Harbor Healthcare Of Ironton

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 128 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 64.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 77 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 125 beds and averages 114.7 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.82 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.552 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.29 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.98 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-04-10 · tag F0624 — isolated
  Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, review of an Against Medical Advice (AMA) form, hospital record review, review of the policy and procedure titled Discharging a Resident without a Physician's Approval policy and interviews with facility staff, Physician #399, a Patriot Emergency Medical Service representative, and an Amedysis Home Health representative, the facility failed to ensure a safe and orderly discharge for Resident #94, who had diagnoses including respiratory failure, protein-calorie malnutrition, osteomyelitis, cerebral infarction, sepsis, COVID-19 and dementia when the resident was discharged to an unsafe home environment on [DATE]. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE] at approximately 1:32 P.M., after the facility originally initiated and then allowed Resident #94 to discharge to a documented unsafe environment indicating the discharge was Against Medical Advice (AMA). Resident #94 had multiple medical conditions that required continual care including multiple skin tears, a Stage IV…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-04-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, review of facilities fall investigation and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure adequate assistance and safety interventions were in place to prevent falls during resident ambulation. This affected one resident (#27) of four residents reviewed for falls. Actual harm occurred on 02/20/23 when Resident #27, who required extensive assistance from one staff for ambulation sustained a fall resulting in a subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the space between the brain and the surrounding membrane), posterior head laceration and traumatic closed displaced fracture of shaft of right femur requiring surgical repair. At the time of the fall, State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #560 failed to utilize a gait belt while ambulating the resident. Additionally, the facility failed to comprehensively investigate the fall and implement individualized interventions to prevent further falls for Resident #27. The facility census was 92. Findings Include: Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the state Ombudsman's office was notified of resident discharge or transfer from the facility as required. This affected three (Resident #25, #76 and #99 ) of four residents reviewed. The facility census was 102. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #99, revealed an admission date of 09/12/24 and readmission date of 10/17/24. Diagnoses included but were not limited to infectious gastroenteritis and colitis, difficulty walking, abnormal posture, cerebral infarction and fracture of unspecified part of neck of left femur. Review of the nursing progress notes and resident census record revealed Resident #99 was transferred to the local hospital on [DATE] and 11/28/24. Review of the medical record revealed no evidence the state Ombudsman was notified of Resident #99's transfers to the hospital. Interview on 01/28/25 at 1:23 P.M. with the Administrator revealed the Ombudsman was not notified in writing of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a care plan that addressed dementia care and specific symptoms for depression care. This affected two (Resident #4 and #47) of five reviewed for dementia and depression. Facility census was 102. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #4, revealed an admission date of 10/22/21. Diagnoses included but were not limited to type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, dementia, and unspecified dementia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 out of 15. The resident was assessed to require substantial/maximal assistance with toilet hygiene, shower/bathe self, bed mobility, and transfers. This resident was also assessed to have non-Alzheimer's dementia, depression and bipolar disorder. Review of medical record revealed no plan of care for dementia care for Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-04-10 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure five residents (#46, #52, #57, #85 and #195) Minimum Data Set (MDS) were accurate in the area of diagnoses, contracture's and psychotropic medications. This affected five of 26 sampled residents. The census was 92. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #52 revealed an initial admission date of 08/16/21 with the latest readmission of 03/23/23. Diagnoses included quadriplegia, cervical disc disorder, acute transverse myelitis in demyelinating disease of central nervous system, polyosteoarthritis, hypothyroidism, anemia, chronic viral hepatitis C, stiffness of unspecified joint, resistance to multiple antibiotics, major depressive disorder, hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy, contracture of unspecified joint, osteoporosis, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder and bipolar disorder. Review of the nursing admission screening/history dated 08/16/21 revealed the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of the medical record for Resident #52 revealed an initial admission date of 08/16/21 with the latest readmission of 03/23/23. Diagnoses included quadriplegia, cervical disc disorder, acute transverse myelitis in demyelinating disease of central nervous system, polyosteoarthritis, hypothyroidism, anemia, chronic viral hepatitis C, stiffness of unspecified joint, resistance to multiple antibiotics, major depressive disorder, hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy, contracture of unspecified joint, osteoporosis, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder and bipolar disorder. Review of the nursing admission screening/history dated 08/16/21 revealed the resident had contracture's to the left hand, right hand, had foot drop and wears brace/boot for prevention and had foot drop to the left foot. Review of the MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident had clear speech, understood others, makes herself understood and had a BIMS score of 15 out of 15 indicating the resident had no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-04-10 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure appropriate antibiotic therapy was prescribed for the treatment of residents urinary tract infections. This affected four residents (#1, #19, #28, and #67) who were reviewed for prescribed antibiotic therapy during the annual survey. The facility census 92. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #1 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, hypertension, and dementia. Review of the results of urine culture, dated 03/19/23, revealed 10,000 - 100.000 colony formulating units per milliliter (cfu/ml) of the bacteria Escherichia coli (E-coli) was present. Review of the physicians order, dated 03/20/23 and discontinued on 03/21/23, revealed an order to administer 500 milligrams (mg) of Keflex (a broad spectrum antibiotic) three times a day for seven days for the treatment of a urinary tract infection. Review of the results of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-04-10 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of Medicare Notice of Non-Coverage forms, medical record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide accurate and timely notification of Medicare non-coverage. This affected one (Resident #149) of three residents reviewed for Medicare non-coverage. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #149 revealed an admission date of 11/25/22. Review of a physical therapy evaluation on 11/28/22 revealed the resident presented for therapy after hospitalization from 11/20/22 to 11/25/22 for pneumonia, hypotension, and septic shock. It stated she demonstrated unsteadiness on feet, gait impairments, and instability during standing. It stated she would be going to live with her daughter upon discharge. Review of a social history and discharge plan dated 11/28/22 revealed the resident lived with family prior to placement. A section for plans for length of stay stated short term with a question mark. It further stated her daughter wanted her to live with her upon discharge. A Minimum Data Set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-04-10 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a new Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) document after a significant change occurred. This affected one (Resident #57) of nine PASRR documents reviewed. The census was 92. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #57 revealed an initial date of 07/23/20 with the latest readmission of 02/05/22 with the admitting diagnoses including congestive heart failure, acute and chronic respiratory failure, sleep apnea, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cerebrovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, diverticulitis arthropathy, schizophrenia, dysphagia, history of COVID-19, benign prostatic hyperplasia, chronic embolism and thrombosis, anxiety disorder, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, constipation, unilateral inguinal hernia, adult failure to thrive and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #57's PASRR document, dated 07/22/20, revealed under Section D: Indications of Serious Mental Health,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-04-10 · tag F0660 — isolated
  Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of Medicare Notice of Non-Coverage forms, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge plan for a resident who was notified their Medicare coverage ended. This affected one (Resident #149) of three residents reviewed for Medicare non-coverage. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #149 revealed an admission date of 11/25/22. Review of a physical therapy evaluation on 11/28/22 revealed the resident presented for therapy after hospitalization from 11/20/22 to 11/25/22 for pneumonia, hypotension, and septic shock. It stated she demonstrated unsteadiness on feet, gait impairments, and instability during standing. It stated she would be going to live with her daughter upon discharge. Review of a social history and discharge plan dated 11/28/22 revealed the resident lived with family prior to placement. A section for plans for length of stay stated short term with a question mark. It further stated her daughter wanted her to live with her upon discharge. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-04-10 · tag F0661 — isolated
  Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of Medicare Notice of Non-Coverage forms, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to have a discharge summary that included a recapitulation of the resident's stay, a final summary of the resident's status, a reconciliation of medications, and a post-discharge plan of care developed with the resident/resident representative for a resident who was notified their Medicare coverage ended and left the facility. This affected one (Resident #149) of three residents reviewed for Medicare non-coverage. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #149 revealed an admission date of 11/25/22. Review of a physical therapy evaluation on 11/28/22 revealed the resident presented for therapy after hospitalization from 11/20/22 to 11/25/22 for pneumonia, hypotension, and septic shock. It stated she demonstrated unsteadiness on feet, gait impairments, and instability during standing. It stated she would be going to live with her daughter upon discharge. Review of a social history and discharge plan dated 11/28/22…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-04-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming. This affected one ( Resident #41) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 06/21/19 and diagnoses including vascular dementia, chronic kidney disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of Minimum Data Set assessment completed 01/05/23 indicated cognitive impairment. It further indicated the resident required extensive assistance from two staff for transfers and extensive assistance from one staff for personal hygiene, bathing, dressing, and locomotion. A plan of care dated 11/01/19 stated the resident had a self care deficit and will be dressed and groomed appropriately. It indicated the resident would receive assistance from staff. Observations on 03/27/23 at 4:52 P.M., 03/28/23 at 3:04 P.M., and 03/29/23 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ECC TRUST — 3 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH