Gables Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 179 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 58.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 94 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 86 beds and averages 73.5 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.85 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.46 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.01 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.62 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility's infection prevention and control program, review of the facility's legionella prevention program, review of infection logs and reports, observations, interviews with facility staff, review of Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines, and facility policy review, the facility failed to identify and address infection trends, failed to adequately monitor water temperatures per the facility's water management plan, failed to ensure gloves were appropriately changed during incontinence care for Resident #74, and failed to perform hand hygiene to prevent the spread of infection prior to insulin administration for Resident #40. This had the potential to affect 75 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 75.Findings include: 1.Review of the facility's monthly infection control logs for November 2025, December 2025, January 2026, February 2026, March 2026, and April 2026 revealed 29 treated urinary tract infections (UTI). Further review revealed 10 UTI's were tested…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0655 — pattern
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided baseline care plans as required. This affected five residents (#6, #38, #84, #102) of 15 residents sampled for baseline care plans. The census was 75.Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #6 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cardiomegaly, pleural effusion, anxiety, constipation, and atrial fibrillation. Review of Resident #6 base line care plan dated 02/19/26 and baseline care plan summary dated 02/19/26 revealed no documentation of the resident being provided information or received a copy of the baseline care plan until seven days later on 02/26/26 when the resident signed the document. Interview with 04/27/26 at 12:37 P.M. with Resident #6 revealed they did not believe they had been part of a care plan conference of any kind. Interview on 04/29/26 at 2:30 P.M. with ADON #852 verified the signature of Resident #6 baseline care plan was dated 02/26/26 and the baseline care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, drug information review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered. There were four errors out of 25 medication administration opportunities for an error rate of 16%. This affected three residents (#40, #66 and #89) of six residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 75. Findings include:1.Medical record review revealed Resident #89 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with lower urinary tract symptoms.Review of the Order Summary Report dated April 2026 revealed Resident #89 was to receive Flomax 0.4 milligrams (mg) once a day for BPH.On 04/29/26 at 8:00 A.M., observation of the morning medication administration revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #844 dispensed Resident #89's Flomax capsule from the individual packaging onto the top of the medication cart. The top of the medication cart was observed to have scattered white granules…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents or their representative received written notice which specified the duration of the facility's bed-hold policy at the time of transfer. This affected two residents (#65 and #74) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1.Record review revealed Resident #65 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including obstructive sleep apnea, chronic respiratory failure, heart failure, myocardial infarction, nicotine dependence, and type two diabetes. Review of Resident #65's progress note dated 04/12/26 at 11:27 P.M. revealed Resident #65 had complaints of shortness of breath, lung sounds were diminished with little air movement, and the resident's oxygen saturation level was 91 percent (%) on room air. The resident was given an albuterol breathing treatment, after which Resident #65 stated they did not feel any better and had generalized abdominal pain. The facility's Medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive assessments were accurate. This affected two residents (#38 and #84) of 24 residents reviewed for comprehensive assessments. The census was 75. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #84 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, abnormalities of gait and mobility, acute myocardial infarction, ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation, hypotension, cerebral infarction and exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] and the 5-day MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #84 was cognitively intact for daily decision-making and had adequate vision with the use of corrective lenses. On 04/27/26 at 3:53 P.M., interview with Resident #84 revealed he was in need of an eye exam. The resident stated he had not seen an eye doctor or had new glasses for over 10 years…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were completed as required. This affected two residents (#5 and #39) of 25 residents reviewed for care plans. The census was 75.Findings include:1. Record review of Resident #39 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including insomnia, dementia, anxiety, constipation, hypertension, depression, gastro esophageal reflux disease, dysphagia, and hypertension. Review of Resident #39 progress note dated 04/13/26 at 6:30 P.M. revealed an order was received for an indwelling urinary catheter. Review of Resident #39 progress note dated 04/14/26 at 11:45 A.M. revealed 900 milliliter (ML) or urine was emptied for the residents indwelling urinary catheter. Review of Resident #39 progress note dated 04/14/26 at 11:59 A.M. revealed the medical director advised staff to leave the residents indwelling urinary catheter in place. Review of Resident #39 progress note dated 04/19/26 at 3:57 P.M. revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received adequate hygiene and showers. This affected one resident (#30) of one resident reviewed for activities of daily living. The census was 75. Findings include:Medical record review revealed Resident #30 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, gastric ulcer with perforation, dysphagia, severe protein calorie malnutrition, cardiac arrhythmia, cognitive impairment and incontinence. Review of the 5-day admission Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #30 was severely impaired for daily decision-making, was dependent on staff for shower and bathing and required substantial/maximal assistance with personal hygiene. Review of the Kardex revealed Resident #30 was to receive a shower on Tuesday and Friday dayshift. Review of the Task: Bathing/Showers and Shower Refusals dated 04/01/26 to 04/30/26 revealed Resident #30 had received no showers/baths and had no shower…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records, review of activity logs and calendars, and interviews with staff and residents, the facility failed to provide activities to meet the needs and interest for Resident #3 and Resident #84. This affected two residents (Resident #3 and Resident #84) of two residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 75.Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed admission to the facility on [DATE] and a re-admission on [DATE] with diagnoses including subdural hemorrhage (brain bleed), stroke affecting right dominant side, macular degeneration (progressive disease of the eye leading to blindness), hearing loss, constipation, depression, and high blood pressure. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 comprehensive assessment completed on 10/07/25 for Resident #3 revealed a brief interview for mental status score of 15/15 indicating no cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS revealed that Resident #3 was hard of hearing and had impaired…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, contract review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure vision services were provided as needed. This affected one resident (#84) of one resident sampled for communication. The census was 75. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #84 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, abnormalities of gait and mobility, acute myocardial infarction, ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation, hypotension, cerebral infarction and exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] and the 5-day MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #84 was cognitively intact for daily decision-making and had adequate vision with the use of corrective lenses. Review of the Order Summary Report dated 03/19/26 revealed Resident #84 may have ancillary services including optometry evaluations and treatment as indicated.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure a resident's incontinence brief was applied correctly resulting in the development of a pressure injury. This affected one resident (#74) of four residents reviewed for skin impairments. The census was 75.Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including pulmonary hypertension, type two diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Stage 4 chronic kidney disease, insomnia, bradycardia, and atrial fibrillation. Review of Resident #74's care plan dated 12/08/23 revealed the resident was at risk for impaired skin integrity related to easily bruising, incontinence, reduced bed mobility, and thin fragile skin. Goals include the resident will not develop any areas of pressure-related breakdown and the residents' skin integrity will remain intact. Interventions included applying cushions to wheelchair, assist resident with turning and repositioning on routine rounds…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH