Galion Meadows Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation
935 Rosewood Dr, Galion, OH 44833 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 62 certified beds · (419) 468-7544 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0603, F0606) — most recent May 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (71) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (66%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.2% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.3% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 0.4% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.1% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.7% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 0.0% | 6.1% | 16.1% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 31.2% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.8% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.6% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.5% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.3% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 61.9% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 31.1% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.5% | 12.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.75 | 1.73 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 4.31 | 1.80 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
51.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 55 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 51.9%CMS range 38.9–63.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.8%CMS range 7.3–16.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.7%CMS range 2.9–12.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.85 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 62 beds and averages 52.6 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.44 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.58 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 66% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
71 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 59 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, review of hospital records, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #10 was safely secured while in his electric wheelchair and failed to ensure his wheelchair was properly secured to the floor of the facility's transport van. Actual Harm occurred on 08/25/25 when, during transit, Resident #10's electric wheelchair tipped and moved forward. Resident #10 landed on the right side of his body while still in the wheelchair and hit his head on the transport van's floor. Resident #10 was admitted to the hospital for three days for treatment and monitoring before being discharged back to the facility. This affected one (Resident #10) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 54.Findings include:Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/5/21. Diagnoses included acute and chronic congestive heart failure, acute and chronic respiratory failure, diabetes mellites, cerebral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-08-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of the facility's Self-Reported Incident, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to safely transfer a resident. This resulted in Actual Harm to Resident #55 when State Tested Nursing Aide (STNA) #985 improperly transferred Resident #55 utilizing a 'bear hug' technique and the resident subsequently dislocated her right shoulder and had to be sent to the emergency room for evaluation and treatment. This affected one (Resident #55) of four residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 59. Findings Include: Review of Resident #55's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included spinal stenosis, difficulty in walking, abnormalities of gait and mobility, dementia, and osteoarthritis. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #55 had mild cognitive impairment, had no behaviors, and required extensive assist of two persons for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary kitchen environment, failed to ensure proper food storage and labeling, failed to ensure adequate hand hygiene during meal service, and failed to maintain clean equipment in the food preparation and service areas. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 55.Findings include: Observation and interview during the initial kitchen tour on 05/17/26 between 8:19 A.M. and 8:44 A.M. revealed multiple cleanliness concerns. A black substance was present under the sink. Vents above the stove and food preparation areas had loose dust with additional dust collected on the ceiling light fixture. Dust was hanging around the sprinkler head above the food preparation area. The vent by the refrigerator and freezer was heavily coated in dust. A fan with a large amount of dust on the back was blowing directly onto clean dishes. These findings were confirmed at the time of observation with Dietary Aide #232 and Dietary Manager #284 at 8:45 A.M. Observation and interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, review of the infection control and surveillance plan, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection surveillance. This had the potential to affect all residents. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn during care for a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). This affected one resident (#9) of one resident reviewed for EBP. The facility identified 12 residents on EBP. The facility census was 55.Findings Include: 1. Review of the infection surveillance and control sheets for 01/2026 through 03/2026 revealed the facility did not track each infections bacteria when indicated. Further review of the infection surveillance and control sheets revealed there was no surveillance for the month of 04/2026. Interview on 05/26/26 at 8:32 A.M. with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #263, also the infection control nurse, confirmed the facility was not tracking the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-26 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — patternPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring for psychotropic medication effectiveness and adverse effects. This affected five (#5, #8, #17, #31, and #59) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility identified 43 residents receiving psychotropic medications. The facility census was 55. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 03/30/26. Diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, atrial fibrillation, altered mental status, and cerebral infarction. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition. Review of the plan of care initiated 03/31/26 and last revised 04/16/26 revealed to monitor and report for adverse effects of antidepressant medication, antianxiety medication and antipsychotic medications. Review of the physician orders dated 03/30/26 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident medical records were accurate and complete. This affected six (#3, #9, #18, #26, #43, and #49) of 22 sampled residents reviewed for accuracy of the medical record. The facility census was 55. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 05/27/25. Diagnoses included chronic pancreatitis, gastrostomy status, type two diabetes mellitus, and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition. Review of the care plan for hospice care last revised 12/25/25 revealed for the facility to collaborate with the hospice team to ensure the resident's spiritual, emotional, intellectual, physical, and social needs were met. Review of the physician orders dated 12/25/25 revealed the resident was admitted to hospice services. Review of the resident's hospice documentation revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure advance directives were consistent throughout the medical record. This affected three (#17, #38, #59) of four residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility census was 55. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 02/14/26. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizoaffective disorder, anorexia nervosa, anxiety, and hypertension. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition.eview of a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) Comfort Care (CC) form dated 02/12/26 revealed the resident had chosen a DNRCC-Arrest (DNRCC-A) code status (all measures of care provided until the point of cardiac or respiratory arrest.) Review of the care plan initiated 02/15/26 and last revised on 02/25/26 revealed the resident code status was a Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care - Arrest DNRCC-A.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-26 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolatedProtect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure proper assessment and notification to the physician after moving a resident to the secured memory care unit. This affected one (#59) of three residents reviewed for dementia care. The facility census was 55.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #59 revealed an admission on [DATE]. Diagnoses included depression, anxiety, and epilepsy.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #59 had cognitive impairment. The resident was assessed to require setup or cleanup assistance for eating and partial to moderate assistance for oral hygiene, toileting, showering, upper and lower body dressing, putting on and taking off footwear.Review of the care plan dated 05/21/26 revealed Resident #59 resided on the secured memory care unit for a therapeutic environment related to dementia and had exit seeking behavior. Interventions included to encourage the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-26 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based in record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure a bed hold notice and a notice of transfer were given to resident or the resident representative upon discharge to the hospital. This affected one (#56) of one resident reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 55. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #56 revealed an admission date of 04/10/26 and a discharge date of 04/22/26. Diagnoses included sepsis due to unspecified organism, cystitis without hematuria, morbid obesity due to excess calories, type II diabetes mellitus with ketoacidosis without coma, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, and generalized muscle weakness.Review of nursing documentation dated 04/22/26 at 11:30 A.M. revealed the resident experienced a significant change in condition and was found unresponsive with a snoring sound and no verbal response. Further review revealed emergency medical services were called, oxygen therapy was initiated, and the resident was transferred to the hospital. Review of electronic medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-26 · tag F0646 — isolatedNotify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the state mental health authority for Resident #03 when he was readmitted to the facility with new diagnosis of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia and sepsis after a hospitalization following an incident in which he ingested his own feces and for Resident #16 after a significant change in condition which resulted in a new diagnosed mental health condition. This affected two residents (#03 and #16) of two residents reviewed for preadmission screening and resident review (PASRR). The facility census was 55.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #03 revealed an original admission date of 07/17/2019 with a discharge to a local hospital on [DATE] and readmission of 12/09/25. Pertinent diagnoses included paraplegia, type II diabetes mellitus, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type; cognitive communication deficit, major depressive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), generalized anxiety disorder,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to timely assess, monitor, and treat a change in skin condition. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure a skin wound treatment was completed per physician orders. This affected two (#18, #42) of two residents reviewed for non-pressure related skin conditions. The facility census was 55.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 12/04/20. Diagnoses included dementia, Alzheimer's disease, anxiety, peripheral vascular disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and depressive disorder. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The resident was dependent on staff for activities of daily living. Review of the care plan revised 04/17/25 for the resident's impaired cognitive function revealed the resident had dementia with behaviors and was physically and verbally…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer wound treatments were completed per physician orders. This affected one (#49) of one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility identified four residents with pressure ulcers. The facility census was 55. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #49 revealed an admission date of 11/03/25. Diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of the brain, cerebrovascular disease, depression, and a stage three pressure ulcer of the right ankle.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident was at risk for skin breakdown.Review of the care plan dated 04/15/26 revealed the resident had a pressure area to the right lateral lower leg. Interventions included pressure reducing boots to bilateral feet as tolerated, elevate heels, low air loss mattress, and assist with turning and repositioning as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 59 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were was free from accident hazards. This affected one (#31) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 55. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 01/27/26. Diagnoses included pulmonary embolism, emphysema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and asthma.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 revealing the resident had intact cognition. Additionally, the resident was dependent for bed mobility, transfers, and activities of daily living.Review of the fall risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was at high risk for falls.Review of the plan of care dated 05/15/26 revealed the resident was at risk for falls due to generalized weakness, history of falls, decreased strength and endurance, and need for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure interventions were implemented for significant weight loss, failed to monitor fluid restrictions, and failed to provide nutritional supplements per physician orders. This affected three (#1, #38, #27) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility identified three residents with significant weight loss, two residents with fluid restrictions, and five residents receiving nutritional supplements. The facility census was 55. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 04/27/26. Diagnoses included trigeminal neuralgia, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, pneumonitis, and pleural effusion.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident was independent with eating meals. Review of hospital documentation dated 04/24/26 revealed Resident #1 weighed 130 pounds prior to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-26 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure placement of a gastrostomy tube prior to administering a gastrostomy tube flush. This affected one (#9) of one resident reviewed for tube feeding. The facility identified one resident with a feeding tube. The facility census was 55. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 05/27/25. Diagnoses included chronic pancreatitis, gastrostomy status, type two diabetes mellitus, and hypertension.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition.Review of the care plan initiated 08/18/25 and revised on 05/01/26 revealed the resident had a gastrostomy feeding tube with interventions to provide enteral nutrition per physician orders, flush feeding tube per physician orders, and check for tube placement and residual as indicated. Review of a physician order dated 05/28/25 revealed to check tube…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary respiratory care and services to meet their needs. This affected one (#29) out of two residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 55.Findings include:Review of the medical record for the Resident #29 revealed an admission date of 09/24/24. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, chronic atrial fibrillation, and chronic combined systolic and diastolic heart failure.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating the resident had intact cognition. Additionally, the resident experienced shortness of breath with exertion, at rest, and while lying flat.Review of the plan of care dated 01/05/25 and revised 04/27/25 revealed the resident had impaired respiratory status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-26 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication with the dialysis services provider. This affected one (#27) of one resident reviewed for dialysis services. The facility identified two residents as receiving dialysis services. The facility census was 55. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 01/10/25. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, end stage renal failure, chronic kidney disease, vascular dementia, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of the care plan dated 02/07/25 revealed the resident had end stage renal disease and was receiving dialysis services. An intervention dated 02/27/26 revealed for staff to coordinate resident's care in collaboration with the dialysis center.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-26 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) received necessary care and services to meet the resident's psychosocial needs. This affected two (#31 and #03) of two residents reviewed for trauma informed care. The facility census was 55.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 01/27/26. Diagnoses included pulmonary embolism without acute cor pulmonale, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating the resident had intact cognition and that the resident had a diagnoses that included post-traumatic stress disorder. Review of the plan of care dated 03/19/26 and revised 05/18/26 revealed the resident had an impaired psychiatric and mood status related to anxiety, bipolar disorder, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-26 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, review of hospital records and policy review, the facility failed to facilitate guardianship and appropriate behavioral health services to meet the complex psychosocial needs of a resident with schizoaffective disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, anxiety, and an intellectual disability, which resulted in Resident #03 continuing with behaviors that were detrimental to his psychosocial and physical well-being. This affected one resident (#03) of two residents reviewed for behaviors. The facility census was 55. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #03 revealed an original admission date of 07/17/19 with a discharge to a local hospital on [DATE] and readmission of 12/09/25. Pertinent diagnoses included: Paraplegia, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type; cognitive communication deficit, major depressive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), generalized anxiety disorder, unspecified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per physician orders resulting in a medication error rate exceeding five percent. 26 opportunities were observed with three medication errors, resulting in a medication error rate of 11 percent. This affected two (#27 and #52) of six residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 55. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #52 revealed an admission date of 11/04/24. Diagnoses included paranoid schizophrenia, vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance, bipolar disorder, dysphagia, anxiety, and hypertension.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of a physician order dated 11/04/25 revealed an order for Robitussin Cough plus Chest Congestion DM (dextromethorphan) oral liquid 20 milligrams (mg)/200 mg per 20 milliliters (ml), give 10 ml…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-26 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a mechanical soft diet was provided per physician orders. This affected one resident (#38) of two residents reviewed for food. The facility census was 55. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 02/14/26. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizoaffective disorder, anorexia nervosa, anxiety, and hypertension.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition.Review of the care plan dated 02/20/26 and last revised 05/13/26 revealed the resident was at risk for altered nutritional status due to significant weight loss and a mechanically altered diet. One intervention noted providing meals/snacks/fluids based on resident food preferences and physician orders.Review of a physician order dated 03/02/26 revealed the resident was ordered a regular diet with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-26 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received the coronavirus (Covid-19) vaccination upon consent. This affected one (#22) of five residents reviewed for vaccinations. The facility census was 55.Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic bronchitis, and peripheral vascular disease (PVD). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 had impaired cognition. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #22 was not up to date on the Covid-19 vaccination. Review of the care plan dated 06/25/25 revealed Resident #22 had impaired respiratory status related to COPD, and pulmonary disease. Interventions included labs and diagnostics testing as ordered, and treatments as ordered by physician. Review of the Vaccine Informed Consent Form dated 10/31/25 revealed the facility offered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident, family, and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a pleasant homelike environment free of frequent strong foul odors of urine on the North and South units of the facility and failed to ensure the resident's wheelchairs were clean. This had the potential to affect 38 residents residing on the North and South units and affected three (Residents #25, #40, and #43) of four residents whose wheelchairs were observed for cleanliness. The facility census was 51.Findings include: 1. Observation and interview on 12/08/25 at 2:48 P.M. revealed a strong foul odor of urine upon entering the facility. Tour of the facility confirmed the strong odor was throughout the North and South resident living areas. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the odor. Observations and interviews on 12/08/25 at 3:00 P.M. with Resident #17, at 3:06 P.M. with Resident #24, at 3:24 P.M. with Resident's husband revealed the hallways had a strong foul odor of urine. Observations and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, review of manufacturer instructions, review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, and review of the facility policies, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices while administering medications to the residents, completing hand hygiene when providing care to the residents, donning proper personal protective equipment (PPE) and completing proper hand hygiene for residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for indwelling devices, and disinfecting a glucometer between use for Residents #4 and #5. This affected six residents (#4, #5, #34, #37, #40, and #47) observed for infection control. The facility census was 51.Findings include:1. Observation of medication administration and staff interview on 12/09/25 at 10:28 A.M. revealed after Registered Nurse (RN) #221 exited Resident #34's room, RN #221 did not wash his hands or use hand sanitizer. RN #221 returned to the medication cart and prepared Resident #40's insulin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident representative interview, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to inform a resident's resident representative of a incident involving the resident. This affected one (Resident #37) of three residents reviewed for being informed of health condition. The facility census was 51.Findings include:Record review for Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 11/05/21. Diagnosis included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side and cognitive communication deficit.Review of the significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #37 was severely cognitively impaired. The medical record revealed Resident #37's son was the responsible party and Emergency Contact #1.The progress note dated 12/03/25 (Wednesday) completed by Director of Nursing (DON) revealed a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) reported to nurse Resident #37 had a skin tear on top of right foot. Upon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to obtain urine outputs as physician ordered for a resident and failed to ensure a resident's new areas of skin breakdown were timely assessed and treated. This affected one (Resident #37) of three residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility census was 51.Findings include:Record review for Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 11/05/21. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness, and lack of coordination.Review of the significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #37 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #37 had impairment on one side to the upper and lower extremities, was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, bed mobility, frequently incontinent bowel and bladder, and had no skin ulcer/injury treatments. a. Review of the physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was safely transferred using a mechanical lift (Hoyer). This affected one (Resident #37) of two residents reviewed for transfers. The facility census was 51.Findings include:Record review for Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 11/05/21. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, morbid, severe obesity, cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, and need for assistance with personal care.Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #37 was severely cognitively impaired, had impairment on one side to the upper and lower extremities, and was dependent on staff for bed mobility. Review of the care plan dated 12/03/24 revealed Resident #37 had an activity of daily living self-care performance deficit related to impaired mobility, shortness of breath, hemiplegia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, review of the facility policy, and review of the insulin pen guidance, the facility failed to ensure their medication error rate did not exceed five percent (%). Two errors occurred within 27 opportunities for an error rate of 7.4%. This affected one (Resident #40) of five residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 51.Findings include:Record review for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 09/13/19. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus (DM).Review of the care plan dated 04/27/25 revealed Resident #40 had an impaired metabolic status related to DM. Interventions included to administer medications as indicated by physician orders.Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #40 was severely cognitively impaired, had a diagnosis of DM and received daily injections.Review of the physician orders for December 2025 for Resident #40 included orders for Basaglar Kwikpen subcutaneous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, review of the facility policy, and review of the insulin pen guidance, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from significant medication errors when nursing failed to prime insulin pens prior to insulin administration. This affected one (Resident #40) of five residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 51.Findings include: Record review for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 09/13/19. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus (DM).Review of the care plan dated 04/27/25 revealed Resident #40 had an impaired metabolic status related to DM. Interventions included to administer medications as indicated by physician orders.Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #40 was severely cognitively impaired, had a diagnosis of DM and received daily injections.Review of the physician orders for December 2025 for Resident #40 included orders for Basaglar Kwikpen subcutaneous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely complete nutritional assessments and requests to obtain resident weights to monitor and provide intervention for continued weight increases. This affected one (#28) of three residents reviewed for nutrition and weights. The census was 48.Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, unspecified convulsions, hypothyroidism, morbid obesity, type II diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dysphagia, muscle weakness, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #28's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact.Review of Resident #28's weights, dated April 2025 to October 2025, revealed on 04/01/25 the resident weighed 286.6 pounds and on 05/01/25 the resident weighed 302.6 pounds, which represented a 5.6 percent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to obtain ordered medications to administer to residents. This affected one (#28) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 48.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #28 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease, unspecified convulsions, morbid obesity, type II diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and lymphedema.Review of a plan of care dated 03/24/25 revealed Resident #28 had the potential for pain. Interventions included to administer medications per physician orders, encourage the resident to request pain medication before the pain becomes too intense, and to monitor for changes in usual activities.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #28 was cognitively intact and did not receive opioid medication.Review of a nursing progress note dated 10/09/25 at 4:40 P.M.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #44 ' s guardian was informed about the potential charges for therapy and the beginning of services, which affected one (#44) of three residents reviewed for therapy, and the facility failed to ensure informed consent was obtained prior to initiating dental services for Resident #44. This affected one resident (#44) of three residents reviewed for ancillary services. The facility census was 51. Findings Include:1.) Review of the Resident #44's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/09/17 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, dysphagia, dementia, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, anxiety, depression, heart failure, adult antisocial behavior, adult failure to thrive, and liver disease.Review of Resident #44's guardianship paper dated 10/06/22 revealed his daughter was the court appointed guardian.Review of Resident #44's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was rarely or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, family interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to complete physician ordered laboratory work required prior to an appointment for Resident #17, resulting in the appointment needing to be rescheduled. The facility failed to complete neurological assessments for Resident #1, after a fall with a head injury. This affected two (#1 and #17) of three residents reviewed for quality of care and treatment. The facility census was 51.Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic heart failure.Review of Resident #17's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition.Review of Resident #17's progress note dated [DATE] revealed she returned from a nephrology appointment with a follow up appointment to take place on [DATE]. The physician requested laboratory test be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-16 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure parameters for Resident #1's midodrine (to treat low blood pressure) were entered correctly into the medical record and midodrine was administered according to the parameters ordered. This affected one (#1) of three residents reviewed for medications being administered correctly. The facility census was 51.Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] and expired on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses that included but not limited to Alzheimer's disease, neuromuscular dysfunction, dysphagia, type 2 diabetes. schizoaffective disorder/bipolar type, and depressive disorder. Review of the modification of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of physician orders revealed on [DATE] Resident #1 was ordered midodrine five milligram (mg) three times a day for hypotension. Midodrine was to be held for systolic blood pressure (SBP)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-16 · tag F0772 — isolatedHave an agreement with an approved laboratory to obtain services, if on-site laboratory services aren't provided.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, family interview, and staff interview, the faciltiy failed to obtain physician ordered laboratory tests for one resident. This affected one (#17) of three residents reviewed for physician orders. the faciltiy census was 51. Findings include:Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/15/25 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic heart failure. Review of Resident #17's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. Review of Resident #17's progress note dated 01/20/25 revealed she returned from a nephrology appointment with a follow up appointment to take place on 07/20/25. The physician requested laboratory tests be drawn on 07/14/25 prior to the appointment. Review of Resident #17's physician order dated 01/20/25 revealed on 07/14/25 laboratory test were to be completed. The laboratory test included a complete blood count…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and review of wound care policy, the facility failed to follow the appropriate infection control guidelines when changing dressing for Resident #28's wound. This affected one (#28) of two residents observed for infection control practices. The facility census was 51.Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #28 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #28 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of a wound evaluation note dated 09/08/25 at 2:01 P.M. revealed Resident #28 had a skin tear to the right lower leg. The skin tear measured 2.5 centimeters (cm) long and 0.8 cm wide and was 0.1 cm deep. Review of the new order, received on 09/11/25 ,to cleanse the skin tear to Resident #28's right lower leg with normal saline or wound cleanser, apply Vitamin A and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and review of manufacturer guidelines, the facility failed to ensure the dishwasher reach the minimum temperature to sanitize dishware properly. This had the potential to affect all residents who receive food from the kitchen. The facility identified only one resident who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Observation on 12/02/24 at 9:30 A.M. of dishwasher revealed the dishwasher as model ES 2400. Wash temperature was observed to be 110 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and rinse cycle of 130 degrees F. Interview with Dietary Aide #200 verified the wash cycle was only 110 degrees F. Dietary Aide #200 stated she believed it should be at 120 degrees F. Review of the facility's Dish Machine log for November 2024 revealed there were no temperatures documented from 11/13/24 through 11/17/24 for breakfast and lunch. No documentation for 11/19/24 and 11/22/24 for any meal. All other documentation revealed temperatures of 120 degrees F. Review of the dishwasher guidelines revealed the minimum wash…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living care (ADL) for dependent residents who required assistance from staff with bathing/showers. This affected three of three residents (#38, #41, and #52) reviewed for showers. The facility identified all residents required assistance with showers and bathes. The facility census was 42. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/24/24. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, morbid obesity, femur fracture, and acute respiratory failure. Review of Resident #38's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was cognitively intact and required substantial/maximum assistance from staff for showers and bathing. Review of Resident #38's care plan revealed she was dependent on staff for bathing and would be clean, dry, and odor free, and appropriately groomed through next review period. Interventions included to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to implement their infection control policies ensuring staff wore the proper personal protective equipment (PPE) and have PPE readily available outside the residents' rooms. This affected one (#22) of two residents reviewed for contact precautions, This had the potential to affect all 52 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 52. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed and admission date of 08/15/24, with diagnoses including hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, hemiplegia, and COVID-19 acute respiratory disease. Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed Resident #22 tested positive for COVID on 08/24/24. A progress note dated 08/25/24 revealed Resident #22 is droplet precautions/isolation due to testing positive for COVID. Review of the Care plan for Resident #22 revealed maintain droplet/contact isolation precautions and personal protective equipment as indicated on 08/24/24. Review of Resident #22's Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-18 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week as required. This had the potential to affect all 50 residents residing in the facility. Facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of the posted nursing staff information and staff schedule revealed on 06/15/24 and 06/16/24 there was no RN present or working in the facility. Review of pay schedules/time sheets for 06/15/24 and 06/16/24 revealed there was no RN that clocked in for work on 06/15/24 and 06/16/24. Interview with the Administrator on 06/18/24 at 11:07 A.M. confirmed there was no RN who worked on 06/15/24 or 06/16/24. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 06/18/24 at 12:49 PM confirmed there was no RN scheduled to work on 06/15/24 and 06/16/24. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00154558.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — widespreadProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of activities calendars, review of resident council minutes, review of activities director job description, review of policy, family member interview, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a variety of ongoing resident centered activities were offered over various times throughout the day and staff were available to implement the scheduled activities. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all 54 residents in the facility. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Review of the February 2024 Activity Calendar revealed four to five events were scheduled for each weekday of the month other than two Valentines day parties on 02/14/24. Review of the February Activity Staffing schedule revealed two activity time slots for each weekday. Activity staff were missing for the 2:00 P.M., afternoon activity on 02/14/24, 02/20/24, 02/21/24, 02/28/24, and 02/29/24. The days of 02/19/24, 02/26/24, and 02/27/24 did not show staff coverage for any activity on each day. Review of the Elder Council Meeting Minutes dated 02/23/24 revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interviews, review of cleaning procedure log and review of cleaning schedule, the facility failed to ensure that the kitchen ice machine is kept clean. The deficient practice had the potential to affect 53 residents who receive ice from the machine, excluding Resident #7 (who receives nothing by mouth). The facility census was 54. Findings include: Observation on 03/10/24 at 8:40 A.M., revealed a large amount of a wet black substance inside the ice machine on the top panel. This wet black substance was directly above the ice in the machine. Interview on 03/10/24 at 8:42 A.M., with Dietary Director #336 confirmed the presence of the black substance inside the ice machine. Dietary Director #336 revealed that maintenance cleans the ice machine every one and a half to two months and that the ice is taken out of the machine prior to being cleaned. Interview on 03/10/24 at 11:38 A.M., with Plant Director #259 revealed he just cleaned the ice machine. Plant Director #259 revealed the ice machine is cleaned quarterly and he did not take the ice out when he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-20 · tag F0712 — patternEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure physician visits were completed as required. This affected 10 (#01, #08, #15, #16, #19, #24, #34, #39, #41, and #46) of 10 residents reviewed for physician visits. The facility census was 54. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #01 revealed an admission date of 07/24/10. Medical diagnoses included traumatic brain injury, depression, cognitive communication deficit, and chronic pain. Review of the medical record for Resident #01 revealed he was seen by Medical Director (MD) #600 on 06/19/23. Resident #01 was seen by Nurse Practitioner (NP) #625 on 02/20/24. There were no other documented physician visits for Resident #01. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #08 revealed an admission date of 08/03/23. Medical diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, anemia, and unspecified psychosis. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #08 was seen by MD #600 on 08/04/23 and again on 01/03/24. Resident #08 was seen by NP #625 on 02/29/24. There were no other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-20 · tag F0847 — patternInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided clear communication on what an arbitration agreement proposes and how to accept or decline the arbitration agreement. This affected four (#46, #203, #201, and #302) of four residents reviewed for binding arbitration. The facility census was 54. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 12/14/23. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, spondylosis, acute kidney failure, dysphagia, depression, and dementia. Review of the arbitration agreement for Resident #46 revealed that it was unsigned and the column next to Signer refused to sign the arbitration Agreement says no. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #201 revealed an admission date of 07/21/23. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including hydrocephalus, urinary tract infection, hypokalemia, anxiety disorder, depression, insomnia, and mild intellectual disabilities. Review of the arbitration agreement for Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in a manner that a reasonable person would consider dignified. This affected two residents (#07 and #32) of five residents reviewed for medication administration and 19 residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 54. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #07 revealed an admission date of 03/09/17. Medical diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, cerebrovascular accident (stroke), dementia, adult failure to thrive, and malnutrition. The record identified Resident #07 was to have no food or medications by mouth and was dependent on his percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube for all nutritional intake and medication administration. Resident #07 was a resident on the secured memory care unit. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 quarterly assessment, dated 02/28/24, revealed the resident was rarely/never understood. He was dependent on activities of daily living and mobility, and received greater than 51% of his daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's choice for showers was honored. This affected one (#22) of two residents reviewed for choices. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #22 had an admission date of 02/14/24. Diagnoses included osteomyelitis, type two diabetes mellitus, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident required partial/moderate assistance with bathing and showers. Review of the shower schedule revealed Resident #22 was scheduled for showers on second shift on Wednesdays and Sundays. Review of the care plan for activities of daily living revealed the resident requested showers on Wednesdays and Sundays. Review of shower documentation revealed the resident had not received a shower on 03/10/24 (Sunday) or 03/13/24 (Wednesday). Interview on 03/11/24 at 8:30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, family interview, record review, and review of facility incident reports, the facility failed to ensure a resident's responsible party was notified of a fall and subsequent transfer to the emergency department. This affected one (#46) of two residents reviewed for notification of change in condition. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 12/14/23. Medical diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, dementia, and depression. Review of Resident #46's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 5-day assessment, dated 02/26/24, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 08, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The resident had no recorded hallucinations or delusions, and was noted to have wandered during one to three days during the 7-day look-back period. The resident required substantial/maximum assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) and required partial/moderate assistance with transfers and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was accurately completed. This affected one (#8) of one resident reviewed for PASRR. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #8 had an admission date of 08/03/24. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, morbid obesity, cellulitis, hypertension, chronic pain syndrome, unspecified psychosis, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of a PASRR results dated 08/02/24 revealed the resident required a referral for a level two evaluation. Further review of the medical record revealed the facility never updated the resident's PASRR with accurate psychiatric diagnoses. Interview on 03/13/24 at 2:24 P.M., Social Worker (SW) #348 verified the resident had a diagnosis of mental health disorders when she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was included in quarterly care planning and invited to a quarterly care plan conference. This affected one (#41) of one resident reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #41 had an admission date of 10/10/23. Diagnoses included chronic systolic heart failure, type two diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of the progress notes revealed the resident's last care plan conference was on 10/25/23. Interview on 03/10/24 at 11:16 A.M., with Resident #41 revealed he had not been invited to care conference meeting recently. Interview on 03/12/24 at 11:10 A.M., with the Business Office Manager (BOM) #200 revealed the resident's last care conference was on 10/25/23. Interview on 03/12/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, family interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure treatment was provided to address a resident's bilateral lower extremity edema. This affected one (#15) of 19 residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 01/15/24. Medical diagnoses included dementia without behaviors, muscle weakness, hypertension and atrial fibrillation. Review of Resident #15's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 admission assessment, dated 01/25/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 05 indicating severely impaired cognition. The resident was not recorded to have any hallucinations or delusions, behaviors, or rejection of care. Review of Resident #15's care plan, initiated 02/07/24, revealed the resident was on diuretic therapy and had a risk for fluid volume imbalances. The care plan reflected a goal that the resident will be free from symptoms of fluid volume imbalances, with listed approaches including to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure incontinence care was completed timely. This affected one (#8) of one resident reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #8 had an admission date of 08/03/24. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, morbid obesity, cellulitis, hypertension, chronic pain syndrome, unspecified psychosis, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of an incontinence assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. The resident was not on a toileting program. Review of the care plan initiated 08/20/23 revealed the resident had episodes of incontinence and required assistance with toileting needs related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's pain was timely treated and physician ordered pain medications were available. This affected one (#24) of three residents reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 12/19/18. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pain in right shoulder, gluteal tendinitis right and left hip, trochanteric bursitis right and left hip, radiculopathy cervical region, and spinal stenosis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident received as needed pain medications and had frequent pain. Review of the care plan last revised 02/07/24 revealed the resident had chronic pain, muscle spasms in his shoulder, back, neck…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide an appropriate and timely response to a resident with suicidal ideation. This affected one (#8) of two residents reviewed for behavioral/emotional care. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #8 had an admission date of 08/03/24. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, morbid obesity, cellulitis, hypertension, chronic pain syndrome, unspecified psychosis, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of a nurse's note dated 12/29/23 at 1:21 P.M., revealed the nurse and nursing assistant provided a bed bath for the resident. During the bed bath the resident verbalized suicidal ideation to the staff. The nurse went to remove the call light that was near the resident's neck and the resident stated, just leave it there so I can go see Jesus faster and asked the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, consultant pharmacist interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from unnecessary psychotropic medication and failed to ensure behavior monitoring was implemented. This affected one (#46) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 12/14/23. Medical diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, dementia, and depression. Review of Resident #46's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 5-day assessment, dated 02/26/24, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 08, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The resident had no recorded hallucinations or delusions, and was noted to have wandered during one to three days during the 7-day look-back period. The resident required substantial/maximum assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, hospice staff interviews, physician interview, family interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the medical records were complete and accurate. This affected three (#46, #34, and #19) of 20 residents reviewed for accurate medical records. The facility census was 54. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 12/14/23. Medical diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, dementia, and depression. Review of Resident #46's interdisciplinary progress notes revealed a note dated 03/09/24 at 8:40 A.M., which stated the resident returned from the local emergency room. The note explained a bandage was intact to Resident #46's left forehead, and he had skin tears present to his right knee and left forearm. The note immediately prior to this progress note was dated 03/07/24. There was no mention of what incident or event led to Resident #46's emergency department visit on 03/09/24, or any recorded nursing action taken, in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, hospice staff interview and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to designate a member of the facility's interdisciplinary team to coordinate and communicate with the outside hospice provider and failed to ensure necessary hospice records were obtained by the facility and recorded in the resident's medical record. This affected one (#34) of one resident reviewed for hospice services. The facility identified 5 residents in the facility who received hospice services. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 04/05/21. Medical diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, psychotic disorder with delusions, depression, and anxiety. The medical record indicated that Resident #34 signed on with a local hospice provider on 05/25/23 with a terminal diagnosis of end stage dementia. Resident #34 had a code status of Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care (DNRCC) assigned to her profile in the electronic health record. Review of the hospice section of Resident #34's medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control practices were maintained during medication administration. This affected one (#32) of five residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 01/06/24. Medical diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, cerebral infarction, muscle weakness, morbid obesity, and depression. Observation on 03/12/24 from 10:36 A.M. to 10:42 A.M., revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #257 prepared 13 tablets or capsules for oral morning medications for Resident #32. While preparing the medications, RN #257 was observed to obtain the ordered medication card or medication bottle, and place each medication into his bare, ungloved hand prior to placing the medication into Resident #32's medication cup. During the medication preparation process, RN #257 was observed to be approached by the Administrator twice at 10:38 A.M. and 10:41…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored until the time of administration. This had the potential to affected 19 (#16, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24, #25, #26, #27, #28, #29, #30, #31, #32, #33, #34, and #35) of 19 residents who received medications from the North medication cart which was observed with pre-pulled medications in the cart. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Observation on 02/22/24 at 5:07 A.M. revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #30 was observed standing in front of the North hallway medication cart with a large stack of medication cups with multiple pills in each cup. The observation identified the cups had resident initials written on the cups. The observation identified there was at least five unidentified cups with resident's pills stacked on top of one another. RN #30 was observed in the process of popping resident pills into another cup. Interview with RN #30 at 5:10 A.M. confirmed she should not be pre-pulling resident medications into cups, and should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, facility self-reported incident (SRI) and investigation review, staff interview, facility policy review, and review of facility corrective action, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical and verbal abuse from staff. This affected one (#61) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 50. Findings include: Review of Resident #61's medical record identified admission to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including respiratory failure, urine retention, diabetes, congestive heart failure, anxiety, and depression. The resident was transferred to another facility on 02/20/24. Review of the facility admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #61 was assessed as cognitively intact. Review of an SRI dated 01/24/24 revealed State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #40 and STNA #50 witnessed Registered Nurse (RN) #20 screaming…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident, family member, and staff interview, review of facility self-reported incidents, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of physical abuse was reported to the State Survey Agency as required. This affected one (#43) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 52. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 08/03/23. Medical diagnoses included osteoarthritis, morbid obesity, muscle weakness, and a need for assistance with personal care. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #43 was assessed with intact cognition, and no evidence of hallucinations or delusions. Review of a progress note dated 11/06/23, written by Registered Nurse (RN) #150, revealed RN #150 entered Resident #43's room with a unnamed state tested nurse aide (STNA) as a witness and brought ordered bedtime medications to Resident #43. When RN #150 entered Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident, family member, and staff interview, review of facility self-reported incidents, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to investigate allegations of physical abuse in a timely manner. This affected one (#43) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 52. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 08/03/23. Medical diagnoses included osteoarthritis, morbid obesity, muscle weakness, and a need for assistance with personal care. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #43 was assessed with intact cognition, and no evidence of hallucinations or delusions. Review of a progress note dated 11/06/23, written by Registered Nurse (RN) #150, revealed RN #150 entered Resident #43's room with a unnamed state tested nurse aide (STNA) as a witness and brought ordered bedtime medications to Resident #43. When RN #150 entered Resident #43's room, Resident #43…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-15 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, family and resident interview, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to have an effective activities program for the residents. This affected six (#7, #31, #36, #41, #44 and #56) of 24 residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 24. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, depression, and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 was cognitively intact and had no behaviors. Resident #7 required limited assist from staff with bed mobility and extensive assist from staff with transfers. Review of the care plan conference summary documentation dated 07/08/22 revealed the activities Resident #7 participated in include crafts, music, and movies. Review of Resident #7's care plan dated 07/25/22 revealed the resident has the potential for isolation and needs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, staff interview, policy review, and review of the Center of Disease Control (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to provide care and services to reasonably prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2 virus (COVID-19), when staff did not appropriately use Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). This had the potential to affect 11 residents (#1, #7, #15, #31, #35, #43, #44, #45, #47, #52, and #53) who resided on the north hall and were not in isolation or quarantine for COVID-19. The facility also failed to appropriately handle soiled linen and clothing for one (Resident #49) of one resident reviewed for urinary tract infection. The facility census was 59. Findings include: 1. Observation of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #944 on 08/09/22 at 5:19 P.M. revealed LPN #944 had provided medication and cared for Resident #51, who was in quarantine due to close exposure to a COVID-19 positive resident and Resident #159 was in isolation due to positive for COVID-19. LPN #944 was observed to remove her gown and gloves, wash her hands and exit the room at 5:30 P.M. LPN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to allow a resident to decline laboratory testing. This affected one (Resident #55) of six residents reviewed for choices. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of Resident #55's medical record revealed an admission to the facility occurred on 07/09/21. Diagnoses included COVID-19, depression, anxiety, and high blood pressure. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #55 was cognitively intact. Review of a care conference form dated 05/06/22 revealed Resident #55's daughter had requested at that time that no further laboratory testing was completed. The record does not appear to have a physician's order until 07/20/22, for Resident #55's request. Review of Resident #55's physician orders dated 07/24/22 revealed no laboratory testing should be completed. Interview with Resident #55 on 08/11/22 at 8:43 A.M. confirmed she was currently COVID-19 positive. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, review of kitchen meal tickets, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide nutritional supplements to a resident with a history of significant weight loss. This affected one (Resident #56) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility identified three residents with significant weight loss. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of Resident #56's medical record revealed a re-admission to the facility occurred on 06/24/22. Diagnoses included fractured right collar bone, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, pneumonitis, sepsis, hyponatremia, dementia and diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident #56's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #56 required supervision for meals and had severe cognition issues. Review of a care conference meeting notes dated 06/29/22 revealed Resident #56's family had concerns Resident #56 not eating well. The meeting identified Resident #56 liked chocolate nutritional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident #41 did not have a significant medication error related to insulin administration when the facility held Resident #41's insulin without a physician order or physician notification. This affected one (Resident #41) of six residents reviewed for medication administration. Resident The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of Resident #41's medical record revealed an admission to the facility occurred on 11/19/21. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident #41's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #41 had severe cognitive issues. Review of the physician's orders dated August 2022 revealed Resident #41 had physician orders for Novolog insulin 10 units twice a day with lunch and supper. The order instruction revealed to notify the physician if Resident #41's blood sugar was over 400. The physician orders did not include any parameters to hold the insulin dose for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-15 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, review of kitchen meal tickets and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident with food allergies was implemented on the resident's meal ticket. This affected one (Resident #56) of three residents reviewed with food allergies. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of Resident #56's medical record revealed a re-admission to the facility occurred on 06/24/22. Diagnoses including hyponatremia, dementia and diabetes mellitus. The medical record revealed Resident #56 had food allergies to fish and shellfish, among many medication allergies. Review of Resident #56's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #56 required supervision for meals and has severe cognitive issues. Review of Resident #56's dietary progress note dated 07/06/22 revealed the note did not state if Resident #56 had a food allergy. Observations of the lunch meal services on 08/08/22 from 11:54 A.M. to 12:27 P.M., on 08/09/22 at 11:43 A.M.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-05-26 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — widespreadNot hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on personnel file review, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure newly hired employees were screened through the abuse registry upon hire to identify potential findings related to abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of property for seven of seven newly hired employees reviewed. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 55.Findings include:1. Review of the employee record for Administrator revealed a date of hire of 07/28/25. Further review revealed there was no abuse registry check completed upon hire.2. Review of the employee record for Director of Nursing (DON) revealed a date of hire of 12/23/25. Further review revealed there was no abuse registry check completed upon hire.3. Review of the employee record for Business Office Manager/Human Resources #500 revealed a date of hire of 11/12/25. Further review revealed there was no abuse registry check completed upon hire.4. Review of the employee record for Activities Director #248 revealed a date of hire of 05/19/25. Further review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-03-20 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to perform annual performance review for State Tested Nurse Aides (STNA). This affected three STNAs (#258, #207, and #204) reviewed for personnel records. This had the potential to affect all 54 residents. The facility census was 54. Findings include: 1. Review of STNA #258's personnel record revealed a hire date of 07/06/21. The personnel record contained no evidence of 90-day or annual performance reviews. 2. Review of STNA #207's personnel record revealed a hire date of 11/08/22. The personnel record contained no evidence of 90-day or annual performance reviews. 3. Review of STNA #204's personnel record revealed a hire date of 03/15/18. The personnel record contained no evidence of annual performance reviews. Interview on 03/19/24 at 12:51 P.M., with STNA #258 revealed she had never had a performance review since being employed at the facility. Interview on 03/19/24 at 1:33 P.M., with the Administrator revealed annual reviews were not documented. The Administrator stated he completed performance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-03-20 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure State Tested Nurse Aides (STNAs) completed the minimum required 12 hours of in-servicing a year. This affected one (STNA #258) of three STNAs reviewed for required in-services. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 54. Findings include: Review of STNA #258's personnel record revealed a hire date of 07/06/21. The record revealed STNA #258 only completed 5.10 hours of in-service training between 01/01/23 and 03/19/24. Interview on 03/19/24 at 1:35 P.M., with Registered Nurse (RN) #349 verified STNA #258 did not complete the required in-service training hours for the last year. Interview on 03/19/23 at 3:03 P.M., with the [NAME] President of Clinical Operations (VPCO) #700 verified the facility did not have a policy for staff education but that the staff members must meet the minimum requirements. For STNA staff, they must complete 12 hours of in-servicing annually.
- No harm found · B2022-08-15 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to inform residents who remained in the facility, of the cost of skilled services This affected two (Residents #14 and #600) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notification. The facility census was 59. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #14's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease and depression. Review of the resident's Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage revealed Resident #14's skilled services ended on 05/18/22. Review of the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNFABN) revealed Resident #14 was notified starting on 05/19/22 the inpatient stay at the facility costs for a semi-private room per day, or for a private room per day. No cost pricing was included for the skilled services the resident had been receiving. Interview with Business Office Manager #900 on 08/10/22 at 4:12 P.M. confirmed the SNFABN did not include the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-11-11 for 13 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $785K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365351. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.