No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Liberty Retirement Community Of Lima INC

2440 Baton Rouge Avenue, Lima, OH 45805 · For profit - Corporation · 60 certified beds · (419) 331-2273 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0604) — cited Mar 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$25,495 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $25,495 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-19)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2311 Baton Rouge · (419) 228-3338 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1331 N Cole St · (419) 879-4327 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2154 Elida Rd Ste 4 · (419) 222-0181 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Northwestern Dr · (517) 677-8802 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2244 Baton Rouge Ave · (419) 225-6595

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased1.4%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight13.1%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms13.9%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury7.7%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened0.0%6.1%16.1%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.6%25.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.1%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.4%3.4%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.9%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.5%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.8%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine23.5%75.6%79.4%worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.38U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.20hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.1%CMS range 6.2–14.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.811.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.66
RN hours/ resident / day
1.17
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.44
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.27
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.38
RN hoursweekends
59.7%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 46.2 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.27 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.44 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.47 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

23
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-19)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-08)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2026-03-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) report review, hospital documentation review, death certificate review, resident interview, staff interview, review of facility's policy for Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), and review of facility's policy and procedure for In Case of Decannulation, the facility failed to ensure the necessary life-sustaining respiratory services were provided to residents who required invasive mechanical ventilation via tracheostomy (a hole in the front of the neck and into the windpipe) cannula. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and serious life-threatening harm on [DATE] at 1:40 A.M., when Resident #54 was found unresponsive without a pulse, with the tracheostomy cannula dislodged, and had been without oxygen for an unknown period of time. Staff were not trained in regards to reinserting the cannula or the procedure required to provide life-saving measures. Consequently, lifesaving CPR was not properly performed when Resident #54 was not provided with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-19 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's assessment and staff interview, the facility failed to assess the staffing needed to ensure resident receive the necessary care and treatment in the annual facility assessment. This has the potential to affect all 47 residents residing in the facility. The current census is 47. Findings include: Review of the facility assessment updated March 2026 revealed no staffing levels were included in the assessment. The facility assessment did not contain any documented information on staffing levels to ensure that there are a sufficient number of staff with appropriate competencies and skill sets necessary to care for residents' required care. The facility assessment lacked any documentation regarding specific staffing needs for each resident unit in the facility and adjustments necessary based on changes to its resident population. The facility assessment had no documentation of considerations on specific staffing needs for each shift based on any changes to its resident population.Interview on 03/17/26 at 2:00 P.M. with the Administrator verified the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, observations, resident interview, staff interview, review of Tuberculosis (TB) Risk Assessment, and review of policy, the facility failed to properly handle soiled linen for Resident #3. In addition, the facility failed follow enhanced barrier precautions for Residents #39 and #40. The facility failed to complete the TB risk assessment annually. This had the potential to affect all 47 residents. The facility census was 47.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, type two diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, and chronic kidney disease stage 3. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required set-up/clean up assistance with toileting, showering, and personal hygiene. Review of the care plan, revised on 10/01/25, revealed Resident #3 has mixed bladder incontinence. Interview on 03/11/26 at 12:19 P.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, census list review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided a clean and sanitary environment. This directly affected Resident #3 and potentially 14 additional residents (#2, #4, #9, #12, #13, #17, #21, #25, #33, #34, #35, #40, #42, #49) who resident on the same hall as Resident #3. The facility census was 47.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, type two diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, and chronic kidney disease stage 3.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required set-up/clean up assistance with toileting, showering, and personal hygiene. Review of the care plan, revised on 10/01/25, revealed Resident #3 has mixed bladder incontinence. Interventions include to check frequently and as required for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, resident food list review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident meals were free from choking hazards. This affected Resident #34 with the potential to affect an additional seven (#3, #4, #8, #15, #21, #41, and #46) residents who were served soup. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the facility followed the fall policy and provided documentation of the fall in the medical record. This affected one (#6) of seven residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 47.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #34 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, type two diabetes mellitus without complications, hypothyroidism, and major depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/07/25, revealed the resident was cognitively intact and set-up/clean-up for eating. Observation on 03/10/26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, review of manufacturer instructions, and review of facility policy the facility failed to administer medications per physician order and administer ophthalmic drugs as recommended. This affected two (#22 and #24) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 47.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #22 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia moderate without behavioral disturbance, essential hypertension, chronic kidney disease, mixed hyperlipidemia, unspecified glaucoma. Review of the MDS assessment, dated 02/26/26, revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of physician order, dated 11/29/25, revealed an order for brimodidine tartrate ophthalmic solution 0.1% with instructions to instill one drop in both eyes two times a day for eye drop. Review of physician order, dated 01/27/26, revealed an order for dorzolamide hci-timolol mal ophthalmic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff notified the physician and family representatives of residents' changes in condition. This affected two (#24 and #51) of two residents reviewed for notification. The current census is 47.Findings include:1. Record review for Resident #24 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #24 include fracture of the pelvis, chronic pain, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, epilepsy, and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of Resident #24's care plans dated 04/29/25 revealed a focus for cerebral vascular accident related to hypertension. Interventions include to monitor vital signs and notify medical doctor of significant abnormalities, give medications as ordered. Review of physician orders dated 11/21/25 revealed Resident #24 was to be administered clonidine 0.1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraint. This affected one (#30) of one resident reviewed for phyiscal restraint. The facility census was 47. Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 10/06/23. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia, hyperlipidemia, major depressive disorder recurrent, anxiety disorder, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/02/26, revealed the resident is severely cognitively impaired and requires set-up/clean-up assistance with eating. Resident #30 is dependent for toileting, showering, and personal hygiene. Resident #30 had occasionally behaviors of physical aggression, verbal aggression, and other behaviors in addition to rejection of care and wandering. Observation on 03/11/26 at 10:34 A.M. revealed Resident #30 was alert in a wheelchair sitting at the dining room table. Resident #30's wheelchair was locked on the left side.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to have documentation of a resident's discharge disposition in the medical record. This affected one (#53) of three closed records reviewed for discharge. The census was 47. Findings include:Review of Resident #53's closed medical revealed and admission date of 09/27/24. Diagnoses listed included breast cancer, hypertension, major depressive disorder, and osteoarthritis. Resident #53 was discharged on 08/19/25.Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #53 was cognitively intact.Further review of Resident #53's closed medical record revealed no documentation of Resident #53's discharge disposition. There was not a documented recapitulation of Resident #53's stay and there weren't any progress notes concerning discharge arrangements.Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 03/11/26 at 3:05 P.M. confirmed there was not any documentation of Resident #53's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to document a resident's discharge information in the medical records including appropriate information for a resident's discharge to a hospital. This affected one (#56) of six residents reviewed for discharges. The current census is 47.Findings include:Record review for Resident #56 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility originally on 06/06/24, re-admitted after a hospital stay on 09/25/25 and discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #56 included chronic pain, end stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis, and heart disease.Review of Resident #56's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS)assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had mildly impaired cognition.Review of Resident #56's family representative contact information revealed the resident's first contact was his sister followed by another sister and as the 3rd contact his brother.Review of Resident #56's progress notes dated 11/11/25 at 6:18 A.M., revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person care plan related to skin impairment. This affected one (#10) of three residents reviewed for skin breakdown. The facility census was 47.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 09/04/25 with medical diagnoses of cerebral infarction with left hemiplegia, mood disorder, hypertension (HTN) and epilepsy. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/31/25, indicated Resident #10 had moderate cognitive impairment and required partial/moderate staff assistance with toilet hygiene, bathing and supervision with bed mobility and transfers. Review of the MDS revealed no skin issues were noted.Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed documentation on shower sheets dated 01/02/26, 01/07/26, 01/09/26, 01/16/26, 01/24/26, and 01/30/26 which stated Resident #10 was noted to have redness under bilateral breasts and to her groin area which had worsened. The shower sheets indicated lotion…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 39 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observations, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide activities to meet the resident's needs and cognitive capabilities. This affected one (#40) of three residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 47.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 09/29/20 with medical diagnoses of cerebral palsy (CP), profound intellectual disabilities, seizures, hypertension, and dysphagia. Review of an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/11/26, indicated Resident #40 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent upon staff for all activities of daily living. Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed a care plan dated 01/23/24 that stated Resident #40 was dependent upon staff for emotional, physical, spiritual, creative, and community activities and social well-being related to CP and intellectual disabilities with a goal to maintain involvement in cognitive stimulation, and social activities as desired. Interventions included inviting Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, observation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to continually assess a surgical wound and schedule recommended follow up wound clinic appointments for Resident #02; failed to ensure accurate assessment of skin impairment and initiate treatment timely for a rash for Resident #10; and the facility failed to document the cause of wound injury/trauma area for Resident #51. This affected three (#02, #10, and #51) of four residents reviewed for skin assessments and treatments. The facility census was 47. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #02 revealed an admission date of 09/15/25, with medical diagnoses of acute osteomyelitis, diabetes mellitus (DM), peripheral vascular disease (PVD), congestive heart failure (CHF) and anemia. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #02 discharged to hospital on [DATE], readmitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged to the hospital on [DATE], readmitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged to the hospital…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the medical record review, hospital report review, staff interview and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure the necessary care and treatment was provided when a resident with a urinary catheter displayed symptoms of a urinary tract infection (UTI). This affected one (#51) out of two residents reviewed for care and treatment of urinary catheters. The facility census was 47.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed an admission date of 05/14/24 with medical diagnoses of diabetes mellitus, down's syndrome, Hirschsprung's disease, and obstructive and reflex uropathy. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #51 was discharged from the facility on 07/06/25 to hospital for evaluation of ongoing right abdominal pain and was admitted to the hospital with peptic ulcer disease, cholecystitis and UTI. Review of Resident #51's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/18/25, indicated Resident #51 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent upon staff for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of medical records and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed by a physician within the first 30 days after admission. This affected one (#28) of three residents reviewed for physician visits. The census was 47. Findings include:Review of Resident #28 medical record revealed an admission date of 06/25/25. Diagnoses listed included end stage renal disease, sexual dysfunction, major depressive disorder, and liver cirrhosis.Review of a quarterly Minimum data Set (MDS) revealed Resident #28 was cognitively intact and received dialysis.Further review of Resident #28's medical record revealed the first documented physician assessment was on 12/10/25. Resident #28 had been assessed by a nurse practitioner (NP) and physician (PA) assistant prior to 12/10/25.Interview with MDS Nurse #201 on 03/16/26 at 2:15 P.M. confirmed Resident #28 had not been assessed within the first 30 days by a physician. The first time Resident #28 was assessed by a physician at the facility was 12/10/25.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate and timely response to the pharmacist drug regimen reviews. This affected two (#02 and #04) residents out of the five residents reviewed for pharmacy reviews. The facility census was 47.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #02 revealed an admission date of 09/15/25 with medical diagnoses of acute osteomyelitis, diabetes mellitus (DM), peripheral vascular disease (PVD), congestive heart failure (CHF) and anemia. Review of the medical record for Resident #02 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/20/26, which indicated Resident #02 was cognitively intact and was dependent upon staff for toileting, bathing, and transfers, and required substantial/maximum staff assistance with bed mobility. Review of the medical record for Resident #02 revealed a pharmacy recommendation dated 12/09/25 to adjust the administration time of the Doxycycline (antibiotic)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to have a justified use of an antibiotic. This affected two (#39and #40) of two residents reviewed for antibotics. The census was 47. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #39's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/06/22. Diagnoses listed included hemiplegia, type two diabetes mellitus, bladder dysfunction, and hypertension. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #39 was cognitively intact, had an indwelling urinary catheter, and had received an antibiotic. Review of physician orders revealed an order dated 07/23/25 for Cephalexin (antibiotic) oral tablet 500 milligrams (mg) give one tablet two times a day for prevention of infection. The end date was indefinite. A pharmacy note attached to the order was please clarify a stop date. Review of medication administration records (MAR) revealed Cephalexin was administered 07/24/25 through 03/11/26.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medications errors. This affected four (#3, #10, #51 and #53) residents out of five residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 47.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 09/04/25 with medical diagnoses of cerebral infarction with left hemiplegia, mood disorder, hypertension (HTN) and epilepsy. Review of a quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/31/25, which indicated Resident #10 had moderate cognitive impairment and required partial/moderate staff assistance with toilet hygiene, bathing and supervision with bed mobility and transfers.Review of a nurses note dated 03/02/26 at 7:02 P.M. stated Resident #10's significant other requested to take Resident #10 to Urgent Care due to excoriation under breasts and new rash covering extremities and torso. Review of a nurse's note dated 03/02/26 at 9:53…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure insulin multi-use vials were dated. This affected two residents' (#4 and #25) insulin vials observed in a medication cart. The facility also failed to ensure multi-dose insulin vials were discarded 28 days after the opened date. This affected one resident's (#12) insulin vial observed a medication cart. The facility also failed to ensure medications were stored in their original containers. This affected one medication cart of two observed. The census was 47.Findings include:Observation of the 600 hall medication cart on 03/16/26 at 10:31 A.M. revealed two multi-dose insulin vials were open and not dated. A 10 milliliter (ml) vial of Lantus (long-acting insulin) belonging to Resident #4 was opened and undated. A 10 ml vial of Novolog (rapid-acting insulin) belonging to Resident #25 was opened and undated. A 10 ml vial of Humalog (fast-acting insulin) for Resident #12 was dated as being opened on 02/14/26. Fifteen unidentified small round yellow pills were loose in the compartment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to notify the physician of an abnormal laboratory (lab) results timely. This affected one (#51) resident of one residents reviewed for laboratory test. The facility census was 47.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed an admission date of 05/14/24 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, Down's Syndrome, Hirschsprung's disease, and morbid obesity. Resident #51 discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and did not return to the facility. Review of an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/18/25,indicated Resident #51 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent upon staff for activities of daily living. The MDS indicated Resident #51 had an indwelling catheter. Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed a physician order dated 06/11/25 for urinalysis (UA). Review of the medical record revealed a UA culture was completed on 06/14/25 and indicated the culture was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received dental services. This affected one (#34) of two residents reviewed for dental service. The facility census was 47.Review of the medical record revealed Resident #34 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, type two diabetes mellitus without complications, hypothyroidism, and major depressive disorder.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/07/25, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the care plan, revised on 05/12/25, revealed Resident #34 had potential for oral/dental health problems due to poor oral hygiene. Interventions included to coordinate arrangements for dental care as needed/as ordered and monitor/document/report as needed any signs and symptoms of oral problems needing attention. Interview on 03/09/26 at 10:37 A.M. with Resident #34 revealed a few months after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, review of meal ticket, and review of facility policy revealed Resident #4 did not receive food items per preference. This affected one (#4) of four residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 47. Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #4 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus without complications, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, schizoid personality disorder, paraplegia, and malignant neoplasm of unspecified female breast.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/08/26, revealed the resident was cognitively intact.Review of the meal ticket, dated 03/09/26, breakfast meal, verified Resident #4 was to receive two 2% milks, cranberry juice, and yogurt.Observation on 03/09/26 at approximately 7:45 A.M. revealed Resident #4 refused the meal tray due to not having requested items. Observation of the meal tray revealed no milk or cranberry juice was on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide adaptive eating utensils. This affected one (#4) of one resident reviewed for adaptative equipment. The facility census was 47. Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #4 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus without complications, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, schizoid personality disorder, paraplegia, and malignant neoplasm of unspecified female breast.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/08/26, revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required set-up/clean up with eating.Review of the meal ticket, dated 03/09/26 breakfast meal, verified Resident #4 was to receive built-up utensils (1 each).Observation on 03/09/26 at approximately 7:45 A.M. revealed Resident #4 built-up utensils were not on the meal tray.Review of the meal ticket, dated 03/10/26 lunch meal, verified Resident #4 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident, family, and staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to timely treat and assess the resident's pressure wounds. This affected two Residents (#10 and #12) of three residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 43. Findings include: 1) Review of medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 01/25/24. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus type II, and chronic venous insufficiency. The resident was hospitalized on [DATE] and did not return. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 had cognitive impairment. Resident #10 was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, bed mobility, and transfers. Review of the care plan revealed potential for wounds or pressure ulcer development related to end stage renal disease, venous insufficiency and a past history of pressure ulcers. Interventions included to administer treatments as ordered and monitor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, pharmacy staff interview, facility staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were administered as physician ordered, resulting in a significant medication error. This affected one (Resident #10) of one resident reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 43. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #10 revealed admission date of 01/25/24. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, congestive heart failure, and hypertension. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 had impaired cognition. Review of the physician orders dated 11/01/24 revealed an order for Diltiazem (treats hypertension) extended release 180 milligrams (mg) daily. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) from 11/01/24 to 11/07/24 revealed Diltiazem was administered on 11/01/24 and 11/06/24. It was not documented as administered on 11/02/24, 11/03/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided meals according to their preferences. This affected two residents (#20 and #21) of three residents reviewed for meal service. The facility census was 42. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/15/24. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, dysphagia, type II diabetes, gout and convulsions. Review of Resident #20's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine indicating Resident #20 was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #20 displayed no behaviors during the review period. Resident #20 had no weight changes at the time of the review. Review of Resident #20's care plan revised 10/21/24 revealed supports and interventions for self-care deficit, limited physical mobility, resistant to care, potential for verbal aggression, impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of records, facility policy and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately document and treat wounds. This affected one (#10) of three residents reviewed. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #10 revealed admission date of 01/26/24. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, dialysis dependent, anemia, dementia without behaviors, and early onset Alzheimer's Disease. The resident was discharged on 06/17/24 to the hospital and did not return. The discharge return anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed severely impaired cognition. She required set up assistance for eating and was dependent on bed mobility, transfers and toileting hygiene. No pressure ulcer was documented. A care plan for potential for wounds or pressure development was initiated on 01/29/24 with interventions which included weekly treatment documentation to include measurement of each area of skins breakdown in width, length,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of records, facility policy and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately document and treat pressure wounds. This affected one (#10) of three residents reviewed. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #10 revealed admission date of 01/26/24. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, dialysis dependent, anemia, dementia without behaviors, and early onset Alzheimer's Disease. The resident was discharged on 06/17/24 to the hospital and did not return. The discharge return anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed severely impaired cognition. She required set up assistance for eating and was dependent on bed mobility, transfers and toileting hygiene. No pressure ulcer was documented. A care plan for potential for wounds or pressure development was initiated on 01/29/24 with interventions which included weekly treatment documentation to include measurement of each area of skins breakdown in width,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-05-08 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel files, review of facility documentation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to employ a qualified dietary manager. This affected all residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility identified two residents (#24 and #48) who did not receive food by mouth. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Review of personnel files revealed Dietary Manager #340 was hired on 06/09/23 and was promoted to the role of Dietary Manager on 04/21/24. Dietary Manager #340 did not have a Servesafe certification. Review of facility provided documentation revealed former Dietary Manager #380 was no longer employed at the facility effective 04/01/24. Interview on 05/05/24 at 12:42 P.M., with Dietary Manager #340 revealed she was in the process of taking the ServeSafe course with plans to complete it by the end of the month. Interview on 05/05/24 at 1:10 P.M., with Resident Care Coordinator #327 verified Dietary Manager #340 did not have the ServeSafe certification.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, review of the dishwasher manual, review of the dishwasher temperature log, and policies review, the facility failed to appropriately store food and ensure the dishwasher was sanitizing. This had the potential to affect all residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility identified two (#24 and #48) residents who do not receive food by mouth. The facility census was 51. Findings include: 1. Observation of the initial kitchen tour on 05/05/24 on 8:33 A.M., revealed a prepackage of frozen meatloaf thawing in the refrigerator with a sticky note on it that stated use for dinner on 04/25/24, hard boiled eggs to be discarded on 04/29/24, and bologna to be discarded on 04/29/24. There were also multiple boxes of keep frozen food such a pork links, meatloaf, and chicken fillets in the refrigerator. In the freezer there was an open to air bag of beef fritters and on the floor were three cracked eggs with no shells in different areas of the freezer. In the storage area were two large trays with unfrosted cupcakes covered with cardboard. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, observations, review of Legionella Water Management Plan, and the review of policy, the facility failed to ensure procedures were followed for Legionella prevention and ensure staff properly transported soiled lines in common areas. This had the potential to affect all 51 residents. The census was 51. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's, Legionella Water Management Plan updated 10/02/23 revealed control measures and monitoring included all sinks/showers/toilets would be visually checked daily, eye wash stations visually checked weekly and ice machines would be visually checked monthly. Upon request for records of the checks being completed, no records were provided. Interview on 05/07/24 at 4:22 P.M., with Maintenance Director #333 verified he was unable to provide documentation the visual checks had been completed. 2. Observation on 05/06/24 at 8:05 A.M., revealed State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #377 carrying soiled linen in a bundle, in one hand, next to her body and a soiled brief in the other hand, down the hallway, into the soiled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-05-08 · tag F0923 — widespread
    Have enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, ombudsman interview, family interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure pungent smells of urine did not permeate into common areas and dining room. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Observation on 05/06/24 at 7:25 A.M., of 300/400 hall nurses station/common area into the dining room revealed permeating urine odor with no residents in the area. Observation on 05/06/24 at 8:50 A.M., of 600 [NAME] hallway revealed permeating urine smell at the end of the hallway. Observation on 05/06/24 at 10:50 A.M., of 300/400 hall nurses station revealed urine odor was lightly detected. better at this time. When rounding the corner to the common area and dining room urine smell detected. Observation on 05/06/24 at 4:00 P.M., of 300/400 hall common area and dining room revealed faint urine odor. Observation on 05/07/24 at 7:24 A.M., revealed permeating urine odor still present in the 300/400 common area with no residents around in the area. On the way back through the 300/400 hall common…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident diet list review, resident interview, resident representative interview, staff interviews, and review of policies, the facility failed to provide residents a dignified dining experience. This had the potential to affect all residents except 15 residents (#1, #3, #6, #18, #23, #24, #27, #30, #32, #34, #37, #41, #47 #48, and #198) who did not receive food by mouth and residents with a puree or mechanical soft diet. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Observation of the lunch meal on 05/05/24 revealed the meal included baked chicken, mashed potatoes, green beans, bread and butter, and fruit. Continued observation revealed the eating utensils residents received only included a fork and spoon. Residents were observed attempting to cut the chicken with a fork and spoon, shredding the chicken breast with a fork, or asking for assistance. Interview on 05/05/24 at 12:10 P.M., with an unidentified resident in the dining room revealed the chicken was hard to cut without a knife.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-08 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — pattern
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident family interview, staff interview, review of the activities calendar, review of the facility brochure, and review of policy, revealed the facility failed to provide appropriate and engaging activities in the memory care unit. This affected five residents (#20, #30, #36, #38, and #43) were reviewed with the potential to affect an additional five (#3, #24, #31, #32, and #34) residents in the memory care unit. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Review of the memory care activity calendar, dated 05/05/24 revealed two scheduled activities including at 12:00 P.M. root beer floats and 2:00 P.M. church. On 05/06/24, there were three scheduled activities including 9:00 A.M. Good Morning, 10:00 A.M. Shopping, and 3:00 P.M. Game Day (cards). On 05/07/24, three activities were scheduled including 9:00 A.M. Good Morning, 12:00 P.M. Book Swap, and 3:00 P.M. Book Read. Review of the facility brochure revealed Memory Care program is highlighted and stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-08 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the menu, observation, staff interview, review of census sheet, review of the dietary spreadsheet, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed including offering appropriate substitutions for 12 (#5, #21, #28, #27, #33, #40, #42, #47, #197, #198, #199, and #243) residents and serving sizes for 10 (#3, #20, #24, #30, #31, #32, #34, #36, #38, and #43) residents. The facility census was 51. Findings include: 1. Review of the 05/05/25 lunch meal revealed included baked chicken, mashed potatoes, green beans, bread and butter, and fruit. Observation on 05/05/24 at 12:31 P.M., of the lunch meal revealed the 300 and 400 hall resident cart meals included baked chicken, rice, pasta salad, and fruit. Observation revealed 12 (#5, #21, #28, #27, #33, #40, #42, #47, #197, #198, #199, and #243) residents were served the incorrect substitute. Interview on 05/05/24 at 12:35 P.M., with Dietary Aide #313 revealed they had run out of Italian green beans so she served left over pasta salad and they had also run out of mashed potatoes and determined to serve…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, and facility policy the facility failed to reasonably accommodate a resident's requests. This affected one (#197) of one resident reviewed for choices. The census was 51. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #197 was initially admitted on [DATE] with re-entry on 05/01/24. Diagnoses included other acute osteomyelitis left shoulder, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, bipolar disorder, quadriplegia, colostomy status, primary osteoarthritis, hypothyroidism, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/14/24, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #197 required substantial/maximum assistance for eating and dependent on staff for bed mobility. Review of the most recent care plan revealed the resident had a care plan for activities of daily living (ADL) care and required weight bearing assistance by staff to eat, the facility was to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, policy review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure code status documentation was addressed timely. This affected one (#247) of 19 reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 51. Findings included: Review of medical record for Resident #247 revealed admission date of 04/29/24. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, malignant neoplasm of left breast, secondary malignant neoplasm of brain, depression and anxiety. The resident remained at the facility. Observation and interview on 05/05/24 at 3:36 P.M., with Registered Nurse (RN) #354 verified there was no code status information in Resident #247's hard chart. The side of the hard chart and paper behind the advance directive tab was labeled as Comfort Care (CC). There was an order for Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care Arrest (DNR-CCA) dated 04/29/24 in the electronic charting. RN #354 explained sometimes the resident information will not be placed in the hard chart until after therapy reviews the chart. Interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, nurse practitioner interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent skin impairment timely for a resident with stage 4 pressure ulcers and ensure would measurements were completed upon readmission. This affected one (#197) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #197 was initially admitted on [DATE] with re-entry on 05/01/24. Diagnoses included other acute osteomyelitis left shoulder, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, bipolar disorder, quadriplegia, colostomy status, primary osteoarthritis, hypothyroidism, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/14/24, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #197 was dependent on staff for bed mobility, upper and lower body extremity dressing. Review of the most recent care plan revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for residents while they were smoking. This affected two (#1 and #6) of two residents reviewed for smoking. The facility identified five residents who smoke. The facility census was 51. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #1 revealed admission date of 07/19/18, with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, seizures, hemiplegia affecting right dominant side, and major depressive disorder. Review of minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a brief interview of mental status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated cognitively intact. Resident #1 was dependent on staff for activities of daily living. Review of care plan dated 04/04/24 revealed Resident #1 is a smoker and often refuses to wear smoking apron. Interventions included the resident has been assessed and requires supervision while smoking, and smoking apron…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) National Library of Medicine (NLM), the facility failed to monitor medication for potential side effects, toxicity and/or effectiveness. This affected one (#28) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #28 revealed admission date of 07/13/23. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including Parkinsonism, chronic kidney disease, hyperlipidemia and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed he had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating impaired cognition. He required supervision for bed mobility, transfers, toileting and eating. Review of the physician orders revealed an order for Pravastatin (cholesterol) 40 milligrams (mg). Give one tablet at bedtime for hyperlipidemia. Record review of the physician orders for Resident #28…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0772 — isolated
    Have an agreement with an approved laboratory to obtain services, if on-site laboratory services aren't provided.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure laboratory (lab) test were completed per physician orders. This affected three (#10, #17 and #26) of five residents reviewed for laboratory test. The facility census was 51. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #10 revealed admission date of 11/25/12, with diagnoses including neuropathy, diabetes, cerebral infarction, major depressive disorder, chronic pain, hallucinations, chronic embolism and thrombosis of unspecified vein, and pure hypercholesterolemia. Review of minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a brief interview of mental status (BIMS) score of 12 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #10 required extensive assistance to full dependence on staff for activities of daily living. Review of current monthly physician orders for May 2024 revealed orders for Complete Blood Count (CBC), Basic Metabolic Panel (BMP), Hepatic Panel, and Lipid Panel every three months (March, June,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the menu, observation, review of the recipe, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure pureed foods were made of appropriate consistency. This affected two (#24 and #48) residents who the facility identified as receiving a pureed diet. The census was 51. Findings include: Review of the lunch menu on 05/06/24 revealed the lunch included meatballs, noodles, mixed vegetables, and bread and butter. Review of the pureed meatloaf recipe revealed the recipe included meatloaf, beef base, hot water, and food thickener. Instructions included to prepare meatloaf in food processer, add broth and process until a smooth texture, add thickener and process briefly until mixed. Measurements of liquid and thickener may be adjusted to achieve desired texture. Observation on 05/06/24 at 10:50 A.M. revealed the facility substituted meatballs for meatloaf. Dietary Aide #321 placed two servings of meatloaf, two spoonsful of thickener, and an unknown amount of hot water (approximately half of a mug) in the blender. The meal was blended for approximately one to two minutes then…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, review of the facility kitchen cleaning schedule checklist, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen environment. This had the potential to affect 47 residents in the facility. Resident #8 received no food by mouth and thus no food from the kitchen. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Observation on 12/29/23 at 7:22 A.M. of the facility kitchen found the three-sink dishwashing system was not in use. Food debris and a wet towel with brown areas and brown specks was found under it. In addition, a wet area with three or four wet towels and steam table tray was observed on the floor under a steam oven. Interview on 12/29/23 at 7:25 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #157 verified there was a wet soiled towel under the dishwashing sink and wet towels and tray under the steam oven. DM #157 reported there had been a drain leak under the sink so the towel was there to absorb the water. DM #157 reported the drain leak had been repaired but they had not removed the towel. DM #157 also verified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and policy review, facility failed to ensure residents were properly supervised while smoking and smoking aprons were applied as required. This affected three (#1, #10, and #37) of three reviewed for smoking. The facility failed to sure a resident was transferred safely with a mechanical lift. This affected one (#48) of one resident reviewed for transfers. The facility census was 47. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #1 revealed admission date 07/19/18, with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dysphagia, chronic kidney disease, seizures, idiopathic progressive neuropathy, right foot drop, nicotine dependence cigarettes, major depressive disorder, hypertension, and anxiety. Review of Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #1 dated 02/02/23 revealed brief interview of mental status (BIMS) score of 13 which indicated cognitively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, resident interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received showers per personal preference on shower days. This affected one (#13) of three residents reviewed for choices. The facility census was 47. Findings include: 1.Review of Medical Record for Resident #13 revealed admission date 01/25/22, with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, dysphagia, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, generalized anxiety disorder, chronic gout, depression, type two diabetes, and morbid obesity. Review of Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed brief interview of mental status (BIMS) score of 14 which indicated cognitively intact. Resident required extensive assistance for activities of daily living (ADL's). Review of Care Plan dated 12/08/22 for Resident #13 revealed the resident had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to chronic respiratory failure, dysphagia, obesity, hypertension, hypothyroidism, anxiety,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-20 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided care and treatment to maintain foot health. This affected one (#35) of one resident reviewed for foot care. The facility census was 47. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #35 revealed admission date of 12/16/20, with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, anxiety, depression, and dementia with behavioral disturbances. The resident remains in the facility. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was rarely/never understood with severely impaired cognition. She required extensive one person assistance for bed mobility, transfers, eating toileting and personal hygiene. Review of the care plan for actual impairment to skin integrity related to left second toe with drainage and edema. Interventions included but were not limited to monitor and document size and treatment of skin injury. Report failure to heal, signs and symptoms of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an antianxiety medication, which was ordered as needed (PRN), had an end date for use. The facility also failed to offer non-pharmacological interventions prior to administration of the PRN antianxiety medication. This affected one (#48) of the five residents reviewed for psychotropic medication use. The facility census was 47. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 03/28/23, with medical diagnoses of end stage renal disease (ESRD), chronic respiratory failure, diabetes mellitus, anxiety, and dependence upon dialysis. Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #48 was cognitively intact and required extensive assist with bed mobility, dressing, toileting and was dependent upon staff for transfers. The MDS indicated Resident #48 received two days of antianxiety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-20 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure timely wound culture was obtained per physician orders. This affected one (#35) of one resident reviewed for laboratory test. The facility census was 47. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #35 revealed admission date of 12/16/20, with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, anxiety, depression, and dementia with behavioral disturbances. The resident remains in the facility. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was rarely/never understood with severely impaired cognition. She required extensive one person assistance for bed mobility, transfers, eating toileting and personal hygiene. Review of the care plan for actual impairment to skin integrity related to left second toe with drainage and edema. Interventions included but were not limited to monitor and document size and treatment of skin injury. Report failure to heal, signs and symptoms of infections…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-20 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to assess and provide rehabilitation services as ordered. This affected one (#203) resident of the two residents reviewed for rehabilitation services. The facility census was 47. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #203 revealed an admission date of 04/11/23, with medical diagnoses of acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), malignant neoplasm of retromolar area, and anxiety. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #203's payer source was Medicaid. Review of the medical record for Resident #203 revealed a nursing admission assessment, dated 04/11/23, which stated Resident #203 was alert and oriented to person, place, time, and situation and was dependent upon staff for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, and extensive assist for dressing and grooming. Review of the medical record for Resident #203 revealed hospital discharge orders, dated 04/11/23, for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-05-08 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on resident interviews, staff interview, and observation, the facility failed to prominently post where state survey results were located for residents to view. This had the potential to affect all 51 residents. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Interview on 05/07/24 at 2:19 P.M., with Residents (#2, #4, #26, #29, and #35) who attended the resident group meeting denied knowing where to find the state survey results. Observation on 05/07/24 at 2:55 P.M., of hallway posting board revealed no mention of where to find the state survey results. Observation of the postings on the front desk where you enter the facility revealed no documentation regarding the location of the state survey results book. Interview on 05/07/24 at 2:58 P.M., with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified there was no posting for the residents or their families for locating the state survey results. DON produced the state survey results book that was located at the front desk.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$25,495 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $25,495 — penalty dated 2026-03-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BLACK-KUREK, LINDAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL90%since 04/21/2017
CARPENTER, BRUCEIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER10%since 04/21/2017

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-3.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$950K
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 59%Medicare 3%Other / private 38%

This home reported $950K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$329per resident / day
operating cost
$10,004per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$320per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365936. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next