Oaks Of West Kettering The
1150 West Dorothy Lane, Kettering, OH 45409 · For profit - Corporation · 118 certified beds · (937) 293-1152 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jul 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 5 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (59) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $75,572 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-22)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.5% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.0% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 83.8% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.3% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.0% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 23.8% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.9% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 15.7% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.0% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 70.1% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 33.6% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 2.0% | 12.9% | 12.0% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 50 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 32.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 46 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 58% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.2%CMS range 32.9–65.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.5%CMS range 7.7–15.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 32.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 32.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 21.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 79.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.1%CMS range 4.5–13.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.32 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 118 beds and averages 107.2 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.79 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.86 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.85 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
59 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interviews, facility policy review, and review of the guidelines from the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), the facility failed to thoroughly assess a resident's skin and failed to timely identify pressure ulcers (injuries to skin and underlying tissue caused by prolonged pressure, friction, or shear, usually over bony areas like the hips, heels, or tailbone) until they had reached an advanced stage. This resulted in Actual Harm for Resident #116 on 12/22/25, when the resident was admitted to the facility without pressure ulcers, was assessed to be at risk for development of pressure ulcers and developed an avoidable unstageable pressure ulcer (a full-thickness wound where damage depth is hidden by slough [a soft, moist, yellow or white devitalized tissue comprised of dead cells, fibrin, and bacteria that forms in the wound bed, acting as a significant barrier to healing by stalling the inflammatory phase] or eschar [a thick, dry, black or brown layer of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of emergency room (ER) records, staff interview, review of the facility's investigation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was safely turned in bed during incontinence care resulting in the resident falling out of bed. This resulted in Actual Harm when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #355 was providing incontinence care to Resident #116 and the resident rolled out of the bed onto the floor. Resident #116 was sent to hospital and was diagnosed with a head injury which required staples. This affected one (Resident #116) of the three residents reviewed falls. The facility census was 107.Findings included: Review of the medical record review for Resident #116 revealed an admission date of 11/12/25 and discharged home on [DATE]. Diagnoses included toxic liver disease, congestive heart failure, constipation, anemia, anxiety disorder, Alzheimer's disease, osteoarthritis, chronic kidney disease, sepsis due to Escherichia coli, and dementia.Review of comprehensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, observation, review of maintenance logs, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from accidents/hazards. This resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #66 utilized the first-floor restroom on 12/15/24 and while washing his hands, the floating handwashing sink fell on him resulting in a laceration to the left knee that required 17 sutures, the use of antibiotics for infection prevention and continued wound care. This affected one (#66) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 101. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #66, revealed an admission date of 11/11/24. Diagnoses included toxic encephalopathy, schizophrenia, chronic viral Hepatitis-C, visual hallucinations, auditory hallucinations, alcohol abuse, drug induced akathisia, muscle weakness and dysphagia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #66 dated 11/18/24, revealed Resident #66 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-07-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, review of a police report, review of facility document, and policy review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from sexual abuse by a visitor for one (Resident #137) of three resident's reviewed for abuse. This resulted in Actual Harm on 04/09/24 when Resident #48's significant other, Family Member (FM) #16, touched Resident #137's breasts and private area and exposed his genitalia to the resident on a patio in the facility courtyard where residents smoked. FM #16 admitted to the police that he committed the actions against the resident, despite Resident #137 telling him, No. The failure resulted in Resident #137 being tearful and so traumatized by this event, that it felt like she was raped. Findings included: Medical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident #137 on 07/01/22. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke), schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, tobacco use, depression, generalized anxiety disorder,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of facility investigations, review of hospital documentation, observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate interventions and/or supervision to ensure a resident who was assessed as being cognitively impaired and at risk for elopements did not elope from the facility. This resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #04 eloped from the secured memory care unit on 01/23/24 without staff knowledge, and was found outside the facility by a generator. Resident #04 sustained injuries from a fall that occurred during the elopement which required hospital evaluation and treatment for the placement of a suture to a lip laceration and for treatment of a right thigh contusion. This affected one (#04) of three residents reviewed for elopement risk. The census was 84. Findings include: Review of Resident #04's medical record revealed an admission dated 01/10/24. Diagnoses included anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, iron deficiency anemia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to properly store the resident's medications in the medication carts. This affected three of three medications carts observed. The facility had a total of six medication carts. The facility census was 106.Findings include:Observation with interview on 04/07/26 at 9:23 A.M. of Central One medication cart with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #205 revealed 20 loose pills scattered on the bottom of the top drawer of the medication cart under the resident's pill cards. All the pills were of different sizes and colors. Observation of Central Two medication cart with LPN #205 revealed eight loose pills scattered on the bottom of the top drawer of the cart under the resident's pill cards. All the pills were of different sizes and colors. LPN #205 confirmed both carts had pills scattered on the bottom of the drawers and the medications were not properly stored. LPN #205 stated the expectation was for staff to discard any medications that fall from the pill cards to the bottom of the drawer. Observation with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to provide a resident who required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) timely assistance with toileting hygiene. This affected one (#8) of three residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility census was 106.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 04/03/26. Diagnoses included encephalopathy, chronic kidney disease stage III, and anxiety. Review of a Nursing admission assessment, dated 04/03/26, revealed Resident #8 was alert and oriented to person only and required set-up assistance with toilet hygiene, bed mobility, and substantial/maximum staff assistance for transfers. Resident #8 was frequently incontinent of bladder and always continent of bowel. Observations on 04/08/26 from 7:39 A.M. to 8:03 A.M. revealed Resident #8 was in his geri-chair in the common area on the hall. Resident #8 was lying back in the geri-chair on his right side. Resident #8's sweatpants appeared to be wet near his peri-area and buttocks.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observations, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to initiate Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident with a dialysis catheter per the facility's policy. This affected one (#23) of three residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 106.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 03/19/26. Diagnoses included atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease stage IV.The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/26/26, revealed Resident #23 was cognitively intact and required supervision/touching assistance with toilet hygiene, bathing, transfers, and bed mobility. Resident #23 received dialysis. Review of Resident #23's physician orders revealed an order dated 03/19/26 for hemodialysis in-house on Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, and Friday. There were no orders to support an order for EBP or assessment of dialysis catheter. Observation with interview on 04/07/26 at 9:10 A.M. revealed Resident #23 sitting on the side of his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-03 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to assess residents for the use of bedrails prior to application of bed rails to the residents' beds. This affected 19 (Residents #3, #5, #6, #7, #9, #10, #13, #58, #61, #62, #65, #66, #67, #68, #69, #71, #72, #73, #74) of 19 residents reviewed for bed rails. The facility census was 107 residents. Findings include: Observation on 02/20/26 at 5:40 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the following residents had bedrails on their beds: #3, #5, #6, #7, #9, #10, #13, #58, #61, #62, #65, #66, #67, #68, #69, #71, #72, #73, #74. Interview on 02/20/26 at 5:44 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the following residents had bedrails on their beds: #3, #5, #6, #7, #9, #10, #13, #58, #61, #62, #65, #66, #67, #68, #69, #71, #72, #73, #74, The DON further confirmed the facility failed to assess these residents for the use of bedrails prior to the application of bed rails to the bed. Review of the facility policy titled, Side Rails (Bed Rails)-Use and Monitoring dated 02/05/26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, hospice interview, review hospice contracts, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a communication process with the hospice company regarding documentation and coordination of care. This affected three (Residents #14, #70, #73) of six residents on hospice. The facility census was 71 residents.Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 10/01/24 with diagnoses including hypertension, chronic kidney disease, dementia, and anorexia.Review of the physician's orders for Resident #14 revealed an order dated 06/19/25 indicating the resident was admitted to Hospice Company B with a terminal diagnosis of senile degeneration of brain.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #14 dated 12/27/25 revealed the resident had impaired cognition, required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), and was not marked as receiving hospice services. Review of the progress notes for Resident #14 dated January 2026 and February 2026 revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, review of chemical safety data sheet, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure chemicals were stored properly. This had the potential to affect all 21 residents on the memory care unit. The facility census was 112.Findings include:Observation on 11/24/25 from 9:15 A.M. through 9:20 A.M. of the Memory Care unit revealed the biohazard room was unlocked with sharps containers present that contained used needles and other medical supplies. Further observation revealed the shower room was unlocked with prescription Nystatin powder, Zinc/Nystatin cream, and Micro-Kill Two Germicidal Wipes on top of the unlocked cabinet. The Micro-Kill Two Germicidal Wipes container label had keep out of reach of children listed.Interview at the time of the observation with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the prescription Nystatin powder, Zinc/Nystatin cream, and Micro-Kill Two Germicidal Wipes should be stored in a locked cabinet. Interview also confirmed the Micro-Kill Two Germicidal Wipes label had keep out of reach of children…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, facility policy review, and review of Enhanced Information Dissemination and Collection system (EIDC) the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was investigated and reported. This affected one Resident (#103) of three residents reviewed for falsification of medical records. The facility census was 112.Findings Include:Record review for Resident #103 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Alzheimer's disease with late onset, vascular dementia with agitation, psychotic disorder with delusions, and delirium (confusion).Review of nurses note dated 10/17/25 at 9:55 P.M. revealed Resident #103 was observed walking up to another resident and pulled their hair. Staff immediately intervened and helped Resident #103 to their room.Review of EIDC records on 11/24/25 at 2:05 P.M. revealed there was no Self-Reported Incident (SRI) for the incident on 10/17/25 at 9:55 P.M.Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess pressure ulcer wounds upon admission. This affected two (#08 and #100) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care and services. The facility census was 95. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical records or Resident #08 revealed an admission date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included fracture of left fibula, sepsis, cellulitis, end stage renal disease, type two diabetes, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, anemia, abscess of foot, dependence on renal dialysis, and hypertension. Review of the care plan dated [DATE] revealed Resident #08 was, at risk for impaired skin integrity with interventions to monitor skin for moisture, apply barrier product as needed, monitor skin for redness, specifically over bony prominences, provide skin care per facility guidelines and PRN as needed. The care plan also stated, the resident has pressure ulcer to right buttock for pressure ulcer development with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to complete indwelling catheter care as per policy. This affected one (#62) rout of three residents reviewed for indwelling catheter care. The facility census was 95. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #62 revealed an admission date of 06/21/24 with medical diagnoses of chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic viral Hepatitis C, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, anemia, paraplegia. Further review revealed Resident #62 discharge to hospital on [DATE] and readmission to the facility on 06/13 /25. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/14/25, indicated Resident #62 was cognitively intact, was dependent upon staff for all activities of daily living and had an indwelling catheter. Review of the medical record revealed a care plan, dated 11/20/24, which stated Resident #62 had an urinary catheter related to neurogenic bladder with an intervention to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to complete pre-dialysis assessments thoroughly and failed to completed post dialysis assessments. This affected three (#07, #08, and #100) out of the three residents reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 95. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #07 revealed an admission date of 07/09/25 with medical diagnoses of left hemiplegia, end stage renal disease, dependence on dialysis, bipolar disorder, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/16/25, revealed Resident #07 had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent upon staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the physician orders for Resident #07 revealed an order dated 07/29/25 for hemodialysis in-house (contracted dialysis center located at the facility) on Mondays, Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Fridays. Review of Resident #07's hemodialysis care plan stated Resident #07 was at risk for clotting, hemorrhage, and infection at the access site with an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 44 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, staff and resident interviews, observations, and policy reviews, the facility failed to follow infection control procedures during wound and incontinence cares. This affected two (#08 and #62) out of three residents observed for infection control procedures. The facility census was 95. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #62 revealed an admission date of 06/21/24 with medical diagnoses of chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic viral Hepatitis C, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, anemia, paraplegia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/14/25, indicated Resident #62 was cognitively intact, was dependent upon staff for all activities of daily living and had an indwelling catheter. Review of the medical record revealed a care plan, dated 11/20/24, which stated Resident #62 had a urinary catheter related to neurogenic bladder with an intervention to perform catheter care every shift. Review of physician orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observations, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident room was free from flies. This affected one (#11) out of three residents reviewed for pests/insects in rooms. The facility census was 95. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 07/26/25 with medical diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, and hypertension. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/02/25, revealed Resident #11 had moderate cognitive impairment and required partial/moderate staff assistance with toilet hygiene and substantial/maximum assistance for bathing, transfers, and bed mobility. Observation with interview on 08/18/25 at 11:28 A.M. of Resident #11's room revealed six flies either flying in the room or sitting on Resident #11's bedsheets. Resident #11 stated he has had issues with flies in his room since he arrived at the facility. Interview on 08/18/25 at 11:33 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #256 confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a floating porcelain sink was maintained in a safe manner. This affected one (#66) resident of three residents reviewed for physical environment. The facility census was 101. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #66, revealed an admission date of 11/11/24. Diagnoses included toxic encephalopathy, schizophrenia, chronic viral hepatitis-C, visual hallucinations, auditory hallucinations, alcohol abuse, drug induced akathisia, muscle weakness and dysphagia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #66 dated 11/18/24, revealed Resident #66 had moderate cognitive impairment and the resident required moderate assistance with transfers and sitting to standing. Review of an incident report titled Skin Tear dated 12/15/24 at 11:23 A.M. and authored by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #233, revealed a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) reported Resident #66 was bleeding. There was blood noted in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, observation, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident's representative was notified when a resident had a change in condition by sustaining a laceration which required sutures and continued wound care. This affected one (#66) of three residents reviewed for notification of change in condition. The facility census was 101. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #66, revealed an admission date of 11/11/24. Diagnoses included toxic encephalopathy, schizophrenia, chronic viral hepatitis-C, visual hallucinations, auditory hallucinations, alcohol abuse, drug induced akathisia, muscle weakness and dysphagia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #66 dated 11/18/24, revealed Resident #66 had moderate cognitive impairment and the resident required moderate assistance with transfers and sitting to standing. Review of an incident report titled Skin Tear dated 12/15/24 at 11:23 A.M. and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — patternProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's East Unit crash cart included an assembled suction machine with canister, and a backboard. This affected 49 residents (#26, #27, #28, #29, #30, #31, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, #37, #38, #39, #40, #41, #42, #43, #44, #45, #46, #47, #48, #49, #50, #51, #52, #53, #54, #55, #56, #57, #58, #59, #60, #61, #62, #63, #64, #65, #66, #67, #68, #69, #70, #71, #72, #73 and #74) who resided on the East Unit out of the 112 residents at the facility. The facility census was 112. Finding include: Observation of the East Unit crash cart on [DATE] at 7:45 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #56, revealed there was a suction machine sitting on top of the crash cart; however, there was no suction collection canister in place or located in the crash cart. There was also no backboard on the crash cart. Review of the Emergency Crash Cart Checklist for [DATE] at the same time, revealed all dates were blank, indicating the crash cart had not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the high temperature dishwashing machine sanitized at the proper temperature. This failure had the potential to affect 85 of 88 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings included: During an interview on 07/08/24 at 8:48 A.M., the Dietary Director (DD) stated the dishwashing machine rinse temperature should be 180 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The DD stated she thought the thermostat was broken. During an interview on 07/09/24 at 8:12 A.M., Dietary Aide (DA) #15 stated she had checked the dishwashing machine temperature on the morning of 07/08/24, and the temperature reached 190 degrees F. DA #15 stated, as far as she knew, the dishwashing machine thermostat worked correctly. During an interview on 07/09/24 at 10:04 A.M., the Service Technician, from the dishwashing machine company, indicated there were two thermostats on the dishwashing machine. He stated one thermostat indicated the rinse tank temperature and another thermostat that was toward the back left of the dishwashing machine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection control program to prevent the transmission/development of infection for three (Resident #139, Resident #37, and Resident #5) of seven residents reviewed for infection control. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that staff implemented Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for Resident #37 and #139 and failed to appropriately handle dirty linens and store respiratory equipment properly for Resident #5. Findings include: 1. Medical record review indicated the facility admitted Resident #139 on 06/21/24. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of sepsis, chronic kidney disease, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date of 06/28/24, revealed Resident #139 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. The MDS indicated the resident was dependent on staff for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-30 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #37) of six residents who required tube feedings received enteral nutrition in a manner that minimized the risk of complications. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #37's enteral nutrition (tube feeding) formula was labeled with the date and time the infusion began. Findings included: Medical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident #37 on [DATE]. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of persistent vegetative state, anoxic brain damage, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, and gastrostomy status. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE], revealed Resident #37 was in a persistent vegetative state with no discernable consciousness. The MDS indicated Resident #37 had a feeding tube for nutrition and received 51 percent (%) or more of their calories through tube…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to obtain laboratory services ordered by the physician for one (Resident #74) of five residents reviewed for urinary catheter/urinary tract infection. Findings include: Medical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident #74 on 03/22/24. According to the admission Record, Resident #74 had a medical history that included diagnoses of person injured in a traffic collision, fracture of the left femur, fracture of the right femur, multiple fractures of ribs, contusion of the lungs bilaterally, urge incontinence, and a closed fracture of the right lower leg. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/29/24, revealed Resident #74 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. The MDS indicated Resident #74 required set up or clean-up assistance from staff with eating. According to the MDS, Resident #74 had an indwelling urinary catheter. The MDS revealed the resident had no active…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-30 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow the planned menu for the pureed diet for one (Resident #54) of seven residents who received pureed diets. Findings include: Medical record review indicated the facility admitted Resident #54 on 05/17/24. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of dementia. Resident #54's Order Summary Report, with active orders as of 07/11/24, revealed an order with a start date of 07/06/24 for a regular diet pureed texture. Review of the Puree diet Week at a glance document revealed the facility lunch menu for 07/09/24 that indicated a planned menu for the pureed diet included Pureed 2-#8 [two four ounce or two 1/2 cups] scoop [NAME] Marzetti [a baked pasta, meat, and cheese casserole dish] (1 Cup). An observation of the lunch meal service on 07/09/24 at 11:07 A.M., revealed Resident #54, who was on a pureed diet, was served one #8 scoop of pureed [NAME] Marzetti or one half of the required serving. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, review of facility documentation, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse to the state agency. This affected one (Resident #137) of three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Medical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident #137 on 07/01/22. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke), schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, tobacco use, depression, generalized anxiety disorder, hemiplegia (paralysis or weakness) affecting the left nondominant side, need for assistance with personal care, and unsteadiness on feet. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/02/24, revealed Resident #137 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. A police report dated 04/09/24 revealed at approximately 1:03 P.M. on 04/09/24, a police officer was dispatched to the facility in response to a Morals/Sex Offenses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, a review of a police report, review of facility documentation, and policy review, the facility failed to have evidence that an allegation of abuse was thoroughly investigated for one (Resident #137) of three residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, Resident #137 alleged Family Member (FM) #16 sexually abused the resident on 04/09/24. The facility failed to have documented evidence they reviewed facility video [NAME] footage from the time of the incident; failed to have documented evidence they interviewed/obtained statements from the resident, the alleged perpetrator, witnesses, and staff who worked closely with Resident #137; and failed to determine whether abuse was substantiated. Findings included: Medical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident #137 on 07/01/22. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke), schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, tobacco use,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-29 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, review of facility investigation, review of Self-Reported Incident (SRI), review of police report, staff interview, review of personnel files, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of property. This affected one (#41) out of three residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 04/17/24. Diagnoses included aphasia following cerebral infarction, ischemic cardiomyopathy, peripheral vascular disease, and chronic kidney disease stage three. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/24/24, revealed Resident #41 had moderately impaired cognition. Review of the SRI dated 04/29/24 revealed Resident #41's family reported to the facility that Resident #41's debit card was missing. Resident #41's family provided the facility with bank statements, which showed several transactions that were not made by Resident #41. The SRI indicated the facility's investigation revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-08-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain the ice machine in a manner to protect against the spread of food borne illness. This had the potential to affect all 90 residents in the facility. The facility census was 90. Findings include: Observation on 07/26/21 at 8:50 A.M., revealed the ice machine in the kitchen with a plastic bag loosely covering the opening. Ice was observed through the loosely covered opening. The lid to the ice machine was observed on the floor beside the ice machine. There was a cart containing dirty dishes approximately 2 feet away from the ice machine. Interview on 07/26/21 at 8:50 A.M., with the Dietary Manager (DM) #17 stated the lid had been in need of repair since the week prior and verified the opening to the ice machine was not secure, ice was visible through the sides of the plastic bag, and the cart containing dirty dishes in close range of the ice machine.
- Potential for harm · E2021-08-04 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — patternHonor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident, visitor and staff interviews, review of facility policy, and review on online resources per the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) nursing home memos, the facility failed to permit resident visitation at the time of their choosing and provide privacy for visits. This affected four(#54, #68, #79 and #31) of four residents reviewed for visitation practices. The census was 90. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 08/22/17, with a diagnosis of unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/21/21, revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of one staff with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the care plan for Resident #54 dated 03/13/20 revealed the resident was at risk for psychosocial well-being concern related to medically imposed restrictions related to COVID-19 precautions.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-08-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure care plans were updated or revised for residents residing on the secured unit. This affected six (#8, #22, #50, #54, #68 and #85) of 37 sampled residents. The facility identified thirty residents who reside on the secured unit. The facility census was 90. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 12/09/20, with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment and requires supervision with locomotion on unit. Further review of the medical record revealed a Wander Risk assessment dated [DATE], that revealed the resident was at moderate risk for wandering/elopement. Review of the resident's medical record failed to provide a plan of care addressing the resident's need to be placed on the secured unit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interview, and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure expired house stock insulin was discarded. The facility failed to ensure topical medication was stored separately from oral inhalers. This had the potential to affect seven (#5, #19, #33, #35, #64, #80, #339) insulin-dependent residents on the Central Unit. This affected one (#9) of one resident receiving topical ointments. The census was 90. Findings include: 1. Observation on [DATE] at 1:15 P.M., of the Central Unit medication room,with Registered Nurse (RN) #27 revealed there was a house stock vial of insulin unopened with an expiration date of [DATE] being stored with the house stock medications. Interview on [DATE] at 1:15 P.M., with RN #27 confirmed the house stock insulin was expired and should have been discarded. Review of the facility list of residents on the central unit revealed seven (#5, #19, #33, #35, #64, #80, #339) insulin dependent residents. Review of the facility policy titled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-04 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to have the required information on discharged notices. This affected two (#1 and #19) of four reviewed for hospitalizations. The census was 90. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/17/19. Diagnoses listed included major depressive disorder, osteogenesis imperfecta, cerebral infarction, hypertension, sickle-cell disease, anxiety disorder, and hyperlipidemia. Further review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was discharged to a local hospital on [DATE] for chest and lung pain. Review of a facility document titled Notice of Hospital Transfer or Therapeutic Leave dated 05/26/21, revealed the form did not contain the reason for discharge, a state of the resident's rights to appeal, or the Office of the State Long Term Ombudsman information. 2. Review of the medical record of Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 08/16/19 and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure dependent residents were provided with adequate nail care. This affected one (#68) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility identified 62 residents dependent on staff assistance with ADLs. The census was 90. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #68 revealed an admission date of 02/27/21, with a diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease and unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #68 dated 06/18/21 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of one staff with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the care plan for Resident #68 dated 02/27/21 revealed the resident had impaired ADL function related to impaired memory, confusion, impaired mobility/balance, potential to be in pain, and current health status. Goal of care plan was for resident to have ADL needs met with staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure wounds were provided treatments as ordered and regularly assessed. This affected one (#78) of four residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 90. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #78 revealed an admission date of 06/18/21 and a diagnosis of peripheral vascular disease (PVD). Review of admission nurses note for Resident #78 dated 06/18/21 revealed resident was admitted to the facility from the hospital with multiple wounds to bilateral lower extremities. Review of admission nursing assessment for Resident #78 dated 06/18/21 revealed resident had multiple gangrenous areas to bilateral lower extremities and a stage four pressure area to his sacrum. Review of the assessment revealed there was no further description of resident's wounds. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #78 dated 07/04/21 revealed resident was cognitively impaired and required extensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy the facility failed to regularly assess pressure sores, obtain physician orders for new developed pressure sores and apply pressure relieving devices This affected three (#78, #68 and #41) of four residents reviewed for wound care. The census was 90. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #78 revealed an admission date of 06/18/21 and a diagnosis of peripheral vascular disease (PVD). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #78 dated 07/04/21 revealed resident was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of one to two staff with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of admission nurses note for Resident #78 dated 06/18/21 revealed resident was admitted to the facility from the hospital with a stage four pressure ulcer to the sacrum. Review of admission nursing assessment for Resident #78 dated 06/18/21 revealed resident had multiple gangrenous areas to bilateral lower extremities and a stage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-04 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide treatment of physician ordered splint devices to maintain range of motion and prevent contractures. This affected one (#41) of three residents reviewed for limited range of motion. The facility identified 26 residents residing in the facility with contractures. The facility census was 90. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 01/08/15. Diagnoses included malignant neuroleptic syndrome, cerebral infarction, ST Elevation (SEMI) myocardial infarction, essential hypertension, gastro-esophageal reflux, COVID-19, persistent vegetative state, tracheostomy status, gastrostomy status, anoxic brain damage, anxiety disorder, and severe hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. The resident required total dependence of two staff for bed mobility, transfers,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observations, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were in place and environmental hazards were not present in a room for a resident assessed at risk for falls. This affected two (#68 and #8) of seven residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. The census was 90. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #68 revealed an admission date of 02/27/21, with a diagnosis of unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #68 dated 06/18/21, revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of one staff with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the fall risk assessment for Resident #68 dated 06/30/21 revealed the resident was at risk for falls. Review of the care plan for Resident #68 dated 10/09/19 revealed the resident was at risk for falls and fall related injury related to impaired mobility/balance, incontinence, potential to be in pain,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, observation, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care for a resident and ensure a resident with a nephrostomy tube was provided care and treatment per physician orders. This affected two (#15 and #19) of three reviewed for care and treatment of bladder and bowel. The census was 90. Findings include: Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/07/16. Diagnoses listed included peripheral vascular disease, major depressive disorder, disorder of thyroid, atrial flutter, hyperlipidemia, anxiety disorder, chronic pain syndrome, diabetic polyneuropathy, and type II diabetes mellitus. Resident #15 was assessed as being cognitively intact, requiring extensive assistance of one for activities of daily living (ADLs) in a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]. Review of Resident #15's care plan revealed she has an alteration in bladder elimination/incontinence. Resident #15 wears…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-08-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per physician orders. This affected two (#15 and #20) of six resident medical records reviewed for pharmacy. The facility census was 90. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/07/16. Diagnoses listed included peripheral vascular disease, major depressive disorder, disorder of thyroid, atrial flutter, hyperlipidemia, anxiety disorder, chronic pain syndrome, diabetic polyneuropathy, and type II diabetes mellitus. Resident #15 was assessed as being cognitively intact, requiring extensive assistance of one for activities of daily living (ADLs) in a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]. Further review revealed physician orders: dated 03/31/18 for aspirin enteric coated 81 milligrams (mg) one tablet (PO) by mouth daily, an order dated 07/16/18 for atorvastin calcium 10 mg PO daily, and an order dated 03/03/20 Celexa 10 mg PO…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-08-04 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the medical record of Resident #05 revealed an admission date of 10/17/20. Diagnoses included muscle weakness, type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, morbid obesity, essential hypertension, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, major depressive disorder, COVID-19, polyneuropathy, gastroesophageal reflux, and sleep apnea. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of the physician's orders revealed an order dated 06/11/21 for hydroxyzine hcl tablet 25 milligrams (mg) as needed (PRN) every 8 hours for anxiety. Review of the pharmacy medical record review dated 06/24/21 revealed a notification of the order for hydroxyzine PRN required a 14-day stop with an in-person physician evaluation prior to re-ordering the medication. Recommendations were made to review the PRN order and indicate the length of therapy for the order. Below the pharmacy recommendations, the box indicating disagreement was checked and was signed by a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-08-04 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure gradual dosage reductions were attempted for residents receiving psychotropic medications and failed to ensure antipsychotic medications were given for an appropriate indication. This affected three (#54, #68 and #15) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility identified 23 residents with orders for antipsychotic medications. The facility census was 90. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 08/22/17 with a diagnosis of unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #54 dated 07/12/21 revealed resident was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of one staff with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the care plan for Resident #54 dated 06/16/19 revealed the resident had a behavior problem including wandering and an instance of physical aggression on 06/16/19.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure staff practiced appropriate hand hygiene during medication administration. This affected one (#31) of five residents observed for medication administration. The census was 90. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #31 was admitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #31 date 05/21/21 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required supervision with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the July 2021 physician orders for Resident #31 revealed an order dated 07/24/20 for potassium chloride tablets by mouth every morning. Observation on 07/28/21 at 9:03 A.M., revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #30 broke potassium chloride tablets with her bare hands and placed them in a cup with applesauce for administration. Interview on 07/28/21 at 9:03 A.M. with LPN #30 confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-04-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facilities water management program, observations, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to properly sanitize the blood glucose monitoring system between resident use. This affected one (#282) of two resident using the glucometer during medication administration. The facility identified ten resident who use the glucometer from the west medication cart. Additionally, the facility failed to implement a water management program for the prevention and spread of Legionella. This had the potential to affect all 86 resident who reside at the facility. The census was 86. Findings include: 1. Observation on 04/01/19 at 5:30 P.M. of licensed practical nurse (LPN) #353 revealed the LPN used the blood glucose meter to check the blood glucose level for Resident #22. After completing the check for Resident #22, LPN #353 returned to the medication cart and cleansed the glucose meter with an alcohol prep pad. LPN #353 then picked up the glucometer, walked to the room of Resident #282, and used the glucose meter to assess Resident #282's blood glucose level.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-04-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medication storage area observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to properly label and store medications. Additionally, the facility failed to adequately secure narcotic medication. This affected one (#26) resident medication that was expired, one medications with no residents identification information or prescription label, and one multi-use vial of medication that was opened and undated located in two (central one medication cart and east one medication cart) of five medication storage areas observed. The census was 86. Findings include: 1. Observation on 04/04/19 at 1:19 P.M. of the central one medication cart revealed basaglar insulin pen 100 units/milliliter prescribed to Resident #26 was opened on 03/06/19. Review of the insulin pen package revealed the medication expired 28 days after opening. Interview on 04/04/19 at 1:20 P.M. with licensed practical nurse (LPN) #335 verified the basaglar insulin pen prescribed to Resident #26 and located in the central one medication cart was expired. 2. Observation and interview on 04/04/19 at 1:36 P.M. of the east…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-04-04 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure advanced directives being stored in the hard chart and electronic health record (EHR) were consistent. This affected one (#32) of 24 residents reviewed for consistency of advanced directives. The census was 86. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include dysphagia, dementia with behavioral disturbances, hypertension, neoplasm of digestive system, major depressive disorder, vascular dementia, diabetes mellitus type two, chronic pain syndrome, affective mood disorder, chronic kidney disease, osteoarthritis, psychosis, weakness, edema, and left upper extremity flexion contractures in the elbow, wrist and hand. Review of the Resident #32's care plan dated 11/16/16, revealed the resident had advanced directives in place which included do not resuscitate comfort care (DNRCC). Interventions included the doctor, physician assistant or nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, family, nurse practitioner and staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to notify resident representatives and/or the provider of a change in a resident's status or refusals of care. This affected three Residents (#36, #51, and #77) of three residents reviewed for notification of changes. The facility census was 86. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #77's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/30/17 with diagnoses that included dementia with behavioral disturbance, insomnia, osteoarthritis, malignant neoplasm of breast, anemia, and mood disorder. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated revealed Resident #77 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of physician orders dated 04/17/18 revealed Seroquel (antipsychotic) was ordered 50 milligrams (mg) by mouth every 12 hours. Review of physician orders dated 04/13/18 revealed Seroquel 25 mg by mouth at bedtime was discontinued for gradual dose reduction. Review of physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-04 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide written transfer notification to one (#84) resident when they were hospitalized and failed to notify the Ombudsman of the transfer. This affected one (#84) of one residents reviewed for hospitalization and had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 86. Findings include: Review of Resident #84's medical record indicated an admission date of 12/27/18. Diagnoses included gastrointestinal hemorrhage, unsteadiness on feet, type two diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, convulsions, anemia, anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. A Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #84 had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making and required extensive assist of two for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, dressing and personal hygiene. The medical record indicated Resident #84 was transferred and admitted to the hospital on [DATE] after a fall. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-04-04 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to issue written notice of the bed hold policy when a resident was transferred to the hospital. This affected one (#84) of one residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The total facility census was 86. Findings include: Review of Resident #84's medical record indicated an admission date of 12/27/18. Diagnoses included gastrointestinal hemorrhage, unsteadiness on feet, type two diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, convulsions, anemia, anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. A Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #84 had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making and required extensive assist of two for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, dressing and personal hygiene. The medical record indicated Resident # 84 was transferred and admitted to the hospital on [DATE] after a fall. The record revealed the record had no evidence the resident or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-04-04 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure minimum data set (MDS) assessments were accurate. This affected one (#32) of 20 resident reviewed for accuracy of the MDS assessment. The census was 86. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include dysphagia, dementia with behavioral disturbances, hypertension, neoplasm of digestive system, major depressive disorder, vascular dementia, diabetes mellitus type two, chronic pain syndrome, affective mood disorder, chronic kidney disease, osteoarthritis, psychosis, weakness, edema, and left upper extremity flexion contractures in the elbow, wrist and hand. Review of occupational therapy progress notes certification period 10/21/18 through 01/09/19, revealed Resident #32 was assessed to have left elbow, hand, and wrist contractures. Documentation revealed Resident #32 had limited range of motion to the left upper extremity. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-04-04 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, and review of policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure 48 hours baseline care plan were completed and failed to ensure a copy was provide to the resident/resident representative as required. This affected three Residents (#4, #59 and #60) out of nine residents in the investigative sample. The facility census was 86. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 02/21/19 with diagnosis including muscle weakness, type two diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, low back pain, congestive heart failure and hypertension. Review of nursing evaluation completed 02/21/19 lacked any documentation of a baseline care plan. Review of comprehensive care plan documented On 02/25/19 was the date of the Resident #60 care plan development was initiated for a nutritional risk. Further review lacked any documentation of the formulation of a 48 hour baseline care plan. Review of care conference summary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and nurse practitioner interview and policy review, the facility failed to obtain blood work as ordered for one resident which resulted in a delay in treatment. This affected one (#51) of five residents reviewed for medications. The census was 86. Findings include: Review of Resident # 51's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE]. Diagnoses included peripheral vascular disease, major depressive disorder, thyroid disorder, atrial flutter, hyperlipidemia, right below the knee amputation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypothyroidism, and type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy. The resident's annual minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident had mild or no cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance with activities of daily including bed mobility, dressing, toileting and hygiene. The physician orders included a comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) monthly. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-04 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a physician ordered splint device was available for resident use. This affected one (#32) of one resident reviewed for limited range of motion. The census was 86. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include dysphagia, dementia with behavioral disturbances, hypertension, neoplasm of digestive system, major depressive disorder, vascular dementia, diabetes mellitus type two, chronic pain syndrome, affective mood disorder, chronic kidney disease, osteoarthritis, psychosis, weakness, edema, and left upper extremity flexion contractures in the elbow, wrist and hand. Review of the care plan dated initiated 05/31/17, revealed Resident #32 required a restorative program for splinting. The intervention included apply splint to left elbow as tolerated. Review of occupational therapy progress notes certification period 10/21/18…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to investigate one resident's fall with injury to identify contributing factors to possible prevent future falls. This affected one (#36) of two residents review for accidents. The census was 86. Findings include: Review of Resident #36's medical record review indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnosis included Alzheimer's disease, cerebral arthrosclerosis, major depression, type two diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, anxiety and schizoaffective disorder. The resident's minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment and required limited assistance with activities of daily including ambulation, locomotion and extensive assistance with transfers, dressing, eating, toileting and hygiene. The resident's care plan dated 05/23/18 indicated the resident was at risk for falls and fall related injury. Review of Resident #36's progress notes indicated on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-04 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to implement a fluid restriction as recommended for a dialysis resident. This affected one (#182) out one resident review for dialysis care. The facility identified two residents currently residing in the facility who receive dialysis treatments. The census was 86. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #182 revealed an admission date of 03/28/19 with diagnosis including hypertension, type two diabetes, hyperparathyroidism, anemia related to chronic kidney disease, Rheumatic mitral stenosis insufficiency and end stage renal disease. Review of hospital documentation dated 03/11/19 documented a Registered Dietician assessed Resident #182 and his current diet order consisted of mechanical altered diet with thins liquids and a 1,500 milliliters (ml) fluid restriction Review of the facility's hospital discharge report sheet dated 03/28/19 documented Resident #182 was identified as a dialysis resident.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-04-04 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from unnecessary medications regarding prescribing antibiotics for the appropriate signs and symptoms of infection. This affected one (#48) of five resident reviewed for unnecessary medication. The census was 86. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include dementia with behavioral disturbances, hypothyroidism, hypertension, insomnia, diabetes mellitus, psychosis, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of a progress note dated 03/26/19 at 9:11 A.M. revealed Resident #48 was assessed by the nurse practitioner and noted to have a hard raised area on the left forearm. Documentation revealed an order was given for antibiotic therapy for three days. Continued review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed no other assessment information to describe symptoms related to the hard raised area on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-04 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered laboratory tests were completed. This affected one (#48) of five resident reviewed for unnecessary medication. The census was 86. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include dementia with behavioral disturbances, hypothyroidism, hypertension, insomnia, diabetes mellitus, psychosis, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of a physician order dated 01/09/19 revealed Resident #48 was ordered the laboratory tests complete blood count (CBC), basic metabolic panel (BMP), hemoglobin A1c (HgbA1c) and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) to be completed every six months starting on the fifteenth for hypothyroid, anemia, and diabetes mellitus type two. Review of Resident #48's medical record revealed no evidence the laboratory tests CBC, BMP, HgbA1c and TSH were completed during the months of 01/19, 02/19, 03/19, or 04/19. Interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-04-04 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and resident representative and staff interview, the facility failed to provide routine dental services. This affected one (#35) of one resident reviewed for dental services. The census was 86. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include dementia without behavioral disturbances, hypothyroidism, anxiety, hypertension, diabetes mellitus type two, amnesia, and heart failure. Review of the care plan dated 03/24/19 revealed Resident #35 had dentures. The resident required assistance with oral care and wore full upper and lower dentures. Resident #35 was to consult with a dentist for assessment and treatment of oral health. Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed no evidence of routine dental services offered to the resident. There was no documentation of consent or refusal for dentistry services. Interview on 04/01/19 at 6:15 P.M. with Resident #35's representative revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-04-04 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed implement their antibiotic stewardship protocols to ensure appropriate antibiotic use. This affected one (#48) of three resident's reviewed for antibiotic use. The census was 86. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include dementia with behavioral disturbances, hypothyroidism, hypertension, insomnia, diabetes mellitus, psychosis, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of a progress note dated 03/2619 at 9:11 A.M. revealed Resident #48 was assessed by the nurse practitioner and noted to have a hard raised area on the left forearm. Documentation revealed an order was given for antibiotic therapy for three days. Continued review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed no other assessment information to describe symptoms related to the hard raised area on the resident's left forearm. Review of the physician's orders dated 03/26/18…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$75,572 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $10,358 — penalty dated 2025-01-22
- $55,896 — penalty dated 2024-07-30
- $9,318 — penalty dated 2024-01-31
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-02-18 for 28 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KETTERING HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 12/31/2023 |
| KETTERING OPCO | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 81% | since 12/31/2023 |
| SHAPIRO, NAFTALI | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 19% | since 12/31/2023 |
| KETTERING MANAGEMENT | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/09/2025 |
| HUNTER, ROBERT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/31/2023 |
| MADDIX, SARAH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/31/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365321. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-07-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.