No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Delaware Court Health Care Center

4 New Market Dr, Delaware, OH 43015 · For profit - Corporation · 75 certified beds · (740) 369-6400 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (740) 369-6400 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Oct 2023Resident-funds citations (F0565, F0567, F0568, F0569)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567, F0568, F0569)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
551 W Central Ave Ste 301 · (740) 615-1800 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1725 W Central Ave · (740) 363-8171 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Kroger1.1 mi
801 N Houk Rd · (740) 362-7476 · Call to confirm hours
Park
70 Marvin Ln · (740) 203-1810 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.0%5.3%15.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.9%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms18.2%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.5%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.7%6.1%16.1%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.7%25.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.2%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control34.2%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.1%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.5%75.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission35.7%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit43.5%12.9%12.0%check this — see note marked dagger below the table

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

52.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.16U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF52.8%CMS range 40.7–65.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.5%CMS range 5.8–15.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.781.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.73
RN hours/ resident / day
0.79
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.12
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.64
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.68
RN hoursweekends
31.1%
Total nursing turnover
0.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 75 beds and averages 55.1 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.64 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.80 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.68 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-09)
19
at the previous standard inspection (2023-10-19)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place as ordered. This affected one Resident (#39) out of four Residents (#6, #39, #51, and #58) reviewed for fall incidents and accident prevention. The facility census was 59.Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included late onset Alzheimer's disease, dementia in other diseases, and anxiety disorder amongst other diagnoses. Further review of Resident #39's medical record revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score could not be evaluated as the resident was rarely or never understood as of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed on 04/03/26, though the resident was noted to have severe cognitive impairment.Review of the physician orders revealed Resident #39 had an order for an alarm to be placed in the resident's chair and bed every shift for safety, with a start date of 02/24/26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-09 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to address resident concerns brought up at the resident council meetings. This affected four Residents (#23, #27, #30, and #44). Facility census was 59. Findings Include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 09/09/25. Diagnoses included atrial fibrillation, pulmonary disease, dysphagia and fracture of the right foot. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 indicating intact cognition. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 10/02/24. Diagnoses included dementia, pulmonary disease, dysphagia and heart disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 10 indicating impaired cognition. 3. Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 01/06/25. Diagnoses included memory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents resided in a safe, clean and comfortable environment. This affected six residents (#3, #9, #27, #33, #41 and #50) of seven ( #21) reviewed for environmental concerns. The census was 59Findings Include:A facility tour conducted on 01/28/26 at 8:15 A.M. revealed all resident rooms, and the resident private dining room had a Packaged Terminal Air Conditioner (PTAC) unit (a self-contained heating and cooling unit in which offer individual room control ) . The temperature outside on this day was cold with daily highs in the mid to low teens and lows near or below zero Fahrenheit.Observation on 01/28/26 at 8:30 A.M. of the Resident Private Dining Room revealed the PTAC unit was installed below the room window. The unit was secured to the wall, however, on the right side of the unit there was a 1/4 inch opening between the PTAC unit and the wall where the unit did not span the opening leaving a gap opened to the outside which allowed cold air to come into the room.Observation conducted on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure proper indication of use for medication, and failed to ensure duplicate medication had maximum dosage for use indicated, this affected one resident (#36) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility also failed to ensure pain medications were ordered with parameters and administered appropriately. This affected two Residents (#10 and #36) of two reviewed for pain management. The census was 59. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 02/14/25. Diagnoses included dementia, cerebral infarct, fractured tibia, malnutrition, vascular disease and osteoporosis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 03 indicating impaired cognition. Review of physician orders dated 02/14/25 revealed an order for Acetaminophen (antipyretic/analgesic) tablet 325 milligram (mg) with instructions to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews and record review, facility failed to ensure food was served and at a safe and palatable temperature. This had the potential to affect all facility residents except Resident #2. Facility census was 59. Findings include:Observation and interview on 09/30/25 at 12:25 P.M. with Dietary Staff (DS) #183 revealed food was being served to residents in the dining room and about half of the dining room had been served lunch. Dietary staff #183 was asked about food temperatures and DS #183 stated they took cooking temperatures but not holding temperatures. Temperatures were then obtained of food items on the hold steam table and found the green beans were 184 degrees Fahrenheit (F), the mashed potatoes were 178 degrees F, the burger patties were 120 degrees F, the salmon patties were 74 degrees F and the potatoes were 146 degrees F. The burger patties and salmon patties were placed back in the oven after surveyor intervention. DS #183 stated if the puree food had not taken so long,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-09 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure puree food was made to the correct consistency. This affected six residents (#7, #21, #25, #28, #42, and #52) who had orders for puree food. Facility census was 59. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 10/29/21. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, respiratory failure, protein malnutrition, dysphagia, and parkinsonism. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 indicating intact cognition. Review of physician orders dated 08/27/25 to 10/18/25 revealed an order for puree texture food. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 01/25/24. Diagnoses included malnutrition, heart disease and osteoporosis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 00 indicating impaired cognition. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure food was stored in a safe and sanitary manner, failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was completed when making puree food, taking food temperatures and during tray line service and failed to ensure the kitchen maintained proper sanitation. This affected all Residents except Resident #2 who did not eat food from the kitchen. Facility census was 59. Findings include1. Observation on 09/30/25 from 08:10 A.M. to 8:25 A.M. revealed a bowl of cookies in envelopes with no date on the bowl or on the individual envelopes. A tray of cookies sitting on the prep table on a cookie sheet that was not covered. Three pre made sandwiches wrapped in foil were left in the fridge and were undated and unlabeled. A large metal bowl with fajita mix was covered with plastic wrap and was not dated. A bag of vanilla wafers was open to air and not sealed. 14 chocolate magic cups were thawed and the container/package stated to keep frozen. Six cups of yogurt were found to be undated. A red bowl was found in the fridge with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-09 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, and staff interview, this facility failed to ensure an updated Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed when a resident was diagnosed with a new mental illness diagnosis. This affected one (Resident #53) of the one resident reviewed for accurate PASARRs. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 05/29/2020. Diagnoses included dementia, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety, and delusional disorders. Review of Resident #53's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15 indicating an moderately impaired cognition for daily decision-making abilities. Review of the electronically uploaded PASARR dated 03/11/2020 revealed under question. Does this resident have a diagnosis of any mental disorders? This question was noted as no. Interview on 09/30/2025 at 2:13 P.M. with the Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-18 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that the shower rooms were maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. This was noted in all four of the facility's shower rooms and impacted all residents who used them (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #24, #25, #26, #27, #28, #29, #30, #31, #33, #34, #35, #36, #37, #39, #41, #42, #43, #44, #45, #46, #47, #48, #49, #50, #51, #52, #53, and #54). The facility census was 54. Findings include: Observation on 11/14/24 at 8:55 A.M. revealed the 300's shower room contained black-spotted substances along the grout lines and tile, specifically at the bottom of the wall beneath the shower head and in the corners. Observation on 11/14/24 at 8:58 A.M. revealed the 100's shower room showed black-spotted substances along the grout lines and tile at the bottom of the wall under the shower head and in the corners. The shower chair had deteriorating fabric, with black-spotted substances and long, twisted hairs between the legs and base of the chair.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure wound care was completed per physician orders. This affected one (#10) of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 46. Findings Include: Review of resident #10's medical record revealed and admission date of 01/23/18. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non dominant side, cardiomyopathy, chronic systolic congestive heart failure, hypertension, osteoarthritis of knee, abnormalities of gait and mobility, weakness, and atrial fibrillation with long term use of anticoagulants. Resident #10 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] per her request. Review of the discharge, return anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/08/23, revealed Resident #10 had one facility acquired, unstageable pressure ulcer. Review of a Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP) wound progress note, dated 08/08/23, revealed Resident #10 had a new…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-19 · tag F0837 — widespread
    Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Board of Executives of Long-Term Services and Supports (BELTS) website review review and staff interview, and BELTS Representative interview, the facility failed to ensure the Administrator had an active license. This affected all 52 residents in the facility during the annual survey. The census was 52. Findings include: Review of the Board of Executives of Long-Term Services and Supports (BELTS) website on [DATE] revealed the facility's Administrator's license had expired on [DATE]. Interview on [DATE] at 11:55 A.M., with the Administrator revealed he was unaware his license had expired until surveyor notification during the annual survey. Interview on [DATE] at 11:30 A.M., with the Board of Executives of Long-Term Services and Supports Representative confirmed the Administrator had been practicing for six months with an expired license and would be receiving disciplinary action from the board. She revealed the Administrator did not apply for renewal of licensing until [DATE].

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure an infection surveillance plan was in place for identifying, tracking, and monitoring outbreaks. This had the potential to affect all 52 residents. Facility census was 52. Findings include: Review of the infection control tracking logs revealed resident infections were monitored for location with a facility map, but signs symptoms, labs and cultures were not included. There was no evidence of the use of evidence-based surveillance criteria to define infections and determine appropriateness of treatment options. There was no evidence the facility determined percentage of nosocomial (community based infections) for facility each month as a tracking tool. There was no evidence that notes, cultures, labs, treatments and multi-drug-resistant organism statuses were tracked upon transfer to and from acute care hospitals. Interview on 10/19/23 at 12:25 P.M., with the Director of Nursing (DON) and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #127 revealed if a resident has signs of infection they will talk with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-19 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the plumbing equipment was maintained in a safe and sanitary conditions . This had the potential to affect 50 of 50 residents who receive meals from the kitchen. excluding two (#3 and #305) residents who recive tube feeding. The faciltiy census was 52. Findings include: Tour of the kitchen on 10/16/23 at 9:30 A.M., revealed a red plastic coffee can under the three compartments sink on the right side. The pipe had a slow drip. Observations on 10/18/23 from 11:18 A.M. to 11:45 A.M., while observing puree food preparation, the kitchen floor became flooded, instantly water appeared from the floor under the three compartments sink to the far right under the oven and to the far left of the walk in freezer. The water was approximately one quarter inch deep. Employees were observed walking through the water unaware of how the water appeared. Observation of the area under the three compartment sink revealed the drain and tiles around it under the sink were raised. No water was draining into the drain. The red plastic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-19 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on financial records, Personal Needs Account Procedures review and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure resident care needs account was in an interest-bearing account. In addition, none of the 12 residents or their representatives signed an authorization form for the facility to handle their personal care need accounts. This affected all 12 (#36, #11, #5, #29, #7, #15, #14, #13, #42, #44, #34 and #33) residents personal care need accounts which the facility is representative payee. The census was 52. Findings include: Review of Resident #36, #11 and #7's monthly bank statements for their personal care needs account revealed the accounts are in a checking account with a local bank. The account does not bear any interest. Interview on 10/16/23 at 2:30 P.M., with Business Office Manager #159 confirmed all 12 personal care need accounts (#36, #11, #5, #29, #7, #15, #14, #13, #42, #44, #34 and #33) are at the local bank, in a checking account that does not bear interest. She confirmed she does not have a personal care need account authorization form signed by each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-19 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on financial record reviews, resident interviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents receive a quarterly statement for their personal care need account. This affected 12 (#36, #11, #5, #29, #7, #15, #14, #13, #42, #44, #34 and #33) of 12 residents with personal care need accounts. The census was 52. Findings include: Interview on 10/15/23 from 10:00 A.M. to 10:15 A.M., with with Resident #13 and Resident #14 revealed they do not receive a statement for her personal care need account. Review of the excel sheet from 10/23/22 to 10/03/23 for Resident #7, #11, #33, #36, and #44 revealed it is not an official statement for the personal care need account or a bank statement for each resident. The excel sheet does not have the resident's name or account number, or interest earned on it. Interview on 10/16/23 at 2:30 P.M., with Business Office Manager #159 confirmed the facility receives monthly checking account statements for Resident (#36, #11, #5, #29, #7, #15, #14, #13, #42, #44, #34 and #33) personal care needs accounts and the statements are filed in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-19 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — pattern
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, medical record reviews, dentist roster review, Dental Mobile Office Representative interview, resident interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to offer dental services to residents. This affected one (#13) of one resident reviewed for dental services. This had the potential to affect 20 (#1, #3, #5, #36, #8, #10, #11, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #22, #24, #26, #27, #29, #34, #36, #42 and #46) additional resident who consented to see the dentist. The census was 52. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 09/16/22. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease , chronic pulmonary edema, and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. Resident #13 obtained Medicaid benefits on 10/06/22 . Observation on 10/16/23 at 3:34 P.M., with Resident #13 revealed she is without teeth and without dentures. Interview at the time of the observation revealed Resident #13 revealed she would like to have dentures. She requested them in the past and no one has spoken to her about seeing a dentist. Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-19 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, email communication review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure antibiotics were ordered and used appropriately for residents with potential infections. This affected four (#21, #35, #37, #47) of four residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. Facility census was 52. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for the Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 09/08/21. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, diabetes, anxiety, blindness, and hypothyroidism. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance of two staff members for bed mobility and was totally dependent for transfers. Review of the plan of care revealed no mention of infection or treatment of infection, besides COVID infections. Review of the physician order dated 08/10/23 revealed orders for wound care to cleanse right leg with warm soapy water and use 0.9 normal saline flush over, apply…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on financial record reviews and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who are insured by Medicaid do not exceed $2,000.00 in their personal care needs accounts. This affected three Medicaid residents (#7, #11 and #36) of three accounts reviewed with funds above the $2,000.00 limit. The census was 52. Findings include: Review of Resident #7's Checking Account Bank Statement and excel sheet revealed a balance of $5,140.52 as of 10/11/23. A notification of spend letter was not available. Review of Resident #11's Checking Account Bank Statement and excel sheet revealed a balance of $4,008.79. as of 10/11/23. A notification of spend letter was not available. Review of Resident #36's Checking Account Bank Statement and excel sheet revealed a balance of $4,777.46 as of 10/3/23. A Spin Down notification letter was sent to Resident #36 representative on 04/05/23. Interview on 10/16/23 at 2:30 P.M., with Business Office Manager #159 stated the families or guardians have been notified of the account balances, however, the balances remain above the Medicaid amount. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a residents code status was accurately reflected in the medical record. This affected one (#10) of two residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 52. Findings include Review of the medical record for the Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 03/03/18. Diagnoses included chronic atrial fibrillation, cerebral infarction, cognitive deficit, and dysphagia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 was cognitively impaired with a BIMS of 3 and required extensive assistance of one to two staff members for bed mobility and transfers. Review of the code status sheet signed by the physician dated 03/02/18 revealed Resident #10 was code status DNRCC-A. This was documented in the paper medical record. Review of physician orders dated 03/14/22 identified orders for resident code status of DNRCC in the electronic medical record. Review of the plan of care dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure beneficiary notices were provided prior to a reduction of skilled services. This affected one (#206) of two residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The facility census was 52. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for the Resident #206 revealed an admission date of 06/10/23 and discharge on [DATE]. Diagnoses included surgical aftercare, diabetes, heart failure, arthritis and dyspnea. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #206 was cognitively intact and required supervision assist with mobility and transfers. Interview on 10/17/23 at 1:25 P.M., with Social Services #120 revealed Resident #206 went to a physician appointment and was informed his skilled services could end. Resident #206 was not provided with Notice of Medicare noncoverage (NOMNC) prior to discharge in case he wanted to appeal the decrease in services. The facility was unable to provide evidence this was a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, statement reviews, and policy review, the facility failed to report an alleged allegation of abuse, neglect, and misappropriation to the state agency. This affected one (#21) of one resident reviewed for abuse/neglect. The facility census was 52. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 09/21/22. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, diabetes, legal blindness, cerebral infarct, weakness, vascular disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 was cognitively intact with a BIMS of 15 and required extensive assistance of two staff members for bed mobility and was totally dependent for transfers. Review of the plan of care dated 06/22/23 revealed Resident #21 had an activities of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit and required assistance for bathing and transfers. Residents care plan did not include any evidence of behaviors or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, statement review, staff interview and review policy, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation for an alleged allegation of abuse, neglect, and misappropriation. This affected one (#21) of one resident reviewed for abuse/neglect. The facility census was 52. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 09/21/22. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, diabetes, legal blindness, cerebral infarct, weakness, vascular disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 was cognitively intact with a BIMS of 15 and required extensive assistance of two staff members for bed mobility and was totally dependent for transfers. Review of the plan of care dated 06/22/23 revealed Resident #21 had an activities of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit and required assistance for bathing and transfers. Residents care plan did not include any evidence of behaviors or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of facility communication emails, review of policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman when residents were transferred/discharged from the facility. This affected two (#52 and #53) of two residents reviewed for discharge home. The facility census was 52. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident # 52 revealed an admission date of 04/14/23, with no cognitive deficits. Diagnoses included seizures, aortic stenosis. hyperlipidemia and chronic pulmonary embolism. Resident #52 was discharged home on [DATE]. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 05/17/23 with no cognitive deficits. Diagnoses include chronic anemia, hiatal hernia, deep vein thrombosis and atrial fibrillation. Resident #53 was discharged to a long term care facility on 08/25/23. Review of the Social Service Designee #120 notification emails to the Ombudsman Office from 10/01/22 to 10/17/23, revealed the Ombudsman Office was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to have a care plan for a psychotropic medication. This affected one (#305) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 52. Findings include: Review of Resident #305's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage affecting right dominant side, aphasia and dysphasia following cerebral hemorrhage, atrial fibrillation, encounter for attention to gastrostomy. Review of the Minimal Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #305 was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of one to two staff for all activities of daily living. Review of the physician orders for October 2023 revealed Resident #305 was ordered an antidepressant Prozac HCl Capsule 10 milligrams (mg), give one capsule via Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (peg-tube) in the evening for depression.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a recapitulation of the resident's stay was provided when residents were discharge from the facility This affected two (#52 and #53) of two residents reviewed for discharged . The census was 52. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #52 revealed an admission date of 04/14/23, with no cognitive deficits. Diagnoses included seizures, aortic stenosis, hyperlipidemia and chronic pulmonary embolism. Resident #52 was discharged home on [DATE]. Review of Resident #52's Discharge Summary Sheet (one page) revealed no recapitulation of Resident #52 care at the facility. There were two pages to a Discharge Summary Report, Resident #52 did not receive a complete Discharge Summary Report when Resident #52 was discharged home on [DATE]. Interview on 10/17/23 at 11: 37 A.M., with Social Service Designee #120 confirmed the facility does not have evidence of a Discharge Summary Report or a recapitulation for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were reviewed timely by a physician and also failed to ensure recommendations reviewed had the recommendations acted upon as agreed upon by the physician. This affected two (#36 and #38) of five residents reviewed for pharmacy recommendations. Facility census was 52. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for the Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 07/14/22. Diagnoses included depression, hypertension, dementia, anxiety, cognitive communication deficit and unsteadiness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #38 was cognitively impaired and with a BIMS of 9 and required extensive assistance of one for bed mobility and supervision for transfers. Review of physician orders dated 02/28/23 for Abilify 5 milligram (mg) revealed no attempts to complete a dose reduction for this medication. Physician order for oxybutynin ER 5 mg revealed on 09/21/23, an order was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from unnecessary medication. This affected one (#3) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. The facility census was 52. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 05/12/21. Diagnoses included encephalopathy, heart disease, diabetes, osteoarthritis and hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of one to two staff members for bed mobility and transfers. Review of physician orders for 04/16/22 identified orders for gentamicin 0/3% eye drop with instructions to administer 1-2 drops into eye for pink eye. Review of the medical record found no evidence of resident being diagnosed or seen for pink eye. Review of Medication Administration Record dated April 2022 to July 2022 revealed the resident had a new order for gentamicin eye drops in April 2022…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, policy review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the texture of a modified diet was provided to the physician ordered consistency. This affected (#3) one of one residents reviewed for a modified diet. The census was 52. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 05/12/21. Diagnoses included encephalopathy, heart disease, diabetes, osteoarthritis, and hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of one to two staff members for bed mobility and transfers. Review of Resident #3 physician orders for October 2023 revealed Resident #3 is on a puree diet. Interview on 10/18/23 at 11:18 A.M., with Dietary Aid #151 revealed there was only one resident who received a puree diet. The menu for lunch included corn beef briquet, green beans and Italian potatoes. Observation of Dietary Aid #151 on 10/18/23 from 11:18 A.M. to 11:42…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure call lights were in proper working order. This affected one (#5) of one resident reviewed for environment. Facility census was #52. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 10/31/19. Diagnoses included diabetes, encephalopathy, heart disease, epilepsy, alcoholic cirrhosis, muscle weakness, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of two staff members for bed mobility and transfers. The MDS revealed resident had impairment to one side including the upper and lower extremity. Review of the plan of care dated 07/25/23 revealed Resident #5 had an Activity of Daily Living (ADL) self care deficit with interventions to support his left side during transfers and staff to set up…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure advanced directives for the code status were signed by the physician. This affected two (#7 and #20) residents reviewed for code status in a total facility census of 47. Findings include: 1. Review of the record for Resident #20 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnosis included atherosclerotic heart disease, dementia with behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, hypertension, macular degeneration and glaucoma. Review of the admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a brief interview of mental status score of three, indicating impaired cognition. Review of undated document titled, DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) Comfort Care DNR Identification Form, revealed an unsigned copy of an advanced directive for code status by the physician. The document was signed by the Power of Attorney (POA). Review of document titled, DNR Comfort Care DNR Identification…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-05 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and review of an undated form titled, Form Instructions for the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) CMS-10123, the facility failed to ensure appropriate beneficiary notices were provided to residents. This affected one (#295) of three residents reviewed for provision of beneficiary notices. The facility census was 47. Findings include: Review of the record for Resident #295 revealed an admission on [DATE] and discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Resident #285 did not return to the facility. Diagnosis included orthopedic aftercare, discitis lumbar region, fusion of spine, urinary tract infection, history transient ischemic heart attack, cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of right middle cerebral artery and history of COVID-19. Review of the discharge return not anticipated minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a planned discharge to the community with a discharge date of 04/28/21. Resident #295 had a Medicare-covered stay…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews with staff and residents, and review of the facility policy's, the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised to include an accurate code status, updated fall interventions, and updated dental concerns. This affected three (#9, #16 and #37) of sixteen residents reviewed for revision of care plans. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure care conferences were conducted. This affected one (#10) of one resident reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 47. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 04/21/21. Diagnosis included encephalopathy, anemia, heart disease, hypertension, Type II diabetes, major depression disorder single episode, retention of urine, hemorrhoids, history of malignant neoplasm of prostate, unsteadiness on feet and pain in right shoulder. Review of the Admission/Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a brief interview for mental status score (BIMS) of five,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were implemented. This affected one (#9) of two residents reviewed for implementation of fall interventions. The facility census was 47. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 04/21/21. Diagnosis included encephalopathy, anemia, heart disease, hypertension, Type Two diabetes, major depression disorder single episode, retention of urine, hemorrhoids, history of malignant neoplasm of prostate, unsteadiness on feet and pain in right shoulder. Review of Admission/Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a brief interview for mental status score (BIMS) of five, indicating severely impaired cognition. Resident #9 required extensive assistance of two or more persons physical assist for bed mobility, transfers and toilet use. Resident #9 required supervision of two or more persons physical assistance for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-02-09 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance meetings occurred quarterly as required. This had the potential to affect all residents who reside in the nursing facility. The census was 59.Findings include:Review of the Quality Assurance (QA) Meeting Notes for the Facility revealed the committee met on 10/15/24, 1/21/25, 4/15/25, and 7/22/25. There was no quarterly meetings held during the last quarter of 2025. The meeting documentation revealed this was the meeting the medical director participated in at the facility. Review of the facility records revealed the facility held monthly Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings, however the medical director did not participate in these meetings. Interview on 02/09/26 at 2:00 P.M. with the Interim Director of Nursing # 179 confirmed the facility does not have QA meeting notes to indicate a meeting was held in the last quarter of 2025. Interview on 02/09/26 at 4:00 P.M. with the Administrator and the Regional Clinical Director # 178, confirmed the Medical Director does not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LEVERING MANAGEMENT, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 08/05/1985
LEVERING, CYNTHIAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF11%since 12/30/2020
LEVERING, KENNETHIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF11%since 07/01/1985
LEVERING, THOMASIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF11%since 12/30/2020
LEVERING, W. JOANIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF46%since 08/05/1985
LEVERING, WILLIAMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF14%since 08/05/1985
GUPTA, RAJNISHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/27/2017

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-9.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$451K
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 17%Medicare 3%Other / private 80%

This home reported $451K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$298per resident / day
operating cost
$9,053per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$271per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365676. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next