No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Momentous Health At Franklin

421 Mission Lane, Franklin, OH 45005 · For profit - Individual · 79 certified beds · (937) 746-3943 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (937) 746-3943 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Sep 20251 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Franklin0.9 mi
333 Conover Drive, Suite H
Pharmacy
Cvs0.6 mi
150 S Main St · (937) 746-4849 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
110 E 6th St · (937) 746-1114 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(937) 746-5001 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
420 Mission Ln · (937) 469-1425

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.0%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.9%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms57.9%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.4%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.7%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.2%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.4%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.1%3.4%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.0%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.9%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine80.9%75.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission45.0%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.6%12.9%12.0%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

12.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
35.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.10U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.05hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 35.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 6% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.1%CMS range 7.3–17.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge35.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge40.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge35.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.061.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.52
RN hours/ resident / day
0.62
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.09
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.23
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.46
RN hoursweekends
51.8%
Total nursing turnover
77.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 79 beds and averages 70.6 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.23 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.36 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-15)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2023-02-14)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-02-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to respond to an acute change in condition, including an elevated temperature for Resident #49 in a timely manner. Actual harm occurred on 01/27/23 when Resident #49, who was in a persistent vegetative state and dependent on staff for all activity of daily living care, was transferred to hospital and admitted for treatment of pneumonia requiring intravenous (IV) antibiotics. The resident had been initially assessed to have an elevated temperature on 01/25/23 of 101.3 with no evidence of physician notification, comprehensive assessment or treatment. The resident was hospitalized until 02/02/23. The facility's census was 51. Findings include: Review of Resident #49's medical record revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, diffuse traumatic brain injury, anoxic brain damage, fracture of the thoracic vertebra, traumatic subdural hemorrhage, quadriplegia, tracheostomy,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, resident and staff interviews, review of dietary spreadsheets, review of guidelines for pureeing food, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received enough food to meet their needs and preferences, serve portions sizes as planned on the menu, ensure pureed food was prepared in a manner to maintain the nutritive value of the food, and ensure posted menus were updated for the residents to view what meals they were having for the day. This affected Resident #3 and had the potential to affect 65 of 66 residents. The facility identified one resident (#9) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 66. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 05/21/25. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus, end-stage renal disease (ESRD) with dependence on renal dialysis, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Review of the nutrition care plan dated 05/23/25 revealed Resident #3 was on a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-09-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and resident representative interviews, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received foods that were palatable. This had the potential to affect 65 of 66 residents. The facility identified one resident (#9) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of a test tray on 09/09/25 at 12:52 P.M. with Dietary Supervisor (DS) #168, revealed the taco, refried beans, and rice and beans were luke warm and not palatable. DS #168 verified the taco, refried beans, and rice and beans were not served at a suitable temperature and were not palatable. Interview on 09/09/25 at 1:07 P.M., Resident #39 stated the food he was served for lunch was cold. Interview on 09/09/25 at 1:11 P.M., Resident #20 stated the food she was served for lunch was cold, like it always is. The resident described the food as hog slop. Interview on 09/08/25 at 9:10 A.M., Resident #77 complained of the food being cold. Interview on 09/08/25 at 10:03 A.M., Resident #24's responsible party stated Resident #24 often…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in a manner to protect against the potential spread of foodborne illness. The facility also failed to ensure staff wore hair restraints in the kitchen. The facility also failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect 65 of 66 residents in the facility. The facility identified one resident (#09) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Observation and interview on 09/08/25 at 7:50 A.M. of the kitchen's reach-in refrigerators with Dietary Supervisor (DS) #168 revealed a reusable plastic bag of cheese slices that was unsealed, and a package of bologna slices not dated or sealed. There was also a box containing two bags of sausage and one of the bags was not sealed and did not have a date. DS #168 verified the cheese was not sealed and the bologna and sausage were not sealed or dated. DS #168 verified all food should be sealed and dated. Observation and interview on 09/08/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-09-15 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's quality assurance performance improvement (QAPI) meeting sign-in sheets, review of the facility's QAPI meetings policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure required QAPI team member were present at meetings. The had the ability to affect all 66 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facilities' QAPI/Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meeting sign in sheets revealed the following: The Director of Nursing (DON) and Medical Director (MD) were not present at a meeting 10/23/24. No designees for the DON or MD were listed.The DON and MD were not present at a meeting dated 02/10/25. No designees for the DON or MD were listed. No staff identified as the infection preventionist (IP) or designee was present. No designee for the IP listed.The DON was not present at a meeting dated 04/22/25. No designee for the DON was listed.The IP was not present at a meeting dated 08/26/25. No designee for the IP listed. Review of the facility's QAPI meetings policy dated 08/01/23 revealed the facility Quality Assurance and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-09-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean, sanitary, and safe environment for all residents. This affected Residents #4 and #31 and had the potential to affect all 66 residents residing in the facility.Findings include: 1. Observations on 09/08/25 between 9:00 A.M. and 10:00 A.M. revealed the floors of the 200 and 300 halls contained numerous areas of dark grey and black shoe (foot) prints, dark grey and black wheelchair trail marks, and dark grey and black marks suggestive of dried liquid drips. There was dirt, grime, and dust throughout both halls. Interview on 09/08/25 at 10:02 A.M., Resident #31 described the facility cleanliness as “nasty” and stated all of the housekeepers but one were recently fired. Interview on 09/08/25 at 11:21 A.M., Resident #4 complained the floors in the common area were not very clean and further stated he thought the floors were dirty because there was only one person in housekeeping for the entire building. Interview on 09/08/25 at 10:12 A.M., Housekeeper #109 verified the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, staff interview, policy review, and review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to follow physician orders for contact isolation precautions for Residents #57 and #13. This affected Residents #57 and #13 and had the potential to affect the residents residing on their units, 100 and 200 halls. The facility census was 66. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission dated of 12/14/11. Diagnoses included cerebrovascular disease, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting right dominant side. Review of the physician orders dated 09/09/25 revealed an order for contact isolation precautions every shift for shingles until resolved. Observation on 09/09/25 at 11:16 A.M. revealed Resident #13 sitting in the dining room, leaning on a dining room table, with ten other residents and one Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) present. Interview on 09/09/25 11:20 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, observations, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure all residents were provided with a safe, clean and homelike environment. This affected two (#13 and #25) of two residents reviewed for homelike environment. The facility census was 66.Findings included: 1. Observation on 09/08/25 at 8:47 A.M. revealed Resident #25's bathroom smelled of urine. There was a yellow substance surrounding the base of the toilet, and an area measuring approximately eight inches (in) by 8 in of a similarly appearing yellow substance. There were several brown marks throughout the floor of the bathroom. Interview on 09/08/25 at 8:47 A.M., Resident #25 stated his bathroom floor was dirty, and the bathroom smelled like urine. Resident #25 stated his bathroom did not get cleaned very often. Interview on 09/08/25 at 9:00 A.M., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #129 verified Resident #25's bathroom had yellow stains around the base of the toilet, brown marks throughout the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, review of Self-Reported Incidents (SRI), and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations of staff-to-resident physical abuse were reported timely to administration and the State Survey Agency. This affected one (#40) of five residents reviewed abuse. The facility census was 66.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 06/09/25. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction with left-sided hemiplegia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, anxiety, and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #40 had moderately impaired cognition. Review of the progress notes dated 07/01/25 at 6:05 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #160 entered Resident #40's room and heard Resident #40 yelling profanities and get off of me directed at an unknown certified nurse aide (CNA). The progress note revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure admission comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed within the required timeframes. This affected three (#3, #25, and #39) of three residents reviewed for resident assessment. The facility census was 66.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 07/14/25. Diagnoses included major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, suicidal ideations, hypertension, and morbid obesity. Review of the admission comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a severe cognitive impairment. The assessment was not locked as completed until 08/18/25. Interview on 09/09/25 at 4:26 P.M., MDS Nurse #172 verified Resident #39's admission comprehensive MDS assessment was not locked as completed until 08/18/25. MDS Nurse #172 verified Resident #39's admission comprehensive MDS assessment should have been completed within 14 days of admission by 07/27/25. 2. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were complete and specific to each resident. This affected two (#3 and #55) of six residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 66. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 05/21/25. Diagnoses included cellulitis, depression, type II diabetes mellitus, history of nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, end-stage renal disease with dependence on renal dialysis, anxiety, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and heart failure. The resident transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the plan of care dated 05/29/25 revealed there was no care plan to address Resident #3's ability to carry out his activities of daily living (ADLs). There was no dental care plan to address Resident #3's edentulism. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 25 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were updated timely to reflect new diagnoses, new sexual behaviors, and medications to treat the new diagnoses and behaviors. This affected two (#45 and #57) of six residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 66. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #57 revealed an admissions date of 04/18/22 with diagnoses including cerebral infraction, dementia, and major depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #57 was cognitively impaired. Review of the medical laboratory records dated 08/19/25 revealed Resident #57 was positive for Herpes Simplex 1. Review of the physician's orders dated 08/24/25 revealed Resident #57 had a new order of Valtrex (treats Herpes) 500 milligrams (mg). Review of Resident #57's care plan on 09/10/25 revealed that the new diagnoses and medication was not included in the care plan. Interview on 09/10/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance with activities of daily living received adequate assistance with nail care. This affected one (#22) of two residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 01/25/24. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, major depressive disorder, dementia, muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 had intact cognition. The resident was independent with personal hygiene, required setup/cleanup assistance with dressing, and required supervision or touching assistance with bathing. Review of the plan of care dated 08/06/24 revealed Resident #22 was independent/supervision for ADLs except for bathing.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure activities met the needs and preferences of the residents. This affected one (Resident #77) of two residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 66.Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #77 revealed an admission date of 09/02/25 with diagnoses of paraplegia, schizophrenia, anxiety disorder, and bipolar disorder. There was no Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment available to review due to recent admission. Interview on 09/08/25 at 12:04 P.M. with Resident #77 revealed there were no activities. Observation on 09/11/25 at 8:26 A.M. revealed the schedule of activities for September 2025 had no activities scheduled for the residents after the 2:00 P.M. everyday of the month, except for every other Tuesday when church services were scheduled at 6:00 P.M. Interview on 09/11/25 at 8:38 A.M. with Activities Director #104 confirmed there were no activities scheduled for the residents after the 2:00 P.M. scheduled activity is completed, except…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident and staff interviews, review of U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents vaped in the facility's designated smoking area. This affected one (Resident #11) of two residents reviewed for supervision. The facility census was 66.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 07/29/24 with diagnoses including centrilobular emphysema and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 had moderate cognitive impairment, rejected care at times and was independent with ambulation. Review of the Smoking assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 required supervision while smoking. There was no documentation that Resident #11 was non-compliant with the facility's smoking policy. Observation and interview on 09/08/25 at 10:15 A.M. revealed Resident #11 with a cloud of smoke above her knees and a vape machine in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed five percent (%). There were two observed errors out of 34 opportunities that resulted in a medication error rate of 5.88%. This affected one (Resident #42) out of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 12/20/21. Review of the physician orders revealed an order dated 01/09/24 for Calcium plus Vitamin D3 Oral Tablet 500-5 milligrams (mg)- microgram (mcg) give one tablet by mouth one time a day for supplement. There was an order dated 07/17/25 for Duloxetine HCl oral capsule delayed release sprinkle 30 mg give one capsule by mouth one time a day for schizophrenia. Observations on 09/10/25 from 8:00 A.M. through 8:30 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #151 revealed LPN #155 administered 33 medications to three residents. Resident #42 was administered the following medications in error, Calcium + Vitamin D3 Oral Tablet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurate. This affected one (#3) of 23 residents reviewed medical record accuracy. The facility census was 66.Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 05/21/25. Diagnoses included end-stage renal disease (ESRD) with dependence on renal dialysis, and heart failure. Review of Resident #3's physician orders revealed orders dated 05/22/25 and 05/24/25 for Resident #3 to attend dialysis on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday with pickup at 5:30 A.M. On 05/27/25, there was an order to send Resident #3 to the emergency room for evaluation. Review of a progress note dated 05/27/25 at 7:23 A.M. revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #128 was notified Resident #3 was not picked up for transport for dialysis that morning (05/27/25) and may have missed dialysis on Saturday (05/24/25) due to transport. NP #301 was notified and an order was received to send the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, review of the facility menu and spreadsheet and policy review, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed. This had the potential to affect 59 of 59 residents who receive their meals from the kitchen, the facility identified two residents (#25 and #31) that received no food by mouth. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the menu dated 07/03/24 revealed oatmeal or cold cereal, cheesy scrambled eggs, a sausage patty, assorted toast, whole milk or two percent milk and coffee or tea were to be served for breakfast. Review of the undated menu spreadsheet revealed regular diets were to receive six ounces of oatmeal, two ounces of cheesy scrambled eggs, and one slice of toast for breakfast, mechanical soft diets were to receive six ounces of oatmeal, two ounces of cheesy scrambled eggs, and one slice of toast for breakfast and pureed diets were to receive six ounces of pureed oatmeal, two ounces of pureed cheesy scrambled eggs, and two ounces of pureed toast for breakfast. Observation of the kitchen on 07/03/24 at 7:38 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, record review, the facility failed to ensure food items were stored in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect 59 of 59 residents who receive their meals from the kitchen, the facility identified two residents (#25 and #31) that received no food by mouth. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen on 07/03/24 at 7:45 A.M. revealed the reach in refrigerator in the kitchen was 60 degrees Fahrenheit. A package of ham, a package of hamburgers and a package of hotdog's were located in the refrigerator. There was also a gray fuzzy substance on the line that went from the ceiling to the steam table and there was a gray fuzzy on the ceiling vent located directly above the onions in the dry storage room. There were also three flies sitting on the line that went from the ceiling to the steam table in the kitchen. Interview with Dietary Supervisor (DS) #110 on 07/03/24 at 7:45 A.M. verified the reach in refrigerator was 60 degrees Fahrenheit and there was a package of ham, a package of hamburgers and a package of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff and resident interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored securely. This affected five (#18, #29, #32, #55 and #56) out of five residents reviewed for medication storage. This had the potential to affect four (#29, #48, #10 and #57) residents that the facility identified as cognitively impaired and independently mobile. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #18 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to schizophrenia, left female breast cancer, anxiety disorder, impaired cognition and bipolar disorder. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #18 revealed an intact cognition. Resident #18 was independent for eating and supervised toileting, bed mobility, and transfers. Resident #18 was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Resident #18 was receiving hospice services. Review of the plan of care for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's admission assessments were timely completed in the electronic health record. This affected one (#300) out of three residents reviewed for medical record accuracy and completeness. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #300's chart revealed resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, emphysema, congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease and hypertension. Resident #300 discharged from the facility on 05/23/24 at approximately 9:49 A.M. Review of Resident #300's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #300 was independent with eating. Resident #300 required maximal assistance with toileting, showering, lower body dressing, sitting to lying, lying to sitting, sitting to standing, chair transfers,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff completed hand hygiene during during incontinence care. This affected one (#06) out of three residents reviewed for incontinent care. The facility census was 61. Findings include Medical record review for Resident #06's revealed resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety, hyperlipidemia, retention of urine, hypertension, anxiety disorder, peripheral vascular disease, muscle weakness and dysphagia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #06 revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #06 required supervision with eating and rolling left and right. Resident #06 required moderate assistance with toileting, personal hygiene, and maximal assistance with toileting. Resident #06 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility's Self-Reported Incident (SRI), review of the facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to report resident-to-resident physical abuse to the State Survey Agency, the Ohio Department of Health. This affected two (Residents #1 and #2) of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 55. Findings include: Record review for Resident #1 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, dementia, depression, anxiety, and psychotic disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had impaired cognition. Review of Resident #1's progress notes dated 01/27/24 at 7:42 P.M. revealed Resident #1 walked past Resident #3's room and while standing in the hallway, Resident #3 struck Resident #1 in the mouth causing an abrasion to her lip. Resident #1 was assessed by the nurse and the resident's family representative was notified. Record review for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to notify the physician and resident representative of the resident's severe weight losses. This affected two (Residents #200 and #500) of six residents reviewed for weight loss. The facility census was 54. Finding: 1. Closed record review for Resident #200 revealed an admission date of 12/09/22. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus type two, tracheostomy, stage four decubitus ulcer (Full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle), systemic cerebral vascular accident, dysphagia, quadriplegia, and gastrostomy tube. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #200 was cognitively impaired and no behaviors or rejection of care. Resident #200 received 51% or more total calories though tube feeding, had a five percent weight loss, and was not on a physician prescribed weight-loss regimen. Resident #200 was at a high risk for pressure ulcers with one stage four…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-12 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the Medline guidance, the facility failed to provide the care and services for a resident's peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). This affected one (Resident #200) of three residents reviewed for intravenous (IV) therapy. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Closed record review of Resident #200 revealed an admission date of 12/09/22. Diagnoses included moyamoya, tracheostomy, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, cerebral vascular accident, neurogenic bladder, and quadriplegia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #200 had impaired cognition, had no behaviors, or no rejection of care. Review of the physician orders dated 11/14/23 revealed Resident #200 received a new order for an intravenous antibiotic Meropenem one gram three times a day for urinary tract infection. The antibiotic was to be administered through a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) which was placed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of medications by ensuring expired medications were not being used. This affected six residents (#2, #4, #7, #15, #34, #155) who facility identified as receiving the expired medications from two medication carts and a medication storage room in the facility. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Observations and interviews on 01/07/23 from 10:20 A.M. to 11:00 A.M. of two facility medication carts (200 and 300 halls) and one medication storage room (200/300 halls) with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #140 and Registered Nurse (RN) #192 revealed the following over the counter (OTC) expired medications: Certavite multivitamins expired 01/2023, Gerilanta expired 12/2022, and Claritin 10 milligrams (mg) expired 09/2022. LPN #140 and RN #192 confirmed the outdated medications were in the medication carts and the medication storage room. Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Storage, undated, revealed the facility failed to implement the policy.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to notify the physician of Resident #49's elevated temperature for two days. This affected one (Resident #49) of three residents reviewed for physician notification. The facility's census was 51. Findings include: Review of Resident #49's medical record revealed he was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, diffuse traumatic brain injury, anoxic brain damage, fracture of the thoracic vertebra, traumatic subdural hemorrhage, quadriplegia, tracheostomy, gastrostomy, and persistent vegetive state. Review of Resident #49's the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed he had impaired cognition related to his persistent vegetive state. Further review revealed Resident #49 was totally dependent on staff with all areas of activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of Resident #49's vital signs history revealed on 01/25/23 at 5:38 P.M., Resident #49's body temperature was 101.3. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-14 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide activities to residents residing in the facility's Memory Care Unit (MCU). This affected three (Residents #25, #35, and #41) of three residents reviewed for activities. The facility's census was 51. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #25's medical records, revealed resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dementia without behavioral disturbances, cerebrovascular disease, psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition, diabetes, hypertension, and diverticulosis of intestine. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #25 had extensive cognitive impairment. His functional status is listed as extensive one to two person assist to totally dependent on staff for activities of daily living. Review of the care plan dated 07/30/21 revealed Resident #25's daily activity could be affected by admission,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the faciltiy failed to assess pressure ulcers on a weekly basis to include wound measurments and description of the wounds. This affected two (Residents #30 and #37) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility identified four (Residents #29, #30, #37, and #39) with pressure ulcers. The facility's census was 51. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 12/09/22. Diagnoses included neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, gastroesophageal reflux disease, type II diabetes mellitus, seizures, major depressive disorder, and pressure ulcer of the sacral region (stage IV). Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #30 had impaired cognition. The resident required total assistance for all activities of daily living (ADLs), except bed mobility in which the resident required extensive assistance. The assessment indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-14 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an ordered orthotic therapeutic device was applied to assist with a resident's contracture. This affected one (Resident #49) observed for application of therapeutic devices. The facility identified 25 residents with contractures. The facility's census was 51. Findings include: Review of Resident #49's medical record revealed the resident was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included traumatic brain injury, anoxic brain damage, fracture of the thoracic vertebra, traumatic subdural hemorrhage, quadriplegia, tracheostomy, gastrostomy, and persistent vegetive state. Review of Resident #49's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition related to his persistent vegetive state. Resident #49 was totally dependent on staff with all areas of activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of Resident #49's physician orders revealed an order dated 11/09/22 for staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide supervision and failed to implement interventions for a resident who smoked. This affected one (Resident #45) of five residents identified to smoke. The facility's census was 51. Findings include Medical record review for Resident #45 revealed an admission date of 06/11/21. Diagnoses included encephalopathy, seizures, polyarthritis, alcohol abuse, anxiety disorder, essential primary hypertension, pseudobulbar affect, major depressive disorder, alcohol abuse with alcohol induced psychotic disorder, and dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #45 had severely impaired cognition. Resident #45 required extensive assistance from staff with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, locomotion on the unit, and toilet use. Resident #45 required limited assistance from staff with personal hygiene and eating. Review of Resident #45's most recent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to maintain appropriate infection control techniques during tracheostomy (trach) care. This affected one resident (#49) of the two residents identified by the facility as requiring tracheostomy care. The facility also failed to utilize proper hand hygiene during wound care. This affected one Resident (#49) of the four residents identified with wounds and requiring dressing changes. The facility census was 51. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #49's medical record revealed resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included, but not limited to, diffuse traumatic brain injury (TBI), anoxic brain damage, fracture of the thoracic vertebra, traumatic subdural hemorrhage, quadriplegia, trach dependent, and gastrostomy. Review of Resident #49's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE], revealed resident had impaired cognition. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and/or implement each resident's plan of care related to contracture management, diabetes management and insulin use, use of an anti-platelet medication, and for medications used to managed inappropriate behaviors. This affected four (#04, #07, #52, and #63) of 20 residents' whose care plans were reviewed. The census was 66 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #04 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, hypertension, and dysphagia. The facility completed a quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment of Resident #04's cognitive and physical functional status dated 09/02/19. The resident was identified as having moderate cognitive deficits, and being dependent on one to two staff person for all of her activities of daily living. The resident was assessed as having functional limitations in her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and representative/family interview and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that one resident received treatment and care to maintain proper and comfortable positioning while in a wheel chair. This affected one (Resident #16) of three residents reviewed for positioning/mobility. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, moderate protein calorie malnutrition (PCM), dementia with behavioral disturbance, anxiety disorder, repeated falls, dysphagia, and bilateral hearing loss. The resident was admitted to in-facility hospice services on 11/15/19 with an admitting diagnoses of PCM. The facility completed an admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment of the resident's cognitive and physical functional status on 09/18/19. The 09/18/19 assessment identified the resident as having short and long term memory problems with severely impaired cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident with a limited range of motion received appropriate treatment to prevent further decreases in range of motion and to improve comfort. This involved one (Resident #04) of three residents reviewed for positioning/mobility. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #04 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, hypertension, and dysphagia. The facility completed a quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment of Resident #04's cognitive and physical functional status dated 09/02/19. The resident was identified as having moderate cognitive deficits, and being dependent on one to two staff person for all of her activities of daily living. The resident was assessed as having functional limitations in her range of motion to both of her upper and lower extremities. Review of Resident #04's current…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a resident was monitored for sexual behaviors related to the use of medication. This affected one (Resident #07) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of Resident #07's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/17/15 with diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #07's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident required supervision for bed mobility and transfer. The resident required extensive one-person assistance for dressing, personal hygiene and toileting. The resident was independent with eating. Resident #07's had no identified behaviors. Review of Resident #07's plan of care dated 09/05/19 revealed no focus or interventions related to inappropriate sexual behaviors or the medication Medroxyprogesterone (Provera). Review of Resident #07's physician order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
STEIN, MARKIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 08/01/2023
TENENBAUM, MICHAELIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 08/01/2023
REEDY, RITAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/07/2023
FERGUSON, HAROLDIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$2.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-33.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$97K
Related-party expense3% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 79%Medicare 2%Other / private 19%

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $97K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$317per resident / day
operating cost
$9,639per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$237per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365595. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next