Heritage Healthcare of Euclid
3 Gateway Dr, Euclid, OH 44119 · For profit - Corporation · 75 certified beds · (216) 486-4949 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568, F0569)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.7% | 5.3% | 15.4% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 12.5% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 10.5% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 7.0% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.1% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 4.7% | 25.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.5% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.9% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.5% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.4% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 64.3% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 75 beds and averages 65.7 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.38 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.55 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
50 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2024-04-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure individualized care planned interventions were developed and followed to prevent Resident #17 from developing pressure ulcers, and failed to ensure the pressure ulcers were timely identified, properly treated, and interventions were initiated to promote healing. Actual Harm occurred on 01/06/24 when Resident #17 who was cognitively impaired, at risk for pressure ulcer development, and required assistance with bed mobility, developed new, in-house acquired bilateral heel pressure ulcers that were first assessed to be unstageable (a type of bed sore that occurred due to prolonged pressure on a specific area of the skin, resulting in the lack of blood flow and oxygen to the tissue. It is a full thickness tissue loss where the depth of the wound or bed sore was completely obscured by eschar in the wound bed) without proper prevention, treatment, and interventions implemented. This affected one resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment. This affected six residents (#1, #4, #14, #16, #41, and #54) of six residents reviewed for environment and had the potential to affect all 68 residents residing in thee facility. The facility census was 68.Findings include:Observation on 12/03/25 at 11:03 A.M. of Resident #4 in his room sitting in his wheelchair wearing a coat and hat. Interview at this time with Resident #4 stated it was cold in the building, and they needed to turn on the heat.Interview on 12/03/25 at 11:16 A.M. with Resident #54 stated it was cold at night in his room and staff would get him another blanket that helped. Observation of Resident #54's room revealed long black marks and gashes in the wall near the entrance into the room. Resident #54 stated they were supposed to paint the walls and stated they had re-did the bathroom. Observation of the bathroom revealed it appeared to have been updated but was missing the baseboard along the wall. Interview on 12/03/25 at 11:24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #29 received timely incontinence care and was free from skin breakdown. This affected one resident (Resident #29) out of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of Resident #29's medical record revealed and admission date of 12/18/20 and diagnoses included cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of unspecified cerebral artery, major depressive disorder, and unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety. Review of Resident #29's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed A Brief Interview for Mental Status was not completed due to resident was rarely or never understood. Resident #29 was dependent for toileting, bathing, and personal hygiene. Resident #29 was frequently incontinent of urine and always incontinent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance for water management, the facility failed to provide evidence of water testing conducted to monitor and prevent the growth of Legionella (a bacteria that causes Legionnaire's disease) in the building water system. This had the potential to affect all 65 residents in the facility. The census was 65. Findings Include: During the entrance conference, the facility was asked to provide a copy of the Legionella water management program and evidence of water testing being conducted. The facility provided the policy titled, Legionella Water Management Program, revised September 2022; however, the facility had no evidence to support that regular testing for Legionella was being done in the building. Interview on 06/27/24 at 12:50 P.M. with the Administrator verified the facility had no documented evidence of water testing related to Legionella prevention. During a follow up interview on 06/27/24 at 1:00 P.M., Maintenance Director (MD) #915 indicated the facility did conduct…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, review of a State Fire Marshal report, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, sanitary, and well maintained environment and equipment. This had the potential to affect all 65 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 65. Findings Include: 1. An environmental tour was conducted on 06/26/24 between 9:30 A.M. and 9:45 A.M. with Maintenance Director (MD) #915. Observation of the carpeting throughout the facility was significant discolored and stained. The ceiling in the 400 hall dining room area was completely ripped off and plastic sheeting was covering the ceiling to prevent debris from falling. One of the walls of the dinning room was completely taken down to the wooden studs. Observation of the 300 and 400 Hall tub room had drilled out holes in the shower room that were directly in front of the room. The holes exposed rusted pipes and numerous cob webs. Observation of the ceiling light about the 100 and 200 Hall nurses' station did not have a cover. The 100 and 200 Hall tub room had a noted brown…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure insulin was dated when opened, was stored in the container for the resident it was ordered for, and was disposed of once expired. This affected five (#13, #15, #26, #33, and #40) of thirteen residents who receive insulin. The census was 65. Findings include: 1. Observation on [DATE] at 3:14 P.M. revealed a used injector pen of Humalog insulin for Resident #33 was stored in a medication cart. The pen was open and in use with no date written when use began. Interview during the observation with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #905 stated all insulin pens should be dated when initially opened and verified Resident #33's insulin injector pen was not dated. 2. Observation on [DATE] at 3:23 P.M. revealed a used injector pen of Lispro insulin for Resident #13 and Resident #15 were stored in a medication cart. The pens were open and in use with no date written when use began. Further observation of the medication cart revealed an open…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to store food in a safe and sanitary manner. This affected six (#3, #10, #44, #48, and #172) of 31 residents residing on the 300 and 400 units. The census was 65. Findings include: Observation on 06/24/24 at 3:14 P.M. revealed four containers of applesauce that were not dated and a container of pudding dated 06/20/24 were sitting in the top drawer of the medication cart. The containers were warm to the touch. Another container of applesauce dated 06/20/24 was currently provided to residents who had difficulty swallowing medications. Interview on 06/24/24 at 3:20 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #905 stated the containers of applesauce and pudding were in the medication cart when she arrived, so she used them. LPN #905 removed all containers from the cart and stated the containers should have been dated. The facility identified six (#3, #10, #44, #48, and #172) residents who utilized applesauce or pudding with medication administration on the 300 and 400 units. Review of the facility policy titled,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to treat residents with dignity while feeding. This affected one resident (#48) of three residents who were provided assistance with feeding. The facility census was 65. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 12/18/20. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, seizures, dementia, and dysphasia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/17/24, revealed Resident #48 had severely impaired cognition. Review of Resident #48's physician orders for June 2024 revealed an order for feeding assist with all meals on 01/24/24 and the resident was ordered a dysphasia puree texture diet on 04/22/24. Observation on 06/25/24 at 12:29 P.M. revealed Resident #48 in was in a Broda chair (a chair designed to tilt and recline for comfort and mobility) with a plate of puree food on the table. Observation and interview on 06/25/24 at 12:41 P.M. revealed State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #909 was standing beside Resident #48 while feeding her.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of resident funds accounts, and staff interview, the facility failed to make final dispersal of resident funds within 30 days of a resident's death. This affected one (#219) of one residents reviewed for final dispersal of resident funds. The facility census was 65. Findings Include: Review of Resident #219's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and expired on [DATE]. Review of Resident #219's resident funds account revealed a check dated [DATE] for $90.56 was sent to the Attorney General and a check dated [DATE] for $1,768.00 was sent to to cover the balance due on the resident's account. Interview on [DATE] at 2:25 P.M. with the Administrator verified Resident #219's personal funds were not disbursed within 30 days after the resident's death as required. The Administrator stated they were aware there was a problem getting the checks out within the 30 day timeframe.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of self-reported incidents, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse, neglect, or injury of unknown origin to the State Survey Agency as required. This affected one (#67) of two residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 65. Findings Included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure, high blood pressure, and nicotine dependence. Resident #67 discharged from the facility against medical advice (AMA) on 04/17/24. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #67 was cognitively intact and required one person physical assistance for completing activities of daily living. Review of a progress note dated 04/16/24 at 8:00 A.M. revealed Resident #67 was observed in room during tray pass for breakfast and it was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to electronically transmit encoded, accurate, and complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) system within 14 days of completing the assessment. This affected one (#2) of three residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 65. Findings: Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed a discharge MDS assessment dated [DATE] had been completed but not transmitted as of 06/24/24. Resident #2 was discharged from the facility after he failed to return from an authorized leave of absence (LOA) on 01/01/24. During interview on 06/26/24 at 1:15 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON), Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #905, and Social Worker #922 confirmed Resident #2 left on an authorized leave of absence and did not return. Follow up interview on 06/26/24 at 1:40 P.M., the DON confirmed Resident #2's discharge MDS assessment had not been transmitted until 06/26/24.
Show the remaining 39 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I screen was completed after a resident remained in the facility longer than 30 days as required. This affected one (#13) of two residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 65. Findings Include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizophrenia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and high blood pressure. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 was cognitively intact and required minimum assistance for completing his activities of daily living. Review of the medical record revealed a PASARR was completed for Resident #13's stay in the facility on 04/09/24. Social Worker (SW) #922 verified Resident #13's PASARR was not completed timely as required in an interview on 06/26/24 at 1:30 P.M.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to timely act upon pharmacist recommendations to address any medication irregularities in the medical record. This affect one (#40) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 65. Findings Include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included visual hallucinations, repeated falls, and bipolar disorder. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #40 was moderately cognitively impaired and required the assistance of one staff person for completing her activities of daily living. Review of a pharmacist recommendation dated 03/04/24 revealed Resident #40 had a physician's order dated 03/16/23 for the medication carvedilol (medication used to treat high blood pressure) with instructions to give 6.25 milligrams (mg) by mouth two times a day for hypertension (high blood pressure) and hold…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to adequate monitoring was completed as ordered prior to the administration of a medication. This affected one (#40) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 65. Findings Include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included visual hallucinations, repeated falls, and bipolar disorder. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #40 was moderately cognitively impaired and required the assistance of one staff person for completing her activities of daily living. Review of a physician order dated 03/16/23 revealed Resident #40 was ordered carvedilol (medication used to treat high blood pressure) with instructions to give 6.25 milligrams (mg) by mouth two times a day for hypertension (high blood pressure) and hold for systolic blood pressure (SBP) below…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident's #1, #24 and #55 received proper, timely incontinence care. This affected three resident's (Resident's #1, #24 and #55) out of four resident's reviewed for incontinence care. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #55's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/04/22 and diagnoses included cerebral infarction, pseudobulbar affect, and type two diabetes mellitus with ketoacidosis without coma. Review of Resident #55's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed Resident #55's Brief Inteview for Mental Status was not assessed. Resident #55 was always incontinent of urine and bowel. Resident #55 was dependent for all ADL's (Activity of Daily Living) including toileting and personal hygiene. Review of Resident #55's care plan revised 05/18/22 included Resident #55 experienced bowel incontinence. Resident #55's toileting needs would be met by staff, with interventions aimed at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-11 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #45 had an individualized care plan with appropriate interventions in place to manage symptoms of dementia to prevent wandering in other residents rooms. This affected one resident (Resident #45) out of three resident reviewed for dementia care. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of Resident #45's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/22/23 and diagnoses included dementia, major depressive disorder, and morbid obesity. Review of Resident #45's Quarterly MDS 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #45 had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #45 used a manual wheelchair. Resident #45 was independent for bed mobility, the ability to transfer from a bed to a wheelchair, and the ability to come to a standing position from sitting in a wheelchair or the side of the bed. Review of Resident #45's care plan revised 01/24/24 included Resident #45 had impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were in place for care or treatment of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line. This affected one (Resident #11) of one facility-identified residents with a PICC line. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 02/20/24 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, epilepsy, cerebral infarction, and mixed hyperlipidemia. Review of progress note for Resident #11 dated 02/20/24 revealed the resident was admitted to facility with a PICC line to left arm used to administer medication to treat endocarditis. Review of physician's orders for Resident #11 revealed an order dated 02/21/24 for 100 milliliters (ml) daily of ceftriaxone sodium intravenously for 28 days. Review of the physician's orders revealed there were no orders for care and treatment of the of the PICC line site. Review of the plan of care for Resident #11…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident safety during a two-staff assisted transfer. This affected one (Resident #30) of three reviewed for safe transfers. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed admission date of 05/14/23 with diagnoses including convulsions, migraine, fatigue, anxiety disorder, hyperlipidemia, and major depressive disorder. Review of plan of care for Resident #30 dated 05/17/23 revealed the required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Interventions included the resident required weight-bearing assistance including holding, lifting, or supporting the trunk or limbs and required non-weight bearing assistance including steadying, contact guard assistance or guided maneuvering when transferring between surfaces. Review of the therapy progress note for Resident #30 dated 09/13/23 revealed the resident was working with the occupational therapy department at the facility and required moderate assistance to sit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide privacy during incontinence care. This affected two of three sampled residents (#13 and #35), one which was observed during a random observation. The facility census was 60. Findings include: 1. Observation from the hallway outside of Resident #13's room on 08/30/23 at 6:01 A.M. revealed State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #200 providing incontinence care to Resident #13. The door to Resident #13's room was open and the privacy curtain was not pulled around the bed. Resident #13 was not interviewable. 2. Observation of incontinence care on 08/30/23 at 6:12 A.M. with STNA #200 for Resident #35 revealed STNA #200 did not close the door or pull the privacy curtain prior to beginning incontinence care. Interview with STNA #200 at time of observation revealed the door and/or the privacy curtain should have been closed prior to beginning incontinence care. Resident #35 was not interviewable. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00145488.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure timely incontinence care was provided. This affected one resident (#58) of two observed for incontinence care. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of Resident #58's medical records revealed an admission date of 06/28/22. Diagnoses included muscle weakness and dementia. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #58 had intact cognition, required extensive assistance with toileting and was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of Resident #58's care plan dated 07/19/23 revealed Resident #58 was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Interventions included provide incontinence care every two hours and as needed. Observation of incontinence care on 08/30/23 at 6:48 A.M. with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #205 and #206 for Resident #58 revealed Resident #58 was incontinent of a large of amount of urine and stool. Further observation revealed Resident #58 was wearing an incontinence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-04-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure it was sufficiently staffed to meet the needs of the residents. This had the potential to affect all 54 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Interview with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #801 on 04/10/22 at 10:10 A.M. revealed the facility has no idea how to staff correctly and it's a struggle to get work completed. 2. Interview with Resident #47 on 04/10/22 at 12:33 P.M. revealed there is not enough staff, and staff just sits at the desk and ignores what the resident needs. 3. Interview with Resident #45 on 04/10/22 at 2:20 P.M. revealed the facility is understaffed, and call light response is poor. 4. Interview with Resident #40 on 04/10/22 at 2:34 P.M. noted Resident #40 commenting on the need for more staff, and staff often looking overwhelmed and overlooking basic aspects of care. 5. Interview with Resident #15 on 04/10/22 at 2:41 P.M. revealed there is not enough staff because it takes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-04-20 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the Facility Assessment, the facility failed to ensure sufficient dietary staffing to provide residents with a dignified dining experience. This affected 52 of 54 residents who consumed meals in the facility. Two (Resident's #37 and #249) received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Observation of breakfast tray line on 04/10/22 at 7:45 A.M. revealed there was one cook and one dietary aide in the kitchen. They were serving breakfast on paper products, and no adaptive equipment was given to residents during the meal. [NAME] #815 and Dietary Aide #816 revealed they were using paper products because they were the only two dietary staff scheduled for the weekend, and they can't do what they normally do when there were three staff on duty. [NAME] #815 stated there are two dietary staff that work 12-hour shifts on the weekend. The two dietary staff had to prepare, serve, and clean up for all three meals. When they asked for more assistance, the dietary manager would say it wasn't in the budget.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-04-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean, safe, and sanitary environment throughout the facility. This affected 26 (Residents #3, #7, #11, #12, #14, #16, #19, #20, #21, #22, #25, #27, #31, #32, #34, #35, #38, #41, #43, #44, #45, #46, #251, #252, #253 and #254) and had the potential to affect all 54 residents in the facility. Findings include: 1. On 04/10/22 from 7:41 A.M. to 8:32 A.M., observations of the facility revealed no door thresholds in place for the main doors leading to the nursing units and no door thresholds in place for the rooms of Resident's #7, #11, #12, #14, #27, #32, #35, #41, #44, #45, #46, #252, and #253. On 04/10/22 at 3:15 P.M., interview with Maintenance Director #804 verified the missing door thresholds. He stated the door thresholds were removed for safety due to being loose. 2. On 04/10/22 from 7:41 A.M. to 10:56 A.M., observations of the facility revealed stained carpeting in the hallways, torn carpeting in the hallway on the 100-unit, a cracked tile in Resident #25's room, and dirty carpet in Resident #251's room. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach and accessible. This affected five (Resident's #20, #31, #34, #35 and #43) of 54 residents reviewed for call light placement. The facility census was 54. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including atherosclerotic heart disease, mixed hyperlipidemia, and osteoarthritis. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #20 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance of one staff for mobility, toilet, and personal hygiene. Observation of Resident #20 on 04/10/22 at 11:08 A.M. revealed Resident #20 was lying in bed with his eyes open. The call light was noted to be out of reach of Resident #20. Review of the care plans dated 10/28/21 with a revision date of 03/08/22 revealed Resident #20 had a potential risk for falls related to decreased mobility and incontinent of bowel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-20 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure resident and/or responsible parties received quarterly statements of resident personal needs account activity as required. This affected seven (Resident's #8, #16, #17, #25, #29, #30 and #31) of seven residents reviewed for personal funds. This had the potential to affect 13 additional residents (Resident's #3, #6, #7, #9, #11, #12, #14, #15, #20, #27, #32, #33 and #47) who also had personal needs bank accounts at the facility. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Review of the resident funds list provided by the facility during the annual survey beginning on 04/10/22 revealed 20 (Resident's #8, #16, #17, #25, #29, #30, #31, #3, #6, #7, #9, #11, #12, #14, #15, #20, #27, #32, #33 and #47) had an account that was actively managed by the facility. Review of seven (Resident's #8, #16, #17, #25, #29, #30 and #31) of the 20 personal funds accounts revealed no documented evidence was provided by the facility indicating the residents and/or responsible parties were given a quarterly statement of transactions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-20 · tag F0569 — patternNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facilities failed to notify residents when their resident funds accounts were within $200.00 of the Medicaid resource limit as required. This affected four (Resident's #8, #29, #30 and #31) of six residents reviewed for personal funds. The facility census was 54. Findings include: 1. Review of the banking records for Resident #8 revealed she had a current balance of $5,236.13 and was over the Medicaid resource limit of $2,000 as of 02/23/22. Further review of the banking records for Resident #8 on 04/12/22 revealed no notification of spend down was provided to the resident as required. The facility provided a spend down letter which was signed by Resident #8 on 04/12/22. 2. Review of the banking records for Resident #29 revealed she had a current balance of $2,560.73 and was over the Medicaid resource limit of $2,000 as of 02/23/22. Further review of the banking records for Resident #29 on 04/12/22 revealed no notification of spend down was provided to the resident as required. The facility provided a spend down letter which was signed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-20 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure hospitalized residents on leave of absence from the facility were given copies of resident bed hold status as required. This affected four (Resident's #18, #34, #35 and #41) of four residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 54. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia, type two diabetes, and muscle weakness. Review of the census records for Resident #18 revealed he was sent to and admitted to an acute care hospital on [DATE]. Resident #41 returned to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the electronic medical record revealed no evidence Resident #18 was given a copy of his current bed hold status and facility bed hold information as required. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, type two diabetes, and high blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure care plans were developed timely and care plan interventions were implemented. This affected four (Resident's #20, #33, #35 and #248) of 32 residents whose care plans were reviewed. The facility census was 54. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including gastroesophageal reflux disease, history of COVID-19, coronary angioplasty implant and graft, and hypotension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #20 had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #20 required extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Review of the plan of care dated 04/23/21 revealed Resident #20 was at risk for impaired skin integrity related to dementia, and incontinence of bowel and bladder. Interventions included: Assist resident with turning and repositioning as needed; Complete…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure shower/bed baths were given to residents. This affected four (Resident's #23, #38, #43, and #47) of five residents reviewed for showers. The facility census was 54. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute cystitis with hematuria, type II diabetes, heart failure, ileus, atrial fibrillation, and anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #38 was alert and oriented times to person, place, and time. He required extensive assistance of two staff for transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Review of the plan of care dated 07/21/21 revealed Resident #38 had an activities of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to impaired mobility. Interventions included: assist the resident with ADL (i.e., dressing, grooming, personal hygiene, locomotion, oral care, etc.) as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-20 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, review of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) memorandums, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Warning about drawing insulin from pens, and manufacturer's instruction on how to use insulin pens, the facility failed to ensure nurses knew how to administer insulin using an insulin pen correctly. In addition, the facility failed to ensure non-licensed nursing staff demonstrated competencies in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents needs prior to providing care and services to residents. This had the potential to affect all 54 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Record review of Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 01/11/22 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus and morbid obesity. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 had moderately impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of two staff for activities of daily living, except eating which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure Insulin Kwik pens were dated when opened. This affected two (Resident's #3 and #29) of two residents reviewed for Lantus Kwik pens. In addition, the facility failed to ensure expired stock over-the-counter Colace and baby aspirin used for multiple residents were removed from the medication carts. This had the potential to affect six (Resident's #4, #5, #26, #32, #34 and #35) of six residents who received baby aspirin and five (Resident's #14, #31, #43, #47 and #198) of five residents who received Colace. The facility census was 54. Finding include: 1. Observation on [DATE] at 9:32 A.M. of the medication cart on the 300-hall with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 810 revealed an over-the-counter bottle of Colace (stool softener) with an expiration date of 03/2022, and an over-the-counter bottle of baby aspirin with an expiration date of 02/2022. Review of the residents receiving baby aspirin on the 300-hall included Resident's #4, #5, #26, #32, #34…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure accurate advanced directive information was present throughout the medical record. This affected one (Resident #11) of one resident reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia, dementia, and muscle weakness. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 had severe cognitive impairment and required the extensive assistance of two staff for activities of daily living. Review of the physicians' orders for Resident #11 revealed an ordered dated [DATE] for Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care (DNRCC) code status signifying cardiopulmonary resuscitative (CPR) measures were not to be conducted in case of cardiac or respiratory arrest. Review of the care plan dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11's code status was DNRCC. Review of the signed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a wheelchair was in good working order for Resident #8. This affected one (Resident #8) of one resident reviewed for wheelchair condition. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 11/21/16 with diagnoses including unsteadiness on feet, difficulty walking, hypertension, type one diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, and vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 was cognitively impaired and utilized a wheelchair for mobility. Review of the physician's orders for April 2022 identified orders for Occupational Therapy (OT) to evaluate and treat per the plan of care, including wheelchair management. On 04/10/22 at 11:18 A.M., interview with Resident #8 revealed she needed a new wheelchair. Observation at the time of interview revealed Resident #8's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-20 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to accurately and timely complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessments. This affected two (Resident's #1 and #35) of 26 residents reviewed for resident assessments. The facility census was 54. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including fractured vertebra, post-traumatic stress disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of census records revealed Resident #1 discharged home from the facility on 12/24/21. Review of the MDS 3.0 assessment records for Resident #1 revealed an admission and Medicare Five-Day MDS 3.0 assessment were completed on 11/26/21. No other assessments including a discharge assessment were completed for Resident #1. The Administrator verified the lack of the required Discharge MDS 3.0 assessment during an interview on 04/12/22 at 10:15 A.M. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-20 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments were completed accurately. This affected three (Resident's (#250, #19 and #248) of 26 residents reviewed for accurate assessments and had the potential to affect all 54 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #250 revealed an admission date of 03/10/22 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting right dominant side, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anemia, hyperlipidemia, and encephalopathy. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #250 was cognitively intact and did not use tobacco. Review of the assessment titled Smoking Assessment - V 1, dated 03/10/22, indicated Resident #250 was not a smoker. Review of the assessment titled admission Assessment with Baseline Care Plan - v.4 - V 3, dated 03/10/22, also indicated Resident #250 was not a smoker. Review of the nurses note dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-20 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure level one screening for mental illness and a Pre-admission Screen and Resident Review (PASARR) for residents were completed as required. This affected three (Resident's #24, #37 and #40) of four residents reviewed for PASARR status. The facility census was 54. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), bipolar disorder, conversion disorder, and panic disorder. Resident #24 was discharged home on [DATE]. Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed a PASARR form was completed on 03/29/22. There was no documented evidence of a level one screening as required. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart attack, gout, arthritis, and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the admission records for Resident #37 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure insulin was administered according to the physician's orders. This affected one (Resident #19) of three residents reviewed during medication administration. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension, type II diabetes, gastro esophageal reflux disease, and schizophrenia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 had moderate cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Review of the insulin order dated 03/13/22 revealed Resident #19 was to receive Humalog Kwik Pen 100 unit/milliliter (ml) per sliding scale before meals and at bedtime. Observation of medication administration on 04/10/22 at 8:30 A. M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #809 revealed the nurse checked Resident #19's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure physician's orders for urinary catheter care and failed to ensure routine urinary catheter care was administered. This affected one (Resident #35) of two residents reviewed for urinary catheters. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including repeated falls, paranoid schizophrenia, dementia, malignant neoplasm of the prostate, and a localized mass and lump of the right lower limb. He was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and was admitted for a change in mental status. Resident #35 was readmitted to the facility from the hospital on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 had moderate cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance of one to two staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. The resident had a urinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #47 was provided fresh water daily. This affected one (Resident #47) of three residents reviewed for hydration. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including pain in the left hand, type II diabetes, heart failure, hypertension, hemiplegia, and malignant neoplasm of the stomach. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 had moderate cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance of one staff for most of her activities of daily living (ADL). Observation of Resident #47 on 04/11/22 at 8:40 A.M. revealed the resident sitting up in her wheelchair yelling for someone to please get her some ice and water. Observation of Resident #47's beside table as well as her over bed table revealed no cup in place. Interview with the resident at this time revealed she never…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure insulin orders for residents were written with the correct method of administration. This affected three residents (Resident's #19, #37 and #98) of three residents reviewed for insulin administration. The facility census was 54. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #19 had a physician's order dated 03/13/22 to administer Humalog Kwik Pen 100 units/milliliter (ml) solution per sliding scale intradermally (a shallow or superficial injection of a substance into the dermis, which is located between the epidermis and hypodermis) before meals and at bedtime. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 04/13/22 at 10:00 A.M. revealed all the orders the facility receives from the physician are sent to the pharmacy, and the pharmacy did not correct the order to read subcutaneously (administered into the subcutis, the layer of skin directly below the dermis and epidermis). 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #37 had a physician's order dated 02/23/22 to administer Humalog Kwik…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-20 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with eating equipment to maintain independence while eating. This affected two (Resident's #26 and #40) of two residents reviewed for adaptive eating equipment. The facility census was 54. Findings include: 1 Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 01/14/22 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, end stage renal disease, and proliferative diabetic retinopathy of the right eye. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 had intact cognition and required supervision with set-up only for eating. Review of the physician's orders for April 2022 revealed a diet order for renal, low concentrated sweets diet, regular texture, thin liquid consistency with double portions. Resident #26 also had an order for a plate guard with meals. Review of the care plan dated 01/19/22 revealed Resident #26 was at risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate medical record for two (Resident's #41 and #11) of 28 residents reviewed for the annual survey. The facility census was 54. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including traumatic brain injury, muscle weakness, and major depressive disorder. Review of the census records for Resident #41 revealed she was sent to and admitted to an acute care hospital on [DATE]. Resident #41 returned to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of the medical record revealed no documentation or evidence as to why Resident #41 was sent to the hospital. The nurse's notes noted an unrelated progress note related to an appointment on 02/23/22, and the next progress note noted in the medical record was from 03/04/22 stating Resident arrived at 12:40 P.M. via stretcher with ambulance, no complaints of pain, no lumps, bumps or bruises, lung sounds clear, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-06-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interview the facility failed to ensure foods were stored under sanitary conditions in unit refrigerators. This had the potential to affect 48 of 49 residents currently residing in the facility who received foods from the kitchen. The facility identified Resident #35 as not taking anything by mouth. Findings include: An observation was conducted on 06/05/19 at 10:08 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #903 of the 100/200 unit refrigerator used to store resident foods and snacks. There was no temperature log available to review. The internal thermometer read 38 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The general appearance of the unit indicated it had not been cleaned recently. The entire inside had multiple areas of spills and dried on food substances on all shelves and storage compartments. LPN #903 verified the temperature log was missing and the unit needed to be cleaned. An observation was conducted on 06/05/19 from 10:14 A.M. to 10:18 A.M. with LPN #904 of the 300/400 unit refrigerator used to store resident foods and snacks. LPN #904 indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview the facility failed to ensure a clean and safe environment for Resident #35 and Resident #9. This affected two of 49 residents sampled residents. The facility census was 49. Findings include: 1. Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including stroke, right side paralysis and depression. The Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated he had mild cognitive impairment, needed staff assistance for all activities of daily living and was dependent on tube feeding as his only source of nutrition and hydration. Observation on 06/03/19 at 2:01 P.M. revealed Resident #35 laying in his bed in his room. He had a tube feeding pump next to his bed with tube feeding solution infusing. All along the pole and the feet of the pole on which the tube feeding bag was hung, on the hand rail of the bed, the bed frame and an approximate two feet by two feet area of the floor around the pole was a heavy, dried, sticky, beige collection of what…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #46's meal intakes were consistently monitored per her care plan for nutrition and failed to ensure Resident #46's care plan for the use of an indwelling urinary catheter included ordered catheter care. This affected one resident (Resident #46) out of four residents reviewed for nutrition and one resident (Resident #46) of one resident reviewed for the use of a urinary catheter. Findings include: Resident #46 was admitted to this facility on 03/26/19. Her admitting diagnoses included dementia, cerebral infarction, and neurogenic bladder (lack of bladder control due to nerve damage). The resident had an indwelling urinary catheter (a tube inserted through the urethra into the bladder for the purpose of draining urine) in place due to a diagnosis of neurogenic bladder. Review of this resident's Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. 1. Review of the plan of care dated 04/16/19…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-06-28 · tag F0575 — widespreadPost a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure all required postings were on displaying in the facility in a manner that was accessible and understandable. This had the potential to affect all 65 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 65. Findings Include: Observation of the facility on 06/26/24 between 2:45 P.M. and 3:00 P.M. revealed no evidence of posted contact information for the State Survey Agency and other pertinent agencies and advocacy groups, including the State licensure office, adult protective services, the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman program, the protection and advocacy network, home and community based service programs, and the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit, were accessible to residents and resident representatives. The Administrator verified that such required information was not posted in an interview on 06/26/24 at 3:10 P.M.
- No harm found · Ccited before2024-06-28 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure daily nursing staffing information was up-to-date and posted in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. This had the potential to affect all 65 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 65. Findings Include: Observation of the posted nursing staff information on 06/24/24 at 8:45 A.M. revealed the posted nursing staff information was located on a bulletin board inside a staffing information area near the front desk that was not visible to residents and visitors. Further observation revealed the posted nursing staffing information was dated 06/14/24. Receptionist #955 verified the posted nursing staffing information was not current and not visible to residents or visitors in the facility during an interview on 06/24/24 at approximately 8:45 A.M.
- No harm found · C2022-04-20 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the most recent state survey results were readily available to staff and the public. This had the potential to affect all 54 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observation of the front desk area noted a wall file folder with the description Gateway Healthcare Center State Survey Results (the facility is currently under new ownership since 09/01/21 and has a new name). No results were noted in the wall file folder. The Ohio Department of Health conducted surveys at the facility on the following dates: • 03/12/22 Complaint Survey • 01/25/22 Complaint Survey • 08/30/21 Complaint Survey (violations issued) • 06/17/21 Complaint Survey • 04/26/21 Complaint Survey • 02/04/21 Complaint Survey • 01/11/21 Complaint Survey (violations issued) State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #997 verified the lack of survey results available for review during an interview on 04/10/22 at 8:15 A.M.
- No harm found · Ccited before2022-04-20 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure its posted nursing staff information was up to date as required. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Observation of the posted nursing staff information on 04/10/22 at 7:45 A.M. revealed the information was from 04/07/22 and 04/08/22. State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #997 verified the posted nursing staff information was not up to date during an interview on 04/10/22 at 7:49 A.M.
- No harm found · C2019-06-06 · tag F0623 — widespreadProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the state Ombudsman was notified when Residents #40, #204, and #46 were discharged to an acute care facility. This affected three of four residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 49. Findings include: 1. Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease and facial pain caused by trigeminal neuralgia. A progress note dated 04/06/19 at 5:15 P.M. revealed she had a flare up of trigeminal neuralgia and was discharged to the hospital emergency room. A progress note dated 04/11/19 at 5:42 P.M. revealed she was readmitted to the facility. 2. Resident #204 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's dementia and type two diabetes mellitus. A progress note dated 05/07/19 at 2:38 P.M. indicated she had a change in mental status and was discharged to the hospital. A progress note dated 05/16/19 at 1:27 P.M. indicated she was readmitted to the facility.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OHIO 5 OPCO HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 03/24/2025 |
| MB LEGACY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/24/2025 |
| NSAS OH5 HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/24/2025 |
| OH5 HRC LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/24/2025 |
| OH5FM LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/24/2025 |
| MENDLOWITZ, MOSHE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/24/2025 |
| SONNENSCHEIN, AARON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/24/2025 |
| STEINMETZ, NATHAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/24/2025 |
| GREGORIN, JASON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/24/2025 |
| MCCARTNEY, WILLIAM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/24/2025 |
| EUCLID SNF PROPCO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/24/2025 |
| OHIO 5 PROPCO HOLDCO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/24/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365730. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-06-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.