No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Wesleyan Village

807 West Ave, Elyria, OH 44035 · Non profit - Other · 99 certified beds · (440) 284-9000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0610) — most recent Jun 20244 immediate-jeopardy citations$219,798 in federal fines2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0610) — most recent Jun 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $219,798 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-12)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (66%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
673 E River St
Pharmacy
125 E Broad St Ste 109 · (440) 329-7300 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
715 Middle Ave · (440) 322-3125 · Call to confirm hours
Park
328 Broad St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.2%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.9%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms62.5%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.3%3.2%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened0.0%6.1%16.1%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication26.5%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.7%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.1%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control31.5%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.5%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.2%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine57.7%75.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission9.9%24.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit22.2%12.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.681.731.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.061.801.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 62 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

52.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
66.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.32U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF52.3%CMS range 42.1–64.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 6.8–15.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge66.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge57.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge61.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 3.8–11.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.151.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.36
RN hours/ resident / day
1.12
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.95
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.42
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.23
RN hoursweekends
66.0%
Total nursing turnover
44.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 77.2 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.95 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.59 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 66% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-02-27)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2022-05-16)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

54 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-06-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of medical records, review of facility self-reported incidents (SRI), interviews with staff, interview with family, interview with the Wound Care Certified Nurse Practitioner (WCCNP), interview with the Medical Director (MD), review of timecard punches and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from staff-to-resident physical and verbal abuse. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious injuries, negative health outcomes, and/or psychosocial harm when on 05/19/24 at approximately 5:30 P.M., the facility failed to recognize and appropriately respond to an allegation of staff-to-resident abuse when Registered Nurse (RN) #500 was witnessed by State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #465 and STNA #501 swearing and yelling at Resident #19. RN #500 removed Resident #19 from the dining room, took the resident to her room, slammed the door and remained alone in the room with Resident #19 for approximately 10 to 15 minutes. During this time, STNA #465 and STNA #501 heard RN #500 yelling and swearing at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, review of self-reported incidents (SRI), interviews with staff, interview with the Medical Director (MD), interview with the Wound Care Nurse Practitioner (WCCNP), review of staff schedules, review of the facility investigation and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of staff-to-resident abuse was accurately reported and thoroughly investigated to protect residents from further potential abuse. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious injuries, negative health outcomes, and/or psychosocial harm when on 05/19/24 at approximately 10:21 P.M. the Administrator filed an SRI for an injury of unknown origin after State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #465 and STNA #501 alleged verbal and physical abuse of Resident #19 by Registered Nurse (RN) #500. Resident #19 sustained nine separate wounds as a result of the incident. The facility failed to accurately file an SRI, failed to interview staff witnesses (STNA #465 and STNA #501) and medical providers regarding the potential cause of Resident #19 '…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-06-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of medical records, interviews with staff, review of hospital records, review of the Certificate of Death, review of the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services to prevent and subsequently promote healing and/or worsening of a facility acquired pressure ulcer. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious life-threatening harm, injuries, and/or death, when the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent the development of a facility acquired pressure ulcer, such as turning and repositioning and incontinence care for Resident #91, who was at risk for pressure ulcer development. Furthermore, the facility failed to timely and accurately complete skin assessments to identify the resident ' s pressure ulcer, failed to complete wound assessments and failed to provide the necessary care and treatments to promote healing and/or worsening of the wound.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interviews with facility staff, review of an incident report, review of the emergency medical technician (EMT) report, review of the hospital computed tomography scan (CT), review of the hospital emergency room (ER) documentation, and review of the facility policy titled Falls and Fall Risk, Managing, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and ensure care planned interventions to prevent falls were consistently implemented for one resident (#86) to prevent a fall with injury in the facility. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE] when Resident #86, who was admitted to the facility with a comminuted and mildly displaced fracture of the left greater trochanter and was assessed as a fall risk, was not provided adequate supervision to prevent an unwitnessed fall and as a result sustained an acute intracranial hemorrhage (bleeding in the brain). Additionally, a second resident (#07) was placed at risk for the potential for more than minimal harm that was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, hospital record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered treatments were provided to promote healing of a surgical wound. Actual Harm occurred when Resident #90's surgical wound was not assessed until five days after admission and had 60% slough over then wound, physician ordered treatments were not administered as ordered leading to infection of the surgical wound, requiring a seven-day hospitalization, treatment with intravenous antibiotics, and the placement of a wound vacuum for healing. Upon readmission to the facility, the facility failed to initiate the physician order for a wound vacuum for the surgical wound site for three days and then failed to apply and change as ordered. This affected one (#90) of four residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 86. Findings include: Review of Resident #90's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 04/05/24, with re-admission date of 04/29/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received timely incontinence care. This resulted in actual psychosocial harm when one resident (#40) was observed sitting in her wheelchair in her room. Resident #40 had a foul odor of urine and stool on her body, as well as her room. A blanket placed on the floor under Resident #40's wheelchair was saturated with urine, which was dripping onto the floor. Additionally, Resident #40 was wearing an adult brief and pull-up, both saturated in urine, as was a bed pad and blanket placed on the wheelchair seat under Resident #40. Resident #40 cried regarding the lack of incontinence care and stated it made her feel horrible. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure timely incontinence care for two (#34 and #62) additional residents reviewed for incontinence care. Lastly, the facility failed to ensure catheter care and monitoring was provided for one (#98) of three residents reviewed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment. This affected one resident (#11) of six residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus, heart failure, depression, panic disorder, insomnia, history of falling, restless leg syndrome, and migraine. Review of the Minimum Data Set annual assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #11 was cognitively intact. The resident required supervision or touching assistance for transfers and for walking ten feet once standing. Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed no documented information regarding the resident's bed linens. Interview on 02/24/25 at 3:41 P.M. with Resident #11 revealed staff never washed the resident's sheets. Resident #11 reported it had probably been approximately one month…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to assist residents in obtaining routine dental care. This affected one resident (#68) of two residents reviewed for dental care. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus, depression, anxiety, hypertension, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #68 was cognitively intact. The resident did not have any broken teeth or dentures. Review of the current physician orders for February 2025 identified an order dated 06/12/23 for may consult dental as needed. Review of Resident #68's medical record revealed no evidence the resident was ever offered or received routine dental services while residing in the facility. Interview on 02/24/25 at 9:39 A.M. revealed Resident #11…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #68 timely received an evaluation by therapy services for a motorized wheelchair. This affected one (Resident #68) of five residents reviewed for rehabilitation services. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus, depression, anxiety, hypertension, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #68 was cognitively intact. The resident was dependent on assistance from staff for activities of daily living. Review of Resident #68's general progress notes dated 08/07/24 and timed 5:51 P.M. revealed a nurse practitioner was in to see the resident. The resident requested to get a motorized wheelchair with a new order for a therapy consultation for a motorized wheelchair evaluation. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-11 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to have sufficient staffing to meet the care needs of all residents. This directly affected three (#4, #15, and #16) of five residents reviewed for staffing and had the potential to affect 18 (#5, #8, #12, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24, #25, #26, #27, #28, #29, #30, #31, and #45) additional residents residing on the fourth floor. The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus, muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, anxiety, and depression. Review of the Medicare five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #4 was cognitively intact. Review of the current physician orders for Resident #4 identified an order dated 09/22/24 for insulin lispro 100 units per milliliter solution…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident weights were obtained and monitored in accordance with physician orders, dietitian recommendations, and the plan of care. This affected two (#4 and #15) of three residents reviewed for weights. The facility census was 84. 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #4 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus, muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, anxiety, and depression. Review of the Medicare five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #4 was cognitively intact. Review of the current physician orders for Resident #4 identified an order dated 10/30/24 for weekly weights for four weeks and then monthly. Review of the plan of care dated 10/31/24 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to administer medications in accordance with physician orders. This affected two (#6 and #16) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include. 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident discharged on 11/05/24. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus, muscle weakness, unspecified age-related cataracts, and heart failure. Review of physician orders identified an order dated 09/27/24 for Olopatadine solution 0.2 percent (%) with instructions to instill one drop in both eyes one time per day for dry eyes. Review of the medication administration record (MAR) for Resident #6 revealed the eye drops were not administered on 09/27/24, 09/28/24, 09/29/24, 09/30/24, 10/01/24, 10/02/24, 10/05/24, 10/06/24, 10/10/24, 10/11/24, and 10/25/24. An interview on 12/09/24 at 2:56 P.M. with Regional Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to adequately monitor resident blood glucose levels for sliding scale insulin as ordered. This affected one (#4) of three residents reviewed for insulin administration. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus, muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, anxiety, and depression. Review of the current physician orders for Resident #4 identified an order dated 09/22/24 for insulin lispro 100 units per milliliter solution with instructions to inject the insulin per sliding scale before meals up to 10 units per dose. Review of the plan of care dated 10/31/24 revealed Resident #4 had a history of type II diabetes mellitus. Interventions included Accu-checks (blood glucose level monitoring) as ordered, administering medications as ordered, and monitoring blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. This affected one (#16) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included rheumatoid arthritis, pain in right shoulder, pain in left shoulder, chronic pain syndrome, peripheral vascular disease, muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, and heart failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #16 was cognitively intact. Review of the plan of care dated 10/23/24 identified Resident #16 had chronic pain related to arthritis and peripheral vascular disease. Interventions included administering pain medication as ordered. Review of the current physician orders for Resident #16 identified an order dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of shower schedules, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided adequate bathing as scheduled. This affected three (#212, #277, and #300) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 82. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #212 revealed an admission date of 03/14/24. Diagnoses include generalized weakness, hypertension, Alzheimer's dementia, depression, and elevated cholesterol. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #212 was assessed as severely cognitively impaired and required substantial/maximal assistance with showering and bathing as well as hygiene. Review of facility shower schedule revealed Resident #212 was scheduled for showers/baths every Monday and Friday on day shift. Review of the facility shower schedule for 06/01/24 through 08/26/24 revealed Resident #212 was scheduled to receive 25 showers/baths. Review of facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of a facility investigation, the facility failed to ensure a resident assessed and care planned for elopement was provided with adequate supervision to prevent elopement. This affected one (#212) out of three residents reviewed for elopements. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #212 revealed an admission date of 03/14/24. Diagnoses include generalized weakness, hypertension, Alzheimer's dementia, depression, and elevated cholesterol. Review of a care plan dated 03/29/24 revealed Resident #212 was care planned at risk for elopement as the resident wandered aimlessly. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #212 was assessed as severely cognitively impaired and was independently ambulatory. Review of an elopement risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #212 was assessed at high risk for elopement. Review of an investigation dated 08/17/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 38 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, medical record review and review of the facility assessment to provide competent support and care for the resident population, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff to meet the individualized needs of each specific resident. This affected three (#62, #40 and #34) of three residents reviewed for staffing. Additionally, the remaining 83 residents residing in the facility were placed at potential risk for not having their individualized needs met based on insufficient staffing resources necessary to provide competent support and care for the resident population. The facility census was 86. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #62 revealed an admission date of 07/27/22. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, and acquired absence of right lower leg below the knee. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #62 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-06-27 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and review of the facility assessment, the facility failed to accurately assess and identify the needed competent nursing staff resources, based on resident acuity, to meet the individualized needs of specific residents. This affected three (#62, #40 and #34) of three residents reviewed for staffing with the potential to affect the remaining 83 residents residing in the facility who required nursing staff to meet their care needs. The facility census was 86. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #62 revealed an admission date of 07/27/22. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, and acquired absence of right lower leg below the knee. Further review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 was dependent for transfers, toileting, and required substantial/maximum assistance for personal hygiene. Resident #62 was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were adequately maintained. This affected one (#67) of three residents reviewed for safe and homelike environment. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure common areas, accessible to residents, was free from mold. This had the potential to affect three (#49, #75 and #86) of three male residents identified by the facility as being independent with mobility and toileting. The facility census was 86. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #67 revealed an admission date of 03/05/24. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #67 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #67 had no impairment of the upper or lower extremities, used a walker and or a wheelchair for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide routine dressing changes to a central line for one (#62) of one resident reviewed for the care and treatment of a central line. The facility identified one resident with a central line. The facility census was 86. Findings include: Record review for Resident #62 revealed an admission date of 07/27/22 and a readmission date of 01/14/24. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus and acquired absence of right lower leg below the knee. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #62 had no impairment of the upper extremities and impairment on both sides of the lower extremities. Resident #62 required substantial/maximum assistance for personal hygiene and bed mobility. Resident #62 was at risk for pressure ulcers, had an unhealed pressure ulcer, one stage two and a diabetic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, policy review, review of the Ohio Department of Health's Certification and Licensure System website, and review of a local police report, the facility failed to ensure an incident of alleged resident-to-resident physical abuse between Resident #99 and Resident #101 was reported. This affected two (Residents #99 and #101) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 90. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #99 revealed an admission date of [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included delusional disorder, cognitive communication deficit, and atrial fibrillation. Resident #99 was transferred to a local hospital on [DATE] and did not return to the facility. Review of Resident #99's Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE], revealed she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine, indicating moderately impaired cognition. Resident #99 was noted to have delusions, verbal behaviors directed towards others on one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, policy review, review of the Ohio Department of Health's Certification and Licensure System website, and review of a local police report, the facility failed to ensure an incident of alleged resident-to-resident physical abuse between Resident #99 and Resident #101 was investigated. This affected two (Residents #99 and #101) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 90. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #99 revealed an admission date of [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included delusional disorder, cognitive communication deficit, and atrial fibrillation. Resident #99 was transferred to a local hospital on [DATE] and did not return to the facility. Review of Resident #99's Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE], revealed she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine, indicating moderately impaired cognition. Resident #99 was noted to have delusions, verbal behaviors directed towards others on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident showers were completed as planned. This affected three (Residents #05, #44, and #56) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 90. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #05's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/26/21. Medical diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, anxiety, depression, and anemia. Review of Resident #05's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 annual assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. Resident #05 was recorded to require supervision to partial/moderate assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) completion. Resident #05 was not identified as having any behaviors or rejection of care. Review of Resident #05's physician's order dated 03/15/24, revealed the resident was supposed to receive a shower twice weekly on Wednesday and Saturday on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-16 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #48 was served her physician-ordered diet which accommodated her dietary restrictions. This affected one (Resident #48) of three residents reviewed for dietary services. The facility census was 90. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 06/23/23. Medical diagnoses included end stage renal disease (ESRD) with dependence on renal dialysis, muscle weakness, type II diabetes mellitus, and muscle weakness. The record indicated Resident #48 was lactose intolerant. Resident #48 was hospitalized on [DATE] and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #48's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 quarterly assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. Review of Resident #48's interdisciplinary progress notes revealed a note dated 03/16/24 indicating ranch and blue…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-04 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure colostomy care and services were in place for Resident #99. This affected one (Resident #99) of three residents reviewed for changes in condition. The facility identified no current residents with a colostomy and/or ileostomy. The facility census was 86. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #99 revealed an initial admission date of 08/31/23. Resident #99 was hospitalized from [DATE] until he readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and did not return to the facility. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting the left non-dominant side and gastrostomy status. Review of Resident #99's care plan, initiated 08/31/23 and revised on 10/29/23, revealed the resident had an alteration in gastrointestinal status with an ostomy in place. The care plan stated to provide ostomy care as ordered. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and staff interviews and resident interviews the facility to ensure there was enough staff was available to meet resident needs timely. This affected three (Resident #27, #39 and #87) of five residents reviewed for staffing This had the potential to affect all 90 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility staffing schedules and posted staffing information from 12/01/23 through 12/14/23 revealed on 12/07/23 and 12/08/23 revealed there was only one state tested nursing aide (STNA) on third shift for the fourth floor (27 residents). On 12/09/23 and 12/12/23, there was one STNA on the fourth floor for three hours. Interview on 12/20/23 at 4:09 A.M. with Scheduler #319 verified on 12/07/23 and 12/08/23, there were only four STNAs in the building on third shift and there was only one STNA on the fourth floor for 27 residents. Scheduler #319 verified on 12/18/23, there was one STNA on the fourth floor from 3:00 P.M. to 6:30 P.M. and on 12/19/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with respect when her call light was not answered for greater than one hour. This affected one (Resident #27) of five residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 90. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included depression and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #27 had intact cognition. Resident #27 required substantial/maximum assistance from staff with toileting and dressing and required assistance from staff with bed mobility. Interview and observation on 12/14/23 at 10:47 A.M. with Resident #27 revealed she had to wait for three hours on 12/13/23 for the bed pan and she waited two hours again at night for her call light to be answered. Resident #27 turned her call light on at 9:48 A.M. and Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure incontinence care was provided to the residents in a timely manner. This affected two (Resident #39 and #87) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 90. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, and dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #39 had intact cognition. Resident #39 required partial to maximum assistance from two staff for toileting. Interview and observation on 12/14/23 at 10:55 A.M. with Resident #39 revealed she had had a bowel movement (BM) and had been soaked all morning. Resident #39 stated no staff had been in her room to assist her this morning and she had an accident. Her whole bed will need to be changed. At 11:00 A.M., State Tested Nursing Aide (STNA) #306…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff cleaned the food thermometer appropriately to prevent cross contamination or food borne illness. This had the potential to affect 19 (Residents #2, #6, #12, #14, #17, #19, #20, #32, #41, #45, #50, #52, #56, #60, #63, #69, #73, #78 and #79) residents residing on the fourth floor of the facility. The facility census was 85. Findings include: During an observation on 10/04/23 at 4:50 P.M., Dietary Aide (DA) #108 was serving the residents on the fourth floor their dinner meal. DA #108 obtained the facility thermometer located in a bucket on top of the meal cart. With the thermometer cover still in place, DA #108 dipped the thermometer in the sanitizing solution and shook off the excess solution. He then attempted to obtain the temperature of the hamburger patties on the steam table without removing the thermometer cover. DA #108 removed the cover, then checked the temperature of the hamburgers. Without sanitizing the thermometer, he proceeded to check the temperature of the potatoes. During interview on 10/04/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-05-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, review of the facility's policy, and staff interview the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen and dietary areas. This had the potential to affect all residents except one resident (#35) who received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 92. Findings include: 1. Tour of the kitchen on 05/09/22 between 9:12 A.M. through approximately 9:45 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #550 revealed dried reddish splashes on the wall where the commercial opener across from stove. DM #550 stated it may be minestrone soup from yesterday. The back wall near the slicer, which was not in use and covered, had several gnats or fruit flies on the wall. The bottom shelf of the prep table located back against the back wall had moderate amount of food debris and housed several long flat pans. The corner of the floor next to this prep table and corners along the wall of the back part of the kitchen had a moderate amount of debris and was dirty. The top of prep table where the robocoup and blender was housed had spilled white debris. DM #550 stated it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, facility policy review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the licensed nurses observed the residents consumed their medications. This affected two (Resident #63 and #74) of 22 residents observed in the initial pool sample and had the potential to affect the 20 residents (Resident #4, #5, #6, #7, #14, #22, #28, #29, #34, #44, #52, #53, #66, #72, #74, #77, #79, #80, #85, and #488) whom resided on the dementia care unit on the second floor. The facility census was 92. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #63's medical record identified the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] following a stoke with left sided hemiparesis, colon cancer, major depression and anxiety. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #63 was cognitively intact. Interview with Resident #63 on 05/09/22 at 12:29 P.M. stated the nursing staff frequently come in and set her medications in front of her and then…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-16 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents had a choice in their medication schedule and activities to attend. This affected two (Residents #42 and #63) of 22 residents regarding choices in their care and treatment. The facility census was 92. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #63's medical record revealed Resident #63 was admitted on [DATE] following a stroke with left sided hemiparesis, colon cancer, major depression, and anxiety. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #63 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #63's nursing note dated 05/07/22 at 7:35 P.M. revealed the nurse took Resident #63 her evening medication. Resident #63 yelled at the nurse regarding her Zoloft, Trazodone, and melatonin medications. The nurse educated Resident #63 that it was ordered at this time and the resident then began yelling at this nurse and refused to take medication. Review of Resident #63's medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-16 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the appropriate state agency (The Ohio Department of Mental Health) of a significant change in a resident's mental health condition as required. This affected one (Resident #71) of two residents reviewed for preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR). The facility census was 92. Findings Include: Review of Resident #71's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included depression, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and hypertension. The resident was later diagnosed with unspecified psychosis while residing in the facility on 10/15/21. Review of the psychiatric consult note for Resident #71 dated 11/04/21 revealed Resident #71 was very paranoid, agitated, and irritable with exhibited anger outbursts, yelling, and physical aggression. Review of both the electronic and hard charts revealed no evidence the appropriate state agency (The Ohio Department of Mental Health) was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, review of the facility's policy, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents whom were dependent on staff with activities of daily living (ADL) care were assisted with nail care. This affected two (Resident #35 and #38) of two residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility identified 81 residents who required assistance from staff with hygiene. The facility census was 92. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed an admission to the facility occurred on 02/28/22. Diagnoses included a stroke, heart attack, COVID-19, and anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 had impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for personal hygiene. Review of Resident #35's written plan of care (POC) for activities of daily living (ADL's) revealed to check nail length and trim and clean on bath day and as necessary. Review of the shower schedule for Resident #35 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were timely implemented for a resident. This affected one (Resident #35) of 22 residents reviewed for physician orders. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed an admission to the facility occurred on 02/28/22. Diagnoses included stroke, heart attack, hyperglycemia (high blood sugar), and moderate protein calorie nutrition. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 had impaired cognition Review of Resident #35's physicians order dated 03/02/22 revealed blood sugar levels were to be obtained four times a day. On 04/22/22, there was an order to decrease the accu checks (blood sugars) to twice a day. Review of Resident #35's Medication Administration Records (MAR) for March 2022, April 2022, and May 2022 revealed blood sugar levels were being checked four times a day from 03/02/22 to 05/10/22.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, and family and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for a resident. This affected one (Resident #33) of two residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 02/25/22. Diagnoses included dementia, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/02/22, revealed Resident #33 had impaired cognition and was dependent for transfers, locomotion, and ambulation. Review of the fall risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #33 was at a high risk for falls. Review of the plan of care dated 03/03/22 revealed Resident #33 was at a risk for falls due to a decline in physical and cognitive function. Interventions on 03/24/22 included orders for Low profile mat to exit side of bed. Review of the nurse's notes dated 04/09/22, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-16 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, review of the facility's dietitian recommendation protocol, and staff interviews, the facility failed to timely implement a registered dietitian's (RD) recommendation to increase a rate in tube feeding to increase the caloric intake of a resident. This affected one (Resident #35) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility identified one resident with a feeding tube. The facility census was 92. Finding include: Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed an admission to the facility occurred on 02/28/22. Diagnoses included a stroke, heart attack, respiratory failure, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, and history of COVID-19. Resident #35 was listed at 149 pounds upon admission on [DATE]. Review of the hospital records prior to admission revealed Resident #35 was hospitalized with COVID-19 starting on 12/14/21. Resident #35 subsequently had a stroke and heart attack. The hospital records identified his weight was listed at 190 pounds on 12/14/22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of medscape.com guidance and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's blood pressure medications were not administered close together. This medication has the potential to significantly drop blood pressure and was a significant medication error. This affected one (Resident #35) of six residents reviewed for blood pressure medications. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed an admission to the facility occurred on 02/28/22. Diagnoses included COVID-19, stroke, and heart attack. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #35's medication administration record (MAR) for April and May 2022 revealed Resident #35 was receiving Carvedilol (Coreg-Blood pressure medication), scheduled upon rising and at lunch time. The was noted to be at 8:00 A.M. and 12:00 P.M. There were no parameters to hold the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-16 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, review of the facility's policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received adaptive equipment at meals according the physician's order. This affected two (Resident #71 and #19) of two residents who received adaptive eating equipment. The facility identified ten residents (#10, #19, #31, #57, #70, #71, #72, #76, #442 and #445) who used adaptive equipment in the facility. The facility census was 92. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #71 revealed an admission date of 02/13/20. Diagnoses included chronic pulmonary disease, rheumatoid arthritis, vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance, and major depressive disorder. Review of the care plan dated 01/06/22 revealed Resident #71 had a potential nutritional problem related to diagnoses. Interventions included built up utensils and two handle sip cup with straw. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 02/02/22, revealed Resident #71 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-16 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean, functional and safe environment for the residents. This affected four (Resident #10, #35, #36, and #71) of 92 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 92. Findings include: 1. Observation of Resident #36's room on 05/09/22 at 8:04 A.M. revealed the cove molding was missing and falling off behind Resident #36's bed, with part of the dry wall missing. The observation further revealed the wall located behind a soft chair in the room was observed with a large hole in the dry wall and cracked and crumbling dry wall. 2. Observation of Resident #35's room on 05/09/22 at 10:02 A.M. revealed the room had a window behind the resident's bed that was broken. The window had a hole in the center of the window and was spider shattered from the top to the bottom. Interview with Maintenance Director #103 on 05/12/22 at 7:18 A.M. confirmed the window was broken in Resident #35's room and he was not sure when this occurred but does not have a window to replace it. Maintenance Director #103 confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-05-09 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of resident council minutes, review of facility policy, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident concerns were followed up on. In addition, residents were not informed on how to file a grievance. This affected eleven (#42, #28, #31, #5, #51, #12, #39, #72, #71, #20, #59) of eleven residents interviewed. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of the Resident Council Minutes dated 02/14/19, 03/14/19 and 04/11/19 revealed the residents had expressed concerns with missing dentures, call lights answered timely, and two residents with complaints of no hot water in their rooms. Interview with Residents (#42, #28, #31, #5, #51, #12, #39, #72, #71, #20, #59) on 05/07/19 at 2:44 P.M. during meeting with the Resident Council Members revealed the residents did not feel the staff got back with them wherever they expressed a concern. They reported having the same issues repeatedly and nothing has changed and were not given responses to their concerns at their meetings. In addition, the residents reported not knowing where to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-09 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a preferred bathing list, review of an activities of daily living verification sheet, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to honor a resident's choice to take a shower. This affected one (#47) of one resident reviewed for choices. The facility census was 73. Findings include Review of Resident #47's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included anxiety disorder, depressive disorder, contractures of the left ankle, right knee and left knee, hypertension, type two diabetes mellitus, osteoarthritis and osteoporosis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) annual assessment preference for customary routine and Activities dated 03/29/19 revealed in the interview for daily preferences Resident #47 indicated it was very important for her to choose between a tub bath, shower, bed bath or sponge bath. Further review of the annual assessment revealed the resident had mild cognitive impairment. Review of the Residents Preferred…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-05-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the electronic medical record face sheet, review of a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) identification form, review of a quarterly resident review form, review of the plan of care, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to obtain a physician order to honor a resident's right not to receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This affected one (#20) of two resident reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 73. Findings include Review of the medical record revealed Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included altered mental status, muscle weakness, repeated falls, restless leg syndrome, and spinal stenosis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #20 had intact cognition. Review of the electronic health record and review of the paper medical chart revealed no signed physician order on a DNR identification form. Review of electronic health record states face sheet resident revealed Resident #20…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-05-09 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide written notification of transfer/discharge to the hospital or the responsible party. This affected one Resident (#76) reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, anxiety disorder, hyperlipidemia, anorexia, and dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of the nursing progress note dated 02/28/19, revealed Resident #76 was transferred to the hospital. Review of the nursing progress notes dated 02/28/19, revealed no documentation of the facility providing written notification to the resident or the responsible party. Interview on 05/09/19 at 11:54 A.M., with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #143 revealed they did not provide written notification regarding the reason for transfer/discharge to the hospital, to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-05-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual (RAI), the facility failed to accurately complete comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. This affected two residents (#19 and #46) of 26 residents reviewed for comprehensive MDS assessments during the annual survey. The facility census was 73. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 06/04/17. Diagnoses included dementia, anxiety, and hypertension. Review of Resident #19's comprehensive annual MDS assessment, dated 06/03/18, section L0200 B, did not indicate the resident had no natural teeth or tooth fragments. Review of the residents comprehensive significant change MDS assessment, dated 02/25/19, section L0200 B, also did not indicate the resident had no natural teeth or tooth fragments. L0200 B was not coded on either assessment. Observation on 05/06/19 at 8:56 P.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-05-09 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to submit an application to the state Pre-admission Screening Resident Review (PASRR) (determines whether or not an individual who has an active diagnosis of mental illness or intellectual/developmental disability meets the criteria for admission and/or continued stay in a nursing facility) after a resident experienced a significant mental health change. This affected on resident (#72) of two residents (#72 and #46) reviewed for PASRR. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #72 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder and bowel, urinary tract infection, Diabetes, osteoporosis, anxiety, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #72's pre-admission review results, dated 07/10/15, revealed the resident did not have indications of serious mental illness nor a developmental disability. Review of a Resident #72's physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-05-09 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the discharge needs of residents were met. This affected one (Resident #74) of three residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 74. Findings Include: Review of Former Resident (FR) #74's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/15/19 and discharged on 02/24/19. Medical diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, dysphagia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, anxiety, depression, paraplegia, urogenital implants, and chronic pain syndrome. Review of FR #74's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a high cognitive function. The resident required extensive assistance in all activities of daily living except eating which he/she was independent. Review of FR #74's medical record revealed a physician order dated 02/23/19 to discharge to home on [DATE]. Review of FR #74's medical record revealed no discharge documentation was completed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-05-09 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received assistance with showering and personal hygiene. This affected one resident (Resident #32) of three residents reviewed. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia and unspecified intellectual disabilities. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/22/19, revealed the resident was cognitively impaired. The resident required set up help, supervision, and/or oversight for grooming and bathing. Review of the most recent plan of care, dated 04/25/19, revealed the resident had a self care deficit but was fairly independent. Interventions included for staff to provide verbal cues throughout tasks to promote independence, provide instructions and directions for the resident to complete the task giving one or two steps at at time to reduce confusion, to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the bathing schedule, review of the Activities of Daily Living Verification Worksheet, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident received scheduled bathing. This affected one (#47) of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 73. Findings include Review of the medical record revealed Resident #47 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included anxiety disorder, depressive disorder, contractures of the left ankle, right knee and left knee, hypertension, type two diabetes mellitus, osteoarthritis and osteoporosis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) annual assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 was dependent on staff for bathing. Further review of the annual assessment revealed the resident had mild cognitive impairment. Review of resident bath schedule, posted on a clipboard at nurses station, noted Resident #47 was bathed on Monday and Thursdays on day shift. Review of the Activities of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure a physician responded timely to a resident's change in condition. This affected one (Resident #24) of three residents reviewed for urinary tract infections. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/08/19. Diagnoses included cervical fracture, nasal bone fracture, orbital fracture, sacral fracture, vertebra fracture, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, urinary retention, and pseudobulbar effect. Review of Resident #24's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a moderate cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance with all activities of daily living. Review of Resident #24's nurses note dated 04/22/19 revealed the resident had a change in condition. Resident #24 was noted to have increased lethargy, sleeping through the day, and refused therapy due to not feeling well. In addition the resident complained of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to complete a smoking assessment to determine a resident's ability to safely smoke and manage smoking materials as identified in the facility policy. This affected one (Resident #34) of one resident reviewed for smoking. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of Resident #34's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/13/19. Diagnoses included cerebral vascular accident, right femur fracture, diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Review of Resident #34's Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed the resident had a moderate cognition deficit, utilized a wheelchair and had no upper extremity limitations. Review of Resident #34's most recent care plan revealed the resident had no plans or interventions for smoking. Review of Resident #34's nurses note dated 05/04/19 revealed cigarette smoke was noted near and outside of the resident's room. Resident #34 was not noted to have smoking material in his/her room. The resident was advised to let nursing know if he/she would wish to smoke so…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to provide physician ordered treatment for Resident #72's supra-pubic catheter. This affected one resident (#72) of four residents reviewed for catheters. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #72 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, and urine retention. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 04/16/19, revealed the resident was cognitively intact and had an indwelling catheter. Review of the resident's orders revealed on 04/23/19 the physician ordered the resident's supra-pubic catheter tube to be flushed with 60 milliliters of sterile saline daily. Review of Resident #72's April and May 2019 Treatment Administration Records (TAR) revealed no evidence the resident's catheter tube was flushed on 04/25/19, 04/28/19, 05/01/19, 05/03/19,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-05-16 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the all survey results in the past three years were available for residents, family members, and/or legal representatives of residents to review. This had the potential to affect all 92 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observation of the facility's front lobby area on 05/11/22 at 9:51 A.M. revealed there was a shelf with a binder titled, Survey Results. The last survey that was in the binder was 06/30/21. Review of the Ohio Department of Health (ODH) surveys revealed ODH conducted the following surveys at the facility on the following dates: on 02/25/22, a complaint survey; on 02/09/22, a complaint survey; on 01/05/22, a complaint survey; on 12/22/21, a follow up survey; on 12/01/22, a complaint survey with violations issued; on 11/17/21, a follow up survey; on 10/19/21, a complaint survey with violations issued; on 09/07/21, a complaint survey; on 08/19/21, a complaint survey with violations issued. On 05/11/22 at 9:51 A.M., an interview with Administrator #207 verified the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · C2019-05-09 · tag F0574 — widespread
    The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents knew where to find the ombudsman contact information. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Observations on 05/06/19, 05/07/19, and 05/08/19 of the facility revealed no findings of the Ombudsman contact information posted in the facility. Interview with Residents (#42, #28, #31, #5, #51, #12, #39, #72, #71, #20, #59) on 05/07/19 at 2:44 P.M. during meeting with the Resident Council Members reported not knowing where to find the ombudsman contact information. Interview with the Activities Director #900 on 05/07/19 at 1:16 P.M. verified there were no ombudsman contact information posted.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$219,798 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $197,458 — penalty dated 2024-06-12
  • $22,340 — penalty dated 2023-11-03
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-07-23 for 7 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-12-01 for 38 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
AMERICAN EAGLE WESLEYAN HOLDING, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 12/03/2020
WESLEYAN SENIOR CARE, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 12/03/2020
KHAN, KASHIFIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/03/2019
RITCHIE, JENNIFERIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/28/2025
WEISZ, MORDECHAIIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/03/2019
GEWIRTZMAN, ELIEZERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/03/2019
LAHASKY, EPHRAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/03/2019
LAHASKY, EVANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/03/2019
WV HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/03/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$18.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-17.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 26%Medicare 6%Other / private 68%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$698per resident / day
operating cost
$21,224per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$594per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365162. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next