Good Shepherd Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 79 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 58.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 95 beds and averages 85.3 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.32 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.90 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2022-05-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to identify potential hazards and resident-specific interventions to reduce and/or eliminate falls and falls with injury. This resulted in actual harm when a resident experience repeated falls, with one resulting in a fracture requiring surgery. This affected one resident (#46) out of four residents reviewed for falls. The census was 89. Finding include: Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included muscle weakness, macular degeneration, dementia, anxiety, heart disease and major depressive disorder. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #46 was severely cognitively impaired. The resident required extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility, toilet use and transfers. The assessment revealed Resident #46 had no history of falls prior to admission. Review of the Care Area…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-18 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, review of the activities calendar, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to implement the activities calendar as scheduled and provide activities to meet resident needs. This affected 37 (#41, #28, #31, #17, #69, #64, #77, #3, #70, #49, #80, #51, #56, #39, #15, #82, #5, #32, #48, #36, #50, #62, #52, #38, #30, #24, #29, #22, #21, #9, #58, #20, #83, #76, #65, #79, and #2) of 37 residents who resided in the memory care unit. The facility census was 80.Findings include:Review of the activities calendar for the memory care unit revealed every day at 9:30 A.M. there was an activity called, Morning Greetings. Repetitive activities were noted on the same day each week. Further review of the activities calendar revealed there were no activities offered past 2:30 P.M. with the exception on 04/07/26 for music time at 3:15 P.M.Observation on 05/11/26 at 9:30 A.M. of the memory care unit revealed there was no activity completed. Observation on 05/11/26 at 10:15 A.M. revealed Activities Director (AD) #142 painting some of the female…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to store foods properly in the refrigerator and failed to discard expired food items. This had the potential to affect all 83 residents who the facility identified received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 83. Findings include: 1. Observation of the main kitchen refrigerator on 10/07/24 at 8:10 A.M. revealed there was a container of thickened pudding dated 09/23/24 and a container of thickened juice dated 09/23/24 which were outdated and failed to be discarded. Observation of the walk in refrigerator on 10/07/24 at 8:23 A.M. revealed a box of sliced mushrooms were on a wire shelf and were open to air. The cardboard lid failed to be secured to the box. Interview with Culinary Director #251 on 10/07/24 at 8:25 A.M. verified the thickened pudding and thickened juice were outdated and not discarded and the mushrooms were not stored properly. 2. Observation of the pureed food preparation on 10/08/24 at 10:45 A.M. revealed Chef #282 was preparing pureed beef stroganoff. After placing the stroganoff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to prepare pureed foods per the recipe and follow the dietician recommendations for serving sizes. This had the potential to affect six residents (#2, #37, #38, #46, #47, and #68) who received pureed meals and had to the potential to affect 77 residents who received regular or mechanical soft meals from the kitchen. The facility census was 83. Findings include: 1. Review of the Dining Manager's recipe for pureed vegetables revealed the recipe called for one quart of vegetables with one-fourth cup of melted margarine. Observation on 10/08/24 at 10:48 A.M. revealed Chef #282 was preparing the vegetable for the pureed diets. The chef placed the vegetables in the food processor then began pouring in a butter tasting substance used for grilling, sauteing, and pan frying. Chef #282 failed to measure the vegetables nor the butter substance. He poured at least one cup of butter substance in the food processor. Interview with Culinary Director #251 on 10/08/24 at 10:44 A.M. verified Chef #282 did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, staff interview, facility policy, and review of the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to ensure staff donned appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) in COVID-19 positive resident's rooms. This had the potential to affect all nine (#48, #49, #65, #67, #73, #76, #82, #88, and #189) residents in the 200 hall who were not COVID-19 positive. In addition, the facility failed to ensure four (#1, #11, #54, and #79) residents with a wound or indwelling medical device had enhanced barrier precautions in place. The facility identified an additional nine (#17, #30, #45, #48, #52, #53, #55, #68, and #189) residents who required enhanced barrier precautions. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene prior to administering medications to Resident #14. The facility census was 83. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #188 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included COVID-19 (10/03/24).…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident centered comprehensive care plans were in place. This affected two residents (#5 and #77) of 21 residents reviewed for resident centered comprehensive care plans. The facility census was 83. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 07/25/24. Diagnoses included dementia, anxiety, and lewy body dementia. Review of the admission physician orders dated 07/22/24 for Resident #5 revealed she was admitted with an order for Geodon (antipsychotic) 20 milligrams (mg). Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #5 revealed she was cognitively impaired and was prescribed routine antipsychotic medications. Review of the current physician orders for 10/2024 for Resident #5 revealed the Geodon was discontinued, and Seroquel (antipsychotic) 25 mg was prescribed. Review of the comprehensive care plan initiated 07/2024 for Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide showers timely to residents who were dependent on staff for showers/bathing. This affected one (Resident #8) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 83. Findings include: Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/17/23. Diagnosis included severe sepsis without shock, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and congestive heart failure. Review of Resident #8's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #8 required substantial assistance from staff for showers, baths, and personal hygiene. Review of Resident #8's care plan revealed she had an ADL self-care self-care performance deficit related to activity intolerance, impaired gait and balance, limited mobility, musculoskeletal impairment, and neuropathy, Interventions included the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure wound prevention boots were in place as physician ordered and failed to obtain a resident's weekly weight as physician ordered. This affected one (Resident (#11) of one resident reviewed for wounds and 21 residents reviewed for physician orders. The facility census was 83. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/01/22. Diagnoses included cerebral vascular accident, diabetes mellitus, pressure induced deep tissue damage of right heel, and non-pressure chronic ulcer of right ankle with fat layer exposed. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11's cognition was intact. Resident #11 had an open lesion on his foot and required dressings to the feet. Review of the care plan revealed Resident #11 had altered skin integrity related to a right ankle vascular wound, right anterior third toe traumatic wound, and a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-05-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure foods were stored properly, staff prepared food in a sanitary manner, and failed to ensure the dishmachine reached appropriate temperatures. This had the potential to affect 88 residents in the facility. The facility identified one resident (#32) did not receive oral nutrition. The facility census was 89. Findings include: 1. Observations on 05/09/22 beginning at 8:33 A.M. revealed an open bag of chicken, an open box of hashbrowns, and individual flatbread lying loose on the shelf in the walk-in freezer, and one large can of mandarin oranges and one large can of raspberry filling dented near the seal stored with the in-use canned food items. Interview on 05/09/22 at 8:46 A.M. with the Culinary Director #507 confirmed the chicken, hashbrowns and flatbread were stored inappropriately, and the dented cans should be removed from use. Observation and interview on 05/09/22 at 8:52 A.M. with the Culinary Director #507 revealed two opened, undated bags of hardboiled eggs with cloudy fluid…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-05-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms and wheelchairs were kept in a clean and sanitary manner. This affected eight residents (#2, #32, #39, #50, #52, #56, #60, and #87) out of eight residents reviewed for environmental concerns. The facility census was 89. Findings include: 1. Observation on 05/10/22 at 8:20 A.M. revealed Resident #39's room smelled of urine. Resident #39 was not in the room at the time. Interview on 05/10/22 at 8:20 A.M. with Medication Aide #513 confirmed Resident #39's room smelled of urine. Observation of Resident #50's room on 05/10/22 from 11:15 A.M. to 11:21 A.M. revealed an unmade bed, dirty linen on the sink and dirty clothing in a pile on the floor in the left hand corner of the room. There was dark, sticky debris on the floor in four of four corners of the room and on the metal threshold between the room and the hallway and the dark, sticky debris rubbed off when scuffed with the Surveyor's shoe. There was also a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, review of manufacturer's instructions, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff properly cleaned and disinfected the blood glucometer per manufacturer's recommendations. This had the potential to affect eight residents (#8, #23, #28, #31, #39, #41, #74 and #75) receiving blood sugar checks in the Meadows Unit. Facility census was 89. Findings include: Observation on 05/10/22 at 7:36 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #376 administering medications on the Meadows Unit and cleaned the blood glucometer with two alcohol wipes. Interview with LPN #376 at the time of the observation on 05/10/22 at 7:36 A.M. verified blood glucometer's are cleaned with alcohol. Interview with LPN #376 on 05/10/22 at 2:30 P.M. verified LPN #376 used alcohol to clean the blood glucometer before and after the morning blood sugar check for Resident #74, with LPN #376 further stating she should have used a disinfectant wipe. Review of facility policy titled, Glucometer Disinfection, with a review date of 02/21 verified blood glucometer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH