Crestmont North Nursing Home
13330 Detroit Ave, Lakewood, OH 44107 · For profit - Individual · 71 certified beds · (216) 228-9550 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Jun 2026
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0569)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.4% | 5.3% | 15.4% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.4% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 64.0% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.3% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.1% | 6.1% | 16.1% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.6% | 25.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.1% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 11.7% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.6% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 75.6% | 79.4% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 71 beds and averages 58.4 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.28 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.84 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.45 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
40 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident that care plan meetings were held quarterly as required. This affected three (Residents #23, #48, and #66) of three residents reviewed for care plan meetings. The facility census was 62.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #66 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder-bipolar type, anxiety disorder, alcohol dependence, and dementia with mood disorder. The resident was discharged on 03/25/26.Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] showed Resident #66 had severely impaired cognition, no behaviors, and required total staff assistance for bed mobility and transfersReview of the Care Conference Forms, notes, and emails showed care conferences were held on 07/17/25, 01/23/26, 02/03/26, and 03/10/26. There were no documented care conferences from admission until 07/17/25, nor between 07/17/25 and 01/23/26, as required.2. Review of the medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident with severe cognitive impairment was not permitted to sign financial documents. This affected one resident (Resident #66) out of three residents reviewed for protection and management of personal funds. The facility census was 62.Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #66 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder-bipolar type, anxiety disorder, alcohol dependence, and dementia with mood disturbance. The resident was discharged on 03/25/26.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] showed Resident #66 had severely impaired cognition.Review of guardianship documentation showed Resident #66 previously had a temporary guardian appointed from 10/01/18 through 02/10/19.Review of financial records showed Resident #66 signed an Authorization to Manage Resident Funds on 02/02/25. The resident later refused to sign trust account statements dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THIS IS AN INCIDENCE OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY.Based on Self-Reported Incident Review (SRI), facility timeline, and facility policy review, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident narcotic and anti-anxiety medications were not misappropriated. This finding affected three (Residents #26, #56 and #67) of four residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 62.Findings include: Review of the SRI Tracking #274552 dated 05/14/26 revealed a discovery of as needed doses of narcotic and anti-anxiety medications were missing. The SRI was unsubstantiated due to inconclusive evidence.Review of the undated facility investigation timeline revealed on 05/10/26 at approximately 11:30 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #848 discovered two oxycodone narcotic tablets had been removed from Resident #67's oxycodone narcotic medication administration card and replaced with loratadine antihistamine tablets and then taped over the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #66's skin was assessed per the physician's orders. This finding affected one (Resident #66) of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 62.Findings include: Review of Resident #66's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 03/25/26 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder-bipolar type, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and generalized anxiety.Review of Resident #66's physician orders revealed an order dated 01/14/25 (discontinued 03/27/26) for weekly skin assessments on shower days. Document under assessments every day shift on Tuesday and Friday.Review of Resident #66's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited severe cognitive impairment.Review of Resident #66's Weekly Skin Data Collection dated 01/09/26 revealed the resident had no new skin issues and a head-to-toe skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications for Resident #4 were administered as ordered. A total of 27 medications were administered with two medications omitted, for a total of 29 medication opportunities. Three medication errors were identified, resulting in a medication error rate of 10.34%. This deficiency affected one resident (Resident #4) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 62.Findings include: Review of Resident #4's medical record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, mild cognitive impairment, and anxiety disorder.Review of the physician orders for Resident #4 revealed the following active orders dated 10/10/23:-Aspirin 81 milligrams (mg) chewable tablet, administer one tablet by mouth once daily for hypertension.-Thiamine 50 mg, administer one tablet by mouth three times daily as a vitamin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-29 · tag F0569 — patternNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the residents were provided routine and timely notices when their resident's funds exceeded the Supplement Security Income (SSI) resource limit for one person. This affected four (Resident #17, #29, #31 and #47) of seven residents reviewed for personal funds. The facility census was 68. Findings Include: 1. Review of the Authorization to Manage Resident Funds dated 01/20/21 revealed Resident #47 authorized the facility to manage her money. Review of the spend-down notice dated 04/05/25 revealed Resident #47 had $9,060.24 in her account that needed to be spent down some of the money, so she did not exceed the limit, or it would have to be submitted to Medicaid. The spend down notice was signed by Resident #47 on 04/05/25. Review of the current account balance on 05/29/25 revealed Resident #47 had $10,987.24. Interview on 05/27/25 at 10:00 A.M. with Resident #47 stated she could not remember how much money she had in her account but was given a spend down notice by the facility. She stated she has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission dated [DATE]. Diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, dementia and severe morbid obesity. Review of the physician orders dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1's advance directive was Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care - Arrest (DNRCC-Arrest) (would receive standard medical care until experiencing a cardiac or respiratory arrest). The comprehensive care plan for Resident #1 dated [DATE] did not address Resident #1's advance directives. Review of the DNR Identification Form for Resident #1 revealed the top portion was filled out with Resident #1's name, address, birthday and signature of legal guardian. At the bottom of the form, the check box for Do-Not-Resuscitate Order (DNR) was checked stating my signature below constitutes and confirms a formal order to emergency medical series and other health care personnel that the person identified above is to be treated under the State of Ohio DNR protocol. At the bottom of the form revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were completed accurately to include fall interventions and behaviors exhibited by the resident. This affected two (Residents #9 and #58) of 21 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 68. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 07/10/19. Diagnoses included viral hepatitis, anxiety and arthritis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 was cognitively intact. Review of the fall investigation dated 02/12/25 revealed Resident #9 was lying on the floor by his bed and said he rolled off the bed and fell. A mattress was placed beside the bed to prevent future falls and was reported to have already been on 15 minute checks. Review of the care plan dated 05/20/25 revealed Resident #9 was at risk for falls. Interventions included ensuring his pathway was clear of clutter, 15 minute…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure falls were investigated thoroughly. This affected one (Resident #9) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 07/10/19. Diagnoses included viral hepatitis, anxiety and arthritis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 was cognitively intact and required partial to moderate assistance for toileting. Review of the care plan dated 01/01/25 revealed Resident #9 was at risk for falls due to muscle weakness and difficulty walking. Interventions included ensuring his pathway was clear of clutter, keeping his call bell within reach at all times, a perimeter mattress on the bed and non skid socks or shoes on at all times. A revision to the care plan on 03/13/25 revealed the resident was placed on 15 minute checks. There was no fall intervention to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 04/22/25. Diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of oropharynx (middle section of the pharynx/ throat) and hypotension. Review of undated care plan revealed Resident #23 was at risk for impaired gas exchange related to malignant neoplasm of the oropharynx requiring a tracheostomy. Intervention included ensure trach ties were always secured, give humidified oxygen as prescribed, observe for changes in level of consciousness, observe respiratory rate, depth, and quality, and suction as needed. The undated care plan revealed Resident #23 had alteration in cardiac status. Interventions included administer oxygen as ordered and monitor vitals as indicated. Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 had impaired cognition. He had a tracheostomy and had oxygen. Review of May 2025 physician orders for Resident #23 revealed his oxygen was to be at 35 percent with a two liter oxygen bleed per his trach collar.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 30 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Record review of Resident #26 revealed she was admitted to the facility 03/21/25. Diagnoses included PTSD. Her care plan identified potential for behaviors related to PTSD including accusatory behaviors, but did not clarify what caused the PTSD or potential triggers or situations to avoid. Review of her progress notes, care plan, assessments, and psychiatry service notes revealed no documentation of the cause, triggers, or ongoing effects of the PTSD. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 05/29/25 at 9:35 A.M. confirmed Resident #26's medical record did not contain an assessment for trauma informed care related to the resident's of PTSD and did not address the needs of the trauma survivor by minimizing triggers and/or re-traumatization. The DON said PTSD was managed with an outside counseling service who only provided their information on request alongside the facility psychiatric service. She said the surveyor would have to speak with Resident #26 to find out the source of her PTSD. Interview with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, staff interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #23 was free of significant medication errors. This affected one (#23) of five residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 04/22/25. Diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of oropharynx (middle section of the pharynx/ throat), rheumatoid arthritis, hypotension, and convulsions. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 had impaired cognition and had a PEG tube. Review of undated care plan revealed Resident #23 was at risk for aspiration related to tube feeding as he had a malignant neoplasm of the oropharynx. Interventions included check placement of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube prior to tube feedings, assess tube site daily for infection, flush PEG tube as ordered and notify physician of any changes.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review, facility policy review, and review of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to initiate and use enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for residents with indwelling medical devices during high contact resident care activities. The facility also failed to ensure staff followed infection control procedures during catheter care. This affected two (#12 and #23) of two residents reviewed for EBP and one (#12) of one resident reviewed for catheter care. The facility identified nine residents on EBP and two residents with catheters. The facility census was 68. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 04/22/25. Diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of oropharynx (middle section of the pharynx/ throat), rheumatoid arthritis, hypotension and convulsions. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 had impaired cognition and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were initiated for all resident care needs. This affected four residents (Resident #7, Resident #11, Resident #25, and Resident #48's) out of five residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility census was 56. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 09/12/20. Diagnosis included but not limited to cerebral infarction, vascular dementia, unspecified severity with other behavioral disturbance, unspecified psychosis not due to substance or known physiological condition, dementia with behavioral disturbance, hypertension, and difficulty walking. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #48 had intact cognition and always incontinent of bladder and bowel. Review of the laboratory results for urinalysis culture and sensitivity dated 08/26/24 revealed Resident #48 was positive for Escherichia Coli of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were revised to reflect new fall interventions. This affected three residents (Resident #7, Resident #25, and Resident #48) out of five residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 09/12/20. Diagnosis included but not limited to cerebral infarction, vascular dementia, unspecified severity with other behavioral disturbance, unspecified psychosis not due to substance or known physiological condition, dementia with behavioral disturbance, hypertension, and difficulty walking. Review of care plan dated 09/11/20 revealed Resident #48 had a fall on 10/31/24 and the care plan was not revised to reflect new interventions of non skid socks when out of bed to prevent falls. Interview on 11/26/24 at 8:49 A.M. with Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed care plans were not done correctly and fall interventions were not updated on the care plan. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were timely assessed for risk of falls to ensure appropriate interventions were in place to prevent falls. This affected three residents (Resident #11, Resident #21, and Resident #48) out of five residents reviewed for accident hazards. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 09/12/20. Diagnosis included but not limited to cerebral infarction, vascular dementia, unspecified severity with other behavioral disturbance, unspecified psychosis not due to substance or known physiological condition, dementia with behavioral disturbance, hypertension, and difficulty walking. Review of the falls risk assessment revealed Resident #48's latest fall risk assessments were completed on 10/02/24 and 10/31/24. Prior to 10/31/24 the resident was not assessed for falls since 03/08/21. Interview on 11/26/24 at 8:49 A.M. with Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed falls risk assessments were not being completed as required. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were administered medication per physician orders. This affected two residents (#7 and #48) out of three residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident ##7 revealed an admission date of 10/17/19. Diagnosis included but not limited to cerebral infarction, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance, type two diabetes, major depressive disorder, and seizures. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 had intact cognition. Review of the laboratory results for urinalysis culture and sensitivity dated 08/04/24 revealed Resident #7 was positive for Staphylococcus Haemolyticus of the urine and had a urinary tract infection (UTI). Review of the physician order dated 08/04/24 revealed an order for Macrobid (antibiotic) 100 milligrams (mg) every twelve (12) hours for five (5) days. Review of the medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen area in a clean and sanitary condition. This had the potential to affect 57 of 58 residents who resided in the facility. The facility identified one resident (#30) who did not receive food from the kitchen. Findings include: Observation during the tour of the kitchen with Assistant Dietary Manager #624 on 08/22/22 at 8:30 A.M. revealed the following: - An accumulation of dust on the evaporator fans hanging from the ceilings of both the walk in freezer and walk in refrigerator. There was so much dust on them you could see strings of dust blowing from the fans. Food items were stored in both of these areas. - Four sealed boxes (one each of broccoli, Brussel sprouts, oriental blend, and carrots) sitting on the floor of the walk-in freezer. - One undated and resealed bag of three breaded chicken patties; one undated and resealed bag of ten lasagna rolls; one undated and resealed half full bag of diced chicken; and one undated and resealed bag of eight country fried steak patties sitting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-08-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment for residents, employees and visitors. This affected all 58 residents in the facility. Findings include: General observations made on 08/22/22 at 9:15 A.M. revealed the carpeted hallways were significantly stained and worn. Observation of the smoking area on 08/22/22, 08/23/22 and 08/24/22 revealed two long wrought iron couches. One couch had no cushions. The other wrought iron couch had three discolored cushions. The cushions were lumpy and not flat. The smokers from the secured unit were observed being led to the designated smoking area. There were nine residents identified as smokers who resided on the secured unit (#11, #20, #27, #44, #48, #51, #54, #156 and #207). Four Residents (#20, #27, #54 and #156) were identified as ambulatory and would need a seat during smoking. Interview with Resident #26 on 08/22/22 at 12:08 P.M. reported his wheelchair was not cleaned. Observation of Resident #26's wheelchair at the time of the interview revealed the rungs under the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-25 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman was notified of facility initiated discharges. This affected 18 residents (Residents #18, #51, #206, #207, #208, #209, #210, #211, #212, #213, #214, #215, #216, #217, #218, #219, #220 and #221.) The census was 58. Findings include: Interview on 08/24/22 at 11:45 A.M. with Social Services (SS) #608 revealed the facility had not been notifying the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of facility-initiated discharges. SS #608 verified the last notification to the Ombudsman was on 02/02/21 for January 2021 facility discharges. Review of a facsimile transmittal report, dated 02/02/21, addressed to Ombudsman from the facility regarding discharge notification revealed a list of discharges from the facility during January 2021. Review of the facility admission/discharge report, dated 08/24/22, for residents discharged from 02/01/21 to 08/24/22 revealed the following residents received a facility-initiated discharge to an acute care hospital: - Resident #206 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to develop individualized care plans for Residents #14, #35, #37, #42 and #48 related to smoking, wounds, and pain. This affected five of 24 resident care plans reviewed. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety disorder, cerebral ischemia, adult failure to thrive, surgical amputation of left big toe, major depressive disorder, chronic pain, insomnia, lumbago and sciatica, syncope and collapse. Review of the smoking assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #35 was a daily smoker and did not need the facility to store his lighter or cigarettes. On 08/22/22 at 11:29 A.M. Resident #35 was observed wheeling down the hallway with an unlit cigarette hanging out of his mouth. Resident #35 was also observed smoking independently on 08/23/22 at 10:29 A.M. and 12:17 P.M. Review of Resident #35's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to ensure the designated smoking area was maintained in a safe manner affecting all 23 residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, #8, #10, #11, #12, #14, #16, #20, #21, #23, #27, #31, #35, #37, #44, #45, #48, #51, #54, #156, #207) that smoked at the facility. The facility also failed to ensure Resident #31 was properly supervised and smoking materials were maintained by nursing as identified in her care plan and/or smoking assessment affecting one resident (Resident #31) out of three residents (Residents #31, #35, and #37) reviewed for smoking. The facility census was 58. Findings include: 1. Observation on 08/22/22 at 11:44 A.M. revealed a plastic garbage container without a cover was in the outside designated smoking area that was approximately three- fourths full of plastic and Styrofoam cups and paper debris. The garbage container also contained approximately 15 cigarette butts laying on top of the cups and paper debris, and cigarette ashes were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure resident funds were conveyed timely upon discharge from the facility. This affected one resident (#221) of two residents reviewed for conveyance of funds. The facility census was 58. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #221 revealed an admission date of 02/25/22 and discharge date of 03/31/22. Review of the business records for Resident #221 revealed a check for $320.00 dispersed to the treasurer of the state dated 07/27/22 to close Resident #221's account. Interview on 08/25/22 at 11:09 A.M. with Administrator verified Resident #221's funds were conveyed outside of the required 30 day timeframe.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure reasonable care was taken for the protection of resident property from loss or theft. This affected two residents (Resident#14, and #34) out of three residents (Resident #14, #32, and #34) reviewed for misappropriation of personal property. The facility census was 58. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 09/09/21. Resident #34 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE]. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, hypertension, morbid obesity, bipolar disorder, mood disorder, and major depression. The medical record did not include a personal inventory of her belongings. Review of the care plan dated 10/28/21 revealed Resident #34 had an activities of daily living self-care deficit related to multiple sclerosis, neurogenic bladder, lymphedema, and obesity. The care plan indicated Resident #34 was totally dependent of staff with bed mobility, and transfers. There was nothing per her care plan regarding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a Patient Assessment and Resident Review (PASRR) was completed as required for two residents (Resident #34 and Resident #37) out of two residents (Resident #34 and #37) reviewed for PASRR. The facility census was 58. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 09/09/21. The record revealed Resident #34 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] and discharged to another facility on 08/22/22. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, bipolar disorder, mood disorder, and major depression. There was no PASRR, or hospital exemption noted in her medical record. Review of the care plan dated 10/28/21 revealed Resident #34 had behavioral symptoms related to psychiatric diagnoses. Resident #34 had verbal aggression as she yelled at staff when immediate gratification could not be met, argumentative when redirected per caregivers, demanding, accusatory and manipulative behaviors as she threatened to contact the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician acted upon the recommendations by the pharmacist for Resident #42. This affected one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #42 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including pneumonia, vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, hypothyroidism, psychosis, COVID 19, cerebral infarction. Review of the current physician orders revealed Resident #42 was ordered ibuprofen (a non-opioid analgesic) 500 milligrams as needed for pain and oxycodone (an opioid analgesic) for pain. There were no parameters as to when to administer the non-opioid or opioid analgesic. Review of the pain evaluation dated 06/15/22 indicated Resident #42 had general pain, occasionally, made it hard to sleep at night, limited her day to day activities, movement increased her pain, pain meds only help. Description…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to ensure a bottle of Dakin's (diluted bleach solution) was secured in Resident #30 and Resident #48's room located on the secured unit. This affected two (Residents #30 and #48) out of seven Residents (#8, #15, #28, #29, #30, #48, and #256) reviewed for unsecured medications and/ or treatment supplies in their rooms. This had the potential to affect 18 residents (Resident #11, #12, #13, #16, #20, #24, #25, #27, #30, #32, #40, #48, #49, #50, #51, #52, #54, #156, #256) on the secured unit that were independent with ambulation and/or locomotion or unsecured medication was located in their room. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 03/15/22 and diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, quadriplegia, alcohol abuse, and borderline personality disorder. Review of the care plan dated 04/03/22 revealed Resident #48 required the secured behavioral unit as he had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2019-08-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation of trayline, review of a test tray, interview, record review and policy review the facility failed to ensure meals were served at palatable temperatures. This had the potential to affect all 49 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observation of lunch trayline on 08/27/19 starting at 12:03 P.M. revealed a meal consisting of bruchetta chicken (breaded chicken breast with tomatoes and cheese), buttered bowtie pasta, Italian green beans, a bread stick and an ice cream cup. Temperatures were taken at the start of trayline by [NAME] #106 with the facility's self-calibrating digital thermometer and were as follows: pureed noodles 166 degrees Fahrenheit (F), pureed green beans 178 degrees F, mashed potatoes 197 degrees F, pureed chicken bruchetta 158 degrees F, ground chicken bruchetta 149 degrees F, noodles 143 degrees F, green beans 209 degrees F, chicken 182 degrees F and milk 33 degrees F. Trayline started on 08/27/19 at 12:10 P.M. and a test tray was requested for the back (secured) unit. The back unit meals were started at 12:21 P.M., the test…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-08-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure clean and sanitary nourishment areas. This affected all 49 residents receiving food from the kitchen. The facility census was 49. Findings include: Observation of the back unit nourishment refrigerator with Dietary Manager (DM) #100 on 08/26/19 at 9:20 A.M. revealed three sandwiches not labeled or dated, three takeout containers not labeled or dated and a half gallon of chocolate milk dated 08/19/19. The back unit refrigerator's shelves were noted to have spilled juice on them. Observation of the front unit nourishment refrigerator with DM #100 on 08/26/19 at 9:25 A.M. revealed two sandwiches and one chef's salad not labeled or dated and three containers of whitefish spread not dated. Interview with DM #100 at the time of the above observations verified resident food items were to be labeled, dated and stored in a clean and sanitary environment. Review of an undated sign posted on both the back and front unit refrigerators revealed third shift nurses were responsible for filling out temperature logs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-08-29 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of beneficiary notices, the facility failed to ensure Residents #38 and #53 were provided skilled nursing facility advanced beneficiary notices upon being cut from skilled services and remaining in the facility and failed to provide 48 hours notice of the end of skilled services to Resident #53 to initiate an appeal if desired. This affected two of three beneficiary notices reviewed (#3). The facility census was 49 residents. Findings include: Review of the beneficiary notices revealed Resident #38 was provided a notice of Medicare non-coverage that skilled services would end on 07/25/19 and signed receipt of the notice on 07/23/19. Resident #53 was provided a notice of Medicare non-coverage that skilled services would end on 08/09/19. The daughter signed receipt of the notice on 08/09/19. There was no evidence the notice was provided 48 hours prior to the end of skilled coverage. Review of the beneficiary notices revealed two residents (#38 and #53) who remained in the facility were not provided skilled nursing facility advanced beneficiary notice of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-08-29 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receive appropriate and assessed restorative services. This affected three residents (#9, #27 and #43) of four residents (#9, #27, #31 and #43) reviewed for range of motion out of 45 residents #2, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #12, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #23, #25, #26, #27, #28, #29, #31, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, #38, #39, #40, #41, #42, #43, #44, #45, #46, #47, #49, #50, #51, #52, #53 and #204) identified as receiving one or more restorative services. The facility census was 49 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including moyamoya disease, altered mental status, restlessness an agitation, hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting left non dominant side, convulsions, brief psychotic disorder, encephalopathy, cortical blindness, left watershed and right stroke. Review of the restorative mobility assessment on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-08-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the humidifier had enough water to bubble and failed to ensure oxygen equipment was kept clean. The affected six residents (#6, #35, #38, #41, #43 and #55) of eight residents (#6, #18, #35, #38, #41, #43, #49, and #55) whose oxygen concentrators were not maintained. The facility census was 49. Findings include: On 08/26/19 at 9:30 A.M. Resident #43 was observed in room using oxygen via nasal canula at 2 liters per minute. The oxygen concentrator was observed to be moderately soiled with loose and dried debris. The bottle of water was dated 08/02/19 and was empty. On 08/26/19 at 4:28 P.M. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #104 verified the condition of the oxygen concentrator, the date on the bottle and that the bottle was empty. Interview with LPN #104 on 08/26/19 at 4:28 P.M. indicated every shift the nurse was to check the oxygen for each resident. She said the equipment should be changed weekly including the humidifier. She confirmed the bottle was dated 08/02/19 and should have been changed a couple of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-29 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with written notice of transfer. This affected one resident (Resident #41) of one resident reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 49 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #41's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/14/12 and diagnoses including failure to thrive, multiple sclerosis, diabetes, cocaine abuse, dysphagia and hypertension. Review of a discharge minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #41 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance for transfers and dressing. Review of a nurses' note dated 07/18/19 revealed Resident #41 was lethargic, drowsy, drooling and cold and clammy to touch. Registered Nurse (RN) #103 took his blood sugar which measured 46 millimoles/liter (mmol/L) and administered orange juice, oral glucose (sugar) and a glucagon injection (injectable sugar solution used to raise blood sugar levels). RN #103 took Resident #41's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-29 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to submit a resident discharge assessment for a resident who was discharged to the hospital and did not return to the facility. This affected one resident (Resident #1) of one residents reviewed for resident discharge assessments. The facility census was 49. Findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, senile degeneration of brain, hypertension and depression. Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed nurses' notes indicating the resident was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. The medical record did not reveal a completed or transmitted resident MDS (minimum data set) discharge assessment. An interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON)/MDS Nurse on 08/29/18 at 3:00 P.M., confirmed that Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and then transferred to another facility. The ADON/MDS Nurse indicated the family did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-29 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to coordinate care regarding resident pre-admission screen and resident review (PASRR). This affected one resident (Resident #19) of three residents reviewed who had a level two mental illness or intellectual disability. The facility census was 49. Findings include: Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, muscle weakness, generalized anxiety disorder, dementia with behavioral disturbance and paranoid schizophrenia. Review of the pre-admission screen and resident review (PASRR) determination dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 had a history of serious mental illness and was approved for nursing facility services for a specified period of 90 days to allow sufficient time to prepare for a safe and orderly transition from the nursing facility to the community. Resident #19 was to return to the community when the determination expired on [DATE]. Review of Resident #19's electronic and paper medical records…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised as needed. This affected one (Resident #51) of 23 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 49 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #51's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/27/19 with diagnoses including hypertension (high blood pressure), type two diabetes, anemia and osteoarthritis, Review of a quarterly comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #51 was cognitively intact, required supervision for eating and extensive assistance of one staff for toileting, hygiene and dressing. Review of a smoking assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #51 required assistance to get to the outside patio and his cigarettes and lighter were to be kept in a secured area. Review of an undated care plan for smoking revealed Resident #51's cigarettes were to be kept at the nurses's station and the resident could smoke unsupervised. An additional intervention listed revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #48 received treatment and care in accordance with the comprehensive person-centered care plan. This affected one, Resident #48, of three residents (#21, #35 and #48) reviewed for non-pressure skin impairment. The facility census was 49 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including altered mental status, symbolic dysfunctions, dementia without behavioral disturbance and weakness. Review of the physician's order dated 07/26/19 indicated she was to wear Tubigrips or Geri sleeves (protective sleeves) to all extremities. Review of the comprehensive assessment (MDS 3.0) dated 08/06/19 indicated she was severely cognitively impaired, displayed no behavioral symptoms, had skin tears and non surgical dressings. Review of the potential for skin tears related to thin skin plan of care developed on 07/26/19 indicated to keep her nails…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2022-08-25 · tag F0582 — widespreadGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of Medicare Beneficiary Notices and interview, the facility failed to provide complete Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNFABN) forms for two residents (#35 and #45) and provided the Medicare Notice of Non-Coverage and the SNFABN to Resident #56 when these forms were not appropriate for a voluntary end of coverage. This affected three of three residents reviewed for SNFABN. Findings include: Review of Resident #35's SNFABN revealed no indication of when non-coverage would begin, the estimated cost to remain in the facility and choosing one of three options. Resident #35 signed the notice on 03/12/22. Review of Resident #45's SNFABN revealed no indication of when non-coverage would begin, the estimated cost to remain in the facility and choosing one of three options. Resident #45 signed the notice on 06/14/22. Review of Resident #56's Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage for CMS10123 indicated his last covered day was 07/30/22. The facility indicated this was a voluntary end to the Medicare services. No notice was required however he was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2019-08-29 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure daily posted nursing staff information was updated timely. This had the potential to affect all 49 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observation of the posted nursing staff information on 08/27/19 12:57 P.M. revealed the posted nursing staff information was dated from Sunday 08/25/19 into Monday 08/26/19. The Director of Nursing (DON) verified the information was not up to date in an interview on 08/27/19 at 12:57 P.M.
- No harm found · C2019-08-29 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — widespreadHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure smoking areas were maintained in a clean manner, and cigarette butts were disposed of in approved containers. This had the potential to affect the 12 Residents who smoke. The facility census was 49. Findings include Observations of the enclosed smoking area with the assistant maintenance director #6 on 08/26/19 at 10:59 A.M., revealed Residents utilized an enclosed smoking area located off the main dining room. There was a red container with a lid, the red container had cigarette butts, paper and plastic items. There was a large trash receptacle, three quarters filled with items and dried leaves. There were over 15 cigarette butts in the leaves. The assistant maintenance staff #6 verified the findings at the time of the observations.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COURY, ELIAS | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 11/01/2000 |
| FOX, NORMAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2000 |
| BHP MANAGEMENT CORPORATION | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2016 |
| FOX, ALEXANDER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/02/2019 |
| TRANQUILITY COUNSELING SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/31/2025 |
| BHIMANI, JAYANTILAL | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $515K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365875. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.