Overbrook Center
333 Page Street, Middleport, OH 45760 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (740) 992-6472 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2022
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 1.3% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.7% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.2% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.8% | 0.4% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 15.9% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.5% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.2% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 45.3% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.1% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.5% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.4% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.9% | 75.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 12.4% | 24.9% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 3.9% | 12.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.84 | 1.73 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.40 | 1.80 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 46 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 65.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.8%CMS range 37.1–60.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.6%CMS range 9.0–19.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 65.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 60.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 52.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 95.2% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 5.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.1%CMS range 3.0–11.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.07 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 72.9 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.36 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.78 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
36 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-07 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility schedule, and interview the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. This had the potential to affect all 69 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include:Review of the facility schedules from 04/03/26 to 04/09/26 revealed on 04/05/26 the scheduled dayshift RN had called off and was not replaced with an RN. On 05/07/26 at 2:43 P.M., an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #528 verified the facility had not met required eight consecutive hours of RN coverage for 04/05/26. This deficiency represents noncompliance investigated under Complaint Number 3006363.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, resident interview, review of resident rights, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with respect and dignity and was given care in an environment that promoted enhancement of quality of life. This affected one of 20 sampled residents (Resident #39). The facility census was 69.Review of the record for Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 04/24/26 and diagnoses including diabetes, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, hypertension, and depression. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set completed on 04/29/26 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, indicating intact cognition. It stated the resident required partial/moderate assistance with showers. Interview with Resident #39 on 05/04/26 at 3:13 P.M. revealed there was a nursing assistant on evening/night shift (she only knew the first letter of her name who was later determined to be Nursing Assistant #555) who was loud and rude to her. She stated that last evening she had put her call light on because she needed a pain pill and Nursing Assistant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to document that quarterly care conferences were conducted and who attended the meetings. This affected three Residents (#2, #8, and #53) of three sampled for care conferences. The facility census was 69. 1. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/08/19, a re-entry date of 05/20/2025 and diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, chronic kidney disease stage 4, unspecified diastolic (congestive) heart failure, hypothyroidism, anemia, bipolar disorder, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, peripheral vascular disease, schizoaffective disorder, unspecified mood disorder, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #2's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a brief interview for mental status score of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Further review of Resident #2's MDS revealed the resident was dependent on facility staff for toileting hygiene, required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review the facility failed to ensure routine shaving, nail care, and/or showers were provided for Resident #4 and #6. This affected two residents (#4 and #6) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 69. Findings Include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an initial admission date of 08/17/22 with the latest readmission of 06/18/24. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, benign prostatic hyperplasia, protein calorie malnutrition, major depressive disorder, acquired absence of right foot, anemia, cirrhosis of liver, ascites, hypertension, ischemic cardiomyopathy, retention of urine, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dysphagia, insomnia, and atrial fibrillation. Review of the care plan dated 08/18/22 revealed the resident had an activity of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit and potential for fluctuations in ADL related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #55's peripheral inserted central catheter (PICC) dressing was changed as ordered. This affected one (Resident #55) of one resident reviewed for PICC dressings. The census was 69.Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include but are not limited to localization-related idiopathic epilepsy and epileptic syndromes with seizures of localized onset, paroxysmal fibrillation, and atherosclerosis atrial fibrillation. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #55 revealed an order dated 04/25/2026 to change the dressing to the midline weekly and as needed every night shift every Thursday until 05/05/2026 at 11:59 P.M.Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed that the dressing change was signed off as completed by the LPN on 04/30/2026.On 05/05/2026 at 9:40 A.M. during medication observation Resident #55 was observed with a PICC line…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure pressure relieving interventions were implemented as ordered. This affected one resident (#6) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcer. The facility census was 69. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an initial admission date of 08/17/22 with the latest readmission of 06/18/24. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, benign prostatic hyperplasia, protein calorie malnutrition, major depressive disorder, acquired absence of right foot, anemia, cirrhosis of liver, ascites, hypertension, ischemic cardiomyopathy, retention of urine, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dysphagia, insomnia, and atrial fibrillation. Review of the care plan dated 03/30/26 revealed the resident had the potential for pressure ulcer development related to decreased mobility and incontinence. Interventions included air mattress to bed, administer treatments as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure contracture maintenance devices were in place as physician ordered. This affected one resident (#5) of one resident reviewed for range of motion (ROM). The facility census was 69. Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an initial admission date of 07/30/16 with the latest readmission of 01/12/26. Diagnoses included cerebrovascular accident with left sided hemiplegia, chronic respiratory failure, diabetes mellitus, bipolar disorder, anemia, benign prostatic hyperplasia, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety disorder, diverticulosis of intestine, insomnia, hyperlipidemia, dysphagia, mood disorder, contracture of left foot, pseudobulbar affect, major depressive disorder and contracture of left hand. Review of the care plan dated 02/13/25 revealed the resident had an alteration in musculoskeletal status related to contracture left foot and left hand. Interventions included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing levels to meet the total care needs of residents. This affected five residents (Resident #6, #39, #43, #44 and one anonymous resident) of 69 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include:1. On 05/04/26 at 9:53 A.M., an interview with Resident #4 revealed he was upset because he did not receive his shower on Saturday 05/02/26 and he stated, I stink. The resident stated, The aide said they were too busy to do showers. On 05/07/26 at 1:04 P.M., interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #562 revealed she did not work at the facility on 05/02/26. She revealed she worked 05/04/26 and the resident was upset he had not received his scheduled shower on 05/02/26 so she ensured he had a shower on 05/04/26. 2. On 05/06/26 at 2:35 P.M.Resident #43 asked for assistance to get out of bed. The resident was informed the surveyor could not assist her out of bed but would alert someone to assist her and the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately document resident care in the medical record. This affected two residents (Resident #4 and #55) of 20 residents reviewed for accurate medical records.The facility census was 69. Findings include:1.On 05/05/2026 at 9:40 A.M. during medication observation Resident #55 was observed with a PICC line dressing date 04/24/2026 on the right arm. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) on 05/05/2026 revealed that the dressing change was signed off as completed by LPN on 04/30/2026. Interview on 05/05/2026 at 10:30 A.M. with LPN revealed the date on the right arm PICC line dressing was dated 04/24/2026 and is to be changed per the order every Thursday during night Shift. During this interview, Resident #55 confirmed that the dressing had not been since it was applied on 04/24/2026. Interview on 05/06/2026 at 6:45 A.M. with the LPN revealed that the PICC line dressing change for Resident #55 was signed off on 04/30/2026 but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to implement infection control procedures related to maintaining enhanced barrier precautions and glove use. This affected three of 20 sampled residents (Residents #6, #39, and #55). The facility census was 69.1. Record review revealed a physician's order for Resident #39 to receive insulin (Lispro) 15 units subcutaneous. Observations on 05/04/26 at 4:00 P.M. revealed LPN #519 to administer an insulin injection to Resident #39's abdomen. LPN #519 did not wear gloves to administer the injection. Interview with LPN #519 on 05/04/26 at 4:05 P.M. revealed he was supposed to wear gloves to give an injection but did not. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 05/05/26 at 1:25 P.M. confirmed staff were to wear gloves when administering insulin. Review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration : Subcutaneous insulin dated 01/23 revealed staff were to put on gloves prior to giving the injection. 2. Observations…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-01 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of Medicare (MCR) liability notice letters, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents, whose skilled nursing services ended with days remaining, received at least a 48 hour notice of their skilled service ending prior to their last covered day. They also failed to ensure those residents, whose skilled service ended and remained in the facility, were provided an Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) as required. This affected three residents (#1, #17, and #56) of three residents reviewed for liability notices. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission date of 01/08/24. Her diagnoses included schizophrenia, unspecified dementia, delusional disorder, and Bipolar disorder. Her payer status was MCR Part A before being switched to Medicaid (MCD). Review of a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Beneficiary Protection Notification Review Checklist revealed Resident #1 had a MCR Part A skilled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and representative interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure timely and adequate nail care was completed for a resident who was dependent upon staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). This affected one resident (#18) out of the three residents reviewed for ADL's during the annual survey. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Record review for Resident #18 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including senile degeneration of the brain, encounter for palliative care, and dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/13/24, revealed the resident was assessed to be rarely/never understood. The resident was assessed to be dependent upon staff for personal hygiene. Review of the care plan, revised 09/18/23, revealed the resident had an ADL self-care performance deficit. Interventions included showers two times a week with hair and nail care. Review of the care plan, dated 04/03/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's pressure ulcer was assessed weekly for signs of healing/ infection as per the plan of care. This affected one resident (#59) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: Review of Resident #59's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included a stroke with hemiplegia/ hemiparesis affecting his left, non-dominant side, peripheral vascular disease status post peripheral vascular angioplasty, muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, cognitive communication deficit, aphasia, attention and concentration deficit, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, adult onset diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure and anemia. Review of Resident #59's nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with some bruising and skin tears to his upper extremities. He was not known to have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was changed according to physician orders. This affected one resident (#43) reviewed for respiratory care during the annual survey. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Record review for Resident #43 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and muscle weakness. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/15/24, revealed the resident was assessed to have mildly impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 12. The resident was assessed to have been administered oxygen therapy during the review period. Review of the care plan, dated 06/13/24, revealed the resident had altered respiratory status. Interventions included oxygen administration at two to four liters per minute by nasal cannula. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure orders for as needed psychotropic medications included a duration of therapy and additionally failed to ensure psychotropic medications were administered for appropriate indications. This affected two residents (#18 and #25) out of the five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the annual survey. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #18 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including senile degeneration of the brain, encounter for palliative care, anxiety, and dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/13/24, revealed the resident was assessed to be rarely/never understood. The resident was assessed to have received anti-anxiety medications during the review period. Review of the active physicians order, dated 02/07/24, revealed an order for 0.5 milligrams (mg) of Ativan (an anti-anxiety medication) to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, resident interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that all allegations of abuse/mistreatment were reported immediately to the administrator of the facility. This affected one of 69 residents (Resident #15). Findings include: Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #75 on 01/29/24 at 5:03 A.M. revealed that, approximately a week prior, State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #76 had bragged to her about cursing at Resident #15 because he cursed at her. LPN #75 stated she had reported this to Registered Nurse (RN) #77, who was working that night and was her supervisor. LPN #75 stated she did not know if the administrator was aware of the allegation or not. Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 07/30/16 and diagnoses including hemiplegia following a cerebral infarction, diabetes, and bipolar disorder. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed 12/08/23 revealed a brief interview for mental status score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Review of the record did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-10-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and facility policy review the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a sanitary manner and resident refrigerator temps were not monitored and adjusted as needed for increased temperatures. The food storage issue had the potential to affect all 74 residents receiving food from the facility kitchen (Residents #48 and # 276 do not receive food from the kitchen). The preparing and serving of food issue had the ability to affect all ten residents (Residents #6, #20, #25, #28, #31, #32, #40, #46, #51, and #69) who received pureed corn and one Resident (#30) who received a meatloaf sandwich. The resident refrigerator issue affected all thirteen residents (Residents #2, #5, #11, #19, #30, #32, #39, #41, #52, #60, #65, #67 and #68) who had personal refrigerators in their rooms. The nursing unit refrigerator issues had the potential affected all residents receiving items from those refrigerators in the facility. The facility census was 76. Findings included: 1. Observation on 10/25/22 at 11:10 A.M. of the walk-in refrigerator in the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-31 · tag F0644 — patternCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure new Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR's) were completed for residents receiving new mental illness diagnoses after their admission into the facility. This affected six (Resident #14, #23, #28, #40, #46, and #65) of six residents reviewed for PASARR's. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #46's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses at the time of her admission included anxiety disorder and bipolar disorder. Her diagnoses list was updated to include the diagnoses of major depressive disorder on 09/13/19 and schizo-affective disorder on 10/26/21. A review of Resident #46's PASARR Identification Screen dated 09/13/18 revealed the resident was not identified as having had any mental illness diagnoses at the time the assessment was completed. A mood disorder was not marked despite the resident having the diagnoses of major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder at the time the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and facility policy review the facility failed to maintain proper hand hygiene while providing care services to Resident #48's gastrostomy tube and during dining observation. This affected one Resident (#48) of one resident reviewed for tube feeding and 23 residents receiving meals in their room on the 200 hall (Residents #4, #6, #10, #11, #18, #12, #14, #27, #30, #33, #34, #36, #41, #43, #44, #46, #53, #56, #65, #68, #69, #123, #124). The facility census was 76. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #48's medical record revealed he was initially admitted on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE] with the diagnoses of quadriplegia, contracture of the right hand, essential hypertension, dysphagia, contracture of the left knee, and unspecified intracranial injury without loss of consciousness. Review of Resident #48's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed severely impaired cognition and an abdominal gastrostomy tube. Observation on 10/25/22 at 10:48 A.M. of Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-31 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to notify a resident's physician of a change in condition related to a significant weight gain. This affected one (Resident #23) of 24 resident records reviewed. The census was 76. Findings include: Review of Resident #23's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic kidney disease, hypertensive heart disease, diabetes, A-fib and depression and schizoaffective disorder. Review of Resident #23's minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was intact, he required extensive assistance of two or more staff members for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and toilet use. He required extensive assistance of one staff member for personal hygiene. Review of physician orders revealed an order dated 09/24/22 for daily weights due to congestive heart failure (CHF) and notify physician if greater than…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of self-reported incident (SRI), review of the facility investigation, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#73) was free from physical and verbal abuse. This affected one of one resident reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 76. Findings Included: Review of the medical record for Resident #73 revealed an initial admission date of 02/02/22 with the admitting diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cervicalgia, generalized weakness, difficulty in walking, repeated falls, reduced mobility, chronic respiratory failure, low back pain, arthritis, asthma, hypertension, fecal impaction, hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia and personal history of COVID-19. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #73 had no cognitive deficit as indicated by a Brief Interview for Mental Status of 15. The resident required extensive assistance of two staff for bed transfer, bed mobility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-31 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#66) was free from restraints. This affected one of one resident reviewed for restraints. The facility census was 76. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #66 revealed an initial admission date of 06/21/22 with the latest readmission of 08/15/22 with the admitting diagnoses including dementia with severe agitation, protein calorie malnutrition, fracture of the sacrum, fracture of the rim of the right pubis, schizoaffective disorder, fracture of fifth lumbar, hyperlipidemia, chronic atrial fibrillation, anxiety disorder, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, low back pain, fracture of left pubis, nondisplaced fracture of zone one of sacrum, encephalitis, anemia, vascular dementia, herpes virus vesicular dermatitis, hypothyroidism, major depressive disorder, allergic rhinitis, osteoarthritis and hypertension. Review of the plan of care dated 08/17/22 revealed the resident used a physical restraint, tilt-n-space wheelchair related to comfort,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-31 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed accurately in the areas of active diagnoses, falls, and range of motion. This affected three (Resident #40, #46, and #63) of 24 residents reviewed for assessments. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #46's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included protein- calorie malnutrition. The diagnosis was added to her diagnoses list on 09/07/22. A review of Resident #46's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed section (I.) coded the resident's active diagnoses. The section for nutritional diagnoses (I 5600) included a place to code malnutrition (protein or calorie) as an active diagnosis, but it was not marked despite the resident having that diagnosis since 09/07/22. On 10/27/22 at 10:02 A.M., an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) was held and she was informed Resident #46's quarterly MDS assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-31 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's (#233) baseline plan of care addressed Clostridium difficile infection (c-diff) and isolation to prevent the potential spread of c-diff. This affected one of 24 sampled residents. Findings Included: Review of the medical record for Resident #233 revealed an admission date of 10/20/22 with the admitting diagnoses of acute post-hemorrhagic anemia, hemorrhage of anus and rectum, atrial fibrillation diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, hyperlipidemia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, depression, anxiety, hypothyroidism and presence of cardiac pacemaker. Review of the admission nursing assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was admitted to the facility following an acute care hospital stay with the diagnoses of gastro-intestinal bleed, anemia and c-diff. The assessment indicated the resident was continent of bowel. Review of the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed for a resident with the diagnosis of schizo-affective disorder. This affected one (Resident #46) of 24 residents reviewed for care plans. Findings include: A review of Resident #46's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included schizo-affective disorder (a mental health condition including schizophrenia and mood disorder symptoms). A review of Resident #46's active care plans revealed the resident did not have a care plan in place to address her diagnosis of schizo-affective disorder. None of the existing care plans addressed any behaviors related to her diagnosis of schizo-affective disorder. On 10/27/22 at 10:10 A.M., an interview with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #105 revealed Resident #46 was known to yell out when needing to go to the bathroom or after she already did and needed to be changed. She denied the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the care plan of Resident #14 was revised with changes in physician's orders. This affected one Resident (#14) of five residents reviewed for respiratory concerns. The facility census was 76. Findings included: Review of Resident #14's medical record revealed she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease stage one, cardiomyopathy (disease that makes it difficult for the heart to pump blood), and nonrheumatic aortic stenosis (narrowing of the heart's aortic valve). Review of Resident #14's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she was cognitively independent and received oxygen therapy. Review of Resident #14's physician order dated 10/21/22 revealed administer oxygen at two liters/minutes via a nasal cannula for shortness of breath or when her pulse oximetry is below 90%, check pulse oximetry in one or 30 minutes, discontinue oxygen when the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to follow physician orders in regard to obtaining daily weights . This affected one (Resident #23) of 24 resident records reviewed. The census was 76. Findings include: Review of Resident #23's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic kidney disease, hypertensive heart disease, diabetes, A-fib and depression and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the minimum data set (MDS) assessment 08/22/22 revealed his cognition was intact, he required extensive assistance of two or more staff members for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and toilet use. He required extensive assistance of one staff member for personal hygiene. Review of physician orders revealed an order dated 09/04/22 for daily weights due to congestive heart failure (CHF) and notify physician if greater than three pounds. Further review revealed no documentation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-31 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was seen by an ophthalmologist for treatment of cataracts as referred by the optometrist. This affected one (Resident #65) of three residents reviewed for vision/ hearing. Findings include: A review of Resident #65's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included cataract extraction status of an unspecified eye. A review of Resident #65's Medicare (MCR) 5 day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident did not have any communication issues and was cognitively intact. Her vision was indicated to be adequate with the use of corrective lenses. No behaviors or rejection of care was noted. A review of Resident #65's active care plans revealed she had a care plan in place for having impaired peripheral visual function related to a stroke and left sided vision loss. She required large print to be able to see/ read. Interventions included arranging…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview , the facility failed to ensure interventions were in place for pressure ulcers. This affected one (Resident #29) of five residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The census was 76. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included ASHD, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), osteoporosis, and chronic pain syndrome. Review of the minimum data set (MDS) assessment 09/06/22 revealed her cognition was not intact. She required limited assistance of one staff member for transfers, dressing and personal hygiene. She required supervision with set up help only for bed mobility and toileting. Review of the physician orders revealed an order dated 07/25/22 for heel float boot to the left foot while in bed. Resident #29 has a Stage 2 (partial-thickness loss of skin with exposed dermis, presenting as a shallow open ulcer) pressure ulcer to the left heel. Observations on 10/26/22 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-31 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's (#40) contracture prevention devices were implemented as physician ordered. This affected one of five residents reviewed for limited range of motion. Findings Included: Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an initial admission date of 04/07/21 with the admitting diagnoses of dementia, reduced mobility, schizoaffective disorder, allergic rhinitis, dysphagia, personal history of COVID-19, pseudobulbar affect, hypertension, obesity, anemia, polyneuropathy, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder and generalized muscle weakness. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a moderate cognitive impairment. The resident was dependent on two staff for activities of daily living. The assessment indicated the resident had no deficits in range of motion to upper or lower extremities. The assessment indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure dietary intake was accurately measured and documented and failed to ensure nutritional supplements were administered as ordered . This affected two Resident (#48 and #69) of seven residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 76. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #48's medical record revealed he was initially admitted on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE] with the diagnoses of quadriplegia contracture right hand, essential hypertension, dysphagia, contracture left knee, and unspecified intracranial injury without loss of consciousness. Review of Resident #48's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed severely impaired cognition and an abdominal gastrostomy tube. Review of Resident #48's weights revealed on 04/26/2022, the resident weighed 154.6 pounds (lbs.) and on 07/18/2022, the resident weighed 149 pounds which was a -3.62 % Loss. Review of Resident #48's nutrition progress note dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident oxygen was delivered at the flow rate ordered by the physician and respiratory equipment was stored properly. This affected two Resident (#14 and #31) of five residents reviewed for respiratory concerns. The facility census was 76. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #14's medical record revealed she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease stage one, cardiomyopathy (disease that makes it difficult for the heart to pump blood), and nonrheumatic aortic stenosis (narrowing of the heart's aortic valve). Review of Resident #14's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she was cognitively independent and received oxygen therapy. Review of Resident #14's physician order dated 10/21/22 revealed administer oxygen at two liters/minutes via a nasal cannula for shortness of breath or when her pulse oximetry is below 90%, check…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-31 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the physician responded with a rationale for no action taken on recommendations made by the pharmacist in the Medication Regimen Review (MRR). This affected two Residents (#28 and #67) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 76. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side, essential hypertension, hypothyroidism, and dysphagia. Review of Resident #28's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed he was not cognitively independent and had an active diagnoses of depression, psychotic disorder, and schizophrenia. Review of Note to Attending Physician/Prescriber dated 09/29/21 for Resident #28 revealed the resident had been taking the antipsychotic Zyprexa 5 milligrams every evening since October 2021. The physician was asked to please…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-31 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident receiving an antipsychotic medication was monitored for resident specific target behaviors. This affected one (Resident #46) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: A review of Resident #46's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included schizo-affective disorder, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. A review of Resident #46's physician orders revealed the resident had an order to receive Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication) 25 milligrams (mg) by mouth (po) every morning and 50 mg po at bedtime for schizo-affective disorder. The order had been in place since 01/18/22. She also had an order to receive Lexapro (an antidepressant) 10 mg po ever night at bedtime for depression. The orders indicated the resident's target behaviors for the antidepressant was sad/ worried facial expressions, decreased appetite…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-31 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure the facility medication error rates were not 5% or greater, with 30 opportunities for error and two actual observed errors resulting in a medication administration error rate of 6.67% . This affected two (Resident #2 and Resident #36) of three residents observed for medication administration. The census was 76. Findings include: 1. Observation on 10/25/22 at 7:24 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #27 administer the following medications to Resident #2, Amlidopine 10 mg (milligrams), ASA (aspirin) 81 mg, Cranberry 500 mg tablet, Colace 100 mg, Flovent (asthma therapy)110 mcg (Micrograms) two puffs, Magnesium Oxide (mineral supplement) 400 mg, Potassium 10 meq(milliequivalent), Memantine 10 mg and Vitamin C (supplement) 500 mg . LPN #27 administered Flovent two puffs, one right after the other without waiting in-between. LPN #27 failed to instruct resident on holding breath in and failed to instruct him to rinse his mouth after administration of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-31 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to obtain laboratory tests ordered by the physician. This affected two (Resident #44 and #67) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #44's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, cognitive communication disorder, dementia, anxiety, insomnia and depression. Review of the admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was not intact. He required supervision of one staff members physical assistance for bed mobility, extensive assistance of one staff members physical assistance for transfers, dressing and toileting and limited assistance of once staff members physical assistance for personal hygiene. Review of the Physician orders revealed an order on 09/15/22 for PT/INR weekly (Resident receives Coumadin which is a blood thinning medication). Review of the lab results revealed they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEIGS COUNTY CARE CENTER INC. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 49% | since 07/01/1988 |
| OVERBROOK HOLDING LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 02/28/2018 |
| BROWN, HAROLD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | 49% | since 07/01/1988 |
| WRIGHT, RANDY | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 12/19/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $527K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365721. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.