No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Winchester Terrace

70 Winchester Rd, Mansfield, OH 44907 · For profit - Corporation · 83 certified beds · (419) 756-4747 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (419) 756-4747 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citations (F0567, F0568)2 actual-harm citations1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$14,015 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568)
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $14,015 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-18)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (65%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
475 Lexington Ave · (419) 756-2003 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
283 Cline Ave · (419) 756-6032 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
660 S Diamond St · (419) 522-6331 · Call to confirm hours
Park
111 Gibson Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased0.0%5.3%15.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.9%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms45.7%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.9%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.5%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.3%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.6%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.0%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table0.0%8.8%17.1%check this — see note marked star below the table
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.7%75.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission34.6%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.2%12.9%12.0%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 27 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

54.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.25U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF54.6%CMS range 38.4–71.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.8%CMS range 6.0–13.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.861.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.60
RN hours/ resident / day
0.57
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.58
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.75
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.41
RN hoursweekends
64.6%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 83 beds and averages 51.7 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 31 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.75 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.58 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.45 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.88 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 65% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-07-02)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2023-04-13)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

40 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY.Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of the facility incident and accident log, review of hospital records, review of staff statements, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff operated Hoyer lifts in a safe manner to prevent falls. This resulted in Actual Harm on 08/20/25 at approximately 6:30 A.M. when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #236 and Registered Nurse (RN) #252 transferred Resident #03 out of bed with the use of a Hoyer lift and did not ensure the transfer sling straps were secured. During the transfer, the Hoyer lift became stuck and staff forcefully pulled the Hoyer lift, causing the transfer sling strap to disconnect from the lift and Resident #03 fell to the floor. Resident #03 sustained a laceration above the right eyebrow that required sutures, and a laceration to the right wrist. This affected one (Resident #03) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 46.Findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, Self-Reported Incident (SRI) review, review of hospital records, facility investigation review, personnel file review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #10 was transferred in a safe manner and as per the resident's assessed/planned needs to prevent an avoidable accident resulting in major injury. Actual harm occurred on 09/08/24 when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #400 attempted to transfer Resident #10, who required the use of a mechanical lift for transfers, out of bed without an additional staff assisting and using the resident's walker. This improper transfer resulted in Resident #10 falling backwards onto the bed, striking her right elbow on the metal bed frame causing pain, a decrease in function of the resident's arm, swelling, redness, warmth and scattered bruising. An x-ray of the right elbow was completed on 09/09/24 and revealed a displaced fracture of the distal humerus (the long bone in the upper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2019-12-05 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital documentation, staff and physician interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff thoroughly assessed a resident who was experiencing unrelieved abdominal pain to ensure the resident received timely treatment. This resulted in actual harm for Resident #8 when staff failed to assess and immediately report increased severe abdominal pain to the physician resulting in delayed emergency room treatment for uncontrolled pain and treatment of a perforated gastric ulcer. This affected one (#8) of one resident reviewed for a change in condition. The facility census was 43. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission dated 09/18/14. Diagnoses included osteoarthritis, diabetes mellitus type two, a stage two pressure ulcer of the left buttock, and hypertension. Review of a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 had intact cognition. Review of a nurse's note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure mechanical lifts were operated safely. This affected one (#21) of one resident reviewed for mechanical lift transfers. The facility census was 53. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 10/23/19. Diagnoses included normal pressure hydrocephalus, hemiplegia, and dementia. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/01/25, revealed Resident #21 was cognitively impaired and required total (staff) assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Resident #21 utilized a mechanical lift for transfers. Review of the care plan dated 10/23/19 revealed Resident #21 had an ADL deficit related to dementia and hemiplegia. Interventions included using a mechanical lift with two staff to transfer Resident #21 in and out of bed.Review of the physician orders revealed an order dated 12/20/22 for Hoyer (mechanical) lift for all transfers.Observation on 12/30/25 at 11:39 A.M. revealed Certified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, review of electronic mail (e-mail) correspondence, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a clean, safe and sanitary environment. This had the potential to affect all 46 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 46.Findings include:Observation on 09/17/25 at 3:03 P.M. of the courtyard entrance, located near the front doors, revealed a laminate type flooring that was raised and buckled. The flooring was not secured to the floor and could be lifted off of the floor. Further observation revealed spaces between the flooring slats. Observation on 09/17/25 at 3:10 P.M. of the Malabar Lane Hall revealed large areas of discoloration/stains on the carpeting throughout the hallway. Across from Resident # 33's room was a large tear in the carpet, and the carpet was able to be lifted, exposing the floor underneath.Observation on 09/17/25 at 3:15 P.M. of the Oakhill Hall revealed large areas of discoloration/stains on the carpeting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review the facility failed to maintain infection control measures during incontinence care for a resident. This deficient practice affected one resident (Resident #13) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 46. Findings Include: An observation on 10/20/34 at 11:00 A.M. revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #322 and CNA #209 completing incontinence care for Resident #13. CNA #322 had a basin with warm water sitting on the bedside table with a bottle of personal hygiene soap. CNA #322 placed the used washcloth on the bedside table. CNA used one washcloth to wash Resident #13's front peri-area and groin area, once washing was complete CNA #322 placed the used washcloth on the bedside table without a barrier. CNA #322 then took another wet washcloth and rinsed Resident #13's front peri-area and groin area, once completed CNA #322 placed the used washcloth on the bedside table. CNA #322 took a towel and dried the area, placing the towel on the bed sheet at the foot of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure carpeting was maintained in a clean, sanitary and safe condition. This had the potential to affect all 44 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: 1. Random intermittent observations on 06/30/24 between 8:00 A.M. and 4:00 P.M. revealed large numerous areas of stains on the carpeting through out the facility. Numerous instances of carpet peeling, creating a tripping hazard, were also noted through out the facility. Interview with the Administrator on 07/01/24 at 1:34 P.M. verified the condition of carpeting. The Administrator further stated areas (of the carpeting) were just replaced approximately six months ago. At this point in time, I do not believe it is in the budget to replace. 2. Observation of the dinning room sink on 07/02/24 at 12:00 P.M. revealed significant areas of brown and black discoloration in the sink and around the drain. When wiped with a towel, a thick brown layer of what appeared to be a mixture of brown and black sludge was taken off but the discoloration in the drain and sink…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) contained all the necessary information. This affected two (Residents #6 and #8) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The facility census was 44. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including bronchitis, sepsis, and osteoporosis Review of the SNF ABN provided to Resident #6 on 06/14/24 revealed the resident's skilled therapy services were being discontinued due to the resident reaching maximum benefits from therapy services. The notice contained no specific information as to what therapy services were being discontinued and what specific costs the resident would incur if they desired for therapy services to continue. The cost section of the notice was labeled daily cost. Interviewed with the Administrator on 06/30/24 at 3:06 P.M. verified the SNF…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff, resident and family interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to offer or provide Resident #194, who was dependent on staff for hygiene tasks, assistance with shaving. This affected one (Resident #194) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 44. Findings include: Review of Resident #194's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/26/24. Diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of the pancreatic duct, type II diabetes mellitus, vertigo, and weakness. Review of Resident #194's admission nursing assessment, dated 06/26/24, revealed the resident was identified to be dependent on staff for bathing, dressing, and hygiene tasks. Review of Resident #194's care plan, revised 07/02/24, revealed the resident had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to an acute illness, impaired mobility, weakness, and history of falls. The resident was identified to require assistance with bathing, hygiene, transfers, toileting, ambulating, and dressing. Listed interventions included Resident #194…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff, family, and resident interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a program of activities that met the needs and preferences of the residents. This affected three (Residents #3, #8, and #41) of four residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 44. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed an admission date of [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, and had a fall resulting in a left femur fracture prior to admission to the facility. The record identified Resident #41 had elected to receive hospice services. Review of Resident #41's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 significant change in status assessment, dated [DATE], revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. The resident's activity section revealed the resident was interviewed as to activity preferences, and listed having family members involved in her care as very important, and having books and magazines…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, medical record review, review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance on prevention of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents urinary catheter bags were not resting on the floor. This affected two (Residents #20 and #28) of seven residents with urinary catheters. The facility census was 44. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an admission date of 06/29/23. Diagnoses included personal history of urinary tract infections, hydronephrosis with renal and ureteral calculous obstruction and presence of urogenital implants (suprapubic catheter). Review of Resident #28's care plan, undated, revealed the resident was at risk for complications related to her suprapubic catheter. The resident required the use of a suprapubic catheter related to obstructive and reflux uropathy. Listed interventions included to not allow the urinary drainage bag to lie on the floor. Observation on 06/30/24 at 9:46 A.M. revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-07 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespread
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of maintenance repair logs, review of Resident Council meeting minutes, staff interview, Ombudsman interview, and review of manufacturer instructions, the facility failed to ensure processes were in place to ensure the resident call light system was tested and maintained in a fully functioning manner, and staff had required equipment to be alerted to resident call lights. This had the potential to affect all 44 residents residing in the facility. The census was 44. Findings include: Review of the facility maintenance repair log for the past three months revealed on 11/12/23 both call lights in room [ROOM NUMBER] were broken, the call light was broken in room [ROOM NUMBER], and the call light in room [ROOM NUMBER] would not go off. On 11/15/23 the call light in room [ROOM NUMBER] and in room [ROOM NUMBER], and in room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom were not working. On 01/03/24 the call light was not working in room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], and room [ROOM NUMBER]. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure suprapubic urinary catheter dressing changes were completed as ordered. This affected one (#32) of three residents reviewed for dressing changes. The facility census was 44. Findings include: Review of Resident #32's medical record revealed admission to the facility occurred on 06/29/23. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anxiety, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and obstructive uropathy. Review of Resident #32's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #32 was assessed as cognitively intact and had a suprapubic urinary catheter in place. Review of Resident #32's February 2023 physician orders revealed nursing staff should clean the urinary catheter site and apply a sponge daily. Interview and observation of Resident #32 on 02/07/23 at 9:45 A.M. stated the dressing to her suprapubic urinary catheter was not changed the previous day. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure wallpaper was not peeling and/or carpet was maintained in a clean manner/in good repair throughout the hallways of the facility. This had the potential to affect all 46 residents currently residing in the facility. Facility census was 46. Findings include: An environmental tour was conducted on 12/18/23 between 12:19 P.M. and 12:50 P.M. The tour revealed carpet in the hallways throughout the facility leading to resident rooms and other common resident areas contained multiple dark and light stains on dark blue carpet. There were many areas where the carpet fibers were missing. Interview on 12/18/23 at 12:20 P.M. with Housekeeper #103 revealed the sweeper sucks up a string of carpet and it keeps unraveling and [NAME] on the vacuum spool causing a bare spot revealing the carpet backing. The carpet was also noted in numerous areas to be pulling away from the floor in the center of the hallways that lead to resident rooms presenting a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-13 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility funds management system, and resident, family and staff interviews, the facility failed to obtain written authorization prior to opening resident personal needs accounts. This affected four (#8, #16, #19, and #28) of four resident personal needs accounts reviewed. The facility identified Resident #8, #16, #19, and #28 as the only residents with personal needs accounts. The census was 37. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #8's medical record identified admission to the facility occurred on 06/02/22. Review of Resident #8's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 was assessed with severely impaired cognition. Resident #8's payer source was listed as Medicaid. Review of Resident #8's personal needs account (PNA) revealed a balance on 03/31/23 of $700.15. There was no written authorization provided that indicated Resident #8 or a legal representative authorized for personal funds to be deposited in an account with the facility. 2. Review of Resident #16's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-13 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility funds management system, and resident, family and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide quarterly statements of account activity and failed to maintain resident fund records in a clear and understandable manner. This affected four (#8, #16, #19, and #28) of four resident personal needs accounts reviewed. The facility identified Resident #8, #16, #19, and #28 as the only residents with personal needs accounts. The census was 37. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #8's medical record identified admission to the facility occurred on 06/02/22. Review of Resident #8's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 was assessed with severely impaired cognition. Resident #8's payer source was listed as Medicaid. Review of Resident #8's personal needs account (PNA) revealed Resident #8 had a balance of $700.00 on 01/15/23 and on 03/31/23 was given interest brining the balance to $700.15. Further review of the account document revealed no monthly addition of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on call light audit documentation, medical record review, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure call lights were answered in a timely manner. This affected three (#5, #21, and #35) of five reviewed for call lights. The census was 37. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 02/28/23 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease stage three, diarrhea, anxiety, hypertension, muscle wasting, need for personal assistance, hyperlipidemia, and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #5 dated 03/07/23 revealed Resident #5 was assessed with intact cognition and required extensive assist for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of call light times for Resident #5 revealed a call light time of 250 minutes on 04/09/23 at 2:55 P.M. Interview on 04/13/23 at 9:39 A.M. with Resident #5 stated staff did not answer call lights very quickly and stated he often waits at least 30…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-13 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to bathe residents per their preference. This affected one (#2) of seven residents reviewed for bathing. The census was 37. Findings include: Review of Resident #2's medical record identified admission to the facility occurred on 02/07/23 with medical diagnoses including quadriplegia, high blood pressure, and pressure ulcers. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 was cognitively intact. Review of section F of the MDS identified under the question how important it was for the resident to choose between a tub, shower, or bed bath, Resident #2 rated it was somewhat important on scale of one to five, with one being most important. The assessment further identified Resident #2 was totally dependant on staff for bathing. Review of Resident #2's written plan of care for activities of daily living (ADLs) dated 02/07/23 revealed he was totally dependent on staff for bathing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, hospital discharge record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to confirmed a resident's code status upon admission to ensure accuracy. This affected one (#37) of 16 sampled residents reviewed for code status. The census was 37. Findings include: Review of Resident #37's medical record identified admission to the facility occurred on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including anemia, weakness, dementia, and history of falling. Review of Resident #37's discharge medical records from the hospital dated [DATE] revealed on [DATE] the hospital physician met with Resident #37's sister, and the hospital records revealed Resident #37 signed papers at the hospital to change his code status to Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) which instructed health care providers not to do cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) if a patient's breathing stops or if the patient's heart stops beating. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #37 was assessed with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate finger nail care for dependent residents. This affected two (#21 and #36) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The census was 37. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #21's medical record identified the resident was admitted on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including falls, muscle weakness, high blood pressure, and coronary artery disease (CAD). Review of the admission comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 was assessed with intact cognition and required extensive assistance of one person with personal hygiene. Review of Resident #21's written plan of care identified she was totally or nearly dependent on staff for bathing, hygiene, and dressing. Observation and interview with Resident #21 on 04/10/23 at 10:01 A.M. revealed Resident #21's finger nails were very long and some were jagged. Interview with Resident #21 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-13 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interview, and review of an activity calendar, the facility failed to ensure activities met the needs of the residents. This affected two (#10 and #24) of 13 residents reviewed for activities. The census was 37. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 09/10/21 with diagnoses including rheumatoid arthritis, atrial fibrillation, morbid obesity, nonrheumatic mitral valve insufficiency, major depressive disorder, fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis, unspecified psychosis, anxiety, hypertension, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #10 dated 01/12/23 revealed Resident #10 was assessed with intact cognition and required extensive assist for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the care plan for Resident #10 dated 01/12/23 revealed the resident was very active in activities. Resident enjoyed BINGO, crafting, and cooking activities. Interventions included encourage ongoing family involvement, invite the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide pressure ulcers prevention interventions as indicated. This affected one (#36) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The census was 37. Findings include: Review of Resident #36's medical record identified admission to the facility occurred on 02/25/23 under the care of hospice services for end of life care. Resident #36 had medical diagnoses including dementia, anxiety, restlessness and agitation. Review of Resident #36's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified no skin issues at the time of admission; however, Resident #36 was identified at high risk for pressure ulcer development. Review of Resident #36's plan of care included a pressure reducing mattress. Review of Resident #36's medical record revealed on 03/27/23 Resident #36 was seen by a wound consultant for development of a pressure ulcer to the coccyx. The wound consultant note dated 03/27/23 identified Resident #36's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide nutritional interventions as ordered. This affected one (#92) of two residents reviewed for nutrition. The census was 37. Findings include: Review of Resident #92's medical record identified admission occurred on 03/22/23. Resident #92 was placed on hospice services on 04/07/23 with medical diagnoses including; COVID-19, dementia, pulmonary nodules, and history of colon cancer. Review of Resident #92's nutritional admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #92 had a poor appetite and a physician order was placed to provide yogurt daily at breakfast. Further review revealed Resident #92's family indicated Resident #92 liked yogurt and would usually eat it. Review of Resident #92's admission weight on 03/28/23 revealed Resident #92 weighed 98 pounds. Observation of Resident #92 on 04/11/23 at 9:05 A.M. revealed Resident #92 was assisted with eating by State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #67 with no yogurt present.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. This affected one (#12) of four residents reviewed for medications. The census was 37. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 11/20/12 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, flaccid hemiplegia affecting right dominant side, aphasia, major depressive disorder, hypothyroidism, anxiety, Bell's palsy, and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 was assessed with moderately impaired cognition. Review of a nurses note dated 04/06/23 revealed Resident #12 had new orders for the thyroid hormone levothyroxine (Synthroid) 200 micrograms (mcg), the cholesterol-lowering medication fenofibrate 145 milligrams (mg), and laboratory values on 07/06/23. Review of the April 2023 medication administration record (MAR) for Resident #12 revealed levothyroxine 175 mcg was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-13 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident, family, and staff interviews, and medical record review, the facility failed to timely follow up with dental services after a resident's dentures were lost. This affected one (#21) of seven residents reviewed for dental services. The census was 37. Findings include: Review of Resident #21's medical record identified admission to the facility occurred on 02/13/23 with medical diagnoses including falls, muscle weakness, chronic obstruction pulmonary disease (COPD), and high blood pressure. Review of Resident #21's admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 had upper and lower dentures. Review of Resident #21's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 was cognitively intact, required extensive assistance of one person for personal hygiene, and was assessed with no broken or loosely fitting dentures. The assessment identified Resident #21 would not be able to obtain her dentures without assistance from the staff. Observation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-12-05 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespread
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff, resident and family interviews, review of a resident notice, review of a nursing services sign, review of a letter addressed to the Ohio Department of Health, review of the resident council minutes and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the resident call light system was timely repaired. This had the potential to affect all 43 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 43. Findings include Observation on 12/02/19 beginning at 9:00 A.M. revealed the resident call light system was not functioning. Further observations revealed residents were given a metal call bell to ring when assistance was needed. Continued observations revealed notices Important Notice Call Light System were posted in resident rooms. Review of the undated Important Notice Call Light System, revealed the call light system went down and was beyond repair. Everything was in motion to get the system replaced as quickly as possible. Further review of the notice revealed each resident had a service bell to ring for assistance and to ring the bell multiple times so…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff, resident and family interview, review of the facility activity calendar and policy review, the facility failed to provide a program of activities that met the residents needs and interests. This affected six (#20, #2, #38, #31, #7 and #37) of six residents reviewed for activities. The census was 43. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed he admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, major depressive disorder, and anxiety. Review of Resident #20's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed he had a moderate cognitive impairment and was totally dependent on staff for bathing. The MDS revealed doing his favorite activities was very important. Review of Resident #20's activity care plan, last revised 09/23/19, revealed he had a potential for altered mood/psychosocial deficit related to nursing home placement as well as diagnoses of depression and anxiety. The care plan stated Resident #20's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview with facility staff, and review of a kitchen cleaning calendar, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen food preparation area and five oven its in a sanitary condition. This had the potential to affect all but one resident (#10-cannot consume oral nutrition). The census was 43. Findings include: During an observation on 12/02/19 at 9:15 A.M., the kitchen floor in the food preparation area had a black and sticky residue. The preparation area was several feet long, and its entirety was soiled. Interview on 12/02/19 at 9:15 A.M. with Dietary Aid (DA) #39 confirmed the food preparation area had a black and sticky residue. She stated it had looked like this when she arrived for her shift that morning. She stated staff was supposed to mop the preparation area after dinner and must not have mopped 12/01/19. During an observation on 12/02/19 at 9:17 A.M., five oven mitts were hanging by the oven and microwave and appeared brown and soiled. Some of the fibers of the mitts were matted together. Interview on 12/02/19 at 9:17 A.M. with DA #39 confirmed five…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff and resident interviews and review of the Resident [NAME] of Rights, the facility failed to ensure residents were afforded with their right to dignity. This affected two (#20 and #13) of two residents reviewed for dignity. This had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 43. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed he admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, major depressive disorder, and anxiety. Review of Resident #20's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed he had a moderate cognitive impairment and was totally dependent on staff for bathing and locomotion. The MDS revealed doing his favorite activities was very important. Review of Resident #20's activity care plan, last revised 09/23/19, revealed he had a potential for altered mood/psychosocial deficit related to nursing home placement as well as diagnoses of depression and anxiety. The care plan stated Resident #20's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-05 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to complete Advanced Beneficiary Notices (ABN) as required for two (#33 and #248) of two residents reviewed who remained in the facility after being cut from skilled services and still had remaining Medicare Benefit days available for use. The facility identified two (#33 and #248) who had had remained in the facility after being discharged from skilled care and had remaining Medicare Benefits remaining in the last 180 days. Facility census was 43. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #33's medical record revealed she admitted to the facility 08/03/19. Diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of Resident #33's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed she had a severe cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance from staff for ADL's. Review of a form titled, Beneficiary Notice-Residents discharged Within the Last Six Months, revealed she was discharged from skilled services on 08/30/19.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff, resident and family interview and review of resident council minutes, the facility failed to ensure an adequate supply for towels and washcloths were available for resident use. This affected three (#18, #1 and #37) out of 17 residents sampled during the survey. The facility census was 43. Findings include: Interview on 12/04/19 at 12:10 P.M. with Resident #37's husband stated the facility did not have any clean washcloths or towels last night to provide care for the resident. Observation on 12/04/19 at 2:06 P.M. of the facility's laundry room and linen closets revealed no wash clothes or towels in the two linen closets and currently a load of washcloths and towels in the dryer. Observation on 12/05/19 at 9:28 A.M. of the facility's two linen closets revealed only two towels available for resident use. Interview on 12/04/19 at 1:58 P.M. with State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNA's) #48 and #71 verified they had limited clean laundry this morning to provide care with. Interview on 12/04/19 at 2:06 P.M. with Laundry/Housekeeping Supervisor #38 verified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. This affected two (#2 and #44) of 14 residents reviewed for accurate MDS assessments. The census was 43. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed she admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included major depressive disorder, aphasia following cerebral infarction, and hemiplegia/hemiparesis following cerebral infarction. Review of Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], section B of the MDS, which assessed vision, speech, and hearing, revealed she was sometimes understood and sometimes understands others. Section C of the MDS which assessed cognition stated an interview should not be conducted because resident was rarely/never understood. A staff assessment was completed and revealed Resident #2 had a severe cognitive impairment. She had no behaviors per the MDS. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-05 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to screen two residents for serious mental illness and developmental disability prior to admission. This affected two (#1 and #43) of 14 residents reviewed for appropriate Pre-admission screens. The census was 43. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed she admitted to the facility 08/15/19. Diagnoses included cerebral palsy, major depressive disorder, and schizophrenia. Review of her Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance from staff with activities of daily living. Review of the medical record lacked evidence of a pre-admission screen. During an interview on 12/02/19 at 3:34 P.M., Office Manager (OM) #57 confirmed Resident #1's Pre-admission Screen/Resident Review did not include her schizophrenia nor cerebral palsy, and thus was not properly screened for serious mental illness or developmental disability and should have been as the boards of both…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident, family and staff interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure showers were provided to a resident who required assistance with activities of daily living. This affected one (#43) of two residents reviewed for showers. The facility census was 43. Findings include Review of the medical record revealed Resident #43 had an admission date of 11/08/19. Diagnoses included a malignant neoplasm of the ovary, cerebral infarction, pleural effusion, cachexia, atrial fibrillation, difficulty walking, osteoarthritis and muscle weakness. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #43 had mild cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed Resident #43 was dependent on staff for bathing. Continued review of the MDS assessment revealed it was very important for Resident #43 to choose between tub bath, shower, bed bath or sponge bath. Review of the shower schedule revealed Resident #43's name was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-05 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's hearing aid was maintained. This affected one (#26) of eight residents who wear hearing aids. The facility census was 43. Findings include: Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/28/14. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, trigeminal neuralgia, unspecified hearing loss, glaucoma, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of Resident #26's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. The assessment listed the resident as having moderate difficulty with hearing. Review of Resident #26's care plan revealed a communication deficit related to hearing loss. Interventions included to refer for audiology evaluation as needed. Review of Resident #26's social services note dated 07/24/19 revealed an Audiologist visited to deliver a hearing aid for the resident's right ear. The resident was instructed to wear the hearing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and interview with facility staff, the facility failed to provide preventative pressure ulcer interventions as care planned and physician ordered. This affected one (#2) of two residents reviewed for skin. The facility identified 36 residents receiving preventative skin care. Facility census was 43. Findings include: Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed she admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included major depressive disorder, aphasia following cerebral infarction, and hemiplegia/hemiparesis following cerebral infarction. Review of Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], section B of the MDS, which assessed vision, speech, and hearing, revealed she was sometimes understood and sometimes understands others. Section C of the MDS which assessed cognition stated an interview should not be conducted because resident was rarely/never understood. A staff assessment was completed and revealed Resident #2 had a severe cognitive impairment. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident, family and staff interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to monitor a resident's weights weekly and failed to administer nutritional supplements per physician orders for a resident who was assessed as experiencing a significant weight loss before admission. This affected one (#43) of one resident reviewed for nutrition. The facility identified six residents at high risk for malnutrition and 25 residents receiving nutritional supplements. The facility census was 43. Findings include Review of the medical record revealed Resident #43 had an admission date of 11/08/19. Diagnoses included a malignant neoplasm of the ovary, cerebral infarction, pleural effusion, cachexia, atrial fibrillation, difficulty walking, osteoarthritis and muscle weakness. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #43 had mild cognitive impairment. Review of weight documentation revealed Resident #43 weighed 109 pounds on 11/14/19.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-05 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the 13-valent pneumococcal vaccine (Prevnar-13) was offered to the residents. This affected three (#7, #20, #26) of five residents reviewed for influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations. The facility census was 43. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia and hypertension. Review of immunization documentation revealed no documentation Resident #7 was offered or had received the Prevnar-13 pneumococcal vaccine. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, cerebral infarction and hypertension. Review of immunization documentation revealed no documentation Resident #20 was offered or had received the Prevnar-13 pneumococcal vaccine. 3. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #26 had an admission date of 08/28/19. Diagnoses included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-07-02 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of survey history, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure results of complaint investigations by the state survey agency were available as required. This had the potential to affect all 44 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: An observation on 06/30/24 at 12:08 P.M. of the facility's main lobby area revealed a white binder identifying the state survey results. The most recent report contained in the binder was 04/23/23. Review of the previous survey activity for the facility revealed the Ohio Department of Health conducted complaint investigation surveys on 11/03/23, 12/19/23, 02/07/24, and 04/09/24. The results of these surveys were not present in the survey book at the time of the observation on 06/30/24. An interview conducted on 06/30/24 at 1:10 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified the survey results binder contained only the results of the last annual survey and were missing the four complaint investigation results reports since the last annual survey. The DON confirmed the survey results books should contain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-07-02 · tag F0623 — widespread
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman were notified of the residents transfers to the hospital. This affected 12 (Residents #14, #21, #40, #41, #42, #43, #145, #146, #147, #148, #149, and #195 ) reviewed for hospitalization and transfers and had the potential to affect all 44 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the list of admission transfers and discharges from April 2024 through July 2024 revealed the following: Resident #14 was discharged to an acute care hospital on [DATE]. Resident #21 was discharged to an acute care hospital on [DATE]. Resident #40 was discharged to an acute care hospital on [DATE]. Resident #41 was discharged to an acute care hospital on [DATE]. Resident #42 was discharged to an acute care hospital on [DATE]. Resident #43 was discharged to an acute care hospital on [DATE]. Resident #145 was discharged to an acute care hospital on [DATE].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$14,015 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $14,015 — penalty dated 2025-09-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LEVERING MANAGEMENT, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 03/19/1993
LEVERING, CYNTHIAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF11%since 12/30/2020
LEVERING, KENNETHIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF11%since 01/01/2004
LEVERING, THOMASIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF11%since 12/30/2020
LEVERING, W. JOANIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF46%since 03/19/1993
LEVERING, WILLIAMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF14%since 06/01/2007
SRINGERI, VIJETHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/12/2002
YAKE, DARLENEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/30/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-15.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$512K
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 57%Medicare 4%Other / private 39%

This home reported $512K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$313per resident / day
operating cost
$9,502per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$271per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365911. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-07-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next