No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Windsor Lane Healthcare Center

355 Windsor Lane, Gibsonburg, OH 43431 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 89 certified beds · (419) 637-2104 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0603) — most recent Dec 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS
Urgent care / clinic
365 Windsor Ln · (419) 637-2185 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
241 W Madison St · (419) 637-7441 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
104 W Madison St · (419) 637-2601 · Call to confirm hours
Park
204 S Gibson St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
OC0.3 mi
200 E Madison St · (419) 637-2159

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.3%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.4%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms20.8%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.2%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.5%6.1%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication37.3%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.3%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.2%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control30.8%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.8%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.121.731.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.791.801.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.30U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.051.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.47
RN hours/ resident / day
1.06
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.79
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.32
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.19
RN hoursweekends
39.8%
Total nursing turnover
37.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 89 beds and averages 69.6 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.32 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.79 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.45 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-07-25)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2021-11-24)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, review of a facility investigation including written statements, review of facility camera footage, hospital documentation review, review of a manufacture operating manual, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure specialized chairs were utilized in a safe and proper manner to prevent injuries. Actual Harm occurred when Resident #01 was placed in a Broda chair (a supportive positioning chair which allows residents to tilt and recline) equipped with caster type wheels and Resident #01 was left unattended while seated in the chair, which was not assessed for use, with the caster wheels unlocked. Resident #01 proceeded to lean forward and fell from the chair resulting in the resident sustaining serious injuries including a skin tear to the right forearm, a displaced fracture of the distal right femur, and a fracture through the proximal tibia metadiaphysis and fibular neck, subsequently requiring surgical repair. This deficient practice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, facility documentation, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure allegations of resident neglect were reported to the state agency. This affected two (#2, #3) of three residents reviewed for staff treatment and care. The facility census was 72. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 10/28/25. Diagnoses included, type II diabetes mellitus, epilepsy, dementia, major depression, cerebral infarction, parosmia, and hypertension. Review of the most current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 had severe cognitive impairment, exhibited no behaviors, was dependent for all activities of daily living including toileting, was frequently incontinent, and was at risk for pressure ulcer with no current skin breakdown. Review of the resident's progress notes from October 2025 through February 2026 lacked evidence regarding any alleged incidents.2. Review of the medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of facility documentation, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure allegations of resident neglect were promptly acted upon to prevent further neglect, and thoroughly investigated. This affected two (#2 and #3) of three residents reviewed for staff treatment and care. The facility census was 72. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 10/28/25. Diagnoses included, type II diabetes mellitus, epilepsy, dementia, major depression, cerebral infarction, parosmia, and hypertension. Review of the most current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 had severe cognitive impairment, exhibited no behaviors, was dependent for all activities of daily living including toileting, was frequently incontinent, and was at risk for pressure ulcer with no current skin breakdown. Review of the resident's progress notes from October 2025 through February 2026 lacked evidence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on resident interview, staff interview, review of facility self-reported incident (SRI), review of electronic medical record (EMR), and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from verbal abuse. This affected one resident (#30) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 70.' Findings Include: Review of the EMR for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 08/05/24, with diagnoses including type two diabetes, hypothyroidism, anxiety disorder, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension. Review of the most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating Resident #30 was cognitively intact. Resident #30 was dependent upon staff for toileting, showering/bathing, dressing, and transfers. Review of the facility SRI revealed that on 09/13/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure skin treatments were completed per physician order. This affected one (#48) of three residents reviewed for wound treatments. The facility census was 71.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission of 02/12/25. Diagnoses included morbid obesity, psoriasis vulgaris, seborrheic dermatitis, and Type I diabetes mellitus.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/09/25, revealed Resident #48 had intact cognition. Resident #48 required moderate assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of the care plan dated 03/03/23 revealed Resident #48 was at risk for chronic cellulitis. Interventions included to cleanse areas daily with soap and water and dry thoroughly. Further review of the care plan revealed Resident #48 had actual ADL self-care performance deficits and was at risk for incontinence secondary to impaired mobility, generalized weakness, and fatigue. Interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed ensure medications were properly stored. This affected one (#48) of three residents reviewed for medication storage. The facility census was 71.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 02/12/25. Diagnoses included morbid obesity, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and Type I diabetes mellitus. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/09/25, revealed Resident #48 had intact cognition. Resident #48 required moderate assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of the care plan dated 03/03/23 revealed Resident #48 had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), and a history of chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. Interventions included monitoring for difficulty with breathing and give aerosol medication as ordered.Review of the physician orders revealed Resident #48 had an order dated 02/17/24 for fluticasone propionate nasal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure accurate Treatment Administration Records (TARs). This affected one (#48) of three residents reviewed for accurate medical records. The facility census was 71.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission of 02/12/25. Diagnoses included morbid obesity, psoriasis vulgaris, seborrheic dermatitis, and Type I diabetes mellitus.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/09/25, revealed Resident #48 had intact cognition. Resident #48 required moderate assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of the care plan dated 03/03/23 revealed Resident #48 was at risk for chronic cellulitis. Interventions included to cleanse areas daily with soap and water and dry thoroughly. Further review of the care plan revealed Resident #48 had actual ADL self-care performance deficits and was at risk for incontinence secondary to impaired mobility, generalized weakness, and fatigue. Interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, staff interview, resident interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from physical abuse. This affected two residents (#2 and #3) of three reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 68. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/01/22. Diagnoses included morbid obesity, lymphedema, and chronic pain. Review of Resident #2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed intact cognition and the resident had no negative behaviors. Review of Resident #2's care plan revealed she was at risk for mood issues due to a diagnosis of depression and anxiety. Review of Resident #2's progress note dated 11/05/24 revealed an incident happened on 11/02/24 between approximately 12:30 P.M. to 1:30 P.M. The altercation was between two residents (#2 and #3) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's comprehensive care plan was completed and updated. This affected three (Resident #2 #12, and #25) of 17 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #12's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/07/23. Diagnoses included schizophrenia, psychosis, and congestive heart failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 was cognitively intact. He required a wheelchair in which he was independent on moving throughout the facility. Review of the Ohio Sex Offender Search revealed Resident #12 was a registered sex offender due to gross sexual imposition and sexual motivation. Review of Resident #12's most recent care plan revealed it was free from documentation regarding care and intervention of the sex offender. Interview on 07/25/24 at 8:05 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Resident #12's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident care plans were timely updated. This affected three (Residents #5, #10, and #46) of 17 residents reviewed for care plan. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #46's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/06/21. Diagnoses included morbid obesity and bariatric surgery on 05/23/24. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #46 had a high cognitive function. Review of the physician order dated 04/25/24 revealed Resident #46 had a order for high protein Slim Fast shakes or Ensure high protein nutrition shakes five times a day and a clear liquid diet. Review of Resident #46's care plan revealed he was at risk for non-compliance with his diet due to morbid obesity, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension. The care plan was absent of bariatric surgery nor requirement of a high protein diet. Interview with the Dietary Manager #237 on 07/23/24 at 4:32 P.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to assess and monitor the resident's skin conditions. This affected two (Residents #15 and #50) of two residents reviewed for skin conditions. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/14/24. Diagnoses included muscular dystrophies, congestive heart failure, morbid obesity, and cerebral vascular accident. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15's cognition was intact. The resident required substantial assistance to move from lying to sitting on the side of the bed. Review of Resident #15's most recent care plan revealed he was at risk for uncontrolled bleeding due to anticoagulant therapy and the potential for skin breakdown related to morbid obesity. Interventions included a weekly skin assessment and observation during care. Review of Resident #15's Weekly Skin Observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 31 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interview, observation, review of the medical record, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents wore smoking aprons as ordered by the physician. This affected one (#5) of two residents reviewed for smoking. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 12/10/22 with a diagnosis of chronic respiratory failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 had intact cognition. Review of a current physician order for 07/2024 revealed Resident #5 was required to wear a smoking apron while smoking, initiated on 03/23/23. Review of the most recent Smoking Assessment completed on 01/11/24 revealed Resident #5 no longer smoked. The assessment did not clarify whether Resident #5 could smoke independently. Review of a nursing progress note dated 05/01/24 revealed Resident #5 was reminded to wear a smoking apron when out smoking, Resident #5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received high protein nutritional supplementation per dietary's recommendations. This affected one (#16) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 08/03/19 with diagnoses of type II diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, and irritable bowel syndrome. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #16 had intact cognition. Review of the current and discontinued orders dated 07/01/24 through 07/24/24 revealed no current or discontinued order for a high-protein nutrition supplement. Review of a nursing progress note dated 07/12/24 revealed Resident #16 received new orders to start a 1,200 kilocalorie (kcal) partial liquid diet. Review of a dietary progress note written by Dietary Manager (DM) #237, dated 07/15/24, revealed DM #237 clarified Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the resident's nutritional and hydration needs were assessed and monitored after beginning on dialysis and collaborated with the hemodialysis center. This affected one (#10) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 11/08/17 with a diagnosis of kidney failure (05/27/24). Review of the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 05/31/24 revealed Resident #10 had moderately impaired cognition. Review of a nutrition progress note dated 05/23/24 revealed Resident #10 was hospitalized to establish dialysis. Review of a nutrition progress note dated 05/29/24 revealed Resident #10 was readmitted to the facility. RD #290 recommended a no concentrated sweets (NCS), no added salt diet (NAS) and thickened liquids to continue. RD #290 did not indicate in his note whether Resident #10 should continue to receive double protein portions. No additional assessment or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to timely provide a cancer medication to a resident who had a history of cancer. This affected one (#58) of six residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #58 revealed a readmission date of 07/11/24 with diagnoses of type II diabetes mellitus and obesity. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #58 had intact cognition. Review of the hospital paperwork dated 07/07/24, provided to the facility during Resident #58's referral for readmission, revealed Resident #58 had a past medical history of prostate cancer. Review of the fax transmission form dated 07/12/24 revealed a nurse identified as N. Nurse documented Resident #58 had a cancer medication at bedside and requested an order for the medication from the physician. Further review revealed the facility's Nurse Practitioner addressed the request 10 days later on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to timely arrange dental services for a resident. This affected one (#56) of three residents reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 61. Findings include Review of the medical record revealed Resident #56 had an admission date of 04/15/24. Diagnoses included morbid obesity with alveolar hypoventilation, atrial fibrillation, and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #56 had intact cognition. Review of the care plan initiated 04/27/23 revealed Resident #56 had dental problems related to poor oral hygiene. Interventions included to coordinate arrangements for dental care, transportation as needed/as ordered and provide mouth care as per the activities of daily living personal hygiene. Review of a dental note dated 06/28/24 revealed the resident needed extraction of two teeth and would need an oral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy, observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received diets as ordered and failed to provide diets as recommended by the registered dietitian. This affected three (#10, #17, and #26) of six residents reviewed for food. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 11/08/17 with a diagnosis of kidney failure. Review of the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 05/31/24 revealed Resident #10 had moderately impaired cognition. Review of a physician order dated 05/30/24 revealed Resident #10 received a no-added salt, no concentrated sweets diet with double protein, regular texture food with nectar thickened liquids. Observations in the kitchen on 07/23/24 beginning at 11:53 A.M. revealed [NAME] #227 plating meals. [NAME] #227 plated one scoop of spaghetti for residents who received standard portions. [NAME] #227 proceeded to plate Resident #10's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received thickened fluids as physician ordered. This affected one (#10) of six residents reviewed for food. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 11/08/17 with a diagnosis of kidney failure. Review of the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 05/31/24 revealed Resident #10 had moderately impaired cognition. Review of a physician order dated 05/30/24 revealed Resident #10 received a no-added salt, no concentrated sweets diet with double protein, regular texture foods and nectar thickened liquids. Observation on 07/23/24 at 8:39 A.M. revealed Resident #10 eating breakfast in his room. Resident #10 had a carton of milk with his breakfast. The milk appeared to be unthickened. Additionally, a pitcher of water was on Resident #10's tray table and the water appeared unthickened. Resident #10 provided a tray card from his garbage can dated 07/20/24 for a breakfast meal. Review of the tray…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, medical record review, contingency medication box medication list review, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure newly admitted residents had medications pulled from the contingency medication supply and administered the night of admission as ordered. This affected two (#11 and #67) of three residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 63. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed admission to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including morbid obesity, kidney failure, anxiety, and congestive heart failure (CHF). Review of Resident #11's hospital discharge medications list prior to admission included the muscle relaxant cyclobenzaprine five (5) milligrams and the pain medication Neurontin 600 mg were ordered for bedtime. Review of Resident #11's progress notes revealed the resident arrived to the facility on [DATE] at 6:45 P.M. Review of Resident #11's February 2024 medication administration record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to notify the physician of a significant weight change for Resident #34. This affected one (Resident #34) of three residents reviewed for notification of change. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of Resident #34's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/12/23. The resident was discharged from the facility on 08/22/23. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease stage four. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/24/23, revealed Resident #34 was cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #34's physician orders, revealed an order for weekly weights, one time per day every four weeks on Wednesday. Review of Resident #34's plan of care dated 07/26/23, revealed the resident had altered cardiovascular status related to arrhythmia, mitral insufficiency, mitral prolapse, aortic valve stenosis, and hypertension, with a goal to remain free from signs/symptoms of complications. Interventions included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders to obtain weekly weights for Resident #34. This affected one (Resident #34) of three residents reviewed for weights. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of Resident #34's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/12/23. The resident was discharged from the facility on 08/22/23. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, anemia, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease stage four. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/24/23, revealed Resident #34 was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of one staff for toileting and personal hygiene. Review of Resident #34's physician orders,dated 07/12/23, revealed an order for weekly weights, one time per day every four weeks on Wednesday. Review of Resident #34's plan of care dated 07/26/23, revealed the resident had altered cardiovascular status related to arrhythmia, mitral insufficiency, mitral prolapse, aortic valve stenosis, and hypertension, with a goal to remain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-11-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility's policy, observation and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary and homelike environment. This affected three resident rooms and six residents (#2, #9, #38, #46, #51, and #56) who resided in the those rooms. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Observation on 11/21/21 between 9:00 A.M. and 11:00 A.M. revealed three resident rooms had sticky fly traps suspended from the ceiling with dead flies noted on each trap. The sticky fly trap in Resident #2 and #38's room was located on the wall above the television on bed #1's side of the room and contained 10 dead flies. The sticky fly trap in Resident #46 and #51's room was located on the ceiling directly over Resident #51's bed and contained in excess of 50 dead flies. The sticky fly trap in Resident #9 and #56's room was located on the ceiling attached to a hook on the privacy curtain track between Resident #9 and #56's beds and contained approximately 30 dead flies. No active fly activity was observed during these observations. Observation on 11/22/21 between 8:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-24 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, review of self-reported incidents (SRIs), review of a facility employee handbook, and review of a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) memorandum, the facility failed to reasonable allow residents to have visitors of their choosing. This affected one (#4) of one resident reviewed for visitation. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/09/21. Diagnoses included hypertensive heart disease, morbid obesity, muscle weakness, and localized edema. Review of the most recently completed Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/26/21, revealed Resident #4 had intact cognition. Interview on 11/21/21 at 11:59 A.M. with Resident #4 stated a former dietary staff member (Dietary Aide (DA) #877) recently quit working in the facility and wanted to come visit him, but the Administrator told her she was not allowed to enter the facility for visits. A telephone interview was conducted on 11/22/21 at 10:12 A.M. with Human Resources Manager (HRM) #725 who verified DA #877 no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-24 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolated
    Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, review of a facility policy, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) COVID-19 guidance, the facility failed to ensure a Resident (#57) was not involuntary secluded to their room unnecessarily. Resident #57 was the only resident in the facility identified as being on COVID-19 quarantine. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of Resident #57's medical record revealed an original admission date of 06/11/19 and a most recent readmission date of 11/19/21. Diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, morbid severe obesity, and unspecified immunodeficiency. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/25/21, revealed Resident #57 had intact cognition. Review of a document titled, COVID-19 Vaccine Registration Form, revealed Resident #57 received her first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine on 06/17/21 and her second dose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-24 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to evaluate the need for use of a restraint and routinely re-evaluate for continued use of a restraint. This affected one (Resident #26) of one resident reviewed for restraint use. The facility identified one resident with a physical restraint. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbance, schizoaffective disorder, psychotic disorder with hallucinations, Alzheimer's disease, and abnormal posture. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/10/21, revealed Resident #26 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #26 utilized a chair that prevented her from rising and a bed alarm. Review of the plan of care, initiated 06/29/20, revealed Resident #26 used a geri walker related to a history of falling, dementia, and inability to keep…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care to include the use of a restraint. This affected one (Resident #26) of 21 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #26 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance, schizoaffective disorder, psychotic disorder with hallucinations, Alzheimer's disease, and abnormal posture. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/10/21, revealed Resident #26 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #26 utilized a chair that prevented her from rising and a bed alarm. Review of the plan of care, initiated 06/29/20, revealed Resident #26 used a geri walker related to a history of falling, dementia, and inability to keep her head upright when walking. The plan of care was silent for any care planned interventions utilizing the use of a bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #43's environment was free from accident hazards. This affected one (Resident #43) of four residents reviewed for accident hazards. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 01/08/21. Diagnoses included schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, agoraphobia with panic disorder, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (stroke), and voice and resonance disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/08/21, revealed Resident #43 had a moderate degree of cognitive impairment. The assessment indicated Resident #43 felt depressed seven to 11 days during the review period but did not have thoughts he would be better off dead. Review of the care plan for Resident #43 revealed it identified the presence of behavioral symptoms that may be harmful to himself, including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to monitor and timely follow up on a resident's significant weight loss. This affected one (Resident #26) of four residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility identified four residents with unplanned significant weight gain or loss. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance, schizoaffective disorder, psychotic disorder with hallucinations, Alzheimer's disease, and abnormal posture. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/10/21, revealed Resident #26 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of the plan of care, initiated 07/12/18, revealed Resident #26 had a nutritional problem related to dementia, dysphasia, and not wanting to eat. Interventions included to monitor weights. Review of the Mini Nutritional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-24 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were followed up with by the physician in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #32) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of Resident #32's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/07/21. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/14/21, revealed Resident #32 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #32 displayed no behaviors during the review period. Review of Resident #32's physician orders revealed an order with a start date of 05/13/21 and a discontinuation date of 09/14/21 for Lorazepam Tablet 0.5 milligrams (mg) to be given .25 mg as needed for anxiety behaviors twice daily. The as needed (PRN) exceeded the 14 day limit for a PRN anti-anxiety medication. Review of Resident #32's pharmacy reviews revealed on 06/14/21 a pharmacy review was completed and the pharmacist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure resident's as needed (PRN) antianxiety medications were limited to 14 days or had a rationale for extension. This affected one (Resident #32) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of Resident #32's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/07/21. Diagnoses included anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #32's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/14/21, revealed Resident #32 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #32's physician orders revealed an order with a start date of 05/13/21 and a discontinuation date of 09/14/21 for Lorazepam Tablet 0.5 milligrams (mg) to be given .025 mg as needed for anxiety behaviors twice daily. The as needed (PRN) exceeded the 14 day limit for a PRN anti-anxiety medication. Review of Resident #32's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for May 2021 through November 2021 revealed Resident #32 had her PRN Lorazepam available for 124 days. No…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-24 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to provide beverage consistencies in accordance with physician orders and the care plan. This affected one (Resident #43) of seven residents reviewed for hydration and/or nutrition. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 01/08/21. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (stroke), Type II diabetes mellitus, and dysphagia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/08/21, revealed Resident #43 had a moderate degree of cognitive impairment. The assessment indicated Resident #43 required extensive assistance by one staff person for eating, and experienced coughing or choking during meals. Review of the physician orders for Resident #43 revealed an order, dated 08/24/21, for nectar-thick liquids. Review of the care plan for Resident #43 revealed it identified a swallowing problem due to dysphagia, with a goal to have reduced aspiration. The plan included an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2019-05-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to properly store boxes of food and failed to ensure food safety by properly storing food scoops. This had the potential to affect 72 residents identified by the facility as receiving meals from the kitchen. Findings include: Observation on 05/19/19 at 8:40 A.M. revealed food scoops were left inside four cereal bins on a rolling cart. The handle of the food scoop was in contact with the cereal in each of the four cereal containers. Interview on 05/19/19 at 8:40 A.M. with [NAME] #92 revealed the scoops were just left in the cereal containers during breakfast. Observation on 05/19/19 at 8:41 A.M. revealed a plastic cup scoop was inside a barrel of thickener in the dry good storage room. Interview on 05/19/19 at 8:41 A.M. with the Dietary Manager (DM) #90 verified there was a cup scoop inside the barrel of thickener. Observation on 05/19/19 at 8:36 A.M. revealed a box of milk was left on the floor in the outdoor walk-in cooler. Interview on 05/19/19 at 8:36 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #90 verified the box…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-05-22 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, review of a menu preference sheets, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided a choice in menu selection. This affected 26 residents (#7, #10, #11, #13, #15, #17, #19, #21, #23, #24, #27, #30, #32, #35, #38, #39, #40, #41, #47, #50, #55, #58, #60, #63, #66, and #67) who were not provided a choice in menu selection on 05/10/19. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #38 had an admission date of 11/22/17. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lymphedema, depressive disorder, diabetes mellitus type two, hypertension, persistent mood disorder, anxiety disorder, and morbid obesity. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) annual assessment, dated 04/13/19, revealed Resident #38 had intact cognition. The resident required setup help and supervision for eating meals. Review of a nurse's progress note dated 05/10/19 at 11:35 P.M. revealed Resident #38 was upset with supper and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-05-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview, medical record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents who had skin protectant geriatric sleeves were treated in a dignified manner. This affected two (#57 and #59) of five reviewed for dignity. The facility identified 69 residents who received preventative skin care. In addition, the facility failed to allow a resident to finish a meal when a staff member removed a food tray from a resident room before the resident was finished eating. This affected one (#50) of 14 residents observed eating breakfast in their room on the South Hall. The census was 72. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #57's medical record for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 05/10/18. Diagnoses included spinal stenosis, insomnia, anxiety disorder, dementia, atrial fibrillation, hypomagnesaemia, pain, aortic insufficiency, hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia, heart failure, and heart disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/08/19, revealed Resident #57 was severely cognitively impaired.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-05-22 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of an admission packet, the facility failed to issue a notice of the facility's bed hold policy upon transfer to the hospital for one (#10) of one residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility identified 21 residents identified by the facility who were transferred to the facility in the last 90 days. The census was 72. Findings include: Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/14/19. Diagnoses included urinary tract infection, extended spectrum beta lactamase (EBSL) resistance, difficulty walking, major depression, diabetes mellitus type II, and morbid severe obesity. Review of discharge return anticipated Minimum Date Set (MDS) assessments completed on 03/01/19 and 05/14/19 revealed Resident #10 had unplanned discharges to an acute hospital. A quarterly MDS assessment was completed on 04/19/19 and revealed Resident #10 was cognitively intact. Review of a nursing progress note and resident transfer form dated 03/01/19 revealed Resident #10 was transferred to the hospital due to an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure smoking care plan supports were in place for cognitively impaired residents who smoked. This affected one (#269) of two residents reviewed for smoking. The facility identified seven residents who smoked. The facility census was 72. Finding include: Review of Resident #269 medical record revealed an admission date 05/01/19. Diagnoses included symbolic dysfunctions, atrial fibrillation, osteoarthritis, schizophrenia, heart disease, type II diabetes, hypertension, dementia, atrial flutter, heart failure, and muscle weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/08/19, revealed Resident #269 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #269's care plan, revised 05/14/19, revealed the care plan was silent to supports and interventions for smoking. Review of Resident #269's Smoking assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #269 smoked. The assessment indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview, medical record review, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to position a resident in a manner to allow reasonable access to food items during a meal. This affected one (#50) of 14 residents observed eating breakfast in their room on the South Hall. The census was 72. Findings include: Review of Resident #50's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/24/09. Diagnoses included retention of urine, cerebral infarction, cellulitis, hemiplegia, Alzheimer's disease, major depression, and anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/27/19, revealed Resident #50 was cognitively intact, required extensive one person physical assistance for eating, and extensive two person plus assistance of staff for bed mobility. Review of an activities of daily living (ADL) care plan revealed Resident #50 needed staff assistance with ADLs related to weakness, impaired mobility, and obesity. The care plan included interventions for Resident #50 to participate in care to the greatest extent possible then staff to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to follow their smoking policy to keep smoking materials secured for two (#62 and #13) of three residents reviewed for smoking. The facility census was 72. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #62's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/08/17. Diagnoses included altered mental status, dysphagia, malignant neoplasm of lung, ataxia, protein calorie malnutrition, nicotine dependence, dementia, hypotension, and alcohol abuse. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/19/19, revealed Resident #62 was cognitive intact. Review of Resident #62's care plan revised 05/20/19 revealed supports and interventions for potential for ineffective breathing patterns related to smoking, activities. Observation on 05/20/19 at 9:10 A.M. found Resident #62 was in the smoking area and had a pack of Kool brand cigarettes and a lighter in the front pocket of his shirt. Resident #62 was observed lighting his own cigarette and placing the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-05-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview, medical record review, review of a nurse aide communication book, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent of bowel and urine were provided timely incontinence care for one (#270) of one resident reviewed for bladder and bowel incontinence. The facility identified 53 residents who were assessed as incontinent of bowel and bladder. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure an anchoring device was in place to attempt to secure the tubing of an indwelling urinary catheter for one (#6) of one resident reviewed for urinary catheters. The facility had seven residents with indwelling urinary catheters. The census was 72. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #270's medical record revealed an original admission date of 06/21/18, and a re-admission date of 05/10/19. Diagnoses included sepsis with unspecified organism, anxiety, morbid severe obesity, major depression, cellulitis of the left lower limb, and congestive heart failure. Review of an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-07-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel records, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure employee reference checks were completed and failed to complete employee verification in the Ohio Abuse Registry. This had the potential to affect all 61 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the personnel record for Activity Aide (AA) #211 revealed a hire date of 10/27/23. Further review of the personnel record revealed no verification the employee was checked in the Ohio Abuse Registry. Review of the personnel record for State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #272 revealed a hire date of 10/10/23. Further review of the personnel record revealed no reference checks were completed. Review of the personnel record for STNA #214 revealed a hire date of 09/01/23. Further review of the personnel record revealed no reference checks were completed. Review of the personnel record for Housekeeper (HSK) #225 revealed a hire date of 03/21/24. Further review of the personnel record revealed no verification the employee was checked in the Ohio Abuse Registry. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-07-25 · tag F0922 — failed to maintain the building's systems — widespread
    Have enough backup water supply for essential areas of the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow their procedure to have an adequate emergency water supply for the facility. This had the potential to affect all residents. Facility census was 61. Findings include: Interview with the Director of Nursing and Director of Maintenance #500 on 07/24/24 at 3:36 P.M. verified the facility did not have an emergency water supply on site. The Director of Maintenance stated the emergency water supply was kept off site. Review of the facility's undated policy titled Emergency Water Supply revealed the facility would provide three days of food and water for staff or other persons which will stay at the facility during an emergency. Furthermore, the facility's policy stated the water would be stored in the old assembly hall supply closet.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-07-25 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel files, staff interview, and review of an employee job description, the facility failed to ensure State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNAs) received twelve hours of training annually. This had the potential to affect all 61 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the personnel file for STNA #223 revealed a hire date of 03/29/21. There were no hours of education completed in the past year in the STNA's personnel file. Review of the personnel file for STNA #249 revealed a hire date of 12/15/20. There were no hours of education completed in the past year in the STNA's personnel file. Review of the personnel file for STNA #272 revealed a hire date of 10/10/23. There were no hours of education completed in the past year in the STNA's personnel file. Review of the personnel file for STNA #213 revealed a hire date of 09/01/23. There were no hours of education completed in the past year in the STNA's personnel file. Interview on 07/25/24 at 9:33 A.M. with Human Resources Staff (HRS) #212 revealed the nursing department kept track of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
HERETH, JACKIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/01/2005
COSTELLO, GREGORYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 05/19/2010

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+28.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$456K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 78%Medicare 2%Other / private 20%

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $456K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$386per resident / day
operating cost
$11,725per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$536per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365681. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-07-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next