooms and [NAME] Unit treatment cart on 09/30/25 at 9:51 A.M. to 10:27 A.M. with the Assistant Director of Nursing revealed the following:The medication storage room in the [NAME] Unit contained (1) bottle of Children's Flonase 0.38fl oz expired on 04/2025 and (4) Zyno Medical administration sets (tubing used for intravenous (IV) medication) expired on 01/25/25.The [NAME] treatment cart contained (15) packets Procure triple antibiotic ointment 0.9 grams and an opened (1) DermaRite 4x4 xeroform gauze (medicated gauze used in wound treatment).The medication storage room in the Cascade Unit contained…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and facility policy, the facility failed to provide food at appetizing temperatures. This had the potential to affect 55 of 56 residents as the facility identified Resident #17 as receiving no food by mouth. Facility census was 56.Findings include:Review of Resident Council dated 06/26/25 revealed complaint that Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) are only passing their assigned resident trays which results in food sitting for a long time. There was no evidence of the resolution to the council minutes following the June 2025 meeting.Interview on 09/24/25 at 3:32 P.M. with Resident #56 revealed she usually eats meals in her room and food is not always warm.Interview on 09/24/25 at 9:30 A.M. with Resident #55 revealed the dining room is not open so he usually eats in his room and the food is sometimes not warm.A test tray was plated on 09/23/25 at 6:13 P.M. and arrived on the Buckeye Hall at 6:17 P.M. Test tray was completed at 6:34 P.M., after all room trays were served. The food was not at the appropriate temperature. The pasta was 122.4 degrees…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control procedures were followed. This affected three residents (Resident #18 Resident #20, and Resident #52) out of three residents reviewed for infection control procedures. The facility census was 56.1.Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/01/21. Diagnoses included dementia, dysphagia, psoriatic arthritis, essential hypertension, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, anxiety and colostomy. Review of Resident #20's physician order dated 12/16/24 for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) revealed orders for protective personal equipment (PPE): gloves/gown during high-contact resident care activities. Review of Resident #20 Care Plan dated 04/22/25 revealed resident was at risk for malnutrition and weight loss and required the use of an ostomy. Review of Resident #20 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident required setup or clean-up assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident and staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate nutritional and communication assistance. This affected one Resident (#20) of three reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). The facility census was 56.Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/01/21. Diagnoses included dementia, dysphagia, psoriatic arthritis, essential hypertension, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, anxiety and colostomy.Review of Resident #20 Care Plan dated 04/22/25 revealed resident was at risk for malnutrition and weight loss and required interventions including providing assistance with all meals, snacks and supplements. Resident had a communication impairment with interventions that included using communication tools, terms, gestures the resident can understand.Review of Resident #20 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident required setup or clean-up…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #55 blood sugar was monitored appropriately. This affected one resident (Resident #55) of three residents reviewed for quality of care. Facility census was 56. Resident #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including heart failure, type 2 diabetes, atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rhythm), and low back pain. Resident #55 had an order dated 06/20/25 for a Dexcom G7 Sensor (a wearable continuous blood sugar monitor) for blood sugars every ten days. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 08/01/2025 to 08/31/25 revealed on 08/20/25 Resident #55 did not receive the Dexcom G7 Sensor due to being out of the facility without medications and on 08/30/25 nothing was indicated on the MAR; the entry was blank. Review of the MAR for 09/01/25 to 09/30/25 revealed on 09/09/25 and 09/29/25 Resident #55 did not receive the Dexcom G7 Sensor. Resident #55 was not administered the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #22 received treatment to maintain vision. This affected one resident (Resident #22) of three residents reviewed for vision. The facility census was 56. Review of Resident #22's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic diastolic heart failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, asthma, insomnia, major depressive disorder, dry eyes syndrome of bilateral lacrimal glands and bilateral combined forms of age-related cataract.Review of an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed on 08/01/25 revealed Resident #22 was alert and oriented with intact cognition. Further review revealed Resident #22 vision was severely impaired.Record review revealed Resident #22 was seen by the eye care consultant on 03/18/25 and recommended following up with ophthalmologist of facility choice for cataract evaluation.Interview on 09/24/25 at 3:57 P.M. with Resident #22 revealed she is unable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #44 was free from significant medication error. This affected one resident (Resident #44) of three residents reviewed for medications. Findings include:Review of Resident #44's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, seizures, essential hypertension, major depressive disorder, localization-related symptomatic epilepsy and epileptic syndrome with complex partial seizers.Review of the physician order dated 10/30/24 with a revised date of 08/04/25 revealed Resident #44 was prescribed Valtoco 10 milligrams (mg) 1 spray alternating nostrils every 24 hours as needed for seizures.Review of the nurse progress note dated 08/04/25 revealed nurse spoke to Nurse Practitioner (NP) to get a new prescription for the Valtoco seizure medications.Review of the nurse progress notes dated 09/11/25 revealed Resident #44 had a seizure. Nurse notified NP, received an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. This affected one resident (#112) out of three residents reviewed for insulin administration. The facility identifieid ten residents who required insulin. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of Resident #112's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/22/21 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, heart failure, type two diabetes mellitus, and protein calorie malnutrition.Review of Resident #112's care plan revised on 08/16/21 revealed the resident was at risk for hypoglycemic (low blood sugar) and hyperglycemic (elevated blood sugar) episodes related to diabetes. Listed interventions included to monitor blood sugar levels as ordered, monitor for signs and symptoms of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia, and to administer insulin as ordered. Review of Resident #112's physician orders revealed an order dated 06/18/25 for Novolog…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-09 · tag F0813 — pattern
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure resident refrigerators were monitored for sanitary conditions and that food was maintained at temperatures safe for consumption. This affected 17 (#6, #8, #9, #12, #13, #17, #19, #20, #25, #29, #30, #31, #32, #36, #40, #41 and #45) of 17 residents identified by the facility as having personal refrigerators. The facility census was 49.Findings include: Interview on 07/08/25 at 10:50 A.M. with Resident #12, revealed he was concerned about his refrigerator being safe and the floor surrounding the refrigerator area having a red dried substance. Observation of Resident #12's refrigerator revealed a red, dried substance on the bottom shelf. The thermometer in the refrigerator showed a temperature of 50 degrees Fahrenheit (F). There was food in the refrigerator. Further observation revealed a refrigerator temperature monitoring log for June 2025 hanging on the outside of the refrigerator that had only been completed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 10/24/19. Diagnoses included weakness, gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, vitamin D deficiency, and age-related osteoporosis without current pathological fracture. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 had intact cognition. Observation on 06/09/25 at 10:35 A.M. in the Resident #9's room revealed an opened store brand bottle of an antacid chewable, with more than 50% gone, sitting on the resident's bedside table. Interview at this time, Resident #9 stated she had a friend bring it in for her. Resident #9 stated they don't have it here and were too busy with other residents. Observation on 06/11/25 at 4:53 P.M. in Resident #9's room the bottle of store brand antacid was no longer on the bedside table. Interview at this time with Resident #9 revealed she still had them but had put the bottle in drawer of her nightstand next to her bed. Observed Resident #9 open the second drawer of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for all residents. This affected one resident (Resident #29) of three residents reviewed for environment on the Cascade unit, and had the potential to affect an additional 35 residents (Resident #1, #2, #5, #6, #8, #10, #11, #12, #13, #15, #17, #18, #21, #22, #23, #24, #26, #28, #30, #31, #34, #36, #37, #38, #40, #41, #42, #43, #45, #48, #49, #50, #33, #19,and #32) the facility identified as living on the Buckeye and Memory Care (MC) units. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Record review of the Resident Council Meeting Minutes dated 02/05/25 revealed residents had concerns staff were not making beds or changing sheets, not emptying trash cans or putting bags in the trash cans. Record review of Resident Council Meeting Minutes dated 03/26/25 revealed a concern regarding rooms needing swept more than once a week. Review of the facility cleaning checklist revealed bathrooms were to be swept, and bedrooms were to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene and implemented proper glove use during medication administration for Resident #6, Resident #13, and Resident #22, and failed to disinfect the glucometer after using it to check Resident #13's blood sugar. This affected three residents (#6, #13 and #22) out of six residents reviewed for medication administration. In addition, the facility failed to ensure staff donned appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) during wound care for Resident #47. This affected one resident (Resident #47) out of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 51 Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 04/21/21 with diagnoses including hypertensive heart disease, bipolar disorder, hypothyroidism, benign prostatic hyperplasia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, vitamin D deficiency, chronic pain syndrome, restless leg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of facility policy, the facility did not ensure facility staff did not neglect Resident #5 when in need of staff assistance to meet care needs. This affected one resident (Resident #5) of three residents reviewed for abuse/neglect. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Record review for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 06/01/22 and a readmission date of 01/10/25 with diagnoses including heart failure, cardiomegaly (enlarged heart) with atheroscerotic heart disease, , atrial fibrillation (heart arrhythmia), osteoarthritis, diabetes mellitus, palpitations, insomnia, chronic embolism and thrombosis of unspecified vein and hypokalemia (low potassium level). A review of Resident #5's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #5 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Record review of Resident #5's plan of care initiated on 06/02/2022 revealed Resident #5 had an alteration in elimination related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of facility policy, the facility did not ensure an allegation of neglect of Resident #5 was reported to the state agency and administrator as required. This affected one resident (Resident #5) of three residents reviewed for abuse/neglect. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 06/01/22 and a readmission date of 01/10/25 with diagnoses including heart failure, cardiomegaly (enlarged heart)with atheroscerotic heart disease, , atrial fibrillation (heart arrhythmia), osteoarthritis, diabetes mellitus, palpitations, insomnia, chronic embolism and thrombosis of unspecified vein and hypokalemia (low potassium level). A review of Resident #5's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #5 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of Resident #5's plan of care initiated on 06/02/2022 revealed Resident #5 had an alteration in elimination…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of facility policy, the facility did not ensure an allegation of neglect of Resident #5 was thoroughly investigated and corrective action taken as required. This affected one resident (Resident #5) of three residents reviewed for abuse/neglect. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 06/01/22 and a readmission date of 01/10/25 with diagnoses including heart failure, cardiomegaly (enlarged heart)with atheroscerotic heart disease, , atrial fibrillation (heart arrhythmia), osteoarthritis, diabetes mellitus, palpitations, insomnia, chronic embolism and thrombosis of unspecified vein and hypokalemia (low potassium level). A review of Resident #5's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #5 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of Resident #5's plan of care initiated on 06/02/2022 revealed Resident #5 had an alteration in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure staff provided the physician ordered wound treatment during Resident #47's wound treatment procedure. This affected one resident (Resident #47) out of three residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 01/13/23 with diagnoses including bullous penphigoid (a rare autoimmune disease that causes blisters or sores on the skin.), morbid obesity, anxiety, depression, insomnia, lymphedema, adult failure to thrive and high blood pressure. Review of a wound assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #47 revealed Resident #47 had severe edema of the lower extremities, and multiple sores and blisters on the thighs, abdominal fold, buttocks, and back. Resident #47's physician order dated 06/25/24 indicated to implement enhanced barrier isolation precautions during resident care tasks. Resident #47 had a stage three pressure ulcer located on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the staff administered medications with a less than five percent error rate. Three errors occurred within 24 opportunities for error resulting in a medication error rate of 12.5 percent. This affected two residents (Resident #13 and Resident #28) out of six resident observed for medication administration. The facility census was 51. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an admission date of 01/21/25 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory disease including respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypercapnea, hypoxia, high cholesterol, atherosclerotic heart disease, anemia, psychoactive substance abuse, cocaine/cannabis abuse, alcohol abuse, hemophilus influenza and insomnia. A review of Resident #28's physician order dated 04/10/25 indicated to administer 25 milligrams (mg) of metoprolol tartrate orally twice a day. An observation on 04/14/25 at 7:58 A.M. of Registered Nurse (RN) #61 administering medications to Resident #28 revealed RN #61…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility did not ensure food served to Resident #5, #46 and #47 was palatable and attractive. This affected three residents (#5, #46 and #47) of seven residents reviewed for food and nutrition. The facility census was 51. Findings include: An interview was conducted on 04/14/25 at 9:20 A.M. with Resident #47 who revealed she did not like the taste of the facility food. An observation was conducted on 04/14/25 from 12:45 P.M. to 12:57 P.M. of the kitchen tray line for the lunch meal. [NAME] # 112 had placed a shallow pan of meatloaf on the trayline for the meal service. The meatloaf had burnt edges and [NAME] #112 needed to scrape between the pan and the burnt edges of the meatloaf in order to release pieces of meatloaf. Observation of the mashed potatoes on tray line revealed the mashed potatoes were so runny/watery [NAME] #112 had to serve them with a serving spoon instead of a measured scoop. In addition, [NAME] #112 was serving rice that had a clumped, ball-like shape when scooped onto the plate. [NAME] #112 verified the findings at the time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the diet order report, and interview, the facility failed to serve food at an appetizing taste and temperature. This had the potential to affect all 59 residents who received meals from the kitchen. The census was 59. Findings include: Observation on 02/04/25 at 1:19 P.M. revealed [NAME] #3 served a test tray consisting of a lemon pepper chicken breast, white rice and cooked peas and carrots from the kitchen tray line and placed the meal tray within the meal cart. At 1:23 P.M., the meal cart was delivered to [NAME] Hills unit (secured memory care unit). At 1:28 P.M., the nursing staff began serving residents meals within the dining room on the secured memory unit. At 1:39 P.M., all residents had been served their lunch tray, and the test tray was tested. Registered Dietitian (RD) #14 used a facility thermometer to take the temperature of the food while the surveyor taste tested the food. RD #14 confirmed the following temperatures: 93.5 degrees Fahrenheit (F) for the chicken…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of the food temperature log, review of the FoodSafety.gov website, review of the diet order report, policy review and interview, the facility failed to store and prepare food in a sanitary manner. This affected all 59 residents who received meals from the kitchen. The census was 59. Findings include: Observation on 02/04/25 at 7:55 A.M. during the initial tour of the kitchen revealed the tiled floor was black and sticky in the kitchen servery and in the kitchen. There were no paper towels in the paper towel dispenser at the handwashing sink in the dish machine room. There was a food temperature log dated the First Week of February hanging on the bulletin board outside of Dietary Manager (DM) #4's office within the kitchen. There was a cardboard box full of four-ounce milk cartons sitting on the floor, an opened plastic bag of hot dogs in a metal pan without a date, and four slices of what appeared to be pie covered with plastic wrap without a date sitting on a tray on a metal food cart within Fridge #1 which was the walk-in refrigerator. At 8:15 A.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-11 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the observation, review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) 802 Matrix form, review of the nursing staff assignment sheets, review of the education in-service attendance record, and interview, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff to provide appropriate supervision to residents residing on the secured memory care unit. This affected 19 residents (Resident #29, #53, #48, #12, #34, #30, #56, #38, #16, #44, #17, #58, #9, #42, #19, #2, #13, #45 and #20) who resided on the [NAME] Hills unit (the secured memory care unit). Facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of the Daily Assignment Sheet [for nursing staff] dated 01/23/25 revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #9 and Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #21 were assigned to [NAME] Hills unit (secured memory care unit) from 7:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M. and CNA #8 was assigned to [NAME] Hills unit from 7:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M. Review of the Education In-Service Attendance Record dated 01/23/25 timed 7:00 A.M. and 2:30 P.M. revealed RN #9, CNA #21…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-11 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — pattern
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure all residents in the memory care unit received appropriate dementia care and services. This affected three of three residents (Residents #9, #58 and #12) reviewed for dementia care and had the potential to affect 19 (Resident #29, #53, #48, #12, #34, #30, #56, #38, #16, #44, #17, #58, #9, #42, #19, #2, #13, #45 and #20) residents residing in the memory care unit. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #58 was admitted on [DATE]. Resident #58's date of birth was 01/06/66 and he had diagnoses including cognitive communication deficit, restlessness, agitation, insomnia, hepatic encephalopathy (loss of brain function when a damaged liver does not remove toxins from the blood), alcohol dependence and homelessness on admit. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an initiation date of 01/22/25 revealed Resident #58 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating he was cognitively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-11 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of diet order report, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to follow the menu to ensure nutritional adequacy. This affected 12 residents (Residents #1, #3, #9, #15, #19, #24, #25, #41, #42, #48, #51, and #53) who were ordered a mechanical soft diet or a pureed diet. The census was 59. Findings include: Review of the of Week One 2024-2025 for Tuesday [02/04/25] Menu Spreadsheet revealed residents ordered a pureed diet were supposed to receive pureed scrambled eggs, pureed toast and six ounces of pureed hot or cold cereal with beverages for breakfast. Residents ordered a mechanical soft diet were supposed to receive three ounces of ground lemon pepper chicken for lunch. Residents ordered a pureed diet were supposed to receive three ounces of pureed lemon pepper chicken, four ounces of pureed fluffy steamed rice, four ounces of peas and carrots and two ounces of pureed dinner roll for lunch. The menu was signed by a Registered Dietitian (RD). Observation on 02/04/25 at 8:54 A.M. of [NAME] #3 serving breakfast from the steam table in the kitchen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-11 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) COVID-19 vaccination guidelines, policy review and interview, the facility failed to offer any 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccinations to residents. This affected five (Residents #9, #43, #38, #17 and #34) residents reviewed for COVID-19 vaccination. The census was 59. Findings include: Review of the CDC's Interim Clinical Considerations for COVID-19 Vaccines in the United States dated 01/31/25 revealed people ages 65 and older, vaccinated under the routine schedule, were recommended to receive two doses of any 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccine separated by six months (minimum interval two months) regardless of vaccination history with one exception: unvaccinated people who initiated vaccination with 2024-2025 Novavax COVID-19 vaccine were recommended to receive two doses of Novavax followed by a third dose of any COVID-19 vaccine six months (minimum interval two months) later. Review of the facility's COVID-19 policy revised April…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-23 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, review of nursing schedules, review of Self-Reported Incidents (SRI), review of personnel files, review of concern logs, review of resident council minutes, and review of the facility assessment, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to meet the total care needs of the residents and failed to provide adequate nursing coverage on each shift. This had the potential to affect all 59 resident in the facility. The facility census was 59. Findings include: 1. Review of an SRI, dated 09/17/24, revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #600 was found to be sleeping in an empty resident bed and had eaten several bags of snacks and chips. Resident #4 stated an STNA (State Tested Nursing Assistant) came into her room, pulled the privacy curtain and pulled her blind down. CNA #600 then proceeded to lay down in the bed, the other bed in her room (bed B), and ate and drank all night. Resident #4 stated I could hear her crunching all night. CNA #600 was suspended pending the investigation. Review of CNA #600's personnel file revealed she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-23 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, job description review, review of resident diet order list, and review of personnel files, the facility failed to ensure adequate and appropriate dietary staff to meet the dietary needs of the residents. This had the potential to affect all residents except one resident (#45) who received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Interview on 12/16/24 at 9:00 A.M. with Resident #21 revealed his breakfast meal had not arrived, and he was hungry. Resident #21 revealed his breakfast, lunch, and dinner meal were late daily. Interview and observation on 12/16/24 at 9:10 A.M. with Resident #11 revealed she had not received her breakfast meal. Resident #11 revealed all her meals arrived late every day. Resident #11 revealed her lunch always arrived after 2:30 P.M. and her dinner always arrived after 6:30 P.M. Review of the mealtimes revealed for lunch dining room opened at 11:15 A.M. The tray line began at 12:00 P.M., the [NAME] unit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, resident interviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary kitchen. This had the potential to affect all residents except one resident (#45) who received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 59. Findings include: 1. Observations during the tour of the kitchen on 12/16/24 from 9:33 A.M. to 9:56 A.M., with the Administrator revealed: observed in the walk-in cooler the two light fixtures were heavily dusty, there was a black substance on the ceiling near the fans and on the silver parts around the fan. There was also a black substance/spots on the wall around the door that led to the walk-in freezer; observed on a clean rack on the bottom shelf was a black bucket with plastic cups that were clear colored but were very cloudy. There was a four slotted silverware container with spoons in two of the slots that had water spots and the other two slots were empty with crumbs; the dry storage room floor entry way was heavily soiled; observed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-23 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interviews, family interviews, staff interviews, review of resident council minutes, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a clean, functional and sanitary environment. This had the potential to affect all 59 residents. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Observation on 12/16/24 at 9:00 A.M of Resident #21 over the bed light revealed a light that was unable to be turned on due to no string or pull cord to operate it. Interview on 12/16/24 at 9:00 A.M., with Resident #21 revealed the light above his bed had not been in working order for 8 weeks and no one would fix it due to electricity concerns and/or hazards. Interview on 12/16/24 at 9:03 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #303 revealed housekeeping did not clean the resident rooms or common areas often. LPN #303 revealed housekeeping staff typically swept and mopped the areas that were visible from the hallways. Interview and observation on 12/16/24 at 9:10 A.M., with Resident #11 revealed housekeeping…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-23 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record reviews, observations, review of self-reported incident, review of resident concern log, review of resident council minutes, policy review, resident interview, ombudsman interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to timely and fully address residents expressed concerns with care and treatment and environmental issues. This directly affected eighteen Residents (#9, #10, #11, #19, #27, #30, #31, #32, #40, #47, #48, #49, #52, #54, #55, #56, #58, and #62), with the potential to affect all resident residing on the 300 hall. The census was 59. Findings include: On 12/17/24 from 1:45 P.M. to 2:10 P.M. a resident meeting was held with Resident #32, Resident #40, Resident #47 and Resident #62 attending. The residents revealed concerns with the facility's lack of response to expressed concerns. The residents stated they consistently had issues with call light response times, dietary issues, missing laundry and the turnover of staff. Resident #32 had an issue with his light not working and reported it weeks prior. Resident #40 had voiced concerns about the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure potentially hazardous chemicals and medicated treatments were kept in a secured area where residents residing in the Memory Care Unit did not have access. This had the potential to affect 14 (#1, #7, #12, #15, #16, #35, #37, #43, #44, #50, #52, #57, #59, and #60) who were identified by the facility as being independently mobile of the 17 residents residing in the Memory Care Unit. In addition, the facility failed to ensure a resident at risk for choking was supervised and monitored during meals. This affected one (#50) of ten residents observed for dining in the memory care unit. The facility census was 59. Findings include: 1. Observation on 12/16/24 at 12:39 P.M. of the Memory Care Unit revealed a large dining area. Next to the dining area was an open kitchenette area with multiple kitchen cabinets. Observation revealed none of the cabinets were secured. Residents were observed sitting in the dining area and wandering…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in a secure manner. This affected six (#4, #25, #27, #40, #41, and #60) and had the potential to affect 19 additional residents (#1, #3, #7, #12, #15, #16, #17, #21, #26, #29, #35, #37, #43, #44, #49, #50, #52, #57, and #59) identified by the facility as being cognitively impaired and independently mobile. The facility census was 40. Findings include: 1. Observation on 12/16/24 at 9:20 A.M., revealed 11 pills left unattended in a medication cup at the bedside table for Resident #41. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #462 was present providing incontinence care for Resident #41. Interview and observation on 12/16/24 at 9:24 A.M., with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #463 confirmed the 11 pills were left unattended in a medication cup at the bedside table for Resident #41 and confirmed the medications were not administered to Resident #41 per the physician orders. 2. Observation on 12/16/24 at 9:36 A.M., revealed four pills in a medication cup left unattended at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, review of resident diet order list and policy review, the facility did not ensure food was held at appropriate temperatures while on the steam table and served at palatable temperatures. This affected seven residents on pureed (#13, #36 #52) and/or mechanical soft (#4, #15, #19, #50) diets respectively. Additionally, interviews with four residents (#11, #19, #33, #40) voiced concerns that the food was served cold. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Interviews on 12/16/24 from 9:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M. with Residents #11, #19, #33, and #40 stated the food was served cold. Observation on 12/19/24 at 11:38 A.M., Dietary [NAME] (DC) #407 washed his hands and then obtained food temperatures of the food on the steam table for tray line meal service. Continuous observation revealed the temperature of the ground baked ziti was 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F), pureed baked ziti was 120 degrees F, and the pureed beets were 130 degrees F. Concurrent interview with DC #407 verified the temperatures and stated the items would heat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident record review, resident interview, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed and implemented. This affected two (#46 and #62) of six residents reviewed for physician orders. The facility census was 59. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 11/10/21. Diagnoses included dementia, anxiety disorder, Alzheimer's disease, muscle weakness, and difficulty walking. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition and required substantial to maximum assistance from staff for transfers. Review of the physician orders for December 2024 revealed active orders to encourage the resident to elevate feet throughout day for every shift for bilateral edema to feet. Interview on 12/16/24 at 1:44 P.M., with Resident #46's family member revealed the resident was recently started on a blood thinner for a blood clot…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered pressure relieving devices were in place to prevent pressure ulcers. This affected one (#21) of two residents reviewed for pressure sores. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of Resident #21's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/18/22 and re-admission date of 11/19/24, with diagnoses including: displaced fracture of the neck of the right femur, muscle weakness, and aftercare following joint replacement surgery. Review of the 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 was alert with cognition impairment. Review of the MDS assessment revealed Resident #21 was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the care plan dated 12/09/24 revealed Resident #21 had a fracture and was at risk for increased pain, limited ambulation, and further injury related to a right femur fracture. Interventions included abductor pillow to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-23 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure foot care was provided as needed. This affected two (#15 and #41) of two residents reviewed for non-pressure wounds. The facility census was 59. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #41's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/25/20. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus, idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy, cellulitis of unspecified part of limb, and erythema intertrigo. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #41 was dependent for dressing, toilet use, transferring, putting on and taking off footwear and was unable to walk. Resident #41 had no skin ulcers, wounds, or other skin problems identified at the time of the assessment. Review of the care plan dated 02/24/23 revealed Resident #41 had diabetes mellitus and was at risk for diabetic related complications. Interventions included to use a draw…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-23 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited range of motion from a fractured hip was provided with positioning device to prevent dislocation of hip. This affected one (#21) of six residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of Resident #21's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/18/22 and re-admission date of 11/19/24, with diagnoses including: displaced fracture of the neck of the right femur, muscle weakness, and aftercare following joint replacement surgery. Review of the 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 was alert with cognition impairment. Resident #21 was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the care plan dated 12/09/24 revealed Resident #21 had a fracture and was at risk for increased pain, limited ambulation, and further injury related to a right femur fracture. Interventions included abductor pillow to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and review of manufacturer's guidelines, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed five percent (%). The facility had three medication errors of 25 opportunities for an error rate of 12%. This affected two (#31 and #32) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 59 residents. Findings include: 1. Review for Resident #31's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/18/20. Diagnoses included muscle wasting, hypocalcemia, and [NAME] syndrome (an immune system illness). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 was cognitively intact. Review of the care plan dated 01/06/23 revealed Resident #31 was at risk for constipation related to decreased mobility and medication use. Interventions included to administer medications as ordered. Review of the physician orders for Resident #31 for December 2024 revealed an order for Miralax oral powder 17…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-23 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, medical record review, policy review, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to arrange an Maxillary Oral Surgeon consult as ordered. This affected one (#2) of one resident reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 59. Findings included: Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/07/22, with diagnoses including: unspecified dementia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and hypertensive heart disease without heart failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 10/07/24 revealed Resident #2 had no broken or loosely fitting full or partial dentures or mouth or facial pain, discomfort or difficulty chewing. Review of care plan initiated on 10/02/18, revealed Resident #2 had potential for dental concerns and was at risk for increased pain and infections as evidenced by own teeth, poor dentition, and rejections of assistance with oral hygiene. Interventions included observe for pain, excessive bleeding, et cetera (etc) and report to physician (MD), observe for signs and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, record review, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation reflecting care and treatment provided. This affected two (#15 and #62) of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 59. Findings include: 1. Review for Resident #62's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/07/24. Diagnoses included cutaneous abscess of perineum, rectal abscess, Crohn's disease, and rectal fistula. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 was cognitively intact. Resident #62 had medically complex conditions including ulcerative colitis, Crohn's, and inflammatory bowel disease. Resident #62 received antibiotics and received intravenous (IV) medication. Review of the care plan for Resident #62 dated 10/23/24 revealed the resident was on IV - peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) antibiotics related to peritoneal abscess. Interventions included to observe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and review of policies, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were maintained during a sterile peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line dressing change. This affected one (#62) of one resident reviewed for infection control with intravenous access care. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review for Resident #62's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/07/24. Diagnoses included cutaneous abscess of perineum, rectal abscess, Crohn's disease, and rectal fistula. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 was cognitively intact. Resident #62 had medically complex conditions including ulcerative colitis, Crohn's', and inflammatory bowel disease. Resident #62 received antibiotics and received IV medication. Review of the care plan for Resident #62 dated 10/07/24 revealed Resident #62 was to be on Enhanced Barrier Precautions as evidence by a peripherally inserted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were answered in a timely manner and failed to promptly address resident needs. This affected one resident (#14) of three residents reviewed for call light response and had the potential to affect all 60 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed and admission date of 03/08/24. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure (CHF), muscle weakness, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), depression, and hypertension. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 was cognitively intact. She was dependent on staff for toileting, showering and dressing, required partial to moderate assistance for personal hygiene and set-up or clean-up assistance for eating and oral hygiene. Review of the care plan dated 03/14/24 revealed Resident #14 had a self-care deficit due to fatigue, CHF,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-01-30 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespread
    Hire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to employ a full-time licensed social worker (LSW) as required. This had the potential to affect all 68 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of the employee list provided by the facility revealed no LSW listed as being employed at the facility. Interview on 01/29/24 at 9:48 A.M. with the Administrator revealed the facility did not have a full-time social worker. Interview on 01/29/24 at 10:36 A.M. with the Regional Director of Operations (RDO) #200 confirmed the facility was certified and licensed for 122 beds. She confirmed the facility did not currently have a full-time LSW. This deficiency represents noncompliance investigated under Master Complaint Number OH00150251.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-30 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure residents and/or their representatives were invited to participate in care conferences as required. This affected three residents (#7, #36, and #43) of three residents reviewed for participation in care planning. The facility census was 68. Findings include: 1. Review the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 2/24/21. Diagnoses Included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, depression, dementia, and anxiety. The resident had a legal guardian. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 was cognitively intact. He required supervision for showering or bathing and hygiene, set up help for eating, oral hygiene and was independent in toileting. Review of the medical record review the care conference was held for Resident #7 on 01/26/23. Those in attendance included the social worker, activities, and nursing administration. There was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure care conferences were completed as required. This finding affected three residents (#7, #36 and #43) of three residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 68. Findings include: 1. Review the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 02/24/21. Diagnoses Included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, depression, dementia, and anxiety. The resident had a legal guardian. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment date 01/13/24 revealed Resident #7 was cognitively intact. He required supervision for showering or bathing and hygiene, set up help for eating, oral hygiene, and was independent in toileting. Review of the medical record review the care conference was held for Resident #7 on 01/26/23. Those in attendance included the social worker, activities, and nursing administration. There was no documented evidence in the medical record that the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-12-08 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement their abuse prevention policy and procedure to ensure new staff were checked on the Nurse Aide Registry as required. This has the potential to affect all 65 residents in the facility.Findings include: Review of the personnel file for Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant (COTA) #836 revealed a start date of 11/17/25. There was no evidence of search results from the Nurse Aide Registry (NAR). Review of the personnel file for Dietary Manager #820 revealed a start dated of 11/11/25. There was no evidence of search results from the NAR.Review of the personnel file for Director of Nursing (DON) revealed a start date of 08/18/25. There was no evidence of search results from NAR.Review of the personnel file for Licensed Practical Nurse #803 revealed a start date of 09/16/25. There was no evidence of search results from NAR.Interview on 12/02/25 at 2:12 P.M. with DON verified the personnel records did not contain evidence of NARs for above staff. Review of the policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation (ANE)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-12-08 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete employee physical screenings prior to employment. This had the potential to affect all 65 residents at the facility. Findings include:Review of the personnel file for Director of Nursing revealed a hire date of 08/18/25. The physical was not signed or dated by appropriate personnel.Review of the personnel file for Licensed Practical Nurse #803 revealed a hired date of 09/16/25. The physical was not signed or dated by appropriate personnel.Review of the personnel file for CNA #816 revealed a hire date of 09/19/25. The physical was not signed or dated by appropriate personnel. Review of the personnel file for Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #912 revealed a hire date of 11/11/25. The physical was not signed or dated by appropriate personnel.Review of the personnel file for Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant revealed a hire date of 11/11/25. The physical was not signed or dated by appropriate personnel.Review of the personnel file for Dietary Manager #820 revealed a hire date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-12-08 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, facility policy and assessment review, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment was comprehensive as required. This had the potential to affect all residents residing at the facility. The facility census was 65.Findings include:Review of the facility assessment dated [DATE] revealed under the acuity section different examples of care areas were listed but was not differentiated by units. Under the services provided sections various general care areas were listed but were not differentiated by units. Review of the Full Time Employees (FTEs)/Contractors required section revealed seven FTEs for Registered Nurses, 16 FTEs for Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) and 33 FTEs for Certified Nursing Aides (CNAs). It did not specify how many FTEs per shift or how many of each staff type per unit. Under the staff considerations by unit section, it listed day shift is typically staff with charge nurse and a CNA coverage. Staffing levels may vary based on patient acuity, census and staffing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-01-30 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure posted nursing staff information was posted daily as required. This had the potential to affect all 68 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observation of the posted nursing staff information on 01/29/24 at 7:24 A.M. revealed the information posted was dated 01/26/24. Interview at the time of the observation with Business Office Manager #204 confirmed the required daily nursing staffing information had not been posted since 01/26/24 and should be updated daily. This deficiency represents noncompliance investigated under Master Complaint Number OH00150251.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$178,725 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 4 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $25,688 — penalty dated 2025-11-19
  • $126,272 — penalty dated 2025-04-21
  • $7,878 — penalty dated 2024-12-23
  • $18,887 — penalty dated 2024-07-18
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-01-03 for 31 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-07-12 for 53 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-01-23 for 36 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-15 for 13 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CUYAHOGA OPERATOR HOLDCO, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/28/2022
ELAINE ROTHNER LEGACY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 07/28/2022
MOZART REALTY VENTURES LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST33%since 07/28/2022
MIRETZKY, STEVENIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/28/2022
ROTHNER, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/28/2022
WEISZ, MORDECHAIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/28/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-26.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 18%Medicare 3%Other / private 79%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$341per resident / day
operating cost
$10,369per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$271per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365826. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next