Ohman Family Living At Briar

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 170 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 47.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 53 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.74 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 93% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 92.0 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.49 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.55 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.61 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, interviews, review of manufacture's guidelines and facility policy review, the facility failed to clean a glucometer machine (a machine used to check blood sugars utilizing a drop of a person's blood). This affected one resident (#83) of five residents observed for medication administration and had the potential to affect one additional resident (#114) identified by the facility as utilizing the same glucometer. The facility also failed to follow contact precautions for Resident #5. This affected one resident (#5) of eight residents reviewed for infection control and had the potential to affect one additional resident (#60) identified by the facility as being on contact precautions. In addition, the facility failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for Resident #21. This affected one resident (#21) of eight residents reviewed for infection control and had the potential to affect 44 additional residents (#3, #4, #8, #9, #10, #14, #15, #16, #18, #20, #22, #23, #26,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of beneficiary notification and interview, the facility failed to ensure Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) was issued to residents discharged from a Medicare Part A stay. This affected three (Residents #118, #119, and #120) of the three discharged records reviewed for beneficiary notification. The facility census was 92.Findings include:Review of the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) for Resident #118 revealed the last covered day of a Medicare Part A covered service was 10/21/25. The facility was unable to provide documentation the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) was provided to the resident/representative. Review of the NOMNC for Resident #119 revealed the last covered day of a Medicare Part A covered service was 09/06/25. The facility was unable to provide documentation the SNF ABN was provided to the resident/representative. Review of the NOMNC for Resident #120 revealed the last covered day of a Medicare Part A covered service was 11/26/25. The facility was unable to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accommodation was made for Resident #65 to participate in an activity of choice. This affected one resident (#65) of two residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 92.Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #65 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, morbid (severe) obesity, borderline personality disorder, and legal blindness.Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #65 was cognitively intact and was dependent for toileting hygiene, showers, dressing, and personal hygiene.Interview on 03/02/26 at 12:15 P.M. with Resident #65 revealed she was banned from participating in activities which resulted in her no longer being able to play bingo telephonically due to Resident #65's impaired vision with the assistance of staff from her bedroom. Bingo was played by one staff member in the activity room having the phone on the speaker function and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview review of the Stand Up (Chorus) Patient Lift Manual and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision/assistive devices to prevent avoidable accidents/falls. This affected one resident (Resident #10) out of four reviewed for accidents/falls. This had the potential to affect 48 residents (Resident # #3, #4, #5, #6, #10, #11, #14, #15, #17, #18, #19, #20, #23, #25, #26, #28, #30, #31, #32, #36, #38, #39, #41, #44, #46, #50, #52, #55, #57, #60, #61, #65, #70, #71, #73, #75, #77, #80, #82, #83, #84, #85, #87, #89, #95, #96, #103, #106) that required a Chorus (operated lift designed to safely transition individuals with limited mobility from sitting to standing for transfers) or mechanical lift for transfer. The facility census was 92.Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #10 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Stage IV pressure ulcer (Full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure comfort measures were utilized for Resident #12. This affected one resident (#12) of three residents reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 92.Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #12 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses of radiculopathy lumbar region, type II diabetes with diabetic neuropathy, pain in the left ankle and joint, and pain in the right shoulder.Review of the care plan initiated on 10/15/25 and revised on 10/27/25 revealed Resident #12 suffered daily from pain in the legs, toes, right shoulder, and neck and has diagnoses of osteoarthritis and lumbar radiculopathy. Interventions included administering pain medications as order for pain relief, assessing effectiveness of pain medication, and assessing and monitoring for non-verbal signs of pain. The care plan did not include an intervention for an arm sling.Review of the care plan dated 10/15/25 and revised on 02/05/26…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, review of the facility Controlled Mediation Shift Change Log and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure accurate records for the receipt and disposition of controlled drugs for one of one medication cart (400 long hall) narcotic records reviewed. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving narcotic medications. The facility census was 92.Findings include:Observation on 03/03/26 at 7:30 A.M. of the narcotic count reconciliation between the night shift Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #477 and the day shift Registered Nurse (RN) #364 for the 400 Long Hall, revealed the pharmacy document titled, Controlled Medication Shift Change Log had missing second nurse signatures for the dates of 02/23/26, 02/24/26, 02/26/26, 03/02/26, and 03/03/26.Review of the facility two-sided document titled, Controlled Medication Shift Change Log revealed note additions and deletions on reverse side. Discrepancies are to be reported to nursing administration. There were two signatures required labeled, signature 1 and signature 2 for each…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure an accurate medical record for Resident #34. This affected one resident (#34) of five residents reviewed for medication orders. The facility census was 92.Findings include: Resident #34 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of hemiplegia (loss of muscle function) and hemiparesis (weakness), dysarthria (speech disorder), diabetes mellitus type two, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), hypertension (high blood pressure), major depression disorder, insomnia, and anxiety disorder.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #34 had a Brief Interview for mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition.Review of the electronic medical record Skilled Nurses Progress Note authored by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #441 dated 02/19/26 at 5:00 P.M., revealed the gastrostomy tube was removed by the physician that day.Review of Resident #34's electronic medical record Order Summary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a call light was functioning for Resident #26. This affected one resident (#26) of one resident who was investigated for a functioning call light. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for Resident #3. This affected one resident (#3) of one resident who was investigated for call lights within reach. The facility census was 92. Findings include:1. A review of Resident #26's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/05/25 and pertinent diagnoses included diabetes mellitus type II, chronic pain syndrome, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, Stage IV pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle; slough may be present on some parts of the wound bed) of the left heel, Stage III pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss, subcutaneous fat may be visible but bone, tendon or muscle are not exposed, slough may be present…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment for Resident #26. This affected one resident (#26) of three residents who were investigated for physical environment. The facility census was 92.Findings include:A review of Resident #26's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/05/25 and pertinent diagnoses included diabetes mellitus type II, chronic pain syndrome, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, Stage IV pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle; slough may be present on some parts of the wound bed) of the left heel, Stage III pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss, subcutaneous fat may be visible but bone, tendon or muscle are not exposed, slough may be present but does not obscure the depth of tissue loss, may include undermining) of the right heel, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder and insomnia.A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of facility policy, the facility did not ensure an allegation of verbal abuse was reported as required. This affected one resident (#68) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 89.Findings included: Review of medical record for Resident # 68 revealed an admission date of 08/03/23 with diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder, malnutrition, epilepsy, and dementia.Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #68 had severely impaired cognition and required staff assistance for all activities of daily living (ADLs).Review of the care plan for Resident #68, dated 06/09/25, revealed Resident #68 had impaired cognition related to dementia, schizoaffective disorder, mood problems related to dementia and intellectual disability. Interventions included to reorient as needed, keep explanations simple and use yes or no questions and if resident resists care, assure safety, back off and reapproach later. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH