Lima Convalescent Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 102 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 74.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 72 beds and averages 66.5 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.90 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.25 on weekdays — 29% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.83 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food preparation and storage was maintained. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Observation during initial kitchen tour on 04/21/25 between 8:20 A.M. to 8:40 A.M. revealed the stand-up freezer had one bag of French fries and one bag of chicken that were opened, unsealed, unlabeled, and undated, the walk-in freezer had two stacks of boxes sitting on the floor of the freezer. The two stacks contained the following food: four boxes were [NAME] frozen cakes and one box of wild caught cod. Concurrent observation revealed [NAME] #201 who prepared and served breakfast was not wearing a hat or hairnet, or hairnet covering his full beard. Interview during initial tour with Assistant Dietary Manager (ADM) #197 verified the boxes on the floor in the walk-in freezer, [NAME] #197 not wearing hairnet, and the opened, unsealed, undated, and unlabeled food in the stand-up…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of medical record for Resident #8 revealed admission date of 7/4/23 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, dehydration, depression, non-pressure chronic ulcer of lower leg, and chronic osteomyelitis of her right ankle and foot. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she had intact cognition and required extensive one person assistance for bed mobility, transfers, limited assistance with toileting and supervision for eating. Observation on 04/22/25 at 12:54 P.M. of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #124 completing the dressing change to right heel revealed LPN #124 removed the stocking of right leg of Resident #8. LPN #124 proceeded to remove the dressing from her right heel. She then disposed of the dressing into the trash can. Without removing her gloves, LPN #124 retrieved a bottle of saline with her right hand and a four by four with her left. She placed she held the four by four in her left hand under the heel and used her right hand to pour the saline over the wound to wash…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure care plans were accurate. This affected four (#8, #9, #26, #54) of 23 residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 66. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #8 revealed admission date of 07/04/23 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, dehydration, depression, non-pressure chronic ulcer of lower leg, and chronic osteomyelitis of her right ankle and foot. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she had intact cognition and required extensive one person assistance for bed mobility, transfers, limited assistance with toileting and supervision for eating. Record review revealed there was no plan of care for a pressure ulcer. Review of the 04/01/25 wound center documentation revealed a stage three pressure injury to her right heel. Interview on 04/24/25 at 9:43 A.M. with MDS Nurse #200 verified there was no pressure wound care plan. 2. Review of medical record for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident's dignity was maintained. This affected one resident (#47) of one resident reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #47 revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of hypertension and osteoarthritis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #47 revealed she was cognitively intact and required supervision assistance for showering and personal hygiene. Review of the care plan revised 04/25 for Resident #47 revealed she was care planned for self-care deficit related to decreased activities of daily living (ADL), activity intolerance, and arthritis with interventions of one to two assist for care, ADLs, and monitor the five P's (pain, potty, position, proximity of items, and personal needs) during rounding Observation on 04/21/25 at 11:48 A.M. of Resident #47 revealed chin hair at least one quarter of an inch…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff and resident interview, and facility policy the facility failed to follow physician orders for wound care. This affected one resident (#8) of three reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #8 revealed admission date of 07/04/23 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, dehydration, depression, non-pressure chronic ulcer of lower leg, and chronic osteomyelitis of her right ankle and foot. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she had intact cognition and required extensive one person assistance for bed mobility, transfers, limited assistance with toileting and supervision for eating. Review of the physician orders revealed an order for left forearm to keep steri-strips (skin closure) in place until healed. Cover the wound with dressing (Island) once daily and discontinue when healed with a start date of 04/13/25. Observation on 04/22/25 at 12:54 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record reviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to accurately assess wounds and failed to complete treatments as ordered. This affected one (Resident #8) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 07/04/23 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, dehydration, depression, non-pressure chronic ulcer of lower leg, and chronic osteomyelitis of her right ankle and foot. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she had intact cognition and required extensive one person assistance for bed mobility, transfers, limited assistance with toileting, and supervision for eating. Review of the care plan revealed no current plan of care for a pressure wound. Review of the 03/01/25 skin and wound assessment revealed documentation of type of wound as other and measuring three centimeters (cm) in diameter, scab to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, review of the nursing schedule, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to complete resident's activities of daily living. This affected one resident (#34) of 24 reviewed for sufficient staffing. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 05/30/23 with diagnoses of congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and cerebral vascular accident (CVA) (stroke). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #34 revealed she was cognitively intact and was dependent for showering. Review of the current physician orders for 04/25 for Resident #34 revealed she had ordered showers on Tuesday and Friday on night shift. Review of the care plan revised 02/25 for Resident #34 revealed she was care planned for self-care deficit related to decreased activities of daily living (ADL) function and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-08-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, resident and staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to accommodate resident needs by ensuring the resident's call lights were within reach. This affected four (#24, #30, #34, and #122) out five residents sampled for accessibility of call lights. Facility census was 71. Findings include: Observation on 08/08/22 at 4:55 P.M. revealed Resident #122 was sitting up in bed with her dinner tray in front of her. Resident #122 stated she did not like what they served her for dinner. When asked if she had told staff she stated she couldn't tell staff due to no being able to reach her call light. Resident #122's call light was on the bottom bar of the enabler side rail with the button pointing to the floor out of the reach of the resident. On 08/08/22 at 5:00 P.M. an interview with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #224 verified Resident #122 could not reach her call light. On 08/09/22 at 2:10 P.M. observations revealed Resident #30 was lying in bed. Resident #30 stated she had a wet depends on that she couldn't get rid of. When asked if her depends…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, resident and staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents with indwelling catheters had their catheters managed in a dignified manner. This affected two (#222 and #54) of the three residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 71. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #222's medical record revealed an admission date 07/28/22. Diagnoses included fracture around internal right hip joint subsequent encounter. Review of Resident #222's Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed an admission MDS was in progress. Review of Resident #222's admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #222 was admitted to the facility from the hospital following a fall at home. Resident #222 had an indwelling catheter. Resident #222 used a manual wheelchair for mobility. Interview on 08/08/22 at 9:56 A.M. with Resident #222 revealed she had a catheter. Coinciding observation of her catheter bag found it attached under her wheelchair and the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-08-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, resident and staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure hand splints were applied as recommended by therapy and/or ordered by the physician. This affected two (#29 and #30) two residents reviewed for limited range of motion. The facility census was 71. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #29's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including spastic hemiplegia affecting his left non dominant side, major depressive disorder, osteoarthritis, vascular dementia, seizure disorders, anemia, and diabetes type II. Review of Resident #29's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six revealing he has a severe cognitive deficits. Resident #29 displayed physical behaviors toward others on one to three days of the assessment. Resident #29 is totally dependent for all activities of daily living except eating which he requires…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH