Medina Bsd Opco LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 71 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 82.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 46 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 52.1 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.05 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.95 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.36 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.14 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 74% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-05-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, hospital record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure safe, clinically indicated, and competent Foley catheter insertion and follow up monitoring for Resident #64 and failed to follow physician orders for indwelling catheter care for Resident #37. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and serious life-threatening harm, negative health outcomes, and/or death for one resident (#64) when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #800 performed a non ordered Foley catheter change on [DATE] while Resident #64 was visibly moving, resisting, and verbalizing pain, without clinical assessment, supervisory involvement, or medical provider notification. There was no documented evidence of assessment of insertion difficulty, trauma, or need for escalation. Later that evening, the resident developed severe pain (10/10) and hematuria, but staff did not notify the physician or perform further assessment. By 1:00 A.M. on [DATE], Resident #64 was slow to arouse,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2026-05-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, review of manufacturer guidelines, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with physician orders and accepted standards of practice resulting in a significant medication error for Resident #70. Actual Harm occurred on 11/14/25 when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #800 failed to perform the physician ordered pre meal blood glucose check and failed to administer the prescribed Lispro insulin prior to the lunch meal. As a direct result of this deviation from physician orders, facility policy, and manufacturer standards, Resident #70 developed severe hyperglycemia with a critically elevated blood glucose of 384 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL), accompanied by lethargy, hypotension with blood pressure measuring 78/55 millimeters of mercury (mmHG), reduced responsiveness, and clinical decline necessitating transfer to the emergency department for urgent medical evaluation and treatment. This affected one (#70) out of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-02 · tag F0773 — isolated
  Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record and interview with staff, the facility failed to ensure laboratory tests were obtained as ordered for Resident #2. This affected one resident (Resident #2) of three residents who were reviewed for physician orders. Findings Include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, bronchiectasis, gastroparesis, dependent on a respirator, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, obstructive sleep apnea, hypertension, osteomyelitis, Acinetobacter Baumannii, pseudomonas, resistant to antibiotics, anxiety disorder, pressure ulcers, acquired absence of right and left legs above the knee, diverticulitis, gastric ulcer, suprapubic catheter, and major depressive disorder. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 had intact cognition, she was dependent for toileting hygiene, required moderate assistance for personal hygiene, and she did not transfer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff followed required Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) while providing care for two residents (#36 and #5) of two residents observed for infection control. This failure to follow EBP has the potential to expose the residents and others to infection risk and had the potential to affect an additional 13 residents (#2, #7, #9, #10, #16, #27, #32, #47, #37, #47, #48, #49, #53 and #68) identified by the facility who also required EBP. The facility census was 52.Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 04/01/22 with diagnoses including osteomyelitis of the right femur, methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection, resistant to unspecified antibiotic, and infection of amputation stump. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed intact short term memory, frequent incontinence, and need for partial/moderate assistance with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #36, who required staff assistance with toileting hygiene, received timely incontinence care. This affected one resident (#36) of eight residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. The facility census was 52.Findings include: Record review for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 04/01/22. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure (CHF) and malaise. Review of the discharge return anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #36 was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder and required partial/moderate assistance with toileting hygiene.Review of the care plan dated 04/27/26 revealed Resident #36 had potential for bladder incontinence related to required assistance with ADL. Interventions included assisting to the bathroom with usual rounds and on demand and to clean peri area with each incontinent episode.Observation on 04/27/2026 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, review of facility transportation logs and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure appointments were scheduled, transportation was arranged and appointments were attended as ordered by the physician. This affected one resident (#22) of three residents reviewed for appointments outside of the facility. The facility census was 52.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 02/22/24. Diagnoses included Multiple Sclerosis, overactive bladder, chronic pain syndrome, and history of other diseases of the digestive system. Review of the 03/11/26 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 for Resident #22 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 which indicated intact cognition. Resident #22 was noted to require set up for toileting hygiene and noted to be occasionally incontinent. Review of the nursing progress note dated 06/23/25 at 6:37 A.M. for Resident #22 revealed on the evening of 06/22/25,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene and change gloves between treating multiple wounds on Resident #5 during wound care observation and did not cleanse each wound prior to treatment. This affected one resident (#5) of two residents observed for wound care. The facility census was 52.Findings include:Record review for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 03/30/26. Diagnoses included chronic systolic congestive heart failure, acute kidney failure and weakness.Review of the Medicare five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 was cognitively intact. Resident #5 was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, chair/bed to chair transfer and required partial/moderate assistance for bed mobility. Resident #5 had three Stage II pressure ulcers (partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red, pink wound bed, without slough, may also present as an intact or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, facility policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were implemented for Residents #8 and #69. This affected two residents (#8 and #69) of four residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 52.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including epilepsy, diabetes mellitus, and dysphagia. Review of the care plan, dated 01/05/23 with a revision on 06/05/24, revealed Resident #8 was at risk for falls related to poor safety awareness, unsteady gait, risk of medication side effects, and incontinence. Interventions dated 06/05/24 included ensuring the call light was within reach and nonskid footwear when out of bed. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 was severely cognitively impaired and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADL) except…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement pharmacy recommendations from its monthly drug regimen review for one resident (#33) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 52.Findings include:Record review for Resident #33 revealed an original admission date of 07/17/25 with a readmission date of 09/09/25. Diagnoses included generalized anxiety disorder and depression. Review of the Modification of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #33 was cognitively intact. Resident #33 was feeling down, depressed or hopeless, had trouble falling or staying asleep, had been feeling bad about himself, felt he was a failure or have let himself or his family down, and had trouble concentrating on things. Review of the care plan dated 09/12/25 revealed Resident #33 had a psychosocial wellbeing problem related to anxiety, depression, recent admission, repeat hospitalizations and a recent right and left below the knee…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-11 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure that clinically diagnosed food allergies were accurately identified, documented, communicated, and honored for Resident #57. This affected one resident (#57) out of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 52.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 03/26/26 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and anxiety disorder. Resident #57 had documented food allergies to banana, dairy products, fish, gluten, lactose, peanuts, pork derived products, soy, and tomatoes as recorded in the electronic medical record.Review of the physician's orders and the diet ticket for April 2026 revealed an order for a low concentrated sweets diet with regular texture and liquids. The diet ticket incorrectly listed only shellfish and peanuts as allergies, omitting multiple documented allergies including gluten, lactose, soy, and others.Observation of the lunch tray pass on 04/27/26 at 11:48…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-11 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and facility policy review, the failed to provide liquids at the ordered consistency for Resident #68. This issue affected one resident (#68) of two residents reviewed for thickened liquids. The facility identified two residents (#13 and #68) with orders for thickened liquids. The facility census was 52.Findings include:Resident #68 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and anxiety disorder. The admission MDS 3.0 was still in progress. Physician orders for April 2026 specified a no added salt diet with pureed texture and nectar-thick liquids. The resident also required a divided plate. The diet ticket matched these orders, listing NAS diet, pureed texture, and nectar-thick cranberry juice and milk.On 04/27/26 at 9:04 A.M., Resident #68 was observed eating breakfast. The cranberry juice provided was nectar thick, but the milk appeared thinner than the ordered consistency. At 9:05 A.M., the Assistant Director…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate medical record documentation for one resident (#5) of two residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 52.Findings include:Record review showed Resident #5 was admitted on [DATE] with multiple pressure ulcers present on admission. Physician orders dated 04/28/26 directed the application of Triad cream and dry dressings to four wound sites.On 04/29/26 at 11:11 A.M., the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #619 perform wound care for Resident #5. During this observation, LPN #619 did not cleanse multiple wounds before applying new treatments, did not consistently change gloves or perform hand hygiene between wound sites, and identified a wound that should have had a dressing in place but did not. LPN #619 also confirmed that none of the wound care orders included instructions to cleanse wounds prior to treatment.During the interview at 11:47 A.M., the Wound Care Nurse/Assistant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

$81,720 in federal fines across 10 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $26,685 — penalty dated 2026-05-11
• $4,938 — penalty dated 2024-02-20
• $4,938 — penalty dated 2024-02-12
• $14,814 — penalty dated 2024-01-22
• $4,938 — penalty dated 2024-01-08
• $4,235 — penalty dated 2024-01-02
• $10,586 — penalty dated 2023-12-11
• $2,823 — penalty dated 2023-11-20
• $2,470 — penalty dated 2023-11-13
• $5,293 — penalty dated 2023-10-23
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-05-29 for 13 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $525K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH