Ashtabula County Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 212 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 59.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 97 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 133 beds and averages 113.5 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.88 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.00 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2018-10-23 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital records, interview with facility staff, review of laboratory testing results, review of the facility policy titled Anticoagulation Clinical Protocol and review of the Nursing Drug Handbook, 38th Edition, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring was completed for one resident (Resident #6) who received the oral anticoagulant (blood thinning) medication, Coumadin. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy when the blood clotting time was not monitored. Actual Harm occurred to Resident #6 on 08/28/18 when the resident was transported to the local emergency room with upper extremity bruising and bleeding evidenced by blood in the urine (indicators of possible increased bleeding due to the Coumadin medication) and was admitted to the hospital with retroperitoneal bleed and perinephric bleed. The resident's International Normalized Ratio (INR) level (blood testing used to monitor therapeutic levels of the medication Coumadin) was significantly elevated with a level…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY.Based on observation, medical record review, review of a facility investigation, hospital records, facility policy, manufacturer's instructions, and interview, the facility failed to identify and implement comprehensive, individualized and adequate fall interventions to prevent a fall with injury during resident care. This affected one resident (#77) of three residents reviewed for accidents/incidents who required use of a shower gurney. The facility identified 32 residents (#3, #5, #11, #12, #21, #25, #27, #28, #29, #30, #33, #37, #41, #42, #43, #58, #59, #61, #62, #67, #77, #79, #81, #87, #89, #93, #94, #101, #103, #104, #112 and #114) who required a shower gurney for bathing. The facility census was 115. Actual Harm occurred on 01/11/26 at 3:00 P.M. when Resident #77, who was dependent on staff for showers and transfers and required substantial to maximum assistance with rolling left and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2019-12-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure timely assessments were completed and adequate interventions were implemented to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer for Resident #94. Actual Harm occurred on 10/29/19 when Resident #94, who was quadriplegic and required extensive assistance to total dependence on staff for activity of daily living care, including bed mobility and transfers developed an unstageable/Stage IV (full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle, slough or eschar may be present on some parts of the wound bed, often include undermining and tunneling) pressure ulcer to the coccyx. This affected one resident (#94) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility identified eight current residents with pressure ulcers. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including quadriplegia, neurogenic bowel, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder and diabetes mellitus…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2018-10-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure adequate assistance was provided to Resident #64 and Resident #74 to prevent falls. Actual harm occurred on 05/03/18 at 11:15 A.M. when Resident #64, assessed as requiring supervision with bathing, was left unattended by State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #626 in the shower room and fell to the floor while reaching for his clothing. The resident sustained an injury to his arm which subsequently became infected, requiring hospitalization and surgical intervention. The resident also reported difficulty with using his arm following the incident. Actual harm occurred on 06/11/18 when Resident #74, assessed as requiring two staff for bed mobility and toileting, rolled out of bed sustaining a facial contusion and emergent hospital visit, while being provided care by only one STNA. This affected two residents (Resident #64 and #74) of four residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #64 was admitted to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-04 · tag F0624 — isolated
  Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #115's guardian was informed and gave consent for Resident #115 to be discharged from the facility. This affected one resident ( Resident # 115) of the three residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 114. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #115 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 08/12/24. Guardian #392 was listed as the responsible party guardian and emergency contact #1. Resident #115's mother was the emergency contact #2. Medical diagnoses included pulmonary edema, Asperger's syndrome, diabetes, bipolar, hypertension, glaucoma, dependence on renal dialysis, depression, and anemia. Review of the Minimum Data Set ( MDS) 3.0 Discharge Return Not Anticipated assessment dated [DATE] revealed discharge was unplanned to home. Resident #115 had moderate impairment for decision making. Resident #115 displayed physical behaviors. Resident #115 needed set up…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-08-31 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure all meals were served at an appetizing temperature. This had the potential to affect 108 residents at the facility. The facility identified one resident (#30) as receiving no food from the kitchen. The facility census was 109. Findings include: On 08/30/23 at 11:34 A.M. observation of temperatures taken on the tray line revealed the roast turkey measured an internal temperature of 170 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The Brussel sprouts measured an internal temperature of 148 degrees F, and the scalloped corn measured an internal temperature of 160 degrees F. On 08/30/23 at 12:04 P.M. the food cart with the test tray left the kitchen. On 08/30/23 at 12:06 P.M. the cart was on the unit. On 08/30/23 at 12:07 P.M. two staff members started passing the food trays. On 08/30/23 at 12:26 P.M. all resident trays had been passed and the food on the test tray was evaluated. Review of the test tray with Assistant Dietary Manager (ADM) #759 revealed the tray consisted of roast turkey, Brussel sprouts, and scalloped corn. The turkey…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-05 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to accurately code alarms on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment for Resident #29, Resident #63, Resident #96 and Resident #99. This affected four residents (#29, #63, #96 and #99) of four residents reviewed for alarms. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #99 revealed an admission to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #99's current diagnoses included unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, generalized osteoarthritis, and primary hypertension. A fall risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #99 was a high risk of falls. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #99 revealed an order, dated 10/30/19 for motion [NAME] alarm for bathroom, an order dated 09/22/19 for self releasing alarm belt to wheelchair, a motion [NAME] to the residents bed, and an order for bed tender alarm dated 06/05/18. A care plan relative to fall risk revealed individualized interventions for falls…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to maintain adequate infection control practices during the administration of medication for Resident #62 and during meal services to prevent the spread of infection. This affected one resident (#62) of six residents observed during medication administration and six residents (#10, #27, #63, #73, #85 and #87) of ten residents observed for meal service. Findings include: 1. During medication observation on 12/03/19 at 7:19 A.M. Licensed Practical Nurse LPN #610 entered Resident #62's room to obtain a glucometer reading. LPN #610 entered the resident's room, washed her hands, applied gloves and then completed the blood sugar testing. After completing the test, the LPN discarded the items in the appropriate container, removed her gloves and then returned to the medication cart without first performing any hand washing or hand hygiene. The LPN then cleaned the glucometer with a sanitizing wipe and obtained the resident's Lantus Solostar KwikPen from the medication drawer and prepared it for administration. LPN #610…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2019-12-05 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #49 was free from misappropriation of money. This affected one resident (#49) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #49 revealed an admission date of 03/01/17 with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease, congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease and major depression. Review of the form titled, Resident Personal Funds revealed Resident #49 signed on 03/22/17 that she authorized the facility to manage her personal money while she was a resident at the facility. Review of a facility self-reported incident (SRI), tracking number 180181 revealed an incident involving misappropriation for Resident #49 was discovered on 09/08/19. The SRI revealed on 09/02/19 State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #600 asked Resident #49 if she would like to have her coin purse locked up rather than leave her money in her room. Resident #49 agreed and STNA #600 took Resident #49's coin purse that contained $38.00 to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2019-12-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #62, who had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus received insulin injections in accordance with the physician's order for administration and to meet the resident's needs. This affected one resident (#62) of six residents observed for medication administration. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #62 revealed an admission date of 03/02/18 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus type 2, dementia and chronic kidney disease. Record review revealed the resident had a physician's order, dated 09/18/19 for NovoFine Lantus Solostar KwikPen Insulin Needles, inject one applicator subcutaneously every morning and at bedtime. The order included to rotate sites, use arms not abdomen for injection. During medication administration observation on 12/03/19 at 7:42 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #610 entered Resident #62's room with the prepared Lantus Solostar Kwikpen and exposed the resident's abdomen which revealed two small blue, red, and purple colored bruises to the right…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2019-12-05 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure medications were administered to Resident #59 via gastrostomy tube to decrease the risk of stomach upset/gastrointestinal disturbance. This affected one resident (#59) six residents observed for medication administration. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #59 revealed an admission date of 06/23/04 with diagnoses including heart failure, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, gastrostomy status and chronic bronchitis. Review of the physician's orders, dated 06/27/19 revealed the resident had an order for Potassium chloride solution 20 milliequivalents (meq) per 15 milliliters (ml) 10 percent (%) solution, give 7.5 ml via gastrostomy tube once daily for heart failure. During medication administration observation on 12/03/19 at 9:38 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #610 prepared the Potassium chloride solution 10% 7.5 ml into a medication administration cup. Observation of the Potassium Chloride medication label revealed a note that stated, must dilute before using. Interview at the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2018-10-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure comprehensive nutritional assessments were completed and/or timely and adequate nutritional interventions were implemented to prevent weight loss. This affected six residents (Resident #269, #46, #57, #10, #79 and #70) of six residents reviewed for weight loss. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #70's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), cognitive communication deficit, dysphasia, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. The resident was ventilator dependent and received nutrition/hydration via a gastrostomy tube. Review of the admission nursing assessment identified Resident #70 was admitted with a weight of 166 pounds. The resident's height was six feet. Review of the 14-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 09/24/18 revealed the resident had intact…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2018-10-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure care provided to residents was provided in a dignified manner related to agency staff listening to music on their phones while responsible for resident care and failed to ensure Resident #42's urinary catheter drainage bag was properly covered to promote dignity for the resident. This affected two residents (Resident #42 and Resident #66) of 116 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Interview with Resident #66 during a resident group meeting on 10/16/18 at 12:58 P.M. revealed concerns with agency staff entering her room to provide care while listening to music on their phones. The resident stated this concern had been shared with facility staff during previous resident council group meetings held at the facility. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #701 on 10/17/18 at 10:56 A.M. revealed she had occasionally seen agency staff listening to personal music while providing care to residents. LPN #701 indicated the last time she saw it occur was earlier that morning. She stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2018-10-23 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the Ombudsman's office was notified when Resident #6 and Resident #19 were discharged to the hospital. This affected two residents (Resident #6 and #19) of two residents reviewed for transfer/hospitalization. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and transferred to the hospital for an acute illness on 08/28/18. Resident #6 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #6's medical record contained no evidence the Ombudsman's office was notified of the transfer to the hospital. An interview was conducted on 10/19/18 at 1:51 P.M. with Ombudsman #800 who revealed that neither she nor the Ombudsman's office received any notification that Resident #6 had been transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. An interview was conducted on 10/19/18 with the Administrator and Corporate Consultant #40 who verified that there was currently no system in place to notify the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$13,870 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $13,870 — penalty dated 2026-02-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $101K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH