No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Country Court

1076 Coshocton Ave, Mount Vernon, OH 43050 · For profit - Corporation · 84 certified beds · (740) 397-4125 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Dec 2022Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 immediate-jeopardy citations$15,593 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Dec 2022
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $15,593 in federal fines (most recent 2023-12-05)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1330 Coshocton Avenue, Knox Medical Pavilion · (740) 393-9024 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1330 Coshocton Ave · (740) 326-3485 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi0.5 mi
1545 Coshocton Ave · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
100 Sychar Rd · (740) 393-9501 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.6%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.3%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms9.0%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.6%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.7%6.1%16.1%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication30.6%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.6%3.4%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.9%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.9%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.3%75.6%79.4%typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 52 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

53.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF53.0%CMS range 40.9–64.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.9%CMS range 7.9–16.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.1%CMS range 4.3–16.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.101.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.66
RN hours/ resident / day
0.67
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.20
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.53
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.35
RN hoursweekends
36.6%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 84 beds and averages 47.0 residents a day — about 56% occupied, or roughly 37 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.73 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-02-20)
20
at the previous standard inspection (2022-12-21)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

54 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2026-04-23 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to initiate Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) or call emergency medical services (EMS) for a resident with advance directives for a Full Code (indication for healthcare providers to perform all possible life-saving measures in the event of a cardiac or respiratory arrest). This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and Actual Harm/Subsequent Death on [DATE] at 5:30 A.M. when Resident #50 was found unresponsive without vital signs and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #79 and Registered Nurse (RN) #75 failed to initiate CPR or contact EMS. LPN #79 and RN #75 did not review Resident #50's code status and determined Resident #50 was deceased at 5:30 A.M. On [DATE] at 10:11 A.M., the Administrator and Registered Nurse (RN) #162 were notified Immediate Jeopardy began on [DATE] at 5:30 A.M. when Resident #50 was found unresponsive and without vital signs, and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #79 and Registered Nurse (RN) #75 failed to initiate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, facility investigation review, Emergency Medical Services report review, hospital record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to provide Resident #50, who was identified to have intermittent confusion, adequate supervision, and assistance to prevent a fall with injury. Immediate Jeopardy and serious harm and injury occurred on 11/07/23 when staff assisted Resident #50 to the facility front porch to be transported to an outside appointment. The resident was left unattended in a wheelchair thought to not have properly functioning brakes. After being left unattended, the resident moved her wheelchair from the facility porch/portico and began to roll approximately 50 feet across the parking lot toward six concrete steps. Once the wheelchair reached the first concrete step, the resident was ejected from the wheelchair and fell to a concrete pad, located at the bottom of the six steps, landing on her abdomen. The resident was assessed to have a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review and interview the facility failed to adequately monitor Resident #50 related to non-pressure skin ulcers and failed to ensure wound care was completed as ordered. Actual harm occurred on 07/04/23 when staff identified a decline in the resident's non-pressure skin ulcer to the left foot with an increase in drainage, necrosis (dead tissue) and slough (dead tissue, usually cream or yellow in color that impeded healing and increases the potential for infection) to the wound without evidence the physician or wound clinic were notified of the decline. The facility also had no evidence of wound monitoring, especially after the identified decline in the status of the wound. The resident was subsequently admitted to the hospital in serious condition on 07/16/23 with cellulitis to the left lower extremity and possible sepsis. This affected one resident (Resident #50) of four sampled residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #50's closed medical record revealed the resident was admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-27 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews with staff, the facility failed to ensure the washcloths used for resident care were not stained or discolored. This had the potential to affect all 48 residents in the facility.Findings Include: Observations conducted during the initial tour on 05/26/26 from 9:05 A.M. through 9:11 A.M. revealed all of the washcloths, 70 in total, in three of the linen closets were completely discolored/stained gray to dark brown.On 05/26/26 at 9:20 A.M. an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #106 revealed she did not know why all the washcloths in the linen closets were discolored and stained.Interview and observation of the laundry room on 05/26/26 at 9:35 A.M. with Laundry Staff #111 revealed a pile of unfolded stained/discolored washcloths on the top of the table and about a dozen white washcloths folded in the laundry cart to go out on the units. She stated the stained washcloths on the table in the pile were to be used for cleaning however the nursing staff would take the cleaning cloths and use them on the residents when they were not supposed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-23 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation of facility crash cart (a mobile cart utilized in emergency situations that contains emergency medications and equipment), review of the crash cart binder, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain emergency patient care medications and equipment in safe operating condition. This had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 48.Findings Include:Observation of the facility crash cart on [DATE] at 3:47 P.M. revealed the following expired items: suction machine with a sticker indicating the next inspection was due on 02/2026, five packets of iodine with an expiration date of 02/2025, one bottle of aspirin with an expiration date of 08/2025, one biohazard spill kit with an expiration date [DATE], 11 airway tubes with expiration dates of [DATE], one suction tip with a use by year of 2024, suction tubing with use by year of 2024, small bore extension kits with expiration years of 2025, one central line dressing kit with an expiration year of 2023, and a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, review of self reported incidents (SRI), staff interview, and policy review, facility failed to ensure a concern of resident neglect was reported to the State agency. This affected one resident (#50) of three reviewed for resident death. The facility census was 48. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), diabetes, ascites, and obesity. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 indicating intact cognition.Review of the plan of care dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 had a full code advanced directive with interventions to call nine-one-one (911) in the event the resident's heart stopped and start Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) if the resident was not breathing or had no pulse, and to start oxygen and or life-saving breaths via an artificial manual breathing unit (ambu)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, review of facility self reported incidents (SRI), staff interview, and policy review, facility failed to ensure a concern of resident neglect was thoroughly investigated. This affected one resident (#50) of three reviewed for resident death. The facility census was 48. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), diabetes, ascites, and obesity. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 indicating intact cognition.Review of the plan of care dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 had a full code advanced directive with interventions to call nine-one-one (911) in the event the resident's heart stopped and start Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) if the resident was not breathing or had no pulse, and to start oxygen and or life-saving breaths via an artificial manual breathing unit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to report an allegation of an injury of unknown origin to the State Survey Agency as required. This affected one (Resident #49) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 48.|Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #49 revealed an admission date of 02/03/17 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease with late onset, protein calorie malnutrition, major depressive disorder and chronic kidney disease.Review of Resident #49's care plan last revised on 07/15/24 revealed the resident had difficulty integrating information during conversation due to cognitive problems and she was extensive/dependent for all care. Interventions included monitor for skin concerns during care. Report all found.Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 00, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, facility policy review, and interview, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation following an allegation of an injury of unknown origin. This affected one (#49) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 48.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #49 revealed an admission date of 02/03/17 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease with late onset, protein calorie malnutrition, major depressive disorder and chronic kidney disease.Review of Resident #49's care plan last revised on 07/15/24 revealed the resident had difficulty integrating information during conversation due to cognitive problems and she was extensive/dependent for all care. Interventions included monitor for skin concerns during care. Report all found.Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 00, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to ensure showers were provided to dependent residents as scheduled and/or per plan of care. This affected two residents (Resident #38 and #49) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The census was 48.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 01/06/26 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, tremors, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder.Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13. The resident was assessed to require assistance with all activities of daily living (ADL's).Review of Resident #38's care plan last revised on 02/11/26 revealed resident required assistance with bathing, hygiene and dressing. Interventions included shower days were Mondays and Fridays.Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure meal intakes were documented to ensure residents maintained appropriate nutritional parameters to prevent potential weight loss and meet nutritional needs. This affected three residents (Resident #44, #49 and #53) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 48.|Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #44, revealed an initial admission date of 11/22/23 and a readmission date of 10/31/25 with diagnoses including Huntington's disease, dysphagia, abnormal weight loss, bipolar disorder and adult failure to thrive.Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15. The resident was assessed to require dependent on staff for eating, toileting hygiene, shower/bathing, all ADLs, bed mobility, and transfers.Review of Resident #44's care plan last revised on 03/05/26 revealed resident is at nutrition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The census was 53. Finds Included: Observation on 02/18/25 at 8:37 A.M. of the kitchen with the Dietary Manager #300 revealed serving pans of various sizes were being stored wet. There were six serving pans stacked on the shelf that were still wet. Interview on 02/18/25 at 8:40 A.M. with the Dietary Manager #300 verified after serving dishes are washed they have to be air dried completely before being stacked and put away. Review of the facility policy Cleaning Dishes/Dish Machine, dated 2023 revealed dishes should be air dried on the dish racks, not dried with towels. Dishes are to be inspected for cleanliness and dryness and put dishes away. Dishes should not be nested unless they are completely dry.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, water management plan review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a comprehensive water management plan and utilize appropriate disinfectants to prevent the spread of communicable disease. This had the potential to affect all residents who reside in the facility. The facility census was 53. Findings include: 1. Review of the undated Water Management Plan revealed it was not descriptive of the facility. The plan did not detail limits or control measures. The Water Management Plan excluded the basement and fixtures such as the backflow prevention device in the Water Management Plan flow diagrams. Review of the empty room water temperature checks revealed the water temperature checks were not completed in January, March, and April of 2024. Interview on 02/20/25 at 3:15 P.M. with the Administrator revealed the Water Management Plan is a template and in development. The Administrator revealed he would have it completed in the next month. The Administrator also revealed the minimum water temperature they test for is not indicated in the Water Management…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 41 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-20 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, resident interviews and policy review the facility failed to provide showers per resident preference. This affected six of six residents (Resident #19, #21, #26, #30, #43, and #47) reviewed for showers. The census was 53. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 05/23/24. Diagnosis included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the right dominant side and diabetes. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 was cognitively intact and under the area of preferences Resident #47 indicated it is very important to choose between a tub bath, shower, bed bath or sponge bath. The resident's cognition, according to subsequent MDS Assessments, has remained intact. Review of the care plan dated 06/07/24 revealed Resident #47 required assistance for bathing related to physical limitation and weakness. Interventions included bathing (required)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure fall/safety measures were in place for a high fall risk resident. This deficient practice affected one resident (Resident #19) of four residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility census was 53. Findings Include: Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed admission date 12/28/23 with diagnoses including but not limited to Parkinson's Disease, hemiplegia on the left side, anxiety, depression and history of stroke. Review of Resident #19's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of a possible 15 dated 01/04/25. Resident #19 required assistance from staff to complete activities of daily living (ADL) tasks including transfers, bathing/showering and personal hygiene tasks related to left side weakness and hemiplegia. Review of Section J - Health Conditions revealed two or more…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to implement indwelling urinary catheter care orders. This deficient practice affected one resident (Resident #21) of two residents reviewed for urinary catheter care. The facility census was 53. Findings Include: Review of Resident #21's medical record revealed admission date 05/26/23 with diagnoses including but not limited to end stage renal disease, obstructive uropathy, and high blood pressure. Review of Resident #21's urinary catheter care plan dated 06/02/23 revealed Resident #21 had a suprapubic indwelling urinary catheter with interventions including catheter care every shift. Review of Resident #21's signed physician orders revealed an order dated 01/01/25 to change #20 french/10 milliliter (ML) Supraprubic catheter with plug every day shift every 29 days for maintenance, last changed on 12/01/24 and an order dated 02/14/25 to flush the catheter every day shift until clear discharge for sediment. There were no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, interview and facility policy review the facility failed to obtain urinary testing prior to administration of an antibiotic medication for a possible urinary tract infection and failed to complete criteria for the use of an antibiotic medication. This deficient practice affected one resident (Resident #21) of two residents reviewed for antibiotic medication use. The census was 53. Findings Include: Review of Resident #21's medical record revealed admission date 05/26/23 with diagnoses including but not limited to end stage renal disease, obstructive uropathy, and high blood pressure. Resident #19 had moderately impaired cognition with a BIMS score of 10 out of possible 15 dated 01/20/25. Resident #21 required assistance with completion of ADL tasks including transfers, bathing/showering, personal hygiene, and had an indwelling urinary catheter. Review of Resident #21's signed physician orders dated 02/01/25 to 02/19/25 revealed an order dated 02/13/25 for antibiotic medication Amoxicillin oral tablet 500 milligram (MG) give one tablet by mouth three…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #9 and Resident #17, received education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the the influenza vaccination. This affected two residents (Resident #9 and #17) of five residents reviewed for vaccinations. The facility census was 52. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 02/02/23. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia, schizophrenia, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of Resident #9's Immunization Audit Report revealed the resident refused the influenza vaccine on 02/17/23 and education was not provided. The report did not show evidence the resident was offered the vaccine in 2024 or 2025. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 12/01/24. Diagnoses included peripheral vascular disease, diabetes mellitus, and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #17's Immunization Audit Report revealed the resident was never offered the influenza vaccine in 2024 or 2025. Interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure pressure relieving interventions, including a low air loss mattress was in place for Resident #3 as ordered to promote healing the resident's pressure ulcer. This affected one resident (#3) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, delusional disorders, type 2 diabetes, anxiety disorder, malignant neoplasm of left breast, and protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of a wound consult note dated 06/12/23 revealed Resident #3 had an in-house acquired Stage III (full-thickness loss of skin, in which adipose (fat) is visible in the ulcer. Slough and/or eschar may be visible) pressure wound to coccyx that measured 3.4 centimeters (cm) long by 0.8 cm wide with 0.6 cm depth. Review of a nurse's note dated 07/28/23 at 5:05 P.M. revealed Resident #3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #50's medical record was maintained in a complete and accurate manner related to wounds and wound care. This affected one resident (#50) of four sampled residents. The census was 49. Findings include: Review of Resident #50's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included diabetes, atrial fibrillation, high blood pressure, peripheral vascular disease, end stage renal disease with hemodialysis and lower extremity wounds. The resident was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and did not return to the facility. Resident #50 had vascular/diabetic wounds, identified on admission to multiple areas of his lower extremities/feet. The resident was noted to receive wound services from an outside provider (wound clinic). Further review revealed the facility had no comprehensive documentation from the wound clinic maintained as part of the resident's medical record to ensure a continuity of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly date opened food items in the refrigerator, freezer, and dry storage areas. The facility also failed to use proper hand hygiene during lunch meal service. The deficient practices had the potential to affect all 51 residents who resided in the facility as there were not any residents who were on a nothing by mouth (NPO) diet. Findings Include: 1. During the initial tour on 12/12/22 from 10:30 A.M. to 10:39 A.M. with Dietary Manager #134, the following items were observed not properly dated: In the refrigerator: A bag of garnish lettuce, opened and not dated A bag of leaf lettuce, opened and not dated A bag of green peppers, not dated A bag of red peppers, not dated A large plastic uncovered bin of onions, not dated Interview on 12/12/22 at 10:34 A.M. with Dietary Manager #134 confirmed the above findings. In the freezer: A bag of Key [NAME] Blend frozen vegetables, opened with a tie twisted around the bag, not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to maintain a safe and comfortable environment. This affected all the residents in the facility. The facility census was 51. Findings included: 1. Observations during the initial tour on 12/12/22 from 9:00 A.M. to 9:25 A.M. revealed; a. The carpet was torn by the 100 hall nurses station. b. The wallpaper was torn above the head of the bed in room [ROOM NUMBER]. c. A large area of the wallpaper was torn off the wall under the window. d. The paint was peeling in the corner of the ceiling and was hanging down. e. the wallpaper was torn in hallway by room [ROOM NUMBER]. f. The carpet had numerous large stains in the hallway between the Director of Nursing and Social Service offices, stains in the carpet by room [ROOM NUMBER], stains in the carpet by rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], between rooms 121 and 123, between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], at double doors outside of room [ROOM NUMBER], outside room [ROOM NUMBER], outside room [ROOM NUMBER], between rooms [ROOM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Review of Resident #31's record revealed an admission date of 03/15/22. Diagnoses included heart failure, congestive heart failure, and hypertension. Review of Resident #31's December 2022 physician orders, revealed an order, dated 03/16/22, for Digoxin 125 micrograms daily for hypertension. Review of Resident #31's pharmacy recommendation, dated 06/09/22, revealed a recommendation for a Digoxin level to be done. Continued reviewed revealed that the physician accepted and agreed to obtaining the level. Review of Resident #31's lab work revealed she had no evidence of a Digoxin level ever being obtained. Interview on 12/15/22 at 1:12 P.M. the Director of Nursing revealed Resident #31's Digoxin level was never obtained. She confirmed the order was missed. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date on 03/05/2004. Medical diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder-Bipolar type, major depressive disorder, catatonic schizophrenia, drug induced movement disorder, and Chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-21 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interview, review of resident diets, review of the menu and dietary spreadsheet, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow the pre-planned menu and provide pureed bread to five residents (Residents #1, #16, #28, #33, and #154) who received a pureed diet. The deficient practice affected all five residents (Residents #1, #16, #28, #33, and #154) who received a pureed diet. The facility census was 51. Findings Include: Review of the list of resident diets provided by the facility revealed there were five residents who received a pureed diet, Residents #1, #16, #28, #33, and #154. Review of the pre-planned lunch menu dated 12/14/22 revealed country fried steak, garlic mashed potatoes, sunshine carrots, choice of roll, cinnamon maple apple cake, country gravy, margarine, and coffee or tea was to be served to residents. Review of the dietary spreadsheet dated 12/14/22 revealed for a pureed diet the following should be served: #8 scoop of pureed country fried steak, #8 scoop of garlic mashed potatoes, #10 scoop of pureed sunshine carrots, 2/3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-21 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were in working order. This affected one Resident (#103) out of four residents reviewed for accidents, and had the potential to affect 27 residents (#1, #3, #4, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #14, #16, #18, #20, #21, #28, #31, #32, #33, #35, #37, #38, #41, #45, #103, #153, #154, #204, #301) who utilized the station #3 shower room. The census was 51. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #103 revealed an admission date of 11/22/22 and a discharge date of 12/13/22 with the diagnoses of encounter for orthopedic aftercare, osteomyelitis right ankle and foot, atrial fibrillation, dementia, peripheral autonomic neuropathy, gait abnormalities, muscle weakness, need for assist with personal care, arthritis, low back pain, benign prostatic hyperplasia and cataracts. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #42 had her call light within reach. This affected one resident (Resident #42) of five reviewed for accidents. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, generalized anxiety disorder, peripheral vascular disease, congestive heart failure, obsessive compulsive disorder, hypothyroidism, major depressive disorder, and osteoarthritis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 had severely impaired cognition. Observation on 12/12/22 at 9:15 A.M. and 10:05 A.M. revealed the call light for Resident #42 was clipped to the privacy curtain in the middle of the room out of her reach. Interview on 12/12/22 at 10:06 A.M. with the Director of Nursing verified Resident #42 could not reach her call light. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-21 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to honor residents shower preferences. This affected three residents (#22, #38, and #103) of six residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 51. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #103 revealed an admission date of 11/22/22 and a discharge date of 12/13/22 with the diagnoses of encounter for orthopedic aftercare, osteomyelitis right ankle and foot, atrial fibrillation, dementia, peripheral autonomic neuropathy, gait abnormalities, muscle weakness, need for assist with personal care, arthritis, low back pain, benign prostatic hyperplasia and cataracts. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #103 required extensive two staff assistance for transfers and bed mobility and extensive one staff assistance for toileting, personal hygiene, dressing, and bathing. Review of the care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-21 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of the Self-Reported Incident (SRI), resident interview and staff interview the facility failed to ensure misappropriation of funds did not occur for Resident #13. This affected one resident (Resident #13) of two reviewed for misappropriation of property. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included osteomyelitis, diabetes, diabetic foot ulcer to the left foot, chronic kidney disease, atherosclerotic heart disease, gout, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism, obstructive sleep apnea, and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Review of the SRI report dated 08/31/22 revealed Resident #13 reported to a staff member he had money missing from his room. The staff member informed the Administrator who began an investigation. The Administrator spoke with Resident #13 who stated it was $200.00 in a bank envelope and it was last seen the week prior. Resident #13 indicated his wallet had went through the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the facility's investigation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of verbal abuse for one resident (Resident #102). This affected one (Resident #102) of two residents reviewed for abuse/misappropriation. The facility census was 51. Findings Include: Review of the closed medical record for former Resident #102 revealed an admission date on 04/05/22 and a discharge date on 04/08/22. Medical diagnoses included paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, type II diabetes mellitus, and weakness. Review of the admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #102 was alert to person, place, and time and was verbally appropriate. Review of the Five-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #102 required limited assistance from one staff to complete Activities of Daily Living. The resident's cognition was not assessed at the time of the MDS assessment. Review of progress notes dated from 04/01/22 to date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI), policy review, resident interview and staff interviews the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegation of misappropriation for Resident #13 and verbal abuse for Resident #102. This affected two residents (Resident #13 and #102) of 17 reviewed for abuse. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included osteomyelitis, diabetes, diabetic foot ulcer to the left foot, chronic kidney disease, atherosclerotic heart disease, gout, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism, obstructive sleep apnea, and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Review of the SRI report dated 08/31/22 revealed Resident #13 reported to a staff member he had money missing from his room. The staff member informed the Administrator who began an investigation. The Administrator spoke with Resident #13 who stated it was $200.00 in a bank envelope and it was last seen the week prior. Resident #13…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-21 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of Pre-admission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASARRs), and facility policy review, the facility failed to update PASARR screenings when two residents (Resident #31 and #34) had additional mental health diagnoses added. This affected two (Residents #31 and #34) of two residents reviewed for PASARR screenings. The facility census was 51. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date on 02/25/19. Medical diagnoses included unspecified dementia with agitation (10/01/22), Major Depressive Disorder-recurrent (02/25/19), delusional disorders (08/21/19), anxiety disorder (03/29/20), hallucinations (08/21/19), and cognitive communication deficit (02/25/19). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #34 had impaired cognition and scored ten out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. The resident scored two out of 27 on the PHQ-9 assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide quarterly care conferences for Resident#17 and failed to invite Resident #5 to her care conference. This affected two (#5 and #17) of two residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 51. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed an admission date 03/25/20. Diagnoses included paraplegia, multiple sclerosis, and trigeminal neuralgia. Review of Resident #17's Minimum Data Set 3.0, dated 10/14/22, revealed the resident had intact cogitation. Interview on 12/12/22 at 10:02 A.M. Resident #17 revealed he did not recall ever being invited to a care conference meeting. Review of a yearly look back of care conferences from 12/2021 through 12/2022 revealed the resident had only had one care conference on 08/30/22. Interview on 12/14/22 at 12:54 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #105 who is in charge of setting up care conferences revealed the resident has only had one care conference this year which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assist Resident #38 and Resident #154 with nail care. This affected two (#38, #154) of two residents reviewed for nail care. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/29/20. Diagnoses included seizure disorder, COPD, asthma, obesity, and difficulty in walking. Review of Resident #38's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0, dated 9/16/22, revealed the resident was cognitively intact, and required one person physical assistance for bathing and set up help for personal hygiene. Observation on 12/12/22 at 12:26 P.M. revealed Resident #38 was noted to have long, dirty, jagged finger nails. Interview at this time with Resident #38 revealed no one has cut them (finger nails) in awhile, but he would like them cut. Interview on 12/13/22 at 9:57 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified the resident had long, dirty, jagged nails that needed cut. 2. Review of Resident #154's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/06/22. Diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer interventions were in place. This affected one resident (#37) out of one resident reviewed for pressure. The facility identified one resident (#37) with pressure ulcers. The census was 51. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 04/10/19 and the diagnoses of paraplegia, colostomy, protein calorie malnutrition, diabetes type two, spinal stenosis, and reflex neuropathic bladder. Review of the Braden pressure ulcer risk assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #37 was at low risk for developing a pressure ulcer. Review of the care plan dated 04/22/19 and updated 11/23/22 revealed Resident #37 had a history of wounds with multiple dates and stages of differing wounds. Interventions included encourage 80 to 100% of diet, float heels off bed, low air loss mattress to bed, encourage turning and repositioning at two hour…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #35's splinting program was initiated per therapy recommendations. This affected one (#35) of two residents reviewed for therapy recommendations. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/24/19. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, chronic pain syndrome, and osteoarthritis. Various observations from 12/12/22 through 12/14/22 revealed Resident #35 had a paper indicating a splinting program protocol sheet on her wall but the resident was not wearing any splints during this time. Her bilateral hands were noted to be contracted during the observations. Review of Resident #35's quarterly Mimium Data Set 3.0, dated 09/07/22, revealed she had impaired cognition and needed total dependence of one person with physical assist for personal hygiene. Review of Resident #35's Occupational Therapy Discharge Summery, dated 05/20/22, revealed the resident and staff will demonstrate 100 percent carry over of contracture management…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, family interview, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure residents were not left unattended while unresponsive, resulting in a fall for Resident #103, and failed to thoroughly investigate a fall for Resident #38. This affected two residents (#38 and #103) out of four Residents reviewed for accidents. The census was 51. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #103 revealed an admission date of 11/22/22 and a discharge date of 12/13/22 with the diagnoses of encounter for orthopedic aftercare, osteomyelitis right ankle and foot, atrial fibrillation, dementia, peripheral autonomic neuropathy, gait abnormalities, muscle weakness, need for assist with personal care, arthritis, low back pain, benign prostatic hyperplasia and cataracts. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #103 required extensive two staff assistance for transfers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #42 received her nutritional supplements as ordered. This affected one resident (Resident #42) of four revealed for nutrition. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, generalized anxiety disorder, peripheral vascular disease, congestive heart failure, obsessive compulsive disorder, hypothyroidism, major depressive disorder, and osteoarthritis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 had severely impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of one staff member for eating. She did not have a weight loss. Review of the December 2022 physician orders revealed Resident #42 had an order for a magic cup twice daily with lunch and dinner dated 11/10/22. Observation on 12/13/22 at 5:05 P.M. revealed Personal Care Attendant (PCA)#135 gave Resident #42 her meal in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to put in place an end date for Resident #31's as needed anxiety medication, and failed to implement a recommendation to reduce an antidepressant for Residents #4 and #34. This affected three out of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #4, #31, and #34). The facility census was 51. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #31's record revealed an admission date of 03/15/22. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Additionally a new diagnosis of hallucinations was added on 03/20/22. Review of Resident #31's December 2022 physician orders revealed an order dated 03/16/22 for Hydroxyzine 25 milligrams (mg) by mouth as needed for anxiety four times daily. The order did not identify a duration for the medication. Review of Resident #31's pharmacy recommendation, dated 04/15/22, revealed a recommendation to add a stop date to the resident's Hydroxyzine 25 mg four times a day. The Physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-21 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #5 was offered a pneumonia vaccine. This affected one resident (Resident #5) out of five reviewed for immunizations. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, major depressive disorder, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, obstructive sleep apnea, anxiety disorder, anemia, asthma, cramps and spasms. Further review of the medical record revealed no evidence the resident was offered or received the pneumonia vaccine. Review of the history and physical dated 04/03/15 revealed Resident #5 was not up to date on her immunization and did not want any vaccines. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 had intact cognition and was offered the pneumonia vaccine and refused. On 12/14/22 at 2:41 P.M. interview with Director of Nursing verified she could not find any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-21 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, resident interviews and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure Resident #153, Resident #201, and Resident #204 received COVID-19 vaccine education. This affected three residents (Resident #153, #201 and #204) of five reviewed for COVID-19 vaccinations. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #201 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cellulitis, acute metabolic acidosis, heart failure, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, thyrotoxicois, glaucoma, osteoarthritis, and hypertension. There was no Minimum Data Set (MDS) information available, she had refused the COVID-19 vaccination and there was no documentation COVID-19 vaccination education was given. On 12/14/22 at 10:03 A.M. interview with Resident #201 revealed she had not been given education on the COVID-19 vaccine from the facility. On 12/14/22 at 9:27 A.M. interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified the facility did not have documentation they had given…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and policy and procedure review the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines in regards to cleaning a glucometer. This had the potential to affect four residents (Residents #21, #42, #67 and #273) who were ordered to have blood sugar checks by fingerstick on Station II. The facility census was 68. Findings include: On 12/18/19 at 3:57 P.M. observation of a finger stick blood sugar (FSBS) for Resident #273 revealed Licensed Practical nurse (LPN) #245 obtained the FSBS using a glucometer. She then went to the medicine cart, placed a barrier on top of the cart and placed the glucometer on it. Using a sani cloth germicidal wipe, she wiped the glucometer for four seconds and left it on the barrier to dry, reporting it had to dry for five minutes. Review of the manufacturers guidelines on the container revealed it was to remain visibly wet for four minutes. On 12/19/19 at 8:53 A.M. LPN #245 verified she did not follow the facility policy or the manufacturer guidelines of cleaning the glucometer. Four residents (Residents #21, #42, #67…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders in regards to notification of weight gain. This affected one (Resident #67) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. The census was 68. Findings include: Resident #67 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, diabetes and stage IV kidney disease. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed her cognition was intact, and she required extensive assistance of two or more staff members for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. Review of the plan of care revised 08/23/19 revealed Resident #67 was to be weighed daily and to notify the physician if three pounds were gained in one day or five ponds gained in one week. Review of the resident's recorded weights revealed on 08/20/19 she weighed 176.2 pounds and on 08/21/19 she weighed 179.4 pounds a gain of 3.2 pounds. On 09/26/19 she weighed 177 pounds and on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-19 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide an estimated cost for services for one (Resident #56) who was discharged from Medicare part A services and remained in the facility. The deficient practice affected one (Resident #56) of three residents reviewed for Beneficiary Notices. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of the Beneficiary Notices for Resident #56 revealed the resident was discharged from Medicare part A services on 09/20/19 and remained in the facility. Review of the Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (ABN) for Resident #56 showed the notice did not include an estimated cost of services following discharge from Medicare part A services. Interview with the Office Manager on 12/17/19 at 4:34 P.M. confirmed the ABN did not include any estimated costs for continued services. The Office Manager stated the training she received did not accurately inform her of how to complete the form. The Office Manager stated she thought only the estimated cost of the resident's room and board needed to be included on the notice.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-19 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to provide an accurate smoking assessment with smoking materials secured safely for one (Resident #25) of one resident reviewed for safe smoking. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Resident #25 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, major depression, anxiety and heart disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident scored a four out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment which was considered severely impaired cognition. Review of the smoking assessment dated [DATE] completed by Registered Nurse (RN) #127 revealed Resident #25 had cognitive loss, could light his own cigarettes, smoked two to five cigarettes daily, and the staff did not store his lighter and cigarettes. He was safe to smoke unsupervised outside in the enclosed shelter. Interview on 12/17/19 at 5:30 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #204…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans included all components of care in regards to respiratory care and urinary tract infections. This affected two (Residents #15 and #16) of 19 residents whose care plans were reviewed. The facility census was 68. Findings include: 1. Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's dementia, depression and anxiety. Review of a five day minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was severely impaired, he required extensive assistance of one staff member for bed mobility, toileting and personal hygiene and total assistance of two or more staff members for transferring. Review of the physicians orders revealed an order dated 09/24/19 for BiPap (a device that assists with breathing) at home setting at bedtime. Review of the care plan revealed it failed to include information related to use of BiPap at bedtime. This was verified during interview on 12/18/19…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate care plans related to alarms and the use of pain medications. This affected two (Resident #15 and Resident #1) of 19 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 68. Findings include: 1. Resident #15's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's dementia, depression and anxiety. Review of a five day minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was severely impaired, he required extensive assistance of one staff member for bed mobility, toileting and personal hygiene and total assistance of two or more staff members for transferring. Review of the plan of care dated 11/19/19 revealed the resident was to have a mobility monitor on when in bed. Observations of Resident #15 from 12/16/19 to 12/18/19 revealed he had no mobility monitor in place while he was in bed. On 12/18/19 at 10:55 A.M. interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents received necessary assistance with activities of daily living. This affected two (Resident #9 and #15) of two residents review for activities of daily living. The facility census was 68. Findings include: 1. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, respiratory failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the annual minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was intact and he required extensive assistance of one person with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene. Observation on 12/16/19 at 12:18 P.M. revealed his clothes were soiled with a brown substance and a dried white substance and he had unkempt facial hair. On 12/17/19 at 7:55 A.M. Resident #9 was wearing the same soiled clothing and was still unshaven. At 1:15 P.M. observation revealed the same stained clothes and he remained…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to follow physician orders in regards to obtaining daily weights. This affected one (Resident #67) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Resident #67 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, diabetes and stage IV kidney disease. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed her cognition was intact. Review of physicians orders revealed an order dated 07/30/19 to obtain weights daily and to notify the physician if three pounds were gained in one day or five pounds gained in one week. Review of Resident #67's recorded weights revealed no evidence weights were obtained on 07/31/19, 08/01/19, 08/04/19, 08/07/19, 08/14/19, 8/16/19, 08/17/19, 08/18/19, 08/23/19, 08/30/19, 09/01/19, 09/05/19, 09/14/19, 09/15/19, 09/18/19, 09/19/19, 09/20/19, 09/28/19, 10/01/19, 10/04/19, 10/05/19, 10/09/19, 10/11/19, 10/12/19, 10/17/19, 10/19/19,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview and policy review the facility failed ensure smoking materials were safely secured for one (Resident #25) of one resident reviewed for safe smoking. The affected one (Resident #25) and had the potential to affect two additional residents (#36 and #7). The facility census was 68. Findings include: 1. Clinical record review revealed Resident #25 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, major depression, anxiety and heart disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident scored a four out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment which was considered severely impaired impaired cognition. Review of the smoking assessment dated [DATE] completed by Registered Nurse (RN) #127 revealed Resident #25 had cognitive loss, could light his own cigarettes, smoked two to five cigarettes daily, and the staff did not store his lighter and cigarettes. He was safe to smoke unsupervised, outside in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to provide physician ordered respiratory care for Resident #7. This affected one of two residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, anxiety and heart disease. Review of a physician's order dated 04/01/18 revealed the resident was to use oxygen (O2) at three liters per minute (LPM) as needed to keep her O2 saturation at 90 percent per checks by pulse oximeter (a device when attached to the finger determines O2 saturation). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) from 10/01/19 to present revealed no evidence the resident's O2 saturation levels were monitored. Review of documentation under the vitals tab revealed the resident's oxygen level was 90 percent on 10/07/19 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to stop administering blood pressure medication prior to dialysis at the dialysis center's request. This affected one (Resident #49) of one resident reviewed for dialysis treatment. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of Resident #49's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/18/19 with the following medical diagnoses: aneurysm of artery of upper extremity, other complication of vascular dialysis catheter, aneurysm of artery of lower extremity, diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, end stage renal disease, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery with unspecified angina pectoris, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), muscle weakness, essential primary hypertension (high blood pressure), dependency on renal dialysis (a process for purification of the blood) major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of Resident #49's physician orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the pharmacy identified perimeters for opioid medications. This affected one (Resident #15) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 68. Findings include: Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's dementia, depression and anxiety. Further review revealed a five day Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was severely impaired, he required extensive assistance of one staff members for bed mobility, toileting and personal hygiene and total assistance of two or more staff members for transferring. Review of the physicians orders revealed orders on 09/24/19 for Tramadol HCL (opioid pain medication) 50 milligrams (mg) every six hours as needed for pain and Tramadol HCL 50 mg two tabs as needed every six hours for pain and on 11/15/19 Oxycodone Immediate (opioid pain medication) 5 mg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions were attempted and blood pressures monitored prior to administration of medications. This affected one (Resident #15) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 68. Findings include: Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's dementia, depression and anxiety. Further review revealed a five day Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was severely impaired, he required extensive assistance of one staff members for bed mobility, toileting and personal hygiene and total assistance of two or more staff members for transferring. Review of the physicians orders revealed orders on 09/24/19 Tramadol HCL 50 milligrams (mg) every six hours as needed for pain and Tramadol HCL 50 mg two tablets as needed every six hours for pain and on 11/15/19 Oxycodone Immediate 5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to support the use of psychoactive medications for two (Residents #41 and #45) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 68. Findings include: 1. Clinical record review revealed Resident # 41 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including bipolar disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition. The resident had a physician's order dated 05/01/19 for a psychoactive medication (Risperidone), antipsychotic, at 1.0 milligram (mg) daily which was decreased to 0.5 mg on 12/17/19. Review of the resident's behavior intervention documentation in the Medication Administration Record (MAR) since 11/01/19 revealed there was nothing specific about what behaviors were monitored or evidence the resident was having any behaviors to support the use of the psychoactive medication. Review of the resident's progress notes since…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$15,593 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $15,593 — penalty dated 2023-12-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LEVERING MANAGEMENT, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 08/17/1971
LEVERING, CYNTHIAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF11%since 12/30/2020
LEVERING, KENNETHIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF11%since 01/01/2004
LEVERING, THOMASIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF11%since 12/30/2020
LEVERING, W. JOANIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF46%since 08/17/1971
LEVERING, WILLIAMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF14%since 01/10/2023
GUPTA, RAJNISHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/27/2017

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-18.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$342K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 61%Medicare 9%Other / private 30%

This home reported $342K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$312per resident / day
operating cost
$9,489per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$264per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365269. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next