No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Continuing Healthcare Of Gahanna

167 North Stygler Road, Gahanna, OH 43230 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 94 certified beds · (614) 475-8778 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus Facility (federal watch list)Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent May 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0744, F0758)2 immediate-jeopardy citations$366,645 in federal fines2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it’s on the federal Special Focus watch list for a persistent pattern of problems
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent May 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (114) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $366,645 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-21)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

/5
CMS overall
Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verifiedNot rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ)Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facilityNot rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
60 N STYGLER Rd · (614) 475-2014 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
60 N Stygler Rd · (800) 746-7287 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
380 Agler Rd. · (614) 370-8593 · Call to confirm hours
Park
101 Mill St · (614) 342-4250 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
350 N Stygler Rd · (614) 383-8713

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measuresNot rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-02, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

CMS has published no overall rating for this home since 2026-02 — most often because it is a Special Focus Facility, whose rating CMS withholds. The line above is where the record stops; we do not carry the last star forward, and it is not this home’s rating today.

Overall ratingnot rated now
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.0%5.3%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.8%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.8%0.2%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.6%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.3%3.2%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.0%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.3%25.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.1%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.1%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.6%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.6%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.5%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.6%75.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission10.9%24.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.5%12.9%12.0%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.21U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.36
RN hours/ resident / day
1.10
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.66
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.11
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.19
RN hoursweekends
55.8%
Total nursing turnover
45.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 94 beds and averages 90.9 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.11 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.66 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.26 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-21)
29
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-12)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

114 citations, most serious first. The 18 most serious are shown; the remaining 96 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, review of hospital records, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #99's continuity of care information from the hospital to the facility was reviewed and implemented. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious life-threatening injuries, negative health outcomes and/or death on [DATE] when Resident #99 returned from the hospital with injuries sustained from a fall including two new fractures of the spine, a closed head injury, a hematoma of the left thigh, and anemia which required ongoing evaluation and treatment which was not identified or implemented by facility staff. Consequently, the resident sustained an additional fall on [DATE] and was admitted to the hospital where he was found to have acute blood loss anemia requiring a transfusion with packed red blood cells. This affected one (Resident #99) of six residents reviewed for continuity of care upon return from the hospital. The facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital records, review of fall investigations, staff interviews, and review of facility policy for falls, the facility failed to timely assess and develop comprehensive plans of care for residents with a history of falls prior to admission, failed to complete thorough fall investigations and implement timely and appropriate interventions for the residents with falls in the facility resulting in injuries. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy when Resident #99 had four falls in eight days resulting in the resident being sent to the hospital on two occasions and suffering injuries including a closed head injury on 06/24/25, two fractures of the lumbar spine on 06/24/25, a large hematoma to the left thigh on 06/24/25, and acute blood loss anemia resulting from falls which required a blood transfusion on 06/26/25; and when Resident #88 had two falls in seven days resulting in the resident being admitted to the hospital on two separate occasions and suffering injuries…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, review of hospital discharge documents, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's diabetes was managed when going on Leave of Absences (LOAs). This resulted in Actual Harm on 03/06/26 when Resident #14 went on an undisclosed LOA and went to the Emergency Department (ED) with low blood sugar. This affected one (Resident #14) of one resident reviewed for diabetes management and LOAs. The facility census was 92. Findings Include:Review of Resident #14's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/14/25 and medical diagnoses including anxiety, borderline intellectual disability, cholecystitis, cognitive impairment, developmental delay, diabetes mellitus, gastroparesis, gastroesophageal reflux, irritable bowel syndrome, anemia, diabetic retinopathy of both eyes, chronic kidney disease, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, pulmonary embolism, and need for a guardian for healthcare decisions. Review of Resident #14's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-10-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure skin assessments were completed, failed to monitor and remove sutures timely and as ordered, failed to initiate wound care and failed to arrange transportation for a follow up appointment. This affected seven residents (Residents #13, #52, #233, and #246) of 29 residents reviewed during the annual survey. The facility census was 84. Actual harm occurred to Resident #52 when the facility failed to assess the resident's skin and Resident #52 developed two new vascular wounds to his feet resulting in the resident experiencing pain and additional medical treatment. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #52 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance, polyneuropathy, adult failure to thrive, insomnia, and depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-10-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to provide pressure ulcer wound care as ordered by the physician. This affected one resident (Resident #240) of one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 84 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #240's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/06/22 and diagnoses including quadriplegia, type two diabetes, morbid obesity, colostomy and anemia. Review of Resident #240's admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #240 was cognitively intact, did not display behaviors and had an indwelling catheter and ostomy. Resident #240 was at risk for developing pressure ulcers and had had two Stage 3 pressure ulcers (defined as full-thickness loss of skin, in which subcutaneous fat may be visible in the ulcer and granulation tissue and rolled wound edges are often present. Slough and/or eschar may be visible but does not obscure the depth of tissue loss) that were present upon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-10-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Record review for Resident #59 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, mild cognitive impairment, muscle weakness, violent behavior, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance, and depression. Review of the admission MDS assessment, dated 08/15/22, revealed this resident was assessed to have moderately impaired cognition evidenced by a BIMS assessment score of 04. This resident was assessed to require extensive assistance from one staff member for bed mobility and transfers and to be dependent on one staff member for toileting. Review of the care plan, dated 08/09/22, revealed this resident was at risk for elopement. Interventions included to follow facility elopement procedures. Review of the progress note, dated 09/15/22, revealed this resident was found outside in the front stating he was leaving and no one could stop him. Social Service Director, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), and the Administrator assisted in getting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-10-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 9a . Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed an admission date of 08/10/22. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, non-dominant, left side (L)hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction (CVA), hypertension (HTN), heart disease, and dysphagia. Review of the comprehensive MDS assessment, dated 08/17/22, revealed the resident had intact cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 (no impairment) and no documented behaviors. The resident required limited to extensive assistance of one to two or more staff for all Activities of daily Living (ADL's). Review of the resident's weights revealed he was weighed per facility policy on admission which measured 168 pounds (lbs.), but no weight was obtained the next day per policy. Further review of the resident's weights revealed the resident was not weighted again after admission until 12 days later, 08/22/22 when he weighed 168.8 lbs. despite the facility policy stating the resident was to be weighed weekly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2022-10-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Record review for Resident #11 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including fibromyalgia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, low back pain, osteoarthritis, pain in right leg, pain in left leg, and depression. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment, dated 06/25/22, revealed this resident had intact cognition evidenced by a BIMS assessment score of 13. This resident was assessed to require supervision from one staff for bed mobility and toileting and to be independent with setup help only for transfers and eating. This resident was assessed to have had pain in the past five days which limited day to day activities. Review of care plan, revised 03/17/20, revealed this resident had the potential for an alteration in comfort. Interventions included to administer medications as ordered to manage pain. Review of the active physicians order, dated 06/16/22, revealed an order to administer one Norco 5-325 milligram tablet three times a day for chronic bilateral leg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observation, resident and staff interviews, and record review ,the facility failed to ensure staff provided adequate supervision to prevent a resident, with altered mental status and was an elopement risk, from leaving the facility unsupervised. This affected one (Resident #33) of two residents reviewed for elopement risk. The facility census was 87. Findings include:Review of hospital documentation dated from 05/31/26 to 06/09/26 revealed Resident #33 was hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of dementia and was alert and oriented to self at baseline.Review of the medical record revealed Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included non traumatic subdural hemorrhage, cerebral infarction, dementia, and hearing loss.Review of the care plan dated 06/10/26 revealed Resident #33 was identified as an elopement risk. Interventions included to monitor location frequently throughout the shift, maintain safety during wandering, initiate elopement procedures if the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, review of the self-reported incidents, review of facility witness statements, staff and resident interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse. This affected one (Resident #26) out of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 90. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 03/01/24. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and type two diabetes. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 dated 03/02/26 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, revealed Resident #26 had mild cognitive impairment. Further review of the medical record revealed the resident had a Guardian of Person since 2021. Interview on 06/10/26 at 10:01 A.M., with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed Resident #26 reported abuse to their caseworker, referring to the residents Guardian, but what the resident reported was different to what she told Social Services. The DON reported a head-to-toe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interviews, review of the facility soft file, and facility policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of staff to resident abuse. This affected one (Resident #26) out of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 90.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 03/01/24. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and type two diabetes.Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 dated 03/02/26 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, revealed Resident #26 had mild cognitive impairment. Further review of the medical record revealed the resident had a Guardian of Person since 2021.Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed no documentation of the abuse allegation or investigation details.Interview on 06/10/26 at 10:01 A.M., with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed Resident #26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of the facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to maintain a resident's dignity in regard to urinary catheters. This affected one resident (#92) of one resident reviewed for catheters. The census was 88. Findings include:Review of Resident #92's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included encephalopathy, diabetes, cerebral infarction, and high blood pressure.On 05/20/26 at 9:11 A.M. observation revealed Resident #92's urinary catheter bag was observed hanging on the bed uncovered facing the door. Yellow urine was noted in the drainage bag. The urinary catheter bag was in view of staff, residents, and visitors in the hallway.On 05/20/26 at 9:30 A.M. observation revealed Resident #92's urinary catheter bag was hanging on the resident's bed uncovered facing the door. Yellow urine was noted in the drainage bag. The urinary catheter bag was in view of staff, residents, and visitors in the hallway.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide resident privacy during treatment of a pressure wound. This affected one resident (#16 ) of two residents observed for wound care. The census was 88. Findings include:Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cirrhosis of the liver, depression, HTN, anxiety, urinary retention, adult failure to thrive, and alcohol dependence. Review of the admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed her cognition was intact. She required set up or clean up assistance with eating, oral hygiene, and was dependent on staff for toileting, shower/bathing, dressing lower body, turning and repositioning and partial/moderate assistance for personal hygiene. The resident was always incontinent of bowel. On 05/21/26 at 9:14 A.M. observation of a dressing change to Resident #16's sacrum revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #101 left the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of self reported incident (SRI) and the police report revealed the facility failed to prevent staff to resident verbal abuse. This affected one resident (#89) of ten residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 88. Findings include:Review of Resident #89's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included osteomyelitis of the right ankle and foot, ulcers of the foot, diabetes, right BKA, absence of the left leg and disorder of the kidney. Review of the minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was intact. He required set up or clean-up assistance for eating, oral hygiene, toileting, dressing and personal hygiene, and supervision or touching assistance for shower/bathing. The resident was always continent of bladder and occasionally incontinent of bowel.Review of the Self-Reported Incident (SRI) dated 04/24/26 at 10:00 A.M. revealed the Administrator and Resident #89 were having a conversation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive weekly assessments of residents with pressure ulcers and failed to ensure pressure relief interventions were in place. This affected two residents (#16, #77) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The census was 88 Findings include:1.Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cirrhosis of the liver, depression, HTN, anxiety, urinary retention, adult failure to thrive, and alcohol dependence. Review of Resident #16's pressure ulcer risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was identified to be high risk for pressure ulcer development.Review of Resident #16's plan of care dated 03/20/26 revealed the resident has pressure injuries and is at risk for further skin breakdown, infection, worsening of existing pressure injury, new pressure injury for coccyx. Interventions included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure a resident with impaired skin integrity received the necessary care and treatment to promote healing of wounds on her foot. This affected one resident (#7) of three residents reviewed for wounds. The census was 88. Findings include:Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included aphasia, high blood pressure, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, and idiopathic peripheral neuropathy. Review of physician orders revealed an order dated 05/12/26 to conduct weekly skin evaluations. Staff were to document under assessments - Skin Observations. Staff were to notify the physician of new skin conditions one time a day every Tuesday for skin assessment.Review of Resident #7's admission skin assessment dated [DATE] revealed two areas were noted on the bottom of the right foot. The areas were noted as hard calloused areas that were not open.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with an urinary catheter received appropriate care and services. This affected one resident (#92) of two residents reviewed for urinary catheters. The census was 88. Findings include:Review of Resident #92's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included encephalopathy, diabetes, cerebral infarction, and high blood pressure. The resident had an indwelling urinary catheter. Review of the resident's medical record revealed no evidence of any physician orders for the resident's urinary catheter and no evidence of any orders for catheter care. In addition, review of the medical record revealed no evidence any care was provided to the resident's indwelling urinary catheter.On 05/20/26 at 9:11 A.M. observation revealed Resident #92's urinary catheter was draining yellow urine.On 05/26/26 at 11:25 A.M. interview with the Director of Nursing verified no evidence of physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-21 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on employee file reviews and interviews, the facility failed to do annual evaluations for Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) and to provide a minimum of 12 hours of in-service for the previous year. This affected three (CNAs #242, #324, and #325) of the three employee files reviewed for CNAs employed for more than one year. This has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 91. Review of employee files for CNAs #242, #324, and #325 revealed no annual evaluations were completed in the last 12 months. There was also no documentation of in-service education.Interview on 04/07/26 at 1:00 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed there was no record of CNA education (12 hours for the last year) and there was no record of performance evaluations in the past 12 months for the CNAs whose employee files were reviewed.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 96 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident medical record review, review of medication regimen reviews, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to complete medication regimen reviews (MRR). This affected four residents (Resident #02, #03, #93, and #99) out of five reviewed for unnecessary medication. The facility census was 91.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #93 revealed an admission date of 03/01/24 with diagnoses of, but not limited to, bipolar disorder, heart failure, and major depressive disorder. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 dated 03/02/26 reveled Resident #93 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicative of cognitive impairment. Review of the MRR's provided by the facility revealed no MRRs for April, May, July, and August of 2025 for Resident #93. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #99 revealed an admission date of 06/29/23 with diagnoses of, but not limited to, epilepsy, major depressive disorder, and unspecified systolic heart failure.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of resident medical record, physician orders, medication administration record, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for blood pressure medication. This affected one resident (Resident #93) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 91.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #93 revealed an admission date of 03/01/24 with diagnoses of, but not limited to hypertension, heart failure, and chronic atrial fibrillation.Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 dated 03/02/26 reveled Resident #93 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicative of a moderate cognitive impairment.Review of the physician orders for Resident #93 revealed an order for metoprolol tartrate oral tablet 50 milligrams (MG) give one tablet by mouth two times a day for hypertension, with parameters to hold for a systolic blood pressure under 110 or heart rate under 60.Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for January 2026 revealed the medication was administered during the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to honor one resident's preference of no male caregivers. This affected one resident (#17) of three residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility census was 83. Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an initial admission date of 10/08/24 with the diagnoses including but not limited to other specific arthropathies right shoulder, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, pain in right shoulder and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Review of the resident's medical record revealed no plan of care addressing the resident's preference of no male caregivers. Review of the resident's psychiatric note dated 01/28/25 revealed the resident was physically abused by her ex-husband and had trust issues. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had no cognitive impairment. On 08/19/25 at 10:48 A.M., an observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's bed was bariatric in size. This affected one resident (#17) of three residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility census was 83. Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an initial admission date of 10/08/24 with the diagnoses including but not limited to other specific arthropathies right shoulder, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, pain in right shoulder and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had no cognitive impairment. On 08/19/25 at 9:00 A.M., observation of Resident #17 revealed the resident was obese and was too large for the standard bed she occupied. Interview with the resident at the time of the observation revealed she had asked for a larger bed, however the room was not large enough. On 08/20/25 at 1:05 P.M., an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the power of attorney (POA) of a change in condition. This affected one resident (#43) of three residents reviewed for notification. The facility census was 83. Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an initial admission date of 07/21/23 with the latest readmission of 03/21/24 with diagnoses including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), psoriasis, protein calorie malnutrition, dysphagia, seizures, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, asthma, major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder. Review of the plan of care dated 02/15/24 revealed the resident had a seizure disorder. Interventions included give medications as ordered, monitor/document for effectiveness and side effects, give seizure medication as ordered by doctor, monitor/document side effects and effectiveness, obtain and monitor lab/diagnostic work as ordered, report results to physician and follow up as indicated, post…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interviews, review of the facility's self-reported incidents (SRI) and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the required state agency. This affected one resident (#17) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 83. Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an initial admission date of 10/08/24 with the diagnoses including but not limited to other specific arthropathies right shoulder, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, pain in right shoulder and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had no cognitive impairment. On 08/20/25 at 9:00 A.M., an interview with Resident #17 revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #116 had abused her. She revealed the LPN entered her room to apply cream to her legs and she told him she did not like men touching her and preferred female caregivers. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interviews, review of the facility's self-reported incidents (SRI) and facility policy review, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse. This affected one resident (#17) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 83.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an initial admission date of 10/08/24 with the diagnoses including but not limited to other specific arthropathies right shoulder, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, pain in right shoulder and gastro-esophageal reflux disease.Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had no cognitive impairment.On 08/20/25 at 9:00 A.M., an interview with Resident #17 revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #116 had abused her. She revealed the LPN entered her room to apply cream to her legs and she told him she did not like men touching her and preferred female caregivers. The resident revealed the LPN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interviews, the facility failed to identify, assess and implement care and services to prevent triggers of past trauma. This affected one resident (#17) of three residents reviewed for preferences. The facility census was 83. Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an initial admission date of 10/08/24 with the diagnoses including but not limited to other specific arthropathies right shoulder, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, pain in right shoulder and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Review of the resident's initial social service assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had no Trauma Informed Care Triggers. Review of the resident's psychiatric note dated 01/28/25 revealed the resident was physically abused by her ex-husband and had trust issues. The resident also reported having medical conditions that had caused trauma her life like a brain aneurysm. The assessment indicated the resident reported the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. This affected one resident (#17) of three residents reviewed for preferences. The facility census was 83. Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an initial admission date of 10/08/24 with the diagnoses including but not limited to other specific arthropathies right shoulder, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, pain in right shoulder and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Review of the resident's psychiatric note dated 01/28/25 revealed the resident was physically abused by her ex-husband and had trust issues. The resident also reported having medical conditions that had caused trauma her life like a brain aneurysm. The assessment indicated the resident reported the development of emotional and behavioral symptoms in response to an identifiable stressor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as physician ordered. This affected one resident (#17) of three residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 83.Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an initial admission date of 10/08/24 with the diagnoses including but not limited to other specific arthropathies right shoulder, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, pain in right shoulder and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Review of the plan of care dated 10/24/24 revealed the resident had hypertension. Interventions included to administer hypertensive medications as ordered, monitor for side effects and effectiveness, obtain blood pressure readings every shift and as needed and take the blood pressure under the same condition each time. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left at bedside during medication administration. This affected one resident (#17) of three residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 83.Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an initial admission date of 10/08/24 with the diagnoses including but not limited to other specific arthropathies right shoulder, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, pain in right shoulder and gastro-esophageal reflux disease.Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had no cognitive impairment. On 08/19/25 at 10:48 A.M., observation of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #202 administer Resident #17's morning medications revealed the LPN removed a clear plastic cup from the top drawer of the cart with Resident #17's name written on the side. The plastic cup had one small…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, review of the facilities Self-Reported Incidents (SRI) and review of the facility abuse policy, the facility failed to timely report an allegation of staff-to-resident physical abuse to the State Survey Agency, Ohio Department of Health. This affected one (Resident #88) out of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 87.Review of the closed medical record for Resident #88 revealed an admission date of 12/31/24 and a discharge date of 06/19/25. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, psychosis, mood disorder, chronic pancreatitis, and repeated falls. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/19/25, revealed Resident #88 had minimal cognitive impairment. Review of the hospital documentation dated 06/19/25 revealed Resident #88 was sent out from the facility regarding a fall with injuries. While at the hospital, Resident #88 reported he was forced out of his chair by facility staff and this was the reason he fell. Resident #88 was documented as having two rib fractures, a right humerus…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facilities abuse policy, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of staff-to-resident physical abuse. This affected one (Resident #88) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 87.Review of the closed medical record for Resident #88 revealed an admission date of 12/31/24 and a discharge date of 06/19/25. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, psychosis, mood disorder, chronic pancreatitis, and repeated falls. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #88 had minimal cognitive impairment. The resident was assessed as having one fall with major injury, and required supervision or touching assistance from staff with toileting, bathing and the used of a wheeled walker for ambulation. Review of the hospital documentation from 06/19/25 revealed Resident #88 was sent out from the facility regarding a fall with injuries. While at the hospital, Resident #88 reported he had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected the resident's falls in the facility. This affected two (#91 and #99) out of the six residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 87.1. Closed record review for Resident #99 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included muscle wasting and history of falling. Record review for Resident #99 revealed the resident had a fall on 06/18/25 in which he scraped his elbow, had a fall on 06/22/25 in which he sustained an abrasion to the left side of his nose, and had a fall on 06/24/25 which resulted in two fractures of the lumbar spine, a closed head injury, a hematoma to the left thigh, and a laceration to the right side of his eye. Additionally, the resident had a fall on 06/26/25 and was admitted to the hospital with acute blood loss anemia. Review of the discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/26/25, revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure new interventions to prevent falls were added to the care plan timely. This affected one (#99) of six residents whose care plans were reviewed for falls. The facility census was 87.Closed record review for Resident #99 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included difficulty walking and history of falling. The resident was discharged from the facility on 06/26/25. Review of the comprehensive care plan, dated 06/06/25, revealed Resident #99 was at risk for falls and injuries as evidenced by history of, may not always recognize own needs or limitations, metabolic encephalopathy, Parkinson’s disease, cognitive deficits, and history of amnesia. The goal was for Resident #99 to be free from falls/injuries over the next 90 days. The interventions did not change from the baseline care plan. Interventions dated 06/06/25 included to anticipate needs – provide prompt assistance, ensure lighting was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-12 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Record review of Resident #11 revealed an admission date with 04/13/22 with pertinent diagnoses of: cerebral palsy, hemiplegia, protein calorie malnutrition, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, hypertension, convulsions, mood disorder, depression, benign paroxysmal vertigo, schizoaffective disorder, anxiety disorder, and calculus of kidney. Review of the 01/19/25 annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the Resident was cognitively intact and used a walker and wheelchair to aid in mobility. The Resident required supervision or touching assistance for personal hygiene. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #11 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the medical records revealed on 12/09/24 Resident #11 discharged to the hospital for a nephrostomy tube removal and returned 12/12/24. Review of the Bed Hold Notice dated 12/10/24 revealed Resident #11's bed was to be held at no cost to them for up to 30 days if they went to the hospital per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 5. Record review of Resident #74 revealed an admission date of 10/11/24 with pertinent diagnosis of: traumatic brain injury, dysarthria following cerebral infarction, type two diabetes mellitus, seizures, post traumatic stress disorder, history of falling, presence of cerebrospinal fluid drainage device, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, dementia without behaviors, noninfective gastroenteritis, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of the 01/16/25 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the Resident was severely cognitively impaired and used a wheelchair to aid in mobility. The Resident had a coded diagnosis of post traumatic stress disorder. Review of the 12/17/24 Notice of Level II PASSR outcome revealed Resident #74 is approved for six months in the Nursing facility and is required services to include: A behavior management safety plan to decrease inappropriate behaviors and ensure safety. Ongoing evaluation of the effectiveness of current psychotropic medications on target…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Record review of Resident #63 revealed an admission date of 06/29/23 with pertinent diagnoses of: hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left nondominant side, epilepsy, human immunodeficiency virus, unspecified asthma, muscle wasting and atrophy, abnormalities of gait and mobility, anemia, autoimmune hepatitis, low back pain, congestive heart failure, and personal history of sudden cardiac arrest. Review of the 01/03/25 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the Resident is cognitively intact and uses a wheelchair to aid in mobility. Review of the 01/31/25 smoking assessment revealed that staff will store Resident #63 smoking materials. Observation on 03/03/25 at 1:33 P.M. revealed Resident #63 had a lighter in her room. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 03/06/25 at 2:33 P.M. revealed she did the smoking assessment and the resident should not have cigarettes or smoking supplies in her room. That way she does not smoke in her room. Observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #30 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included heart failure, chronic respiratory failure, type II diabetes, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and mood disorder. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #30 was cognitively intact. The MDS also revealed Resident #30 had a mood score of 10 which typically indicated a moderate level of depression. Resident #30 had no delusions during the assessment time period. Review of the pharmacy monthly reviews from June 2024 through February 2025 revealed no documentation if Resident #30 had any recommendations. A recommendation dated 06/12/24 was provided that revealed Resident #30 was ordered Invega Sustenna (antipsychotic) one milliliter intramuscularly every 28 days for bipolar. The recommendation revealed a supportive diagnosis including target behaviors that were continuously occurring needed to be in the order. On 06/12/24 the physician added the diagnosis of bipolar…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure foods that did not meet hot holding temperature were reheated. This had the potential to affect 79 of 79 residents who consumed food from the kitchen. The facility identified two residents (#69 and #80) who consumed nothing from the kitchen. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Observation on 03/05/25 beginning at 11:00 A.M. of the lunch meal revealed [NAME] #196 taking the temperature of food on the hot holding unit. The ground chicken for residents on a mechanical soft diet was 122 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and the gravy was 102 degrees F. [NAME] #196 noted that these items needed heated back up, but began tray line anyway. [NAME] #196 noted the gravy was for residents who did not like sweet potatoes and received mashed potatoes instead. At the end of meal service [NAME] #196 verified she had not reheated the food items. Interview on 03/05/25 at 12:40 P.M. with Dietary Manager #115 revealed he expected foods on the steamtable to be 160 degrees F, and if they did not reach that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-12 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of documents the facility failed to ensure the arbitration agreement allowed the resident/responsible party to communicate with federal, state, or local officials . This had the potential to affect 23 residents (#2, #6, #8, #17, #26, #40, #45, #49, #72, #76, #78, #80, #82, #83, #84, #188, #189, #190, #191, #192, #193, #194, #196) who had admitted since 08/01/24. The total facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of the 'Voluntary Arbitration Agreement' undated, revealed it did not address the resident/responsible party's right to communicate with federal, state, or local officials. Interview on 03/10/25 at 10:04 A.M. and 12:42 P.M. with the Administrator revealed he was unable to find evidence the arbitration agreement allowed for communication with officials. Interview on 03/10/25 at 12:42 P.M. with the Administrator revealed the current company took over in August 2024, and all residents admitted since then had signed the arbitration agreement.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-12 · tag F0848 — pattern
    Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of documents the facility failed to ensure the arbitration agreement allowed for a convenient venue and neutral arbitrator. This had the potential to affect 23 residents (#2, #6, #8, #17, #26, #40, #45, #49, #72, #76, #78, #80, #82, #83, #84, #188, #189, #190, #191, #192, #193, #194, #196) who had admitted since 08/01/24. The total facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of the 'Voluntary Arbitration Agreement' undated, revealed it did not address the venue for arbitration. It additionally did not allow for a neutral arbitrator. It indicated the arbitration would be administered by the American Arbitrators Associations (AAA). If the AAA does not enforce pre-dispute arbitration agreements than any other reasonably comparable arbitration association would be chosen by the facility. Interview on 03/10/25 at 10:04 A.M. and 12:42 P.M. with the Administrator revealed he was unable to find evidence the arbitration agreement allowed for a convenient venue or neutral arbitrator. Interview on 03/10/25 at 12:42 P.M. with the Administrator revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of resident medical records, the facility failed to ensure Resident #192's dignity was maintained when his catheter bag was uncovered. This affected one Resident #192 of one resident reviewed for catheters. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Observation on 03/05/25 at 12:30 P.M. and 12:48 P.M. revealed Resident #192 sitting in the common area with other residents. His catheter bag was observed uncovered and with urine observed in the bag. Interview on 03/05/25 at 12:48 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified the catheter bag was uncovered. Interview on 03/10/25 at 12:25 P.M. with the Administrator revealed an uncovered catheter bag was a dignity issue. Review of Resident #192's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/16/25 with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, type two diabetes mellitus, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia, aphasia, contracture of right knee, psychosis, and heart failure. Review of Resident #192's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy the facility failed to ensure that Resident #84 and #8 had appropriate diagnoses for the psychotropic medications they were prescribed. This affected two (Resident's #84 and #8 ) out of three residents reviewed for psychotropic medications. The facility census was 83. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #84 revealed an admission date of 08/04/25 with diagnoses including Malignant neoplasm of unspecified part of unspecified bronchus or lung, unspecified dementia with psychotic disturbance, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, transient cerebral ischemic attack unspecified, essential primary hypertension, hyperlipidemia unspecified, other nonspecific abnormal finding of lung field, anemia unspecified, fecal impaction, type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, and acute kidney failure unspecified. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment for Resident #84 revealed a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 06 out of 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #85's discharge from the facility was appropriately documented. This affected one Resident #85 of five residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of Resident #85's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/27/25 and a discharge date of 01/28/25 diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, heart failure, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, type two diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #85's progress note dated 01/27/25 revealed the resident admitted to the facility around 5:30 P.M. Review of Resident #85's progress note dated 01/28/25 at 11:14 A.M. revealed the resident was not administered medication because she was in the hospital. Review of Resident #85's medical record revealed no further documentation related to her discharge. Interview on 03/05/25 at 12:40 P.M. and on 03/06/25 at 11:10 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified there was no documentation related to the resident's transfer to the hospital. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record and interview with the staff the facility failed to ensure a Significant Change assessment was completed for Resident #42 after initiating hospice services. This affected one resident (Resident #42) of 24 residents reviewed for comprehensive assessments. Facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #42 was admitted on [DATE], readmitted on [DATE] and expired on [DATE]. Resident #42 had diagnoses that included lumbar degeneration, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, alcoholic cirrhosis of liver, anxiety, chronic viral hepatitis C, seizures, and psychosis. Review of physician order dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 was admitted to hospice. Further review of the medical record revealed there was no evidence of a Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed within 14-days of receiving hospice services for Resident #42. The annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 had cognitive impairment. Section J1400 of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #69 and Resident #192 had accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessments. This affected two Residents #69 and #192 of 24 medical records reviewed. The facility census was 81. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #192's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/16/25 with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, type two diabetes mellitus, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia, aphasia, contracture of right knee, psychosis, and heart failure. Review of Resident #192's social service assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a severe cognitive impairment but had been able to answer some questions for the brief interview of mental status (BIMS). Review of Resident #192's comprehensive MDS 3.0 dated 02/20/25 revealed he was in a persistent vegetative state (PVS) or had no discernible consciousness. Review of the Long Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review the facility failed to incorporate the recommendations of the pre-admission screening and resident review (PASRR) level II determination into the assessment, care planning, and transitions of care. This affected one, Resident #74, of two Residents reviewed for PASRR. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Record review of Resident #74 revealed an admission date of 10/11/24 with pertinent diagnoses of: traumatic brain injury, dysarthria following cerebral infarction, type two diabetes mellitus, seizures, post-traumatic stress disorder, history of falling, presence of cerebrospinal fluid drainage device, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, dementia without behaviors, noninfective gastroenteritis, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of the 01/16/25 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the Resident was severely cognitively impaired and used a wheelchair to aid in mobility. The Resident had a coded diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder. Review of the 12/17/24 Notice of Level II PASRR outcome…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) documents were accurate regarding resident current conditions and diagnoses. This affected one, Resident #11, of two residents reviewed for PASRR documents. The census was 81. Findings Include: Record review of Resident #11 revealed an admission date with 04/13/22 with pertinent diagnoses of: cerebral palsy, hemiplegia, hydronephrosis, protein calorie malnutrition, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, hypertension, convulsions, mood disorder, depression, benign paroxysmal vertigo, schizoaffective disorder, anxiety disorder, and calculus of kidney. Review of the 01/19/25 annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #11 was cognitively intact and used a walker and wheelchair to aid in mobility. The Resident required supervision or touching assistance for personal hygiene. Review of the 05/11/22 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review identification screen (PASRR) revealed the Resident had documented diagnosis of only mood disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure an accurate baseline care plan was developed and implemented within 48 hours of admission. This affected one, Resident #88, out of six residents reviewed for baseline care plans. Facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #88 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 01/31/25 with diagnoses that included encounter for surgical aftercare, type II diabetes, Crohn's disease, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, major depressive disorder, chronic kidney disease, colostomy, malignant neoplasm of colon, and psychosis. Review of the admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #88 was alert and oriented, had a colostomy incision and bag and a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube. Review of the baseline care plan dated 01/28/25 revealed Resident #88 was incontinent of bowel and bladder and required supervision/touch assistance for toileting hygiene. The PEG tube was the only thing marked for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident #68's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/25/24 and diagnoses including cerebral infarction, apraxia, seizures, heart failure, anxiety disorder, hypertension, end stage renal disease with dependence on renal dialysis, coagulation defect, aphasia, muscle wasting and atrophy, altered mental status, and other lack of coordination. Review of Resident #68's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed she had severely impaired cognition. Review of Resident #68's medical record revealed she had two care conferences on 02/26/24 and 09/10/24. Interview on 03/03/25 at 4:42 P.M. with Resident #68's responsible party revealed care conferences were far in between. Interview on 03/03/25 at 9:13 A.M. and 9:43 A.M. with Social Work Director #211 verified Resident #68 had only had two care conferences since admission, and they were supposed to occur quarterly. Review of the policy 'care plan meeting' dated June 2024 revealed care plans were to be scheduled on admission,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, hospital record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, resident centered wound management program for Resident #45 who sustained an injury/area of non-pressure related skin impairment to the right lower leg. This affected one (#45) of two reviewed for skin impairments. The total facility census was 81. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #45 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included prepatellar bursitis of the left knee, cellulitis of the right lower limb, cerebral infarction, dependence on renal dialysis, end stage renal disease, and type II diabetes. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 01/05/25, revealed Resident #45 was cognitively intact and used a wheelchair. The resident did not receive scheduled pain medication but did receive as needed pain medication for occasional pain rated a four out of ten pain rating (on a 0-10 pain scale with zero…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure Residents #68 and #69 who had splints or braces had orders for the device and orders for monitoring for their use. This affected two residents (#68 and #69) of three residents reviewed for positioning and mobility. The facility census was 81. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #69's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/05/23 with diagnoses including anoxic brain damage, respiratory failure, protein-calorie malnutrition, persistent vegetative state, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, gastrostomy, tracheostomy, aphasia, and contractures to right and left knee. Review of Resident #69's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed he had an upper extremity impairment on both sides. Review of Resident #69's occupational therapies Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed a discharge recommendations of splinting as tolerated to both elbows and hands. Review of Resident #69's plan of care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #192 had orders for an indwelling catheter. This affected one resident (#192) of three residents with an indwelling catheter. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of Resident #192's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/16/25 with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, type two diabetes mellitus, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia, aphasia, contracture of right knee, psychosis, and heart failure. Review of Resident #192's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 dated 02/20/25 revealed he had an indwelling catheter. Review of Resident #192's physician orders revealed he had no orders for an indwelling catheter or for catheter care. Observation on 03/03/25 at 10:15 A.M. revealed Resident #192 had a catheter bag hanging from his bed. Interview on 03/05/25 at 2:50 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified Resident #192 had a catheter in place but had no orders or documentation for care.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #68's fluid restriction was followed, and her noncompliance was documented in the medical record. This affected one resident (#68) of two residents on dialysis. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of Resident #68's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/25/24 and diagnoses including cerebral infarction, apraxia, seizures, heart failure, anxiety disorder, hypertension, end stage renal disease with dependence on renal dialysis, coagulation defect, aphasia, muscle wasting and atrophy, altered mental status, and other lack of coordination. Review of Resident #68's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed she had severely impaired cognition. Review of Resident #68's active physician order started 09/08/24 revealed an order for Nepro (a renal liquid supplement) 240 milliliters (ml) three times a day. Review of Resident #68's active physician order dated 10/15/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #69's tube feeding was running at the ordered rate. This affected one resident (#69) of one resident reviewed for tube feeding. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of Resident #69's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/05/23 with diagnoses including anoxic brain damage, respiratory failure, protein-calorie malnutrition, persistent vegetative state, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, gastrostomy, tracheostomy, aphasia, and contractures to right and left knee. Review of Resident #69's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was receiving tube feeding that provided 51% or more of calories and 501 milliliters (ml) per day. Review of Resident #69's plan of care dated 10/10/23 revealed the resident required tube feeding via a gastrostomy tube related to dysphagia. Interventions included listening to lungs, elevating the head of bed 45 degrees, monitoring as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to administer oxygen to Resident #30 as ordered. This affected one (Resident #30) out of one resident reviewed of oxygen use. Facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #30 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included heart failure, chronic respiratory failure, type II diabetes, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and mood disorder. Review of physician order dated 11/01/24 revealed Resident #30 was ordered oxygen at two liters continuously. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #30 was cognitively intact. Review of the March medication administration record revealed Resident #30 was administered oxygen at two liters continuously. Observations on 03/03/25 at 8:39 A.M., 03/04/25 at 11:13 A.M., and 03/06/25 at 9:53 A.M. revealed Resident #30 had a nasal cannula in place and oxygen was being administered at four liters. Interview on 03/06/25 at 11:05…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) was appropriately assessed to identify the cause of the residents PTSD and minimize triggers and/or re-traumatization. This affected one (Resident #74) of three Residents reviewed for behavior emotional. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Record review of Resident #74 revealed an admission date of 10/11/24 with pertinent diagnosis of: traumatic brain injury, dysarthria following cerebral infarction, type two diabetes mellitus, seizures, post traumatic stress disorder, history of falling, presence of cerebrospinal fluid drainage device, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, dementia without behaviors, noninfective gastroenteritis, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of the 01/16/25 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the Resident was severely cognitively impaired and used a wheelchair to aid in mobility. The Resident had a coded diagnosis of post traumatic stress disorder. Interview with Resident #74's family on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with dementia received appropriate treatment and services to maintain his of highest practical physical, mental, and psychosocial well being when they failed to have a plan of care to address the resident's dementia needs and services. This affected one (Resident #74) of one reviewed for dementia care. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Record review of Resident #74 revealed an admission date of 10/11/24 with pertinent diagnoses of: traumatic brain injury, dysarthria following cerebral infarction, type two diabetes mellitus, seizures, post traumatic stress disorder, history of falling, presence of cerebrospinal fluid drainage device, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, dementia without behaviors, noninfective gastroenteritis, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of the 01/16/25 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the Resident was severely cognitively impaired and used a wheelchair to aid in mobility. The Resident had a coded diagnosis of dementia.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and facility staff interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure failed to ensure Resident #16 and #82 received medications as ordered. This affected two resident (Resident #16 and #82) of five reviewed for un necessary medications. The total facility census was 81. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #16 was admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bipolar disorder, altered mental status, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, major depressive disorder, history of transient ischemic attack, and anxiety disorder. The annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #16 was cognitively intact. Resident #16 had impairment to both lower extremities (amputation) and used a wheelchair. Resident #16 required supervision/touch assistance for rolling and transfers. Resident #16 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of current physician orders revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #45 and #66 had parameters in place for as needed pain medication. The facility also failed to document the location of the pain and the non-pharmacological interventions that were attempted. This affected two (Resident #45 and #66) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Facility census was 81. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #45 was admitted [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included prepatellar bursitis left knee, cellulitis of right lower limb, cerebral infarction, dependence on renal dialysis, end stage renal disease, and type II diabetes. Review of physician orders revealed on 01/02/25 Resident #45 was ordered Oxycodone (opioid for moderate to severe pain) five milligrams (mg) every eight hours as needed for pain. No pain scale parameters were included in the order. Review of the medication administration record (MAR) revealed Resident #45 was administered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #82 had appropriate diagnoses for the psychotropic medications he was prescribed. This affected one resident (#82) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of Resident #82's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/14/25 with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, chronic respiratory failure, protein-calorie malnutrition, cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia, anxiety disorder, heart failure, and other psychoactive substance dependence. Review of Resident #82's Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed he had severely impaired cognition. Review of Resident #82's physician order dated 03/02/25 revealed an order for Valproic acid (anticonvulsant that can also be used for bipolar disorder) solution 250 milligrams (mg) twice a day for anxiety. Review of Resident #82's physician order dated 03/02/25 revealed an order for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident laboratory tests (lab/labs) were completed as ordered. This affected two (Resident #63 and #82) of six resident reviewed for lab values. The facility census was 81. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #63 revealed an admission date of 06/29/23 with pertinent diagnoses of: hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left nondominant side, epilepsy, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), unspecified asthma, muscle wasting and atrophy, abnormalities of gait and mobility, anemia, autoimmune hepatitis, low back pain, congestive heart failure, and personal history of sudden cardiac arrest. Review of the 01/03/25 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the Resident was cognitively intact and used a wheelchair to aid in mobility. Review of a physician order dated 02/04/25 revealed to draw a complete blood count, complete metabolic panel, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) viral load, and a lipid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of the menu, the facility failed to ensure Resident #194 and Resident #196 received food according to the planned menu. This affected two residents (#194 and #196) of 79 residents who consumed food from the kitchen. The facility identified two residents (#69 and #80) who consumed nothing from the kitchen. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of Resident #196's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/05/25 with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, protein-calorie malnutrition, chronic respiratory failure, dysphagia, hypertension, chronic kidney disease stage four, and heart failure. Review of Resident #196's physician order dated 03/09/25 revealed an order for mechanical soft diet. Review of Resident #194's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/27/25 with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus, dysphagia, dementia, chronic kidney disease, and protein calorie malnutrition. Review of Resident #194's physician order dated 03/07/25 revealed she was on a mechanical soft and no added salt diet.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident discharge needs were met. This affected two residents (#22 and #33) of four residents reviewed for discharge planning. The facility census was 83. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, hypertension, and unspecified injury of head. Resident #22 was discharged from the facility on 12/19/24 to home. Review of a care plan dated 11/04/24 revealed no evidence of discharge goals for Resident #22. Review of a minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22's cognition remained intact. Review of an order dated 12/18/24 revealed Resident #22 was to discharge home with his family on 12/19/24 with physical therapy, occupational therapy, and skilled services. Review of a Discharge Summary and Instructions assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 would receive home health services…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, hospital record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, this facility failed to ensure appropriate care and monitoring was in place for a resident who was receiving medication for high blood pressure including the administration of blood pressure medication, personalized care plan for management of hypertension, and monitoring residents blood pressure to ensure the effectiveness of medication. This affected one (Resident #85) of the four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #85 revealed an admission date of 11/01/2023. Diagnoses included alcohol abuse, dysphasia, hypertension, hemorrhagic stroke (an emergency condition in which a ruptured blood vessel causes bleeding inside the brain usually caused by high blood pressure and trauma), and lack of coordination. Review of the Social Services Initial assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure physicians orders were followed in regard to laboratory (Lab) test. This affected two (Resident #57 and Resident #73) of four resident records reviewed. The census was 72. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #73's medical record revealed he was admitted tot he facility on 08/02/24 and discharged [DATE]. Diagnoses included Acute pancreatic, myelodysplastic syndrome, diabetes, , high blood pressure kidney failure, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, herpesviral infection and protein calorie malnutrition. Review of the discharge minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was intact. He required partial to moderate assistance with sitting to stand, chair to bed to chair, toilet transfer and shower and tub transfer. Review of the physicians orders dated 08/02/24 revealed basic metabolic profile (BMP) and liver function test (LFT) every day shift every Monday for Chronic Anemia and complete metabolic profile…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to properly store food items in a safe and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect 76 of 76 residents who eat food from the kitchen. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Observation of the refrigerator in the kitchen and interview with Dietary Manager #192 on 08/05/24 at 9:30 A.M. revealed multiple items not labeled or dated and expired items. Items identified as undated and/or unlabeled included a container of sweet and sour sauce that was three-fourths full, a container of salad dressing confirmed by Dietary Manager #192 to be poppy seed dressing, a half full milk gallon, and a three-fourths full milk gallon. The following items were expired in the refrigerator: a container of ranch dressing with a use by date of 07/18/24, a container of peanut butter and jelly with a use by date of 08/03/24, and a container of sour cream with a use by date of 07/29/24. Further observation of the kitchen revealed an ice scoop sitting in the ice in the ice machine and three individual ice cream cups in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, policy review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide timely assistance with eating for residents who required assistance from staff with activities of daily living. This affected two (Residents #3 and #17) of three residents reviewed for eating assistance. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 01/18/18. Diagnoses included blindness in right eye and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #17 had severe cognitive impairment and required maximum assistance from staff with eating. Review of the care plan dated 05/27/24 revealed Resident #17 was at risk for malnutrition related to vitamin D deficiency and visual impairment. An intervention included assistance with meals. Review of the facility's list of residents who required assistance with eating revealed Residents #17 was on the list. Observation on 08/05/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-15 · tag F0729 — widespread
    Verify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on nurse aide registry review, time punch detail review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) nurse aide registry was in good standing. This affected one out of three personnel files reviewed and had the potential to affect all 83 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: Review of the nurse aide registry for STNA #130 dated 02/07/24 revealed the STNA was not in good standing and was not eligible to work. Further review revealed STNA #130 had not changed her name on the nurse aide registry following a name change. Review of STNA #130's time punch card from 01/21/24 to 02/05/24 revealed the STNA was hired on 02/02/23. Further review revealed STNA #130 worked full time and last worked on 02/05/24 with the registry not in good standing and not eligible to work. On 02/07/24 at 2:32 P.M., interview with the Human Resource Director (HRD) verified STNA #130's nurse aide registry was not in good standing and she was not eligible to work. The HRD verified STNA #130 was employed full time and had been working when not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Assessments (MDS) were coded accurately in the area of skin for two residents (#79 and #80). This affected two (Resident #79 and #80) of four sampled residents. The facility census was 83. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #80 revealed an initial admission date of 01/11/24 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), epilepsy, arteriovenous malformation of cerebral vessels, cerebral infarct, adult failure to thrive, dysphagia, hypertension, abdominal aortic aneurysm, hyperlipidemia, peripheral vascular disease and disorder of thyroid. The resident discharged home on [DATE] with hospice services. Review of the resident's nursing admit/readmit care plan dated 01/11/24 revealed the resident was admitted from the local acute care hospital with pneumonia. The assessment indicated the resident was admitted to the facility with pressure to the sacrum, coccyx, right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive plan of care for residents in the area of skin and eating. This affected two (Resident #33 and #73) of four sampled residents. The facility census was 83. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an initial admission date of 09/21/23 with the latest readmission of 12/21/23 with the diagnoses including alcohol abuse, falls, cerebrovascular accident with left sided hemiplegia, generalized muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hypertension, unsteadiness on feet, muscle wasting and atrophy, hyperlipidemia, cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Review of the nursing admit/readmit care plan dated 09/21/23 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with no skin issues. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to identify, assess, monitor and implement interventions for Resident #33 who had multiple stasis ulcers. This affected one (Resident #33) of three residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 83. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an initial admission date of 09/21/23 with the latest readmission of 12/21/23 with the diagnoses including alcohol abuse, falls, cerebrovascular accident with left sided hemiplegia, generalized muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hypertension, unsteadiness on feet, muscle wasting and atrophy, hyperlipidemia, cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Review of the nursing admit/readmit no care plan dated 09/21/23 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with no skin issues. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an initial comprehensive wound assessment and subsequent wound assessments were conducted as required for one resident (#79) with a stage II (Partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red-pink wound bed, without slough or bruising. May also present as an intact or open/ ruptured blister.). This affected one ( Resident #79) of three residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 83. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #79 revealed an initial admission date of 10/05/23 with the diagnoses including anoxic brain damage, respiratory failure, disorder of the autoimmune nervous system, nondisplaced posterior arch fracture of first cervical vertebra, fracture of shaft of right fibula, fracture of shaft of left tibia, gastrostomy and tracheostomy. Review of the resident's Braden scale dated 10/05/23 revealed a score of eight indicating the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#33) received routine podiatry care. This affected one (Resident #33) of three reviewed for podiatry care. The facility census was 83. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an initial admission date of 09/21/23 with the latest readmission of 12/21/23 with the diagnoses including alcohol abuse, falls, cerebrovascular accident with left sided hemiplegia, generalized muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hypertension, unsteadiness on feet, muscle wasting and atrophy, hyperlipidemia, cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had no cognitive deficit. The assessment indicated the resident had one venous ulcer. Review of the medical record revealed no documented evidence the resident had received podiatry care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#73) was not provided food inconsistent with the physician ordered diet. This affected one of thee sampled residents reviewed for special diets. The facility census was 83. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #73 revealed an initial admission date of 07/21/23 with the latest readmission of 09/22/23 with the diagnoses including encephalopathy, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), decreased white blood cell count, generalized muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia, asthma and muscle wasting and atrophy. Review of the resident's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a severe cognitive deficit. Review of the monthly physician orders for February 2024 identified orders dated 12/28/23 regular pureed diet with special instructions for one on one supervision/assistance from caregivers/staff. Review of the resident's plan of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices to prevent the potential spread of infection during wound dressing change for one resident (#33). This affected one ( Resident #33) of three residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 83. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an initial admission date of 09/21/23 with the latest readmission of 12/21/23 with the diagnoses including alcohol abuse, falls, cerebrovascular accident with left sided hemiplegia, generalized muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hypertension, unsteadiness on feet, muscle wasting and atrophy, hyperlipidemia, cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Review of the resident's admit/readmit plan of care dated 12/21/23 revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility with a vascular wound to the left lower rear leg and left lower front leg. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's (#73) call light was in working order. This affected one ( Resident #73) of three residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 83. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #73 revealed an initial admission date of 07/21/23 with the latest readmission of 09/22/23 with the diagnoses including encephalopathy, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), decreased white blood cell count, generalized muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia, asthma and muscle wasting and atrophy. Review of the resident's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a severe cognitive deficit. On 02/07/24 at 4:12 P.M., observation of Resident #73's call light system revealed the emergency light was activated in the bathroom and the call light was not activated outside of the room. Further observation revealed the resident utilized a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the sit to stand lift was maintained in a sanitary manner for one resident (#33). This affected one ( Resident #33) of one resident who utilized the facility's sit to stand lift on the first floor. The facility census was 83. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an initial admission date of 09/21/23 with the latest readmission of 12/21/23 with the diagnoses including alcohol abuse, falls, cerebrovascular accident with left sided hemiplegia, generalized muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hypertension, unsteadiness on feet, muscle wasting and atrophy, hyperlipidemia, cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Review of the resident's plan of care dated 09/27/23 revealed the resident had a self-care deficit related to impaired balance. Interventions included the resident prefers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff wore personal protective equipment appropriately, doffed PPE appropriately, and cleaned/disinfected high touch surfaces that were potentially contaminated with COVID-19. This had the potential to affect all 84 residents in the facility. The facility also failed to ensure a glucometer was appropriately cleaned/disinfected between use with residents. This affected two (#28 and #46) out of seven residents who received glucose monitoring using the glucometer from the second floor medication cart. The census was 84. Findings include: 1. Observation of State Tested Nursing Aide (STNA) #93 on 12/03/23 at 9:03 A.M. revealed she was in Resident #15's room, who was under isolation precautions for COVID-19, and delivered a breakfast tray to Resident #15. When STNA #93 came out of the room and into the hallway, she still had her isolation gown, gloves, N95 respirator, and face shield on and another facility staff told her she needed to doff the Personal Protective…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate assistance with transfers to prevent falls. This affected one resident (#6) out of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 05/16/20 with diagnoses including cerebral palsy, spastic hemiplegia, dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, depression, and schizophrenia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 08/22/23, revealed Resident #6 had severely impaired cognition. Resident #6 had two or more falls without injury in the lookback period and required extensive assistance of two staff for transfers. Review of the plan of care, dated 02/13/23, revealed Resident #6 was at risk for falls and potential injury related to generalized weakness, decreased strength and endurance, impaired cognition, impaired mobility, poor safety awareness,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-20 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, self-reported incident review (SRI) , and review of facilities Inservice record, the facility failed to prevent the misappropriation of narcotic medication for Resident #50, #60, #70 and #80. This affected four residents (#50, #60, #70, and #80) of four residents reviewed for misappropriation of narcotic medication. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Review of facilities Misappropriation SRI (240769) revealed an investigation summary dated 11/01/23 to 11/08/23 that indicated Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #23 appeared to not log/sign in narcotic medication cards received from the pharmacy delivery on several dates from 10/06/23 to 10/29/23 on both first-floor medication carts on Sage and Lavender Halls. During the audit and investigation, it was found only Residents #50, #60, #70 and #80 had missing medication cards from when controlled substances were delivered on the Pharmacy Slip Proof of Delivery to them not being signed in on the Shift Change Substance Inventory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews, self-reported incident review (SRI) , and review of facilities Inservice record, the facility failed to maintain an accurate reconciliation of all controlled medications for their first floor Sage and Lavender Hall medication carts which resulted in misappropriation of narcotic medications. This affected four Residents (#50, #60, #70, and #80) out of four residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Review of facilities Misappropriation SRI (240769) revealed an investigation summary dated 11/01/23 to 11/08/23 that indicated Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #23 appeared to not log/sign in narcotic medication cards received from the pharmacy delivery on several dates from 10/06/23 to 10/29/23 on both first-floor medication carts on Sage and Lavender Halls. During the audit and investigation, it was found only Residents #50, #60, #70 and #80 had missing medication cards from when controlled substances were delivered on the Pharmacy Slip…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to notify a responsible representative of the misappropriation of narcotic medications per facility policy. This affected one resident (Resident #80) out of the four residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #80, revealed an admission date of 08/03/23. Diagnoses included: unspecified nondisplaced fracture of seventh cervical vertebra, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing and acute embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of lower extremity, bilateral. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 06 out of 15, indicating cognitive impairment. Review of the progress notes and assessments for Resident #80 completed on 11/01/23 to 11/03/23 revealed no documentation of notification of a responsible representative of the misappropriation and no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of Self Reported Incidents (SRI), interview, and policy review, the facility failed to implement their policy related to reporting allegations of abuse, protecting residents after an allegation of abuse was made, and completing a thorough investigation. This affected two residents (#57 and #84). The facility census was 80. Findings include: 1. Review of SRI (239532) submitted 09/24/23 at 12:33 P.M. revealed the Administrator was notified by State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #176 that Resident #84 alleged Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #166 pushed her in the chest while the resident was trying to come in the courtyard door from the smoking area around 8:30 P.M. on 9/23/23. Review of Resident #84's medical record revealed a 06/21/21 admission and she had a planned discharge 10/03/23. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was independent for daily decision making, required supervision for activities of daily living and had early Alzheimer's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Self-reported Incident (SRI) review, medical record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely report an allegation of abuse. This affected one resident (#84). The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of SRI (239532) submitted 09/24/23 at 12:33 P.M. revealed the Administrator was notified by State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #176 that Resident #84 alleged Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #166 pushed her in the chest while the resident was trying to come in the courtyard door from the smoking area around 8:30 P.M. on 9/23/23. Review of the SRI revealed management was not notified of the police being in the facility on an allegation of abuse. There was no evidence of the night shift staff on duty calling the manager on duty to report the alleged abuse. There was no evidence of night shift staff reporting to day shift staff the events of the previous evening/night involving a police response to the facility for an allegation of resident abuse. Review of the SRI…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of Self Reported Incidents (SRI), interview and policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of sexual abuse, and failed to prevent further potential abuse when a specified perpetrator was not removed from the facility timely. This affected two residents (#57 and #84). The facility census was 80. Findings include: 1. Review of SRI (239532) submitted 09/24/23 at 12:33 P.M. revealed the Administrator was notified by State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #176 that Resident #84 alleged Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #166 pushed her in the chest while the resident was trying to come in the courtyard door from the smoking area around 8:30 P.M. on 9/23/23. Review of the SRI revealed management was not notified of the police being in the facility on an allegation of abuse. There was no evidence of the night shift staff on duty calling the manager on duty to report the alleged abuse. There was no evidence of night shift staff reporting to day shift staff the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, policy review, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who required staff assistance with personal hygiene was provided nail care and showers. This affected one resident (#36) of three residents reviewed for bathing. The census was 80. Findings include: Review of Resident #36's medical record revealed a 05/27/21 admission with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, flaccid hemiplegia affecting left non dominant side, anemia, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, osteoarthritis, and muscle wasting. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was independent for daily decision making, and had verbal behaviors and other behaviors one to three days in the look back period. The resident required extensive assist of two for bed mobility, transfer, toilet use, and extensive assist of one for personal hygiene. The resident needed physical help in part of bathing and one person physical assist. He had upper extremity…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-10-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, resident interview, observations, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to meet resident needs. This had the potential to affect all 84 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility CMS-672 (census and condition information) form revealed the facility census as 84 residents. In the area of bathing, 61 residents required assistance of 1-2 staff members and 20 residents were completely dependent on staff for this task. 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #246 revealed an admission date of 09/24/22. Diagnoses included multiple fracture of the pelvis, cannabis use, fracture of the lumbar vertebra, fracture of a right rib, right kidney injury, schizophrenia, cerebral infarction, ventral hernia without obstruction, acute respiratory failure without hypoxia, and pedestrian on foot collision with automobile. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/01/22, revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-10-13 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — widespread
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure the time frames for addressing pharmacy recommendations contained time frames for completion. This had the potential to affect all 84 residents residing in the facility who received medications from the facility. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Regimen Reviews, not dated, revealed time frames for the physician to review pharmacy recommendations and time frames for the facility to implement the physicians changes were not included in the policy. Interview with Regional Director of Clinical Services #165 on 10/04/22 at 4:20 P.M. verified the facility policy for medication regimen reviews did not include time frames for the physician to review pharmacy recommendations or time frames for the facility to implement physician changes.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-13 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed in a timely manner as required. This affected six residents (Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #18, Resident #232, Resident #233, and Resident #243) of six residents reviewed for resident assessment. The facility census was 84 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/06/22 with diagnoses including anemia, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, muscle weakness and malignant neoplasm of prostate. Review of census data revealed Resident #2 discharged from the facility on 05/05/22. Review of a late entry nurses' note dated 05/05/22 at 5:51 P.M. revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the hospital following doctor's appointment. Review of Resident #2's MDS assessments revealed a discharge return not anticipated assessment dated [DATE] that was marked as in progress and was not completed. A red box was at the top that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, resident interview, observations, medical record review, facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were comprehensive. This affected six Residents (Residents #14, #51, #55, #66, #68, and #233) of 29 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed an admission date of 08/10/22. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, non-dominant, left side (L)hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction (CVA), hypertension (HTN), heart disease, and dysphagia. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/17/22, revealed the resident had intact cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 (no impairment) and no documented behaviors. The resident required limited to extensive assistance of one to two or more staff for all Activities of daily Living (ADL's). Review of physician orders for October 2022 revealed an order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure showers and nail care were completed for residents who were dependent upon staff for assistance. This affected six residents (Residents #13, #28, #52, #59, #68, and #235) out of the nine residents who were reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) during the annual survey. The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #68 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, ileus, hypertension, type two diabetes mellitus, dysphagia, schizophrenia, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/27/22, revealed this resident had moderately impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 04. This resident was assessed to be dependent upon one staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-13 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure activities were provided on weekends for cognitively impaired residents. This affected four residents (Residents #28, #36, #52, and #68) out of the four residents reviewed for activities during the annual survey. The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #68 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, ileus, hypertension, type two diabetes mellitus, dysphagia, schizophrenia, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/27/22, revealed this resident had moderately impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 04. This resident was assessed to require extensive assistance from one staff member for bed mobility and toileting, extensive assistance from two staff members for transfers,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, resident interview, observations, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #30 had a way to orient to time and date and failed to ensure Resident #237 was permitted to leave the facility as he wished. This affected two (#30 and #237) of five residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #237 revealed an admission date of 09/09/22. Diagnoses included acute embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of the right lower extremity, atherosclerotic heart disease, syncope and collapse, idiopathic gout, hypertension (HTN), arthritis, sickle-cell trait, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), alcohol dependence, tobacco use, hyperlipidemia, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), hematemesis, and nausea. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/22/22, revealed the resident had intact cognition with a Brief Interview of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, resident interview, observations, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #66's call light was within reach. This affected one (Resident #66) of three residents reviewed for call light access. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #66 revealed an initial admission date of 06/24/22 and a re-entry date of 07/08/22. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, lumbar vertebra fracture, low back pain, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, dysphagia, unsteadiness on her feet, encephalopathy. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/15/22, revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition with no Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score due to the resident being rarely or never understood. There were no documented behaviors. The resident required extensive to total assistance of one staff for all Activities of daily Living (ADL's) except eating which she required set up help and supervision. Review of the change in condition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-13 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to make choices about aspects of their life that are significant and to choose bathing schedules. This affected two of 25 sampled residents (#14 and #29). The facility census was 88. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 02/24/22 and diagnoses including diabetes and end stage renal disease. The resident went out of the facility for hemodialysis three times weekly (Monday, Wednesday, Friday, per physician's order). An annual Minimum Data Set assessment completed on 01/14/23 stated the resident had a brief interview for mental status score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The resident required extensive assistance from one staff for bathing. Interview with Resident #14 on 02/01/23 at 2:10 P.M. revealed she often missed showers because they were scheduled on her dialysis days. She stated she leaves around 6:00 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-13 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, observations, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to allow Resident #247 visitors. This affected one of five residents reviewed for dignity (Resident #247). The facility census was 84. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #247 revealed an admission date of 09/23/22. Diagnoses included enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile (C-diff) (bacterial infection of the intestines). Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/30/22, revealed the assessment was incomplete and the resident's cognition had not been assessed. Further review of the MDS revealed the resident was not on isolation/quarantine. The resident required extensive assistance of one to two staff for all Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) except eating which he required set up and supervision. Review of the plan of care dated 09/27/22 revealed the no care plan related to isolation or infectious disease. Review of physician orders for September 2022 identified an order for strict contact precautions. Further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified when a resident was out of ordered enteral feeding solution. This affected one resident (Resident #52) reviewed for tube feeding during the annual survey. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Record review for Resident #52 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance, hypotension, adult failure to thrive, hypovolemia, insomnia, and depression. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment, dated 08/17/22, revealed this resident had mildly impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 08. This resident was assessed to require extensive assistance from one staff member for bed mobility, to be dependent upon two staff members for transfers, and to be dependent upon one staff member for eating, toileting, and bathing. This resident was assessed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-13 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) of resident transfers/discharges as required. This affected one resident (Resident #18) of three residents reviewed for admission, discharge and transfer rights. The facility census was 84 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #18's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/07/22 and diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes, dysphagia, tracheostomy status and anemia. Review of Resident #18's census data revealed a discharge date of 07/28/22. Review of nurses' notes revealed on 07/28/22 at 9:27 A.M. Resident #18 continued to have emesis through his tracheostomy. Orders given to send Resident #18 to the emergency room for further monitoring. Family notified of new order. No evidence was provided regarding LTCO notification of Resident #18's discharge on [DATE]. Phone interview on 09/28/22 at 10:41 A.M. with Social Service…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-13 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure all of Resident #240's medications were available upon his discharge home. This affected one resident (Resident #240) of three residents reviewed for admission, discharge and transfer rights. The facility census was 84 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #240's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/06/22 and diagnoses including quadriplegia, type two diabetes, morbid obesity, colostomy and anemia. Review of Resident #240's admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #240 was cognitively intact, did not display behaviors and had an indwelling catheter and ostomy. Resident #240 did received antibiotics during the review period. Review of census data revealed Resident #240 was discharged from the facility on 09/26/22. Review of Resident #240's physician's orders revealed an order dated 09/09/22, for ertapenem sodium solution reconstituted one gram, use one gram intravenously (IV)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-13 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete comprehensive assessments within 14 calendar days after admission. This affected two of three residents (#9 and #73) reviewed for assessment completion. The facility census was 88. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 01/19/23. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed it was still in progress on 02/07/23. (14 days after admission would be 02/02/23). Interview with the Director of Nursing on 02/08/23 at 8:30 A.M. confirmed the comprehensive assessment for Resident #9 was not completed within 14 days after admission. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #73 revealed an admission date of 01/18/23. Review of the admission MDS assessment revealed it was completed on 02/06/23. (14 days after admission would be 02/01/23). Interview with the Director of Nursing on 02/08/23 at 8:30 A.M. confirmed the comprehensive assessment for Resident #73 was not completed within 14 days after admission.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-13 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure quarterly assessments were completed timely. This affected one of three residents (#67) reviewed for assessments. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #67 revealed an admission date of 10/05/22. An admission Minimum Data Set assessment was completed on 10/24/22. A quarterly assessment indicated it was in progress on 02/07/23 (was due to be completed 01/24/23). Interview with the Director of Nursing on 02/08/23 at 8:30 A.M. confirmed the quarterly assessment was not completed timely for Resident #67.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-13 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #17's Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed accurately. This affected one resident (#17) of two residents reviewed for PASARR's. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed they were admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, lymphedema, hyperlipidemia, cognitive communication deficit, and bipolar disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #17 had intact cognition and required the extensive assistance of one person for personal hygiene. Review of the PASARR dated 02/18/22 revealed Resident #17 had a mood disorder, delusional disorder, panic or severe anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and paranoid disorder. Review of the psychiatric note dated 07/08/22 revealed Resident #17 had a history of bipolar disorder and anxiety, there was no documentation related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-13 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, resident interview, observations, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #66 was provided the appliances needed for hearing adequately. This affected one (Resident #66) of one resident reviewed for communication sensory. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #66 revealed an initial admission date of 06/24/22 and a re-entry date of 07/08/22. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, lumbar vertebra fracture, low back pain, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, dysphagia, unsteadiness on her feet, encephalopathy, and severe protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/15/22, revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition with no Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score due to the resident being rarely or never understood. There were no documented behaviors. The resident required extensive to total assistance of one staff for all Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) except eating which she required set up and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-13 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide Resident #17 and Resident #49 with foot care and refer them to podiatry. This affected two residents (Residents #17 and #49) of nine residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. Interview on 09/26/22 at 4:00 P.M. with Resident #49 revealed he had asked to see the podiatrist since he admitted to the facility and had yet to see them. Observation on 10/03/22 at 1:20 P.M. of Resident #49's feet with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #100 revealed both feet had skin that was observed flaking off. The skin of his feet was dry and cracked, which worsened closer to his toes. His toenails were observed to be thick and yellow, with some black areas around the edges. Multiple toenails were long and extended past the end of his toe by up to about a half an inch. Interview with Resident #49 at that time revealed his feet were sensitive and the dry skin was uncomfortable at times. Resident #49…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to provide appropriate catheter care and monitoring. This affected one resident (Resident #240) of two residents reviewed for catheter care. The facility census was 84 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #240's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/06/22 and diagnoses including quadriplegia, type two diabetes, morbid obesity, colostomy and anemia. Review of Resident #240's admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #240 was cognitively intact, did not display behaviors and had an indwelling catheter and ostomy. Review of Resident #240's physician's orders revealed no orders pertaining to changing his suprapubic catheter or providing catheter care. Review of Resident #240's September 2022 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) revealed no evidence of suprapubic catheter care or catheter changes having been completed. Review of Resident #240's nurses' notes for September 2022 revealed no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, resident interview, observations, medical record review, facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure enteral feeding was provided as ordered for Residents #52, #232, and #243. This affected three residents (Residents #52, #232, and #243) of four residents who had a feeding tube. The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #232 revealed an admission date of 09/22/22 and a discharge date of 10/03/22. Diagnoses included displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the right femur, atrial fibrillation (a-fib), Diabetes Mellitus II (T2DM), emphysema, dysphagia, and severe protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/22/22, revealed the assessment remained in progress (23 days since the resident's re-entry to the facility). Further review of the MDS revealed the resident had impaired cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of five out of 15 (severe impairment).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete pre-dialysis and post-dialysis assessments for Resident #14 and Resident #30. This affected two residents (#14 and #30) of two residents reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #14 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus, hypertension, end stage renal disease with dependence on renal dialysis, cerebral infarction, cognitive communication deficit, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hypothyroidism, pain in left knee, and insomnia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 had intact cognition and received dialysis. Review of the plan of care dated 03/21/22 revealed Resident #14 received dialysis on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday related to End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). Interventions included assisting with transfers when going to dialysis and fluid restrictions as ordered. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-13 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure appropriate spacing between bed rails and mattresses was maintained and failed to ensure assessments for the use of bed rails were completed. This affected two residents (Residents #13 and #64) out of the two residents reviewed for use of bed rails during the annual survey. The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #64 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparalysis affecting the left non-dominant side, depression, and hypertension. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/26/22, revealed this resident had intact cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 15. This resident was assessed to require extensive assistance from one staff member for bed mobility and toileting and to be dependent upon two staff members for transfers.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were accurately reviewed by the physician, failed to ensure physician approved pharmacy recommendations were implemented, and failed to ensure medications were necessary. This affected three residents (#32, #51, and #59) out of the five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the annual survey. The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #32 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including anxiety disorder, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/06/22, revealed this resident had moderately impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 04. This resident was assessed to require extensive assistance from one staff member for bed mobility and toileting and to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #55's 'as needed' psychotropic medication did not exceed 14 days and was used with appropriate monitoring. This affected one resident (#55) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #55 revealed an admission date of 05/13/22 revealed an admission date of chronic diastolic heart failure, type two diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease stage two, depression, unspecified dementia, dysphagia, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #55 had severely impaired cognition. Review of the plan of care dated 05/13/22 revealed Resident #55 received a psychoactive medication. Interventions included giving medications as ordered, monitoring for effectiveness, observing and reporting any changes in mental status, and a resident specific behavior intervention. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from significant medication errors when medications ordered for treatment of cerebral infarction, anemia, kidney disease, hypertension were not given as ordered on days the resident went out for dialysis. This affected one of three residents (#14) reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 02/24/22 and a diagnosis of end stage renal disease. The resident had a physician's order for hemodialysis three times a week at an outside dialysis center. Review of physician's orders and medication administration records for January 2023 and February 2023 revealed orders for Aspirin daily at noon due to cerebral infarction, iron 325 milligrams daily at noon due to anemia, Lasix 80 milligrams daily at noon due to end stage kidney disease, miralax in the AM on Monday, Wednesday, Friday, and Sunday, and hydralazine, an antihypertensive medication at noon. Review of the medication administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, resident interview, observations, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to keep medications in locked containers and the facility failed to ensure prescription creams and ointments were not expired. This affected two residents (Resident #235 and #243). The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #235 revealed an initial admission date of [DATE] and a re-entry date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included type 2 Diabetes without complications, asthma, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, old myocardial infarction, hypothyroidism, primary pulmonary hypertension, personal history of immunosuppression therapy, rheumatoid arthritis, thoracic aortic aneurysm, unsteadiness on feet, difficulty walking, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia, cerebral infarction, and COVID-19. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, resident interview, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to failed to ensure resident medical records contained complete and accurate information. This affected four of 29 residents reviewed (Residents #14, #32, #237, and #246). The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #237 revealed an admission date of 09/09/22. Diagnoses included acute embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of the right lower extremity, atherosclerotic heart disease, syncope and collapse, idiopathic gout, hypertension (HTN), arthritis, sickle-cell trait, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), alcohol dependence, tobacco use, hyperlipidemia, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), hematemesis, and nausea. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/22/22, revealed the resident had intact cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 (no impairment).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-13 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure resident call lights were in good working order. This affected one resident (#68) out of the four residents reviewed for call lights during the annual survey. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Record review for Resident #68 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, ileus, hypertension, type two diabetes mellitus, dysphagia, schizophrenia, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/27/22, revealed this resident had moderately impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 04. This resident was assessed to require extensive assistance from one staff member for bed mobility and toileting, extensive assistance from two staff members for transfers, and supervision with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$366,645 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $196,064 — penalty dated 2026-04-21
  • $170,581 — penalty dated 2025-03-12
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-05-14 for 43 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-12 for 79 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GAHANNA OPERATOR HOLDCO, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/28/2022
ELAINE ROTHNER LEGACY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 07/28/2022
MOZART REALTY VENTURES LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST33%since 07/28/2022
MIRETZKY, STEVENIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/28/2022
ROTHNER, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/28/2022
WEISZ, MORDECHAIIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/28/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 19%Medicare 1%Other / private 80%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$279per resident / day
operating cost
$8,483per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$273per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366094. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next