Friendship Village Of Dublin

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

70.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 200 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 51.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 105 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 97% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 40.9 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.20 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.25 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.05 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.40 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.40 to 0.87 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2019-10-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, review of facility investigation, review of staff statements, review of a facility policy, family interview and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided adequate assistance during transfers. Actual harm occurred on 01/08/19 when Resident #8, who required extensive assistance from two staff using a Hoyer lift was pivot transferred and subsequently repositioned in a Broda (specialized chair) by one staff resulting in a femur fracture requiring surgical repair. In addition, the facility failed to ensure Resident #32 had interventions in place to ensure she can safely transfer to and from her wheelchair, which placed the resident at risk for potential harm. This affected two residents (#8 and #32) of three residents reviewed for accidents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed an original admission date of 12/27/16 with the latest readmission of 01/13/19 with re-admitting diagnoses of osteoarthritis, dementia,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to prepare, distribute and serve food in a safe, sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 40. Findings Include: Observation on 11/13/24 at 11:30 A.M. of the lunch meal preparation revealed [NAME] #501 and Dietary Aid #502 preparing food for the meal and neither worker were observed to have beard covers on, to cover their cheeks, upper lip, and chin hair while working in the kitchen . This observation was verified by Director of Dietary Quality Assurance #700. Interview on 11/13/24 at 11:45 A.M. with [NAME] #501 confirmed he should have had a beard cover on while cooking the food. Review of facility policy titled Employee Sanitary Practices, dated 04/04/19 and 03/01/19, revealed employees will wear hair restraints (hairnet, hat, and/or beard restraint) to prevent hair from contacting exposed food.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-11-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interviews, review of the facility's water management program, review of facility policy and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring of the water management program to control the spread of waterborne pathogens. This had the potential to affect all 40 residents. The census was 40. Findings include: Interview on 11/14/24 at 9:01 A.M. with the Facilities Director #450 confirmed the facility had performed a Legionella (bacteria that can cause a severe type of pneumonia) risk assessment in April of 2024. Review of the facility's binder titled Water Management, no date, on 11/14/24 at 9:01 A.M. revealed a list of team members and their responsibilities in the water management program, and a map to describe the water filtration system. There was no documented evidence provided to show the facility monitored physical controls, documented water temperatures, monitored disinfectant level controls, completed visual inspections, or environmental testing for waterborne pathogens in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a preadmission screening and record review (PASRR) document in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #29) of one reviewed for PASRR. The census was 40. Findings Include: Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her current diagnoses were nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage, osteoporosis, dementia, morbid obesity, polyosteoarthritis, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, anxiety disorder, hyperlipidemia, occlusion and stenosis of carotid artery, acute kidney failure, chronic kidney disease (stage III), post traumatic stress disorder, osteoarthritis, and major depressive disorder. Review of her minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/10/24, revealed she had a mild cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #29's progress notes, dated 09/12/24, revealed she was admitted to the facility from the hospital. Review of Resident #29's hospital documentation found the hospital completed a hospital exemption…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to the prescribing physician's orders. This affected two (#4 and #7) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The census was 40. Findings include: 1. Resident #4 had an admission date of 12/29/23 with diagnoses including: falls, depression, overactive bladder, hyperlipidemia, rosacea, abnormal gait/mobility, Parkinson's disease, and anxiety. Observation on 11/14/24 at 8:56 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #329 administered Carbidopa-Levodopa (used to treat symptoms of Parkinson's disease), extended release (ER), 25-100 mg, one tablet by mouth to Resident #4. Review of the electronic medication administration record (eMAR) on 11/14/24 at 8:57 A.M. revealed an order for Carbidopa-Levodopa ER, 25-100 mg, one tablet by mouth, give at 7:00 A.M. Review of the order summary report for Resident #4 on 11/14/24 at 10:00 A.M. revealed the following orders for Resident #4: Carbidopa-Levodopa ER, oral tablet 25-100 mg, give one tablet by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure pressure injury interventions were implemented in a timely manner for one (Resident's #11) of two resident's reviewed for pressure ulcers. Additionally, the facility failed to complete skin measurements and monitoring in a timely manner for two (Residents #11 and #29) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 40. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 10/04/24 with diagnoses including fracture of left femur, disruption of wound, edema, type II diabetes, chronic diastolic heart failure, osteoarthritis, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, rosacea, bilateral primary osteoarthritis of knee, anxiety, chronic pain, chronic kidney disease stage III, thrombophilia, gastro esophageal reflux disease, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and irritable bowel syndrome. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident weights were obtained as per dietician recommendations. This had the potential to affect two (#36 and #37) out of four reviewed for nutrition. The census was 40. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 08/26/24 diagnoses include severe fracture of the left femur, history of falling, dementia, severe cognitive deficits, and anemia. Resident required one person assist with activities of daily living. Review of Resident #37's plan of care revealed the resident will maintain adequate nutrition support as evidenced with no significant weight changes. Review of Resident #37's Nutrition/Dietary Note dated 09/18/24 revealed Resident #37 weighed 140.2 pounds triggering him for significant weight loss of 5.7% weight loss in one month. This was related to his decreased intakes and appetite. Medications to increase appetite have been ordered. Dietician…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, policy review and review of medication information from Medscape, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications by ensuring there was an adequate indicate for use for the use of an antipsychotic medication. This affected one (#7) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Additionally, the facility failed to adequately monitor behaviors for residents that were prescribed psychotropic medications. This affected two (Residents #7 and #29) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 40. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were Alzheimer's disease, insomnia, dementia, hypothyroidism, allergic rhinitis, depression, hypertension, intervertebral disc degeneration lumbar region, gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, pain, pure hypercholesterolemia, and postnasal drip. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents had an appropriate indication for the use of antibiotics. This affected one resident (#26) of five residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. The census was 40. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #26 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE], diagnoses included: vitamin D deficiency, myocardial infarction, hypertension, osteoporosis, obstructive sleep apnea, heart disease, and abnormal weight loss with a body mass index (BMI) of 19.9 or less, (normal healthy weight rage is BMI 18.5-24.9). Review of Resident #26's physician orders for January of 2024 revealed an order for Macrobid (antibiotic) oral capsule, 100 milligrams (mg), give one capsule by mouth, two times a day, for urinary tract infection (UTI), for five days. The order start date was 01/04/24, with a stop date of 01/09/24. The order was listed as completed. Review of Resident #26's Infection Report Form based on The McGeer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-06-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility staff failed to ensure the hood and filter system in the main kitchen and serving kitchen food production areas were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner to prevent the contamination of food. This had the potential to affect all 45 residents residing in the facility who consumed food prepared in the two areas. Findings include: On 05/31/22 at 8:45 A.M. observations during the kitchen tour revealed the main kitchen hood and filters above the stove were very dusty. Interview with Executive Chef #101 at the time of the observation verified the dust on the hood and filters and revealed they were last cleaned by a contracted company on 02/01/22. On 05/31/22 at 8:55 A.M. observation of the serving kitchen area revealed the hood and filters above the stove were very dusty. Interview with Dietary Director #100 at the time of the observation verified the areas were very dusty and indicated the hood and filters were last cleaned by a contracted company on 02/01/22. Review of the undated policy titled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-06-02 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility staff failed to ensure trash was covered in the main kitchen storage and production areas. The had the potential to affect all 45 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 05/31/22 at 8:45 A.M. observations during the kitchen tour revealed the main kitchen dry stock areas had a trash can full of trash with no lid near the sugar and flour storage bins. Interview with Executive Chef #101 at the time of the observation verified the trash can was full of trash with no cover and was not being currently used by staff. Continued observation in the main kitchen revealed a trash can half full of trash with no cover near the ovens in the food production area that was not in use by staff. Interview with Dietary Director #100 at the time of this observation verified the trash can was half full of trash with no cover near the ovens in the food production area. Review of the policy titled Waste Disposal, dated 2019 revealed that prior to disposal, all waste was kept covered in a leak-proof…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH