Village At St Edward Nrsg Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 103 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 48.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 56 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 81 beds and averages 76.9 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.03 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.68 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.12 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.74 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and resident record reviews, the facility failed to ensure call lights were in reach. This affected two residents (#8 and #67) of three residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 79.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included respiratory syncytial virus, fall, dementia, and anxiety.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #8 had a history of inattention, disorganized thinking, was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) that included, but not limited to, maximal assistance for upper body dressing and rolling left and right.Review of the care plan dated 01/14/26 revealed Resident #8 was at risk for falls and had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to dementia, impaired balance, impaired cognition and mobility with interventions that included assistance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident record review, resident interview, and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately assess and document a resident's hearing status on the minimum data set (MDS) assessment. This affected one resident (#1) of four residents reviewed for assessments. The facility census was 79.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pulmonary fibrosis, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, and type two diabetes.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had no cognitive impairment. Resident #1 required supervision or touching assistance with eating, and some assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Resident #1's ability to hear was adequate and she did not utilize hearing devices.Review of the care plan dated 01/12/26 revealed Resident #1 had an ADL self-care performance deficit with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident record review, resident interview, and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan to reflect a resident's hearing impairment. This affected one resident (#1) of one resident reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 79.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pulmonary fibrosis, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, and type two diabetes.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had no cognitive impairment. Resident #1 required supervision or touching assistance with eating, and some assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Resident #1's ability to hear was adequate and she did not utilize hearing devices.Review of the care plan dated 01/12/26 revealed Resident #1 had an ADL self-care performance deficit with interventions that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident record reviews, interviews, review of a Self-Reported Incident (SRI) and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) for dependent residents. This affected two residents (#1 and #86) of four residents reviewed for ADL care. The facility census was 79.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pulmonary fibrosis, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, and type two diabetes.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had no cognitive impairment. Resident #1 required supervision or touching assistance with eating, and some assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Resident #1's ability to hear was adequate and she did not utilize hearing devices.Review of the care plan dated 01/12/26 revealed Resident #1 had an ADL…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care planned interventions to prevent resident falls. This affected one (Resident #67) of two residents reviewed for accident hazards. The total census was 79.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #67 revealed she was admitted [DATE] and had diagnoses including unspecified dementia, diabetes, amnesia, edema, and degenerative disease of nervous system. Her last fall assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was at high risk for falls. Her care plan noted she was at risk for falls related to impaired cognition, poor safety awareness, and impaired mobility. One care planned intervention dated 07/19/22 revealed Resident #67 was to have Dycem (a rubber-like material designed to have high friction and prevent slipping) above and below the pressure cushion in her wheelchair.Observation on 02/25/26 at 2:03 P.M. revealed Resident #67 lying down on the floor in front of her wheelchair in the second-floor hallway by the dining…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to appropriately track and account for dispensed narcotics. This affected one (Resident #18) of three residents reviewed for narcotic tracking. The facility census was 79.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed she was admitted [DATE] and had diagnoses including major depressive disorder, pain in lower leg, and deep vein thrombosis. Her only past or current order of oxycodone tablets began 08/24/25 and was discontinued 08/27/25. Review of her October medication administration record revealed no active orders or documented administrations of oxycodone in that timeframe.Observation of the 200-hall medication cart on 03/02/26 at 9:40 A.M. revealed Resident #18 had one card of 54 oxycodone tablets which matched the medication count sheet. The most recent non-wasted removals of oxycodone tablets were dated 10/01/25, 10/12/25 and 10/31/25.Interview with the Administrator on 03/02/26 at 9:53 A.M. confirmed the above…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record, review of facility policy, and interview with staff, the facility failed to provide privacy during wound care to Resident #1. This affected one resident (Resident #1) of one observed for wound care. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included respiratory failure, diabetes, pulmonary hypertension, atrial fibrillation, coronary atherosclerosis, flaccid neuropathic bladder, insomnia, dementia, depression, and congestive heart failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had moderately impaired cognition. Review of Resident #1's physician orders revealed the resident had treatment orders for a right heel wound dated 03/13/25 to cleanse the wound with normal saline, apply Santyl ointment to the wound, and cover it with a foam dressing daily and as needed. Observation of wound care on 04/09/25 at 10:00 A.M. revealed Licensed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the medical record, interview with staff, and review of policy and procedure, the facility failed to maintain infection control during wound care for Resident #1's pressure ulcer. This affected one resident (Resident #1) of three reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included respiratory failure, diabetes, pulmonary hypertension, atrial fibrillation, coronary atherosclerosis, flaccid neuropathic bladder, insomnia, dementia, depression, and congestive heart failure. Review of the physician's order revealed Resident #1 had an order to cleanse the right heel with normal saline, apply Santyl ointment to the wound, cover with a foam dressing daily and as needed dated 03/13/25. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had moderately impaired cognition and had a one unstageable pressure ulcer not present on admission. Observation of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to timely notify resident representatives of significant changes in health status. This affected one (Resident #79) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 77 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #79 revealed an admission date of 08/29/24 with diagnoses of vascular dementia with other behavioral disturbances, diabetes, expressive language disorder, adjustment disorder, rheumatoid arthritis and fracture of the first lumbar vertebrae with a discharge date of 10/22/24. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #79 dated 09/05/24 revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.). Review of the nurse progress note for Resident #79 dated 09/08/24 timed at 10:45 P.M. revealed the resident had a fall without injury and the resident's representative was notified. Review of the nurse progress note for Resident #79 dated 09/09/24 timed 1:35 P.M.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, staff interview, resident representative interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent falls. This affected one (Resident #79) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 77 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #79 revealed an admission date of 08/29/24 with diagnoses of vascular dementia with other behavioral disturbances, diabetes, expressive language disorder, adjustment disorder, rheumatoid arthritis and fracture of the first lumbar vertebrae with a discharge date of 10/22/24. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #79 dated 09/05/24 revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired, required staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers and used a walker and a wheelchair for mobility. Review of the nurse progress note for Resident #79 dated 09/08/24 timed at 10:45 P.M. revealed the resident had unwitnessed fall from her wheelchair by the nurses' station Review of the physician's orders for Resident #79…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH