No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Westover Retirement Community

855 Stahlheber Road, Hamilton, OH 45013 · Non profit - Corporation · 53 certified beds · (513) 844-8004 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (513) 844-8004 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 9 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 5 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1 N Brookwood Ave
Pharmacy
28 N Brookwood Ave · (513) 863-8906 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
ALDI0.2 mi
1431 Main St · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
345 N Washington Blvd · (724) 586-1165 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1068 Stahlheber Rd · (513) 887-6736

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.8%5.3%15.4%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.6%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%0.2%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%0.4%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.7%30.1%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.6%3.2%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.3%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication27.5%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine86.4%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.0%3.4%4.7%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.2%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.3%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.4%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.0%75.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.3%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.9%12.9%12.0%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 81 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
20.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.51U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.25hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.23hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 20.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.51 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.2%CMS range 46.3–66.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.4%CMS range 7.7–15.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge20.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge20.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge16.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.6%CMS range 4.2–13.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.741.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.66
RN hours/ resident / day
1.69
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.05
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.40
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.42
RN hoursweekends
50.8%
Total nursing turnover
37.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 53 beds and averages 45.4 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.40 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.57 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

0
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-18)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-10)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

9 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. This affected one resident (#43) of four resident assessments reviewed. The facility census was 51. Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 02/26/25 with diagnoses including type II diabetes mellitus with polyneuropathy and generalized anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments dated 06/23/25 and 09/23/25 revealed the resident had no oral or dental issues. Observation on 11/19/25 at 1:58 P.M. of Resident #43 revealed the resident to be without natural upper teeth.Interview with Resident #43 at the time of the observation revealed the resident had lost several teeth since her admission to the facility. Resident #43 verbalized wishes to see a dentist however she has not been offered assistance in obtaining a dental appointment since her admission. Interview on 11/20/25 at 10:38 A.M. with Minimum Data Set Registered Nurse (MDS RN) #70 revealed she was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow a physician order for referral services. This affected one Resident (#43) of four residents reviewed for physician orders for referral services. The facility census was 51. Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 02/26/25 with diagnoses including type II diabetes mellitus with polyneuropathy and generalized anxiety.Review of the provider progress note dated 07/22/25 revealed Resident #43 was seen by Nurse Practitioner (NP) #105 and the resident was referred to neurology related to neuropathy. Review of the nurse's progress note dated 07/22/25 and timed 5:52 A.M. revealed a nurse's note stating Resident #43 was referred to neurology by NP #105 related to neuropathy. Resident with left foot and leg heaviness, numbness and having a hard time lifting leg and foot. Resident made aware of the referral. Review of a provider's progress note dated 07/28/25 and signed at 2:58 P.M. by NP #105 revealed Resident #43 had previously been referred to neurology for left leg and foot…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure timely dental services. This affected one resident (#43) of four residents reviewed. The facility census was 51.Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 02/26/25 with diagnoses including type II diabetes mellitus with polyneuropathy and generalized anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments dated 06/23/25 and 09/23/25 revealed the resident had no issues with oral or dental status. Additional review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed no documentation regarding a dental care plan or attempts to schedule a dental appointment. Observation on 11/19/25 at 1:58 P.M. of Resident #43 revealed the resident to be without natural upper teeth. Interview with Resident #43 at the time of the observation revealed the resident had lost several teeth since her admission to the facility. Resident #43 verbalized wishes to see a dentist however she has not been offered assistance in obtaining a dental appointment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to provide activities for a resident in isolation. This affected one (#22) out of one residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 04/26/24. Diagnoses include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, and dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed resident with moderate cognitive impairment. Resident required set-up assistance with eating, partial assistance for oral hygiene and bathing, substantial assistance with dressing, personal hygiene, bed mobility, and transfers, and was dependent on staff assistance with toileting hygiene. Review of Resident #22's care plan, dated 05/09/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff, pharmacy staff and Nurse Practitioner (NP) interviews and review of medication information from Medscape, the facility failed to ensure a resident received a cardiac medication as as ordered resulting in significant medication errors. This affected one (#207) out of one residents reviewed for medication errors. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #207 revealed an admission date of 10/04/24. Diagnoses include intervertebral disc degeneration, lumbar region without mention of lumbar back pain or lower extremity pain, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and acute on chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed no information was available due to Resident #207 being a new admission. Review of Resident #207's physician orders revealed an order dated 10/04/24 for Entresto Oral Tablet 24-26 milligrams (mg) (Sacubitril-Valsartan), give one (1) tablet by mouth two times a day related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-10-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, policy review, review of online resources from Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidance, and review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) memorandums, the facility failed to initiate immediate outbreak testing when an employee tested positive for COVID-19, failed to ensure visitation was suspended when an employee tested positive for COVID-19, failed to ensure staff wore personal protective equipment (PPE) in the facility to prevent the potential spread of Coronavirus (COVID-19), and failed to ensure staff administered medications utilizing proper infection control practices to prevent the potential spread of infectious disease. This had the potential to affect all 40 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the COVID-19 employee testing revealed, on 09/24/21, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #82 tested positive for COVID-19 and on 09/28/21 and LPN #18 tested positive for COVID-19. Review of the nursing schedule revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-10-05 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — widespread
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) memorandums, the facility failed to initiate immediate outbreak testing when an employee tested positive for COVID-19. This had the potential to affect all 40 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the COVID-19 employee testing revealed, on 09/24/21, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #82 tested positive for COVID-19 and on 09/28/21 and LPN #18 tested positive for COVID-19. Review of the nursing schedule revealed LPN #18 worked on 09/14/21 on the facility's [NAME] wing, and 09/15/21, 09/16/21, and 09/28/21 on the facility's [NAME] wing and LPN #82 worked on 09/19/21 on the facility's [NAME] wing. Review of the punch detail report for LPN #18 revealed she clocked in on 09/28/21 at 6:32 A.M. and clocked out at 10:00 A.M. During interview on 09/28/21 at 10:51 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated LPN #82 became symptomatic and tested positive for COVID-19 prior to the start of her shift…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-10-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of abnormal blood glucose and blood pressure levels. This affected one (Resident #08) of one resident reviewed for notification. The facility census was 40. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #08 revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anemia, anxiety disorder, peripheral vascular disease, major depressive disorder, heart failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hyperlipidemia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, chronic atrial fibrillation, and pulmonary hypertension. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] the resident had intact cognition. Review of the physician's orders revealed orders dated 04/06/21 to check blood glucose before meals and at bedtime and call the attending practitioner and follow the Abnormal Glucose Policy if glucose is over 350 mg/dL (milligrams per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-10-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure there was ongoing communication, coordination and collaboration between the facility and the dialysis center. This affected one (Resident #35) of one resident who received dialysis in the facility. The census was 40. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #35 revealed an original admission date of 07/14/21. Additional admissions /discharges included resident was discharged with a return not anticipated on 07/21/21 and readmitted on [DATE]. Diagnosis included hypertensive emergency, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease with end stage renal disease with dependence on renal dialysis and congestive heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/20/21, revealed Resident #35 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, did not reject care, was a one-person physical assist, required limited assistance and/or supervision for activities of daily living and received dialysis.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
COMMUNITY FIRST SOLUTIONSOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL100%since 09/01/2010
ABNER, PETEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
COHEN, NEILIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
EGLOFF, TIMOTHYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
FANT, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
KIRSCH, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
LOVEBERRY, RAQUELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
MILLER, ROBINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
MULLIGAN, LAWRENCEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
OPPENHEIMER, RANDYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
SCHUSTER, ANDREWIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
WEIGEL, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
WHALEN, JONIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
ZIEPFEL, NICHOLASIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
KIRKPATRICK, BRETTIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/04/2018
KRAUSE, BRIANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/01/2020
ARK WELLNESS CENTEROrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/21/2024
FIFTH THIRD BANKOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/14/2025
MEDICINE INPATIENT GROUP LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/14/2025
SELECT REHABILITATION, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2019
LAWRENCE, KELLEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/18/2013
WATSON, CHARMAINEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/30/2015
CHERRY BEKAERT LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
PLANTE & MORAN PLLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
CHITWOOD, JENNIFERIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/05/2020
HAMED, HUSAMIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
SITCHANOFF, MIRANDAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 49 rows in the source record cover these 27 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-10.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$884K
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 9%Medicare 6%Other / private 85%

This home reported $884K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$410per resident / day
operating cost
$12,479per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$371per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366232. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next