Main Street Terrace Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 70 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 33.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 46.4 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.41 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.84 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the facility policy, review of information from the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized pressure ulcer program to prevent the deterioration of a pressure ulcer for Resident #45. Actual Harm occurred on 10/03/24 when Resident #45, who was admitted to the facility with a Stage III (full-thickness loss of skin, in which subcutaneous fat may be visible in the ulcer and granulation tissue and epibole (rolled wound edges) are often present) sacral pressure ulcer was assessed to have an unstageable (full-thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue damage within the ulcer cannot be confirmed because the wound bed is obscured by slough or eschar) pressure ulcer with the presence of slough and necrotic tissue to the area. The deterioration of the pressure ulcer was a result of the facility not implementing effective and timely treatment. This affected one…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-12-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of service report and email, the facility failed to maintain a clean stove hood in the kitchen. This had the potential to affect all 45 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 45.Findings include:Observation of the kitchen on 12/30/25 at 10:20 A.M. revealed the kitchen hood above the stove to be dusty. Observation of the inspection and cleaning sticker on the kitchen hood revealed it was last cleaned 08/27/25 and due again after 90 days. Interview with the Dietary Manager on 12/30/25 at 10:22 A.M. confirmed the kitchen hood above the stove was dusty and should have been cleaned and confirmed the kitchen hood was supposed to be cleaned every 90 days. The Dietary Manager further confirmed having paperwork to show inspections were completed but reported they were not the most current reports. Review of the service report revealed a date of 02/13/25. Review of an email dated 02/28/25 from Silco Fire and Security revealed the next inspection was scheduled for 03/06/25. There were no further service reports or documentation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on closed record review, interview, and review of the facility's Beneficiary Notices, the facility failed to provide notification to residents and/or representative within 48 hours. This affected one resident, (#53), of three residents reviewed for Beneficiary Notification. The facility census was 45.Findings include:Review of the closed record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 08/23/25 and discharge date of 09/13/25. Diagnoses for Resident #53 included, but were not limited to, dementia (9/9/25), obstructive and reflux uropathy (8/26/25), GERD (8/23/25), osteoarthritis (8/23/25), HTN (8/23/25), anxiety disorder (8/23/25), adult failure to thrive (8/23/25), anemia (8/23/25), altered mental status (8/23/25), pain (8/23/25), tachycardia (8/23/25), atherosclerotic heart disease (8/23/25), and obesity (8/23/25). BIMS for Resident #53, according to Minimum Data Set (MDS) section C, signed 09/15/25, was 11. Review of the facility's Beneficiary Notice revealed the notice for Resident #53 had an effective date of 09/11/25 for coverage to end. Further review revealed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, review of a facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI), review of December 2025 In-service Sign Off, and review of the facility's Resident Safety policy, the facility failed to complete resident abuse in-service reeducation for an agency aide involved in an abuse allegation following the investigation. This affected one, (#06), of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 45.Findings include:Review of Resident #06's record revealed an admission date of 11/11/25 with diagnoses of, but not limited to, muscle weakness (11/11/25), difficulty in walking (11/11/25), other lack of coordination (11/11/25), cognitive communication deficit (11/11/25), low back pain (11/11/25), chronic pain syndrome (11/11/25), weakness (11/7/25). Review of Resident #06's Minimum Data Set (MDS) signed 11/21/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14. Interview with Resident #06 on 12/29/25 at 1:50 P.M. revealed the resident had an incident with an aide, believed to have occurred a few weeks ago. Resident #06 reported the aide had been…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure preadmission screening resident review (PASARR)'s were up dated with additional mental illness diagnoses. This affected three residents (#5, #8 and #23) of three residents reviewed for PASARR. The census was 45.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, diabetes, metabolic encephalopathy, emphysema, chronic respiratory failure, psychosis, depression, and anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was not intact. He required set up or clean up assistance with eating, oral hygiene, dependent on toileting, personal hygiene, substantial/maximal assistance for shower/bathing and partial/maximal assistance with turning and repositioning. Always incontinent of bladder and always continent of bowel. Further review revealed a PASARR completed on 08/17/23. On 12/24/24 Resident #5 received a new diagnosis of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of care plan, and interview, the facility failed to ensure monitoring was in place for the side effects of opioid medications. This affected one (#4) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 45. Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, fracture of right fibula and fracture of shaft of left femur. Review of a care plan dated 06/18/25 revealed no evidence of monitoring for side effects of taking opioid medications. Review of an order dated 10/30/25 revealed Resident #4 had hydrocodone-acetaminophen oral tablet 5-325 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth every four hours as needed for pain. There was no evidence of an order for monitoring side effects for opioid medications. Review of a minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4's cognition remained intact, she had no behaviors, she had frequent pain of two, and she took an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided a care conference quarterly. This affected one resident (#7) of one resident reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 45. Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, asthma, and depression. Review of the medical record revealed there had been no quarterly care conferences since 01/21/25. Review of minimum data set (MDS) assessment records revealed Resident #7 had MDS' completed on 03/26/25, 06/26/25, and 09/26/25. Review of a MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7's cognition remained intact and she had no behaviors. Interview on 12/29/25 at 1:30 P.M. with Resident #7 revealed she could not recall having a care conference. Interview on 12/30/25 at 1:21 P.M. with Social Worker (SW) #201 revealed the Director of Nursing (DON) is who usually documents care conferences. SW #201 stated care conference should be completed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident nebulizer equipment was stored in a safe and sanitary manner and not laying directly on their bed surface or bedside tablet. This affected two residents (Resident #01 and #23) of the three residents reviewed for oxygen. The facility census was 45. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #01 revealed an admission date of 11/22/22 with a re-entry date of 12/05/23. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive sleep apnea, pulmonary disease, respiratory disorder, and malignant neoplasm of the pancreas and left lower right lung lobe. Review of Resident #01's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating an intact cognition for daily decision-making abilities. Review of Resident #01's current physician orders revealed an order for Albuterol Sulfate inhalation 2.5 milligram (mg) per every 3 milliliter…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and observation the facility failed to ensure residents' pulse was monitored prior to administration of medication as well as pain medication had parameters in place related to the numeric pain scale. This affected two residents (#12 and #4) of the five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. The facility census was 45. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 02/22/21. Diagnoses included anxiety disorder, acute respiratory failure, hypertension, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of Resident #12's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03 out of 15 indicating a severely impaired cognition for daily decision-making abilities. Review of Resident #12's current physician orders revealed an order for Atenolol (beta blocker) oral tablet 50 milligrams (mg) give one tablet in the morning. Hold for pulse less than 55. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, food taste testing, and interview, the facility failed to prepare pureed foods in a way to maintain nutritious value and palatability. This affected three residents (#30, #35, and #42) of three residents on pureed diets. The facility census was 45.Findings include:Observation of puree lunch preparation on 12/30/25 at 10:30 A.M. revealed Dietary [NAME] (DC) #266 to be preparing barbeque pork and mixed vegetables. While pureeing the mixed vegetables, DC #266 added about 3/4ths a cup of water and three unmeasured portions of thickener throughout the puree process. Post pureeing the mixed vegetables, this surveyor tasted them and noted the flavor to be bland with little to no flavor. The Dietary Manager tasted the mixed vegetables as well and confirmed them to have little to no flavor. Interview with the Dietary Manager on 12/30/25 at 10:35 A.M. confirmed DC #266 used water and unmeasured amounts of thickener to prepare the pureed mixed vegetables. Dietary Manager confirmed DC #266 should have used broth to maintain nutritious value and palatability of the pureed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0810 — isolated
  Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided assistive devices as ordered. This affected one resident (#7) of one resident reviewed for assistive devices. The facility census was 45. Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, asthma, and depression. Review of an order dated 10/04/21 revealed Resident #7 was to receive plastic tumblers with lids for all drinks. Review of a minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7's cognition remained intact, she had no behaviors, and she received a mechanically altered diet. Review of a care plan initiated on 06/26/19 and revised on 12/26/25 revealed Resident #7 was at risk for altered nutrition and hydration related to body mass index, mechanically altered diet, and prone to edema. The goals were to consume adequate nourishment to achieve optimal nutrition with no signs or symptoms of dehydrations, aspirations…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-11-20 for 16 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH