Carecore At Minster

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 40 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 83 beds and averages 60.6 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.45 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.65 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of a Facility Reported Incident, review of police report, review of hospital records, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure a cognitively impaired resident was free from physical abuse by a facility staff member. This resulted in physical harm when Resident #01 was forcefully pushed down on to a bed by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #200 causing physical injuries of bruising, skin impairments and pain. During the incident, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #202 observed and failed to intervene to protect Resident #01 from abuse. This affected one (#01) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 55. Findings include:Review of the medical record of Resident #01 revealed an admission date of 11/26/24. Diagnoses include unspecified psychosis, depressive disorder, Alzheimer's disease, and dementia.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #01 was cognitively impaired and required set-up…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital records, and staff and Physician #850 interviews, the facility failed to ensure a newly admitted resident received appropriate diabetes care when the facility staff failed to clarify a resident's diabetes diagnosis and the need for blood sugar monitoring and insulin administration. This resulted in Actual Harm when staff failed to monitor Resident #04's blood sugars and the resident subsequently had a change in condition resulting in hospitalization and a diagnosis of hyperglycemia requiring intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SQ) insulin administration and (IV) fluids. Additionally, the facility failed to have blood glucose monitoring and insulin in place for Resident #38, which placed the resident at risk for more than minimal harm. This affected two (Residents #04 and #38) of three residents reviewed for diabetes management. The facility census was 50. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #04 revealed an admission date of 08/17/23.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, review of manufacturer instructions, and policy review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in a safe and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all residents who receive food from the kitchen. The facility identified one (#10) resident that did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 56.Findings include:1. Observation of the kitchen on 09/15/25 at 7:49 A.M. revealed one of the two hand washing sinks did not have paper towels to dry hands, the two storage shelves under the preparation tables were covered in a greasy debris. Additional observation revealed greasy debris in the cabinet shelf above the preparation table. The findings were confirmed by Dietary [NAME] (DC) #310 at the time of the observation.2. Observation on 09/15/25 at 7:55 A.M. of the of the four flavor cold beverage juice dispenser revealed a sticky dried on substance on all four nozzles. Further observation revealed a sticky dried substance on top of and under the shelf that holds the bottles of concentrate in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, observations, staff interviews, and review of the Long- Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to ensure accurate coding on Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. This affected one (#50) of five residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 56. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 09/01/24 with medical diagnoses including convulsions, diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, and Down syndrome. Review of the medical diagnoses revealed on 08/04/25 Resident #50 was given a diagnosis of a pathological fracture of the right humerus. Review of the medical record for Resident #50 revealed no documentation to support a diagnosis of osteoporosis prior to 08/03/25. Review of the medical record for Resident #50 revealed a discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/16/25, which indicated Resident #50 had moderate cognitive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to develop a plan of care to address resident's with a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder. This affected two (#7 and #43) of two residents review for PTSD. The facility census was 56.Findings include:1. Review of medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 05/30/25 with diagnoses including but not limited to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and dementia.Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #7 was assessed with PTSD.Review of Resident #7's care plan dated 05/30/25 revealed no care plan addressing the resident's PTSD.Review of a psychiatric note dated 08/19/25 revealed Resident #7's PTSD listed as a diagnosis but was not addressed.Interview on 09/17/25 at 11:26 A.M. with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #345 revealed the CNA did not know what Resident #7's PTSD was related…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of fall investigation reports, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were updated with current fall interventions. This affected one (#50) of five reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 56. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 09/01/24 with medical diagnoses including convulsions, diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, and Down syndrome. Review of the medical record for Resident #50 revealed an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] which indicated Resident #50 had moderately impaired cognition, was independent with bed mobility, transfers, and ambulation up to 10 feet, and required supervision with ambulation up to 50 and 150 feet. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #50 did not use a wheelchair. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #50 had two or more falls with no injury since readmission on [DATE]. Review of the fall care plan, dated 09/23/24, revealed Resident #50 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident representative interview, staff interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to assist residents in attending scheduled activities of their preference and on a consistent basis. This affected two (#10 and #9) of three residents sampled for activities. The facility census was 56.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy and aphasia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #10 revealed the resident was completely dependent for all care and exhibited no rejection of care or behavioral issues. Review of the care plan dated 09/16/25 for Resident #10 revealed the resident was dependent on staff for all activities with interventions to bring the resident to the activity room to be around other residents during activities and to escort the resident to activities they may be interested in. Review of an order dated 05/30/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure orders for dressing changes were completed as ordered. This affected one (#44) of two residents sampled for dressing changes. The facility census was 56.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #44 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified atrial fibrillation and diabetes mellitus with neuropathy.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #44 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognitive function.Review of the care plan for Resident #44 dated 09/18/25 revealed Resident #44 was at risk for impaired skin integrity due to a left lower extremity contusion and a left posterior ankle blister. Interventions included to provide treatment as ordered.Review of physician orders for Resident #44 revealed an order dated 09/12/25 for a dressing to the left lower leg contusion with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, review of a dialysis binder, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate and appropriate clinical information was provided to and received from a dialysis provider to ensure coordination of care. This affected one (#4) of one residents reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 56.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 07/31/25 with diagnoses including but not limited to end stage renal disease, non-compliance with renal dialysis for other reasons, and dependence on renal dialysis.Review of current physician orders revealed Resident #4 was scheduled for dialysis treatments on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays.Review of a care plan dated 07/31/25 revealed Resident #4 had renal failure related to end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. Interventions included to auscultate heart and lung sounds, check bruit and thrill (a thrill is a palpable, buzzing sensation or vibration felt on the skin overlying a blood vessel due to turbulent blood flow, while a bruit is the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, staff interview, and Medical Director interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from unnecessary medications including duplicate drug therapy. This affected one (#45) of three residents reviewed for antibiotic use. The facility census was 56.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #45 revealed an admission date of 06/13/24 with medical diagnoses including anxiety, anemia, chronic kidney disease stage III, and personal history of urinary tract infection (UTI). Review of the medical record for Resident #45 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/15/25, that revealed Resident #45 had moderate cognitive impairment and required partial/moderate staff assistance with toilet hygiene, and substantial/maximum staff assistance with bathing, bed mobility, and transfers. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #45 received an antibiotic medication. Review of the medical record for Resident #45 revealed a nurse's notes dated 11/20/24 at 1:20 P.M. which documented the doctor assessed Resident #45,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, recipe review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure pureed food was prepared in a manner that preserved flavor and nutrition. This had the potential to affect three (#12, #22, and #56) of three residents identified by the facility as being on a diet with pureed meat. The facility census was 56.Findings include:Observation on 09/15/25 at 9:41 A.M. revealed Dietary [NAME] (DC) #310 prepared country fried steak with a pureed texture. Continued observation revealed DC #310 placed five portions of the country fried steak into the food processor. DC #310 proceeded to add water to puree the meat. DC #310 placed the pureed steak into a container, covered with foil, and placed it in the oven for service.Review of the undated recipe titled, Country Fried Steak with Cream Gravy, revealed pureed food characteristics included puree being smooth without lumps, held its shape on a plate, was soft pudding like consistency, liquid did not separate from the solid and it did not need to be chewed. Further review revealed the procedure for preparation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, staff interview, physician interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the antibiotic stewardship program was followed per policy. This affected one (#45) of three residents reviewed for antibiotic use. The facility census was 56.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #45 revealed an admission date of 06/13/24 with medical diagnoses including anxiety, anemia, chronic kidney disease stage III, and personal history of urinary tract infection (UTI). Review of the medical record for Resident #45 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/15/25, that revealed Resident #45 had moderate cognitive impairment and required partial/moderate staff assistance with toilet hygiene, and substantial/maximum staff assistance with bathing, bed mobility, and transfers. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #45 received an antibiotic medication.Review of the medical record for Resident #45 revealed a nurse's notes dated 11/20/24 at 1:20 P.M. which documented the doctor assessed Resident #45, reviewed the chart, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$28,743 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $28,743 — penalty dated 2025-07-21
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-12-28 for 15 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $579K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH