Vineyards At Concord, The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 13% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 32 beds and averages 23.9 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.88 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.89 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.57 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.62 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.98 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.97 to 0.70 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-04-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, hospital record review, interviews and review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 user's manual, the facility failed to ensure adequate fall risk/safety interventions were in place and functioning to prevent falls. Additionally, the facility failed to document and comprehensively investigate falls. Actual harm occurred on 02/11/26 when the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized fall program to prevent falls with injury for Resident #4, who exhibited severe cognitive impairment, had history of falls, and required substantial/maximal assistance with transfers, sustained a fall resulting in a displaced spiral fracture of the right femur requiring surgical repair. This affected two (Residents #4 and #18) of two residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 27. Findings Include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an initial admission date of 01/02/26 with the latest readmission date of 02/17/26…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fdisputed · IDR2026-04-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and utilization of the staffing tool the facility failed to maintain sufficient staffing to provide for resident care needs. This affected all residents in the facility. The facility census was 27 at the time of survey. Findings include: Observation of meals during survey from 04/13/26 through 04/15/26 revealed meals were being passed late.Observation on 04/13/26 at 3:20 P.M., of Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #117 and CNA #127 provide incontinence care for Resident #19 revealed they wheeled her to her room from the dining room where she had been sitting since 8:00 A.M. upon entry to the facility. The resident's pants were pulled down and revealed the resident had a blue brief on and a large liner that was completely saturated with a strong ammonia smelling urine. Interview on 04/13/26 at 3:20 P.M. with CNA #117 revealed the resident was supposed to be toileted every hour and a half. CNA #127 stated, the resident had not been toileted for quite some time. Interview with Director of Nursing on 04/14/26 at 12:05 P.M. reveals that We need help so…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fdisputed · IDR2026-04-28 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record reviews, interviews and review of job descriptions, the facility failed to be administrated in a manner that uses it's resources effectively and efficiently to ensure resident safety, failed to maintain an activities program directed by a qualified activities professional, failed to maintain sufficient staffing to provide for resident care needs and failed to ensure the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA), the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Registered Dietician (RD) were permitted to work enough hours to effectively complete their job. This deficient practice demonstrated significant breakdowns in administrative oversight and had the potential to affect all 27 residents residing in the facility. Findings include:1. Interview with Director of Nursing (DON) on 04/14/26 at 12:05 P.M. reveals that We need help so bad. We don't have enough staff to take care of our patients. We are understaffed and we need more help, resident care is missed because of it. Utilization of the Survey Staffing Tool completed for 04/07/2026 through 04/13/2026 revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to establish, maintain and implement written policies and procedures regarding the resident's right to formulate an advance directive. Additionally, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive plan of care for do not resuscitate (DNR) code status. This affected four residents (#3, #4, #15 and #18) of four residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 27. Findings Include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an initial admission date of 05/06/24 with the diagnoses including but not limited to schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, dysphagia, osteoarthritis, Parkinson's disease, irritable bowel syndrome, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cirrhosis of liver, fatty liver, hyperlipidemia, anemia, diverticulosis of intestine, overactive bladder, esophageal varices and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Review of the resident's DNR form dated 09/16/25 revealed the resident had elected the code status of do not resuscitate comfort care (DNRCC)-arrest which indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Edisputed · IDR2026-04-28 · tag F0680 — pattern
  Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and observation, the facility failed to maintain an activities program directed by a qualified activities professional. This had the potential to affect all residents with the exception of one (Resident #2). The facility census was 27.Observation throughout the annual survey from 04/13/26 through 04/20/2026 revealed activities of music playing throughout the days in the common area and one activity on 04/15/26 of snack making with residents. No other activities were observed and no activity director was observed in the facility.Interview on 04/13/26 at 2:40 P.M. with Resident #2 stated that she didn't have an issue with the activities because she mostly stays in her room and watches TV and does not wish to attend any activities. Interview on 04/14/26 at 3:15 P.M. with Administrator and Facility Manager #100 confirmed that the facility does not have a current activities director and does not employ anyone with the required qualifications for an activities director. Administrator states we do not have an activities director currently, we haven't had one for a while.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored securely for Resident #18. Additionally, the facility failed to dispose of expired medications on the medication cart. This affected five residents (#2, #4, #7, #15 and #18). The facility census was 27. Findings Include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an initial admission date of 02/19/26 with the diagnoses including but not limited to atrial fibrillation, allergic rhinitis, hyperlipidemia, osteoarthritis, constipation, atherosclerotic heart disease, anxiety disorder, hypertension, chronic pain syndrome, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), gastro-esophageal reflux disease and obstructive sleep apnea. Review of the resident's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had no cognitive deficit. Review of the resident's monthly physician orders for April 2026 identified orders dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-28 · tag F0800 — pattern
  Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interviews the facility failed to follow diet orders when dietary staff served mechanical textured meat to residents on a regular diet during lunch meal. This had the potential to affect 18 ( #1, #2, #4, #6, #7, # 8, #11, #13, #14, #18, #21, #22, #23, #24, #25, #26, #27, and #29) who receive a regular diet. The facility census was 27. Observation on 04/15/26 at 12:15 P.M. with [NAME] #118 revealed the lunch meal was pork and sauerkraut, mashed potatoes and bread pudding. The pork and sauerkraut were made into mechanical texture and served to residents who are on a regular diet. Associate #118 confirmed pork was mechanical texture and she does this so residents receive the same looking meat and to reduce choking hazard. Pureed pork and sauerkraut was made with milk. Associate #118 confirmed she used milk to puree pork and sauerkraut because it adds calories and nutrients. Review of the medical records revealed 18 ( #1, #2, #4, #6, #7, # 8, #11, #13, #14, #18, #21, #22, #23, #24, #25, #26, #27, and #29) residents received a regular diet. Interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-28 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
  Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to prepare and deliver meals timely according to dining schedule. This had the potential to affect affect 26 residents receiving food in the facility. The facility identified one resident (#5) who received nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 27. Interview on 04/13/26 at 8:30 A.M. with [NAME] #118 regarding meal times-breakfast is served at 7:45/8:00 A.M., lunch is served at 11:45/12:00 P.M. and dinner at 4:30/5:30 P.M. Dining staff consist of cook and occasionally a hospitality aide. Observation on 04/13/26 at 12:21 P.M. lunch has not started to be served to 11 residents sitting in dining room. Hospitality aide present to assist. Observation on 4/14/26 at 9:00 A.M. breakfast starting to be served to residents in dining room. Observation on 4/15/26 at 8:50 A.M. breakfast was not being served yet. Interview on 04/15/26 at 8:55 A.M. with [NAME] #118 confirmed waiting on hall trays to be served to residents before serving dining room. Dining room had eight residents (Resident #4, Resident #7, Resident #11,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-28 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to follow the menu, complete substitution log as needed and prepare meal with appropriate diet order. This had the potential to affect 26 residents receiving food in the facility. The facility identified one resident (#5) who received nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census is 27. Review of the menu revealed lunch for 04/15/26 consisted of pork and sauerkraut, mashed potatoes, and pumpkin bread pudding. Observation on 04/15/26 at 12:15 P.M. with [NAME] #118 revealed lunch meal was being prepared that included pork and sauerkraut, mashed potatoes ( instead of scalloped potatoes per menu) and apple bread pudding ( instead of pumpkin bread pudding per menu). The pork and sauerkraut were made into mechanical texture and was prepared for residents who are on a regular diet. Interview on 04/15/26 at 12:30 P.M. with [NAME] #118 confirmed the pork was mechanical texture and she does this so residents receive the same looking meat and to reduce choking hazard. [NAME] #118 also verified she did not follow a menu…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interviews the facility failed to store food appropriately and ensure a sanitary environment. This had the potential to affect 26 residents who receive food from the kitchen. The facility had one resident (#5) who received nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 27.Observation on 04/13/26 at 8:30 A.M. with [NAME] #118 during walk through revealed in the dry storage areas of concern included scoop in sugar container, 50-lb oats bag not sealed or dated and was located on the floor, no dates on beans, sugar and rice containers. Freezer areas of concern included no dates on bags of green beans, cauliflower, broccoli, carrots, tater tots or hashbrowns. Refrigerator areas of concern included pepperoni dated 01/26/26, deli cheese with no date, veggie and fruit tray with no date, and mustard with no label or date. Resident food brought in by family or visitors included cubed cheese no date, grapes no date or label, cuties no date, red seedless grapes no date, and a styrofoam box of food with no date. Drink containers of juice, house shake, tea and lemonade…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-28 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, policy review and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure dignity and respect were shown to resident who needed assistance to eat. This affected one (#16) of one resident reviewed for assistance with eating. The facility census was 27.Medical record review for Resident #16 was admitted on [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included Huntington's disease, anxiety and depression.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #16's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was 09 out of 15 indicating resident has moderate cognitive impairment. His functional status for eating was maximum assistance. Observation of the dining room on 04/13/26 at 12:00 P.M. revealed Resident #16 was among 11 unidentified residents sitting at the dining table waiting for lunch. Observation of the dining room on 04/13/26 at 12:26 P.M. lunch meal was served to these unidentified 11 residents and not to Resident #16, and they started eating.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $300K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH