Brethren Retirement Community

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 122 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 53 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 71.6 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.37 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.35 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.62 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-03-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer care treatments were initiated timely and wound assessments were thoroughly completed to prevent the worsening of a pressure ulcer. Actual harm occurred to Resident #12 when the resident was readmitted to the facility with a stage II pressure ulcer (partial-thickness skin loss with exposed dermis) on assessment and no treatment orders were implemented until concerns were voiced by the resident's representative several days later. This resulted in Resident #12's pressure ulcer worsening to a stage III pressure ulcer (full-thickness skin loss) and associated deterioration and drainage. This affected one (#12) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 69. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 01/30/24 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, osteoarthritis, hypothyroidism, hypertension, atrial…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2019-05-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of an incident report, observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #88's fall interventions were implemented to prevent falls in accordance with the resident's fall risk care plan. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #88's call light was not within reach at the time the resident experienced a fall, the resident was subsequently hospitalized and required surgical intervention for a left hip fracture. In addition, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented a second resident's (#14) fall interventions in accordance with the care plan which did not result in injury. This affected two (#88 and #14) of two residents reviewed for falls and accidents. The facility census was 110. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #88's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include dementia with Lewy Bodies, dysphagia, hypertension, major depressive disorder and hyperlipidemia. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview and review of facility policy,the facility failed to ensure wound treatment orders were completed as ordered. This affected one resident (#12) of three reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 67.Findings include:Review of medical record for Resident #12 revealed admission date of 01/31/25. The resident's medical diagnosis included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), osteoarthritis, Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), anxiety, depression and peripheral autonomic neuropathy. The resident remained in the facility.The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating intact cognition. He was independent with eating and dependent upon staff for toileting hygiene, bed mobility and transfers.Review of the physician orders revealed Resident #12 had an order dated 04/29/26 to cleanse the skin tear on the right lower leg with wound cleanser and apply a band aid daily.Observation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-09-19 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews, employee record review, and policy review, the facility failed to employ a full time Director of Nursing (DON) for the skilled nursing facility. This had the potential to affect all 71 residents in the facility. Findings include: Interview on 09/19/25 with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #448 confirmed the DON is over the skilled nursing and assisted living residents. Interview also confirmed the DON has been over the skilled nursing and assisted living residents for the past two years. Interview on 09/19/25 at 11:56 A.M. with the DON confirmed she has worked as the DON for the skilled nursing facility (SNF) and assisted living facility (ALF) full time since June 2025. Interview also confirmed she addresses concerns on the SNF and the AL as they arise and that she doesn't know how much time she spends on the SNF or the AL each week. Interview on 09/19/25 at 12:35 P.M. with the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) confirmed the DON is over the SNF and AL for the community full time. Interview also confirmed she has never been told the DON could not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, staff interviews, review of self-reported incident (SRI), review of witness statements, review of in-service, review of employee file, review of corrective action, and review of policy, the facility failed to protect residents from neglect/physical abuse. This affected one (#1) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 05/24/23. Diagnoses include Alzheimer's disease, dementia without behavioral disturbance, and symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions and awareness. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with personal hygiene. Review of the facility investigation revealed a hand-written statement from the Certified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, a resident representative interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided a dignified dining experience when residents were not provided meals timely. This affected three (#19, #47, and #53) of ten residents observed in the 500 Hall dining room. The facility census was 69. Findings included: Observation on 03/05/25 from 11:37 A.M. to 1:13 P.M. revealed, at 11:37 A.M., staff assisted residents to the 500 Hall dining room and started to serve the residents drinks. Observation at 11:58 A.M. revealed 10 residents to be sitting in the dining room. Observation at 12:04 P.M. revealed staff started to serve residents their lunch trays in the dining room and meal trays were delivered to the rooms of the residents who did not come to the dining room for lunch. Observation at 12:35 P.M. revealed three (#19, #47, and #53) residents out of the 10 residents in the dining room had not been served a lunch tray while the other seven residents were actively eating their meals or had finished their meals and were leaving the dining room.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure wheelchairs were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This affected one (#1) of five reviewed for wheelchair cleanliness. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Observation on 03/03/25 at 9:58 A.M. revealed Resident #1's wheelchair had a thick coating of food particles on the left side covering the lower rails and the left side of the seat cushion. Observation and interview on 03/04/25 at 2:43 P.M. with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #491 verified the appearance of Resident #1's wheelchair during the observation. CNA #491 stated it was the responsibility of the third shift CNAs to clean resident wheelchairs. Interview on 03/04/25 at 3:00 P.M. with Chief Clinical Officer #505 provided additional verification of the appearance of Resident #1's wheelchair. Review of the undated policy titled, Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident-Care Equipment, revealed resident-care equipment will be cleaned.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident representative interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure care conferences were completed as required. This affected one (#32) of one residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 69. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 06/03/24 with diagnoses of dementia, osteoarthritis, congestive heart failure, and chronic kidney disease stage III. Review of Resident #32's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #32 had severely impaired cognition and required partial/moderate staff assistance with toilet hygiene, bed mobility, transfers and substantial/maximum assistance with bathing. Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed no documentation to support the facility conducted a care conference since the initial care conference in June 2024. Interview on 03/03/25 at 3:23 P.M. with Resident #32's representative stated the facility had not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were reviewed by the physician and failed to ensure physician responses to pharmacy recommendations were accurate. This affected two (#11 and #31) of the five residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 69. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 09/05/23 with diagnoses of dementia, Parkinson's disease, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), depression, and anxiety. Review of Resident #11's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/14/25, revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment, required partial/moderate staff assistance with bathing and bed mobility, substantial/maximum assistance with toilet hygiene and transfers and received antipsychotic and antidepressant medications. Review of Resident #11's physician orders revealed an order dated 09/06/23 for the antidepressant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure recommendations for gradual dose reductions of psychotropic medications were attempted or completed as required. This affected one (#11) of five residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 69. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 09/05/23 with diagnoses of dementia, Parkinson's disease, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), depression, and anxiety. Review of Resident #11's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/14/25, revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment, required partial/moderate staff assistance with bathing and bed mobility, substantial/maximum assistance with toilet hygiene and transfers, and received antipsychotic and antidepressant medications. Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed a physician order dated 09/06/23 for the antidepressant medication duloxetine 60 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth every bedtime. Review of the medical record for Resident #11…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0825 — isolated
  Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, nurse practitioner interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received specialized rehabilitative services as determined by their comprehensive plan of care to assist them to attain, maintain or restore, their highest practicable level of physical, mental, functional and psycho-social well-being. This affected one (#28) of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The census was 69. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an admission date of 10/20/23. Diagnoses included hemiplegia following a stroke affecting the left dominant side, depression, type two diabetes mellitus, and congestive heart failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #28 was cognitively intact, required assistance with eating, and was dependent for toileting hygiene, bed mobility, and transfers. Review of Resident #28's care plan revealed the resident was at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, facility policy review, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website, the facility failed to ensure residents on infection control precautions had appropriate signage posted, failed to ensure adequate personal protective equipment (PPE) was worn for care provided to residents on infection control precautions, and failed to ensure PPE was properly disposed of after use. This affected three (#12, #38, and #179) of three residents reviewed for infection control precautions. The facility census was 69. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #179 revealed an admission date of 02/28/25. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, herpes simplex virus (HSV-1), and right hip dislocation. Review of Resident #179's physician orders revealed the resident was ordered contact isolation for a diagnosis of Clostridium difficile (C. diff) with a start date of 02/28/25 and end date of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-04-02 for 22 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH