Embassy Of Lebanon
700 Monroe Road, Lebanon, OH 45036 · For profit - Corporation · 79 certified beds · (513) 932-0105 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $197,584 in federal fines (most recent 2023-08-23)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (68%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- its last standard health inspection was over 3 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 1.9% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.7% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.5% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.9% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.5% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 41.1% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.5% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.4% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.8% | 21.4% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 4.0% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 75.0% | 75.6% | 79.4% | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 13% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.25 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 79 beds and averages 59.6 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.17 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.67 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.25 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
49 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the incident investigation and witness statements, observations, staff and physician interview, review of the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) report and hospital records, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the residents were free from burns sustained from the water in the shower room at the facility and failed to timely conduct a root-cause analysis of the resident's burns. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and serious life-threatening harm and/or injuries when Resident #17 sustained severe burns on the left leg from her inner thigh to the foot and to her right inner thigh from a shower in the [NAME] shower room on 07/21/23. Subsequently, Resident #17 required hospitalization due to the severe burns and developed Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the wounds. Additionally, the facility did not identify the root-cause analysis of Resident #17's burns until 08/10/23. This affected one (#17) of three residents reviewed for accident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2022-10-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THIS IS AN INCIDENCE OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, and review of the facility ' s smoking policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #34 did not smoke while wearing oxygen. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious life-threatening harm and/or injuries when agency State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #10 took Resident #34 outside for a smoke break and lit the resident ' s cigarette while Resident #34 was wearing oxygen per nasal cannula. The oxygen ignited, resulting in burns to both nostrils and singed the nose hairs. This affected one (Resident #34) of four residents reviewed for smoking. The facility identified 16 residents (#01, #02, #05, #06, #09, #17, #19, #20, #22, #34, #39, #44, #45, #48, #52, and #156) who smoke and six residents (#05, #17, #19, #20, #34, and #45) who use oxygen and smoke. The facility census was 58. On 10/05/2022 at 11:51 A.M., the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2019-10-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident was accurately assessed and interventions were put into place to prevent fluid overload. The resulted in actual harm when Resident #12 became short of breath and requested to be sent out to the hospital where he required a procedure to remove 5.3 liters of fluid off of his abdomen. This affect one (Resident #12) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. The faciltiy also failed to complete wound treatments as ordered. This affected one (Resident #13) of four residents reviewed for skin related conditions. The facility census was 64. Findings include: 1. Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including osteoarthritis, cirrhosis of the liver requiring paracentesis, right below the knee amputation, anxiety disorder major depression, hypertension, coronary artery disease, congestive heart disease, atrial fibrillation, hypothyroidism, insomnia, morbid obesity and generalized muscle weakness.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2019-10-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, resident interview, staff training, and policy review the facility failed to ensure a resident properly transferred with a slide board and with the assistance of two staff. This resulted in actual harm for Resident #53 when she was transferred via slide board with only one staff member assisting; during the transfer, the resident felt her knee pop, the knee became swollen and she had a decline in transferring. This affected one (Resident #53) of 25 sampled residents. The facility census was 64. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included major depression, hypothyroidism, cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and anxiety. Review of the plan of care, revised 09/27/19, revealed she had a activity of daily living self care deficit related to decreased mobility. The goal was to maintain current level of functioning in bed mobility, transfers and toilet use. Interventions included she may complete slide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2019-10-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, consultant dietician interview, and policy review, the facility failed to assess and timely implement interventions to prevent significant weight loss. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #33, who had a significant weight loss and the facility failed to implement nutritional interventions to prevent further weight loss. This affected one (Resident #33) of five residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 64. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral palsy, pemphigus vulgaris (is a rare autoimmune disease that causes painful blistering on the skin and mucous membranes), Alzheimer's and severe intellectual disability. On 03/04/19, the resident weighed 168 pounds. On 04/23/19, the physician ordered Ensure Plus at bedtime. Review of the nutritional note dated 09/02/19 revealed the resident had experienced a significant weight loss and due to his choice of gluten…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that residents had the appropriate signage, Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), and orders for being in Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). This affected two Residents (#28 and #40) of three residents sampled for enhanced barrier precautions. The facility census was 55. Findings include: 1) Review of the medical record revealed Resident #40 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cerebral infarction, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, unspecified dementia, and seizures. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) comprehensive assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #40 was cognitively intact and was dependent on staff for Activities of daily living (ADL) including transfers. Observation on 05/21/26 at 10:00 A.M., revealed Resident #40 had a foley indwelling catheter with a dignity bag hanging on the side of his bed. There was no signage at the resident's room indicating the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-04-14 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of staffing schedules. staff and resident interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) was present in the facility for eight consecutive hours a day as required. This had the potential to affect all 59 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of the staffing schedules dated 04/01/26 to 04/07/26 revealed a RN/Director of Nursing (DON) present in the facility for eight hours daily Monday through Friday. Review of the facility employment punches dated 04/06/26 revealed the facility did not have a registered nurse working at the facility. Additionally, the employment time punches revealed three Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN) each working 12 hours shifts remained in the facility to care for the residents. Interview on 04/08/26 at 12:41 P.M. with Resident #12 stated the DON had to go with him for the surgical appointment that was on Monday at an outpatient surgical center. Resident #12 stated there was a mix up with the times and the respiratory therapist could not go with him. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility self-reported incidents (SRI's), staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to timely report an allegation of verbal abuse to the survey agency as required. This affected one (#53) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #53 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, intermittent explosive disorder, psychosis not due to substance or physiological condition, dementia with behavioral disturbances and anxiety. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #53 dated 03/27/26 revealed a severely impaired cognition. Resident #53 was not coded with any behaviors during the assessment period. Resident #53 was dependent for all activities of daily living. Resident #53 was coded as receiving the following medication drug classifications during the look back period: antianxiety, antidepressant,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility self-reported incidents (SRI), staff interviews and facility policy, the facility failed to have documented evidence that an allegation of abuse was thoroughly investigated for Resident #53. This affected one (#53) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #53 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, intermittent explosive disorder, psychosis not due to substance or physiological condition, dementia with behavioral disturbances and anxiety. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #53 dated 03/27/26 revealed a severely impaired cognition. Resident #53 was not coded with any behaviors during the assessment period. Resident #53 was dependent for all activities of daily living. Resident #53 was coded as receiving the following medication drug classifications during the look back period:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff and resident interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure two (#22 and #21) dependent residents were assisted in a timely manner for meal assistance. Additionally, the facility failed to provide care and services for one (#46) dependent resident with facial hair. This affected three (#22, #21 and #46) out of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 59. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #21 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to chronic respiratory failure, displaced fracture of third cervical vertebra, and quadriplegia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #21 dated 02/27/26 revealed an impaired cognition with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of twelve. Resident #21 eating was coded as not applicable. Resident required total staff dependence for toileting, bed mobility and transfers. Resident #21 was coded…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered to the correct resident resulting in significant mediation errors. This affected one (#60) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #60 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to end stage renal disease, hemorrhage due to vascular prosthetic devices and implants, hypertension and hypothyroidism. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #60 was not completed and in progress. Review of the plan of care for Resident #60 dated 04/04/26 revealed resident was prescribed antibiotic therapy related to pneumonia for seven days. Interventions included administer medication as ordered, observing adverse reactions related to antibiotics, and report pertinent laboratory results to physician. Review of the physicians orders for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure prescribed medications were not left in residents room unsecured and unsupervised. This affected three (#29, #10 and #45) out of three residents reviewed for medication storage. The facility census was 59. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #45 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to cerebrovascular disease, hemiplegia affecting the right side, contractures of muscles multiple sites. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #45 dated 01/09/26 revealed an impaired cognition with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of twelve. Resident #45 required set up assistance from staff for eating, dependent on staff for toileting, and moderate assistance for transfers and bed mobility. Resident #45 was incontinent of bladder and bowel. Resident #45 was coded as having applications of ointments and medication to areas other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility water management plan documents, staff interview, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive water management plan. This had the potential to affect all 59 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 59. Findings include:Review of the facility undated water management plan (WMP) revealed a list of the WMP team members, description of the building water systems, diagrams showing water flow and areas where Legionella growth could grow and spread, control measures and monitoring, ways to intervene when control limits are not met, and a process for validation. The facility's control measures and monitoring included storing water at 140 degrees (Fahrenheit) delivering at 120 degrees (Fahrenheit), running water in empty rooms daily and weekly as needed, running water in all rooms monthly, and draining water heaters periodically to remove scale and sediment build up. The plan did not specify the specific areas or sources the water temperatures would be obtained from.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed five percent (%). Two medication errors occurred within 25 opportunities for an error rate of eight percent. This affected one (Resident #32) of two residents observed during medication administration. The facility census was 55.Findings included:Record review for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 08/23/23. Diagnoses included kidney disease, metabolic encephalopathy, and seizures. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #32 had mild cognitive impairment. Review of the active physician orders for Resident #32 for 07/01/25 revealed the orders included Aspirin 81 milligrams (mg) chewable one tablet every day for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prevention and Mucinex (Guaifenesin) 12-hour 600 mg extended release twice a day four pneumonia. Observation on 07/07/25 at 9:40 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors. This affected one (Resident #27) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The census was 58 residents. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 07/03/24 with diagnoses including coronary artery disease, heart failure, hypertension, and diabetes. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #27 dated 10/16/24 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and was independent with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of a progress note dated 12/24/24 revealed no evidence the resident went on a LOA for the night. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #27 revealed the resident should receive the following medications on 12/25/24 between 6:00 A.M. and 10:00 A.M.: Norvasc 2.5 milligram (mg), Plavix 75 mg, Pepcid 20 mg, fenofibrate 48 mg, Jardiance 10 mg, Kapspargo 100 mg, magnesium oxide 400 mg, pantoprazole 40 mg, Gabapentin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 34 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, interviews and policy reviews the facility failed to ensure urinary catheter care was provided in a dignified manner. This affected one (#19) out of three residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility census was 63. Findings include Review of medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 12/11/23. Diagnoses included neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, inflammatory disorder of male genital organ, cystitis without hematuria, tracheostomy, and obstructive and reflux uropathy. Review of Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #19 revealed an resident was cognitively intact. Resident #19 was substantial maximal assistance for toileting, and bathing. Resident #19 was coded with placement if an indwelling urinary catheter. Review of plan of care dated 09/19/24 revealed that Resident #19 was at risk for potential for complications related to the use of suprapubic catheter related to neurogenic bladder. Interventions included change…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure urinary catheter care was completed and documented as ordered. This affected one (#64) of three residents reviewed for catheter care. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #64 revealed an admission on [DATE] and a discharge on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to infection and inflammatory reaction due to other urinary catheter, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, quadriplegia and history of sepsis. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #64 revealed an intact cognition. Resident #64 was coded with delusions. Resident #64 was dependent on staff for eating, bed mobility, transfers and toileting. Resident #64 was assessed as having a urinary suprapubic catheter and a colostomy. Review of the plan of care for Resident #64 dated 05/21/24 revealed a potential for complications related to use of suprapubic catheter due to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to follow the physician orders for medication administration. This affected two (#30 and #64) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 63. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #30 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses of insomnia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #30 revealed a moderately impaired cognition. Resident #30 requires staff assistance for the completion of activities of daily living. Review of the physicians orders for Resident #30 revealed an order dated 10/04/24 and a for melatonin oral tablets 3 milligrams with directions for administration to give 3 mg by mouth at bedtime for insomnia and an order dated 07/03/24 for melatonin oral tablets 3 mg with directions to administer 3 tablets by mouth at bedtime for insomnia. Review of the medication administration record (MAR) for the month of October…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, review of medication manufacturer instructions, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a staff member primed (performed a safety test) when using an insulin pen-injector, resulting in a significant medication error. This affected one (#2) of five residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Review of Resident #02's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/19/24. Diagnoses included type one diabetes mellitus. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #02 was cognitively intact and received insulin injections. Review of the physician orders for Resident #02 revealed orders dated 11/07/24 for Lantus SoloStar Subcutaneous Solution Pen-injector 100 units per milliliter (long-acting insulin) inject 45 units subcutaneously when rising for diabetes mellitus and Humalog kwik pen Subcutaneous Solution pen injector 100 unit/ml inject per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff accurately documented dietary intake of meals. This affected one (#64) of three residents reviewed for staff assistance with dietary intake. The facility census is 63. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #64 revealed an admission on [DATE] and a discharge on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to quadriplegia and history of sepsis. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #64 revealed an intact cognition. Resident #64 was coded with delusions. Resident #64 was dependent on staff for eating, bed mobility, transfers and toileting. Review of the plan of care for Resident #64 is at risk for self care deficit related to diagnoses sepsis, paraplegia due to post motor vehicle accident and chronic pain. Resident is alert and oriented times three, communicates needs effectively, and requires total assistance with activities of daily living. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure medication error rates were less than 5% when they gave Resident #39 the wrong medication and Resident #38 blood pressure medication was not held for low blood pressure. This affected two (Resident #38 and #39) of four residents observed for medication administration. There were two errors out of 25 opportunities for a medication error rate of 8 %. The facility census was 58. Findings include: 1 Record review of Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 01/19/21 with pertinent diagnoses of: hypertension, cognitive communication deficit, hyperlipidemia, and dementia. Review of the 07/26/24 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and used a wheelchair to aid in mobility. Review of the Physician Order dated 03/26/24 revealed Norvasc (a blood pressure medication) five milligrams by mouth one time a day for hypertension. Hold for systolic pressure under 110. Observation of a medication administration pass for Resident #38 on 10/08/24 at 8:50…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to follow infection control procedures. This affected two (#10 and #13) residents out of the three residents reviewed. The facility census was 58. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 03/20/23 with medical diagnoses of anoxic brain damage, anxiety, dependence on ventilator, tracheostomy, and seizures. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] which indicated Resident #10 was rare/never understood or able to understand others. The MDS indicated Resident #10 was dependent upon staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs). Review the MDS revealed Resident #10 had a gastrointestinal tube (g-tube), tracheostomy, and was on a mechanical ventilator. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed a physician order dated 06/26/24 for Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure foods were labeled and dated and failed to ensure expired foods were discarded in resident refrigerators. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure kitchen equipment was maintained in sanitary condition. This had the potential to affect 56 out of 58 residents who received food from the kitchen, the facility identified two (#3 and #53) residents who do not receive their food/meals from the kitchen. The facility census was 58. Findings include: Observation on 10/05/22 at 10:00 A.M. revealed the kitchen hood screens above the cooking surfaces of the stove and grill had a coating of heavy grease and dusty debris. The hood cleaning sticker on the side of the hood revealed the next scheduled cleaning was to be on 09/20/22. Observation on 10/05/22 at 12:23 P.M. revealed a sign on the refrigerator stating label and date each item before putting in the fridge. After three days throw away. The following concerns were identified in the resident [NAME] Unit refrigerator: 1. Three open containers of juice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete repairs to ensure a safe and comfortable environment for two (Residents #24 and #12) of four residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 58. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #24 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure, neurocognitive disorder with Lewy Bodies, diabetes, hemiplegia, dementia, dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, and acute kidney failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #24 had intact cognition. Observations on 10/04/22, 10/05/22, and 10/06/22 from 8:00 A.M. to 4:30 P.M. revealed in Resident #24's room, wallpaper was pulled away from the wall above the resident's head. The bathroom had holes and wall patching in the wall across from the toilet. There were four to five window blind slats preventing privacy for the resident when closed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received timely assistance to transfer out of bed. This affected one (#33) of five residents sampled for activities of daily living (ADL) assistance. The facility census was 58. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 09/01/2021. Diagnoses included but were not limited acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, type II diabetes, unspecified systolic heart failure, morbid obesity, unspecified bipolar disorder, irritable bowel syndrome, and unspecified schizoaffective disorder. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, did not reject care, and did not wander. Resident #33 was a one to two-person physical assist, required limited assistance for bed mobility, total assistance for transfers, extensive assistance for dressing, toileting, and personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a residents indwelling urinary (Foley) catheter bag was timely emptied and not being stored on the floor. This affected one (#12) of five residents reviewed for urinary catheter care. The facility census was 58. Findings Include: Record review of Resident #12 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #12 included osteomyelitis left ankle and foot, diabetes, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. Review of the Minimum Data Set, (MDS) comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition and was receiving medications insulin, Aquaphor, Zofran, and mirtazapine. The resident was currently receiving Macrobid antibiotic for urinary tract infection and had an order for a urinary catheter. Further review of Resident #12's medical record revealed the resident had an physician orders for an indwelling urinary (Foley) catheter. Observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff and resident interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents had mediations available as ordered. This affected one (#33) of five residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 58. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 09/01/2021. Diagnoses included but were not limited acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, type II diabetes, unspecified systolic heart failure, morbid obesity, unspecified bipolar disorder, irritable bowel syndrome, and unspecified schizoaffective disorder. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, did not reject care, and did not wander. Resident #33 was a one to two-person physical assist, required limited assistance for bed mobility, total assistance for transfers, extensive assistance for dressing, toileting, and personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-10-31 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — patternProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and observation, the facility failed to ensure residents with broken or decayed teeth were provided dental services. This involved three (Residents #12, #39, #46) of three residents reviewed for dental care. Findings include: 1. Resident # 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #12 as having intact cognition. The resident had obvious or likely cavities and broken teeth however had no mouth or facial pain or difficulty chewing. On 09/11/19, the facility completed an dental evaluation which identified Resident #12 had broken and missing teeth and only eight natural teeth. The physician wrote an order the resident may see the dentist. During interview on 10/28/19 at 4:02 P.M., Resident #12 revealed that he has broken and decayed teeth which hurt when eating. Upon observation, the resident's teeth were black and broken with many missing teeth. Resident #12 said he had not seen the dentist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. During observation on 10/28/19 at 12:19 P.M., Resident #61 was sitting at the dining room table sleeping. There were 13 other residents in the dining room eating their lunch except for Resident #61. Some of the residents were finishing up their meal or leaving the dining room. Resident #61 had a cup of coffee and a cup of lemonade in front of her. STNA #23 was feeding Resident #17 and STNA #24 was feeding Resident #32. Both STNA's were sitting behind Resident #61. During interview on 10/28/19 at 12:25 P.M. STNA #23 and #24 stated Resident #61 had not eaten and was waiting for her meal. At 12:30 P.M., STNA #23 served the resident her meal. During interview on 10/28/19 at 2:00 P.M., the Director of Nursing stated all meals should be served to all residents in the dining room before staff assist with feeding. Based on record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were dressed during the day and failed to provide a dignified dining experience during lunch. This affected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-31 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included history of falling, dementia, major depression and muscle weakness. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] documented impaired cognition, required extensive assistance of one person for bed mobility, transfer, and used a wheelchair to move about the facility on her own. During observation on 10/28/19 at 11:07 A.M., the resident was being assisted to get into her room. The roommate's wheelchair was up against Resident #27's bed, preventing her from wheeling over to her bed or being able to get in it. There were several pieces of equipment on the roommate's side including an over bed table and an oxygen concentrator. during observation on 10/28/19 at 11:16 A.M., Resident #27 could not navigate around her room as there was too much equipment cluttered throughout her room. The roommate's wheelchair continued to be right next to Resident #27's bed. At 1:30 P.M., the roommate's wheelchair was still up against the bed behind the privacy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-31 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, resident interview, family interview, hospital record review and outside clinical staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident could timely see a provider of their choice; and failed to ensure a resident was assisted to the bus on his outside workshop days. This affected two (Residents #36 and #62) of 25 sampled residents. The facility census was 64. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypertension, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of the admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/18/19, revealed Resident #36 had intact cognition, required extensive assistance from staff for bed mobility, transfer and toileting. Review of the nursing notes dated 10/25/19 revealed the resident had complained of shortness of breath and chest pain. An assessment was completed and she was sent to the local…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-31 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to identify the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) captured a resident's mental illness diagnosis. This affected one (Resident #42) of 25 sampled residents. The facility census was 64. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included paranoid schizophrenia, cognitive communication deficit, and osteoarthritis. Review of the level one PASRR screening dated 03/26/19 documented the resident had no mental illness or Alzheimer's disease, therefore the level two screening was not completed. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a diagnosis of schizophrenia. During interview on 10/30/19 at 10:40 A.M., the Administrator and Admissions Coordinator #42 stated the mental illness diagnoses was not captured on the screening.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to implement a care plan for impaired vision. This affected one (Resident #47) of one resident reviewed for vision. The facility census was 64. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #47 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the care plan dated 05/31/19 stated to apply eye glasses in A.M. and remove at bedtime. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified adequate vision with corrective lenses. During observation on 10/30/19 at 9:45 A.M., Resident #47 was watching television without wearing her eye glasses. The eye glasses were on the night stand and the resident was not able to reach them. During interview on 10/30/19 at 9:46 A.M., Resident #47 stated she could enjoy television more if she could see it. During observation on 10/30/19 at 12:24 P.M., Resident #47 was in bed with food next her on the bed side table. Her eye glasses were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were dressed during the day, clean, and had oral care completed. This affected one (Resident #33) of 25 sampled residents. The facility census was 64. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral palsy, pemphigus vulgaris (is a rare autoimmune disease that causes painful blistering on the skin and mucous membranes), Alzheimer's and severe intellectual disability. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented he had impaired cognition, required extensive assistance of two people for activity of daily living, was independent with eating and had open lesions. Shower sheets dated 10/26/19 and 10/29/19 had no documentation to support he had gotten his scheduled twice weekly showers. Nursing notes dated 10/01/19 to 10/31/19 revealed Resident #33 was having a flare up of his skin condition. Review of the plan of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a nurse did not touch medications with her bare hands, failed to ensure a multi-dose inhaler was sanitized when it fell on the floor and failed to ensure an leg strap for an indwelling urinary catheter was changed when it became soiled. This affected one (Resident #12) of two residents reviewed. Findings include: Resident # 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident had an indwelling urinary catheter. During observation of medication pass on 10/28/19 at 8:35 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #22 removed six medication cards and popped one tablet of medication into her hand prior to putting the medication in the cup. She then used her ink pen to poke holes in a packet of Protonix powder because she did not have scissors to cut open the packet. LPN #22 had the resident's inhaler in her hand and dropped it on the floor as she entered the resident's room to administer his medications. The cap came off, exposing the mouth…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2018-08-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving oxygen therapy had clean disposable oxygen supplies for six residents (#32, #45, #27, #261, #48, #30) residents and failed to ensure to post signage on doors of residents receiving oxygen therapy. This affected four residents (#32, #27, #261, and #4) of 12 residents (#33, #23, #29, #57, #52, and #211) receiving oxygen therapy within the facility. The facility census was 62. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #32's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic ischemic heart disease, anxiety disorder, dementia without behavioral disturbance, atherosclerotic heart disease, cognitive communication deficit, and malignant neoplasm of the large intestine. Observation of Resident #32 on 08/06/18 at 9:00 A.M., revealed two oxygen concentrators were in the room, one of which was near the resident's bed and had an undated saline humidifier bottle and an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-08-09 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to assess residents for their preferences for a dignified existence. This affected two, (#8 & #49) of five residents reviewed for choices. Facility census was 62. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #49's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/15/18 with diagnoses including but not limited to intracerebral hemorrhage, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, hypertension, hemiplegia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, major depressive disorder, contracture of left hand, and metabolic encephalopathy. Review of the residents Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident was cognitively intact, incontinent of bowel and bladder, and required extensive assistance of one to two staff for all activities of daily living. Observation on 08/07/18 at 12:01 P.M. revealed Resident #49 was up in a wheelchair in her room waiting for lunch. Observation on 08/08/18 at 7:25 A.M. revealed Resident #49 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-08-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview , Self-Reported Incident (SRI) review and policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of staff to resident abuse to the administrator and the state agency when a resident expressed a staff member threatened her with physical harm. This affected one (Resident #49) of 24 residents reviewed in the initial pool process. Facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of Resident #49's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/15/18 with diagnoses including but not limited to intracerebral hemorrhage, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, hemiplegia, major depressive disorder, contracture of left hand, and metabolic encephalopathy. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident was cognitively intact, incontinent of bowel and bladder, and required extensive assistance of one to two staff for all activities of daily living. Interview on 08/06/18 at 3:25 P.M. with Resident #49 revealed she had concerns with her treatment by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-08-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, Self-Reported Incident (SRI) review and policy review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy and report an allegation of staff to resident abuse to the administrator and state agency. This affected one (Resident #49) of 24 residents reviewed in the initial pool process. Facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of Resident #49's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/15/18 with diagnoses including but not limited to intracerebral hemorrhage, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, hemiplegia, major depressive disorder, contracture of left hand, and metabolic encephalopathy. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident was cognitively intact, incontinent of bowel and bladder, and required extensive assistance of one to two staff for all activities of daily living. Interview on 08/06/18 at 3:25 P.M. with Resident #49 revealed she had concerns with her treatment by State Tested Nurse Assistant (STNA) #33. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-08-09 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify a resident, the resident's representative or the Ombudsman of a resident's transfer and the reasons for the resident's transfer to the hospital. This affected one (#62) of three closed records reviewed. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of Resident # 62's record indicated the resident was admitted [DATE]. Diagnoses included femur fracture, chronic respiratory failure, Alzheimer's disease, iron deficiency, spinal stenosis, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit and dysphagia. The resident was transferred out to the hospital on [DATE] and admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of sepsis. The resident's record had no evidence that resident, the resident's representative or the Ombudsman had been notified of the residents transfer to the hospital or notified of the reason for the resident's transfer to the hospital. During interview on 08/09/18 at 3:29 P.M. Business Office Manager (BOM) # 7 verified the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-08-09 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide written bed hold information to residents upon transfer to the hospital. This affected one (#62) of three closed records reviewed. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of Resident # 62's record indicated the resident was admitted [DATE]. Diagnoses included femur fracture, chronic respiratory failure, Alzheimer's disease, iron deficiency, spinal stenosis, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit and dysphagia. The resident was transferred out to hospital on [DATE] and admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of sepsis. The resident's record revealed no evidence that bed hold information was provided to the resident or representative at the time of the transfer to the hospital. During interview on 08/09/18 at 3:29 P.M. Business Office Manager (BOM) #7 verified the facility had not provide the resident or the resident's representative bed hold information upon transfer to the hospital and stated the facility had only…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-08-09 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately assess one resident's contractures. This affected one (#13) of two residents reviewed for accuracy of resident assessments. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of Resident #13's medical record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, protein-calorie malnutrition, contracture left and right knee, muscle weakness, adult failure to thrive, abnormal posture, contracture of muscle; multiple sites, dysphagia, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, hyperlipidemia and hypertension. Review of the resident physical therapy evaluation and plan dated 09/27/17 indicated the resident had impaired range of motion (ROM) in both her lower right and left knees and impaired ROM range of motion of both her right and left hands. Review of therapy screen dated 03/22/18 indicated the resident had no changes to her ROM. Review of a occupation therapy (OT) assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-08-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to provide an adequate and accurate care plan for one (Resident #45) of twenty residents reviewed during the investigation phase. The facility identified one resident (Resident #45) receiving dialysis. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a brief interview mental status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating resident was cognitively intact. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including diabetes, congestive heart disease and chronic kidney disease. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #45 receives dialysis. Resident #45's care plan, related to dialysis, dated 05/23/18 revealed the care plan identified blood pressure should not be taken in arm with graft and did not identify left or right arm. The care plan did not identify the dialysis access site. The care plan did not identify the name of the dialysis provider, location, contact information…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-08-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to revise one resident's care plan to address the care of the resident's contractures. This affected one (#13) of 20 residents reviewed during the investigation stage. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of Resident #13's medical record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, protein-calorie malnutrition, contracture left and right knee, muscle weakness, adult failure to thrive, abnormal posture, contracture of muscle; multiple sites, dysphagia, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, hyperlipidemia and hypertension. The resident's minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident required extensive to total dependence with activities of daily living and had functional limitation in range of motion on one side of her upper extremities. The assessment did not indicate the resident had any functional limitation in range of motion if either of her lower extremities. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-08-09 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview and record review the facility failed to provide adequate dialysis care, including the monitoring of the dialysis access site, to one resident (Resident #45). Resident #45 is the only resident at the facility receiving dialysis. The facility census is 62. Findings include: Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a brief interview mental status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating resident was cognitively intact. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including diabetes, congestive heart disease and chronic kidney disease. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #45 receives dialysis. Resident #45's care plan, related to dialysis, dated 05/23/18 revealed the care plan identified blood pressure should not be taken in arm with graft and did not identify left or right arm. The care plan did not identify the dialysis access site. The care plan did not identify the name of the dialysis provider, location, contact information or chair…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-08-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary medications by not adequately monitoring the resident and by not attempting non-pharmalogical interventions prior to administration of pain medication. This affected one resident (#30) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 62. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #30's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of essential hypertension, dementia without behavioral disturbances, dysphagia, paranoid personality disorder, functional intestinal disorder, lumbosacral fractures of spine and pelvis, anxiety disorder, and hypothyroidism. Review of Medication Administration Record (MAR) for August, 2018 noted an order was written by the resident's physician on 09/01/17 for Lasix 20 milligrams by mouth one time a day for diuretic, hold if blood pressure was less than 100/50. Blood pressure was not documented for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-08-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and review of Medscape Medication information, the facility failed to use antipsychotic medication to treat an appropriate specific diagnosed condition. This affected one (Resident #19) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a brief interview mental status (BIMS) score unable to be completed. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including epilepsy, anxiety disorder and Alzheimer's Disease. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed resident #19 received an antipsychotic medication. Additionally, the MDS identifies Resident #19 to has a diagnosis of anxiety disorder and Alzheimer's Disease. Resident #19's MDS does not identify a psychotic disorder or mood disorder. A care plan dated 7/3/18 relative to psychotropic medications revealed individualized interventions related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-08-09 · tag F0840 — isolatedEmploy or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure outside resources were provided when a urology consultation was ordered and an appointment was not made. This affected one resident (#23) of one resident reviewed for urinary catheters. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of Resident #23's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic kidney disease stage four, flaccid hemiplegia affecting right dominant side, sepsis, cognitive communication deficit, cerebral infarction, type two diabetes, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, benign prostatic hyperplasia, hypocalcemia, diabetic neuropathy, essential hypertension, altered mental status, and supra-pubic catheter. Review of Resident #30's medical record revealed an order written by the resident's physician on 07/27/18 to schedule a urology follow-up as soon as possible. Interview of with Resident #23's family member on 08/08/18 at 2:00 P.M. revealed the resident had an order for a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2019-10-31 · tag F0576 — widespreadEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interview and review of the local post office business hours, the facility failed to ensure mail was delivered on Saturdays. This affected eight (Residents #2, #8, #13, #37, #50, #53, #57 and #65) residents interviewed during the resident council meeting and had the potential to affect all 64 residents in the facility. Facility census was 64. Findings include: A resident council meeting was held on 10/30/19 at 10:13 A.M., and Residents #2, #8, #13, #37, #50, #53, #57 and #65 stated that no mail is delivered on Saturdays because no activity staff are in the building to deliver the mail to residents. During interview with Director of Activities (AD) #15 on 10/30/19 at 3:55 P.M., she stated she normally does not work on Saturdays, but other activity staff does work on weekends. AD #15 confirmed some residents have been asking for their mail on Saturdays. AD #15 was unable to provide a policy for mail being delivered to residents. Review of the local post office business hours revealed on Saturdays the post office is open from 9:00 A.M. through 1:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$197,584 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $197,584 — penalty dated 2023-08-23
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-09-15 for 13 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $302K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365920. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2022-10-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.