Shady Lawn Nursing Home
15028 Old Lincolnway East, Dalton, OH 44618 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 98 certified beds · (330) 828-2278 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602, F0606) — most recent May 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $40,950 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-12)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.4% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.3% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.2% | 0.4% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 13.5% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.5% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.9% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 29.5% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.3% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.5% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.4% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 20.6% | 8.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.6% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 57.1% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
42.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 42.6%CMS range 25.7–58.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.7%CMS range 8.0–16.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.96 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 98 beds and averages 74.3 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.49 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.79 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-05-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, hospital record review, death certificate review, investigation review, drug information review, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure staff belongings were properly secured to prevent access to Resident #11 and failed to ensure a condition change was timely reported to medical practitioners resulting in resident neglect. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and Actual Harm/subsequent death on [DATE] between 5:00 A.M. and 6:00 A.M. when Resident #11, who resided on a secured behavior unit and had a history of drug use and drug seeking behavior, accessed Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #120's purse (which was located at an unsecured nursing station) and obtained the prescription medication, Adipex (a stimulant). Resident #11 then ingested up to 20 37.5 milligram (mg) tablets that had been in the bottle without staff knowledge. At 7:40 A.M. Resident #11 was noted to be not acting right and at 8:56 A.M. Resident #11 developed a rapid pulse and confusion.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to timely identify and obtain medical intervention for Resident #77 following an acute change in condition. Actual harm occurred when the facility failed to provide timely intervention for Resident #77 following an acute change in condition. On 02/20/25 Resident #77, who had a physician order for comfort measures in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest, was noted to have emesis, decreased fluid intake and adventitious lung sounds with no evidence the physician or family were notified or effective interventions initiated. On 02/21/25 at 1:07 A.M. Resident #77 developed a labored breathing with an increased respiratory rate of 39 breaths per minute (normal 16-20 breaths per minute), an oxygen saturation of 60% (normal 95 to 100%) while on oxygen, no obtainable blood pressure and a heart rate of 39 (normal between 60 and 100) beats per minute without medical practitioner notification for further intervention or additional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-05-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, effective and individualized resident centered pressure ulcer prevention and treatment program for Resident #46, Resident #48 and Resident #58 to prevent the development of pressure ulcers, to ensure treatments were completed as ordered and to promote timely and optimal healing of pressure ulcers. Actual Harm occurred on 05/06/25 when Resident #48, who was dependent on staff for bed mobility and toileting, and always incontinent of bowel and bladder, was assessed to have a dark purple, non-blanchable suspected deep tissue injury pressure ulcer (a localized area of discolored, intact skin or a blood-filled blister, often purple or maroon, due to damage of underlying soft tissue, typically from pressure or shear) to the right posterior thigh due to the resident's incontinence and use of incontinence briefs that were too small/tight for the resident when fastened. Actual Harm occurred on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure foods were appropriately stored and discarded when expired. This had the potential to affect 76 residents in the facility receiving food from the kitchen (Resident #40 was ordered nothing by mouth). Facility census was 77. Findings include: Observation on 04/28/25 from 8:36 A.M. to 9:12 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #517 revealed in the walk-in cooler, there was a sheet pan with foil loosely placed over it exposing the contents to air. Beneath the foil was a cut of meat and writing on the foil identified the meat as pork and provided a date of 04/25/25. Continued observation of the walk-in cooler revealed four expired bags of carrots with dates of 02/10/25 or 03/13/25. Observation of the bread cart and an adjacent counter revealed an expired bag of English muffins dated 03/21/25 and an expired loaf of bread dated 04/26/25. Tour of the facility's nourishment refrigerators on the nursing units revealed on the Cherry Grove unit, there was a carton of Resource 2.0 supplement dated 11/02/24.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-12 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, job description review, and interview the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This had the potential to affect all 77 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: During the annual, complaint and extended survey, observations, record reviews, interviews, policy and facility assessment review resulted in concerns including but not limited to situations of neglect resulting in Immediate Jeopardy and actual harm to residents. Additional concerns included but were not limited to change in condition not being addressed and reported timely, staffing needs not being met resulting in a delay of care, not assisting residents to attend outside service appointments, not assisting residents with finding alternate placement when the facility identified their inability to meet the needs of a resident, infection control practices not being followed, equipment and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff maintained infection control practices and failed to provide dedicated equipment for Resident #48 who was identified as being on isolation. This had the potential to affect all residents residing at the facility. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Record review for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 06/21/24. Diagnosis included streptococcal pharyngitis dated 04/29/25. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #48 was cognitively intact. Resident #48 was dependent for bed mobility. Review of the care plan for Resident #48 dated 04/30/25 revealed Resident #48 required droplet isolation related to streptococcus pharyngitis. Interventions included isolation/quarantine maintained by staff during acute infection period. Review of the physician orders for Resident #48 revealed an order dated 04/30/25 for droplet precautions for strep throat. All…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure exit doors were secured to prevent residents who were at risk for elopement from exiting the facility unassisted. This had the potential to affect ten residents (Resident #3, #12, #13, #17, #54, #55, #60, #61, #65, and #75) identified by the facility as being at risk for elopement and having access to an unsecured door. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Record review for Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 03/13/25. Diagnosis included unspecified dementia, unspecified severity with other behavioral disturbances. Review of the care plan dated 03/13/24 for Resident #60 revealed Resident #60 was at high risk for elopement. Interventions included to apply wanderguard (a device worn that will alert an alarmed door when a resident at risk for elopement is near an exit door) to reduce risk of elopement. Review of the physician orders for Resident #60 revealed an order dated 03/14/25 for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-12 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents discharged from skilled services were provided appropriate notification in writing of services ending. This affected two Residents (Resident #77 and #229) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notification. The facility census was 77. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #77 revealed an admission date of 12/01/24 and a discharge date of 02/21/25. Diagnoses included hyperlipidemia, dementia and hypertension. There was no evidence of a Notice for Medicare Non-coverage (NOMNC) provided to the resident. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #229 revealed an admission date of 04/12/25.Diagnoses included hypertension. Morbid obesity, diabetes, kidney disease and dysphagia. There was no evidence of a NOMNC provided to the resident. Review of the beneficiary notice list provided by the facility revealed both Resident's #77 and Resident #229 had been discharged from a Medicare Part A covered stay in the last six months with benefit days remaining. There was no evidence a NOMNC…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to maintain Resident #40's tube feeding pole and floor below his enteral pump in a clean and sanitary manner and failed to provide a smoke-free environment for Resident #58. This affected two residents (Resident #40 and #58) of 27 residents reviewed for homelike environment. The facility assessment was 77. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #58 revealed an admission date of 03/08/24. Diagnosis included paraplegia. Review of the admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #58 was cognitively intact. Resident #58 had impairment to both sides of the lower extremities, used a wheelchair for mobility, required substantial/maximal assistance for bed mobility and was dependent for chair/bed-to-chair transfer. Interview on 04/30/25 at 2:03 P.M. with Resident #58 revealed the smoking area for residents was located outside her window. Residents smoked cigarettes frequently and when they smoked, the smell of the cigarettes came through the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-12 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, investigation review, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure medications were necessary prior to administration, failed to monitor the efficacy of psychotropic medications and failed to ensure residents were comprehensively assessed for side effects of psychotropic medications. This affected two residents (Resident #16, and #60) of five residents reviewed for psychotropic medications. The facility census was 77. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #60 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder, dementia, hypertension, hypothyroidism, type 2 diabetes, malignant neoplasm of pituitary gland, dysphagia, anxiety, and anxiety disorder. The five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #60 had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also revealed Resident #60 had physical and verbal behaviors one to three days and other behaviors four to six days during the assessment period. A plan of care dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure care plans were reviewed and revised for activities. This affected two residents (Resident #10 and #16) of three residents reviewed. The facility census was 77. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 03/15/19. Diagnosis included anxiety disorder. Review of the care plan for Resident #10 last updated 01/19/23 revealed Resident #10 needed encouragement to participate in activities of interest. The resident was dependent on staff for activities, cognitive stimulation, social interaction due to: current health conditions. Resident #10 attended activities on, and off her unit. Activity interests included cards/games, crafts/arts, exercise/sports, music, reading/writing, spiritual/religious, trips/shopping, TV/movies, socials/parties, resident council, coloring, puzzle books, cooking, and pets. Resident #10 worked at a bank, and she was also a computer programmer. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure residents were assisted with care needs to maintain adequate grooming and hygiene. This affected two (Residents #61 and #70) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 77. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #61 revealed an admission date of 09/26/24. Diagnosis included intracranial injury with loss of consciousness, unspecified psychosis, Alzheimer's disease, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the care plan revised 09/26/24 revealed Resident #61 had impaired cognitive process for daily decision making. At risk for further decline in cognitive status. Interventions included to anticipate needs to keep resident clean, dry and comfortable every shift. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #61 was cognitively intact. Resident #61 was occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder, had no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-12 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure activities were offered to meet the individualized needs of residents. This affected two residents (Residents #10 and #16) of three reviewed for activities. The census was 77. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 01/15/19. Diagnoses included depression, hypertension, diabetes, schizoaffective disorder, insomnia, sleep apnea and anxiety. Review of the care plan dated 10/18/22 revealed Resident #16 was dependent on staff for activities, cognitive stimulation and social interaction. He enjoyed pet visits, outings, going outside and fishing. Interventions included encouragement to participate in group activities, pet visits and reminders when activities were beginning. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #16 was cognitively intact. He required partial to moderate assistance for showering and supervision for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 24 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide comprehensive and individualized treatment and maintenance plans for residents with indwelling urinary catheters to prevent potential urinary tract infections. This affected two residents (Resident #33 and #43) of two residents reviewed for indwelling catheters. The census was 77. Findings include: Record review for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 01/10/25. Diagnosis included retention of urine, cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness, and need for assistants with personal care. Review of the Medicare five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #33 was cognitively intact. Resident #33 had an indwelling catheter and required partial/moderate assistants with toileting hygiene and transfers. Review of the progress note for Resident #33 dated 02/28/25 at 12:00 P.M. completed by Registered Nurse (RN) #529 revealed Resident left at this time for a urology appointment. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to administer oxygen per physician order for Resident #230. This affected one (Resident #230) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care. Facility census was 77. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #230 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, anxiety, congestive heart failure, and pneumonia. A physician order dated 04/04/25 at 5:54 P.M. revealed Resident #230 was ordered oxygen via nasal cannula at two to three liters per minute every shift. A plan of care dated 04/08/25 revealed Resident #230 had altered respiratory status and difficulty breathing. Interventions included to provide oxygen as ordered. A plan of care dated 04/23/25 revealed Resident #230 had signs and symptoms of pneumonia. Interventions included to obtain oxygen saturation and administer oxygen as ordered and indicated. Observations on 04/28/25 at 9:49 A.M.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility investigation review, facility assessment review, time punch review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain adequate staffing levels to meet the needs of residents related to medication administration. This affected three residents (Resident #26, #37 and #61) of nine residents reviewed for medication administration preferences. The facility census was 77. Findings include: 1. Review of a facility investigation revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #815 was scheduled to work 05/05/25 from 6:00 P.M. to 6:00 A.M. Review of the time punches for Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #815 revealed she clocked in on 05/05/25 at 6:31 P.M. and clocked out on 05/06/25 at 1:09 A.M. LPN #815 was scheduled on 05/05/25 from 6:00 P.M. to 05/06/25 at 6:00 A.M. on Resident #26's unit. LPN #534 clocked in on 05/05/25 at 11:55 P.M. and clocked out on 05/06/25 at 6:56 A.M. Review of the facility investigation revealed a statement dated 05/06/25 by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #589 that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-12 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility assessment review the facility failed to ensure Resident #70 and the resident representative were provided timely and appropriate transition of care assistance from social services related to locating alternate placement better equipped to address Resident #70's medical and physical needs. This affected one resident (Resident #70) of two residents reviewed for discharge planning. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #70 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included lymphedema, Milroy's disease (also known as primary congenital lymphedema, it is a rare, genetic condition that affects the lymphatic system and causes fluid build up in the legs. It is preset at birth and usually affects the tops of the feet. Symptoms include swelling in the legs (usually below the knees), prominent veins in the lower legs, slanted toenails, noncancerous growths and digestive issues. The severity of swelling can vary within…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure misappropriation of controlled medication did not occur when Resident #49's medication was administered to Resident #60. This affected one (Resident #49) out of five three residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #49 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included neurocognitive disorder with Lewy Bodies, anxiety, and depression. Review of physician orders revealed Resident #49 was ordered Ativan (antianxiety medication) one milliliter (ml) intramuscularly every three minutes as needed for seizures from 01/16/25 and discontinued on 01/30/25. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #49 was cognitively intact. Review of the controlled drug receipt/record/disposition sheet for Resident #49 revealed one ml of Ativan was administered on 05/06/25 at 6:00 A.M. Interview on 05/07/25 at 1:38 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were addressed in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #60) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Facility census was 77. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #60 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder, dementia, hypertension, hypothyroidism, type 2 diabetes, malignant neoplasm of pituitary gland, dysphagia, anxiety, and vitamin D deficiency. A physician order dated 03/14/25 revealed Resident #60 was ordered Trazodone (antidepressant) 25 milligram (mg) at bedtime. Review of the pharmacy recommendation dated 03/21/25 revealed Trazodone 25 mg was ordered for insomnia. Resident #60 did not have a diagnosis of insomnia. The use of psychotropic medications required a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the medical record. On 04/29/25 the physician agreed with the diagnosis of insomnia being added to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to assure one resident, Resident #10's psychotropic medication was decreased as ordered. This affected one Resident, Resident #10 of three residents reviewed for unnecessary drugs. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Record review for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 03/15/19. Diagnosis included anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 was cognitively intact. Resident #10 had anxiety disorder. Review of the physician orders for Resident #10 revealed an order dated 05/09/24 for Vistaril oral capsule (hydroxyzine pamoate) give 25 milligrams (mg) by mouth at bedtime for itching. Review of the medical record and progress notes for Resident #10 from 05/01/24 through 05/09/24 revealed no indication or observation of Resident #10 itching. Review of the Consultant Pharmacy Recommendation to Physician/Prescriber #900 printed 12/18/24 revealed Resident #10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-12 · tag F0840 — isolatedEmploy or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview and facility assessment review the facility failed to ensure residents were provided transportation to medical appointments as ordered. This affected one (Resident #70) of one residents reviewed for transportation. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #70 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included lymphedema, Milroy's disease, autistic disorder, attention deficit hyperactive disorder, and expressive language disorder. The medical record revealed Resident #70 had an appointment with a cardiologist on 12/11/24 and a plastic surgeon on 01/15/25. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #70 was cognitively intact and was dependent for activities of daily living. A health status note dated 02/07/25 at 5:19 A.M. revealed Resident #70's mother visited the first part of the shift. The resident's mother reminded staff Resident #70 needed a signed referral sent to the Cleveland Clinic prior…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #64 was offered the influenza (flu) vaccine from 02/27/25 to 03/31/25. This affected one resident (#64) of five residents reviewed for influenza immunizations. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include altered mental status, need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, and major depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a clinical assessment of a resident's functional capabilities) dated 03/07/25 revealed Resident #64 had intact cognition. Further review of the medical record revealed no evidence the resident was offered the influenza vaccine after admission. Interview on 04/30/25 at 1:40 P.M. with Regional Director of Clinical Services #704 revealed the facility was unable to locate any information regarding Resident #64's consent or refusal of the influenza…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-12 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the Covid-19 immunization was offered to residents. This affected four (#15, #58, #63, and #64) of five residents reviewed for Covid-19 immunizations. The facility census was 77. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 02/26/25. Diagnoses include cerebral palsy (a group of disorders that impact movement, muscle tone, or posture), need for assistance with personal care, anxiety disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a lung condition that limits airflow into and out of the lungs), heart failure, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a clinical assessment of resident's functional capabilities) dated 03/13/25 revealed Resident #15 had intact cognition. Review of the medical record revealed no evidence the resident was offered the COVID-19 immunization. Interview on 04/30/25 at 1:40 P.M. with Regional Director of Clinical Services RDCS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident #70 was able to be transferred and evacuated from his room in the event of an emergency. This affected one (Resident #70) out of one reviewed for emergency transfer and evacuation. Facility census was 77. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #70 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included lymphedema, Milroy's disease, autistic disorder, attention deficit hyperactive disorder, and expressive language disorder. A general progress note dated 10/24/24 at 4:52 P.M. revealed Resident #70 was alert and oriented times one and was primarily nonverbal. A bariatric mattress was provided but currently displayed error sounds due to the weight of Resident #70. Resident #70's weight was unable to be obtained due to Resident #70's weight exceeded the weight limit on the bariatric Hoyer (mechanical) lift. A general progress note dated 10/24/24 at 10:27 P.M. revealed four staff attempted to do a skin sweep on Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, self-reported incident (SRI) review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #72, who was on an anticoagulant (blood thinner), was monitored and treated timely for bruising. This affected one resident (#72) out of three residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #72 revealed an admission date of 10/29/18 and a discharge date of 04/11/24. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, unspecified dementia, polyp of colon, and age-related osteoporosis. Review of the Significant Change Minimal Data System (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #72 had severely impaired cognition. Review of the care plan dated 10/20/18 revealed Resident #72 was care planned for the potential for bleeding or hemorrhage related to the use of medications that have blood-thinning effects. Interventions included observe for signs of bleeding, black tarry stools, bruising, hematuria,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure documentation was completed on the treatment administration records (TAR) as required after treatment is provided for Resident #73. This affected one resident (#73) out of three residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #73 revealed an admission date of 03/18/24 and a discharge date of 04/01/24. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, type II diabetes mellitus (DM), sleep apnea, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, and sepsis. Review of the admission wound assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #73 was admitted to the facility with multiple wounds. The wound on the sacrum was a stage IV pressure ulcer (Full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle. Slough may be present on some parts of the wound bed. Often include undermining and tunneling.) measuring 12.9…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-08-04 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure its medical director or designee attended all required quality assurance (QA) meetings (at least quarterly) as required. This had the potential to affect all 65 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility sign-in sheets for its QA meetings for the second quarter of the year 2022 revealed meetings were held on the following dates: • 04/27/22 • 05/03/22 • 06/01/22 • 06/14/22 • 06/28/22 • 07/12/22 • 07/26/22 There was no documented evidence the medical director or designee was in attendance in any of the above meetings. The Administrator verified that the facilities medical director was not in attendance for any of the QA meetings during the second quarter of 2022 during an interview on 08/03/22 at 3:15 P.M.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-04 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the smoking areas were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This finding affected three residents (Resident's #6, #10 and #64) and had the potential to affect an additional five residents (Resident's #15, #22, #47, #58 and #65) the facility identified as smokers who were identified as smokers by the facility. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Observation on 08/02/22 at 9:09 A.M. of the Beechwood smoking patio revealed Resident's #10 and #64 were in the smoking area and both were assessed to smoke independently. Approximately eleven cigarette butts were observed on the ground and grass areas, and no staff were present in the smoking area at the time of the observation. Observation on 08/02/22 at 9:18 A.M. of the Beechwood smoking patio with Maintenance Director #66 confirmed the area had multiple cigarette butts on the concrete walkway and grass areas. Observation on 08/02/22 at 9:24 A.M. with Maintenance Director #66 of the Dogwood patio revealed assorted cigarette butts were on the ground and grass…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-04 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive assessments were complete and accurate. This finding affected three residents (Resident's #6, #12 and #15) of 21 residents reviewed for comprehensive assessments. The facility census was 65. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety disorder, essential hypertension, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed, during the seven-day look back period from 07/02/22 to 07/08/22, he did not receive hypnotics or diuretics. Review of Resident #6's physician orders revealed an order dated 05/12/22 for Restoril (hypnotic) 7.5 mg (milligrams) give one tablet by mouth at bedtime for insomnia and an order dated 05/04/22 for Lasix (diuretic) give 60 mg by mouth two times a day related to essential hypertension. Review of Resident #6's medication administration records (MAR)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, review of the manufacturer's directions, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of 5% (percent) or less. This finding affected two residents (Resident's #49 and #39) of six residents observed for medication administration. A total of 27 medications were administered with three errors for a medication error rate of 11.1%. The facility census was 65. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #49's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes and hypoglycemia. Review of Resident #49's physician orders revealed an order dated 11/18/21 for Lantus (long-acting insulin) KwikPen inject 34 units subcutaneously (SQ) one time a day for diabetes and an order dated 07/05/22 for Humalog (short-acting insulin) KwikPen inject 15 units SQ with meals related to diabetes. Observation on 08/01/22 at 8:16 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 92 of Resident #49's medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2019-08-15 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — widespreadNot hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of personnel files, review of the facility new hire list, review of the facility abuse policy and staff interview the facility failed to ensure all potential new staff hires were checked against the Nurse Aide Registry (NAR) prior to employment to ensure the employee did not have a finding entered into the State Nurse Aide Registry concerning abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of residents or misappropriation of property and failed to complete a background check and fingerprinting with the Bureau of Criminal Identification and Investigation for Registered Nurse (RN) #600. This affected one RN, five supervisor employees, 15 housekeeping staff, four laundry staff, 11 dietary staff, three maintenance staff and one administrative staff member and had the potential to affect all 81 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the new hire list dated 06/28/19 to 08/13/19 and review of employee personnel files revealed the following employees had been hired within this time period: Laundry staff #801, #804, #805, #806, Housekeeping staff #807,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2019-08-15 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespreadDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to effectively implement their abuse policy and procedure to ensure narcotic medications and funds were not misappropriated for Resident #50 and Resident #52 and to ensure all proper and required screening procedures were completed at the time of hire to ensure no employee had a finding entered into the State Nurse Aide Registry concerning abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of residents or misappropriation or had a disqualifying offense based on a criminal background check. This affected one RN, five supervisor employees, 15 housekeeping staff, four laundry staff, 11 dietary staff, three maintenance staff and one administrative staff member. In addition, this affected two residents (#50 and #52) and had the potential to affect all 81 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease and calculus of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-15 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to prevent the misappropriation of narcotic medication for Resident #50 and Resident #52 and failed to prevent misappropriation of funds for Resident #52. This affected two residents (#50 and #52) of four residents reviewed for abuse, neglect and misappropriation. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease and calculus of kidney with ureter. Review of physician's orders for November 2018 revealed Resident #50 was ordered Percocet (narcotic pain medication) 5/325 milligram (mg) every six hours. Review of a facility self-reported incident, dated 11/11/18 A.M. at 6:30 A.M. revealed Resident #50 stated he had not received his 6:00 A.M. pain medication. Review of the controlled drug record form dated 11/04/18 through 11/11/18, revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #600 signed out a Percocet for Resident #50 at 6:00 A.M. A written statement, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #9 and Resident #33, who required staff assistance for activities of daily living including personal hygiene and nail care received timely and adequate care. The affected two residents (#9 and #33) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis including dementia. Review of the plan of care, dated 02/10/16 revealed the resident needed assistance for activities of daily living. Interventions included staff would assist as needed with daily hygiene. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 07/13/19 revealed the resident had impaired cognition. The resident required supervision of one staff for personal hygiene. Observation on 08/12/19 at 2:50 P.M., 08/13/19 at 8:54 A.M. and 2:49 P.M. and 08/14/19 at 8:08 A.M. of Resident #9 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed ensure geriatric (geri) sleeves were provided as ordered for Resident #33 as ordered by the physician. This affected one resident (#33) of one reviewed for skin conditions. Findings include: Review of Resident #33's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Alzheimer's disease, syndrome of inappropriate secretions of antidiuretic hormone, hypertension, rheumatoid arthritis, macular degeneration, major depressive disorder, presence of intraocular lens, viteous degeneration, xerosis cutis, peripheral vascular disease, dementia, hallucination, and anxiety disorder. Review of nurse's notes, dated 06/26/19 at 2:24 P.M. revealed the resident had a skin tear to her left elbow area. The injury occurred while transferring from wheelchair to the bed. The measurements were 1.5 centimeters in diameter. The edges were not approximated. An order was obtained to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to properly fill the humidifier bottle on the oxygen concentrator for Resident #33 with distilled water. This affected one resident (#33) of 19 residents who received oxygen therapy. Findings include Review of Resident #33's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Alzheimer's disease, syndrome of inappropriate secretions of antidiuretic hormone, hypertension, rheumatoid arthritis, macular degeneration, major depressive disorder, presence of intraocular lens, viteous degeneration, xerosis cutis, peripheral vascular disease, dementia, hallucination, and anxiety disorder. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 07/22/19 revealed Resident #33 had severely impaired cognition and required extensive assistance from staff with all activities of daily living. Review of the August 2019 physician's orders revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to have a current physician's order before administering the antipsychotic medication, Haldol to Resident #65 and failed to ensure the resident had an appropriate diagnosis for the use of the antipsychotic medication Seroquel. This affected one resident (#65) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: Review of Resident #65's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease, dementia, major depressive disorder, psychosis, hallucinations, and anxiety. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 05/29/19 revealed Resident #65 had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also revealed the resident had not exhibited any behaviors during the assessment period. Review of the physician's orders revealed an order, dated 07/24/19 for the antipsychotic medication, Haldol 2.5 milligram (mg) intramuscular injection (IM) as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$40,950 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $40,950 — penalty dated 2025-05-12
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $352K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365591. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.