Green Meadows Skilled Nursing And Rehab
7770 Columbus Road NE, Louisville, OH 44641 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 110 certified beds · (330) 875-1456 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Oct 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $28,763 in federal fines (most recent 2023-12-20)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.9% | 5.3% | 15.4% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.6% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 53.3% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.4% | 3.2% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.9% | 6.1% | 16.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.8% | 25.5% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.1% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.9% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 29.8% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.8% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.4% | 1.2% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.6% | 75.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.9% | 24.9% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 4.9% | 12.9% | 12.0% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 59 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 51.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.0%CMS range 37.2–61.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 7.6–16.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 51.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 54.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 40.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 96.2% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.6%CMS range 3.1–10.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.20 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 93.3 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.75 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.35 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.92 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
52 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident photographs, facility fall log review, resident medical record review, facility policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to appropriately identify and assess an acute change in Resident #98's condition (including altered mental status/and increased falls) to provide timely medical intervention/treatment for the resident. This affected one resident (#98) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 98. Actual harm occurred on 11/29/23 when Resident #98, who experienced an acute change in condition including three falls within an hour (between 8:00 A.M. and 9:00 A.M.), was not comprehensively assessed or provided timely medical evaluation/intervention. On 11/29/23 at approximately 2:42 P.M., following a fourth fall on this date, Resident #98 was transferred to the local emergency department for evaluation where she was assessed to have an elevated temperature of 103.1 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and was admitted for treatment of a urinary tract infection. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-21 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to maintain sufficient levels of staff to meet the total care needs of all residents. This affected five residents (#109, #113, #114, and #184) of five residents reviewed for personal care services and had the potential to affect all 93 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Observation and interview on 05/18/26 at 10:10 A.M. during the facility entry conference with Administrator and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #213 revealed the facility Director of Nursing (DON) was on vacation this week and the facility did not currently have the assistant director of nursing (ADON) position filled. Continued observation during the survey from 05/18/26 through 05/21/26 revealed no DON and no ADON present at the facility. Review of the DON personnel file revealed she was hired as the previous ADON on 04/16/26. Further review revealed that on 05/03/26 she was transferred to the DON position.Interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fdisputed · IDR2026-05-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public. This had the potential to affect all 93 residents of the facility. The facility census was 93.Findings include:On 05/18/26 at 12:48 P.M., an observation of the Men's Restroom in the main lobby revealed a sign stating the restroom was temporarily out of order. The inside of the restroom revealed a hole in the ceiling over the toilet with honeycomb-like rusted metal exposed. On 05/18/26 at 12:50 P.M., an interview with the Administrator confirmed the restroom off the main lobby was closed because the roof had a leak and was causing the ceiling to fall down. The Administrator could not confirm when the restroom had been closed for public use. She reported it was a process to get the problem corrected and roofers were supposed to start repair of the roof of the entire facility in the coming week. On 05/18/26 at 1:08 P.M., an observation of the solarium of E…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation of dining, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to promote resident dignity and independence while dining, by standing over residents while assisting them to eat and not assisting the resident into a position to be able to feed themselves. This affected four residents (#24, #87,#92, and #65) of eleven residents observed for dining needs. The facility census was 93. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #24, revealed an admission date of 04/11/23. Diagnoses included but were not limited to Alzheimer's Disease, dementia, gastroesophageal reflux, major depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, type two diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, and anxiety disorder.Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment for Resident #24, dated 03/19/26, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of two on a 0-15 scale. A BIMS score of 0 to 7 points suggests severe cognitive impairment.The MDS indicated the resident required substantial/maximum assistance with eating, was dependent for toileting and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited beforedisputed · IDR2026-05-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior and to maintain a temperature between 71 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and 81 degrees F in the shower room of the E-Wing, which was the facility memory care unit. This affected all 26 of 26 residents residing on the facility's E-Wing. The facility census was 93. Findings include:On 05/18/26 at 1:08 P.M., an observation of the shower room of the E-Wing revealed a wall mounted shower with a handheld shower head which could not be shut off. Hot water was continually running. There was no thermometer in the room, however the room was very warm. The shower contained a wall-mounted shower, which had light green corrosion surrounding the bottom and had a built-in soap tray which was covered in the light green corrosion which would come off to touch. The heater and the floor drain of the shower were both rusted. The shower room was attached, without any doors, to the dirty laundry and trash room, and the odor of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review, resident observations, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to assist residents who were dependent on staff for their needs including timely incontinence care, getting up for meals timely, and bathing/showering as scheduled. This affected three residents (#109, #114, and #184) of three residents reviewed for provision of care. The facility identified 56 residents as needing assistance with incontinence care, bathing/showering, and required use of a mechanical lift to set up in chair for meals. The facility census was 93.Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #109 revealed admission to facility on 08/31/92 with most recent reentry on 08/29/13. The resident had diagnoses including stroke with hemiplegia, aphonia (difficulty speaking), heart failure, chronic lung disease, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), major depression, bilateral retinopathy (affects vision to both eyes).Further review of the medical record for Resident #109…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the medical record and facility policy, observations, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate hand hygiene to stop the spread of infection. This affected one resident (#113) of two residents observed for incontinence care. The facility census was 93.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #113 revealed admission to facility on 05/30/24 for diagnoses including stroke, diabetes, dysarthria (difficulty finding words), anxiety, depression, impaired left eye, left side weakness from stroke, and high blood pressure.Further review of the medical record for Resident #113 revealed an annual comprehensive minimum data set (MDS) 3.0 was completed on 05/14/26. The MDS revealed Resident #113 required a two person transfer with a mechanical lift. Resident #113 was noted to be incontinent of urine and bowel and had a BIMS score of 11/15, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Observation on 05/21/26 at 12:40 P.M. of incontinence care provided to Resident #113 revealed certified nurse aides (CNA) #186 and CNA #192 gathered supplies…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-10 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of Quality Assurance (QA) committee meeting attendance sheets, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a QA meeting was held the first quarter of 2024. This had the potential to affect all 89 residents. Findings include: Upon entrance with the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON), sign in sheets for quality assurance meetings held in the year 2024 were requested. There were no attendance sheets provided for a meeting in the first quarter of 2024. Review of the Quality Assessment and Assurance policy (dated September 2021) revealed the committee shall meet at least quarterly to identify quality assessment and assurance issues, and to develop and implement or oversee implementation of, appropriate plans for identified quality deficiencies. On 02/10/25 at 2:40 P.M., the DON verified there was no documentation/attendance sheets which revealed a QA meeting was held the first quarter of 2024. On 02/10/25 at 3:13 P.M., the Administrator verified she had no evidence a QA meeting was held the first quarter of 2024. The records before she was employed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, interviews, facility policy review, and review of Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Guidelines, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive infection control program was maintained to ensure the health and safety of all residents in the facility including timely notification of the local health department (LHD) regarding positive cases of Coronavirus (COVID-19), failed to have a procedure in place to address staff illness, failed to ensure a comprehensive water maintenance program was continuously implemented, failed to clean the rubber stopper of a multi-use insulin pen and failed to track and trend potential outbreak illness in the facility. This affected Resident #23, #35, #69, #71, #73, #186, #187 and #235 but had the potential to affect all 89 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #235 revealed an admission date of 01/26/25 with diagnoses including type II diabetes, end stage renal disease, cellulitis of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the E wing (memory care unit) was homelike by having a basin on the hallway floor outside of Resident #55's room to collect water from a ceiling leak for an extended period of time and by having walls in disrepair in 9 resident's (#24, #35, #54, #62, #63, #76, #78, #335, and #336) rooms. This affected 10 residents (#24, #35, #54, #55, #62, #63, #76, #78, #335, and #336) out of 26 residents who resided on the E wing (memory care unit). Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #55 revealed an admission date of 06/15/23. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), unspecified dementia, malignant neoplasm of bladder (bladder cancer), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with lower urinary tract symptoms (enlarged prostate), and major depressive disorder. The resident was at moderate risk of falling. Review of Resident #55's quarterly Material Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was severely impaired cognitively;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-10 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of employee files and staff interviews, the facility failed to consistently complete staff evaluations for two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA). This was identified in two personnel files (CNA #367 and #370) out of five employee files reviewed and had the potential to affect all residents except the 26 residents (#12, #17, #18, #20, #24, #29, #30, #35, #42, #45, #48, #49, #53, #54, #55, #59, #61, #62, #63, #66 #76, #78, #79, #335, #336, #337) on the E wing where CNA #367 and #370 had not worked. Findings include: 1. An interview on 02/05/25 at 11:48 A.M. with CNA #367 revealed she was not receiving evaluations on a consistent basis. Review of CNA #367's employee file revealed a hire date of 11/09/22. There was no 90 day or yearly evaluation for 2023. There was a yearly evaluation dated 11/14/24. Interview on 02/10/25 at 9:05 A.M. and again at 10:42 A.M. with Human Resources (HR) /Personnel Manager #316 confirmed the only evaluation in Resident #367's employee file was dated 11/14/24, and she should have had a 90 day and a yearly evaluation in 2023. HR/Personnel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 41 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-10 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the closed medical record, review of facility investigation, interview and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #82 was free from physical restraints. This affected one resident ( Resident #82) of three reviewed for accidents. Findings included: Review of the closed medical record revealed Resident #82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, respiratory failure, iron deficiency anemia, kidney disease, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, diabetes, pulmonary edema, diabetic neuropathy, hypertension, glaucoma, hyperlipidemia, insomnia, and anxiety disorder. Review of the plan of care dated 11/21/24 with a revision dated of 02/06/25 revealed Resident #82 was at risk for falls related to incontinence, decreased strength and endurance, history of falls, need for activity of daily living assistance, poor balance, and unsteady gait. Interventions included bed alarm, bariatric bed, clear pathways, educate resident and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of a Self Reported Incident (SRI) with the facility's investigation, policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure protection of a resident during an investigation of emotional/verbal abuse and the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed into allegations of verbal/emotional abuse. This affected one (Resident #188) of two residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Review of Resident #188's closed medical record revealed diagnoses including systemic lupus erythematosus (lupus that affects multiple organs and systems), osteomyelitis (infection of the bone) of the left ankle and foot, right sided weakness following a stroke, stage four kidney disease and heart disease. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #188 was able to make himself understood, was able to understand others, was cognitively intact, and exhibited no behavioral symptoms. A nursing note dated 09/25/24 at 4:50 A.M. indicated a phlebotomist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-10 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record and interview with the staff the facility failed to ensure a Significant Change assessment was completed for Resident #2 after initiating hospice services. This affected one resident (Resident #2) of 26 residents reviewed for comprehensive assessments. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, protein-calorie malnutrition, history of falling, kidney disease, vitamin D deficiency, hypothyroidism, hypertension, atherosclerotic heart disease, hyperlipidemia, osteoarthritis, hypotension, depression, anxiety disorder, heart failure, anemia, and edema. Review of the February 2025 physician's orders revealed Resident #2 had an order for hospice dated 01/12/25. Further review of the medical record revealed there was no evidence of a Significant Change Minimum Data Set assessment completed within 14-days of receiving hospice services for Resident #2. On 02/10/25 at 10:08 A.M. an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record and interview with the staff the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive assessment accurately reflected a pressure ulcer for Resident #82 and correct hearing status and anti-anxiety medication use for Resident #44. This affected two residents ( Resident #44 and #82) of 26 residents reviewed for comprehensive assessments. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, respiratory failure, iron deficiency anemia, kidney disease, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, diabetes, pulmonary edema, diabetic neuropathy, hypertension, glaucoma, hyperlipidemia, insomnia, and anxiety disorder. Review of the wound evaluation note dated 11/21/24 at 2:14 P.M. revealed Resident # 82 was admitted with a Stage III pressure ulcer to the sacrum. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #82 did not have a pressure ulcer. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to include hearing loss and monitoring the correct dialysis access for Resident #44, constipation and diarrhea for Resident #71, and oxygen use for Resident #67. This affected three residents (#44, #67, and #71) of 26 resident records reviewed. The facility census was 89. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #67 revealed an admission date of 05/24/24 with diagnoses including pulmonary embolism, heart failure, hypertension, and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the physician's orders for February 2025 identified no orders for oxygen use or maintenance of oxygen equipment. Review of Resident #67's care plan, last reviewed 12/10/24, revealed there was no plan of care for oxygen use. On 02/03/25 at 11:04 A.M., observation of Resident #67 revealed he was receiving oxygen via nasal cannula. On 02/03/25 at 11:06 A.M., interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #384 confirmed Resident #67 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #55's doorway was free from potential fall hazards. This affected one (#55) resident of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #55 revealed an admission date of 06/15/23. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), unspecified dementia, malignant neoplasm of bladder (bladder cancer), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with lower urinary tract symptoms (enlarged prostate), and major depressive disorder. The resident was at moderate risk of falling. Review of Resident #55's quarterly Material Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was severely impaired cognitively; exhibited inattention behavior, which was continuously present and did not fluctuate; rejected care daily; used a walker and could walk up to 150 feet with supervision or touch assistance from staff; and had no falls since prior assessment. Further review of Resident #55's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, record review, manufacturer's instructions, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #42 received nectar thick liquids as ordered. This affected one resident (#42); however, it had the potential to affect seven residents (#1, #30, #35, #42, #43, #50, #63) the facility identified as being on a thickened liquids. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of medical chart for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 07/26/23. Diagnoses included altered mental status, oropharyngeal dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), dementia, schizophrenia (a mental health condition which may result in a mix of hallucinations, delusions, disorganized thinking and behavior), and legal blindness. Review of speech therapy evaluation and plan of treatment for Resident #42, signed 05/15/24, revealed the resident had been referred to speech therapy due to coughing/choking during oral intake, pneumonia, prolonged mastication with solids, and signs/symptoms of dysphagia. Clinical bedside assessment of swallowing revealed Resident #42…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #67 had physician's orders for oxygen use, oxygen tubing was dated at the time it was changed, and administration of oxygen was documented in the medical record at the time of each administration and Resident #2's oxygen cannula was stored properly. This affected two residents (#2 and #67) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 89. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #67 revealed an admission date of 05/24/24 with diagnoses including pulmonary embolism, heart failure, hypertension, and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident #67's care plan, last reviewed 12/10/24, revealed there was no plan of care for oxygen use. Review of the physician's orders for February 2025 identified no orders for oxygen use or maintenance of oxygen equipment. Review of the medication administration record, vital signs, assessments, and progress notes for February 2025 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, review of the facility's dialysis contract, and interview, the facility failed to monitor vital signs and weights before and after dialysis for Residents #52 and #239, and failed to maintain adequate communication with the outside dialysis center for Resident #239. This affected two residents (#52 and #239) of three reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 89. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #52 revealed an admission date of 01/17/24 with diagnoses including end-stage renal disease, type two diabetes mellitus, dependence on renal dialysis, and heart failure. Review of the physician's orders for February 2025 identified orders for hemodialysis three times weekly on Monday, Wednesday and Friday at the in-facility dialysis center. Review of the dialysis communication reports for Resident #52 revealed pre-dialysis vital signs were not documented on 03/20/24, there was no dialysis communication form for 04/08/24, post-dialysis vital signs were not documented on 04/19/24, pre-dialysis weight and post-dialysis weight were not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure narcotic pain medications were provided according to physician orders and non-pharmacologic pain relief interventions were encouraged prior to medication administration. This affected one resident (#14) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 10/27/20. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease (ESRD) with dependence on dialysis, muscle weakness, spondylolisthesis of thoracolumbar region( a condition where a vertebra slips out of alignment and presses on the vertebra below it which can put pressure on nerves around spine and cause back pain), osteoarthritis (a condition where the protective cartilage that cushions the end of bone wears down over time which can cause pain) of right knee, hydronephrosis with renal and ureteral calculous obstruction ( a condition where urine builds up in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of the medical record and interview with staff the facility failed to ensure multi-dose insulin pens were dated as to when they were first accessed. This affected three residents (Resident #11,#25 and #242) of 24 residents prescribed insulin. Findings included: 1. Observation of medication administration with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #385 on 02/05/25 at 7:45 A.M. revealed a humulin 70/30 multi-dose Kwikpen for Resident # 242 and a Lantus multi-dose SoloStat pen for Resident #25 that were not dated as to when they were first accessed. On 02/05/25 at 7:50 A.M. an interview with LPN #385 verified the multi-dose insulin pens were not dated as to when the insulin were first accessed. 2. Observations of medication administration with LPN #384 on 02/05/25 at 8:05 A.M. revealed a Novolin 70/30 multi-dose FlexPen for Resident #11 was not dated as to when it was first accessed. On 02/05/25 at 8:15 A.M. an interview with LPN #384 verified there was no dated as to when the multi-dose insulin pen was first accessed. Review of the undated facility policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-10 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a physician order was written prior to obtaining a laboratory test. This affected one (Resident #71) of five residents reviewed for medication use. Findings include: Review of Resident #71's medical record revealed diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus and stroke. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #71 was usually able to understand others and was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #71's physician orders revealed medication orders for the management of the diabetes mellitus. On 09/28/24 an order was written for metformin Extended Release 1000 milligrams (mg) twice a day. An order dated 12/18/24 was written for insulin NPH isophane and regular suspension pen 70/30 with a concentration of 100 units per milliliter. Ten units were ordered every day. A pharmacy recommendation dated 07/26/24 revealed a request for monitoring HgbA1c (laboratory test that measured the average amount of sugar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. On 02/03/25 at 1:49 P.M., Resident #71 reported she had problems with constipation and sometimes went four to six days before she was able to have a bowel movement . Resident #71 stated this was not a new problem. While at home she used a little round pill. Review of Resident #71's medical record revealed diagnoses including cerebral infarction, type two diabetes mellitus, depression, migraine, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism, anxiety disorder, delusional disorder, osteoporosis, and constipation. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #71 was cognitively intact and able to make herself understood. During review of bowel movement records from 01/07/25 to 02/05/25 with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 02/10/25 at 10:09 A.M., the DON verified although there were periods of time greater than three days (01/08/25-01/12/25) when there was no evidence of Resident #71 having a bowel movement, the records were incomplete as there was one shift on 01/08/25, 01/10/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, self-reported incident (SRI) review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were not misappropriated. This finding affected two (Residents #20 and #28) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic pulmonary edema, disorganized schizophrenia and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia. Review of Resident #20's physician orders revealed an order dated 02/20/24 for oxycodone oral tablet (narcotic) 5 milligrams (mg) give one tablet by mouth every six hours as needed for pain. Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, diabetes and chronic gout. Review of Resident #28's physician orders revealed an order dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility investigation review the facility failed to prevent Resident #18 from exiting the facility unsupervised. This affected one resident (Resident #18) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 102. Finding include: Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date on 12/05/23. Diagnoses included dementia severe with other behavioral disturbance, Alzheimer's Disease, anxiety disorder, and a need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #18's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 12/11/23, revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment, did not have any behaviors and had no impairments to his upper and lower extremities. The assessment indicated the resident was independently able to sit, stand, and use the restroom. The resident required supervision or touch assistance for walking 10 feet in a room, corridor, or smaller…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on review of the facility fall log, resident medical record and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #98's physician and family were timely notified of a change in resident condition including falls and hospital transfer. This affected one resident (#98) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 98. Findings include: Review of the facility fall and accident log for the last 30 days (11/12/23- 12/12/23) revealed Resident #98 had four falls on 11/29/23. Review of Resident #98's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 02/18/19 with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and hypertension. Resident #98 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and did not return to the facility. Review of the resident's nursing progress notes revealed the first nursing progress note completed on 11/29/23 was an entry dated 11/29/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on review of facility fall log, review of resident photographs, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to implement comprehensive, individualized and effective interventions to decrease the risk of falls for Resident #98. This affected one resident (#98) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 98. Findings include: Review of Resident #98's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 02/18/19 with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and hypertension. The resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and did not return to the facility. Review of Resident #98's care plan dated 09/29/22 revealed the resident was at risk for falls related to decreased strength and endurance and history falls. Fall prevention interventions included walker within reach, call light within reach, keep bed in lowest position,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-13 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessments were completed accurately. This affected five residents (Residents #10, #29, #34, #40, and #61) of six residents reviewed for pain and anxiety medication usage. The facility census was 102. Findings Include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of acute respiratory failure, cardiogenic shock, diabetes, heart disease, and partial paralysis of the left side after a stroke. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #10 revealed an order dated 08/31/23 for Oxycodone (a narcotic pan medication) 5 milligrams (mg) every eight hours as needed for pain. Attempt and document non-pharmacological interventions dated 08/31/23. Review of the comprehensive 5-day MDS assessment for Resident #10, dated 09/08/23, section J Health Conditions revealed the pain assessment section was not completed. Interview with the Director of Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and staff education, the facility failed to document why as needed pain medications were being administered and what non-pharmacological interventions were attempted prior to administering pain medication. This affected six residents (Residents #10, #29, #45, #61, #65 and #97) of six residents reviewed for pain medication documentation. The facility census was 102. Findings Include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of acute respiratory failure, cardiogenic shock, diabetes, heart disease, and partial paralysis of the left side after a stroke. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #10 revealed an order dated 08/31/23 for Oxycodone (a narcotic pan medication) 5 milligrams (mg) every eight hours as needed for pain and to attempt and document non-pharmacological interventions. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #10 for August and September 2023 revealed the prompts for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, and pharmacy dispensing records the facility failed to implement a gradual dose reduction for psychotropic anxiety medication as ordered. This affected one resident (Resident #84) of six residents reviewed for controlled substance usage. The facility census was 102. Findings Include: Medical review revealed Resident #84 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, dementia without behavioral disturbance, arthritis, autistic disorder, bipolar disorder, anxiety, and glaucoma. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #84 revealed an order dated 08/09/21 for Ativan (a psychotropic anti-anxiety medication) 0.5 milligrams (mg) orally every evening at bedtime. On 08/07/23 an order was written to decrease the dosage to 0.25 mg every evening at bedtime. Review of the August 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #84 revealed the Ativan 0.25 mg dosage was administered at bedtime from 08/07/23 through the end of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were in place as ordered for Resident #12. This affected one resident (#12) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 07/03/23. Diagnoses included right side paralysis, hypertension, dementia, depression and anxiety. Review of the plan of care dated 07/03/23 revealed Resident #12 was at risk for falls due to a history of falls at home and cognitive impairment. Interventions included ensuring the call light was in reach, mats to the floor on both sides of the bed and ensuring needed items were within reach. Review of the fall risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 was at high risk for falls. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #12 required limited assistance from one person for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-10-06 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespreadDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of personnel files, the facility failed to ensure employees did not have a finding entered into the State of Ohio Nurse Aide Registry. This had the potential to affect all 93 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of personnel files revealed Licensed Social Worker #116 hired on 08/03/22, Business Office Manager #176 hired on 06/02/22, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #183 hired on 04/03/17, LPN #186 hired on 05/20/22, Housekeeper (HSK) #137 hired on 06/10/22, HSK #169 hired on 08/26/20 and Registered Nurse #112 hired on 01/10/17 lacked evidence they were checked through the State of Ohio Nurse Aide Registry to determine if they had a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of residents or their property. Interview with Human Resource/Personnel Manager #192 on 10/06/22 at 11:30 A.M. verified there was no evidence in the personnel file provided but indicated the administrator handled that portion. The records were requested. On 10/06/22 at 3:52 P.M. the facility provided evidence they used a computer system that searched…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-06 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record and activity calendar review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activities program for the residents on the secured dementia unit to improve boredom, loneliness and frustration that could result in distress or agitation. This affected three of three residents (#8, #63, and #73) reviewed for activities with the potential to affect all 23 residents on the secured dementia unit in a facility of 93 residents. Findings include: Observations on the secured dementia unit on 10/03/22 at 9:50 A.M. revealed eight residents asleep in the dining room. At 10:23 A.M. the same eight residents were in the dining room with nothing going on. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #153 and State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #146 reported activity staff did not come onto the unit a lot. Meal service began at 11:21 A.M. and continued through 12:35 P.M. Activity Aide (AA) #167 arrived on the unit with a beach ball at 12:28 P.M. but residents were in the middle of meal service, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-06 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — patternEnsure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, review of activity calendars, review of staffing patterns and review of the facility assessment, the facility failed to have sufficient quantity of staff to provide the necessary behavioral health, psychosocial and dementia care to residents with consideration of the number, acuity, and diagnoses of the residents. This affected all 23 residents (#7, #8, #14, #26, #30, #34, #40, #41, #44, #48, #55, #59, #61, #62, #63, #68, #69, #70, #73, #74, #75, #130, and #131) on the secured dementia unit out of 93 residents. Findings include: Observations on the secured dementia unit on 10/03/22 at 9:50 A.M. revealed eight residents asleep in the dining room. The remainder of the residents were in their rooms for the entire day. The posted activities were not being delivered. There was one Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #153 and one State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #146 for 23 residents. LPN #153 and STNA #146 were observed physically running to respond to alarms sounding and call lights. Interview with LPN #153 and STNA #146 on 10/03/22 at 10:30 A.M. reported it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, interview, and review of product information, the facility failed to properly disinfect equipment being removed from a resident's room who had a diagnosis of clostridium difficile. This had the potential to affect eight residents (#18, #19, #28, #80, #184, #186, #230, and #280) of 93 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed she was in isolation for clostridium difficile. On 10/03/22 at 11:02 A.M. two staff were observed donning personal protective equipment and entering Resident #35's room. At 11:04 A.M., an unidentified staff member pushed a mechanical lift into the hallway and wiped it down with a ReadyKleen wipe. At 11:05 A.M. State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #172 exited the room pushing a reclining dialysis chair into the hall. After changing her mask and performing hand hygiene, STNA #172 returned and stated she had to disinfect the chair using ReadyKleen wipes. Review of the label for the ReadyKleen wipes did not indicate it was effective against clostridium difficile. Interview on 10/03/22 at 3:02…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility self reported incident review, resident interview, medical record review and staff interview. The facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect by staff members. This affected three (Residents #50, #52 and #230) of three residents reviewed for staff treatment. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of facility self reported incident (SRI) #227326 created and reported on 09/27/22 indicated State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #104 had reported to administrative staff, STNA #214 was rude and inappropriate with Resident #230. STNA #104 indicated STNA #214 was rude and inappropriate towards Resident #230 by telling the resident she would not respond to verbal calls for assistance, and she would only respond to call light use. Further review of the SRI revealed facility staff interviewed Resident #230 and other residents in the facility which found Residents #50 and #52 also had concerns related to rude and inappropriate treatment by STNA #214. Interview with Resident #230 on 10/04/22 at 12:55 P.M. indicated a staff member was very…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-06 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, electronic narcotic dispense records, policy review, schedule review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure narcotic medications were dispensed appropriately and not misappropriated by staff members. This affected two (Residents #15 and #31) of six residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 93. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/24/20 with admission diagnoses that included cerebrovascular accident with hemiplegia and hemiparesis, congestive heart failure and osteoarthritis. Review of physician's orders indicated the use of oxycodone/acetaminophen (narcotic analgesic pain medication) 5/325 milligrams (mg) every six hours as needed. Review of the electronic narcotic dispense records revealed on 09/06/22 at 5:38 P.M. and 09/24/22 at 3:54 P.M. the Director of Nursing withdrew the above narcotic medications from the Alixa electronic medication dispensing machine (electronic machine which stores narcotics and other medications for staff retrieval and disbursement to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-06 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and resident's representative in writing of the reason for transfer/discharge to the hospital and send a copy of the notice to the Long-Term Care Ombudsman. This affected one of two residents (#81) reviewed for hospitalization. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including respiratory failure. Review of the progress note dated 08/02/22 at 4:08 A. M, revealed Resident #81 had a sudden change in condition and was sent to the hospital for hypoxia, sepsis and hypothermia. On 08/10/22 at 7:00 A. M. he again had a change in condition and was sent to the hospital. There was no evidence in the record the resident/representative were notified of the transfer and the reason for the move in writing nor a copy of the notice sent to the Long-Term Care Ombudsman. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 10/05/22 at 1:45 P.M. indicated the facility had changes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-06 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or the resident's representative of the facility policy for bed hold, including reserve bed payment. This affected two residents reviewed for hospitalization (#35 and #81) of 93 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including respiratory failure. Review of the progress note dated 08/22/22 at 4:08 P.M. indicated Resident #81 had a sudden change in condition and was sent to the hospital where he was diagnosed with hypoxia, sepsis and hypothermia. He was sent to the hospital again on 08/10/22 at 7:00 A.M. for a change in condition for respiratory issues. There was no evidence the resident/representative were notified of bed hold days remaining. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 10/05/22 at 1:45 P.M. indicated between staffing changes with the business office and social services, bed hold notes were never sent.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-06 · tag F0646 — isolatedNotify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure pre-admission screening and resident review was resubmitted after a significant change with new updated mental illness diagnosis. This affected two (Resident #31 and #64) of two residents reviewed for pre-admission screening and resident review. The facility census was 93. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #31's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/19/18 with admission diagnosis that included multiple sclerosis. Review of the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) revealed PASRR completed on 07/16/18 which indicated no evidence of serious mental illness. Further review of the medical record revealed on 12/08/21 a new diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder was added by the physician. Interview with Licensed Social Worker (LSW) #116 on 10/05/22 at 9:50 A.M. verified a PASRR was not resubmitted for review after a new serious mental illness diagnosis was added for Resident #31. 2. Review of the medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, observation, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents dependent upon staff assistance with meals were provided assistance as indicated. This affected one (Resident #31) of three residents reviewed for assistance. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Interview with Resident #31 on 10/03/22 at 9:30 A.M. revealed staff members did not assist him with meals. Observation of Resident #31 for the lunch meals on 10/03/22, 10/04/22 and 10/05/22 revealed no evidence of staff assistance with meals. Resident #31 was independently feeding himself while having significant hand and arm tremors resulting in difficulty eating and a large amount of food debris on the chest of the resident. Review of Resident #31's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/19/18 with admission diagnosis that included multiple sclerosis. Further review of the medical record including the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment with a reference date of 08/16/22 indicated Resident #31 had an independent cognition level and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to reassess and implement interventions for Resident #8's nutritional status following an identification of poor intake resulting in a significant weight loss. This affected one resident (#8) out of three residents (#40 and #284) reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including respiratory failure, diabetes with neuropathy, hypothyroidism, dementia, reflux, major depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, pneumonia, sepsis, esophagitis, esophageal obstruction and schizophrenia. Review of the admission comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #8 was severely cognitively impaired and required the extensive assistance of one person for eating. Review of Resident #8's plan of care related to altered nutrition indicated to monitor/report swallowing issues, monitor meal intake percentages, periodically obtain weight, and provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review, review of pharmacy delivery records, and interview, the facility failed to ensure ordered medications were available for administration. This affected one (Resident #181) of five residents reviewed for medication use and one additional resident (Resident #185) who addressed a concern during initial review. Findings include: 1. On 10/03/22 at 11:20 A.M., Resident #185 stated she was concerned she had not received her thyroid medication for three days. Review of Resident #185's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/18/22. Diagnoses included hypothyroidism. Review of the September 2022 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed an order for [NAME] thyroid tablet 90 milligrams (mg) to be administered once every other day starting 09/20/22 and an order for [NAME] thyroid 60 mg to be administered once every other day starting 09/21/22. Review of a pharmacy packing slip dated 09/18/22 revealed four of each of the [NAME] thyroid doses were delivered to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review, manufacturer guidelines review, and interview, the facility failed to properly sanitize a glucometer. This had the potential to affect five of five residents (Residents #42, #51, #72, #73, #79) who were ordered glucometer testing on the East Hallway of the facility. Facility census was 84. Findings include: Observation on 10/02/19 at 11:11 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #11 performing an ordered, routine blood glucose test for Resident #42 on the East hall. Following the procedure, LPN #11 returned to the medication cart and removed a Sani-Cloth bleach wipe from a container and began wiping the glucometer for approximately 30 seconds. She then placed the glucometer in the top drawer of the medication cart. During interview at this time, LPN #11 revealed she usually wiped the entire glucometer for 30 seconds to one minute, however, she was not sure of the specific contact time required by the Sani-Cloth manufacturer for proper sanitization. Review of the manufacturer guidelines for the Sani-Cloth bleach wipes revealed the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-03 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to timely implement the restorative nursing programs (RNP) for Resident #81. This affected one of two residents reviewed for RNP. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral infarct and muscle weakness. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident needed extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADL). Review of the physical therapy and occupational discharge summaries revealed the resident was discharged from skilled therapy on 09/12/19 and was to receive a RNP to maintain and/or improve her ADL. Review of the restorative rehabilitation program recommendation revealed it was not signed as completed until 09/23/19 and indicated the program start date was 09/25/19 for transfers and range of motion. The recommendation was signed by Physical therapy assistant (PTA) #12. On 10/03/19 at 7:40 A.M., interview with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, family interview, facility policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to timely identify, assess and document resident wounds. This affected two (Resident #77 and #63) of three residents reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions. The facility also failed to provide appropriate care and services for constipation for one (Resident #24) of five residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. Observation of Resident #77 on 09/30/19 at 3:24 P.M. revealed a scabbed area to the right shin below the knee. The wound appeared nearly a week old. Resident #77 was also observed attempting to remove a bandage and wrap that had been applied to the wound. Interview with Resident #77's husband at the time of observation revealed the wound had been present for about a week. Review of Resident #77's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/26/19 with diagnoses that included fracture of the right humerus and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a fall intervention was in place for Resident #12. This affected one (Resident #12) of three residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dizziness, and history of falls. Review of the resident's Fall Risk Assessment, dated 08/20/19, revealed the resident was at a risk for falls, indicated by a score of 20. Review of Resident #12's Care Plan revealed fall interventions, initiated on 05/23/19, for non-skid footwear and to follow the facility fall protocol. Review of Resident #12's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Assessment, dated 08/14/19, revealed the resident required extensive, one-person assistance for transfers in her room. Review of Resident #12's nursing progress note, dated 09/18/19 at 6:11 A.M., revealed the resident was found lying on the floor, on her left side, during morning rounds.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive and individualized bladder program was in place to ensure Resident #81 remained as continent as possible. This affected one of one resident reviewed for bladder incontinence. This facility identified 36 residents on the restorative scheduled toileting program. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included overactive bladder, urinary incontinence and difficulty walking. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact but needed extensive assistance of at least two staff for transfers and toileting and one staff for hygiene. The resident was not steady moving on or off the toilet but was stabilized with staff assistance. The resident used a walker or a wheelchair for mobility. The resident was on a toileting program but was frequently incontinent of bladder. Review of the current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-03 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the antibiotic stewardship program was implemented for Resident #81, who received an antibiotic (ATB) for an urinary tract infection (UTI) that did not meet the McGreer criteria the facility used for ATB stewardship. This affected one of one resident reviewed for ATB use. The facility had five residents receiving antibiotics. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included urinary incontinence and history of UTI's. The resident was re-admitted from the hospital on [DATE] on antibiotics for a UTI. Review of the resident's current care plans revealed no care plan for recurrent UTI's. Review of the nursing notes dated 09/15/19 through 09/18/19 revealed there were no signs or symptoms to suggest the resident may have had a UTI requiring antibiotics. Review of the urinalysis dated 09/18/19 revealed the resident had bacteria in her urine which was sensitive to Ciprofloxacin.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-02-10 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review and interview, the facility failed to establish comprehensive written policies and procedures related to the Quality Assurance (QA) process. This had the potential to affect all 89 residents. Findings include: Review of the Quality Assessment and Assurance policy (dated September 2021) revealed the committee would consist of the Administrator, the Director of Nursing Services, a physician designated by the facility and other facility staff members. The committee shall be responsible for identifying issues needing action that affect quality of care and services provided to residents. The committee shall meet at least quarterly to identify quality assessment and assurance issues, and to develop and implement or oversee implementation of, appropriate plans for identified quality deficiencies. The facility would expand and develop the Quality Assurance (QA) Committee to meet the requirement of the Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement Committee. Issues of quality concerns that rise to a level that demonstrated a lapse in the facility standards or has the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of the facility bed hold notices and interview with staff the facility failed to ensure bedhold notices were given to Resident #52 and #82 before a hospital transfer. This affected two residents ( Resident #52 and #82) of three reviewed for hospitalization. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, respiratory failure, iron deficiency anemia, kidney disease, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, diabetes, pulmonary edema, diabetic neuropathy, hypertension, glaucoma, hyperlipidemia, insomnia, and anxiety disorder. Further review of the medical record revealed Resident #82 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE], 01/06/25, 01/18/25, and 01/31/25 with no evidence of a bedhold notice was given to the resident or his legal representative. On 02/06/25 at 2:20 P.M. an interview with Business Office Manager #387 revealed Resident #82 was never given a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$28,763 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $28,763 — penalty dated 2023-12-20
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALLEGIANCE HEALTHCARE HOLDCO LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/01/2024 |
| FEJCC TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/01/2022 |
| MDATAS TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/01/2022 |
| MRS FAMILY TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/01/2022 |
| CAPITAL FINANCE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/01/2024 |
| FINKELSTEIN, ELIEZER | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2022 |
| HOCHSTADTER, NATAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2022 |
| PROGRESSIVE QUALITY CARE INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 04/01/2002 |
| DEWALD, SHILO | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| RAWAL, ISH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| DAUBENMIRE, KEVIN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $610K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365604. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.